Next Article in Journal
Scenario Modeling of Sustainable Development of Energy Supply in the Arctic
Previous Article in Journal
Pellet Production from Residual Biomass of Greenery Maintenance in a Small-Scale Company to Improve Sustainability
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Resources
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/resources10120123
resources-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Role of Edible Insects in Rural Livelihoods, and Identified Challenges in Vhembe District, Limpopo, South Africa

by
Zabentungwa T. Hlongwane
*,
Rob Slotow
and
Thinandavha C. Munyai
School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Resources 2021, 10(12), 123; https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10120123
Submission received: 21 October 2021 / Revised: 12 November 2021 / Accepted: 14 November 2021 / Published: 7 December 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Edible insects are an important natural commodity in rural areas that is used for household consumption and to generate income through trade. As a result, edible-insect trading is a profitable business that provides employment and improves the livelihoods of impoverished rural people. This study aimed at determining the socioeconomic benefits of and reasons for trading insects, and to assess if edible insects are included in economic development strategies in the Vhembe district of Limpopo province, South Africa. We conducted 72 questionnaire interviews targeting traders in 5 towns across the district. Five insect groups belonging to four insect orders are traded in informal markets of the district. Mopane worms (Gonimbrasia belina) were the most traded (42%) edible insects. Unemployment (45%) and the demand for edible insects (34%) were the major reasons for trading insects. Insect trading has numerous benefits; however, the provision of income (60%) and financial support (35%) were stated as the primary benefits. Despite several benefits associated with trading in insects, there are many challenges such as insect spoilage and a decline in the availability of edible insects in the wild. Edible insects play an important role in food security and the rural economy by generating employment opportunities for unemployed traders. Trading in insects is a traditional practice based on indigenous knowledge, which has persisted as an economic practice that improves rural livelihoods by reducing poverty and increases the human dignity of rural citizens. Only four governmental organisations in Limpopo included edible insects in economic development strategies. Trading insects is primarily an informal activity. The government could stimulate the activity and broaden and deepen the community benefits by providing infrastructure, access to harvest areas, financial support, and business training as part of a rural empowerment strategy to end hunger and poverty while creating employment opportunities in rural areas.

1. Introduction

The majority of rural populations in southern and eastern Africa are food-insecure and susceptible to malnutrition [1]. In addition, rural communities in Africa often experience high poverty levels that exacerbate malnutrition and food-insecurity problems [1,2,3]. Rural areas in South Africa are underdeveloped, and job opportunities are scarce [4]. As a result, most rural populations are poor and depend on cash handouts from the government in the form of social grants and the subsistence use of natural resources for survival [4]. The use of wild natural resources such as edible insects is a rural safety-net strategy against poverty and hunger [5].
Rural communities in developing countries are greatly dependent on indigenous natural resources, such as wild fruits and edible insects, to sustain their livelihoods [1,2,5,6,7,8]. Natural resources from the wild play an essential role in rural livelihoods in various communities in South Africa [9]. These natural resources are primarily used for household consumption and to generate income through trading [5,7,9]. As a result, wild fruits and edible insects play an important role in food security in rural areas [2,6]. They are also used as an alternative source of nutrition [2,10].
The consumption of insects is a common practice in South Africa, particularly in the Limpopo, Mpumalanga, Gauteng, and North West provinces [10,11]. Edible insects are consumed because they play a significant traditional role in nutritious diets in various parts of South Africa [11,12] as an important source of protein, vitamins, fats, amino acids, and minerals [10,13,14]. As a result, edible insects are regularly consumed or used to supplement diets during times of hardship and when staple food is scarce [15,16].
Edible-insect trading is a good business that generates income and improves livelihoods in rural communities. The generated income from edible insects varies from species to species. For instance, Gonimbrasia belina (mopane worm) is an economically important caterpillar in southern Africa, which plays a vital role in rural income generation [17,18,19]. Approximately 16,000 metric tons of mopane worms are traded per year, resulting in an income generation of about USD 39 million to 59 million a year in southern Africa [20]. Mopane worm traders in the town of Thohoyandou in the Limpopo province of South Africa can each generate an income of approximately USD 1393 (about ZAR 21,060) per year [21]. Other economically important species include termites, which are widely consumed across Africa, creating earning opportunities for rural traders and harvesters [12,22,23].
The edible-insect trade could become an excellent commercial business with significant economic returns that can improve the rural economy and create job opportunities [24]. It could hugely improve rural livelihoods, food security, and human nutrition in South Africa, and can be used as a strategy to alleviate poverty in poor communities [5,24]. Despite the significant role of edible insects in improving rural livelihoods, there is still no clear policy and legislation that governs edible-insect trading and consumption in South Africa. There is also limited information on policy documents and regulations that support and promote edible insects as food. Therefore, this study determines the socioeconomic benefits of trading insects in the Vhembe district, South Africa, and the associated reasons for trading insects by: (1) assessing if edible insects are included in economic development strategies in the Vhembe district of Limpopo Province of South Africa; (2) identifying economically important edible insect groups; and (3) determining the benefits and monetary value associated with trading edible insects. On the basis of our results, we provide policy recommendations to improve rural livelihoods and wellbeing.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study was conducted in December 2019 across six towns in the Vhembe district of Limpopo province in South Africa: Elim (23.1561° S 30.0554° E), Makhado (23.0462° S, 29.9047° E), Sibasa (22.9325° S, 30.4674° E), Thohoyandou (22.8785° S, 30.4818° E), Musina (22.3813° S, 30.0319° E), and Biaba (22.540° S, 30.0319° E).
A questionnaire comprising open-ended and closed questions was used to source information from traders in each town, selected on the basis of our observations of people buying and selling insects in the markets, bus terminals, taxi ranks, and along roadsides. The questionnaires were administered through structured face-to-face interviews with the traders. All interviews were individually conducted in the Tshivenda language (one of the 11 official languages in the South Africa). The surveyed number in each town was based on the scale of the trade that we observed, and we interviewed as many individuals as possible. Traders were asked to list the number of species that they were selling, and where they harvested or bought their insects for trading, to describe how they processed the insects, the reason for selling insects, socioeconomic benefits, and associated challenges with selling insects (Supplementary File S1).
The assessment of trading conditions considering food safety, hygiene, trading structure, shelter, storage, safety, sanitation and water availability was conducted across trading places in Vhembe district.
This study has been ethically reviewed and approved by the University Human and Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee (approval number HSS/0125/019D). Permission to conduct research in various towns was obtained from the Vhembe district municipality. All participants provided informed consent to participate in the study, and data were anonymised, confidentially treated, and securely stored.

2.2. Data Analysis

Data from the questionnaires were coded and entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. A chi-squared test of independence was used to determine if there were any significant differences in the number of insect species harvested and sold across small towns. The count data of respondents are presented in percentages. Chi-squared test analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

A total of 72 informal street vendors selling one or more species of edible insects were surveyed in the Vhembe district, Limpopo. These traders were from the towns of Thohoyandou (27), Tshakhuma (14), Sibasa (10), Musina (7), Louis Trichardt (6), Elim (6), and Biaba (2). The majority of traders were women (94%) between the ages of 18 to 74 years, while only 6% of traders were males between 35 and 65 years old (Table A1). Most traders (30%) were between 35 to 44 years old, followed by 45 to 54 years (22%), and the fewest traders (8%) were young people between the ages of 18 to 24 years (Supplementary File S1).
The educational background of traders ranged from no formal education to tertiary education, with the majority of traders (65%) having obtained secondary education, followed by primary education (22%), and the fewest (3%) traders having had tertiary education. The majority of traders (98%) were unemployed and made a living by selling edible insects, while only 2% of the traders were employed and selling insects part-time. In addition, 97% of the traders were breadwinners in their households (Table A1).
Of the traders, 42% only sold mopane worms, followed by traders that sold a combination of termites (13%), and traders that sold a combination of mopani worm and termites (10%). In contrast, fewer traders (2%) only sold Gynanisa caterpillars (Figure 1).
There were significant differences in the number of traders who sold mopane worms (X27= 23.996, p < 0.05), termite soldiers or workers (X27 = 60.484, p < 0.05), termite alates (X27 = 41.203, p < 0.05), and Gynanisa caterpillars (X27 = 15.707, p < 0.05) across towns, but there were no significant differences in the number of traders who sold stinkbugs (X27 = 22.242, p > 0.05) or grasshoppers (X27 = 6.105, p > 0.05).
Stinkbugs and grasshoppers were out of season and not seen in the markets during the survey. However, our analysis was based on the responses of traders who sell stinkbugs and grasshopper when they are in season. Of the traders, 94% bought insects from middlemen, with only 6% involved in insect harvesting from the wild.
Insect trading takes place in informal markets along the street, pavements, and on table stalls composed of cardboard and wood. The majority of trading stalls had no protection from the sun (Figure 2). Some traders were sitting down on pavements along roadsides. Safety and hygiene were the major issues of concern stated by the respondents in the Vhembe district. Informal markets were untidy with few garbage disposal units. There were no dedicated sanitation services for traders (including running water and toilets). The majority of the traders had no secure storage units in which to put their stock; as a result, several traders were forced to travel with their stock every day because of the high theft rate.
The retail price of edible insects per steel cup (200 g) varied (caterpillars: ZAR 30 (USD 1.85) per cup; termites: ZAR 20 (USD 1.23) per cup (see Figure 3)). Traders in the area usually buy a 5 kg bucket of the caterpillars costing ZAR 300 (USD 18.5) from the middleman, which generates ZAR 2000–3000 (USD 123–185) for the trader. In addition, a 50 kg sack of caterpillars costs ZAR 3000 (USD 185) and generates a total of ZAR 15,000 (USD 923). On the other hand, a 5 L bucket of termites costs ZAR 200 (USD 12.3) from the middleman and generates an income of ZAR 1500 (USD 92.3).
Of the traders, 45% indicated that unemployment was the primary reason for selling edible insects. The second (34%) primary reason for trading was the increased demand for edible insects by consumers, while 14% cited poverty. Few (1%) traders indicated that they sold insects because of their health benefits (Figure 4a).
Most traders (60%) cited that trading insects provided financial support, while 35% cited that they use money generated from trading insects to pay school fees and electricity, and buy household items. However, 5% mentioned that they do not benefit much from selling insects. Of the traders, 3% earned over ZAR 2000 (USD 123) per week in large towns, while only 1% of the traders earned over ZAR 2000 (USD 123) per week in small towns (Figure 4b).
Most traders (24%) cited that the decline in the availability of edible insects from the wild and insect spoilage (22%) were the major challenges associated with trading insects. Fewer traders (1%) cited safety and termite bites as challenges associated with trading insects (Figure 5).
A total of 36 policy documents from various governmental organizations in Limpopo were reviewed, and only 4 included edible insects in economic development strategies. Only the mopane worm was included in economic development strategies (Table 1). Interventions were aimed at providing infrastructure for processing, packaging, storage, etc.; however, only one plan provided a budget for this (Table 1).

4. Discussion

Edible-insect trading is an everyday activity that provides seasonal employment for unemployed communities in Vhembe district, particularly for females [12]. This study found that almost all the traders were women, and when men did trade, they were over 35 years of age. Insect trading is primarily female-driven in most countries in Africa [12,25,26,27]. These results indicate that women play an essential role in rural livelihoods, and they are the backbone of subsistence household food security. Women depend on edible insects to generate income, which reduces poverty and improves household food security [28,29,30]. Findings from the current study revealed that trading in insects provides earning opportunities for women in rural areas of Vhembe district in Limpopo province, South Africa. Similar findings were reported by Netshifhefhe et al. [12], who stated that trading in termites in Vhembe district, Limpopo Province created employment opportunities for women in this district. Similarly, Makhado et al. [7] reported that trading in insects provided earning opportunities in the Greater Giyani Municipality in Limpopo. Edible-insect trading creates opportunities for women to participate in economic development in rural areas, thus empowering them with income opportunities and improving their livelihoods [27,28,31]. This directly contributes to SDG 1, 2, and 5 of no poverty, zero hunger, and achieving gender equality and empowerment for all women and girls, respectively [27]. The National Development Plan of South Africa’s goal is to eradicate poverty and to reduce inequality by 2030. Therefore, expanding edible-insect markets can contribute to realizing this goal. Edible insects should be adopted as an economic development strategy to end poverty in developing countries and empower women by providing earning opportunities.
Edible insects are an important natural resource used as food and cash income in southern Africa [7,21,32]. Mopane worms were the most sold insects across towns in the Vhembe district. Mopane worms are a popular food source and a delicacy that is widely consumed in southern Africa [21,24]. The sale of mopane worms results in an income of approximately USD 39 million to 59 million per annum across South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Botswana [20,24]. Edible insects provide earning opportunities that play a crucial role in improving livelihoods and reducing poverty in rural areas [12,24,30]. The consumption and trading of edible insects are essential coping strategies contributing to household food security and nutrition [24].
Edible insects play an important role in sustaining rural livelihoods [16,32]. Harvesting and selling insects improve rural livelihoods by providing an income that is used for basic needs such as paying for school fees, food, and electricity bills [33,34]. Trading edible insects provides seasonal employment and creates earning opportunities in rural communities in Southern Africa [7,35]. Generated income from trading insects in Vhembe district, Limpopo is in the range of ZAR 100–200 per week to over ZAR 2000 per week. These findings are in line with those of Netshifhefhe et al. [12], who reported that the income from selling termites in Limpopo is, on average, ZAR 292 (USD 18) a day, ZAR 2395 (USD 147) a month, and ZAR 20400 (USD 1256) a year. On the other hand, in Namibia and Cameroon, income from selling insects was estimated to be USD 71–4800 per season [26,36]. Agea et al. [33] reported that traders said the income from selling insects had improved their standard of living [33].
South Africa remains one of the countries with the highest unemployment rate globally [37,38,39], and unemployment is a significant socioeconomic issue facing this country. According to Statistics South Africa [40], the unemployment rate in South Africa was estimated to be 30.1% in the first quarter of 2020, and approximately 7.1 million South African were unemployed in that quarter. Most of the unemployed population in South Africa is in rural areas [38]. The majority of the population in Limpopo live in rural areas, and this province is the third poorest province in South Africa, with 21.8% of the population living under poverty [40,41]. Unemployment and poverty are the primary reasons for trading insects in the Vhembe district. According to Makhado et al. [7], 82% of the respondents in 6 villages of the Greater Giyani Municipality, Limpopo are unemployed and dependent on woodlands natural resources such as edible insects, wild fruits and herbs, medicinal plants, and fuelwood for household nutrition and income generation. The unemployment rate in Limpopo was 49.9% in 2020; therefore, expanding and promoting the edible-insect business in this province would create job opportunities and reduce poverty [40].
Edible insects are a traditional food source that has been consumed in South Africa for centuries [42,43]. However, edible insects are still not included in food policies and legislation that govern the use of insects as food [44]. Edible insects are not regulated in terms of food safety and quality, even though they are widely consumed in Limpopo and in some parts of Mpumalanga, Gauteng, North West, and KwaZulu-Natal provinces [11,45,46]. Both the government and nongovernmental organizations are not doing enough to protect, promote, and encourage the culture of consuming insects in South Africa. Edible insects are seen as food for poor people, dirty, and undignified [47]. For example, edible insects are mostly (rarely anywhere else) sold in informal markets where selling conditions do not meet the food standards requirements approved by the Departments of Health; of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries; and Trade and Industry [44]. The informal markets where insects are sold have no proper sanitation (running water and toilets) and storage facilities and are fundamentally unhygienic and unsafe.
Little is done to improve the conditions where edible insects are sold, as indicated by our assessment of municipal development plans. Trading conditions are poor and unhygienic with no proper sanitation. This shows a lack of respect and human dignity, which is unconstitutional given Section 10 of the South African constitution: “Everyone has inherent dignity and the right to have their dignity respected and protected” (Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996). Important cultural practices should be celebrated and embraced by the government (in terms of Sections 30 and 31 of the Constitution), by offering support such as infrastructure, proper storage facilities, and funding to improve the trading conditions of edible insects. This would also ensure that food safety and hygienic practices are met. The personal circumstances and needs of the traders and their clients should be accorded the necessary dignity and respect.
Edible insects are rarely included in rural development strategies. Few governmental organisations included edible insects in rural development strategies in Limpopo. Therefore, resources and budget to develop and expand the edible insects sector are limited [48]. The lack of clear legislation and regulatory guidelines governing trading and insect use as food in South Africa might be the primary barrier that prevents local authorities from including edible insects in rural economic development plans [44]. In addition, the lack of legislation and regulatory guidelines that recognise and govern the edible insect sector as part of agricultural activity is concerning [49]. There are no clear guidelines on the use of insects as food in South Africa. There are no standards on the use of insects for human consumption [44]. Food laws, such as the Meat Safety Act (2000), and policies in South Africa do not include insects, and insects have not been tested and approved for human consumption [44]. This may be the reason for not including edible insects in economic development strategies. The National Biodiversity Economic Strategy [50] does not include developing insects in rural areas. In addition, this might be the major barrier preventing the expansion of the edible-insect food sector in South Africa and other parts of the world [51].
Governmental and local authorities are aware of the potential of edible insects in addressing food insecurity and poverty in South Africa. For example, the Integrated Development Plan 2020/2021 of the Greater Giyani local municipality recognised mopani worm trading as an important local economic development activity that contributes to livelihoods in this municipality. Furthermore, the Greater Giyani Municipality Local Economic Development Strategy of 2014–2016 had plans to establish a mopane worm processing centre to be used by traders to hygienically sell and store large quantities of mopani worms [52]. This municipality also wanted to expand the mopani worm value chain to neighbouring SADC countries. This initiative provides job opportunities to local people in Giyani, South Africa [52]. The local Musina municipality also wanted to establish a mopani worm production facility used for storing and processing mopani worms by local traders and harvesters [53]. The Greater Giyani and Musina local municipalities are moving in the right direction by including mopani worms in their local economic development strategies, but these strategies need to translate into implementation on the ground, which requires the allocation of a necessary budget. The focus should not be on mopani worms; other edible insects (for example, termites, stink bugs and grasshoppers) that are consumed in these municipalities should be prioritised. Other municipalities should also include edible insects in their local economic development strategies because they can create earning opportunities for rural communities.
The decline in availability of edible insects is the main challenge faced by traders in Vhembe district. Edible insects are collected in the wild, and their availability is affected by climate change, uncontrolled harvesting, and land use changes such as clearing of land and agriculture [44,46]. The decline in the availability of insects affects rural communities who depend on edible-insect trading for a living. As a result, edible insects could be farmed to ensure long-term availability and accessibility when the natural supply is limited [54,55]. Edible insects are successfully farmed in Thailand, Kenya, Uganda, Ghana, and Zimbabwe [51,56]. The Flying Food project in Kenya and Uganda are small-scale insect-farming projects that successful farmed edible crickets [57], while the Aspire Food Group project specializes in farming palm weevils in Ghana [58]. Mopane Worm Enterprises from Zimbabwe specializes in farming mopane worms [59]. These small-scale insect farms are good examples of successful insect farming that can be adopted in South Africa, thereby creating localised value chains. Farming edible insects reduces overharvesting pressure and ensures that edible insects contribute to rural development, job creation, and social wellbeing without putting pressure on the species in the wild. However, there must be clear legislation and regulatory frameworks governing the farming of edible insects to ensure that proper standards and guidelines are followed [49,51]. Insect farming in South Africa can provide training opportunities and skills that would empower rural communities.

5. Conclusions

Edible insects are a traditional food source that plays a vital role in rural food security. Traditional food primarily contributes to rural livelihood improvement as a source of income and nutrition. This study determined the socioeconomic benefits of trading insects in the Vhembe district, South Africa. Trading in edible insects is an economic activity that creates earning opportunities for unemployed people in rural areas, especially women. As a result, edible-insect trading plays an essential role in alleviating poverty for unemployed rural people in Vhembe district. Mopane worms were the most sold insect in various towns across the district. One respondent said that mopani worms are desired by the consumers and often attract customers to buy, which improves business for insect traders. Edible insects could generate income for many more people in rural areas. For example, in the Asia-Pacific region (Thailand, Cambodia, and China), edible-insect farming is well-established and plays an essential role in alleviating poverty in rural areas [60]. The market of edible insects in this region is expected to exceed USD 270 million by 2024 [60,61]. In addition, the global edible-insect market is projected to reach USD 4.63 billion by 2027 [62]. Therefore, edible insects should be included in food policies and prioritised as a nutritious food source that can improve food and nutrition security in South Africa. The associated education and awareness interventions are necessary to promote their use. Edible-insect trading can be adopted as a rural development and poverty eradication strategy to improve rural livelihoods and create job opportunities. However, traders should be provided with infrastructure and funding for insect farming as part of the rural development program to create job opportunities while empowering rural communities, thus contributing to food security. Edible-insect farming ensures the accessibility and growth of edible-insect markets in rural areas. In addition, this could provide stable earning opportunities for insect traders and farmers. Edible insects can generate revenue that can contribute to the rural economy, thereby reducing poverty in rural areas. Government officials should invest in expanding the sale of edible insects in the Vhembe district, because they play an important role in generating income for traders in this district.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/resources10120123/s1, File S1. Questionnaire to Source Information from Traders in Vhembe District, Limpopo.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.T.H., R.S. and T.C.M. methodology, Z.T.H. and T.C.M.; data collection, Z.T.H. and T.C.M.; data analysis, Z.T.H.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.T.H.; writing—review and editing, R.S., T.C.M. and Z.T.H.; supervision, R.S. and T.C.M.; funding acquisition, R.S. and T.C.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Sustainable and Healthy Food Systems (SHEFs) supported by the Wellcome Trust’s Our Planet, Our Health programme (grant number 205200/Z/16/Z), and the National Research Foundation (grant number MND200528525611).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study has been ethically reviewed and approved by the University of KwaZulu-Natal Human and Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee (approval number HSS/0125/019D). Permission to conduct research in various villages in all the local municipalities was obtained from community leaders.

