Next Article in Journal
Detection of Moving Ships in Sequences of Remote Sensing Images
Previous Article in Journal
Aircraft Reconstruction in High-Resolution SAR Images Using Deep Shape Prior
Article Menu
Issue 11 (November) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2017, 6(11), 332; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6110332

Bibliometric Analysis of Global Remote Sensing Research during 2010–2015

1
Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
2
The National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100090, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 30 August 2017 / Revised: 18 October 2017 / Accepted: 26 October 2017 / Published: 1 November 2017
Full-Text   |   PDF [2255 KB, uploaded 1 November 2017]   |  

Abstract

Bibliometric analysis based on the Science Citation Index Expanded published by Thomson Scientific was carried out to identify the research status and future trends of remote sensing (RS) during 2010–2015. The analysis revealed the institutional, national, spatio-temporal, and categorical patterns in remote sensing research both from the WP (whole publications) viewpoint and the HCP (highly-cited publications) viewpoint. Statistical analysis results showed that remote sensing research almost doubled during 2010–2015. Environmental sciences comprised the most attractive subject category among remote sensing research. The International Journal of Remote Sensing was the most productive journal, and Remote Sensing of Environment published the most HCP among the 31 distributed journals. The productive ranking of countries was led by the U.S. both from the WP viewpoint and the HCP viewpoint, and CAS (Chinese Academy of Sciences) was the most productive institute both from the WP viewpoint and the HCP viewpoint with lower CPP (average number of citations per paper). Keyword analysis illustrated that model and algorithm research were the key points in RS during 2010–2015. RS data including Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), Landsat, synthetic aperture radar (SAR), and LiDAR (light detection and ranging) were the most frequently adopted, but the data usage of UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles) and small satellites will be promoted in the future. With the development of data acquisition abilities, big data issues will become the challenges and hotspots of RS research, and new algorithms will continue to emerge. View Full-Text
Keywords: remote sensing; bibliometric analysis; WP viewpoint; HCP viewpoint; CPP remote sensing; bibliometric analysis; WP viewpoint; HCP viewpoint; CPP
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, H.; Huang, M.; Qing, X.; Li, G.; Tian, C. Bibliometric Analysis of Global Remote Sensing Research during 2010–2015. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2017, 6, 332.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. EISSN 2220-9964 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top