Non-Conscious vs. Deliberate Dynamic Decision-Making—A Pilot Experiment
AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to explore the effects of non-conscious vs. deliberate ways of making decisions in a dynamic decision-making task. An experimental setting is used to study this question; three experimental groups are distinguished: immediate decision-making (only very limited time for deliberate cognitive processing), considerate decision-making (relatively long time for deliberate cognitive processing), and distracted decision-making (time for non-conscious cognitive processing only). As experimental stimulus, a simulator based on the Kaibab Plateau model was employed. With a sample size of more than 100 experimental participants, group differences are not significant for most data examined. Implications comprise the formulation of a framework to guide further research. The value of this paper lies in the fact that it connects to a recent discussion in psychology and transfers it to a domain in the core interest of the system community: decision-making in situations with dynamic complexity. Furthermore, it offers a range of improvement points for potential follow-up studies. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Größler, A.; Rouwette, E.; Vennix, J. Non-Conscious vs. Deliberate Dynamic Decision-Making—A Pilot Experiment. Systems 2016, 4, 13.
Größler A, Rouwette E, Vennix J. Non-Conscious vs. Deliberate Dynamic Decision-Making—A Pilot Experiment. Systems. 2016; 4(1):13.Chicago/Turabian Style
Größler, Andreas; Rouwette, Etiënne; Vennix, Jac. 2016. "Non-Conscious vs. Deliberate Dynamic Decision-Making—A Pilot Experiment." Systems 4, no. 1: 13.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.