Next Article in Journal
Rapid Visual Detection of Peronophythora litchii on Lychees Using Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Combined with Lateral Flow Assay Based on the Unique Target Gene Pl_101565
Previous Article in Journal
Unlocking Nature’s Secrets: Molecular Insights into Postharvest Pathogens Impacting Moroccan Apples and Innovations in the Assessment of Storage Conditions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 13
Issue 4
10.3390/plants13040554
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Insights into the Bio-Chemical Changes in Wheat Induced by Cd and Drought: What Can We Learn on Cd Stress Using Neutron Imaging?

by
Yuzhou Lan
1,
Genoveva Burca
2,3,4,
Jean Wan Hong Yong
5,
Eva Johansson
1 and
Ramune Kuktaite
1,*
1
Department of Plant Breeding, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 190, SE-23422 Lomma, Sweden
2
Diamond Light Source Ltd., Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0DE, UK
3
ISIS Pulsed Neutron and Muon Source, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot OX11 0QX, UK
4
Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Alan Turing Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
5
Department of Biosystems and Technology, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 190, SE-23422 Lomma, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2024, 13(4), 554; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13040554
Submission received: 14 January 2024 / Revised: 8 February 2024 / Accepted: 16 February 2024 / Published: 18 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Response to Abiotic Stress and Climate Change)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cadmium (Cd) and drought stresses are becoming dominant in a changing climate. This study explored the impact of Cd and Cd + drought stress on durum wheat grown in soil and sand at two Cd levels. The physiological parameters were studied using classical methods, while the root architecture was explored using non-invasive neutron computed tomography (NCT) for the first time. Under Cd + drought, all the gas exchange parameters were significantly affected, especially at 120 mg/kg Cd + drought. Elevated Cd was found in the sand-grown roots. We innovatively show the Cd stress impact on the wheat root volume and architecture, and the water distribution in the “root-growing media” was successfully visualized using NCT. Diverse and varying root architectures were observed for soil and sand under the Cd stress compared to the non-stress conditions, as revealed using NCT. The intrinsic structure of the growing medium was responsible for a variation in the water distribution pattern. This study demonstrated a pilot approach to use NCT for quantitative and in situ mapping of Cd stress on wheat roots and visualized the water dynamics in the rhizosphere. The physiological and NCT data provide valuable information to relate further to genetic information for the identification of Cd-resilient wheat varieties in the changing climate.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Heavy metal pollution of agricultural soils is a major environmental problem threatening food security across the world. Among the heavy metals, Cadmium (Cd) is extremely harmful as it is known as a threat to living organisms due to its high toxicity and solubility in water [1]. Improper industrial and agricultural activities, e.g., emissions from incinerators, dispersal of mining wastes, the use of contaminated sewage sludges, and the abuse of fertilizers, are regarded as the main sources of Cd contamination in the soil [2]. The Swedish Cd consumption in the world during the 1980s reached 0.8% and Cd was found to originate from NiCd batteries, products with Cd alloys, and artificial fertilizers, where 75% of the average of Sweden’s Cd intake came from agricultural practices [3]. Excessive Cd in soil causes various physiological disorders leading to reduced plant growth: foliar chlorosis [4], impaired photosynthesis [5,6], decreased mineral uptake [7], and transpiration [8]. Additionally, significant negative effects have been reported on tissue phytohormones and root morphological traits due to Cd stress [9].
Being one of the major food crops, wheat is serving as a staple food for more than 50% of the world population [10]. Wheat, compared to other cereals, is known to accumulate Cd in its grains from Cd-contaminated soils through uptake and translocation from the roots [11,12,13]. Therefore, the Cd content allowed in wheat grains to be used for human consumption is regulated in many countries [14,15,16], and in the EU an acceptable limit is 0.1 mg/kg of grain, as set by the commission regulation (EU) 2021/1323. Nevertheless, traces of Cd in food are a threat towards human health and food security, especially when present in wheat-derived products due to the high level of consumption [17,18]. Soil in Skåne, the southernmost province of Sweden, is known to have higher Cd content than soils from other regions, resulting in higher grain Cd content in crops grown on those soils [19]. The intake of Cd from wheat products has been shown to account for a high proportion (~43%) of the total intake of Cd from food in Sweden [20]. Furthermore, soil contamination with Cd has also been documented in a number of countries worldwide, raising great concerns about food security [21,22]. Within the genus Triticum, Cd accumulation varies largely among wheat species. In particular, durum wheat has been reported to accumulate a higher amount of Cd than bread wheat, resulting in a higher content in the grain [12,13,23,24]. Therefore, a deeper understanding of the mechanisms behind Cd accumulation in wheat that can potentially improve the risk management of Cd in wheat production and the breeding of Cd-resilient wheat is extremely urgent.
Wheat productivity is increasingly impacted by drought stress, not least due to climate change contributing to a global increase in temperature and spells of extreme weather events [25,26,27]. Drought induces several changes in the plant, including physiological, biochemical, morphological, and molecular changes [28,29,30]. Yield losses from drought events have been reported for wheat across many regions around the world [25,26,27]. During the drought period, the roots of the plant are an organ that directly encounters drought stress in the soil, and, therefore, wide attention has been given to understanding the response of root traits to drought. In general, severe adverse effects from drought stress have been reported on root growth in wheat [31].
As global climate change will continue to contribute to an increasing amount of abiotic stress events, plants will be subjected to various combinations of abiotic stresses, e.g., drought, heat, and heavy metals, as well as soil compaction [32]. Few studies have evaluated the effects of combined stress, e.g., drought and Cd, on wheat development and production. However, drought stress has been reported to reduce the Cd uptake from soil in Ricinus and Brassica species [33]. The drought-restricted root growth and capacity to absorb nutrients and trace metals might be the causes of the reduction in Cd uptake in severe growing environments [34]. Changes in root characteristics under drought have been proven to decrease Cd accumulation in castor beans [35], while very limited information is available on drought impact and Cd accumulation in wheat.
As both Cd and drought are environmental abiotic stresses based on changes in soil properties, understanding root–soil interactions is crucial for combined studies on the effects of drought stress and long-term strategies (including breeding) to reduce Cd uptake in Swedish wheat and wheat worldwide. The conventional method of measuring root traits is based on a physical separation of the root samples from soil [36], which is disruptive to the rhizosphere and imprecise, as it leads to a loss in root volume, and this approach is also highly labor-intensive and time-consuming. Since the late 1970s, a non-invasive soil imaging methodology has arisen with the development of novel technologies, including X-ray computed tomography (XCT) [37,38], magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [39], nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (NMR) [40,41], and neutron imaging (NI) [42,43,44]. The advent of neutron computed tomography (NCT) has facilitated novel root–soil research as it provides an in situ visualization of the rhizosphere in a 3D form enabling greater biological insights than a traditional flatbed 2D observation. The water distribution and movements between the roots and soil have been successfully explored using NCT [45,46]. Furthermore, the root length of wheat quantified using NCT has been proven to be significantly correlated with root length measured using physical flatbed scanning [47]. Most previous studies focusing on Cd stress and wheat root traits have been based on either flatbed scanning or biomass weighting [48,49,50]. To our knowledge, there is no information on visualizing the wheat root morphology during Cd stress using NCT.
Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the individual Cd and combined effects of Cd and drought on the early growth of durum wheat in two different growth media, i.e., soil from a field in southern Sweden and commercial sand. We also questioned whether NCT can be useful to obtain information about the Cd stress impact on wheat development and water distribution in soil vs. sand. For the first time, this study shed light on how the physiological methods and non-invasive NCT can be combined to provide valuable information on durum wheat development under stress conditions and for the first time show root–soil/sand interactions in wheat grown under Cd stress.

2. Results

2.1. The Effects of Cd and Cd + Drought on Gas Exchange Parameters

A significant effect was found on gas exchange parameters, such as the A/Ci curves, stomatal conductance, and water use efficiency (WUE) from the control in the soil (CSoil), Cd concentration in the soil (CdSoil) and Cd concentration + drought (CdDSoil; Figure 1). A content of 60 mg/kg Cd in the soil combined with drought (CdDSoil) reduced the A/Ci curve intensity significantly as compared to CSoil conditions (Figure 1a), while an additional and significant decrease in A values was observed when the Cd concentration increased (from 60 to 120 mg/kg) in both the no drought and drought conditions (Figure 1a,b). Thus, the largest effect on the A/Ci curve was obtained for the highest Cd concentration (120 mg/kg) combined with drought (CdDSoil), clearly indicating the inhibitory cross effect of Cd and drought on photosynthesis in wheat plants (Figure 1a,b).
After a growing period of 21 days (four days in 120 mg/kg of Cd + drought conditions), the plants showed clear stress symptoms, e.g., CdDSoil plants were smaller in size than CSoil plants, while no such clear differences were observed between CdSoil and CSoil plants (Figure 1c). Cadmium in the soil (both at 60 and 120 mg/kg) had a significant effect on the stomatal conductance, while neither the difference in Cd concentration in the soil nor the addition of drought conditions to the Cd-treated plants showed a significant influence on the stomatal conductance of the plants (Figure 1d). The transpiration rate (E) and water use efficiency (WUE) showed a similar pattern, where the combination of Cd in the soil (both 60 and 120 mg/kg) and drought conditions (i.e., CdDSoil) resulted in a significant decrease in both E and WUE (Figure 1e,f). No significant effects were obtained for CdSoil-treated plants as compared to CSoil plants at the studied Cd amounts.

2.2. The Levels of Cd in Wheat Tissues under Cd and Cd + Drought Stresses

The Cd content in dried shoots and roots, as evaluated using inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), showed differences for plants grown in sand versus soil (Figure 2). Plants grown in sand accumulated significantly more Cd in both their roots and shoots than plants grown in soil, independent of whether the plants were also drought-treated. We observed Cd contents 15 and 6 times higher in CdSand roots (1140 mg/kg) and shoots (170.5 mg/kg) than in CdSoil roots and shoots (Figure 2a), while CdDSand roots (582 mg/kg) and shoots (60 mg/kg) were approximately 10 and 2 times higher than those found in CdDSoil, respectively (Figure 2a).
A significantly lower shoot dry weight was obtained for CdDSoil and CdDSand samples as compared to plants grown in CSoil and CSand (Figure 2b). No significant effect on the dry weight of roots was obtained for plants grown in soil, while the plants grown in sand showed a significantly lower root dry weight under the sole treatment of Cd (Figure 2b).

2.3. Foliar Chlorophyll Content and Fluorescence under Cd and Cd + Drought Stresses

A significant reduction in the foliar chlorophyll content (SPAD) was obtained in CdDSoil and CdDSand samples as compared to control samples (CSoil and CSand; Figure 3a). No significant difference in the SPAD value was observed in the plants grown under sole Cd stress compared to control samples (CSoil and CSand; Figure 3a). No significant difference in the fluorescence (Fv/Fm) value was found among plants from the different treatments (Figure 3b).

2.4. Effects of Growing Media on Root Volume and Architecture as Evaluated Using NCT

The NCT study clearly showed a variation in root volume for the two wheat genotypes, Tramadur and Duramonte, grown in different media (Figure 4). A higher root volume in sand (Duramonte: 57.1 mm3, Tramadur: 45.4 mm3) than in soil (Duramonte: 32.9 mm3, Tramadur: 36.5 mm3) was observed for both genotypes (Figure 4a). Duramonte exhibited a larger root volume in sand as compared to soil, different to what was observed in Tramadur. A clear difference in the 3D root architecture between the soil and sand samples was observed using NCT for both genotypes (Figure 4b,c compared to Figure 4d,e). In soil, roots were less branched and relatively straight, and were distributed along the tube from the top down to the bottom (Figure 4b,c). The roots in sand were somewhat more branchy, dense, and more concentrated around the middle of the tube with more bends and sharp turns than in soil (Figure 4d,e).

2.5. Root Volume and Architecture of Wheat under Cd Stress Evaluated Using NCT

The root volume and branching of Tramadur plants under Cd stress clearly varied among the sand and soil samples, as shown using NCT (Figure 5a). In both soil and sand, the root volume decreased due to Cd stress from 57.7 mm3 (control) to 29.2 mm3 (Cd sample) in soil and from 63.7 mm3 (control) to 58.0 mm3 (Cd sample) in sand (Figure 5a). The 3D branching of roots was somewhat different between the soil and sand samples, and smaller root branching most likely due to Cd stress was observed only in soil samples when compared to non-stress conditions (Figure 5b,c). In sand, the roots were more developed and showed a curly and more branching pattern as compared to soil, although sharp turns of roots remained unchanged between the control and the Cd stress samples (Figure 5d,e).

2.6. Water Distribution in Different Growing Media as Monitored Using NCT

It was possible to differentiate the water distribution between the growing media (soil and sand) and a varying pattern of the “roots-growing media-water” as illustrated in 3D NCT scans shown in Figure 6. In soil, water was rather evenly dispersed with discontinuous water droplets along the soil particles from the top to the bottom of the tube (Figure 6a,c,d). In sand, the water was largely localized in the lower part of the column, while in the upper part, large water regions were formed (Figure 6e,g,h; light grey continuous color). A large continuous water network was closely associated with the pores observed within the sand media (Figure 6g,h). In soil, the column displayed the small water areas that were evenly dispersed within the soil aggregates together with channels across the whole tube within a range of 1 mm up to 5 mm (Figure 6d).
As expected, the growing media porosity differed between the soil and sand, mainly in the packing of media particles, as numerous aggregated particles with pores along them were observed in soil compared to sand (Figure 6b compared to Figure 6f). The soil particle aggregates were approximately 1 mm in size after root penetration and water treatment, and formed a robust soil matrix (Figure 6a,d; dark grey and black areas, respectively). The sand media consisted of a rather compact media system in which the particles with reduced aggregates, smaller pores, and greater moisture content were observed in comparison with the soil system (Figure 6e,f).

3. Discussion

The present study clearly showed that a high soil Cd concentration (e.g., 120 mg/kg) and, realistically, a combination of soil Cd with drought stress, negatively affected most of the photosynthetic parameters (e.g., stomatal conductance and relative chlorophyll content) and wheat plant development. This is in agreement with previous studies on Cd as a sole stress factor, where at high Cd concentrations decreased plant growth was found due to negative effects on photosynthesis oxidative stress in cells and the water balance [51,52,53]. Although the Cd stress effect differed in various growth media, e.g., soil-based vs. hydroponic growing systems [54], we are also aware that the chosen Cd concentrations in this study can be somewhat elevated compared to the real soil concentration expected in the field.
From the present study, drought was found to add to the effects of soil Cd as a sole factor on foliar stomatal conductance and water use efficiency (WUE), resulting in a reduction in the growth and photosynthesis of wheat. The water use efficiency (WUE) is known to be an important parameter to evaluate the plant physiological response and tolerance to drought [55,56]. The fact that the WUE was severely depressed by the combined Cd and drought stresses (with no individual effect and regardless of Cd concentration) suggests that the drought stress impacted the photosynthesis rate (A) more than the transpiration rate (E). Since biomass production in wheat is highly linked to transpiration, a focus on breeding is therefore important to identify genotypes with a high capacity to capture moisture in the soil, which is a good opportunity to improve the yield under drought stress conditions [57] in future studies. The limited transpiration rate under drought stress noted for the wheat plants in this study may be the result of hydraulic restrictions within the plant, which has in previous studies been shown to slow down the water moving from the roots to the upper leaves [58]. The foliar photosynthetic rate decrease during drought in the present study has in previous studies been found to be related to several mechanisms such as decreased turgor pressure, stomata closure, a reduction in CO2 assimilation, and the lowering of photosystem I (PSI) and II (PSII) activities [59,60], which could be part of the explanation in this study. Thus, the highly hampered photosynthetic characteristics and growth of wheat plants at early development stages from high soil Cd concentration (120 mg/kg) combined with drought in this study was the result of the root-to-shoot translocation mechanism of Cd. This translocation mechanism seems to differ and was strongly impacted by the growth media used (the roots in the sand were prone to accumulating more Cd than those in the soil).
The general Cd levels in agricultural soils range between 0.1–1.0 mg/kg [61], and in this study we used a high Cd concentration to imitate heavily contaminated site soils recorded in different regions, e.g., 32.5 mg/kg in Deyang, China [62], 0.05–176 mg/kg in Gebze, Turkey [63], and 60–100 mg/kg in Vallåkra, Trelleborg and Österlen, Sweden [64]. Based on the fact that the Cd is taken up through roots, for further translocation to other parts of a plant (e.g., shoots and grains) [7,65], the used soil Cd levels were assumed to have a severe phytotoxic effect on wheat tissues through an inhibiting effect on morphological and physiological processes, as previously described [66]. Taking this into account, no significant differences in the final biomass of the wheat plants were observed in the present study, neither for dried roots-shoots grown in soil or sand nor compared to their respective control. This was most likely the result of the short experimental growth period (21 days) in this study. It is noteworthy that the Cd accumulation in roots was more than 10 times higher in sand than in soil regardless of the applied stress treatments (e.g., individual Cd or a combination of Cd + drought stress). These observations are indicative of different root-to-shoot Cd translocation mechanisms for the growth media used, which was supported by other studies. For example, the Cd uptake by plant roots has in previous studies been shown to be greatly determined by the properties of the growing media [67]. In soil, the Cd chemical forms might be water soluble; exchangeable (bioavailable and mobile) with various linkages to carbonate, oxide, and organic compounds; or existing independently as residual compounds [68]. Furthermore, the bioavailability of Cd has been found to be more relevant to plant Cd uptake than the total soil Cd content [69]. Due to the complexity of Cd–soil interactions that are influenced by pH, redox potential (Eh), organic matter (e.g., clay minerals), and soil microorganisms [70,71,72], we assume that the Cd impacts on plants and the Cd–soil interaction might differ during various field conditions. Interestingly, the studied soil and sand media dispersions in water (results not shown) showed no significant difference in pH, suggesting factors such as Eh, organic matter, and soil microorganisms were playing a minor role in this study. Cadmium in the soil-water dispersion are known to exist in the form of free Cd2+ in high Eh conditions, while it is precipitated as CdS and CdCO3 in low Eh conditions [73,74]. In the present study, the level of Cd in the soil taken from the field was 0.33 mg kg−1 of Cd (its chemical form in the soil was unclear). As soil organic matter can function as an adsorbent to complex Cd2+ and may result in a reduction of Cd bioavailability [75,76], this might partly explain differences in the root-Cd content of wheat plants grown in sand and soil. To complicate the story about Cd availability in the soil further, the application of chelated fertilizers has the potential to result in the accumulation of both synthetic and natural organic substances such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and vegetable-extracted amino acids in the soil, and these chelates can also play a role in enhancing the bioavailability to plants by forming metal chelates [77,78,79], as was seen in ryegrass [80]. However, adding to this, in our study we can speculate about suitable soil microbes that can decrease Cd bioavailability by binding Cd with their secreted proteins and further converting it into non-available forms. Similar findings were observed in another study [81]. In our study, one explanation can be the presence of organic matter (acting as Cd2+ adsorbents), and microbes in the soil that might be responsible for lowering the Cd availability. Interestingly, higher Cd immobilization in soils was observed for wheat and rice when higher levels of organic matter (biochar) were added [78].
When comparing individual Cd and Cd + drought stresses, a significantly lower Cd accumulation was found in plants grown in sand with a combination of Cd + drought, suggesting the clear impact of a water imbalance (low availability) and potential mechanisms related to the mitigation of drought-induced damages in plants. The impact of Cd + drought has shown that drought reduced the Cd content in both shoots [82] and roots [83] in several plant species (e.g., peanuts, Ricinus communis, and Brassica juncea), and also showed weakened soil-to-root translocation of Cd under drought [33,35]. Nevertheless, for the common bread wheat grown in Cd-contaminated soils in a field, the results were contrary and indicated an increase in Cd accumulation observed under drought [52]. For durum wheat grown in the field containing elevated amounts of soil-Cd in Sweden (Österlen), drought seemed to negatively impact the production of durum wheat and increase Cd accumulation in the grains. From this and other studies, it can be assumed that the impact of drought on Cd accumulation is determined by various factors such as the plant species, growth stage and media, stress level, and duration of stress period [33,35,83].
The 3D root architecture results showed that detailed wheat root growth information can be quantified and visualized in non-transparent media using the non-invasive and promising NCT technique. This observation can justify our hypothesis that NCT can be a valuable technique to study Cd stress in wheat. The root volume, mapped using NCT, of the two wheat genotypes (Duramonte and Tramadur) suggested a similar root vigor with some differences in root volume in soil as compared to sand between the genotypes. From the 3D images of wheat plants growing in the soil, Tramadur seemed to develop more lateral roots at the bottom of the tube, which differed from Duramonte. In sand, the roots of both genotypes seemed to be clearly more contorted than in soil, with more volume accumulated in the middle of the tubes. These morphological changes (e.g., alteration in growth orientation) of root systems were influenced by the soil bulk density and soil type, and it is widely accepted that a more compacted soil texture leads to greater tortuosity in root growth [84,85,86]. However, some studies have also noted reduced root length and concomitant thickening of roots with increasing soil strength [87,88]. No studies have until now evaluated the wheat root growth paths and its differences in various growth media, such as soil and sand, which we revealed for the first time in this study using NCT. Based on our NCT-derived images, we interpreted that the twisted shape of roots observed in this study was due to the stronger resistance force that roots encountered during elongation in sand. More detailed research is needed to evidence whether wheat roots can actively alter their growing orientation while seeking more soil nutrient resources, as indicated in previous studies [89], and avoiding Cd and arid patches in the rhizosphere.
The results from NCT 3D images also clearly showed reductions in the root volume under Cd stress as compared to their respective controls in soil and sand. This is the first quantification of wheat root volume and characterization of the wheat root architecture under Cd stress using the NCT technique. Furthermore, this study indicates the unique potential of neutron imaging as a non-destructive method for quantitative mapping of Cd stress on plants’ roots that can help with Cd management in Swedish soils. A more profound study is needed for the further exploration of NCT towards critical Cd transport in different parts of wheat plants. From the 3D images, wheat roots appeared thinner and with fewer lateral roots under Cd stress in soil, which corresponded to results from previous studies showing a significant reduction in the root diameter, lateral roots, and root volume under Cd stress [90].
Neutron imaging has been used to investigate the soil water distribution previously [44,47,91] and the results from this study showed a similar water pattern in wheat roots in soil. This water pattern differed greatly compared to the water pattern in sand, which clearly indicated an impact on root growth from the growth media. Differences in soil particle sizes were recorded from the 3D images in this study. Compared to the originally sieved particle size of 1 mm, the larger aggregates of soil were formed with root and water penetration, resulting in larger air pores and an increased porosity of the soil column. The faster moisture loss observed in soil might potentially be explained by this aerated soil structure, as well as a different soil vs. sand architecture. In this study, both media were surface irrigated, so the different physical properties between soil and sand might account for the water distribution differences observed. Soil aggregates are known to absorb water, and the absorption capacity and water retention ability are greatly dependent on the soil aggregate sizes [47]. Unlike soil, sand particles do not absorb moisture in the same way, which resulted in the outcome observed in this study, justifying the importance of growing media in facilitating water retention.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials

Two durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) genotypes, Tramadur and Duramonte, were provided by Lilla Harrie Valskvarn AB, Kävlinge, Sweden, and (i) a greenhouse trial with Tramadur was carried out at the Department of Plant Breeding, the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Lomma, Sweden, while (ii) a neutron imaging experiment as a proof of concept with both Tramadur and Duramonte was performed at the IMAT beamline (Imaging and Materials Science & Engineering) [92] from the ISIS Pulsed Neutron and Muon Source, UK. In both cases, wheat seeds were sown 10 mm beneath the media surface in quartz tubes in order to establish the plant-growth media settlement suiting for neutron imaging experiment (e.g., the choice of tube type and size was adapted to the beamline technical requirements) to monitor Cd stress on wheat development. Three seeds of each variety were planted in individual tubes and these were used as replicates. The proof of concept experiment was performed on the highly selected plant material that was subjected only to Cd stress due to the hypothesis testing whether NCT can provide valuable information on the wheat plant development (drought stress experiment was excluded due to long data collection times and severe plant physiological changes).

4.2. Soil and Sand

Two types of cultivation media, i.e., clay loam soil from a field of Southern Sweden (55°43′3.85″ E and 13°7′51.19″ S), provided by Lilla Harrie Valskvarn AB, Kävlinge, Sweden, and commercial sand purchased from Rådasand (Lidköping, Sweden), were used to grow wheat plants in both cases. The field soil sample was HNO3-digested (120 °C, 30 min) to measure Cd concentration originally contained 0.33 mg kg−1 of Cd as analyzed using Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) [93]. The soil was passed through a 1 mm sieve before sowing the seeds, and the particle size of the sand was 0.8–1.2 mm. The soil characteristics from Österlen region were of a varying type that included to a large extent moraine and hummus of acidic nature [94].

4.3. Greenhouse Experiment for Physiological Traits

4.3.1. Growing Conditions and Treatments

The greenhouse trial was conducted in February in a greenhouse chamber (Alnarp, Sweden) at 25 °C using artificial light to achieve a consistent 12 h daylength (7:00–19:00). Plants were grown in common glass tubes (SCHOTT, Mainz, Germany) with either soil or sand filled to 80 mm height in order to mimic growing conditions and create wheat plant-growth media suiting system for neutron imaging experiment. Wheat plants were subjected to non-stress control growing conditions in soil and sand (CSoil and CSand), Cd stress (CdSoil and CdSand), and Cd + drought stress (CdDSoil and CdDSand) growing conditions; single drought conditions were not included in the study due to main focus on Cd.
The water content in CSoil, CdSoil, CSand, and CdSand was maintained using surface watering with 3 mL water every second day. The drought stress was applied by withholding the water 10 days after sowing (DAS) until the end of the experiment in CdDSoil and CdDSand. The Cd solution used contained 2.55 mg/mL of cadmium nitrate, Cd (NO3)2. In soil, the cadmium levels (60 and 120 mg/kg) were used to grow CdSoil and CdDSoil samples, and these levels were obtained with Cd(NO3)2 solution (adjusted to Cd natural level in the soil). The Cd (NO3)2 solution was applied on 14 DAS and 18 DAS, separately. In sand, the cadmium levels of 30 mg/kg and 60 mg/kg were used for sand samples CdSand and CdDSand, and Cd(NO3)2 solution was, similarly as for soil cultivation, applied on 14 DAS and 18 DAS, separately. Three biological replicates of wheat samples were used.

4.3.2. Gas Exchange Measurements

Gas exchange parameters, i.e., net photosynthesis rate (A), intercellular CO2 concentrations (Ci), transpiration rate (E), and stomatal conductance (g) of wheat plants grown in soil were measured on young and fully expanded leaves after 17 and 21 DAS in three replicates with two plants in each replicate using a portable photosynthesis system (LI-6800, Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) [95]. Due to the small leaf size, each gas exchange measurement was performed using two wheat leaves (combined leaf area measured earlier; Figure 7). To improve the precision, the gas exchange instrument was calibrated one day before each measurement against the ambient temperature and humidity, with regular chamber-matching routine every hour. The A/Ci curves were plotted based on A and Ci using the reference CO2 concentration at 400, 200, 100, 50, 0, 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, and 1400 µmol mol−1. Data of g were collected under fixed reference CO2 concentration of 400 µmol mol−1 and fixed light intensity (Q) of 1000 µmol m⁻2 s⁻1. The instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE) was calculated as the ratio of A to E, where E is the transpiration rate (molwater m−2 s−2) [96]. To ensure the validity of gas exchange experiment and data collection, all the measurements were performed from 09:30 to 16:30, when leaf stomata remained naturally open. Due to the short measuring window, wheat plants grown in sand were not subjected to gas exchange measurements.

4.3.3. Foliar Chlorophyll Content and Chlorophyll Fluorescence

The foliar chlorophyll content (MC-100 chlorophyll concentration meter, Apogee Instruments, Logan, Utah, USA) represented by soil plant analysis development (SPAD) value and chlorophyll fluorescence (Pocket PEA chlorophyll fluorimeter, Hansatech Instruments, King’s Lynn, UK) represented by ratio of variable fluorescence to maximum fluorescence (Fv/Fm) value were measured on the same young and fully expanded leaves during 09:30 to 16:30 in both soil and sand 21 DAS (three days after the second Cd treatment) in three biological replicates, similarly as reported earlier [97,98].

4.3.4. Dry Weight and Cd Content

At 22 DAS, all plant samples were collected and each seedling was sampled separately in two parts, i.e., shoots and roots. Both shoots and roots were dried in an oven (Memmert, Germany) at 70 °C for 24 h, and later three biological replicates of the dry biomass were weighed. The two biological replicates of each sample were digested with HNO3 at 120 °C for 30 min and the Cd content was measured using inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).

4.4. Root Architecture Assay Based on NCT

4.4.1. Growing Conditions and Treatments

Wheat plants were grown in bottom-capped boron (B) free quartz tubes (Donghai Baosheng Quartz Products Co. Ltd., Donghai, China) with an inside diameter of 17 mm, an outside diameter of 20 mm, and a length of 100 mm in a simplified growth chamber at consistent temperature and daylength (22 °C and 12 h, respectively; growing settings were chosen according to the technical set-up of the beamline). Selected growth medium (soil or sand) was filled in tubes and up to the 80 mm mark. Wheat plants were grown under non-stress “control” conditions in either soil or sand (CSoil and CSand), and in medium containing Cd (CdSoil and CdSand), and two replicates were used. At 15 DAS, external Cd treatment (120 mg/kg) was applied by adding Cd(NO3)2 solution to CdSoil and CdSand tubes. Selected plants from each treatment were subjected to the NCT measurement.

4.4.2. NCT for Root Analysis

The NCT measurements were carried out at the IMAT neutron imaging beamline of the ISIS neutron spallation source at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (UK) [99] using an optical system equipped with a CCD Andor camera for the standard neutron tomography based on a previously described protocol [47,99,100]. The scans were performed on 14 and 16 DAS of wheat plants. At 14 DAS, NCT was performed on two wheat plants grown in soil and sand of both Tramadur and Duramonte genotypes (before the first Cd treatment) in order to evaluate the method’s suitability and testing the hypothesis whether the method can provide suitable information on root morphology variation induced using Cd stress. For further NCT analysis, Tramadur was selected and used in Cd treatment (due to technical feasibility of the experiment). At 16 DAS, NCT was performed on the Tramadur genotype in order to investigate the effects of Cd treatments in two growing media (CSoil, CdSoil, CSand, CdSand).

4.4.3. Image Reconstruction and Root Segmentation

Raw images were reconstructed into a stack of TIFF format files using the software Octopus Reconstruction, version 8.9 [101,102]. The reconstructed images were then imported into the software 3D slicer for 3D architecture generation, segmentation, and analysis. The root segmentation was performed manually due to the low contrast in neutron attenuation values between some sections of the root system and the moisture of soil/sand. The relative volumetric moisture content of the soil/sand was then compared based on the relative neutron attenuation [46].

4.5. Data Analysis

Means from the gas exchange experiments which include chlorophyll content and chlorophyll fluorescence, as well as means of dry weight and Cd concentration were compared using Tukey’s post hoc test in the software R Studio, version 2023.06.1 [103] with the R package “agricolae”. Averaged NCT data from each scan were also used.

5. Conclusions

As a consequence of more frequent climate change-linked perturbations, occurrences of Cd and drought scenarios are challenging food supplies by lowering wheat production. The Cd + drought stress scenario used in this study is likely to prevail in the future, thereby severely impairing the net photosynthesis rate of wheat. We suggest that the higher Cd levels in sand-grown roots than in soil were due to different medium-root-to-shoot transfer mechanisms. For the first time, unique 3D information about the roots’ architecture during Cd stress was obtained, which highlighted the good potential of NCT as a non-destructive method for both the quantitative mapping of Cd’s effect on wheat roots and the water dynamics in sand and soil. The medium-related rhizospheric differences determined using NCT were related to the Cd levels, particle size variation, and porosity of the growing media, which were likely in turn to influence the wheat root architecture. In addition to root morphology, NCT images successfully visualized novel three-dimensional structural differences in the water distribution between soil roots and sand roots, which might help to better understand and model the root–substratum–water interactions. Further work is needed to identify suitable wheat genotypes that could be cultivated with selected soil microbes and organic amendments in Cd-contaminated Swedish soils, and produce wheat grains that are fit for human consumption, i.e., with an acceptable Cd content.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L. and R.K.; methodology, Y.L., G.B., J.W.H.Y. and R.K.; software, Y.L. and G.B.; validation, Y.L. and R.K.; formal analysis, Y.L.; investigation, Y.L. and G.B.; resources, Y.L., J.W.H.Y. and R.K.; data curation, Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.L., G.B., J.W.H.Y., E.J. and R.K.; visualization, Y.L.; supervision, E.J. and R.K.; project administration, R.K.; funding acquisition, R.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Vinnova project (grant number 2020-00830), Trees and Crops for the Future (TC4F), SLU Grogrund, and Partnerskap Alnarp.

Data Availability Statement

The data are openly available from the first author and can be accessed upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the scientific collaboration for the IMAT beamline (RB2190113 with DOI:10.5286/ISIS.E.RB2190113) at ISIS Neutron and Muon Source of Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC), UK.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Lockwood, A.P.M. Effects of Pollutants on Aquatic Organisms; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1976; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  2. Taylor, G.; Pahlsson, A.; Benglsson, G.; Baath, E.; Tranvik, L. Heavy metal ecology and terrestrial plant, microorganisms and invertebrates—A Review. Water Air Soil Pollut 1989, 47, 189–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Backe, C.; Björn, H.; Holmqvist, J.; Andreasson, F. Kadmiumsituationen i Skåne. Exempel på kadmiumkällor och halter i den skånska miljön. Skåne Utveckl. 2003, 2003, 46. [Google Scholar]
  4. Das, P.; Samantaray, S.; Rout, G.R. Studies on cadmium toxicity in plants: A review. Environ. Pollut. 1997, 98, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Di Toppi, L.S.; Gabbrielli, R. Response to cadmium in higher plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 1999, 41, 105–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nedjimi, B.; Daoud, Y. Cadmium accumulation in Atriplex halimus subsp. schweinfurthii and its influence on growth, proline, root hydraulic conductivity and nutrient uptake. Flora Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants 2009, 204, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Feng, R.; Wei, C.; Tu, S.; Ding, Y.; Song, Z. A dual role of se on Cd toxicity: Evidences from the uptake of Cd and some essential elements and the growth responses in paddy rice. Biol. Trace Element Res. 2013, 151, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Walley, J.W.; Huerta, A.J. Exposure to environmentally relevant levels of cadmium primarily impacts transpiration in field-grown soybean. J. Plant Nutr. 2010, 33, 1519–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Song, J.; Finnegan, P.M.; Liu, W.; Xiang, L.; Yong, J.W.H.; Xu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Wen, Y.; Qin, K.; Guo, J.; et al. Mechanisms underlying enhanced Cd translocation and tolerance in roots of Populus euramericana in response to nitrogen fertilization. Plant Sci. 2019, 287, 110206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Abbas, T.; Zia-ur-Rehman, M.; Hannan, F.; Keller, C.; Al-Wabel, M.I.; Ok, Y.S. Cadmium minimization in wheat: A critical review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 130, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Greger, M.; Löfstedt, M. Comparison of uptake and distribution of cadmium in different cultivars of bread and durum wheat. Crop. Sci. 2004, 44, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jafarnejadi, A.R.; Homaee, M.; Sayyad, G.; Bybordi, M. Large scale spatial variability of accumulated cadmium in the wheat farm grains. Soil Sediment Contam. Int. J. 2011, 20, 98–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Abedi, T.; Mojiri, A. Cadmium uptake by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): An overview. Plants 2020, 9, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hu, H.; Jin, Q.; Kavan, P. A study of heavy metal pollution in China: Current status, pollution-control policies and countermeasures. Sustainability 2014, 6, 5820–5838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, Y. General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed; Codex Stan 193–1995; FAO/WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Grant, C.A.; Bailey, L.D. Nitrogen, phosphorus and zinc management effects on grain yield and cadmium concentration in two cultivars of durum wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1998, 78, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gao, X.; Grant, C.A. Cadmium and zinc concentration in grain of durum wheat in relation to phosphorus fertilization, crop sequence and tillage management. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2012, 2012, 817107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guo, G.; Lei, M.; Wang, Y.; Song, B.; Yang, J. Accumulation of As, Cd, and Pb in sixteen wheat cultivars grown in contaminated soils and associated health risk assessment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Eriksson, J.E.; Söderström, M. Cadmium in soil and winter wheat grain in southern Sweden: I. factors influencing Cd levels in soils and grain. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 1996, 46, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hellstrand, S.; Landner, L. Cadmium in Fertilizers, Soil, Crops and Foods-the Swedish Situation; National Chemicals Inspectorate: Solna, Sweden, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  21. Khan, M.U.; Shahbaz, N.; Waheed, S.; Mahmood, A.; Shinwari, Z.K.; Malik, R.N. Comparative health risk surveillance of heavy metals via dietary foodstuff consumption in different land-use types of Pakistan. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2015, 22, 168–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Simmons, R.; Pongsakul, P.; Saiyasitpanich, D.; Klinphoklap, S. Elevated levels of cadmium and zinc in paddy soils and elevated levels of cadmium in rice grain downstream of a zinc mineralized area in Thailand: Implications for public health. Environ. Geochem. Health 2005, 27, 501–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Erdem, H.; Tosun, Y.K.; Ozturk, M. Effect of cadmium-zinc interactions on growth and Cd-Zn concentration in durum and bread wheats. Fresenius Environ. Bull 2012, 21, 1046–1051. [Google Scholar]
  24. Naeem, A.; Saifullah; Rehman, M.Z.-U.; Akhtar, T.; Ok, Y.S.; Rengel, Z. Genetic variation in cadmium accumulation and tolerance among wheat cultivars at the seedling stage. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2016, 47, 554–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fischer, R.A.; Maurer, R. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1978, 29, 897–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Giunta, F.; Motzo, R.; Deidda, M. Effect of drought on yield and yield components of durum wheat and triticale in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crop. Res. 1993, 33, 399–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Senapati, N.; Stratonovitch, P.; Paul, M.J.; Semenov, M. Drought tolerance during reproductive development is important for increasing wheat yield potential under climate change in Europe. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 2549–2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gregorová, Z.; Kováčik, J.; Klejdus, B.; Maglovski, M.; Kuna, R.; Hauptvogel, P.; Matušíková, I. Drought-induced responses of physiology, metabolites, and PR proteins in Triticum aestivum. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 8125–8133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lan, Y.; Chawade, A.; Kuktaite, R.; Johansson, E. Climate Change Impact on Wheat Performance—Effects on vigour, plant traits and yield from early and late drought stress in diverse lines. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gupta, A.; Rico-Medina, A.; Caño-Delgado, A.I. The physiology of plant responses to drought. Science 2020, 368, 266–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ehdaie, B.; Layne, A.P.; Waines, J.G. Root system plasticity to drought influences grain yield in bread wheat. Euphytica 2012, 186, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Suzuki, N.; Rivero, R.M.; Shulaev, V.; Blumwald, E.; Mittler, R. Abiotic and biotic stress combinations. New Phytol. 2014, 203, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bauddh, K.; Singh, R.P. Growth, tolerance efficiency and phytoremediation potential of Ricinus communis (L.) and Brassica juncea (L.) in salinity and drought affected cadmium contaminated soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2012, 85, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Thomas, H. Drought Resistance in Plants; Routledge: London, UK, 1997; pp. 1–42. [Google Scholar]
  35. Shi, G.; Xia, S.; Ye, J.; Huang, Y.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Z. PEG-simulated drought stress decreases cadmium accumulation in castor bean by altering root morphology. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015, 111, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pierret, A.; Moran, C.J.; Doussan, C. Conventional detection methodology is limiting our ability to understand the roles and functions of fine roots. New Phytol. 2005, 166, 967–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Crestana, S.; Cesareo, R.; Mascarenhas, S. Using A computed tomography miniscanner in soil science. Soil Sci. 1986, 142, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ahmed, S.; Klassen, T.N.; Keyes, S.; Daly, M.; Jones, D.L.; Mavrogordato, M.; Sinclair, I.; Roose, T. Imaging the interaction of roots and phosphate fertiliser granules using 4D X-ray tomography. Plant Soil 2015, 401, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pflugfelder, D.; Metzner, R.; van Dusschoten, D.; Reichel, R.; Jahnke, S.; Koller, R. Non-invasive imaging of plant roots in different soils using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Plant Methods 2017, 13, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bačić, G.; Ratković, S. NMR studies of radial exchange and distribution of water in maize roots: The relevance of modelling of exchange kinetics. J. Exp. Bot. 1987, 38, 1284–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Brown, D.P.; Pratum, T.K.; Bledsoe, C.; Ford, E.D.; Cothern, J.S.; Perry, D. Noninvasive studies of conifer roots: Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging of Douglas-fir seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 1991, 21, 1559–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Willatt, S.T.; Struss, R.G.; Taylor, H.M. In situ Root Studies Using Neutron Radiography. Agron. J. 1978, 70, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Furukawa, J.; Nakanishi, T.; Matsubayashi, M. Neutron radiography of a root growing in soil with vanadium. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 1999, 424, 116–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tötzke, C.; Kardjilov, N.; Manke, I.; Oswald, S.E. Capturing 3D water flow in rooted soil by ultra-fast neutron tomography. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zarebanadkouki, M.; Carminati, A.; Kaestner, A.; Mannes, D.; Morgano, M.; Peetermans, S.; Lehmann, E.; Trtik, P. On-the-fly neutron tomography of water transport into lupine roots. Phys. Procedia 2015, 69, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Moradi, A.B.; Carminati, A.; Vetterlein, D.; Vontobel, P.; Lehmann, E.; Weller, U.; Hopmans, J.W.; Vogel, H.-J.; Oswald, S.E. Three-dimensional visualization and quantification of water content in the rhizosphere. New Phytol. 2011, 192, 653–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mawodza, T.; Burca, G.; Casson, S.; Menon, M. Wheat root system architecture and soil moisture distribution in an aggregated soil using neutron computed tomography. Geoderma 2020, 359, 113988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, G.; Fukami, M.; Sekimoto, H. Influence of cadmium on mineral concentrations and yield components in wheat genotypes differing in Cd tolerance at seedling stage. Field Crop. Res. 2002, 77, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rahman, S.U.; Xuebin, Q.; Yasin, G.; Cheng, H.; Mehmood, F.; Zain, M.; Shehzad, M.; Ahmad, M.I.; Riaz, L.; Rahim, A.; et al. Role of silicon on root morphological characters of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants grown under Cd-contaminated nutrient solution. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2021, 43, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Berkelaar, E.; Hale, B. The relationship between root morphology and cadmium accumulation in seedlings of two durum wheat cultivars. Can. J. Bot. 2000, 78, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Khan, N.; Ahmad, I.; Singh, S.; Nazar, R. Variation in growth, photosynthesis and yield of five wheat cultivars exposed to cadmium stress. World J. Agric. Sci. 2006, 2, 223–226. [Google Scholar]
  52. Abbas, T.; Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Adrees, M.; Mahmood, A.; Zia-Ur-Rehman, M.; Ibrahim, M.; Arshad, M.; Qayyum, M.F. Biochar application increased the growth and yield and reduced cadmium in drought stressed wheat grown in an aged contaminated soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 148, 825–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ismael, M.A.; Elyamine, A.M.; Moussa, M.G.; Cai, M.; Zhao, X.; Hu, C. Cadmium in plants: Uptake, toxicity, and its interactions with selenium fertilizers. Metallomics 2019, 11, 255–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yan, B.; Nguyen, C.; Pokrovsky, O.; Candaudap, F.; Coriou, C.; Bussière, S.; Robert, T.; Cornu, J. Cadmium allocation to grains in durum wheat exposed to low Cd concentrations in hydroponics. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 184, 109592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Karaba, A.; Dixit, S.; Greco, R.; Aharoni, A.; Trijatmiko, K.R.; Marsch-Martinez, N.; Krishnan, A.; Nataraja, K.N.; Udayakumar, M.; Pereira, A. Improvement of water use efficiency in rice by expression of HARDY, an Arabidopsis drought and salt tolerance gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 15270–15275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mega, R.; Abe, F.; Kim, J.-S.; Tsuboi, Y.; Tanaka, K.; Kobayashi, H.; Sakata, Y.; Hanada, K.; Tsujimoto, H.; Kikuchi, J.; et al. Tuning water-use efficiency and drought tolerance in wheat using abscisic acid receptors. Nat. Plants 2019, 5, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Blum, A. Effective use of water (EUW) and not water-use efficiency (WUE) is the target of crop yield improvement under drought stress. Field Crop. Res. 2009, 112, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sinclair, T.R.; Devi, J.; Shekoofa, A.; Choudhary, S.; Sadok, W.; Vadez, V.; Riar, M.; Rufty, T. Limited-transpiration response to high vapor pressure deficit in crop species. Plant Sci. 2017, 260, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chaves, M.M.; Marôco, J.P.; Pereira, J.S. Understanding plant responses to drought—From genes to the whole plant. Funct. Plant Biol. 2003, 30, 239–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jaleel, C.A.; Manivannan, P.; Wahid, A.; Farooq, M.; Al-Juburi, H.J.; Somasundaram, R.; Panneerselvam, R. Drought stress in plants: A review on morphological characteristics and pigments composition. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2009, 11, 100–105. [Google Scholar]
  61. Baize, D.; Saby, N.; Deslais, W.; Bispo, A.; Feix, I. Analyses totales et pseudo-totales d’éléments en traces dans les sols. Principaux résultats et enseignements d’une collecte nationale. Étude Gest. Sols 2006, 13, 181–200. [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhao, X.; Luo, L.; Cao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Wu, W.; Lan, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Gao, S.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Genome-wide association analysis and QTL mapping reveal the genetic control of cadmium accumulation in maize leaf. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yaylalı-Abanuz, G. Heavy metal contamination of surface soil around Gebze industrial area, Turkey. Microchem. J. 2011, 99, 82–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Stolt, P.; Asp, H.; Hultin, S. Genetic variation in wheat cadmium accumulation on soils with different cadmium concentrations. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 2006, 192, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Riaz, M.; Kamran, M.; Fang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Cao, H.; Yang, G.; Deng, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Anastopoulos, I.; et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi-induced mitigation of heavy metal phytotoxicity in metal contaminated soils: A critical review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 402, 123919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Wali, M.; Fourati, E.; Hmaeid, N.; Ghabriche, R.; Poschenrieder, C.; Abdelly, C.; Ghnaya, T. NaCl alleviates Cd toxicity by changing its chemical forms of accumulation in the halophyte Sesuvium portulacastrum. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 10769–10777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Liu, K.; Lv, J.; He, W.; Zhang, H.; Cao, Y.; Dai, Y. Major factors influencing cadmium uptake from the soil into wheat plants. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 113, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Peijnenburg, W.J.; Zablotskaja, M.; Vijver, M.G. Monitoring metals in terrestrial environments within a bioavailability framework and a focus on soil extraction. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2007, 67, 163–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Fairbrother, A.; Wenstel, R.; Sappington, K.; Wood, W. Framework for metals risk assessment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2007, 68, 145–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hussain, B.; Ashraf, M.N.; Rahman, S.U.; Abbas, A.; Li, J.; Farooq, M. Cadmium stress in paddy fields: Effects of soil conditions and remediation strategies. Sci. Total. Environ. 2020, 754, 142188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Yin, X.; Jiang, Y.; Tan, Y.; Meng, X.; Sun, H.; Wang, N. Co-transport of graphene oxide and heavy metal ions in surface-modified porous media. Chemosphere 2018, 218, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Uddin, M.K. A review on the adsorption of heavy metals by clay minerals, with special focus on the past decade. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 308, 438–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sarwar, N.; Saifullah; Malhi, S.S.; Zia, M.H.; Naeem, A.; Bibi, S.; Farid, G. Role of mineral nutrition in minimizing cadmium accumulation by plants. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2010, 90, 925–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sebastian, A.; Prasad, M.N.V. Cadmium minimization in rice. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2013, 34, 155–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Guo, X.; Zhang, S.; Shan, X.; Luo, L.; Pei, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, T.; Xie, Y.; Gault, A. Characterization of Pb, Cu, and Cd adsorption on particulate organic matter in soil. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2006, 25, 2366–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Weng, L.; Temminghoff, E.J.M.; Lofts, S.; Tipping, E.; Van Riemsdijk, W.H. Complexation with dissolved organic matter and solubility control of heavy metals in a sandy soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 4804–4810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zeng, F.; Ali, S.; Zhang, H.; Ouyang, Y.; Qiu, B.; Wu, F.; Zhang, G. The influence of pH and organic matter content in paddy soil on heavy metal availability and their uptake by rice plants. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Shaghaleh, H.; Azhar, M.; Zia-ur-Rehman, M.; Hamoud, Y.A.; Hamad, A.A.A.; Usman, M.; Rizwan, M.; Yong, J.W.H.; Alharby, H.F.; Al-Ghamdi, A.J.; et al. Effects of agro based organic amendments on growth and cadmium uptake in wheat and rice crops irrigated with raw city effluents: Three years field study. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 344, 123365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. McCauley, A.; Jones, C.; Jacobsen, J. Soil pH and organic matter. Nutr. Manag. Modul. 2009, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  80. Almås, A.R.; Singh, B. Plant uptake of cadmium-109 and zinc-65 at different temperature and organic matter levels. J. Environ. Qual. 2001, 30, 869–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sharma, R.K.; Archana, G. Cadmium minimization in food crops by cadmium resistant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2016, 107, 66–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liu, C.; Yu, R.; Shi, G. Effects of drought on the accumulation and redistribution of cadmium in peanuts at different developmental stages. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2016, 63, 1049–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Xia, S.; Wang, X.; Su, G.; Shi, G. Effects of drought on cadmium accumulation in peanuts grown in a contaminated calcareous soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 18707–18717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Tracy, S.R.; Black, C.R.; Roberts, J.A.; Sturrock, C.; Mairhofer, S.; Craigon, J.; Mooney, S.J. Quantifying the impact of soil compaction on root system architecture in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) by X-ray micro-computed tomography. Ann. Bot. 2012, 110, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Popova, L.; van Dusschoten, D.; Nagel, K.A.; Fiorani, F.; Mazzolai, B. Plant root tortuosity: An indicator of root path formation in soil with different composition and density. Ann. Bot. 2016, 118, 685–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Atkinson, J.A.; Hawkesford, M.J.; Whalley, W.R.; Zhou, H.; Mooney, S.J. Soil strength influences wheat root interactions with soil macropores. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 43, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Materechera, S.A.; Dexter, A.R.; Alston, A.M. Penetration of very strong soils by seedling roots of different plant species. Plant Soil 1991, 135, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Watt, M.; McCully, M.E.; Kirkegaard, J.A. Soil strength and rate of root elongation alter the accumulation of Pseudomonas spp. and other bacteria in the rhizosphere of wheat. Funct. Plant Biol. 2003, 30, 483–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Clark, L.; Whalley, W.; Barraclough, P. How do roots penetrate strong soil? In Roots: The Dynamic Interface between Plants and the Earth; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2003; pp. 93–104. [Google Scholar]
  90. Shafi, M.; Zhang, G.; Bakht, J.; Khan, M.A.; Islam, U.; Khan, M.D.; Raziuddin, G. Effect of cadmium and salinity stresses on root morphology of wheat. Pak. J. Bot. 2010, 42, 2747–2754. [Google Scholar]
  91. Mawodza, T.; Menon, M.; Brooks, H.; Magdysyuk, O.V.; Burca, G.; Casson, S. Preferential wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Fielder) root growth in different sized aggregates. Soil Tillage Res. 2021, 212, 105054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Burca, G.; Kockelmann, W.; James, J.; Fitzpatrick, M. Modelling of an imaging beamline at the ISIS pulsed neutron source. J. Instrum. 2013, 8, P10001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hussain, A.; Larsson, H.; Kuktaite, R.; Johansson, E. Concentration of some heavy metals in organically grown primitive, old and modern wheat genotypes: Implications for human health. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part B 2012, 47, 751–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kornfält, K.; Andersson, M.; Daniel, E.; Persson, M. Kadmium i marken i sydöstra Skåne. In SGU Rapporter Och Meddelanden; Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning: Uppsala, Sweden, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  95. Yong, J.W.H.; Letham, D.S.; Wong, S.C.; Farquhar, G.D. Effects of root restriction on growth and associated cytokinin levels in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Funct. Plant Biol. 2010, 37, 974–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Field, C.; Merino, J.; Mooney, H.A. Compromises between water-use efficiency and nitrogen-use efficiency in five species of California evergreens. Oecologia 1983, 60, 384–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Yong, J.W.H.; Ng, Y.F.; Tan, S.N.; Chew, A.Y.L. Effect of fertilizer application on photosynthesis and oil yield of Jatropha curcas L. Photosynthetica 2010, 48, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wang, F.; Gao, J.; Yong, J.W.H.; Wang, Q.; Ma, J.; He, X. Higher atmospheric CO2 levels favor C3 plants over C4 plants in utilizing ammonium as a nitrogen Source. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 537443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Burca, G.; Nagella, S.; Clark, T.; Tasev, D.; Rahman, I.; Garwood, R.; Spencer, A.; Turner, M.; Kelleher, J. Exploring the potential of neutron imaging for life sciences on IMAT. J. Microsc. 2018, 272, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Mawodza, T. Plant-Soil Interactions: The Impact of Plant Water Use Efficiency on Root Architecture and Soil Structure. PhD. Thesis, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  101. Dierick, M.; Masschaele, B.; Van Hoorebeke, L. Octopus, a fast and user-friendly tomographic reconstruction package developed in LabView®. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2004, 15, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Vlassenbroeck, J.; Masschaele, B.; Cnudde, V.; Dierick, M.; Pieters, K.; Van Hoorebeke, L.; Jacobs, P. Octopus 8: A high performance tomographic reconstruction package for X-ray tube and synchrotron micro-CT. In Advances in X-ray Tomography for Geomaterials; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; pp. 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Team, R. RStudio: Integrated Development for R; RStudio. Inc.: Boston, MA, USA, 2015; p. 700. [Google Scholar]
Plants 13 00554 g001
Figure 1. Effects of Cd and Cd + drought on gas exchange parameters and plant development. (a) A/Ci curves of net photosynthesis (A) vs. intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) of plants grown at control (CSoil) and 60 mg/kg of Cd for both no drought (CdSoil) and during drought (CdDSoil); (b) A/Ci curves of plants grown in CSoil and at 120 mg/kg of Cd for both no drought (CdSoil) and during drought (CdDSoil); (c) wheat genotype Tramadur after 21 days of growth in CSoil, CdSoil (four days under 120 mg/kg of Cd), and CdDSoil (four days under 120 mg/kg of Cd); (d) stomatal conductance (g) at 400 µmol mol−1 of CO2 concentration and 1000 µmol m−2 s−1 of light intensity (Q) in CSoil, CdSoil, and CdDSoil under 60 mg/kg and 120 mg/kg of Cd; (e) transpiration rate (E) at 400 µmol mol−1 of CO2 concentration and 1000 µmol m−2 s−1 of Q in CSoil, CdSoil, and CdDSoil under two levels of Cd treatments; (f) instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE) at 400 µmol mol−1 of CO2 concentration and 1000 µmol m−2 s−1 of Q in CSoil, CdSoil, and CdDSoil under two levels of Cd treatments. All the data are presented in the form of mean values of three biological replicates accompanied with an error bar representing standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant difference detected using Tukey’s post hoc test at the level of p < 0.05 between the CSoil, CdSoil, and CdDSoil samples under the same Cd treatment level.
Figure 1. Effects of Cd and Cd + drought on gas exchange parameters and plant development. (a) A/Ci curves of net photosynthesis (A) vs. intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) of plants grown at control (CSoil) and 60 mg/kg of Cd for both no drought (CdSoil) and during drought (CdDSoil); (b) A/Ci curves of plants grown in CSoil and at 120 mg/kg of Cd for both no drought (CdSoil) and during drought (CdDSoil); (c) wheat genotype Tramadur after 21 days of growth in CSoil, CdSoil (four days under 120 mg/kg of Cd), and CdDSoil (four days under 120 mg/kg of Cd); (d) stomatal conductance (g) at 400 µmol mol−1 of CO2 concentration and 1000 µmol m−2 s−1 of light intensity (Q) in CSoil, CdSoil, and CdDSoil under 60 mg/kg and 120 mg/kg of Cd; (e) transpiration rate (E) at 400 µmol mol−1 of CO2 concentration and 1000 µmol m−2 s−1 of Q in CSoil, CdSoil, and CdDSoil under two levels of Cd treatments; (f) instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE) at 400 µmol mol−1 of CO2 concentration and 1000 µmol m−2 s−1 of Q in CSoil, CdSoil, and CdDSoil under two levels of Cd treatments. All the data are presented in the form of mean values of three biological replicates accompanied with an error bar representing standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant difference detected using Tukey’s post hoc test at the level of p < 0.05 between the CSoil, CdSoil, and CdDSoil samples under the same Cd treatment level.
Plants 13 00554 g001
Plants 13 00554 g002
Figure 2. Cd content in 21-day-old (four days under 120 mg/kg of Cd) durum wheat root and shoot samples (Tramadur) grown under Cd and Cd + drought stress in soil (CdSoil and CdDSoil) and sand (CdSand and CdDSand) (a), and dry weight of samples grown under control (CSoil and CSand), Cd stress (CdSoil and CdSand), and Cd + drought (CdDSoil and CdDSand) conditions (b). Different letters indicate significant difference detected using Tukey’s post hoc test at the level of p < 0.05 between CSoil, CdSoil, and CdDSoil samples in either root or shoot.
Figure 2. Cd content in 21-day-old (four days under 120 mg/kg of Cd) durum wheat root and shoot samples (Tramadur) grown under Cd and Cd + drought stress in soil (CdSoil and CdDSoil) and sand (CdSand and CdDSand) (a), and dry weight of samples grown under control (CSoil and CSand), Cd stress (CdSoil and CdSand), and Cd + drought (CdDSoil and CdDSand) conditions (b). Different letters indicate significant difference detected using Tukey’s post hoc test at the level of p < 0.05 between CSoil, CdSoil, and CdDSoil samples in either root or shoot.
Plants 13 00554 g002
Plants 13 00554 g003
Figure 3. The effects of cadmium (120 mg/kg) and drought treatments on wheat foliar chlorophyll characteristics. The foliar relative chlorophyll content measured as the soil plant analysis development (SPAD) value (a) and ratio of variable fluorescence to maximum fluorescence (Fv/Fm) value (b) of wheat genotype Tramadur grown in two media. The treatments were as follows: control (CSoil and CSand); Cd stress (CdSoil and CdSand); Cd + drought stress (CdDSoil and CdDSand). Different letters indicate significant difference detected using Tukey’s post hoc test at the level of p < 0.05 between treatments.
Figure 3. The effects of cadmium (120 mg/kg) and drought treatments on wheat foliar chlorophyll characteristics. The foliar relative chlorophyll content measured as the soil plant analysis development (SPAD) value (a) and ratio of variable fluorescence to maximum fluorescence (Fv/Fm) value (b) of wheat genotype Tramadur grown in two media. The treatments were as follows: control (CSoil and CSand); Cd stress (CdSoil and CdSand); Cd + drought stress (CdDSoil and CdDSand). Different letters indicate significant difference detected using Tukey’s post hoc test at the level of p < 0.05 between treatments.
Plants 13 00554 g003
Plants 13 00554 g004
Figure 4. The root volumes of two wheat genotypes, Duramonte and Tramadur, as evaluated using neutron computed tomography at 14 days after sowing in different growing media (a) and the 3D structure of genotype Duramonte (b,d) and genotype Tramadur (c,e) grown in either soil or sand.
Figure 4. The root volumes of two wheat genotypes, Duramonte and Tramadur, as evaluated using neutron computed tomography at 14 days after sowing in different growing media (a) and the 3D structure of genotype Duramonte (b,d) and genotype Tramadur (c,e) grown in either soil or sand.
Plants 13 00554 g004
Plants 13 00554 g005
Figure 5. The root volumes of wheat plants (genotype Tramadur) evaluated using neutron computed tomography at 16 days after sowing in different growing media (a) and the 3D structure highlighting the architecture of root samples in control (b,d) and under 120 mg/kg of Cd stress (c,e) grown in either soil or sand.
Figure 5. The root volumes of wheat plants (genotype Tramadur) evaluated using neutron computed tomography at 16 days after sowing in different growing media (a) and the 3D structure highlighting the architecture of root samples in control (b,d) and under 120 mg/kg of Cd stress (c,e) grown in either soil or sand.
Plants 13 00554 g005
Plants 13 00554 g006
Figure 6. Neutron computed tomography images of wheat plants (genotype Tramadur) showing the media and relative moisture distribution projections in soil (a) and sand (e). The reconstructed 3D images of soil (b) and sand (f), media + water (c,g), and water (d,h) in either soil or sand growing conditions.
Figure 6. Neutron computed tomography images of wheat plants (genotype Tramadur) showing the media and relative moisture distribution projections in soil (a) and sand (e). The reconstructed 3D images of soil (b) and sand (f), media + water (c,g), and water (d,h) in either soil or sand growing conditions.
Plants 13 00554 g006
Plants 13 00554 g007
Figure 7. Illustrations for the two-leaf system used in the gas exchange measurement and the combined leaf area used for calibration.
Figure 7. Illustrations for the two-leaf system used in the gas exchange measurement and the combined leaf area used for calibration.
Plants 13 00554 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lan, Y.; Burca, G.; Yong, J.W.H.; Johansson, E.; Kuktaite, R. New Insights into the Bio-Chemical Changes in Wheat Induced by Cd and Drought: What Can We Learn on Cd Stress Using Neutron Imaging? Plants 2024, 13, 554. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13040554

AMA Style

Lan Y, Burca G, Yong JWH, Johansson E, Kuktaite R. New Insights into the Bio-Chemical Changes in Wheat Induced by Cd and Drought: What Can We Learn on Cd Stress Using Neutron Imaging? Plants. 2024; 13(4):554. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13040554

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lan, Yuzhou, Genoveva Burca, Jean Wan Hong Yong, Eva Johansson, and Ramune Kuktaite. 2024. "New Insights into the Bio-Chemical Changes in Wheat Induced by Cd and Drought: What Can We Learn on Cd Stress Using Neutron Imaging?" Plants 13, no. 4: 554. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13040554

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop