Next Article in Journal
Contrasting Hygiene-Related Gastrointestinal Infections and Stress-Related Diseases at a Primary Health Care Facility within a Sub-Saharan African City: Before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimal Cut-Off Values for Body Mass Index and Fat Mass Index Based on Age in Physically Active Males Using Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve
Previous Article in Journal
Anastomotic Leakage after Oesophagectomy: Upper Endoscopy or Computed Tomography First? Time Is of the Essence
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effects of Greek Orthodox Christian Fasting during Holy Week on Body Composition and Cardiometabolic Parameters in Overweight Adults
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Opinion

Role of Mind–Body Fitness in Obesity

by
Alexios Batrakoulis
Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Thessaly, 42100 Trikala, Greece
Diseases 2023, 11(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases11010001
Submission received: 24 November 2022 / Revised: 16 December 2022 / Accepted: 19 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022

Abstract

:
Various mind–body fitness modalities such as Pilates, yoga, Tai Chi, and Qigong have become an accepted part of the physical activity, exercise, and leisure sector, serving several populations eligible for meditative movement activities. However, no robust evidence is present in the current literature supporting the efficacy of these meditative movement activities on health, fitness, and well-being markers among obese adults. Interestingly, the feasibility and safety of mind–body fitness programs in this cohort are still questionable. However, the limited available data show the beneficial role of such alternative exercise options in improving numerous physical fitness and cardiometabolic health-related indicators. The major role of mind–body fitness in obese individuals is to promote muscle control, body functionality, flexibility, and balance while reducing physical limitations, chronic pain, and stress through sessions integrating body postures, efficient breathing patterns, meditation, and relaxation. Such a bodily movement-based approach may be associated with increased physical performance and improved cardiometabolic as well as mental health. However, data on anthropometric characteristics, body composition and cardiovascular disease risk factors modification are somewhat equivocal. Future studies are needed to investigate a wider spectrum of physical fitness and cardiometabolic health parameters, since obese people are likely to demonstrate poor functional capacity, impaired glucose control, lipid disorder, and abnormal blood pressure levels.

Obesity is a complex metabolic disease associated with several comorbidities, affecting almost one in three adults in the Western world, and thus, it is considered a major public health issue [1]. Notably, obese individuals are likely to show insufficient physical activity levels [2], impaired mental health [3], and poor functional capacity [4]. Taking into account that various psychophysiological health factors play a vital role in the prevention, management and treatment of obesity, physical activity, structured exercise, and eating patterns have been reported as key behavioral tools for individuals with obesity [5]. Several exercise types are currently highlighted as some of the most popular trends in the health and fitness industry worldwide [6], engaging various populations, including those with unhealthy weight. Interestingly, physical activity and exercise are highly recommended to obese individuals as a foundational piece of the treatment puzzle [7]. Specifically, traditional combined (aerobic and resistance) training appears the most beneficial exercise mode for improving a wide spectrum of cardiometabolic health parameters among obese adults [8].
However, various mind–body fitness modalities such as Pilates, yoga, Tai Chi, and Qigong are broadly used by people who seek to achieve physical and mental health outcomes [9,10,11,12,13]. In particular, meditative movement activities seem to be a feasible physical movement strategy for obese individuals, since such alternative, multicomponent modalities are not as demanding as other popular fitness trends from both a physiological and psychological standpoint [14,15]. In general, mind–body fitness focuses on body postures and movements with an emphasis on breathing techniques to promote a state of calmness and relaxation [10,16]. Hence, mind–body fitness interventions have been reported as a therapeutic or preventive exercise approach [12], demonstrating an increasing popularity in the exercise community [6,9]. However, it is not clear whether all these practices including meditative and physical elements are effective for enhancing several health, fitness, and well-being indices among obese individuals. Recent evidence shows that the most well-known and established mind–body fitness activities such as Pilates and yoga may induce positive changes in numerous psychophysiological markers in individuals with obesity [17,18]. This is an important finding considering that the majority of the world adult population belong to this cohort [1], while they do not meet the minimum recommended physical activity levels nowadays [19]. Surely, further research warrants an investigation into whether mind–body fitness is able to create a more size-inclusive exercise environment for individuals living in larger bodies.
Mind–body fitness interventions are used as alternative exercise types focusing on a group of mental, physical, and spiritual disciplines, aiming to provide a feasible and safe exercise experience to those who are previously inactive or unexperienced with these particular alternative training methods. Typically, such movement-based programs combine physical postures, breathing techniques, and sometimes meditation or relaxation aiming to enhance physical and emotional well-being. In the Western world, mind–body fitness places a lot of attention to the physical fitness aspects; however, both mental focus and spiritual energy are still fundamental components of sessions of this kind. In general, such meditative movement activities mainly emphasize on inner peace and physical energy stimulation [20]. One of the foundational training characteristics of all mind–body fitness approaches is flow, aiming to link each body posture to the appropriate breath in order to ensure flow in every pose and transition. Such an approach strategically activates the whole body without promoting muscle exhaustion. [10]. However, extreme and forceful poses should be avoided by individuals with obesity in order to reduce the risk of injury, and therefore, supervision by a qualified instructor seems to be a critical factor affecting safety and ensuring a user-friendly exercise space [21].
There is accumulating evidence showing that mind–body fitness modalities may induce positive changes in body composition [22,23,24,25], physical fitness [26,27], cardiovascular disease risk factors [13,28,29,30,31], chronic pain [32,33], and mental health [34,35] in several populations, including those affected by obesity. Hence, mind–body fitness has been defined as a component of integrated therapeutic or preventive interventions for those struggling with obesity or/and other common lifestyle-related chronic diseases [36]. Interestingly, such alternative exercise approaches appear to be effective for eliciting beneficial alterations in weight-related outcomes [22,24] in individuals with obesity. This fact is important considering the increasing popularity of mind–body fitness in the health and fitness industry, showing that regular users are primarily interested in improving health and managing body weight [37]. Given that persons with obesity commonly demonstrate physical limitations, movement dysfunctions, postural deviations, and poor stamina [4], mind–body fitness programs appear to be user-friendly and pain-free exercise strategies for this underserved population seeking for an inclusive exercise environment [38]. Figure 1 summarizes the effects of mind–body fitness interventions on cardiometabolic health, physical performance, and well-being in overweight and obese individuals [17,18,25,30,39].
Mind–body exercise interventions appear a useful addition to developing obesity management programs that focus not only on weight control but also on health and fitness benefits [12]. Pilates and yoga have been investigated more compared to Tai Chi and Qigong among individuals with obesity. Specifically, Pilates training studies primarily emphasize on body composition and physical fitness improvements. As for cardiometabolic and mental health-related markers, no robust data were reported across all trials studying these particular responses among obese persons in a free-living environment [17]. Overall, the feasibility of Pilates method as a common exercise mode for obese people is not clear. Stronger evidence is needed to identify whether this mind–body exercise modality can play an essential role in the exercise prescription guidelines for sedentary obese individuals [24]. It is worth noticing that data regarding the effectiveness of Pilates-based training programs on mental health-related indicators are currently scarce in this population.
Similarly, the feasibility of yoga practice as a mind–body fitness modality for people with unhealthy weight is still questionable, since this alternative exercise form has not been widely linked to a beneficial role in program design for obese individuals. Interestingly, yoga is commonly incorporated into an integrated lifestyle intervention as a component that promotes regular bodily movement in conjunction with healthy eating patterns, meditation, and behavior change consultation. Such an approach is not able to identify whether or not yoga alone can elicit beneficial alterations in various psychophysiological measures among obese individuals [18]. This is a common issue when examining the efficacy of yoga on health, fitness, and wellness, since yoga is not clearly considered as a type of physical exercise [36]. Thus, future research in this area should take this element into account, aiming to provide stronger evidence regarding the role of yoga in preventing, managing, and treating obesity.
With regard to Tai Chi and Qigong practice, limited data are currently available, and it is notable that these particular mind–body fitness activities are also classified as martial arts, which is something that may play a role in summarizing all relevant data from studies investigating Tai Chi and Qigong. Overall, both modalities demonstrate mixed results in various anthropometric and body composition parameters when comparing overweight/obese adults with inactive controls [25,39]. In addition, Tai Chi shows some potential since it favors positive changes in central obesity [40] and several cardiometabolic health-related indicators [13,30]. However, further robust trials are needed to provide conclusive evidence on the efficacy and safety of Tai Chi for improving major cardiovascular disease risk factors in adults with impaired metabolic health.
In summary, mind–body fitness activities such as Pilates, yoga, Tai Chi, and Qigong have not been reported as physically and mentally demanding as other conventional, but highly recommended types of exercise such as aerobic and resistance training, to overweight and obese individuals. Taking this into consideration, mind–body fitness interventions for people demonstrating poor body functionality and various physical limitations may be an attainable and pain-free exercise approach for inducing health, performance, and well-being benefits. However, further randomized controlled trials with larger samples and superior methodological quality are warranted to investigate the effects of mind–body fitness programs in individuals with obesity, aiming to identify optimal regimens that empower practitioners to interpret research findings into practical application in a real-world setting. Specifically, adherence to mind–body fitness programs as well as training configuration should be a priority in future research attempts, since compliance and dropout rates as well as training parameters such as frequency, intensity, time, and type are not well described, and in some studies, they are not even available, thus highlighting a significant gap in the current literature. This is important since mind–body fitness activities require a considerable amount of time on a regular basis (3–5 sessions/week, 60–90 min/session). Given that lack of free time has been reported as the primary exercise barrier in adults [41], while people with unhealthy weight demonstrate high attrition and low adherence to exercise [42], such a demanding weekly time commitment may not be attractive to obese individuals who seek to engage in mind–body fitness programs on a regular basis.
In conclusion, given that these meditative movement activities have been documented as alternative exercise modes frequently included in physically based lifestyle interventions with a focus on weight management and health promotion, current exercise prescription guidelines for obese individuals should take these remarks into consideration. Interestingly, meditation appears to be a common component among all mind–body fitness practices, which may play a vital role in mental health enhancement and cardiovascular risk reduction [43]. Thus, future recommendations for this population may include mind–body fitness practices as an adjunct modality, aiming to promote favorable alterations in various health, performance, and well-being aspects. However, the weak evidence and conflicting results produced by studies investigating the impact of mind–body fitness among obese persons in real-world conditions show that such alternative movement-based activities are clearly not a game changer for obesity.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Overweight and Obesity. WHO Fact Sheet N°311 Website. Available online: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight (accessed on 9 June 2021).
  2. Do, K.; Brown, R.E.; Wharton, S.; Ardern, C.I.; Kuk, J.L. Association between cardiorespiratory fitness and metabolic risk fac6tors in a population with mild to severe obesity. BMC Obes. 2018, 5, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. De Wit, L.M.; van Straten, A.; van Herten, M.; Penninx, B.W.; Cuijpers, P. Depression and body mass index, a u-shaped association. BMC Public Health 2009, 9, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Pataky, Z.; Armand, S.; Muller-Pinget, S.; Golay, A.; Allet, L. Effects of Obesity on Functional Capacity. Obesity 2014, 22, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Montesi, L.; El Ghoch, M.; Brodosi, L.; Calugi, S.; Marchesini, G.; Dalle Grave, R. Long-term weight loss maintenance for obesity: A multidisciplinary approach. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2016, 9, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Kercher, V.M.; Kercher, K.; Bennion, T.; Levy, P.; Alexander, C.; Amaral, P.C.; Li, Y.-M.; Han, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, R.; et al. 2022 Fitness Trends from around the Globe. ACSMs Health Fit. J. 2022, 26, 21–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Johnson, N.A.; Sultana, R.N.; Brown, W.J.; Bauman, A.E.; Gill, T. Physical activity in the management of obesity in adults: A position statement from Exercise and Sport Science Australia. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2021, 24, 1245–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Batrakoulis, A.; Jamurtas, A.Z.; Metsios, G.S.; Perivoliotis, K.; Liguori, G.; Feito, K.; Riebe, D.; Thompson, W.R.; Angelopoulos, T.J.; Krustrup, P.; et al. Comparative efficacy of five exercise types on cardiometabolic health in overweight and obese adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 2022, 15, e008243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Clarke, T.C.; Barnes, P.M.; Black, L.I.; Stussman, B.J.; Nahin, R.L. Use of yoga, meditation, and chiropractors among U.S. adults aged 18 and older. NCHS Data Brief 2018, 325, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  10. Desikachar, K.; Bragdon, L.; Bossart, C. The yoga of healing: Exploring yoga’s holistic model for health and well-being. Int. J. Yoga Ther. 2005, 15, 17–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Von Sperling de Souza, M.; Brum Vieira, C. Who are the people looking for the Pilates method? J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2006, 10, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. La Forge, R. Mind-Body Fitness: Encouraging Prospects for Primary and Secondary Prevention. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 1997, 11, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Huston, P.; McFarlane, B. Health benefits of tai chi: What is the evidence? Can. Fam. Physician 2016, 62, 881–890. [Google Scholar]
  14. Batrakoulis, A.; Jamurtas, A.Z.; Fatouros, I.G. High-Intensity Interval Training in Metabolic Diseases: Physiological Adaptations. ACSMs Health Fit. J. 2021, 25, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Batrakoulis, A.; Fatouros, I.G. Psychological adaptations to high-intensity interval training in overweight and obese adults: A topical review. Sports 2022, 10, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wells, C.; Kolt, G.S.; Bialocerkowski, A. Defining Pilates exercise: A systematic review. Complement. Ther. Med. 2012, 20, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Batrakoulis, A. Psychophysiological Adaptations to Pilates Training in Overweight and Obese Individuals: A Topical Review. Diseases 2022, 10, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Batrakoulis, A. Psychophysiological Adaptations to Yoga Practice in Overweight and Obese Individuals: A Topical Review. Diseases 2022, 10, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bull, F.C.; Al-Ansari, S.S.; Biddle, S.; Borodulin, K.; Buman, M.P.; Cardon, G.; Carty, C.; Chaput, J.P.; Chastin, S.; Chou, R.; et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br. J. Sports Med. 2020, 54, 1451–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Collins, C. Yoga: Intuition, preventive medicine, and treatment. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 1998, 27, 563–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cramer, H.; Ostermann, T.; Dobos, G. Injuries and other adverse events associated with yoga practice: A systematic review of epidemiological studies. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2017, 21, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Caldwell, A.E.; Purcel, S.A.; Gray, B.; Smieja, H.; Catenacci, V.A. The impact of yoga on components of energy balance in adults with overweight or obesity: A systematic review. Obes. Sci. Pract. 2021, 8, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Aladro-Gonzalvo, A.R.; Machado-Díaz, M.; Moncada-Jiménez, J.; Hernández-Elizondo, J.; Araya-Vargas, G. The effect of Pilates exercises on body composition: A systematic review. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2012, 16, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Wu, Z.; Ye, X.; Xu, X. Pilates for Overweight or Obesity: A Meta-Analysis. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 643455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Larkey, L.K.; James, D.; Belyea, M.; Jeong, M.; Smit, L.L. Body Composition Outcomes of Tai Chi and Qigong Practice: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2018, 25, 487–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Shin, S. Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Yoga Practice on Physical Fitness in the Elderly. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Campos, R.R.; Dias, J.M.; Pereira, L.M.; Obara, K.; Barreto, M.S.; Silva, M.F.; Mazuquin, B.F.; Christofaro, D.G.; Fernandes, R.A.; Iversen, M.D.; et al. Effect of the Pilates method on physical conditioning of healthy subjects: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 2016, 56, 864–873. [Google Scholar]
  28. Khoshnaw, D.M.; Ghadge, A.A. Yoga as a complementary therapy for metabolic syndrome: A narrative review. J. Integr. Med. 2021, 19, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, Z.; Ye, X.; Xia, Y.; Song, H.; Wang, Y.; Guan, Y.; Shen, Z.; Chen, W.; Jiang, T.; Wu, H.; et al. Effect of Pilates on Glucose and Lipids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 641968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chau, J.P.C.; Leung, L.Y.L.; Liu, X.; Lo, S.H.S.; Choi, K.C.; Zhao, J.; Chiang, H.C.Y. Effects of Tai Chi on health outcomes among community-dwelling adults with or at risk of metabolic syndrome: A systematic review. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract. 2021, 44, 101445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lauche, R.; Peng, W.; Ferguson, C.; Cramer, H.; Frawley, J.; Adams, J.; Sibbritt, D. Efficacy of Tai Chi and qigong for the prevention of stroke and stroke risk factors: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Medicine 2017, 96, e8517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Posadzki, P.; Ernst, E.; Terry, R.; Lee, M.S. Is yoga effective for pain? A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Complement. Ther. Med. 2011, 19, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wong, C.M.; Rugg, B.; Geere, J.A. The effects of Pilates exercise in comparison to other forms of exercise on pain and disability in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Musculoskelet. Care 2022. online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hendriks, T.; de Jong, J.; Cramer, H. The Effects of Yoga on Positive Mental Health among Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2017, 23, 505–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fleming, K.M.; Herring, M.P. The effects of pilates on mental health outcomes: A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Complement. Ther. Med. 2018, 37, 80–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Brinsley, J.; Girard, D.; Smout, M.; Davison, K. Is yoga considered exercise within systematic reviews of exercise interventions? A scoping review. Complement. Ther. Med. 2021, 56, 102618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Clarke, T.C.; Black, L.I.; Stussman, B.J.; Barnes, P.M.; Nahin, R.L. Trends in the use of complementary health approaches among adults: United States, 2002–2012. Natl. Health Stat. Rep. 2015, 79, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  38. Luque, M. Create an inclusive experience for special populations. IDEA Fit. J. 2016, 13, 40–47. [Google Scholar]
  39. De Souza, F.; Lanzendorf, F.N.; de Souza, M.M.M.; Schuelter-Trevisol, F.; Trevisol, D.J. Effectiveness of martial arts exercise on anthropometric and body composition parameters of overweight and obese subjects: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Siu, P.M.; Yu, A.P.; Chin, E.C.; Yu, D.S.; Hui, S.S.; Woo, J.; Fong, D.Y.; Wei, G.X.; Irwin, M.R. Effects of Tai Chi or Conventional Exercise on Central Obesity in Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Three-Group Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2021, 174, 1050–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Trost, S.G.; Owen, N.; Bauman, A.E.; Sallis, J.F.; Brown, W. Correlates of adults’ participation in physical activity: Review and update. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2002, 34, 1996–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Burgess, E.; Hassmen, P.; Welvaert, M.; Pumpa, K.L. Behavioural treatment strategies improve adherence to lifestyle intervention programmes in adults with obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Obes. 2017, 7, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Levine, G.N.; Lange, R.A.; Bairey-Merz, C.N.; Davidson, R.J.; Jamerson, K.; Mehta, P.K.; Michos, E.D.; Norris, K.; Ray, I.B.; Saban, K.L.; et al. Meditation and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2017, 6, e002218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The psychophysiological effects of mind–body fitness interventions in overweight and obese individuals. MHR: maximum heart rate; QoL: quality of life; RPE: rating of perceived exertion [17,18,25,30,39].
Figure 1. The psychophysiological effects of mind–body fitness interventions in overweight and obese individuals. MHR: maximum heart rate; QoL: quality of life; RPE: rating of perceived exertion [17,18,25,30,39].
Diseases 11 00001 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Batrakoulis, A. Role of Mind–Body Fitness in Obesity. Diseases 2023, 11, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases11010001

AMA Style

Batrakoulis A. Role of Mind–Body Fitness in Obesity. Diseases. 2023; 11(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases11010001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Batrakoulis, Alexios. 2023. "Role of Mind–Body Fitness in Obesity" Diseases 11, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases11010001

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop