Art and Design, Faculty of Technology, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 4 St., Olavs Plass, NO-0130 Oslo, Norway
Academic Editors: Elias C. Vagenas and Lorenzo Iorio
Received: 25 July 2016 / Revised: 24 August 2016 / Accepted: 27 August 2016 / Published: 6 September 2016
I show here that there are some interesting differences between the predictions of warm and cold inflation models focusing in particular upon the scalar spectral index
and the tensor-to-scalar ratio r
. The first thing to be noted is that the warm inflation models in general predict a vanishingly small value of r
. Cold inflationary models with the potential
and a number of e-folds
is the scalar spectral index, while the corresponding warm inflation models with constant value of the dissipation parameter
. For example, for
. The warm polynomial model with
seems to be in conflict with the Planck data. However, the warm natural inflation model can be adjusted to be in agreement with the Planck data. It has, however, more adjustable parameters in the expressions for the spectral parameters than the corresponding cold inflation model, and is hence a weaker model with less predictive force. However, it should be noted that the warm inflation models take into account physical processes such as dissipation of inflaton energy to radiation energy, which is neglected in the cold inflationary models.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
Share & Cite This Article
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
[Return to top]
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.