Next Article in Journal
Metal Criticality Determination for Australia, the US, and the Planet—Comparing 2008 and 2012 Results
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparing Approaches for the Integration of Stakeholder Perspectives in Environmental Decision Making
Previous Article in Journal
The Global Societal Steel Scrap Reserves and Amounts of Losses
Previous Article in Special Issue
Economic Efficiency or Gender Equality: Conceptualizing an Equitable “Social Framing” for Economic Evaluations to Support Gender Equality in Disaster Risk- and Environmental-Management Decision-Making
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Resources 2016, 5(3), 28; doi:10.3390/resources5030028

Improving Decision Making about Natural Disaster Mitigation Funding in Australia—A Framework

Risk Frontiers, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia
Academic Editor: Tim Prior
Received: 5 February 2016 / Revised: 10 August 2016 / Accepted: 9 September 2016 / Published: 19 September 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Difficult Decisions in Disaster Risk and Environmental Management)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1805 KB, uploaded 19 September 2016]   |  

Abstract

Economic losses from natural disasters pose significant challenges to communities and to the insurance industry. Natural disaster mitigation aims to reduce the threat to people and assets from natural perils. Good decisions relating to hazard risk mitigation require judgments both about the scientific and financial issues involved, i.e., the efficacy of some intervention, and the ethical or value principles to adopt in allocating resources. A framework for selecting a set of mitigation options within a limited budget is developed. Project selection about natural disaster mitigation options needs to trade off benefits offered by alternative investments (e.g., fatalities and injuries avoided, potential property and infrastructure losses prevented, safety concerns of citizens, etc.) against the costs of investment. Such costs include capital and on-going operational costs, as well as intangible costs, such as the impact of the project on the visual landscape or the loss of societal cohesion in the event of the relocation of part of a community. Furthermore, dollar costs of any potential project will need to be defined within some prescribed budget and time frame. Taking all of these factors into account, this paper develops a framework for good natural hazard mitigation decision making and selection. View Full-Text
Keywords: natural disaster mitigation; multicriteria decision making; risk reduction; cost effectiveness; value function natural disaster mitigation; multicriteria decision making; risk reduction; cost effectiveness; value function
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

van den Honert, R.C. Improving Decision Making about Natural Disaster Mitigation Funding in Australia—A Framework. Resources 2016, 5, 28.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Resources EISSN 2079-9276 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top