Next Article in Journal
Simulation of Dynamic Urban Growth with Partial Least Squares Regression-Based Cellular Automata in a GIS Environment
Next Article in Special Issue
sgdm: An R Package for Performing Sparse Generalized Dissimilarity Modelling with Tools for gdm
Previous Article in Journal
Discovery of Transition Rules for Cellular Automata Using Artificial Bee Colony and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms in Urban Growth Modeling
Previous Article in Special Issue
Methodology for Evaluating the Quality of Ecosystem Maps: A Case Study in the Andes
Article Menu
Issue 12 (December) cover image

Export Article

Erratum published on 19 January 2017, see ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2017, 6(1), 22.

Open AccessArticle
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2016, 5(12), 242; doi:10.3390/ijgi5120242

Integrating Multiple Spatial Datasets to Assess Protected Areas: Lessons Learnt from the Digital Observatory for Protected Areas (DOPA)

Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Directorate for Sustainable Resources, Ispra 21027, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Duccio Rocchini and Wolfgang Kainz
Received: 23 September 2016 / Revised: 11 November 2016 / Accepted: 30 November 2016 / Published: 15 December 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spatial Ecology)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [3063 KB, uploaded 19 January 2017]   |  

Abstract

The Digital Observatory for Protected Areas (DOPA) has been developed to support the European Union’s efforts in strengthening our capacity to mobilize and use biodiversity data so that they are readily accessible to policymakers, managers, researchers and other users. Assessing protected areas for biodiversity conservation at national, regional and international scales implies that methods and tools are in place to evaluate characteristics such as the protected areas’ connectivity, their species assemblages (including the presence of threatened species), the uniqueness of their ecosystems, and the threats these areas are exposed to. Typical requirements for such analyses are data on protected areas, information on species distributions and threat status, and information on ecosystem distributions. By integrating all these global data consistently in metrics and indicators, the DOPA provides the means to allow end-users to evaluate protected areas individually but also to compare protected areas at the country and ecoregion level to, for example, identify potential priorities for further conservation research, action and funding. Since the metrics and indicators are available through web services, the DOPA further allows end-users to develop their own applications without requiring management of large databases and processing capacities. In addition to examples illustrating how the DOPA can be used as an aid to decision making, we discuss the lessons learnt in the development of this global biodiversity information system, and outline planned future developments for further supporting conservation strategies. View Full-Text
Keywords: biodiversity conservation; web services; protected areas; Aichi Target 11; EU Biodiversity Strategy biodiversity conservation; web services; protected areas; Aichi Target 11; EU Biodiversity Strategy
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Dubois, G.; Bastin, L.; Bertzky, B.; Mandrici, A.; Conti, M.; Saura, S.; Cottam, A.; Battistella, L.; Martínez-López, J.; Boni, M.; Graziano, M. Integrating Multiple Spatial Datasets to Assess Protected Areas: Lessons Learnt from the Digital Observatory for Protected Areas (DOPA). ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2016, 5, 242.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. EISSN 2220-9964 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top