Volatility Forecasting: Downside Risk, Jumps and Leverage Effect
AbstractWe provide empirical evidence of volatility forecasting in relation to asymmetries present in the dynamics of both return and volatility processes. Using recently-developed methodologies to detect jumps from high frequency price data, we estimate the size of positive and negative jumps and propose a methodology to estimate the size of jumps in the quadratic variation. The leverage effect is separated into continuous and discontinuous effects, and past volatility is separated into “good” and “bad”, as well as into continuous and discontinuous risks. Using a long history of the S & P500 price index, we find that the continuous leverage effect lasts about one week, while the discontinuous leverage effect disappears after one day. “Good” and “bad” continuous risks both characterize the volatility persistence, while “bad” jump risk is much more informative than “good” jump risk in forecasting future volatility. The volatility forecasting model proposed is able to capture many empirical stylized facts while still remaining parsimonious in terms of the number of parameters to be estimated. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Audrino, F.; Hu, Y. Volatility Forecasting: Downside Risk, Jumps and Leverage Effect. Econometrics 2016, 4, 8.
Audrino F, Hu Y. Volatility Forecasting: Downside Risk, Jumps and Leverage Effect. Econometrics. 2016; 4(1):8.Chicago/Turabian Style
Audrino, Francesco; Hu, Yujia. 2016. "Volatility Forecasting: Downside Risk, Jumps and Leverage Effect." Econometrics 4, no. 1: 8.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.