Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
The Abiotic Depletion Potential: Background, Updates, and Future
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Evaluation of Abiotic Resource LCIA Methods
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Resources 2016, 5(1), 14; doi:10.3390/resources5010014

Mineral Resources: Reserves, Peak Production and the Future

U.S. Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, MS 913, Reston, VA 20192, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Mario Schmidt
Received: 22 December 2015 / Revised: 8 February 2016 / Accepted: 16 February 2016 / Published: 29 February 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Consideration of Abiotic Natural Resources in Life Cycle Assessments)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [2339 KB, uploaded 10 March 2016]   |  


The adequacy of mineral resources in light of population growth and rising standards of living has been a concern since the time of Malthus (1798), but many studies erroneously forecast impending peak production or exhaustion because they confuse reserves with “all there is”. Reserves are formally defined as a subset of resources, and even current and potential resources are only a small subset of “all there is”. Peak production or exhaustion cannot be modeled accurately from reserves. Using copper as an example, identified resources are twice as large as the amount projected to be needed through 2050. Estimates of yet-to-be discovered copper resources are up to 40-times more than currently-identified resources, amounts that could last for many centuries. Thus, forecasts of imminent peak production due to resource exhaustion in the next 20–30 years are not valid. Short-term supply problems may arise, however, and supply-chain disruptions are possible at any time due to natural disasters (earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes) or political complications. Needed to resolve these problems are education and exploration technology development, access to prospective terrain, better recycling and better accounting of externalities associated with production (pollution, loss of ecosystem services and water and energy use). View Full-Text
Keywords: mineral resources; peak copper; sustainability; limits to growth; reserves; production; depletion; life cycle assessment; material flow; ecosystem services mineral resources; peak copper; sustainability; limits to growth; reserves; production; depletion; life cycle assessment; material flow; ecosystem services

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Meinert, L.D.; Robinson, G.R.; Nassar, N.T. Mineral Resources: Reserves, Peak Production and the Future. Resources 2016, 5, 14.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Resources EISSN 2079-9276 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top