Next Article in Journal
Similarity Downselection: Finding the n Most Dissimilar Molecular Conformers for Reference-Free Metabolomics
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Protective Amino Acid Metabolism Events in Nursery Pigs Fed Thermally Oxidized Corn Oil
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metabolites
Volume 13
Issue 1
10.3390/metabo13010104
metabolites-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Mixture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Clostridium butyricum Could Promote Rumen Fermentation and Improve the Growth Performance of Goats in Hot Summer

by
Liyuan Cai
1,
Min Li
2,
Shuyi Zhou
3 and
Qingbiao Xu
1,*
1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
2
Institute of Dairy Science, College of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
3
Hainan Provincial Animal Husbandry Technology Promotion Station, Haikou 570100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metabolites 2023, 13(1), 104; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13010104
Submission received: 25 November 2022 / Revised: 23 December 2022 / Accepted: 27 December 2022 / Published: 9 January 2023
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study aimed to investigate the effects of multiple mixing ratio pairs of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) and Clostridium butyricum (CB) on rumen fermentation and growth performance of goats in hot summer. Thirty goats were divided into five groups: 0.00% probiotics (control), 0.30% SC and 0.05% CB (P1), 0.30% SC and 0.10% CB (P2), 0.60% SC and 0.05% CB (P3), and 0.60% SC and 0.10% CB (P4) of the dry matter (DM) weight of the basal diet and were assigned to a 5 × 5 Latin square experimental design. The results showed the pH values, the activities of ruminal cellulolytic enzymes, and the concentrations of ammonia nitrogen, acetic acid, propionic acid, total volatile fatty acids, vitamins B1 and B2, and niacin were significantly increased (p < 0.05) by probiotics. Moreover, the DM intake, average daily gain, the digestibilities of DM, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber were significantly increased (p < 0.05) in probiotic-supplemented groups. Additionally, among all probiotic supplementation groups, the P3 group had the most beneficial effect on rumen fermentation parameters and the growth performance of goats. These results suggested that the mixture of 0.60% Saccharomyces cerevisiae and 0.05% Clostridium butyricum of the DM concentration was beneficial to improve rumen fermentation and promote the growth of goats in hot summer.

1. Introduction

Goats are commonly kept in natural ventilation houses in the Jianghuai region of China [1]. Goats kept in this way are vulnerable to the adverse effects of summer temperatures, which mainly lead to the decrease in rumen fermentation function and ultimately lead to decreased growth performance [2].
Probiotics have been widely applied in livestock production because of their non-toxic side effects, no drug resistance, and no residue characteristics. Saccharomyces cerevisiae (a type of yeast) could improve the balance of beneficial gut microbiota and eliminate harmful pathogens, feed digestion, production performance, and health status [3,4]. Yeast is a critical probiotic group used in ruminant production [5]. It has outstanding advantages in stabilizing the rumen environment by providing nutrients to promote the growth of lactic acid bacteria for the stability of the rumen pH, increasing the population of cellulolytic bacteria [5,6]. Clostridium butyricum is a promising probiotic candidate, which could provide nutrients and antioxidants to balance the gut microbiota and improve immunity and growth performance in ruminants [7]. Compared to its wide application in monogastric animals, Clostridium butyricum is less used in ruminants [8,9]. It has been suggested that Clostridium butyricum could promote rumen fermentation and growth performance of calves and bred cattle [10].
Our previous study reported that supplementation with the mixture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Clostridium butyricum had a more beneficial effect on promoting rumen fermentation and improving the growth performance of goats in hot summer than the use of the single Saccharomyces cerevisiae or Clostridium butyricum [11]. However, only one level of combination of these two probiotics was used in our previous study. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of multiple mixing ratio pairs of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Clostridium butyricum on rumen fermentation and growth performance of goats in hot summer. This study could provide a scientific and novel insight in using the mixture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Clostridium butyricum in hot summer to promote rumen fermentation and improve the growth performance of goats.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Goats and Management

This study was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Huazhong Agricultural University (Approval code: HZAUGO-2015-008) and was carried out from May to October 2021. The study was conducted on 30 (5.0 ± 1.0 months) Macheng Black × Boer crossed goats, half male and half female, weighing 19 to 21 kg. These goats were kept in a naturally ventilated house with individual feeding pen (1.20 × 1.50 m) on an intensive farm in Hefei, China. Goats were fed on a basal diet in DM of 1.30 kg/day. These goats were fed the diet twice a day at 6:00–8:00 and 17:00–19:00). These goats had free access to water and were gavaged with water to ensure daily water intake attained 3.50 L per goat. The composition and nutritional levels of the basal diet are given in Table 1.

2.2. Probiotics Feeding Experiments

Thirty goats were divided into five groups and assigned to a 5 × 5 Latin square experimental design. Probiotics were supplemented with the diet, and these groups were as follows: 0.00% probiotics (control), 0.30% Saccharomyces cerevisiae and 0.05% Clostridium butyricum (P1), 0.30% Saccharomyces cerevisiae and 0.10% Clostridium butyricum (P2), 0.60% Saccharomyces cerevisiae and 0.05% Clostridium butyricum (P3), and 0.60% Saccharomyces cerevisiae and 0.10% Clostridium butyricum (P4) of the DM weight of the basal diet. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae for ruminants was provided by Angel Yeast Co., Ltd. (Yichang, China) and had a content of live cells at 2.0 × 1010 CFU/g. The Clostridium butyricum was provided by Huijia Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Huzhou, China) and had a content of live cells at 1.0 × 108 CFU/g. Five experimental cycles were included in this study, each cycle lasting fourteen days. In each cycle, five grams of chromium oxide was added to the diet as an external marker on days 11 to 13 to determine nutrient digestibility. To eliminate the influence of probiotics in last cycle, all the goats were fed a basal diet for 7 days between cycles.

2.3. Sample Collection and Measurement

Blood and rumen contents samples were collected on the last day (day 14) of each experimental cycle. The blood samples were collected in the morning after 24 h of fasting. Blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min to obtain serum. Rumen contents were collected in the morning after 4 h of feeding and were collected from all goats using a rubber stomach tube with a Jin Teng GM-0.33A vacuum pump (Tianjin, China). The rumen contents were filtered through four layers of gauze to obtain rumen fluid. Fecal samples were collected before the morning feedings on days 12 to 14 of each experimental cycle, and these samples from the same group were pooled. Samples were stored at −20 °C for further analysis.
The rectal temperature, skin temperature, pulse, and respiratory rate were measured. In brief, rectal temperature and skin temperature were measured using a clinical thermometer (Kefu, Hunan, China) and an infrared thermometer (Omega, New York, NY, USA). Respiratory rate was measured by a stethoscope (Kefu, Hunan, China) for monitoring inhalations and exhalations around the thoracic area. Pulse was measured by a stethoscope placed ventrally. These measurements were taken at 8:00, 12:00, and 17:00 daily throughout each day of the fourteen-day experimental cycle. According to the report by Xia et al. [12], the activities or concentrations of serum superoxide dismutase (SOD), Glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), vitamin E, vitamin C, and malondialdehyde (MDA) were determined by commercial kits provided by obtained from the Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, China). The activities of alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), creatine kinase (CK), the concentrations of urea nitrogen (BUN), glucose, triglyceride (TG), total protein (TP), cholesterol (CHOL), potassium ion (K+), sodium ion (Na+), and chloride ion (Cl−) in serum were determined by combining DiaSys Diagnostic System (Frankfurt, Germany) and an automatic biochemical analyzer (Hitachi 7100, Tokyo, Japan) following the instructions. The detection method of serum parameters of goats above is shown in Table 2.
Rumen pH values were determined immediately when rumen contents were collected using a digital pH meter (Orion Technology Co., Ltd., Massachusetts, USA). The concentrations of ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) and VFAs were determined as described by Maitisaiyidi et al. [13] and Yang et al. [14], respectively. The acetic acid to propionic acid ratio (A/P ratio) was calculated by the concentration of acetic divided by propionic acid concentration. According to Ciulu et al. [15], China National Standard GB/T 17819-1999, and GB/T 5009 197-2003, the concentrations of ruminal vitamins B1, B2, B6, and B12, and niacin were measured using a 2100-liquid chromatograph (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Separation was performed on an Agilent Eclipse XDB-C18 (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) column (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Each sample was prepared and injected in triplicate. The injection volume was 20 μL. The activities of avicelase, CMCaes, cellobiase, and xylanase were measured as described before [16].
Daily dry matter intake (DMI) and average daily gain (ADG) were measured as described by Cai et al. [11]. The contents of the DM, NDF, and ADF were measured in the feedstuff and feces as described by #930.15 in the AOAC and Goering and Van Soest [17,18], respectively. The digestibilities of DM, NDF, and ADF were calculated as follows: (nutrients content feedstuff–nutrients content in feces)/nutrients content in feedstuff × 100.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using R studio (v4.0.5) (GitHub Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA). The data of the rumen fermentation and growth performance parameters in the control group and each probiotic-supplemented group were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post hoc Dunn test for multiple pairwise comparisons. p values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Probiotics Did Not Affect the Physiological Parameters of Goats in Hot Summer

The skin temperature, rectal temperature, pulse, and respiratory rate were not significantly different among the control and probiotics supplementation groups. The physiological parameters fed probiotics in hot summer are given in Table 3.

3.2. Probiotics Affected Blood Biochemistry

Supplementation with the mixture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Clostridium butyricum, the activities of GSH-Px and SOD, and the concentrations of TP were increased significantly (p < 0.05) compared to the control group. However, the concentrations of MDA were decreased significantly (p < 0.05) in each probiotic-supplemented group compared to the control group. However, the activity and the concentrations of these three parameters above were significantly increased compared to the control group (p < 0.05). The ascensional range of these parameters in P3 was more significant than that in other probiotic groups. Blood biochemical parameters of goats fed probiotics supplementation in hot summer are shown in Table 4.

3.3. Probiotics Improve Rumen Fermentation

The pH values, the concentrations of NH3-N, total volatile fatty acids (TVFA), acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, and A/P ratio, and the activities of avicelase, CMCaes, cellobiase, and xylanase in the rumen of goats were significantly increased in each probiotics-supplemented group compared with that of the control group (p < 0.05). Moreover, the ascensional range of these parameters in the P3 group was greater than that in other probiotic groups. The parameters of rumen fermentation of goats fed probiotics in hot summer are shown in Table 5.

3.4. Probiotics Promoted Ruminal B Vitamins Production in Hot Summer

The concentrations of ruminal vitamins B1 and B2, and niacin were significantly increased in each probiotic-supplemented group compared with that of the control group (p < 0.05). These three B vitamins have higher concentrations (p < 0.05) in the P3 group than that in other probiotic groups. The concentrations of ruminal B vitamins of goats fed probiotics in hot summer are shown in Table 6.

3.5. Probiotics Improved Growth Performance of Goats in Hot Summer

The DMI, ADG, and digestibilities of DM, NDF, and ADF of goats were significantly increased in each probiotic-supplemented group compared with that of the control group (p < 0.05). Moreover, the ascensional range of these parameters in the P3 group was more significant than in other probiotic groups. The parameters of the growth performance of goats fed probiotics supplementation in hot summer are shown in Table 7.

4. Discussion

Since heat arises from rumen fermentation, ruminants exhibit less tolerance to hot environments [19]. Rumen fermentation and the growth performance of goats could be adversely affected in hot summer (Figure 1) [2,20]. Moreover, heat stress can cause the disorder of redox balance of the body, the occurrence of oxidative stress, and damage to cells and tissues, thus affecting the growth and development of the body and health status [21]. Dietary supplementation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Clostridium butyricum was one of the most effective ways to alleviate the adverse effects of heat stress in goat production [11]. In this study, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Clostridium butyricum were paired with different concentration gradients to study the promoting effect of their mixture on rumen fermentation and growth performance of goats in hot summer. This study is a continuation of our previous study showing that the two probiotics worked better in combination than individual. Therefore, it is necessary to screen out the optimal mixed dose through this study.
Rumen pH value is an important parameter closely related to the rumen environment, which can reflect the fermentation of diets in the rumen [22]. In this study, supplementation with the mixture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Clostridium butyricum could enhance the rumen pH of goats in hot summer. This result was consistent with previous studies on cows and goats with live yeast or Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Clostridium butyricum supplementation [11,23,24,25]. These results suggested that the mixture of these two probiotics could effectively promote the pH in hot summer. This may be because probiotics can promote the abundance of rumen bacteria and protozoa, which could consume lactic acid in the rumen [26,27]. In this study, supplementation with the mixture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Clostridium butyricum could increase the NH3-N concentration in the rumen, which was similar to previous studies [11]. The effects of these two probiotics on increased ruminal NH3-N could attribute to the rumen microbiota promoted by probiotics supplementation to degrade and hydrolyze protein [28]. However, previous studies also showed that yeast had no effect or could decrease the NH3-N concentration in the rumen [24,28,29,30]. The variety in the results can be attributed to the management system, species, and physiological state of the ruminants, probiotic species, supplemented levels of probiotics, the composition of the diets, and environmental conditions in different studies [11]. In this study, supplementation with the mixture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Clostridium butyricum improved the concentrations of VFAs in the rumen of goats in hot summer, similar to previous reports with consistent results [11,20]. However, previous studies also reported that these two probiotics do not affect ruminal VFAs concentrations [27,31,32]. Ruminal VFAs originate from the fermentation of feed fiber, and probiotics are beneficial for the growth and reproduction of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria, which enhances VFA production in the rumen [29,33]. Classical ruminant nutrition theory holds that the rumen microbiota could produce sufficient amounts of vitamin B to meet the needs of their ruminant host [34]. The function of B vitamins is to act as precursors for cofactors or enzyme cofactors [35]. Studies in recent years have shown that in certain physiological or rearing conditions, the production of ruminal B vitamins could not meet the requirements of ruminants [36]. Despite the deficiency of B vitamins, many studies have obtained expected results by supplementation with exogenous B vitamins. Previous studies reported that with dietary supplementation with vitamin B1 to dairy cows with ruminal acidosis, the rumen pH was increased, and the acidosis symptoms were eased [37,38]. Dietary supplements with niacin significantly decreased somatic cell numbers in heat-stressed cows [39]. Few studies have been conducted to supply B vitamins by feeding probiotics to ruminants. In this study, dietary supplementation with the mixture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Clostridium butyricum could significantly improve the yield of vitamin B1 and B2 and niacin in the rumen of goats in hot summer. The reasons for this effect of the mixture of these two probiotics can be summarized as follows: (1) yeast cells contain carbohydrates, such as glucose, furan mannose, and chitin, which can be used as fermentation substrates for ruminal microorganisms [40,41]; (2) yeast contains B vitamins; (3) yeast also directly provides the B vitamins for rumen microbiota and ruminants [42]; (4) Clostridium butyricum could provide product B vitamins as its metabolite [43,44]. In this study, the P3 group showed the most significant improvement in rumen fermentation. Therefore, the combination levels of 0.60% Saccharomyces cerevisiae and 0.05% Clostridium butyricum of dry matter are optimal supplemental levels to improve rumen fermentation in hot summer among all the probiotics groups.
In this study, dietary supplementation with the mixture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Clostridium butyricum promoted the digestibilities of DM, NDF, and ADF of goats in hot summer. Our previous studies also reported a similar result with supplementation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Clostridium butyricum separately of heat-stressed goats [11,20]. These promoted effects may be attributed to these probiotics that could consume O2 in the rumen and provide nutrients for ruminal cellulolytic bacteria [29,31]. Moreover, in this study, supplementation with the mixture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Clostridium butyricum enhanced the activities of avicelase, CMCase, cellobiase, and xylanase and could also be the plausible explanation for the increased digestibilities of DM, NDF, and ADF [11]. In this study, the combination levels of 0.60% Saccharomyces cerevisiae and 0.05% Clostridium butyricum of DM are the optimal supplemental levels to promote rumen fermentation and improve the growth performance of goats in hot summer.

5. Conclusions

In hot summer, dietary supplementation with this mixture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Clostridium butyricum promoted the activities of serum GSH-Px and SOD, and the TP concentration while reducing serum MDA concentration. Moreover, supplementation with this mixture could effectively promote rumen fermentation by increasing pH, the concentrations of NH3-N, VFAs, vitamin B, and cellulolytic enzyme activities in the rumen of goats. Additionally, this mixture could effectively improve growth performance by improving the digestibilities of DM, NDF, and ADF in goats. To promote rumen fermentation and enhance the growth performance of goats in hot summer, the combination levels of 0.60% Saccharomyces cerevisiae and 0.05% Clostridium butyricum of the DM concentration in the basal diet are optimal supplemental levels.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.C. and Q.X.; formal analysis and methodology, M.L. and S.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, L.C.; writing—review and editing, L.C. and Q.X.; supervision, Q.X.; project administration, Q.X.; funding acquisition, Q.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31601962) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2662019QD021).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Huazhong Agricultural University.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sun, D.; Deng, B.; Wei, C.X.; Jia, L. Effects of urbanization process on the climate in Hefei city. J. Anhui Agri. Sci. 2008, 26, 11484–11487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Marai, I.F.M.; EI-Darawany, A.A.; Fadie, A.; Abdel-Hafez, M.A.M. Physiological traits as affected by heat stress in sheep—A review. Small Rumin. Res. 2007, 71, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Desnoyers, M.S.; Giger-Reverdin, G.; Bertin, G.; Duvaux-Pouter, D.; Sauvant, D. Meta-analysis of the influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae supplementation on ruminal parameters and milk production of ruminant. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92, 1620–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Mahesh, M.S.; Mohanta, R.K.; Patra, A.K. Probiotics in Livestock and Poultry Nutrition and Health. In Advances in Probiotics for Sustainable Food and Medicine; Gunjan, G., Kumar, A., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 149–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Arowolo, M.A.; He, J.H. Use of probiotics and botanical extracts to improve ruminant production in the tropics: A review. Anim. Nutr. 2018, 3, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khan, R.U.; Shabana, N.; Kuldeep, D.; Karthik, K.; Ruchi, T.; Mutassim, M.A.; Alhidary, I.A.; Zahoor, A. Direct-fed beneficial applications, modes of action and prospects as a safe tool for enhancing production and safeguarding health. Int. J. Pharm. 2016, 12, 220–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Wang, J.Y.; Su, X.D.; Pan, K.C. Biological characteristics of Clostridium butyricum and its application in animal production. In Proceedings of the 13th National Symposium on Animal Microecology, Beijing, China, 16–20 July 2018. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yang, C.M.; Cao, G.T.; Ferket, P.R.; Liu, T.T.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, L.; Xiao, Y.P.; Chen, A.G. Effects of probiotic, Clostridium butyricum, on growth performance, immune function, and cecal microflora in broiler chickens. Poul. Sci. 2012, 91, 2121–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liao, X.D.; Wu, R.J.; Ma, L.M.; Zhao, L.M.; Zheng, Z.J.; Zhang, R.J. Effects of Clostridium butyricum on antioxidant properties, meat quality and fatty acid composition of broiler birds. Lipids Health Dis. 2015, 14, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Li, W.Q. Effects of Clostridium butyricum on Growth Performance, Blood Index and Rumen Fermentation in Calves and Bred Cattle. Master’s Thesis, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cai, L.Y.; Yu, J.K.; Hartanto, R.; Qi, D.S. Dietary supplementation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Clostridium butyricum and their combination ameliorate rumen fermentation and growth performance of heat-stressed goats. Animals 2021, 11, 2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xia, Z.F.; Cai, L.Y.; He, Y.Y.; Yu, J.H. Xylitol poisoning of dogs is associated with increased glycogenolysis, coagulopathy, and oxidative stress. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2013, 2, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Maitisaiyidi, T.; Yibureyimu, A.; Yang, K. Determination of ammonia-nitrogen in ruminal fluid treated with methanol by alkaline hypochlorite-phenol spectrophotometry. Xinjiang Agr. Sci. 2012, 3, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, W.Z.; Beauchemin, K.A.; Rode, L.M. Effects of grain processing, forage to concentrate ratio, and feed particle size on rumen pH and digestion by dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2001, 2, 203–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ciulu, M.; Solinas, S.; Floris, I.; Panzanelli, P.; Pilo, M.; Piu, P.C.; Spano, N.; Sanna, G. RP-HPLC determination of water-soluble vitamins in honey. Talanta 2011, 83, 924–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, S.P.; Wang, W.J. Research Progress on the factors influencing the amount of methane emission of ruminants. Chin. Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2013, 2, 225–227. [Google Scholar]
  17. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 18th ed.; AOAC Int.: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  18. Goering, H.K.; Van Soest, P.J. Forage Fiber Analysis (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures and Some Applications); USDA Agricultural Handbook: Washington, DC, USA, 1970; p. 379. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tajima, K.; Nonaka, I.; Higuchi, K.; Takusari, N.; Kurihara, M.; Takenaka, A.; Mitsumori, M.; Kajikawa, H.; Aminov, R.I. Influence of high temperature and humidity on rumen bacterial diversity in Holstein heifers. Anaerobe 2007, 2, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhao, S.G.; Li, M.; Zheng, N.; Wang, J.Q. Effect of Heat Stress on Bacterial Composition and Metabolism in the Rumen of Lactating Dairy Cows. Animals 2019, 9, 925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Xu, X.; Wei, Y.; Hua, H.W.; Jing, X.Q.; Zhu, H.L.; Xiao, K.; Zhao, J.C.; Liu, Y.L. polyphenols sourced from ilex latifolia thunb. relieve intestinal injury via modulating ferroptosis in weanling piglets under oxidative stress. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, C.J.; Sun, M.J.; Sun, J.Y.; Lv, W.L.; Liu, W.; Shan, A.S. Dietary compound probiotics on rumen fermentation and cellulase activity in dairy cows. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2011, 5, 821–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bach, A.; Iglesias, C.; Devant, M. Daily ruminal pH pattern of loose-housed dairy cattle as affected by feeding pattern and live yeast supplementation. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 2007, 1, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Thrune, M.; Bach, A.; Ruiz-Moreno, M.; Stern, M.D.; Linn, J.G. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on ruminal pH and microbial fermentation in dairy cows: Yeast supplementation on rumen fermentation. Livest. Sci. 2009, 124, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Moallem, U.; Lehrer, H.; Livshitz, L.M.; Zachut, M.; Yakoby, S. The effects of live yeast supplementation to dairy cows during the hot season on production, feed efficiency, and digestibility. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Galip, N. Effect of supplemental yeast culture and sodium bicarbonate on ruminal fermentation and blood variables in rams. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2006, 90, 446–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Qadis, A.Q.; Goya, S.; Ikuta, K.; Yatsu, M.; Kimura, A.; Nakanishi, S.; Sato, S. Effects of a bacteria-based probiotic on ruminal ph, volatile fatty acids and bacterial flora of holstein calves. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2004, 76, 877–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Kiran, R.R.; Kumar, D.S. Influence of yeast culture supplementation on rumen fermentation of bulls fed complete rations. IJASVM 2013, 1, 8–15. [Google Scholar]
  29. Chaucheyras-Durand, F.; Walker, N.D.; Bach, A. Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem: Past, present and future. Anim. Feed. Sci. Tech. 2008, 1, 5–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Oeztuerk, H. Effects of live and autoclaved yeast cultures on ruminal fermentation in vitro. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2009, 18, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Uyeno, Y.; Akiyama, K.; Hasunuma, T.; Yamamoto, H.; Yokokawa, H.; Kawashima, K.M.; Itoh, M.; Kushibiki, S.; Hirako, M. Effects of supplementing an active dry yeast product on rumen microbial community composition and on subsequent rumen fermentation of lactating cows in the mid-to-late lactation period. Anim. Sci. J. 2017, 88, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lila, Z.A.; Mohammed, N.; Yasui, T.; Kurokawa, Y.; Kanda, S.; Itabashi, H. Effects of a twin strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae live cells on mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation in vitro. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 82, 1847–1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chaucheyras-Durand, F.; Fonty, G. Influence of a probiotic yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077) on microbial colonization and fermentations in the rumen of newborn lambs. Microbial. Eco. Heal. Dise. 2002, 1, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhao, G.Y. Ruminant Nutrition; China Agricultural university press: Beijing, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  35. Russell, J.B.; Rychlik, J.L. Factors that alter rumen microbial ecology. Science 2001, 292, 1119–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, N.; Li, M.Y.; Peng, Q.H. Research Progress of Vitamin B in Ruminant Nutrition. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 9, 4909–4919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pan, X.H.; Xue, F.G.; Nan, X.M.; Tang, Z.W.; Wang, K.; Yves, B.; Jiang, L.; Xiong, B. Illumina sequencing approach to characterize thiamine metabolism related bacteria and the impacts of thiamine supplementation on ruminal microbiota in dairy cows fed high-grain diets. Front. Microbio. 2017, 8, 18128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Pan, X.H.; Yang, L.; Beckers, Y.; Xue, F.G.; Tang, Z.W.; Jiang, L.S.; Xiong, B. Thiamine supplementation facilitates thiamine transporter expression in the rumen epithelium and attenuates high-grain-induced inflammation in low-yielding dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 5329–5342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Wrinkle, S.R.; Robinson, P.H.; Garrett, J.E. Niacin delivery to the intestinal absorptive site impacts heat stress and productivity responses of high producing dairy cows during hot conditions. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012, 175, 33–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Klis, F.M. Review: Cell wall assembly in yeast. Yeast 1994, 7, 851–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Moukadiri, I.; Armero, J.; Abad, A.; Sentandreu, R.; Zueco, R. Dentification of a mannoprotein present in the inner layer of the cell wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 7, 2154–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Feng, J.S.; Wang, Q.S.; Liao, B.L.; Yan, X.H. Application of yeast feed in animal husbandry. Feed. Ind. 2008, 4, 4–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yi, Z.H. Advances in research and application of probiotic Clostridium butyrate. Feed Res. 2012, 2, 4–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, S.T.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, S.L.; Wang, H.K. Progress on the studies and application of Clostridium butyricum. Biotechnol. Bull. 2013, 9, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Metabolites 13 00104 g001 550
Figure 1. The adverse effects of hot summer on rumen fermentation and growth performance of goats. The blue arrow indicated a decrease.
Figure 1. The adverse effects of hot summer on rumen fermentation and growth performance of goats. The blue arrow indicated a decrease.
Metabolites 13 00104 g001
Table
Table 1. Composition and nutritional levels (g/kg) of the basal diet.
Table 1. Composition and nutritional levels (g/kg) of the basal diet.
IngredientContentNutrition LevelAmount
Alfalfa564Dry matter955
Ground corn261Organic matter852
Soybean meal80Crude protein177
Wheat barn78Neutral detergent fiber436
Ca2HPO47Acid detergent fiber262
Premix *10Ca5.9
P3.2
* Premix contained per kg: 20.70 g Mg, 0.50 g Fe, 1 g Mn, 2 g Zn, 43 mg Se, 47 mg I, 54 mg, Co, 90,000 IU vitamin A, 17,000 IU vitamin D, and 1750 IU vitamin E.
Table
Table 2. The detection methods of serum parameters of goats.
Table 2. The detection methods of serum parameters of goats.
Biochemical IndexMethods
SOD, GSH-Px, vitamin C and E, and MDASpectrophotometry
ALT, ASTUltraviolet continuous monitoring
BUNGlutamate dehydrogenase
CKIFCC continuous monitoring
GlucoseGlucose oxidase
TPBiuret method
TG, CHOLEnzyme reagent
K+, Na+, Cl−Mercury thiocyanate endpoint method
Table
Table 3. Physiological parameters of goats fed probiotics in hot summer.
Table 3. Physiological parameters of goats fed probiotics in hot summer.
Physiological ParametersControlP1P2P3P4SEM
Skin temperature (°C)36.7036.4236.3336.5136.620.47
Rectal temperature (°C)39.4139.5239.4339.3239.460.33
Pulse (beats/min)84.7384.7583.8785.5784.232.43
Respiratory rate (breaths/min)34.7533.2335.2433.8933.881.11
0.00% probiotics (control), 0.30% SC and 0.05% CB (P1), 0.30% SC and 0.10% CB (P2), 0.60% SC and 0.05% CB (P3), and 0.60% SC and 0.10% CB (P4) of the DM weight of the basal diet.
Table
Table 4. Blood biochemical parameters of goats fed probiotics in hot summer.
Table 4. Blood biochemical parameters of goats fed probiotics in hot summer.
ParametersControlP1P2P3P4SEM
ALT (IU L−1)16.2616.1116.1716.1916.22 0.33
AST (IU L−1)81.3775.7171.6574.7372.173.21
CK (IU L−1)204.4184.5187.2186.6 185.517.44
Glucose (mmol L−1)3.463.273.24 3.42 3.370.45
TP (g L−1)58.17 a71.79 b70.83 b76.14 b70.78 b10.33
TG (mmol L−1)0.380.410.40 0.43 0.390.06
BUN (mmol L−1)8.878.748.34 7.878.460.55
CHOL (mmol L−1)1.771.711.891.911.800.31
K+ (mmol L−1)4.434.524.364.67 4.560.23
Na+ (mmol L−1)142.1144.4144.8 146.8 144.617.34
Cl− (mmol L−1)102.5102.7102.7103.4102.07.21
SOD (IU mL−1)170.8 a267.1 b264.7 b290.4 b276.8 b21.33
GSH-Px (µmol L−1)249.7 a448.3 b469.8 b511.3 b469.3 b27.11
Vitamin C (µg mL−1)20.738.8 38.9735.9037.842.14
Vitamin E (µg mL−1)16.7322.3423.0823.8320.981.77
MDA (nmol mL−1)8.41 a5.71 b5.82 b5.24 b5.21 b0.72
0.00% probiotics (control), 0.30% SC and 0.05% CB (P1), 0.30% SC and 0.10% CB (P2), 0.60% SC and 0.05% CB (P3), and 0.60% SC and 0.10% CB (P4) of the DM weight of the basal diet. Different letter superscripts indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 5. The parameters of rumen fermentation of goats fed probiotics in hot summer.
Table 5. The parameters of rumen fermentation of goats fed probiotics in hot summer.
Parameters ControlP1P2P3P4SEM
pH6.60 a6.81 b6.85 b6.88 b6.80 b0.05
NH3-N (mg 100 mL−1)5.49 a8.34 b8.21 b9.43 b8.02 b0.41
VFAs (mmol L−1)
TVFA30.16 a50.56 b52.54 b57.05 b50.50 b3.22
Acetic acid12.92 a25.14 b27.02 b28.82 b24.12 b1.54
Propionic acid10.38 a15.41 b15.65 b17.02 b16.33 b1.05
Butyric acid7.23 a10.11 b9.87 b11.21 b10.05 b0.23
A/P ratio1.29 a1.64 b1.73 b1.69 b1.48 b0.04
Avicelase1.31 a2.54 b2.44 b2.92 b2.34 b0.47
CMCaes1.36 a2.69 b2.47 b3.21 b2.39 b0.12
Cellobiase2.44 a4.77 b4.83 b5.24 b4.37 b0.43
Xylanase4.54 a6.51 b6.42 b7.41 b6.21 b0.51
0.00% probiotics (control), 0.30% SC and 0.05% CB (P1), 0.30% SC and 0.10% CB (P2), 0.60% SC and 0.05% CB (P3), and 0.60% SC and 0.10% CB (P4) of the DM weight of the basal diet. Different letter superscripts indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 6. The concentrations of ruminal B vitamins of goats fed probiotics supplementation in hot summer.
Table 6. The concentrations of ruminal B vitamins of goats fed probiotics supplementation in hot summer.
Vitamins ControlP1P2P3P4SEM
(μg/mL)
B1		0.14 a0.28 b0.24 b0.38 c0.24 b0.04
B20.19 a0.39 b0.69 b0.92 c0.52 b0.10
B61.521.721.501.851.230.13
B122.792.662.572.772.740.34
Niacin8.12 a35.00 b33.51 b45.22 c39.43 b3.16
0.00% probiotics (control), 0.30% SC and 0.05% CB (P1), 0.30% SC and 0.10% CB (P2), 0.60% SC and 0.05% CB (P3), and 0.60% SC and 0.10% CB (P4) of the DM weight of the basal diet. Different letter superscripts indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 7. The parameters of growth performance of goats fed probiotics in hot summer.
Table 7. The parameters of growth performance of goats fed probiotics in hot summer.
ParametersControlP1P2P3P4SEM
DMI (kg)0.80 a1.16 b1.20 b1.25 b1.21 b0.06
ADG (kg)0.08 a0.11 b0.13 b0.18 b0.14 b0.04
Digestibility
DM (%)36.67 a52.34 b50.21 b56.32 b52.12 b2.54
NDF (%)30.17 a44.35 b45.43 b47.87 b43.21 b3.02
ADF (%)30.54 a43.21 b43.22 b45.21 b42.22 b2.37
0.00% probiotics (control), 0.30% SC and 0.05% CB (P1), 0.30% SC and 0.10% CB (P2), 0.60% SC and 0.05% CB (P3), and 0.60% SC and 0.10% CB (P4) of the DM weight of the basal diet. Different letter superscripts indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cai, L.; Li, M.; Zhou, S.; Xu, Q. The Mixture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Clostridium butyricum Could Promote Rumen Fermentation and Improve the Growth Performance of Goats in Hot Summer. Metabolites 2023, 13, 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13010104

AMA Style

Cai L, Li M, Zhou S, Xu Q. The Mixture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Clostridium butyricum Could Promote Rumen Fermentation and Improve the Growth Performance of Goats in Hot Summer. Metabolites. 2023; 13(1):104. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13010104

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cai, Liyuan, Min Li, Shuyi Zhou, and Qingbiao Xu. 2023. "The Mixture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Clostridium butyricum Could Promote Rumen Fermentation and Improve the Growth Performance of Goats in Hot Summer" Metabolites 13, no. 1: 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13010104

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop