Structural Break Tests Robust to Regression Misspecification
AbstractStructural break tests for regression models are sensitive to model misspecification. We show—analytically and through simulations—that the sup Wald test for breaks in the conditional mean and variance of a time series process exhibits severe size distortions when the conditional mean dynamics are misspecified. We also show that the sup Wald test for breaks in the unconditional mean and variance does not have the same size distortions, yet benefits from similar power to its conditional counterpart in correctly specified models. Hence, we propose using it as an alternative and complementary test for breaks. We apply the unconditional and conditional mean and variance tests to three US series: unemployment, industrial production growth and interest rates. Both the unconditional and the conditional mean tests detect a break in the mean of interest rates. However, for the other two series, the unconditional mean test does not detect a break, while the conditional mean tests based on dynamic regression models occasionally detect a break, with the implied break-point estimator varying across different dynamic specifications. For all series, the unconditional variance does not detect a break while most tests for the conditional variance do detect a break which also varies across specifications. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Abi Morshed, A.; Andreou, E.; Boldea, O. Structural Break Tests Robust to Regression Misspecification. Econometrics 2018, 6, 27.
Abi Morshed A, Andreou E, Boldea O. Structural Break Tests Robust to Regression Misspecification. Econometrics. 2018; 6(2):27.Chicago/Turabian Style
Abi Morshed, Alaa; Andreou, Elena; Boldea, Otilia. 2018. "Structural Break Tests Robust to Regression Misspecification." Econometrics 6, no. 2: 27.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.