Informed Consent Statement

All participants provided informed consent to participate in the study, and data were anonymised, treated confidentially, and stored securely.

Data Availability Statement

Data presented in this study are available in the tables, figures, and appendices of the current manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Sustainable and Healthy Food Systems (SHEFs) supported by the Wellcome Trust’s Our Planet, our Health programme (grant number, 205200/Z/16/Z) for funding the project. We would like to thank Alfred Munyai, Vhutshilo Muthavhini, for assisting with administering of questionnaires. We would also like to extend our gratitude to the Centre for Functional Diversity for funding the field trips to Limpopo.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

Table
Table A1. Demographic information of traders across towns in Vhembe district (n = 72).
Table A1. Demographic information of traders across towns in Vhembe district (n = 72).
DemographicsElimLouis TrichardtMusinaSibasaThohoyandouTshakhuma
Age category (years)
Under 18000000
18–24 years400020
25–34000133
35–44214276
45–54042154
55–64111561
65–74301040
75 years and above
Sex
Male101110
Female76782614
Level of education
No formal education100000
Primary education132190
Secondary education43661714
Tertiary education000200
Occupation
Unemployed000010
Self employed56882514
Pensioner300010
Employed000000
Student000000

References

  1. Kalaba, F.K.; Chirwa, P.W.; Prozesky, H. The contribution of indigenous fruit trees in sustaining rural livelihoods and conservation of natural resources. J. Hortic. For. 2009, 1, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kalaba, F.K. The Role of Indigenous Fruit Trees in Rural Livelihoods: The Case of Communities in the Mwekera Area, Copperbelt Province, Zambia. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Underutilized Plants for Food Security, Nutrition, Income and Sustainable Development (ISHS Acta Horticulturae 806), Arusha, Tanzania, 31 January 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Govender, L.; Pillay, K.; Siwela, M.; Modi, A.; Mabhaudhi, T. Food and nutrition insecurity in selected rural communities of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa—Linking human nutrition and agriculture. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Ofoegbu, C.; Chirwa, P.; Francis, J.; Babalola, F. Assessing vulnerability of rural communities to climate change: A review of implications for forest-based livelihoods in South Africa. Int. J. Clim. Chang. Strateg. Manag. 2017, 9, 374–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dovie, D.B.K.; Shackleton, C.M.; Witkowski, T.F. Direct-use values of woodland resources consumed and traded in a South African village Direct-use values of woodland resources consumed and traded in a South African village. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2010, 9, 269–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Twine, W.; Moshe, D.; Netshiluvhi, T.; Siphugu, V. Consumption and direct-use values of savanna bio-resources used by rural households in Mametja, a semi-arid area of Limpopo province, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2003, 99, 467–473. [Google Scholar]
  7. Makhado, R.A.; Maltitz, G.P.V.O.N.; Potgieter, M.J.; Wessels, D.C.J. Contribution of woodland products to rural livelihoods in the northeast of limpopo province, South Africa. S. Afr. Geogr. J. 2009, 6245, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sekonya, J.G.; Mcclure, N.J.; Wynberg, R.P. New pressures, old foodways: Governance and access to edible mopane caterpillars, Imbrasia (Gonimbrasia) belina, in the context of commercialization and environmental change in South Africa. Int. J. Commons 2020, 14, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Twine, W.; Saphugu, V.; Moshe, D. Harvesting of communal resources by outsiders in rural South Africa: A case of xenophobia or a real threat to sustainability? Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2003, 10, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hlongwane, Z.T.; Slotow, R.; Munyai, T.C. Nutritional composition of edible insects consumed in africa: A systematic review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Teffo, L.S.; Toms, R.B.; Eloff, J.N. Preliminary data on the nutritional composition of the edible stink-bug, Encosternum delegorguei Spinola, consumed in Limpopo province, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2007, 103, 434–436. [Google Scholar]
  12. Netshifhefhe, S.R.; Kunjeku, E.C.; Duncan, F.D. Human uses and indigenous knowledge of edible termites in Vhembe District, Limpopo Province, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2018, 114, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Egan, B.A.; Toms, R.; Minter, L.R.; Addo-Bediako, A.; Masoko, P.; Mphosi, M.; Olivier, P.A.S. Nutritional significance of the edible insect, Hemijana variegata Rothschild (Lepidoptera: Eupterotidae), of the Blouberg region, Limpopo, South Africa. Afr. Entomol. 2014, 22, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sogari, G.; Menozzi, D.; Mora, C. Exploring young foodies׳ knowledge and attitude regarding entomophagy: A qualitative study in Italy. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2017, 7, 16–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Raheem, D.; Carrascosa, C.; Oluwole, O.B.; Nieuwland, M.; Saraiva, A.; Millán, R.; Raposo, A. Traditional consumption of and rearing edible insects in Africa, Asia and Europe. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 59, 2169–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gahukar, R.T. Edible insects collected from forests for family livelihood and wellness of rural communities: A review. Glob. Food Sec. 2020, 25, 100348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wessels, D.; Mushongohade, M.; Potgeiter, M.; Gardiner, A.; Ghazoul, J.; Pearce, J.; Frost, P.J.; Kozanayi, W.; Gondo, T.; Kurebgaseka, N.; et al. The Domestication of Mopane Eorms (Imbrasia belina), Mopane Worm Enhancing Rural Livelihoods. In Mopane Tree Ecology and Management; Ghazoul, J., Ed.; Final Technical Report; Department for International Development: London, UK, 2006; pp. 1–119. [Google Scholar]
  18. Nonaka, K. Feasting on insects. Entomol. Res. 2009, 39, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Anankware, J.P.; Osekre, E.A.; Fening, K.; Obeng-Ofori, D. Insects as food and feed. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 32, 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Potgieter, M.J.; Makhado, R.; Potgieter, A. Mopane Worms; Department of Biodiversity, University of Limpopo: Limpopo, South Africa, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  21. Baiyegunhi, L.J.S.; Oppong, B.B.; Senyolo, M.G. Socio-economic factors influencing mopane worm (Imbrasia belina) harvesting in Limpopo Province, South AfricA. J. For. Res. 2016, 27, 443–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dube, S.; Dlamini, N.R.; Mafunga, A.; Mukai, M.; Dhlamini, Z. A survey on entomophagy prevalence in Zimbabwe. African J. Food Agric. Nutr. Dev. 2013, 13, 7242–7253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kelemu, S.; Niassy, S.; Torto, B.; Fiaboe, K.; Affognon, H.; Tonnang, H.; Maniania, N.K.; Ekesi, S. African edible insects for food and feed: Inventory, diversity, commonalities and contribution to food security. J. Insects Food Feed 2015, 1, 103–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Makhado, R.; Potgieter, M.; Timberlake, J.; Gumbo, D.; Makhado, R.; Potgieter, M.; Timberlake, J.; Gumbo, D. A review of the significance of mopane products to rural people’s livelihoods in southern Africa. Trans. R. Soc. S. Afr. 2014, 2, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dzerefos, C.M.; Witkowski, E.T.F.; Toms, R. Life-history traits of the edible stinkbug, Encosternum delegorguei (Hem., Tessaratomidae), a traditional food in southern Africa. J. Appl. Entomol. 2009, 133, 749–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Adeoye, O.T.; Alebiosu, B.I.; Akinyemi, O.D.; Adeniran, O.A. Socio economic analysis of forest edible insects species consumed and its role in the livelihood of people in Lagos state. J. Food Stud. 2014, 3, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Imathiu, S. Benefits and food safety concerns associated with consumption of edible insects. NFS J. 2020, 18, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shackleton, S.; Paumgarten, F.; Kassa, H.; Husselman, M.; Zida, M. Opportunities for enhancing poor women’s socioeconomic empowerment in the value chains of three African non-timber forest products (NTFPs). Int. For. Rev. 2011, 13, 136–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Food and Argriculture Organization of the United Nations. Edible Insects. Future Prospects for Food and Feed Security; Food and Argriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  30. Van Huis, A. Edible insects are the future? Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2016, 75, 294–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Naughton, C.C.; Deubel, T.F.; Mihelcic, J.R. Household food security, economic empowerment, and the social capital of women’s shea butter production in Mali. Food Secur. 2017, 9, 773–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Baiyegunhi, L.J.S.; Oppong, B.B.; Senyolo, G.M. Mopane worm (Imbrasia belina) and rural household food security in Limpopo province, South Africa. Food Secur. 2016, 8, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Agea, J.; Biryomumaisho, D.; Buyinza, M.; Nabanoga, G.N. Commercialization of Ruspolia nitidula (nsenene grasshoppers) in Central Uganda. Afr. J. Food Agric. Nutr. Dev. 2008, 8, 319–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Gahukar, R.T. Entomophagy and human food security. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2011, 31, 129–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Thomas, B. Sustainable harvesting and trading of mopane worms (Imbrasia belina) in Northern Namibia: An experience from the Uukwaluudhi area. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 2013, 70, 494–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Muafor, F.J.; Le Gall, P.; Levang, P. Exploitation and Trade of the Palm Weevil in Cameroon, Working Paper 178; Centre for International Forestry Reserch (CIFOR): Bogor, Indonesia, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Harmse, A.; Blaauw, P.; Schenck, R. Day labourers, unemployment and socio-economic development in South Africa. Urban Forum 2009, 20, 363–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Klasen, S.; Woolard, I. Surviving unemployment without state support: Unemployment and household formation in South Africa. J. Afr. Econ. 2009, 18, 1–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Davies, R.; Thurlow, J. Formal-informal economy linkages and unemployment in South Africa. S. Afr. J. Econ. 2010, 78, 437–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. StatsSA, Quarterly Labour Force Survey Q1 2021. Available online: https://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0211/Media%20release%20QLFS%20Q1%202021 (accessed on 21 February 2021).
  41. De Cock, N.; D’Haese, M.; Vink, N.; van Rooyen, C.J.; Staelens, L.; Schönfeldt, H.C.; D’Haese, L. Food security in rural areas of Limpopo province, South Africa. Food Secur. 2013, 5, 269–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Bodenheimer, F.S. Insects as Human Food. In Insects as Human Food; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1951; pp. 395–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Quin, P. Foods and Feeding Habits of the Pedi. Ph.D Thesis, University of the Witwaterstand, Johannesburg, South Africa, 1959. [Google Scholar]
  44. Niassy, S.; Ekesi, S.; Hendrik, S.L.; Haller-Barker, A. Legislation for the Use of Insects as Food and Feed in the South African Context. In Edible Insects in Sustainable Food Systems; Halloran, A., Flore, R., Vantomme, P., Roos, N., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 1–479. [Google Scholar]
  45. Shackleton, S.E.; Shackleton, C.M.; Netshiluvhi, T.R.; Geach, B.S.; Ballance, A.; Fairbanks, D.H.K. Use patterns and value of savanna resources in three rural villages in South Africa. Econ. Bot. 2002, 56, 130–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hlongwane, Z.T.; Slotow, R.; Munyai, T.C. Indigenous knowledge about consumption of edible insects in South Africa. Insects 2021, 12, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Egan, B.A. Culturally and Economically Significant Insects in the Blouberg Region, Limpopo Province, South Africa. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  48. Shackleton, C.M.; Pandey, A.K. Positioning non-timber forest products on the development agenda. For. Policy Econ. 2014, 38, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Selaledi, L.; Hassan, Z.; Manyelo, T.; Mabelebele, M. Insects’ production, consumption, policy, and sustainability: What have we learned from the indigenous knowledge systems? Insects 2021, 12, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Department of Environmental Affairs. National Biodiversity Economy Strategy; Department of Environmental Affairs: Pretoria, South Africa, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  51. Halloran, A.; Vantomme, P.; Hanboonsong, Y.; Ekesi, S. Regulating edible insects: The challenge of addressing food security, nature conservation, and the erosion of traditional food culture. Food Secur. 2015, 7, 739–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Greater Giyani Local Municipality Led Strategy, 2014–2016. Available online: http://www.greatergiyani.gov.za/documents/led.php (accessed on 10 February 2021).
  53. Musina Local Local Economic Development Strategy 2014–2016. Available online: https://www.musina.gov.za/official-documents/led/ (accessed on 12 February 2021).
  54. Stull, V.J.; Wamulume, M.; Mwalukanga, M.I.; Banda, A.; Bergmans, R.S.; Bell, M.M. We like insects here’: Entomophagy and society in a Zambian village. Agric. Hum. Values 2018, 35, 867–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Stull, V.J.; Patz, J. Research and policy priorities for edible insects. Sustain. Sci. 2020, 15, 633–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Musundire, R.; Ngonyama, D.; Chemura, A.; Ngadze, R.T.; Jackson, J.; Matanda, M.J.; Tarakini, T.; Langton, M.; Chiwona-Karltun, L. Stewardship of wild and farmed edible insects as food and feed in Sub-Saharan Africa: A perspective. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Flying Food Project. Available online: https://www.flyingfoodproject.com/our-project/ (accessed on 16 February 2021).
  58. Aspire Food Group 2016. Available online: https://aspirefg.com/about-us.aspx (accessed on 16 February 2021).
  59. Payne, C.L.R.; Van Itterbeeck, J. Ecosystem services from edible insects in agricultural systems: A review. Insects 2017, 8, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Guiné, R.P.; Correia, P.; Coelho, C.; Costa, C.A. The role of edible insects to mitigate challenges for sustainability. Open Agric. 2021, 6, 24–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Baiano, A. Edible insects: An overview on nutritional characteristics, safety, farming, production technologies, regulatory framework, and socio-economic and ethical implications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 100, 35–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Stockdill, R. Massive Growth Projected for Edible Insects Market. Available online: https://insidefmcg.com.au/2020/12/18/massive-growth-projected-for-edible-insect-market/ (accessed on 10 November 2021).
Resources 10 00123 g001 550
Figure 1. Edible insects sold in various towns of the Vhembe district, Limpopo province, South Africa (n = 72). All species refers to mopani worms, termite soldiers or workers and alates, Gynanisa caterpillars, grasshoppers, and stinkbugs.
Figure 1. Edible insects sold in various towns of the Vhembe district, Limpopo province, South Africa (n = 72). All species refers to mopani worms, termite soldiers or workers and alates, Gynanisa caterpillars, grasshoppers, and stinkbugs.
Resources 10 00123 g001
Resources 10 00123 g002 550
Figure 2. Conditions of informal markets where edible insects are sold in the towns of Vhembe district, South Africa: (a) Thohoyandou, (b) Makhado, (c) Elim, and (d) Sibasa.
Figure 2. Conditions of informal markets where edible insects are sold in the towns of Vhembe district, South Africa: (a) Thohoyandou, (b) Makhado, (c) Elim, and (d) Sibasa.
Resources 10 00123 g002
Resources 10 00123 g003 550
Figure 3. Steel cup (200 g) used to measure single serving of insects, in this case, termites.
Figure 3. Steel cup (200 g) used to measure single serving of insects, in this case, termites.
Resources 10 00123 g003
Resources 10 00123 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Reason for trading insects and (b) weekly profit generated by traders from selling edible insects across small towns (i.e., Elim, Sibasa, Tshakuma, Biaba and Halambani) and large towns (i.e., Thohoyandou, Makhado and Musina) in Vhembe district (n = 72 traders).
Figure 4. (a) Reason for trading insects and (b) weekly profit generated by traders from selling edible insects across small towns (i.e., Elim, Sibasa, Tshakuma, Biaba and Halambani) and large towns (i.e., Thohoyandou, Makhado and Musina) in Vhembe district (n = 72 traders).
Resources 10 00123 g004
Resources 10 00123 g005 550
Figure 5. Challenges associated with trading in insects in Vhembe district, Limpopo.
Figure 5. Challenges associated with trading in insects in Vhembe district, Limpopo.
Resources 10 00123 g005
Table
Table 1. Policy documents that included edible insects in economic development strategies in various governmental organisations in Limpopo province.
Table 1. Policy documents that included edible insects in economic development strategies in various governmental organisations in Limpopo province.
MunicipalityPolicy DocumentYearEdible Insects IncludedAction/ExplanationBudget Allocation
Limpopo (Economic Development Agency)Strategic plan2020–2025NoneNo action
Limpopo (Provincial treasury)Strategic plan2020–2025NoneNo action
Vhembe district MunicipalityIDP2020–2021NoneNo action
Musina local municipalityIDP2020–2021NoneNo action
Musina local MunicipalityIDP2015–2016Mopani wormNo action
Musina local MunicipalityIDP2013–2014Mopani wormNo Action
Musina local MunicipalityLED2018Mopani wormPlanned to establish mopani worm production facility for processing and packaging of mopani worm
Collins Chabane local MunicipalityIDP2017–2018NoneNo action
Collins Chabane local MunicipalityIDP2018–2019NoneNo action
Collins Chabane local MunicipalityIDP2019–2020NoneNo action
Collins Chabane local MunicipalityIDP2020–2021NoneNo action
Thulamela local MunicipalityIDP2020–2021NoneNo action
Makhado local MunicipalityLED2013NoneNo action
Mopani District MunicipalityIDP2016–2021NoneRecognises mopani worm as an important economic activity in the district
Mopani District MunicipalityIDP2006–2012NoneNo action
Greater Giyani local MunicipalityIDP2020Mopani wormThe municipality recognizes mopani worms trading as an important economic activity. Dzumeri Processing centre used by insect traders and harvesters to process, store and trade mopani worm
Greater Giyani local MunicipalityLED2014–2016Mopani wormGreater Giyani Natural Resource program aimed at expanding mopani worm business. The municipality proposed building a processing center used by local traders to store large quantities of mopani worms and expand mopani worm value chains to the neighboring SADC countries.R11.6 million ($801104.97)
Greater Tzaneen MunicipalityLED2018NoneNo action
Greater Tzaneen MunicipalityIDP2015–2016NoneNo action
Greater Tzaneen MunicipalityIDP2019–2020NoneNo action
Capricon District MunicipalityIDP2016–2021NoneNo action
Blouberg local MunicipalityIDP2015–2016NoneNo action
Blouberg local MunicipalityIDP2019–2020NoneNo action
Blouberg local MunicipalityIDP2018–2019NoneNo action
Blouberg local MunicipalityIDP2020–2021NoneNo action
Molemole local MunicipalityLED2012NoneNo action
Molemole local MunicipalityLED2019–2024NoneNo action
Lepelle-Nkumpi local MunicipalityIDP2015–2016NoneNo action
Lepelle-Nkumpi local MunicipalityIDP2016–2021NoneNo action
Lepelle-Nkumpi local MunicipalityIDP2017–2018NoneNo action
Lepelle-Nkumpi local MunicipalityIDP2015–2016NoneNo action
Lepelle-Nkumpi local MunicipalityIDP2020–2021NoneNo action
Lepelle-Nkumpi local MunicipalityLED2019NoneNo action
Aganang local MunicipalityLED2013NoneNo action
Aganang local MunicipalityIDP2009–2010NoneNo action
Polokwane local MunicipalityIDP2019–2020NoneNo action
Polokwane local MunicipalityIDP2021–2021NoneNo action
IDP, Integrated Development Plan; LED, Local Economic Development strategy. Makhado and Musina local municipalities fall under Vhembe District Municipality, and Blouberg under Capricorn District Municipality, and Greater Giyani and Greater Tzaneen under Mopani District Municipality.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hlongwane, Z.T.; Slotow, R.; Munyai, T.C. The Role of Edible Insects in Rural Livelihoods, and Identified Challenges in Vhembe District, Limpopo, South Africa. Resources 2021, 10, 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10120123

AMA Style

Hlongwane ZT, Slotow R, Munyai TC. The Role of Edible Insects in Rural Livelihoods, and Identified Challenges in Vhembe District, Limpopo, South Africa. Resources. 2021; 10(12):123. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10120123

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hlongwane, Zabentungwa T., Rob Slotow, and Thinandavha C. Munyai. 2021. "The Role of Edible Insects in Rural Livelihoods, and Identified Challenges in Vhembe District, Limpopo, South Africa" Resources 10, no. 12: 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10120123

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop