Next Article in Journal
Automatic and Interactive Program Parallelization Using the Cetus Source to Source Compiler Infrastructure v2.0
Next Article in Special Issue
Fast Design Space Exploration and Multi-Objective Optimization of Wide-Band Noise-Canceling LNAs
Previous Article in Journal
Dual-Band 6 × 6 MIMO Antenna System for Glasses Applications Compatible with Wi-Fi 6E and 7 Wireless Communication Standards
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Accurate Bandgap Voltage Reference Ready-Indicator
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Tunable Microstrip Bandpass Filter with Two Concurrently Tuned Transmission Zeros

Department of Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Microelectronics, Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 16, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Electronics 2022, 11(5), 807; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11050807
Submission received: 12 February 2022 / Revised: 28 February 2022 / Accepted: 2 March 2022 / Published: 4 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Circuit and Signal Processing)

Abstract

:
In this paper, an electrically small tunable microstrip bandpass filter with two concurrently tuned transmission zeros (TZs) is presented. The filter consists of two coupled resonators and varactors as tuning elements. An application of a multipath coupling network results in TZs on both sides of the passband. The filter controlled by a single voltage has a wide tuning range from 370 MHz to 800 MHz and a low insertion loss ranging from 1.9 dB to 3.4 dB. To achieve high attenuation in the stopband, two sections of the designed filter were cascaded. Both one-section and two-section filters were validated by measurements. The obtained results are in a very good agreement with simulations.

1. Introduction

The continuous development of RF and microwave technology forces the research of new filter structures that are adjusted to the requirements of modern equipment. An important role among the different realizations of filters is played by the microstrip bandpass tunable filters, especially those of large tuning range, small size, high stopband attenuation, and low insertion loss in the passband. A common method for designing filters having high slope steepness and high stopband attenuation adopts high-order filter designs, but this approach leads to the large filter dimensions and can be the cause of their large insertion loss [1]. Another widely applied method is the addition to the filter response transmission zeros occurring in the transition or stop bands. This can be achieved in several ways: by adding open/short stubs to the filter network [2,3], by applying defected ground structures [4], by combining bandstop and bandpass filters [5,6,7], by combining lowpass and highpass filters [8], or by adopting the multipath coupling technique [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. The latter introduces the compensation of the signal crossing from the input to the output of the network. For this purpose, the cross-coupling technique [12,13,14,20,25], the source load coupling technique [15,16,17,19], or the mixed coupling technique [18,21,22,23,24] is used. The application of the mentioned techniques is especially difficult for those widely tuned filters in which the tuning of the passband and transmission zeros occurs concurrently. Varactors are the most commonly used to tune microstrip filters due to voltage control that is energetically efficient. Therefore, the achievement of concurrent tuning leads to the independent control of several varactors [26,27,28,29]. However, filter structures having all varactors tuned with a single voltage can be found in the literature [3,16,17,19,22,23,24].
The requirements of a wide tuning range, steep slopes, high stopband attenuation, low insertion loss, and small size are difficult to meet simultaneously. Thus, in the case of low-order filters tuned in frequency around the octave, small stopband attenuation up to 30 dB [3,19,28,30] or small slope steepness [29] is often obtained. On the other hand, most filters with large slope steepness achieve a small tuning range [24,31]. Filters having a wide tuning range together with high slope steepness are commonly electrically large [19,32,33]. An effective method for improving slope steepness and stopband attenuation in the case of filter sections having small sizes and simple designs is cascading of several sections [32,34,35,36,37,38].
This paper describes a constant fractional bandwidth bandpass filter tuned over a wide frequency range that has two concurrently tuned transmission zeros located on both sides of the passband to improve the steepness of the slopes in the transition bands. The occurrence of transmission zeros is the result of the application of the multipath coupling technique. In Section 2, the lumped elements filter prototype is discussed in detail. The realization of the microstrip tunable filter is shown in Section 3, where its properties are investigated with circuit and full-wave simulations. In Section 4, the cascade connection of two sections of the proposed filter joined with an additional matching circuit is presented. In Section 5, the designed filters are compared with the other filters described in the literature. The filters’ parameters were experimentally verified with very good agreement between the simulations and measurements.

2. Lumped Element Prototype

Figure 1a shows a lumped element prototype of a triple-coupled double-tuned bandpass filter (TCDTF) proposed in this paper. The filter is built of two identical resonators ( C 1 , L 1 L 4 ) and two additional inductors L 5 . The center frequency of the resonators is
f 0 = 1 2 π ( L 1 + L 2 + L eq ) C 1
where
L eq = 2 L 3 L 4 2 L 3 + L 4
is an equivalent inductance of the coupling PI network built of inductors L 3 and L 4 . The network introduces the triple inductive coupling within the filter with the coupling coefficient [39]
K = L eq L 1 + L 2 + L eq .
The proposed filter is a modification of the double-coupled double-tuned filter (DCDTF) shown in Figure 1b, invented by the authors and described in their previous publication [40]. The example characteristics of both filters are compared in Figure 2 for f 0 = 489 MHz and K = 0.05 . The TCDTF parameters are C 1 = 3.6 pF, L 1 = 23 nH, L 2 = 5 nH, L 3 = 1.75 nH, L 4 = 2.5 nH, L 5 = 12.25 nH, and the DCDTF parameters are C 1 = 3.6 pF, L 1 = 23 nH, L 2 = 5 nH, L 3 = 0.73 nH. Both filters have the same equivalent inductance of the coupling network. The center frequencies of both passband filters are close to the center frequencies of their resonators. The application of an additional inductance L 4 in the network shown in Figure 1a results in a transmission zero appearance below its center frequency. This increases the slope steepness of this filter response in the lower transition band compared to the network depicted in Figure 1b. The additional inductances L 5 transform the source and load impedance upwards. Its influence on the filter characteristics is shown in Figure 3. As can be seen, the L 5 inductances affect the insertion loss, stopband attenuation, and the return loss of the network without changing the position of the two transmission zeros and the center frequency. Increasing the L 5 inductance improves the steepness of the slope within the lower transition band of the filter, the in-band flatness, and the out-of-band attenuation.
The frequencies of the transmission zeros are given by the following equation:
f 1 , 2 = 2 L 1 L 3 + 2 L 2 L 3 + 2 L 2 L 4 ± L 3 L 4 L 4 L 3 2 L 4 + 4 L 2 2 ( 2 L 3 + L 4 ) 4 L 2 L 3 ( L 3 L 4 ) 8 π 2 C 1 L 1 2 L 3 + L 2 L 3 ( L 2 + 2 L 4 ) + L 1 L 3 L 4 + 2 L 2 ( L 3 + L 4 ) .
The influence of other filter components on the position of transmission zeros is shown in Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6. The figures show the results of the parametric analysis performed for a constant coupling coefficient K = 0.05 and a constant value of frequency f 0 = 489 MHz. The results shown in Figure 4 were obtained by varying the values of inductances L 3 and L 4 with a constant equivalent inductance L eq = 1.46 nH.
It can be seen that the response of the filter within its passband and the position of the right transmission zero remain practically unchanged. The position of the left transmission zero depends on the ratio of inductances L 4 to L 3 . Increasing the ratio causes the shift of the left TZ towards higher frequencies together with a weak reduction of the attenuation within the stopband. Figure 5 and Figure 6 show the effects of varying L 1 and L 2 on the shape of the frequency response and the matching of the filter. The test was carried out by changing the values of inductances L 1 and L 2 while keeping their sum constant and equal to 28 nH in order to maintain the center frequency constant. Decreasing the value of the inductance L 2 causes the appearance of ripples of s 11 and s 21 in the passband and lowers the mean value of the return loss. Synchronously, the transmission zero frequencies approach each other, increasing the slope steepness of s 21 in the transition bands. The out-of-band attenuation of the filter remains virtually unchanged.
The initial inductances of L 1 , L 2 , L eq were determined as for an ordinary dual-tuned network having the coupling coefficient 0.05, the load impedance 70 Ω , and a center frequency of 400 MHz. Then, the inductances L 3 and L 4 were found to achieve particular TZ frequencies. Finally, the inductance L 5 was selected to obtain the transformation of 50 Ω port impedance to filter load impedance of 70 Ω .

3. Tunable Microstrip Filter

In this section, the microstrip realization of a tunable triple-coupled double-tuned filter is presented. The assumed filter tuning range is 400 MHz to 800 MHz. The network in Figure 7 was performed on a Rogers 5870 substrate of ε r = 2.33 and thickness h = 1.5 mm. The inductances L 1 L 5 of the lumped element prototype are replaced by the sections TL1–TL5 of the transmission lines, the parameters of which are given in Table 1. The L 3 is replaced by the TL3 transmission line grounded by two vias. The TL3 parameters were found considering the contribution of the two vias estimated as 0.2 nH. The line lengths l and their characteristic impedances Z 0 are related to the inductances L 1 L 5 by the equation:
ω L = Z 0 tan β l β l = 2 π l λ 1 for f max
which describes the input reactance of the shorted transmission line. All the transmission lines are electrically short for the highest filter operating frequency f max . Each capacitor C 1 is replaced by a push–pull connection of eight 1SV280 varactors that have a capacitance variation 1.3–5.5 pF, a lead inductance of 0.4 nH, and series resistance R s = 0.44 Ω each. This approach reduced the overall series resistance to 0.22 Ω and the lead inductance to 0.2 nH of the reactor. The varactor groups are connected between the TL1a and TL1b line segments. The control voltage V c is applied to the varactors through the resistors of R c = 33 k Ω with the application of the decoupling capacitors C c = 100 pF.
Figure 8 shows the layout of the designed filter with the dimensions of all the individual lines marked. The topology of the filter simplifies its compact realization by placing the varactor polarization networks within the unused inner surfaces of the resonators. The picture of the completed prototype fabricated in the standard PCB technology is shown in Figure 9. The dimensions of the filter are 30 × 35 mm including SMA connectors.
The filter parameters were measured with the Agilent PNA-L N5230A vector network analyzer. The filter was also simulated in the frequency domain with the CST Microwave Studio software. For simulation purposes, each varactor was modeled as a series connections of the capacitance, the series resistance, and the lead inductance. During the simulations, the capacitances were tuned experimentally to achieve the same values of the center frequencies as those measured.
In Figure 10 and Figure 11, the comparison between the measurements (solid lines) and simulations (dashed lines) of the scattering parameters in the frequency range of 200 MHz to 1000 MHz is shown for the control voltage variation from 1 V to 18 V. As one can see, a very good agreement is observed, which shows that manufacturing the proposed filter in standard PCB technology provides sufficient mechanical accuracy. The measured tuning range extends from 370 MHz to 800 MHz. Within the whole tuning range, the bandwidth of the filter varies monotonically from 23 MHz to 48 MHz, but the relative bandwidth remains practically unchanged. The insertion loss is better than 3.4 dB at 370 MHz and decreases monotonically up to 1.9 dB at 800 MHz. It can be reduced by increasing the coupling coefficient or applying varactors having lower equivalent serial resistance. The minimal return loss is about 19 dB at frequency 370 MHz, increases to 35 dB at 600 MHz, and then decreases to 25 dB at 800 MHz. Tuning of the filter weekly affects the attenuation introduced by both transmission zeros. It is about 72 dB for the lower TZ and more than 47 dB for the upper TZ. Figure 12 shows the results of s 21 measurements in the frequency range extended to 3 GHz. As can be seen, the value of out-of-band attenuation close to 25 dB is maintained up to 1.6 GHz, which is next to double the maximum tuning frequency. Over 1.6 GHz, the attenuation decreases due to a parasitic passband that occurs at 2.5 GHz, which is determined solely by the filter topology and is practically independent of the control voltage.
Figure 13, Figure 14 and Figure 15 show the current density distributions at 504 MHz, 340 MHz, and 563 MHz determined by the simulations. The frequencies correspond to the center frequency and both TZs depicted in the filter response shown in Figure 11 for the control voltage of 4.7 V. For the center frequency 504 MHz, while the energy is transmitted from input to output with little insertion loss, the current amplitudes are very similar in both resonators. The occurrence of transmission zeros at 340 MHz and 563 MHZ is the result of the compensation of currents entering the particular nodes of the network. At node C located at the junction of TL1a, TL2, and TL5 lines on the output port side of the filter, the compensation occurs at both TZ frequencies. This effect is also illustrated in Figure 16, where the amplitude of the current I 11 flowing along the line TL5 and the phase difference of the currents I 9 and I 10 flowing along the lines TL1a and TL2 are shown as functions of frequency. It can be seen that at both frequencies 340 MHz and 563 MHz the current I 11 is close to zero and the phase shift between the currents I 9 and I 10 is 180 deg. It can be further seen in Figure 14 that, at lower TZ frequency, the compensation of the currents I 4 and I 8 , which excite the second resonator, is also present. This effect is possible due to the coupling realized by means of the TL4 line. The amplitudes of the currents flowing through nodes A and B are shown in Figure 17 and Figure 18, respectively. For both nodes, the currents I 4 and I 8 are practically identical at the lower TZ frequency of 340 MHz and they are about 15 dB smaller than for higher TZ of 563 MHz. Due to the double compensation, the attenuation achieved for the lower TZ is about 25 dB higher than for the upper TZ. It should be mentioned that for the 340 MHz frequency, the current I 6 is practically cancelled.

4. Two-Section Filter

Due to the small size of the described filter, an easy way to further improve the attenuation in the stopband and to increase the steepness slope in the transition band is to cascade two sections. Two possible realizations of such a filter are shown in Figure 19. Obtaining the desired frequency characteristics requires reducing the mutual electromagnetic coupling between two sections placed close to each other and decreasing the loading of the first section by the second. The load reduction is achieved by moving the ports used for the interconnection of the two sections towards the ground to the position near the center of the LT2 line. This is equivalent to the upward transformation of the load impedance of interconnected resonators. To improve the shape of the passband response of the filter, an additional T-network is used for section interconnection. It consists of three transmission line sections that act as two series inductors of 2.1 nH and one parallel inductor of 6 nH. The values of the inductors were chosen to improve the insertion loss and return loss in the whole tuning range of the filter. Both sections of the filter are tuned concurrently with a single voltage.
The mutual coupling between the sections usually leads to a significant deterioration of the filter properties, especially in the stopband. To illustrate this phenomenon, two layouts of the cascaded filter shown in Figure 19 were analyzed. In the first design (see Figure 19a), the sections were doubled and displaced in parallel by 20 mm. In the second design (Figure 19b) the mutual coupling between the sections was reduced by applying two sections of layouts being mirror image one of the other together with the parallel displacement by 20 mm and a perpendicular shift of 10 mm.
The results of s 21 simulations performed for both layouts are shown in Figure 20 for three center frequencies. It can be seen that the strong mutual coupling between the sections present in the layout of Figure 19a leads to a deterioration of the attenuation in the transition and stop bands and TZs disappearance. In the case of the second layout, the effect of coupling is much weaker and does not lead to essential degradation of the filter properties. In s 21 there are observed deep TZs, and the attenuation is practically twice as high (in dB) as for the single filter section.
The photo of the fabricated prototype of the two cascaded sections is shown in Figure 21. Figure 22 and Figure 23 show a comparison of the measured and simulated scattering parameters of the cascade connection of the two filter sections for the selected control voltages. In the operating band, the measured s 11 is below −9.5 dB and s 21 varies from −6.9 dB at 380 MHz to −3.5 dB at 790 MHz. Within the whole tuning range, the bandwidth of the filter varies monotonically from 17.5 MHz to 35.5 MHz. The relative bandwidth remains unchanged. Figure 24 shows the s 21 measured over a wider frequency range. The attenuation for frequencies below the passband is about 80 dB, while above the passband it is about 55 dB to 1.3 GHz. As in the case of a single section, an additional passband near 2.5 GHz existing regardless of the control voltage value is observed.

5. Discussion

Table 2 compares the proposed single section microstrip tuned TCDTF with other filters reported in the literature that feature at least two TZs. The parameters of the tuning range, the tuning range factor ( f max / f min ), bandwidth (BW), insertion loss (IL), electrical size, the number of TZs (NTZs), insertion loss in the bandstop (IL BS ), and the number of control voltages (NV) were compared. Filter dimensions are expressed in the guided wavelength ( λ g ) at the lowest operating frequency. The proposed filter has a constant fractional bandwidth as the filters reported in [22,24,25]. The filters [3,17,26] have a constant absolute bandwidth. The TCDTF has the second widest tuning range factor. Only the filter described in [19] is better in this respect, but it occupies an area almost 15 times larger. Most filters, including the proposed, have similar insertion losses not exceeding 4 dB. The filters [24,26] have a significantly larger IL. The out-of-band attenuation of a single TCDTF is about 26 dB, which is a typical value but 15 dB worse than the best filters [22,23]. Most of the compared filters are tuned with a single voltage. The filter described in [26] is tuned with five voltages, which allows for a constant absolute bandwidth over the full tuning range. A clear advantage of the proposed TCDTF over the benchmark filters is the smallest occupied area being half of the area of the smallest reference filter area [24].
Table 3 compares the parameters of the filter constructed from two TCDTF sections with other two-section filters reported in the literature. As for the single filter, the resulting tuning range is the second widest. At the cost of increased to 6.9 dB insertion loss, an out-of-band attenuation greater than 52 dB is obtained, which is 12 dB higher than the following filter [35]. The greatest advantage of the presented filter is that the aforementioned parameters were achieved despite the smallest dimensions among all comparable two-section filters.

6. Conclusions

This paper describes the tunable constant fractional bandwidth triple-coupled double-tuned bandpass filter. The proposed filter due to two concurrently tuned transmission zeros placed on the left and right sides of its bandpass has increased the slope steepness in both the transition bands. It has a wide tuning range spreading from 370 MHz to 800 MHz together with the insertion loss and out-of-band attenuation comparable to the other filters of similar class. It is worth noting that the location of the parasitic upper passband of the filter is independent of the control voltage. The main advantage of the filter is the small electrical size, which justifies the application of the cascade connection of two filter sections to improve the out-of-band attenuation and steepness of the slopes in the transition bands. It should also be emphasized that the area occupied by the cascade of two TCDR filters is only 14% greater than that of the single filter described in [24], which is the smallest reference single section filter.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.W., M.S. and A.N.; methodology, D.W. and M.S.; validation, M.S., M.M. and A.N.; formal analysis, D.W. and M.M.; investigation, A.N. and M.S.; resources, M.S. and M.M.; data curation, A.N. and M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, D.W. and A.N.; writing—review and editing, M.M. and A.N.; visualization, A.N.; supervision, D.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The results presented in this contribution are an outcome of statutory activities of the Department of Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Microelectronics of Silesian University of Technology financed by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BPFBandpass filter
BWBandwidth
DCDTFDouble-coupled double-tuned filter
ILInsertion loss
IL BS Insertion loss in bandstop
RFRadio frequency
TCDTFTriple-coupled double-tuned filter
TZTransmission zero

References

  1. Hong, J.-S.; Lancaster, M.J. Microstrip Filters for RF/Microwave Applications, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wu, Y.; Cui, L.; Zhuang, Z.; Wang, W.; Liu, Y.T. A simple planar dual-band bandpass filter with multiple transmission poles and zeros. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Exp. Briefs 2018, 65, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lu, D.; Barker, N.S.; Tang, X. A Simple frequency-agile bandpass filter with predefined bandwidth and stopband using synchronously tuned dual-mode resonator. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2017, 27, 983–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Qiao, H.; Guo, D.; Mou, J.; Li, M.; Ma, Z.; Lv, X. HIS-based bandpass filter with improved upper-stopband performance. Electron. Lett. 2018, 54, 363–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Saeedi, S.; Lee, J.; Sigmarsson, H.H. Tunable, high-Q, substrate-integrated, evanescent-mode cavity bandpass-bandstop filter cascade. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2016, 26, 240–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sigmarsson, H.H.; Naglich, E.; Lee, J.; Peroulis, D.; Chappell, W. Tunable bandpass and bandstop filter cascade for dynamic pole allocation. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation, Chicago, IL, USA, 8–14 July 2012. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yang, W.; Allen, W.N.; Psychogiou, D.; Peroulis, D. Tunable bandpass-bandstop filter cascade for VHF applications. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 17th Annual Wireless and Microwave Technology Conference (WAMICON), Clearwater, FL, USA, 11–13 April 2016. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wei, Z.; Yang, T.; Chi, P.-L.; Zhang, X.; Xu, R. A 10.23–15.7-GHz varactor-tuned microstrip bandpass filter with highly flexible reconfigurability. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Technol. 2021, 69, 4499–4509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Du, T.; Guan, B.; Zhang, P.; Gu, Y.; Wei, D. An intrinsically switched tunable CABW/CFBW bandpass filter. Electronics 2021, 10, 1318. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lin, W.; Zhou, K.; Wu, K. Tunable bandpass filters with one switchable transmission zero by only tuning resonances. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2021, 31, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yildirim, N.; Sen, O.A.; Karaaslan, M.; Pelz, D. A revision of cascade synthesis theory Covering cross-coupled filters. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Technol. 2002, 50, 1536–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cameron, R.J. General coupling matrix synthesis methods for Chebyshev filtering functions. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Technol. 1999, 47, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Schuster, C.; Kamrath, F.; Miek, D.; Polat, E.; Boe, P.; Frank, L.; Kienemund, C.; Jakoby, R.; Maune, H.; Hoft, M. Fully reconfigurable bandpass with continuously tunable center frequency and bandwidth featuring a constant filter characteristic. In Proceedings of the 2020 German Microwave Conference (GeMiC), Cottbus, Germany, 9–11 March 2020; pp. 236–239. [Google Scholar]
  14. Tian, D.; Feng, Q.; Xiang, Q. Synthesis applied 4th-order constant absolute bandwidth frequency-agile bandpass filter with cross-coupling. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 72287–72294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Amari, S. Direct synthesis of folded symmetric resonator filters with source-load coupling. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2001, 11, 264–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gao, L.; Rebeiz, G.M. A 0.97–1.53-GHz tunable four-pole bandpass filter with four transmission zeroes. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2019, 29, 195–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhou, W.-J.; Chen, J.-X. High-selectivity tunable balanced bandpass filter with constant absolute bandwidth. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Exp. Briefs 2017, 64, 917–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chu, Q.-X.; Wang, H. A compact open-loop filter with mixed electric and magnetic coupling. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Technol. 2008, 56, 431–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lu, D.; Tang, X.; Barker, N.S.; Feng, Y. Single-band and switchable dual-/single-band tunable BPFs with predefined tuning range, bandwidth, and selectivity. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Technol. 2018, 66, 1215–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, X.; Zou, C.; Xiang, Q. Fourth-order electrical tunable microstrip LC cross-coupled bandpass filter. In Proceedings of the Photonics & Electromagnetics Research Symposium, Rome, Italy, 17–20 June 2019; pp. 2076–2079. [Google Scholar]
  21. Shen, G.; Che, W.; Feng, W.; Wang, C. Realization of multiple transmission zeroes for bandpass filters with simple inline topology. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Exp. Briefs 2020, 67, 1029–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ohira, M.; Hashimoto, S.; Ma, Z.; Wang, X. Coupling-matrix-based systematic design of single-DC-bias-controlled microstrip higher order tunable bandpass filters with constant absolute bandwidth and transmission zeros. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Technol. 2019, 67, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cai, J.; Chen, J.-X.; Zhang, X.-F.; Yang, Y.-J.; Bao, Z.-H. Electrically varactor-tuned bandpass filter with constant bandwidth and self-adaptive transmission zeros. IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 2017, 11, 1542–1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Gao, L.; Lin, T.-W.; Rebeiz, G.M. Design of tunable multi-pole multi-zero bandpass filters and diplexer with high selectivity and isolation. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Reg. Pap. 2019, 66, 3831–3842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fan, M.; Song, K.; Zhu, Y.; Fan, Y. Compact bandpass-to-bandstop reconfigurable filter with wide tuning range. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2019, 29, 198–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, C.-F.; Wang, G.-Y.; Li, J.-J. Microstrip switchable and fully tunable bandpass filter with continuous frequency tuning range. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2018, 28, 500–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lee, T.-C.; Lee, J.; Peroulis, D. Dynamic bandpass filter shape and interference cancellation control utilizing bandpass–bandstop filter cascade. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Technol. 2015, 63, 2526–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kingsly, S.; Kanagasabai, M.; Alsath, M.G.N.; Shrivastav, A.K.; Subbaraj, S.; Selvam, Y.P.; Sivasamy, R.; Ramanarao, Y.V. Compact frequency and bandwidth tunable bandpass–bandstop microstrip filter. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2018, 28, 786–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, X.; Wu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, W. Simple coupled-line tunable bandpass filter with wide tuning range. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 82286–82293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chi, P.-L.; Yang, T.; Tsai, T.-Y. A fully tunable two-pole bandpass filter. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2015, 25, 292–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gomez-Garcia, R.; Munoz-Ferreras, J.-M.; Psychogiou, D. Fully-reconfigurable bandpass filter with static couplings and intrinsic-switching capabilities. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium (IMS), Honololu, HI, USA, 4–9 June 2017; pp. 914–917. [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, C.; Bian, Y.; Li, G.; Wu, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Xia, F.; Bai, D.; Sun, L.; et al. A tunable high temperature superconducting bandpass filter realized using semiconductor varactors. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2014, 24, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gomez-Garcia, R.; Munoz-Ferreras, J.-M.; Psychogiou, D. Dual-behavior resonator-based fully reconfigurable input reflectionless bandpass filters. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2019, 29, 35–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hsieh, L.-H.; Chang, K. Tunable microstrip bandpass filters with two transmission zeros. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Technol. 2003, 51, 520–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cho, Y.-H.; Rebeiz, G.M. Tunable 4-pole noncontiguous 0.7–2.1-GHz bandpass filters based on dual zero-value couplings. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Technol. 2015, 63, 1579–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Psychogiou, D.; Gomez-Garcia, R. Multi-mode-cavity-resonator-based bandpass filters with multiple levels of transfer-function adaptivity. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 24759–24765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lee, T.-C.; Yang, W.; Peroulis, D. Reconfigurable filter design using resonators as coupling structures. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 17–22 May 2015. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhao, K.; Gomez-Garcia, R.; Psychogiou, D. Tunable quasi-reflectionless bandpass filters using substrate integrated coaxial resonators. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Exp. Briefs 2022, 69, 379–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dishal, M. Design of dissipative band-pass filters producing desired exact amplitude-frequency characteristics. Proc. IRE 1949, 37, 1050–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Magnuski, M.; Wójcik, D.; Surma, M.; Noga, A. A compact widely tunable bandpass filter dedicated to preselectors. Electronics 2021, 10, 2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Lumped element bandpass filters: (a) TCDTF (this work), (b) DCDTF (described in [40]).
Figure 1. Lumped element bandpass filters: (a) TCDTF (this work), (b) DCDTF (described in [40]).
Electronics 11 00807 g001
Figure 2. S 21 response of the TCDTF (in this work) and DCDTF ([40]).
Figure 2. S 21 response of the TCDTF (in this work) and DCDTF ([40]).
Electronics 11 00807 g002
Figure 3. Effect of the L 5 inductance on the filter response.
Figure 3. Effect of the L 5 inductance on the filter response.
Electronics 11 00807 g003
Figure 4. Influence of the L 3 / L 4 ratio on the lower TZ position.
Figure 4. Influence of the L 3 / L 4 ratio on the lower TZ position.
Electronics 11 00807 g004
Figure 5. Influence of L 1 and L 2 inductances on the s 21 parameter.
Figure 5. Influence of L 1 and L 2 inductances on the s 21 parameter.
Electronics 11 00807 g005
Figure 6. Influence of L 1 and L 2 inductances on the s 11 parameter.
Figure 6. Influence of L 1 and L 2 inductances on the s 11 parameter.
Electronics 11 00807 g006
Figure 7. Transmission line implementation of the tunable TCDTF.
Figure 7. Transmission line implementation of the tunable TCDTF.
Electronics 11 00807 g007
Figure 8. Layout of the proposed tunable bandpass filter (all dimensions in mm).
Figure 8. Layout of the proposed tunable bandpass filter (all dimensions in mm).
Electronics 11 00807 g008
Figure 9. Photo of the fabricated prototype of the tunable microstrip bandpass filter.
Figure 9. Photo of the fabricated prototype of the tunable microstrip bandpass filter.
Electronics 11 00807 g009
Figure 10. Measured (solid lines) and simulated (dashed lines) s 11 of the proposed tunable bandpass filter for the nine selected control voltages.
Figure 10. Measured (solid lines) and simulated (dashed lines) s 11 of the proposed tunable bandpass filter for the nine selected control voltages.
Electronics 11 00807 g010
Figure 11. Measured (solid lines) and simulated (dashed lines) s 21 of the proposed tunable bandpass filter for the nine selected control voltages.
Figure 11. Measured (solid lines) and simulated (dashed lines) s 21 of the proposed tunable bandpass filter for the nine selected control voltages.
Electronics 11 00807 g011
Figure 12. Broadband measurements of the s 21 for the proposed filter for the nine selected control voltages.
Figure 12. Broadband measurements of the s 21 for the proposed filter for the nine selected control voltages.
Electronics 11 00807 g012
Figure 13. Current density distribution at the centre frequency (504 MHz) of the filter.
Figure 13. Current density distribution at the centre frequency (504 MHz) of the filter.
Electronics 11 00807 g013
Figure 14. Current density distribution at the lower TZ frequency (340 MHz).
Figure 14. Current density distribution at the lower TZ frequency (340 MHz).
Electronics 11 00807 g014
Figure 15. Current density distribution at the upper TZ frequency (563 MHz).
Figure 15. Current density distribution at the upper TZ frequency (563 MHz).
Electronics 11 00807 g015
Figure 16. I 11 current amplitude and the phase difference of the I 9 and I 10 currents at the node C for V c = 4.7 V.
Figure 16. I 11 current amplitude and the phase difference of the I 9 and I 10 currents at the node C for V c = 4.7 V.
Electronics 11 00807 g016
Figure 17. Amplitudes of the currents flowing through the node A.
Figure 17. Amplitudes of the currents flowing through the node A.
Electronics 11 00807 g017
Figure 18. Amplitudes of the currents flowing through the node B.
Figure 18. Amplitudes of the currents flowing through the node B.
Electronics 11 00807 g018
Figure 19. Layout of the cascade connection of the two filter sections (all dimensions in mm): (a) layout A, (b) layout B.
Figure 19. Layout of the cascade connection of the two filter sections (all dimensions in mm): (a) layout A, (b) layout B.
Electronics 11 00807 g019
Figure 20. Simulated s 21 performed for the two layouts shown in Figure 19.
Figure 20. Simulated s 21 performed for the two layouts shown in Figure 19.
Electronics 11 00807 g020
Figure 21. Photo of the cascade connection of the two filter sections.
Figure 21. Photo of the cascade connection of the two filter sections.
Electronics 11 00807 g021
Figure 22. Measured (solid lines) and simulated (dashed lines) s 11 of the cascade connection of the two filter sections for the eight selected control voltages.
Figure 22. Measured (solid lines) and simulated (dashed lines) s 11 of the cascade connection of the two filter sections for the eight selected control voltages.
Electronics 11 00807 g022
Figure 23. Measured (solid lines) and simulated (dashed lines) s 21 of the cascade connection of the two filter sections for the eight selected control voltages.
Figure 23. Measured (solid lines) and simulated (dashed lines) s 21 of the cascade connection of the two filter sections for the eight selected control voltages.
Electronics 11 00807 g023
Figure 24. S 21 of the cascade connection of the two filter sections measured in the wide frequency band for the eight selected control voltages.
Figure 24. S 21 of the cascade connection of the two filter sections measured in the wide frequency band for the eight selected control voltages.
Electronics 11 00807 g024
Table 1. Elements of the filters from Figure 7 and Figure 8.
Table 1. Elements of the filters from Figure 7 and Figure 8.
Line Z 0 ( Ω ) β l (deg) *
TL1a1383.25
TL1b1387.75
TL21014.8
TL3751.7
TL4916.6
TL513810.1
*—calculated at 370 MHz.
Table 2. Comparison between the proposed and the reference filters.
Table 2. Comparison between the proposed and the reference filters.
Ref.f (GHz) f max / f min BWIL (dB)Size * ( λ g × λ g )NTZsIL BS (dB)NV
[3]1.15–21.74115 ± 4 MHz (5.9–9.6%)2.4–3.60.06 × 0.242<251
[16]0.97–1.531.57-2–4.20.09 × 0.14<301
[17]1.6–2.271.41137 ± 2 MHz (6–8.5%)1.99–4.170.5 × 0.42<301
[19]0.75–1.872.4975–285 MHz (10–15.2%)1.2–4.20.38 × 0.132<241
[22]0.89–1.131.2739–54 MHz (4.4–4.8%)3.2–4.30.5 × 0.352<401
[23]0.89–1.131.6712–23 MHz (2.75–3.2%)1.34–2.920.16 × 0.142<401
[24]1.22–1.721.4161–103 MHz (5–6%)3–4.90.05 × 0.123<351
[25]0.79–1.592.0155–111 MHz (7%)1.3–2.10.16 × 0.112<203
[26]1.1–2.11.940 MHz (1.9–3.6%)4.4–6.10.06 × 0.272<255
This work0.37–0.82.1623–48 MHz (6%)1.9–3.40.05 × 0.062<261
*—calculated for the lowest operating frequency (given in the second column).
Table 3. Comparison between the cascaded TCDTF and the two-section reference filters.
Table 3. Comparison between the cascaded TCDTF and the two-section reference filters.
Ref.f (GHz) f max / f min BWIL (dB)Size * ( λ g × λ g )IL BS (dB)
[35]0.7–11.4239–68 MHz (5.5–6.8%)4.4–6.40.5 × 0.56<40
[36]1.7–2.51.4738–156 MHz (3.4–6.2%)<3.31.29 × 0.51<21.5
[37]0.119–0.239223–42 MHz (17.5–19.3%)<2.41-<28
[38]2.6–3.351.29109–181 MHz (4.2-5.4%)3.1–3.71.35 × 0.9<39
This work0.38-0.792.0817.5–35.5 MHz (4.6%)3.5–6.90.075 × 0.1<52
*—calculated for the lowest operating frequency (given in the second column).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Magnuski, M.; Wójcik, D.; Surma, M.; Noga, A. A Tunable Microstrip Bandpass Filter with Two Concurrently Tuned Transmission Zeros. Electronics 2022, 11, 807. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11050807

AMA Style

Magnuski M, Wójcik D, Surma M, Noga A. A Tunable Microstrip Bandpass Filter with Two Concurrently Tuned Transmission Zeros. Electronics. 2022; 11(5):807. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11050807

Chicago/Turabian Style

Magnuski, Mirosław, Dariusz Wójcik, Maciej Surma, and Artur Noga. 2022. "A Tunable Microstrip Bandpass Filter with Two Concurrently Tuned Transmission Zeros" Electronics 11, no. 5: 807. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11050807

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop