Next Article in Journal
Impact of IT Devices Production Quality on the Level of Protection of Processed Information against the Electromagnetic Infiltration Process
Next Article in Special Issue
A Hybrid Microenergy Storage System for Power Supply of Forest Wireless Sensor Nodes
Previous Article in Journal
Feedforward Interpolation Error Compensation Method for Field Weakening Operation Region of PMSM Drive
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prototyping of an All-pMOS-Based Cross-Coupled Voltage Multiplier in Single-Well CMOS Technology for Energy Harvesting Utilizing a Gastric Acid Battery
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Systematic Equalizer Design Technique Using Backward Directional Design

Electronics 2019, 8(9), 1053; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8091053
by Gihyeon Ji
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Electronics 2019, 8(9), 1053; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8091053
Submission received: 3 September 2019 / Revised: 16 September 2019 / Accepted: 16 September 2019 / Published: 18 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy Efficient Circuit Design Techniques for Low Power Systems)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

A well written and organized paper. Before it can be published, I would suggest authors to add a comparison table to compare your work with similar prior works. This table can provide a clear view on how your work advances the state-of-the-art. Thank you. 

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

 

Thank you for your sincere comments.

It is my response sheet for you. I hope my answers make you satisfy.

 

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear author, I can note the high quality of the presented manuscript. I think that your article will be interesting to readers of Electronics journal and very useful for some of them. My comments and suggestions you can find below.

Please, try to avoid emotional expressions in the paper like "dramatically" in line 20. 

Please, format your algorithms on pages 3 and 5 as a code, not as a figure.

The description of the parameters in figures 11, 13 and especially 16 should be moved in the text of the article for better readability.

Have you made comparisons your method with other design methods besides conventional method [11]? Please, write about it in the article.

Also, I would like to read about the limitations and recommendations for the use of your design method. In which cases it is worth using, and in which cases it is worth using the conventional method. Are there conditions when your method will give the worse result? Please, discuss it more.

You write in the conclusion section about faster design time. However, I did not find the results of this estimation in the manuscript. Please, fix it.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

 

Thank you for your sincere comments.

It is my response sheet for you. I hope my answers make you satisfy.

 

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop