Next Article in Journal
The Role of PGC-1α and Mitochondrial Biogenesis in Kidney Diseases
Next Article in Special Issue
Treating Cancers Using Nature’s Medicine: Significance and Challenges
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of a Direct Interaction between miR4749 and the Tumor Suppressor p53 by Fluorescence, FRET and Molecular Modeling
Previous Article in Special Issue
Therapeutic Potential of Plant Phenolic Acids in the Treatment of Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 10
Issue 2
10.3390/biom10020345
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antiproliferative Effect of Acridine Chalcone Is Mediated by Induction of Oxidative Stress

by
Peter Takac
1,2,
Martin Kello
1,*,
Maria Vilkova
3,
Janka Vaskova
4,
Radka Michalkova
1,
Gabriela Mojzisova
5 and
Jan Mojzis
1,*
1
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, 040 11 Kosice, Slovakia
2
Institute of Human and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, 041 81 Kosice, Slovakia
3
Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia
4
Department of Medical and Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia
5
Department of Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University, 040 01 Kosice, Slovakia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2020, 10(2), 345; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10020345
Submission received: 18 December 2019 / Revised: 14 February 2020 / Accepted: 19 February 2020 / Published: 22 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant-Derived Natural Compounds in the Management of Cancer: Significance and Challenges)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chalcones are naturally occurring phytochemicals with diverse biological activities including antioxidant, antiproliferative, and anticancer effects. Some studies indicate that the antiproliferative effect of chalcones may be associated with their pro-oxidant effect. In the present study, we evaluated contribution of oxidative stress in the antiproliferative effect of acridine chalcone 1C ((2 E)-3-(acridin-9-yl)-1-(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one) in human colorectal HCT116 cells. We demonstrated that chalcone 1C induced oxidative stress via increased reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (ROS/RNS) and superoxide production with a simultaneous weak adaptive activation of the cellular antioxidant defence mechanism. Furthermore, we also showed chalcone-induced mitochondrial dysfunction, DNA damage, and apoptosis induction. Moreover, activation of mitogen activated phosphokinase (MAPK) signalling pathway in 1C-treated cancer cells was also observed. On the other hand, co-treatment of cells with strong antioxidant, N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), significantly attenuated all of the above-mentioned effects of chalcone 1C, that is, decreased oxidant production, prevent mitochondrial dysfunction, DNA damage, and induction of apoptosis, as well as partially preventing the activation of MAPK signalling. Taken together, we documented the role of ROS in the antiproliferative/pro-apoptotic effects of acridine chalcone 1C. Moreover, these data suggest that this chalcone may be useful as a promising anti-cancer agent for treating colon cancer.

1. Introduction

Chalcone, (E)-1,3-diphenyl-2-propene-1-one, has been reported as being a precursor in flavonoid synthesis [1]. Similar to flavonoids, chalcones have already been documented as exhibiting several biological activities, including antioxidant [2], anti-inflammatory [3], antibacterial and antifungal [4], antiprotozooal [5], immunomodulatory [6], and antiangiogenic [7,8] effects. Furthermore, antiproliferative/antitumor activities of chalcones have also been intensively studied [9,10,11,12,13,14]. The available studies revealed multitargeted activity of chalcones including various kinases [15], microtubules [16], multidrug-resistance proteins [17], or different signalling pathways associated with cell survival or death [18,19]. Moreover, we and others have detected the ability of chalcones to inhibit cancer cell proliferation via cell cycle arrest [20,21,22,23].
As was mentioned above, chalcones possesses antioxidant properties. Oxidative stress can be involved in cellular dysfunction due to DNA, protein, or lipid damage [24]. Oxidative cell damage can be linked to diseases such as cancer or neurodegenerative, cardiovascular, or metabolic diseases [25,26,27] and chalcones are suggested to either prevent or slow progression of these chronic diseases [28,29,30].
On the other hand, chalcones, under certain circumstances, may act as oxidants [31], and this effect can be associated with their antitumor activity [32,33]. The pro-oxidant activity of chalcones may result from different mechanisms such as increase in superoxide formation [34], cellular glutathione (GSH) depletion [35], or generation of phenoxyl radicals [36].
In our previous paper, we documented the ability of acridine chalcone 1C ((2 E)-3-(acridin-9-yl)-1-(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one) to suppress growth of cancer cells in vitro [11]. In accordance with the above-mentioned pro-oxidative effect of chalcones, we hypothesized that antiproliferative effect of chalcone 1C can be associated with either reactive oxygen species (ROS) or reactive nitrogen species (RNS) formation. To verify our hypothesis, we aimed to elucidate the link between ROS/RNS and the antiproliferative effect of 1C in human colorectal carcinoma cells HCT116.
The results of our study indicated that antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects of 1C are free radical-dependent, and these effects were inhibited by a powerful antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Tested Compound

(2 E)-3-(Acridin-9-yl)-1-(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one (1C) was synthetized by Maria Vilkova (Faculty of Natural Sciences of the P.J. Šafarik University, Košice). The structure of compounds was confirmed by using 1H, 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), infrared (IR) spectroscopy, and mass spectrometry. The studied agent was dissolved in DMSO. The final concentration of DMSO in the culture medium was 0.02% and exhibited no cytotoxicity.

2.2. Cell Culture

Cell line HCT116 (human colorectal carcinoma) was cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Biosera, Kansas City, MO, USA). The growth medium was supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum and 1X HyClone antibiotic/antimycotic solution (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom). Cells were cultured in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2 in humidified air at 37 °C. Cell viability, estimated by trypan blue exclusion, was greater than 95% before each experiment.

2.3. Viability Test

The MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide)colorimetric test was used to determine the antiproliferative effect of 1C and N-acetylcysteine. HCT116 cells (5 × 103/well) were seeded in 96-well polystyrene microplates (SARSTEDT, Nümbrecht, Germany). Twenty-four hours after seeding, 1C final concentration (10 µM) and NAC (final concentration 0.3, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5 mM) or their combinations were added. After 72 h, cells were incubated with 10 μL of MTT (5 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich Chemie, Steinheim, Germany) at 37 °C. After an additional 4 h, insoluble formazan produced by metabolic reactions were dissolved by 100 μL of a 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate. Cell proliferation was evaluated by measuring the absorbance at wavelength 570 nm using the automated Cytation 3 Cell Imaging Multi-Mode Reader (Biotek, Winooski, VT, USA). Absorbance of control wells was taken as 1.0 = 100%, and the results were expressed as a fold/percentage of untreated control.

2.4. Flow Cytometry Analyses

2.4.1. Analysis of Cell Cycle

For flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle, floating and adherent HCT116 cells were harvested 24, 48, and 72 h after treatment (1C, 10 µM), then washed in cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), fixed in cold 70% ethanol, and kept at −20 °C overnight. Before each analysis, cells were washed in PBS, resuspended in staining solution (final concentration 0.2% Triton X-100, 0.5 mg/mL ribonuclease A and 0.025 mg/mL propidium iodide in 500 µL PBS (all Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA)), and incubated for 30 min in the dark at room temperature. The DNA content of stained cells was analysed using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA)).

2.4.2. Flow Cytometry Analysis of Free Radicals, Apoptosis, Signalling Pathways, and DNA Damage

HCT116 cells were seeded in Petri dishes and cultivated for 24 h in a complete medium with 10% FBS. Cells were treated with 1C (10 µM) or with N-acetylcysteine (2.5 mM) and their mutual combination at 1, 3, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h prior to analysis. The antioxidant NAC was used in mutual combination as pre-treatment for 30 min before 1C was added. Floating and adherent cells were harvested, washed in PBS, distributed for particular analysis, and stained before analysis (see Table 1). After 15 min incubation at room temperature in the dark, samples were put on ice and fluorescence changes were detected by a flow cytometer BD FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences). A minimum of 1 × 104 events were analysed per analysis.

2.5. Antioxidant Enzyme Activities and Glutathione Content Measurement

Both floating and adherent HCT116 cells were harvested at 1, 3, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h after treatment with 1C (10 µM), NAC (2.5 mM), or their mutual combination. The activity of glutathione reductase (GR; EC 1.6.4.2) was measured according to a modified method described by Carlberg and Mannervik [37]. Activity of glutathione peroxidase (GPx, EC 1.11.1.9) was measured according to Zagrodski et al. [38]. For detection of glutathione-S-transferase (GST, EC 2.5.1.18) activity, Glutathione S-Transferase Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) was used. Reduced glutathione (GSH) content was measured by the method originally described by Floreani et al. [39]. Assays were performed on an M 501 single beam UV/VIS spectrophotometer (Spectronic Camspec Ltd., Leeds, United Kingdom). All measured parameters were calculated per milligram or gram of protein determined using the bicinchoninic acid assay.

2.6. Western Blot Analysis

HCT116 cells were treated with compound 1C (10 µM), NAC (2.5 mM), or their mutual combinations for 24, 48, and 72 h. Protein lysates from HCT116 cells were prepared using a lysis buffer containing 1 mol/L Tris/HCl (pH 6.8), glycerol, 20% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulphate), and deionized H2O in the presence of PIC (protease inhibitor cocktail) and a process of sonication. The concentration of proteins was determined using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, United States) and measured using an automated Cytation 3 Cell Imaging Multi-Mode Reader (Biotek) at wavelength 570 nm. Forty micrograms of total cellular proteins were separated on SDS-PAA gel (12%) at 100 V for 2 h and electrotransferred onto PVDF Blotting Membrane (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, United States) at 200 mA for 2 h using a BioRad Mini Trans-Blot cell (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). The membrane was then blocked in 4% milk with TBS-Tween (pH 7.4) for 1 h at room temperature to minimize non-specific binding. After that, the membrane was incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. Immunoblotting was carried out with the antibodies stated below (Table 2). After incubation with primary antibodies, membranes were washed in TBS-Tween (3 × 5 min) and incubated with corresponding horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. After incubation and washing of membranes (3 × 5 min with TBS-Tween) the expression of selected proteins was detected by chemiluminescent ECL substrate (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) and MF-ChemiBIS 2.0 Imaging System (DNR Bio-Imaging Systems, Jerusalem, Israel).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis of the data was performed using standard procedures, with one-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni multiple comparisons test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered as being statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Viability of HCT116 Cells after 1C and NAC Treatment

To verify our hypothesis that the antiproliferative effect of 1C could be associated with free radical production, we analysed viability/proliferation of HCT116 cells exposed to 1C (10 µM) alone or in combination with NAC (0.3 mM, 0.5 mM, 1 mM, 1.5 mM, 2 mM, 2.5 mM). After 72 h of incubation, 1C significantly decreased HCT116 cell viability. However, when combined with NAC, the effect of 1C on cell proliferation was significantly attenuated. A significant protective effect of NAC was observed at the concentration range of 1.0–2.5 mM (Figure 1). These results suggest that NAC exhibits an antagonistic effect on 1C-induced decrease in cell viability. Moreover, NAC in used concentrations had no inhibitory effect on HCT116 cell proliferation (Figure 1B). For further experiments, 2.5 mM concentration of NAC was selected as non-toxic.

3.2. NAC and 1C-Induced Oxidative Stress

In order to verify the abovementioned hypothesis that the cytotoxic effect of 1C in HCT116 cells could be related to oxidative stress, we performed several analyses focused upon free radical production or antioxidant system activity.
The results presented in Figure 2A and Figure S1 show that ROS started to be increased from 6 h of treatment (p < 0.05) when compared to control (untreated cells). This trend continued after 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h of treatment (p < 0.05; p < 0.001). Opposite to ROS, we observed a moderate decrease in RNS (Figure 2B and Figure S1) production after 6 h of incubation (p < 0.05). On the other hand, significant increase in RNS production after 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h of treatment was observed (p < 0.01; p < 0.001). In order to find out how superoxide may contribute to 1C-induced cytotoxicity, we performed a direct measurement of superoxide anion levels after treatment with 1C (Figure 2C and Figure S1). Except in the first hour of incubation, treatment of HCT116 cells with 1C significantly increased production of superoxide (p < 0.05; p < 0.01 vs. control). In both cases, co-treatment of cells with NAC significantly decreased either ROS or superoxide production (p < 0.05; p < 0.01; or p < 0.001 vs. 1C treated cells).
Some of the well-known consequences of free radical generation are peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids and DNA damage. As our results showed (Figure 2D and Figure S1), treatment of HCT116 cells with 1C led to a significant increase in lipid peroxide level after 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h of incubation when compared to the control (p < 0.05; p < 0.01). No significant increase in lipoperoxide level was observed after shorter times of incubation (1, 3, and 6 h; Figure S1).
8-Oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoG) is the main product of oxidative DNA damage. Because of the clear correlation between free radical production and 8-oxoG creation, it is a frequently used cellular marker of oxidative stress. As shown in Figure 3, 1C significantly increased levels of 8-oxoG in all treatment periods (24, 48, and 72 h; p < 0.001). Compared with 1C treatment alone, NAC co-treatment at a dose of 2.5 mM significantly reduced some parameters of oxidative stress. Production of ROS and RNS was significantly decreased in 1C/NAC-treated after 24, 48, and 72 h of incubation (p < 0.05; p < 0.01). Similarly, significant reduction in lipid peroxides was observed in NAC-co-treated HCT116 cells (p < 0.01; p < 0.001). NAC also attenuated oxidative DNA damage. After 2.5 mM NAC addition, 8-oxoG level significantly decreased (p < 0.001) as compared with 1C alone treatment.
Furthermore, because oxidative stress is the result of pro-oxidants/antioxidants disbalance, we also studied effect of 1C on endogenous antioxidant status. Reduced glutathione and GSH-related enzymes play an important role in protection against reactive species produced during oxidative stress. As presented in Figure 4A and Table S1, the content of GSH in 1C-treated cells was biphasic, with the highest level after 6 and 48 h of treatment. In addition, decrease in GSH content was detected after 24 h of incubation. Activity of GSH-related enzyme was time-dependent. Treatment of HCT116 cells with 1C resulted in increased activity of GPx and GR after 24 h of incubation only. On the other hand, activity of GST was increased during the whole course (Figure 4B–D; Table S1). NAC modulated GSH content as well as activity of GSH-related enzymes. The content of GSH in 1C/NAC-treated cells was increased after 6 and 48 h of treatment and decreased after 24 h of treatment. This biphasic response was also observed in 1C-only-treated cells, however, combination with NAC increased content of GSH in a more appreciable manner. Moreover, NAC increased activity of GPx, GR, and GST when compared to 1C-treated cells.

3.3. Effect of NAC on Cell Cycle

We evaluated the cell cycle distribution of chalcone 1C-treated cells by flow cytometry. As shown in Figure 5 and Table 3, 1C induced a significant cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase after 24 h (p < 0.001) of incubation, and cell cycle progression was also arrested after 48 and 72 h of incubation (p < 0.01). Moreover, we also found a significant increase in number of cells with sub-G0/G1 DNA content, which is considered a marker of apoptosis (p < 0.01). Compared with 1C treatment alone, NAC (2.5 mM) co-treatment completely prevented G2/M cell cycle arrest. In addition, NAC also significantly reduced number of cells with sub-G0/G1 DNA content.
Overall, results of cell cycle analysis suggested that ROS production participated in G2/M phase arrest.
Because the analysis of the cell cycle showed the participation of free radicals in 1C-induced apoptosis, we provided a set of following experiments to study the detailed role of ROS (free radicals) in cell death processes.

3.4. Effect of NAC on the Presence of Apoptotic Markers

Execution of apoptosis results in the consecutive display of different biochemical markers including phosphatidylserine externalization, release of pro-apoptotic proteins, and caspase activation.

3.4.1. Phosphatidylserine Externalization

To explain the association between oxidative stress and 1C-induced cell death, double annexin V/PI (propidium iodide) staining was used, and measurements were conducted after incubation of HCT116 cells with 1C, NAC, or both. As depicted in Figure 6 and Table 4, 1C significantly reduced the percentage of living cells after 24 h of incubation, and this effect was noticed also after 48 and 72 h incubation (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the increase in the population of apoptotic and dead cells was also observed. However, compared with that in groups treated with 1C alone, the number of living cells significantly increased with the concomitant decrease of apoptotic and dead cells after co-treatment with NAC (p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001).

3.4.2. Cytochrome c and Smac/DIABLO Release

One of key apoptotic events is the release of cytochrome c and Smac/DIABLO from mitochondria to cytosol. Incubation of HCT116 cells with 1C led to a significant release of both cytochrome c and Smac/DIABLO protein after 24, 48, and 72 h of treatment. Release of both proteins was significantly attenuated by NAC co-treatment in all time periods studied (p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001) indicated role of free radicals in mitochondrial membrane permeabilization and apoptosis induction (Figure 7A,B).

3.4.3. Caspase-3 and -7 Activation

After releasing into the cytosol, cytochrome c forms apoptosome with subsequent activation of caspase-3 and -7 (executioner caspases), which mediate many features of apoptosis. As we found, treatment of HCT116 cells with 1C led to significant activation of caspase-3 in all time periods (p < 0.01; p < 0.001). On the other hand, significant suppression of caspase-3 activation was seen in 1C/NAC co-treated cells (p < 0.5 and p < 0.01 vs. cells treated with 1C alone) (Figure 7C). Moreover, Western blot analysis also showed that 1C increased levels of cleaved (activated) caspase-7, mainly after 48 and 72 h treatment, and NAC was able to abolish this effect (Figure 7D).

3.4.4. PARP Cleavage

The activation of caspase-3 and -7 has been confirmed by the cleavage of PARP (substrate for caspases) using Western blot analysis. The level of cleaved PARP in 1C-treated HCT116 cells increased (48 and 72 h of incubation) as shown in Figure 7D, indicating the activation of caspase-dependent apoptosis. This analysis also revealed that the levels of cleaved PARP were markedly suppressed in NAC-co-treated HCT116 cells.

3.5. Effect of NAC on 1C-Induced Mitochondrial Dysfunction, Bcl-2 Phosphorylation, and DNA Damage

3.5.1. Mitochondrial Membrane Potential

It is well known that mitochondria are involved in the regulation of various functions related to cell survival or cell death. Mitochondrial membrane potential plays crucial role in mitochondria homeostasis, and long-lasting drop of it may be associated with apoptosis. As shown in Figure 8, we observed a significant decrease of MMP in chalcone 1C-treated HCT116 cells (p < 0.01; p < 0.001). By contrast, 1C/NAC co-treatment completely rescued HCT116 cells from mitochondrial membrane potential collapse (p < 0.01, p < 0.001 vs. 1C alone).

3.5.2. Bcl-2 Phosphorylation

The function of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 protein depends on phosphorylation status, and Bcl-2 phosphorylation suppresses its anti-apoptotic activity. Treatment of HCT116 cells with 1C led to a significant increase in phosphorylation of Bcl-2, thus enabling the initiation of intrinsic apoptotic cascade. In contrast to 1C, addition of NAC completely abolished Bcl-2 phosphorylation, thus preventing further apoptotic events (p < 0.001 vs. 1C alone) (Figure 9).

3.5.3. DNA Damage

Xenobiotic-induced DNA damage often leads to activation of DNA repair machinery including histone H2A.X, ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated kinase), and SMC1 protein (structural maintenance of chromosomes 1). Our results showed activation (i.e., phosphorylation) of all of the aforementioned markers of DNA damage (p < 0.01; p < 0.001) in 1C-treated cells (Figure 10A–D). Similarly to our previous experiments, co-treatment of HCT116 cells with 1C/NAC significantly prevented phosphorylation of all proteins (p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001 vs. 1C alone).

3.6. Phosphorylation of p38 MAPK, JNK, and ERK1/2 Was Reduced by NAC

Because mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway plays an important role in apoptosis regulation, we investigated the effect of 1C on the MAPK pathway proteins, including p38 MAPK, JNK, and ERK1/2 (Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2).
Findings of flow cytometry as well as Western blot analysis revealed that treatment of HCT116 cells with 1C induced an increase of the phosphorylated form of MAPK proteins at specific times (mainly after 48 and 72 h of incubation) compared to control (Figure 11A–D). However, partial reduction of MAPK protein phosphorylation was detected when NAC was used. This effect was significant after 48 and 72 h of treatment (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 vs. 1C alone).

4. Discussion

Although free radicals are involved in several physiological functions [40], uncontrolled ROS production in cells can lead to oxidative stress followed by damage of biomacromolecules, including DNA, proteins, or lipids, resulting in cell death [41]. Oxidative stress has also been linked to several diseases such as diabetes mellitus, neurodegenerative and cardiovascular diseases, and cancer [42]. Besides the endogenous antioxidant system, exogenous antioxidants, mainly phytochemicals, play an important role in the protection of cells and tissues against oxidative stress [43]. Among phytochemicals, polyphenols have been intensively studied in recent years due to their antioxidant properties [44,45]. However, in recent years, some studies have documented pro-oxidant activity of several antioxidants including polyphenols [46,47]. As was mentioned above, increased production of ROS can lead to oxidative stress and even to cell death. It should be noted that cancer cells, due to higher concentration of some ions and greater metabolic activity [48,49], are more susceptible to oxidative stress in comparison with non-cancer cells, and this phenomenon explains the higher sensitivity of cancer cells to pro-oxidants [50].
Chalcones have attracted researchers’ attention as potential anticancer compounds because of their multi-target action together with simple chemistry, as well as their low toxicity [17]. Recently, we documented excellent antiproliferative action of 1C acridine chalcone in HCT116 cells [11]. In the last decade, some articles indicated a relationship between the antiproliferative effect and induction of oxidative stress in both natural and synthetic chalcones [51,52,53,54]. This fact prompted us to evaluate the role of ROS/RNS in the antiproliferative and proapoptotic effect of chalcone 1C.
Our results showed that co-treatment of HCT116 cells with 1C and antioxidant NAC significantly attenuated 1C-induced decrease of cancer cell survival. Because this finding indicates possible involvement of free radicals in 1C action, we further evaluated some parameters of oxidative stress.
Firstly, we detected increased levels of ROS after 24, 48, and 72 h of treatment. Moreover, using specific indicators, we also detected higher concentrations of superoxide and nitric oxide (NO). It has been demonstrated that reaction of NO and superoxide resulted in production of peroxynitrite, a highly reactive oxidant that is probably responsible for cytotoxicity both of these oxidants [55,56]. Interaction of peroxynitrite with membrane polyunsaturated fatty acids often results in lipid peroxidation [57]. In line with this evidence, we also detected significant increase of lipid peroxides in 1C-treated cells.
Secondly, because oxidative stress is a result of imbalance between pro-oxidants and antioxidants, we further evaluated effect of 1C on the intracellular antioxidant defence mechanism. Treatment of HCT116 with 1C significantly influenced GSH, GRH, and GPx. We found a biphasic effect of 1C on GSH levels, with a significant decrease after 24 h of incubation. This decrease of GSH levels was associated with increased activity of GR. Because GR catalyses reduction of oxidized glutathione to GSH [58], we suggest that the increase in GR activity could be an adaptive cellular mechanism to GSH depletion. Moreover, in the same time of incubation, we detected the highest increase in lipid peroxide production and increase in GPx activity. Because the role of GPx is to catalyse reduction of different peroxides including lipid peroxides [59], increase in GPx activity may be a consequence of lipid peroxide overproduction.
On the basis of the aforementioned findings, we considered the fact that increased generation of free radicals and simultaneous weak adaptive activation of endogenous antioxidant system results in oxidative stress and subsequent cell death. Our hypothesis also supports the fact that the addition of NAC significantly decreases the antiproliferative potential of 1C and increases cell survival.
In addition to lipid peroxidation, ROS can also induce DNA damage [60]. Accordingly, in 1C-treated cells, we observed significant increase of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine, the oxidation product of guanine, which is considered as a marker of oxidative damage of DNA [61].
Damage of DNA usually results in activation of the DNA damage response (DDR) system, which involves DNA damage detection, cell cycle arrest, and activation of repair mechanisms, followed by survival or cell death [62]. The key role in DDR is played by H2A.X, which is activated by phosphorylated ATM. Activated, that is, phosphorylated H2A.X (termed γ-H2A.X) is important for recruitment of repair proteins to DNA damage sites. Moreover, it is also considered as an indicator of DNA double-strand breaks [63]. Several genotoxic agents that cause DNA double-strand breaks, such as anthracycline antibiotics, cisplatin, or etoposide, facilitate γ-H2A.X formation. In addition, another component of DDR network phosphorylated by ATM is the SMC1 protein [64]. In the present work, we observed activation of these DDR components in 1C-treated cells indicating DNA damage. Together with the observation that 1C increased 8-oxoG levels and NAC significantly prevented either 8-oxoG production or activation of DDR markers, we suggest that 1C induced oxidative damage of DNA. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study reporting that chalcone induces oxidative DNA damage in colorectal cancer cells. Recently, Gil and co-workers [65] presented ROS-mediated DNA damage in human lung cancer cells, which support our findings related to role of ROS in the antiproliferative effect of chalcones.
A significant amount of damage from biomacromolecules, caused by oxidants, can lead to cell death [66]. Results shown in this paper, together with our recently published data [11], suggest that chalcone 1C induces apoptosis associated with mitochondrial dysfunction. Today, it is without doubt that mitochondria play an important role in apoptosis. Permeabilization of the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM) allows translocation of proteins localized in the intermembrane space to cytosol with subsequent caspase activation and apoptotic cell death [67]. In the present work, we found a significant increase of cytoplasmatic levels of cytochrome c, Smac/DIABLO, and activation of executioner caspase-3 and -7. Once cytochrome c is released, binds to apoptotic protease-activating factor 1 (APAF-1) in the presence of deoxyadenosine triphosphate to form the apoptosome [68] with subsequent activation of downstream effector caspases and initiation of apoptosis. In addition, Smac/DIABLO protein, by inhibiting of IAP (inhibitor of apoptosis protein) function, allows caspases to activate apoptosis [69]. Permeabilization of MOM is regulated by pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins of the Bcl-2 family. For example, it has been demonstrated that over-expression Bcl-2 blocks the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria to cytosol and prevents cell death [70]. Our experiments showed increased levels of phosphorylated anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 protein, which led to loss of its function.
Apoptotic machinery can be activated in response to different stimuli, and ROS are one form of them [71]. The results presented here clearly documented the role of ROS in 1C-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis. The addition of antioxidant NAC to HCT116 cancer cells decreased the release of cytochrome c and Smac/DIABLO proteins, activation of caspase-3 and -7, and PARP cleavage, as well as phosphorylation of Bcl-2 proteins. Moreover, NAC almost completely prevented 1C-induced loss of mitochondrial membrane potential. Although it is not clear if loss of MMP is an early event or consequence in apoptosis, it is broadly accepted that decrease of MMP can be associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis as well [72].
It has been shown that MAPKs are involved in regulation of many cellular processes including cell growth, survival, and apoptosis [73].
It has been suggested that JNK phosphorylation activates apoptosis in response to different types of stress [74]. Moreover, the ability of activated JNK to release pro-apoptotic proteins such as cytochrome c and Smac/DIABLO has also been documented [75]. Similarly to JNK, phosphorylation of p38 also can be involved in apoptosis [76]. Moreover, although it is commonly accepted that the phosphorylation of the ERK pathway leads to cell proliferation, activation of ERK1/2 can also be involved in apoptosis [77]. Our results are consistent with aforementioned findings, as we found increased phosphorylation of all three members of MAPK signalling pathway in 1C-treated cancer cells.
Furthermore, the involvement of ROS in activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) pathway has been proposed [78]. Our results support this hypothesis. As shown here, co-treatment of cells with NAC significantly decreased phosphorylation of p38 MAPK, ERK1/2, and JNK and partially suppressed activation of apoptosis machinery and decreased 1C-induced cell death. These results are in agreement with those published by Wang et al. [79], who found that new chalcone SL-4 induced apoptosis in human cancer cells through increased production of ROS and activation of the MAPK signalling pathway.

5. Conclusions

Our study showed that acridine chalcone 1C has an antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effect against colorectal cancer HCT116 cells through ROS generation. Mechanistically, 1C increased ROS production with concomitant mitochondrial dysfunction associated with loss of MMP, release of cytochrome c, and Smac/DIABLO proteins with subsequent caspase-3 and -7 activation and apoptosis. Moreover, treatment of HCT116 cells with 1C led to the activation of the MAPK signalling pathways.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/10/2/345/s1; Figure S1: Representative flow cytometry histograms of free radicals production in HCT116 cells after 1C and 22 NAC/1C treatment; Table S1: Antioxidant status of HCT116 cells after 1C, NAC and NAC/1C treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.M.; data curation, M.K.; formal analysis, M.K.; investigation, P.T., M.K., M.V., J.V., R.M., and G.M.; methodology, P.T.; project administration, J.M.; resources, G.M. and J.M.; writing—original draft preparation, P.T.; writing—review and editing, J.M. All authors have read and agree to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present study was supported in part by the Grant Agency of Ministry of the Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic (VEGA 1/0653/19, VEGA 1/0753/17, and VEGA 1/0018/16), and the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract no. APVV-16-0446. Moreover, this publication is the result of the project implementation: “Medicínsky univerzitný vedecký park v Košiciach (MediPark, Košice-Fáza II.)”, kód ITMS2014 + 313011D103, supported by the Operational Programme Research and Innovation, funded by the ERDF.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Ferreyra, M.L.F.; Rius, S.; Fernie, A.R. Flavonoids: Biosynthesis, biological functions, and biotechnological applications. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 222. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sökmen, M.; Khan, M.A. The antioxidant activity of some curcuminoids and chalcones. Inflammopharmacology 2016, 24, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Mahapatra, D.K.; Bharti, S.K.; Asati, V. Chalcone Derivatives: Anti-inflammatory Potential and Molecular Targets Perspectives. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2017, 17, 3146–3169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tratrat, C.; Haroun, M.; Xenikakis, I.; Liaras, K.; Tsolaki, E.; Eleftheriou, P.; Petrou, A.; Aldhubiab, B.; Attimarad, M.; Venugopala, K.N.; et al. Design, Synthesis, Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity and Docking Studies of New Thiazole-based Chalcones. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2019, 19, 356–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Trein, M.R.; Oliveira, L.R.E.; Rigo, G.V.; Garcia, M.A.R.; Petro-Silveira, B.; Trentin, D.D.S.; Macedo, A.J.; Regasini, L.O.; Tasca, T. Anti-Trichomonas vaginalis activity of chalcone and amino-analogues. Parasitol. Res. 2018, 118, 607–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fontes, L.B.A.; Dias, D.D.S.; De Carvalho, L.S.A.; Mesquita, H.L.; Reis, L.D.S.; Dias, A.T.; Filho, A.A.D.S.; Corrêa, J.O.D.A. Immunomodulatory effects of licochalcone A on experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2014, 66, 886–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mirossay, L.; Varinska, L.; Mojzis, J. Antiangiogenic Effect of Flavonoids and Chalcones: An Update. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 19, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Varinska, L.; Van Wijhe, M.; Belleri, M.; Mitola, S.M.F.; Perjesi, P.; Presta, M.; Koolwijk, P.; Ivanová, L.; Mojzis, J. Anti-angiogenic activity of the flavonoid precursor 4-hydroxychalcone. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 691, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Champelovier, P.; Chauchet, X.; Puch, F.; Vergnaud, S.; Garrel, C.; Laporte, F.; Boutonnat, J.; Boumendjel, A. Cellular and molecular mechanisms activating the cell death processes by chalcones: Critical structural effects. Toxicol. In Vitro 2013, 27, 2305–2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Rozmer, Z.; Berki, T.; Maász, G.; Perjesi, P. Different effects of two cyclic chalcone analogues on redox status of Jurkat T cells. Toxicol. In Vitro 2014, 28, 1359–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Takac, P.; Kello, M.; Pilatova, M.B.; Kudlickova, Z.; Vilkova, M.; Slepcikova, P.; Petik, P.; Mojzis, J. New chalcone derivative exhibits antiproliferative potential by inducing G2/M cell cycle arrest, mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis and modulation of MAPK signalling pathway. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2018, 292, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Varghese, E.; Samuel, S.M.; Abotaleb, M.; Cheema, S.; Mamtani, R.; Büsselberg, D. The “Yin and Yang” of Natural Compounds in Anticancer Therapy of Triple-Negative Breast Cancers. Cancers 2018, 10, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Winter, E.; Chiaradia-Delatorre, L.D.; Silva, E.; Nunes, R.J.; Yunes, R.A.; Creczynski-Pasa, T.B. Involvement of extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways together with endoplasmic reticulum stress in cell death induced by naphthylchalcones in a leukemic cell line: Advantages of multi-target action. Toxicol. In Vitro 2014, 28, 769–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Yan, W.; Xiangyu, C.; Ya, L.; Yu, W.; Feng, X. An orally antitumor chalcone hybrid inhibited HepG2 cells growth and migration as the tubulin binding agent. Investig. New Drugs 2019, 37, 784–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ma, Y.-C.; Wang, Z.-X.; Jin, S.-J.; Zhang, Y.-X.; Hu, G.-Q.; Cui, D.-T.; Wang, J.-S.; Wang, M.; Wang, F.-Q.; Zhao, Z.-J. Dual Inhibition of Topoisomerase II and Tyrosine Kinases by the Novel Bis-Fluoroquinolone Chalcone-Like Derivative HMNE3 in Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0162821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Cong, H.; Zhao, X.; Castle, B.T.; Pomeroy, E.J.; Zhou, B.; Lee, J.; Wang, Y.; Bian, T.; Miao, Z.; Zhang, W.; et al. An Indole–Chalcone Inhibits Multidrug-Resistant Cancer Cell Growth by Targeting Microtubules. Mol. Pharm. 2018, 15, 3892–3900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mahapatra, D.K.; Bharti, S.K.; Asati, V. Anti-cancer chalcones: Structural and molecular target perspectives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 98, 69–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Sun, Q.; Chen, M.; Liu, S.; Zou, X. Licochalcone A suppresses hexokinase 2-mediated tumor glycolysis in gastric cancer via downregulation of the Akt signaling pathway. Oncol. Rep. 2017, 39, 1181–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wu, M.-H.; Chiu, Y.-F.; Wu, W.-J.; Wu, P.-L.; Lin, C.-Y.; Lin, C.-L.; Hsieh, Y.-H.; Liu, C.-J. Synergistic antimetastatic effect of cotreatment with licochalcone A and sorafenib on human hepatocellular carcinoma cells through the inactivation of MKK4/JNK and uPA expression. Environ. Toxicol. 2018, 33, 1237–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Drutovic, D.; Chripkova, M.; Pilátová, M.; Kruzliak, P.; Perjesi, P.; Šarišský, M.; Lupi, M.; Damia, G.; Broggini, M.; Mojzis, J. Benzylidenetetralones, cyclic chalcone analogues, induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in HCT116 colorectal cancer cells. Tumor Biol. 2014, 35, 9967–9975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kello, M.; Drutovic, D.; Pilatova, M.B.; Tischlerova, V.; Perjesi, P.; Mojzis, J. Chalcone derivatives cause accumulation of colon cancer cells in the G2/M phase and induce apoptosis. Life Sci. 2016, 150, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Riaz, S.; Iqbal, M.; Ullah, R.; Zahra, R.; Chotana, G.A.; Faisal, A.; Saleem, R. Synthesis and evaluation of novel α-substituted chalcones with potent anti-cancer activities and ability to overcome multidrug resistance. Bioorganic Chem. 2019, 87, 123–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhuang, X.; Dong, A.; Wang, R.; Cao, H. Ursolic acid benzaldehyde chalcone, leads to inhibition of cell proliferation and arrests cycle in G1/G0 phase in colon cancer. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 25, 1762–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Martindale, J.L.; Holbrook, N.J. Cellular response to oxidative stress: Signaling for suicide and survival. J. Cell. Physiol. 2002, 192, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kamat, P.K.; Kalani, A.; Rai, S.; Swarnkar, S.; Tota, S.; Nath, C.; Tyagi, N. Mechanism of Oxidative Stress and Synapse Dysfunction in the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease: Understanding the Therapeutics Strategies. Mol. Neurobiol. 2014, 53, 648–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Rani, V.; Deep, G.; Singh, R.; Palle, K.; Yadav, U.C. Oxidative stress and metabolic disorders: Pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies. Life Sci. 2016, 148, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Saha, S.K.; Bin Lee, S.; Won, J.; Choi, H.Y.; Kim, K.; Yang, G.-M.; Dayem, A.A.; Cho, S.-G. Correlation between Oxidative Stress, Nutrition, and Cancer Initiation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Kwak, J.; Kim, M.-J.; Choi, K.-C.; Choi, H.-K.; Jun, W.; Park, H.-J.; Lee, Y.-H.; Yoon, H.-G. The chalcone derivative Chana 1 protects against amyloid beta peptide-induced oxidative stress and cognitive impairment. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2012, 30, 193–198. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mahapatra, D.K.; Asati, V.; Bharti, S.K. Chalcones and their therapeutic targets for the management of diabetes: Structural and pharmacological perspectives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 92, 839–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mahapatra, D.K.; Bharti, S.K. Therapeutic potential of chalcones as cardiovascular agents. Life Sci. 2016, 148, 154–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lau, J.T.F.; Jiang, X.-J.; Zhou, Y.; Lo, P.-C. A disulfide-linked conjugate of ferrocenyl chalcone and silicon(iv) phthalocyanine as an activatable photosensitiser. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 4274–4276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hseu, Y.-C.; Huang, Y.-C.; Thiyagarajan, V.; Mathew, D.; Lin, K.-Y.; Chen, S.-C.; Liu, J.-Y.; Hsu, L.-S.; Li, M.-L.; Yang, H.-L. Anticancer activities of chalcone flavokawain B from Alpinia pricei Hayata in human lung adenocarcinoma (A549) cells via induction of reactive oxygen species-mediated apoptotic and autophagic cell death. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 17514–17526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhang, S.; Li, T.; Zhang, L.; Wang, X.; Dong, H.; Li, L.; Fu, D.; Li, Y.; Zi, X.; Liu, H.-M.; et al. A novel chalcone derivative S17 induces apoptosis through ROS dependent DR5 up-regulation in gastric cancer cells. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Strathmann, J.; Klimo, K.; Sauer, S.W.; Okun, J.G.; Prehn, J.H.; Gerhauser, C. Xanthohumol-induced transient superoxide anion radical formation triggers cancer cells into apoptosis via a mitochondria-mediated mechanism. FASEB J. 2010, 24, 2938–2950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Guzy, J.; Kubálková, J.; Rozmer, Z.; Fodor, K.; Mareková, M.; Poškrobová, M.; Perjesi, P. Activation of oxidative stress response by hydroxyl substituted chalcones and cyclic chalcone analogues in mitochondria. FEBS Lett. 2009, 584, 567–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Chan, T.S.; Galati, G.; Pannala, A.S.; Rice-Evans, C.; O’Brien, P.J. Simultaneous detection of the antioxidant and pro-oxidant activity of dietary polyphenolics in a peroxidase system. Free. Radic. Res. 2003, 37, 787–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Carlberg, I.; Mannervik, B. Glutathione reductase. Methods Enzymol. 1985, 113, 484–490. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zagrodzki, P.; Nicol, F.; McCoy, M.A.; Smyth, J.; Kennedy, D.; Beckett, G.; Arthur, J. Iodine deficiency in cattle: Compensatory changes in thyroidal selenoenzymes. Res. Vet. Sci. 1998, 64, 209–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Floreani, M.; Petrone, M.; Debetto, P.; Palatini, P. A comparison between different methods for the determination of reduced and oxidized glutathione in mammalian tissues. Free. Radic. Res. 1997, 26, 449–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Niki, E. Oxidative stress and antioxidants: Distress or eustress? Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2016, 595, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kehrer, J.P.; Klotz, L.-O. Free radicals and related reactive species as mediators of tissue injury and disease: Implications for Health. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2015, 45, 765–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Pizzino, G.; Irrera, N.; Cucinotta, M.; Pallio, G.; Mannino, F.; Arcoraci, V.; Squadrito, F.; Altavilla, D.; Bitto, A. Oxidative Stress: Harms and Benefits for Human Health. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chikara, S.; Nagaprashantha, L.D.; Singhal, J.; Horne, D.; Awasthi, S.; Singhal, S.S. Oxidative stress and dietary phytochemicals: Role in cancer chemoprevention and treatment. Cancer Lett. 2018, 413, 122–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bubols, G.B.; Vianna, D.d.R.; Medina-Remon, A.; von Poser, G.; Lamuela-Raventos, R.M.; Eifler-Lima, V.L.; Garcia, S.C. The antioxidant activity of coumarins and flavonoids. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2013, 13, 318–334. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Leskovec, J.; Rezar, V.; Svete, A.N.; Salobir, J.; Levart, A. Antioxidative Effects of Olive Polyphenols Compared to Vitamin E in Piglets Fed a Diet Rich in N-3 PUFA. Animals 2019, 9, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Eghbaliferiz, S.; Iranshahi, M. Prooxidant Activity of Polyphenols, Flavonoids, Anthocyanins and Carotenoids: Updated Review of Mechanisms and Catalyzing Metals. Phytother. Res. 2016, 30, 1379–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. León-González, A.J.; Auger, C.; Schini-Kerth, V.B. Pro-oxidant activity of polyphenols and its implication on cancer chemoprevention and chemotherapy. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2015, 98, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. DeBerardinis, R.J.; Chandel, N.S. Fundamentals of cancer metabolism. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1600200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Gupte, A.; Mumper, R.J. Elevated copper and oxidative stress in cancer cells as a target for cancer treatment. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2009, 35, 32–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Weisburg, J.H.; Weissman, D.B.; Sedaghat, T.; Babich, H. In vitro Cytotoxicity of Epigallocatechin Gallate and Tea Extracts to Cancerous and Normal Cells from the Human Oral Cavity. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2004, 95, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fu, D.-J.; Li, J.-H.; Yang, J.-J.; Li, P.; Zhang, Y.-B.; Liu, S.; Li, Z.-R.; Zhang, S.-Y. Discovery of novel chalcone-dithiocarbamates as ROS-mediated apoptosis inducers by inhibiting catalase. Bioorganic Chem. 2019, 86, 375–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kuete, V.; Nkuete, A.H.L.; Mbaveng, A.T.; Wiench, B.; Wabo, H.K.; Tane, P.; Efferth, T. Cytotoxicity and modes of action of 4′-hydroxy-2′,6′-dimethoxychalcone and other flavonoids toward drug-sensitive and multidrug-resistant cancer cell lines. Phytomedicine 2014, 21, 1651–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Li, K.; Zheng, Q.; Chen, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, D.; Wang, J. Isobavachalcone Induces ROS-Mediated Apoptosis via Targeting Thioredoxin Reductase 1 in Human Prostate Cancer PC-3 Cells. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2018, 2018, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Wei, S.; Sun, T.; Du, J.; Zhang, B.; Xiang, D.; Li, W. Xanthohumol, a prenylated flavonoid from Hops, exerts anticancer effects against gastric cancer invitro. Oncol. Rep. 2018, 40, 3213–3222. [Google Scholar]
  55. Pacher, P.; Beckman, J.S.; Liaudet, L. Nitric oxide and peroxynitrite in health and disease. Physiol. Rev. 2007, 87, 315–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Radi, R. Peroxynitrite, a Stealthy Biological Oxidant. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 26464–26472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Radi, R. Oxygen radicals, nitric oxide, and peroxynitrite: Redox pathways in molecular medicine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 5839–5848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. El-Aal, H.A.H.M.A. Lipid Peroxidation End-Products as a Key of Oxidative Stress: Effect of Antioxidant on Their Production and Transfer of Free Radicals. Lipid Peroxidation 2012, 10, 63–88. [Google Scholar]
  59. Gaschler, M.M.; Stockwell, B.R. Lipid peroxidation in cell death. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 482, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chang, Y.-T.; Huang, C.-Y.; Tang, J.-Y.; Liaw, C.-C.; Li, R.-N.; Liu, J.-R.; Sheu, J.-H.; Chang, H.-W. Reactive oxygen species mediate soft corals-derived sinuleptolide-induced antiproliferation and DNA damage in oral cancer cells. OncoTargets Ther. 2017, 10, 3289–3297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Radak, Z.; Boldogh, I. 8-Oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine: Links to gene expression, aging, and defense against oxidative stress. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2010, 49, 587–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Ciccia, A.; Elledge, S.J. The DNA Damage Response: Making It Safe to Play with Knives. Mol. Cell 2010, 40, 179–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Kuo, L.J.; Yang, L.-X. Gamma-H2AX—A novel biomarker for DNA double-strand breaks. In Vivo 2008, 22, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Yazdi, P.T.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, S.; Patel, N.; Lee, E.Y.-H.; Qin, J. SMC1 is a downstream effector in the ATM/NBS1 branch of the human S-phase checkpoint. Genome Res. 2002, 16, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Na Gil, H.; Jung, E.; Koh, D.; Lim, Y.; Lee, Y.; Shin, S.Y. A synthetic chalcone derivative, 2-hydroxy-3′,5,5′-trimethoxychalcone (DK-139), triggers reactive oxygen species-induced apoptosis independently of p53 in A549 lung cancer cells. Chem. Interact. 2019, 298, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Halliwell, B. Free radicals and antioxidants—Quo vadis? Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2011, 32, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Henry-Mowatt, J.; Dive, C.; Martinou, J.-C.; James, D. Role of mitochondrial membrane permeabilization in apoptosis and cancer. Oncogene 2004, 23, 2850–2860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Riedl, S.J.; Salvesen, G.S. The apoptosome: Signalling platform of cell death. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Riedl, S.J.; Shi, Y. Molecular mechanisms of caspase regulation during apoptosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 5, 897–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yang, J. Prevention of Apoptosis by Bcl-2: Release of Cytochrome c from Mitochondria Blocked. Science 1997, 275, 1129–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Redza-Dutordoir, M.; Averill-Bates, D.A. Activation of apoptosis signalling pathways by reactive oxygen species. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Bioenerg. 2016, 1863, 2977–2992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ly, J.D.; Grubb, D.R.; Lawen, A. The mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) in apoptosis; an update. Apoptosis 2003, 8, 115–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Morrison, D.K. MAP Kinase Pathways. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012, 4, a011254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Dhanasekaran, D.N.; Reddy, E.P. JNK signaling in apoptosis. Oncogene 2008, 27, 6245–6251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Chauhan, D.; Hideshima, T.; Podar, K.; Mitsiades, C.; Munshi, N.C.; Kharbanda, S.; Anderson, K.C.; Li, G.; Mitsiades, N. JNK-dependent Release of Mitochondrial Protein, Smac, during Apoptosis in Multiple Myeloma (MM) Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 17593–17596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Porras, A.; Zuluaga, S.; Black, E.; Valladares, A.; Alvarez-Barrientos, A.; Ambrosino, C.; Benito, M.; Nebreda, A.R. p38α Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Sensitizes Cells to Apoptosis Induced by Different Stimuli. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 15, 922–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Cagnol, S.; Chambard, J.C. ERK and cell death: Mechanisms of ERK-induced cell death—Apoptosis, autophagy and senescence. FEBS J. 2009, 277, 2–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Son, Y.; Kim, S.; Chung, H.-T.; Pae, H.-O. Reactive Oxygen Species in the Activation of MAP Kinases. Methods Enzymol. 2013, 528, 27–48. [Google Scholar]
  79. Wang, L.-H.; Li, H.-H.; Li, M.; Wang, S.; Jiang, X.-R.; Li, Y.; Ping, G.-F.; Cao, Q.; Liu, X.; Fang, W.-H.; et al. SL4, a chalcone-based compound, induces apoptosis in human cancer cells by activation of the ROS/MAPK signalling pathway. Cell Prolif. 2015, 48, 718–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomolecules 10 00345 g001 550
Figure 1. HCT116 cell proliferation treated with chalcone 1C ((2 E)-3-(acridin-9-yl)-1-(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one) alone (A) or in combination (N-acetyl cysteine (NAC)/1C) (B) and after NAC dilutions (C). Data were obtained from three independent measurements. Significantly different a p < 0.05, b p < 0.01, c p < 0.001 vs. untreated cells (control); ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. 1C.
Figure 1. HCT116 cell proliferation treated with chalcone 1C ((2 E)-3-(acridin-9-yl)-1-(2,6-dimethoxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one) alone (A) or in combination (N-acetyl cysteine (NAC)/1C) (B) and after NAC dilutions (C). Data were obtained from three independent measurements. Significantly different a p < 0.05, b p < 0.01, c p < 0.001 vs. untreated cells (control); ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. 1C.
Biomolecules 10 00345 g001
Biomolecules 10 00345 g002 550
Figure 2. The influence of 1C and NAC/1C on free radical production in HCT116 cells. (A) Measurement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels after 6, 24, 48, and 72 h incubation (B) Relative levels of reactive nitrogen species (RNS) after 6, 24, 48, and 72 h incubation (C) Relative levels of superoxide after 3, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h incubation (D) Analysis of lipoperoxide production after 6, 24, 48, and 72 h incubation. Data were obtained from three independent measurements. Significantly different a p < 0.05, b p < 0.01, c p < 0.001 vs. untreated cells (control); * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. 1C.
Figure 2. The influence of 1C and NAC/1C on free radical production in HCT116 cells. (A) Measurement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels after 6, 24, 48, and 72 h incubation (B) Relative levels of reactive nitrogen species (RNS) after 6, 24, 48, and 72 h incubation (C) Relative levels of superoxide after 3, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h incubation (D) Analysis of lipoperoxide production after 6, 24, 48, and 72 h incubation. Data were obtained from three independent measurements. Significantly different a p < 0.05, b p < 0.01, c p < 0.001 vs. untreated cells (control); * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. 1C.
Biomolecules 10 00345 g002
Biomolecules 10 00345 g003 550
Figure 3. Oxidative DNA damage detection using 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoG) level measurement after 24, 48, and 72 h incubation of HCT116 cells with 1C and NAC/1C. Significantly different c p < 0.001 vs. untreated cells (control); ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. 1C.
Figure 3. Oxidative DNA damage detection using 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoG) level measurement after 24, 48, and 72 h incubation of HCT116 cells with 1C and NAC/1C. Significantly different c p < 0.001 vs. untreated cells (control); ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. 1C.
Biomolecules 10 00345 g003
Biomolecules 10 00345 g004 550
Figure 4. Antioxidant status of HCT116 cells after 1C, NAC, and NAC/1C treatment. The influence of 1C and combination of NAC/1C on glutathione content (A), glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity (B), glutathione reductase (GR) activity (C), and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activity (D). The experiments were performed in triplicate and measured parameters were calculated per milligram or kilogram of protein vs. untreated cells (control).
Figure 4. Antioxidant status of HCT116 cells after 1C, NAC, and NAC/1C treatment. The influence of 1C and combination of NAC/1C on glutathione content (A), glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity (B), glutathione reductase (GR) activity (C), and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activity (D). The experiments were performed in triplicate and measured parameters were calculated per milligram or kilogram of protein vs. untreated cells (control).
Biomolecules 10 00345 g004
Biomolecules 10 00345 g005 550
Figure 5. Representative histograms of cell cycle distribution in HCT116 cells treated with NAC, 1C, or NAC/1C after 24, 48, and 72 h.
Figure 5. Representative histograms of cell cycle distribution in HCT116 cells treated with NAC, 1C, or NAC/1C after 24, 48, and 72 h.
Biomolecules 10 00345 g005
Biomolecules 10 00345 g006 550
Figure 6. Representative dot-blot diagrams of annexin V/PI staining in HCT116 cells after treatment with NAC, 1C, and NAC/1C.
Figure 6. Representative dot-blot diagrams of annexin V/PI staining in HCT116 cells after treatment with NAC, 1C, and NAC/1C.
Biomolecules 10 00345 g006
Biomolecules 10 00345 g007 550
Figure 7. Mitochondrial apoptotic pathway alteration in 1C-treated and NAC/1C-co-treated HCT116 cells represented by cytochrome c release (A), expression of Smac/DIABLO (B), and caspase-3 (C) or caspase-7 activation and PARP cleavage (D). Significantly different a p < 0.05, b p < 0.01, c p < 0.001 vs. untreated cells (control); * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. 1C.
Figure 7. Mitochondrial apoptotic pathway alteration in 1C-treated and NAC/1C-co-treated HCT116 cells represented by cytochrome c release (A), expression of Smac/DIABLO (B), and caspase-3 (C) or caspase-7 activation and PARP cleavage (D). Significantly different a p < 0.05, b p < 0.01, c p < 0.001 vs. untreated cells (control); * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. 1C.
Biomolecules 10 00345 g007
Biomolecules 10 00345 g008 550
Figure 8. Mitochondrial membrane potential changes after 1C or NAC/1C treatment. Significantly different b p < 0.01, c p < 0.001 vs. untreated cells (control); ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. 1C.
Figure 8. Mitochondrial membrane potential changes after 1C or NAC/1C treatment. Significantly different b p < 0.01, c p < 0.001 vs. untreated cells (control); ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. 1C.
Biomolecules 10 00345 g008
Biomolecules 10 00345 g009 550
Figure 9. Relative levels of phosphorylated bcl-2 after 24, 48, and 72 h of 1C or NAC/1C treatment. Significantly different b p < 0.01 vs. untreated cells (control); *** p < 0.001 vs. 1C.
Figure 9. Relative levels of phosphorylated bcl-2 after 24, 48, and 72 h of 1C or NAC/1C treatment. Significantly different b p < 0.01 vs. untreated cells (control); *** p < 0.001 vs. 1C.
Biomolecules 10 00345 g009
Biomolecules 10 00345 g010 550
Figure 10. Analysis of DNA damage-related proteins. Phospho histone H2A.X (A,D), phospho-ataxia telangiectasia mutated kinase (ATM), (B) and phospho-structural maintenance of chromosomes 1 (SMC1) (C) levels after 24, 48, and 72 h of 1C or NAC/1C treatment. Significantly different a p < 0.05, b p < 0.01, c p < 0.001 vs. untreated cells (control); * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. 1C.
Figure 10. Analysis of DNA damage-related proteins. Phospho histone H2A.X (A,D), phospho-ataxia telangiectasia mutated kinase (ATM), (B) and phospho-structural maintenance of chromosomes 1 (SMC1) (C) levels after 24, 48, and 72 h of 1C or NAC/1C treatment. Significantly different a p < 0.05, b p < 0.01, c p < 0.001 vs. untreated cells (control); * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. 1C.
Biomolecules 10 00345 g010
Biomolecules 10 00345 g011 550
Figure 11. Phosphorylation status of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) proteins. Phosphorylation changes of p38 MAPK (A,D), JNK (B,D), and ERK1/2 (C,D) as the result of 1C or NAC/1C combination treatment. Significantly different a p < 0.05, b p < 0.01, c p < 0.001 vs. untreated cells (control); ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. 1C.
Figure 11. Phosphorylation status of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) proteins. Phosphorylation changes of p38 MAPK (A,D), JNK (B,D), and ERK1/2 (C,D) as the result of 1C or NAC/1C combination treatment. Significantly different a p < 0.05, b p < 0.01, c p < 0.001 vs. untreated cells (control); ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. 1C.
Biomolecules 10 00345 g011
Table
Table 1. Flow cytometry staining.
Table 1. Flow cytometry staining.
AnalysisStaining SolutionManufacturer
ROSDHR123 (Dihydrorhodamine 123), final concentration 200 nMSigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA
RNSDAF-FM (Diaminofluorescein-FM) diacetate, final concentration 2 mMSigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA
Lipid peroxidationBODIPY 581/591 C11, final concentration 1 mMSigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA
Superoxide anionMitoSox Red mitochondrial superoxide indicator, final concentration 5 µMSigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA
Externalization of phosphatidylserineAnnexin V-FITC, 1:100
Propidium iodide, final concentration 25 µg/mL 		BD Biosciences Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA
Caspase-3 activationCleaved caspase-3-PE, 1:200BD Biosciences Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA
Cytochrome c releaseCytochrome c antibody (6H2) FITC conjugate, 1:200Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA
Smac/DIABLO releaseSmac/DIABLO rabbit mAb, 1:200Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA
Goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) secondary antibody, Alexa Fluor 488, 1:500Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA
Mitochondrial membrane potentialTMRE (tetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester perchlorate), final concentration 0.1 µMSigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA
Protein analysisPhospho-Bcl-2 (Ser70) rabbit mAb Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate, 1:200
Phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2) (Thr202/Tyr204) (E10) mouse mAb, 1:2000
Phospho-SAPK/JNK (Thr183/Tyr185) (G9) mouse mAb (PE conjugate), 1:200
Phospho-p38 MAPK (Thr180/Tyr182) (3D7) rabbit mAb PE conjugate, 1:200		Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA
Goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) secondary antibody, Alexa Fluor 488, 1:500Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA
DNA damageAnti-pATM, PE conjugated antibody, 1:200
Anti-pHistone H2A.X, PerCP conjugated antibody, 1:200
Anti-pSMC1, Alexa Fluor 488 Antibody, 1:200		Millipore Corporation, Temecula, CA, USA
Anti-oxoguanine 8 antibodyAbcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) secondary antibody, Alexa Fluor 488Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA
Table
Table 2. List of Western blot antibodies.
Table 2. List of Western blot antibodies.
Primary AntibodiesMr (kDa)OriginManufacturer
β-actin45MouseCell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA
p38 MAPK43Rabbit
Phospho-p38MAPK43Rabbit
p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2)42 + 44Rabbit
Phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Erk 1/2)42 + 44Mouse
JNK148Mouse
Phospho-SAPK/JNK54Mouse
Cleaved caspase-718Rabbit
PARP116 + 89Rabbit
Phospho-histone H2A.X15Rabbit
Secondary AntibodiesMr (kDa)OriginManufacturer
Anti-rabbit IgG HRP-GoatCell Signalling Technology, Danvers, Massachusetts, USA
Anti-mouse IgG/HRP-GoatDako, Glostrup, Denmark
JNK1- c-Jun N-terminal kinase; SAPK- Stress-activated protein kinase; PARP- Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase.
Table
Table 3. Cell cycle analysis of HCT116 cells after 24, 48 and 72 h incubation with NAC, 1C, or NAC/1C.
Table 3. Cell cycle analysis of HCT116 cells after 24, 48 and 72 h incubation with NAC, 1C, or NAC/1C.
SubG0/G1G1SG2
C_24h1.77 ± 0.7444.65 ± 0.6528.45 ± 2.5525.25 ± 2.55
NAC2.71 ± 1.3641.30 ± 2.8025.55 ± 0.4530.60 ± 3.50
1C11.30 ± 2.31 b29.25 ± 3.15 b14.40 ± 2.10 b45.25 ± 1.45 c
NAC/1C4.25 ± 1.23 a**50.75 ± 3.45 ***15.85 ± 4.45 b29.35 ± 2.35 **
C_48h0.95 ± 0.6555.45 ± 6.4519.10 ± 6.5024.30 ± 0.90
NAC1.92 ± 0.3847.95 ± 0.1523.60 ± 2.0026.55 ± 2.55
1C11.85 ± 0.55 b31.80 ± 2.20 b17.75 ± 2.6538.35 ± 1.25 b
NAC/1C5.55 ± 0.95 a***52.95 ± 0.35 **16.85 ± 3.8524.50 ± 3.20 **
C_72h0.71 ± 0.0368.30 ± 6.0013.25 ± 1.9517.85 ± 4.45
NAC1.53 ± 0.7768.95 ± 6.3514.75 ± 2.5514.55 ± 3.15
1C15.63 ± 7.18 b26.25 ± 1.95 c18.80 ± 1.0039.00 ± 4.20 b
NAC/1C3.85 ± 1.24 a*67.75 ± 0.65 ***10.65 ± 1.65 **17.75 ± 0.25 **
The results are presented from three independent measurements as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Significantly different a p < 0.05, b p < 0.01, c p < 0.001 vs. untreated cells (control); * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. 1C.
Table
Table 4. Externalization of phosphatidylserine after treatment with NAC, 1C, and NAC/1C.
Table 4. Externalization of phosphatidylserine after treatment with NAC, 1C, and NAC/1C.
Live (Q1)Early Apoptotic (Q2)Late Apoptotic (Q3)Death (Q4)
C_24h97.80 ± 0.650.05 ± 0.040.18 ± 0.102.00 ± 0.49
NAC90.95 ± 1.671.61 ± 1.14 b6.20 ± 3.43 b1.23 ± 0.633 b
1C68.50 ± 0.98 c17.84 ± 2.25 c3.99 ± 0.99 c9.78 ± 0.34 c
NAC/1C86.65 ± 1.59 b***10.92 ± 2.35 c***0.71 ± 0.32 b**1.75 ± 0.45 ***
C_48h93.55 ± 0.861.37 ± 0.532.28 ± 0.622.75 ± 2.00
NAC91.50 ± 0.980.16 ± 0.138.10 ± 0.65 b0.27 ± 0.19 b
1C42.55 ± 5.76 c16.53 ± 2.96 c17.23 ± 5.69 c23.70 ± 3.02 c
NAC/1C62.15 ± 1.84 b**10.49 ± 0.35 c*15.61 ± 3.66 c11.75 ± 1.43 b**
C_72h94.30 ± 0.410.78 ± 0.211.38 ± 0.513.56 ± 0.29
NAC94.95 ± 0.200.06 ± 0.05 c4.85 ± 0.050.17 ± 0.09
1C31.85 ± 5.59 c11.29 ± 0.58 c25.71 ± 4.07 c31.20 ± 0.89 c
NAC/1C61.10 ± 1.23 b**8.83 ± 1.48 c*11.83 ± 0.96 b*18.24 ± 0.70 b***
The results are presented from three independent measurements as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Significantly different b p < 0.01, c p < 0.001 vs. untreated cells (control); * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. 1C.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Takac, P.; Kello, M.; Vilkova, M.; Vaskova, J.; Michalkova, R.; Mojzisova, G.; Mojzis, J. Antiproliferative Effect of Acridine Chalcone Is Mediated by Induction of Oxidative Stress. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10020345

AMA Style

Takac P, Kello M, Vilkova M, Vaskova J, Michalkova R, Mojzisova G, Mojzis J. Antiproliferative Effect of Acridine Chalcone Is Mediated by Induction of Oxidative Stress. Biomolecules. 2020; 10(2):345. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10020345

Chicago/Turabian Style

Takac, Peter, Martin Kello, Maria Vilkova, Janka Vaskova, Radka Michalkova, Gabriela Mojzisova, and Jan Mojzis. 2020. "Antiproliferative Effect of Acridine Chalcone Is Mediated by Induction of Oxidative Stress" Biomolecules 10, no. 2: 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom10020345

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop