Next Article in Journal
Synthesis, Characterization and Dye Removal Behavior of Core–Shell–Shell Fe3O4/Ag/Polyoxometalates Ternary Nanocomposites
Previous Article in Journal
Nitrogen-Doped Porous Co3O4/Graphene Nanocomposite for Advanced Lithium-Ion Batteries
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 9
Issue 9
10.3390/nano9091254
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication of ZnO@Ag3PO4 Core-Shell Nanocomposite Arrays as Photoanodes and Their Photoelectric Properties

by
Zao Yi
1,†,
Xin Li
1,†,
Hui Wu
1,
Xifang Chen
1,
Hua Yang
2,
Yongjian Tang
1,
Yougen Yi
3,
Junqiao Wang
4 and
Pinghui Wu
5,*
1
Joint Laboratory for Extreme Conditions Matter Properties, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Processing and Recycling of Non-ferrous Metals, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China
3
College of Physics and Electronics, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
4
School of Physics and Engineering and Key Laboratory of Materials Physics of Ministry of Education of China, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
5
Research Center for Photonic Technology, Key Laboratory of Information Functional Material for Fujian Higher Education, Quanzhou Normal University, Fujian 362000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(9), 1254; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9091254
Submission received: 11 August 2019 / Revised: 25 August 2019 / Accepted: 30 August 2019 / Published: 3 September 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, we combine the methods of magnetron sputtering, hydrothermal growth, and stepwise deposition to prepare novel ZnO@Ag3PO4 core-shell nanocomposite arrays structure. Through scanning electron microscope (SEM) topography test, energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) element test and X-ray diffractometry (XRD) component test, we characterize the morphology, element distribution and structural characteristics of ZnO@Ag3PO4 core-shell nanocomposite arrays structure. At the same time, we test the samples for light reflectance, hydrophilicity and photoelectric performance. We find that after deposition of Ag3PO4 on ZnO nanorods, light reflectance decreases. As the time of depositions increases, light reflectance gradually decreases. After the deposition of Ag3PO4, the surface of the sample shows super hydrophilicity, which is beneficial for the photoelectric performance test. Through the optical transient response test, we find that the photo-generated current reaches a maximum when a small amount of Ag3PO4 is deposited. As the time of depositions of Ag3PO4 increases, the photogenerated current gradually decreases. Finally, we conducted an alternating current (AC) impedance test and also verified the correctness of the photocurrent test. Therefore, the structure is expected to be prepared into a photoanode for use in fields such as solar cells.

1. Introduction

ZnO is a new type of semiconductor material with a band gap of 3.37 eV and an exciton binding energy of 60 mV [1]. Due to its excellent thermal conductivity, chemical stability and strong UV absorption capacity, ZnO nanocomposite structure has great applications potential in sensors, detectors, solar cells [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. In recent years, due to the unique physical properties of low-dimensional ZnO, it has attracted widespread attention, especially in the field of photoelectric conversion. For example, ZnO one-dimensional nanorod arrays have superior optical properties and electron transport properties than ZnO thin films [15,16,17]. When ZnO nanomaterials are combined with other semiconductor materials, the formed heterojunction can effectively improve electron-hole pair separation ability and utilization of visible light, which is very important for the development of optical devices. Low-dimensional ZnO nanomaterials have a wide application in degradation of organic pollutants [18,19,20] due to their large specific surface area and more reactive sites. At present, methods for preparing ZnO nanomaterials include the hydrothermal method [21,22,23,24,25], the magnetron sputtering method [26,27,28,29], the chemical vapor deposition method [30,31,32,33], and electrochemical deposition [34,35,36]. In the process of actually preparing ZnO nanomaterials, the hydrothermal method stands out in various methods and has been widely used due to its advantages of no pollution and low cost.
Low-dimension nanomaterials like noble metal nanoparticles (NPs), carbon nanomaterials, and Ag3PO4 nanoparticles manifest many attractive properties, and they offer great potential applications for bioimaging, energy conversion, optoelectronic devices, wave absorption, and sensors [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. Among them, as a new type of indirect bandgap n-type semiconductor, Ag3PO4 has a forbidden band width of 2.45 eV and is capable of absorbing ultraviolet and visible light and its quantum yield is over 90%. The edge potentials of the Ag3PO4 conduction band (CB) and the valence band (VB) are 0.4 eV and 2.9 eV, respectively, and their VB potential is 2.6 eV lower than ZnO [51]. The extremely low valence band potential gives the photogenerated holes a strong oxidizing power. Due to the band gap and band potential of Ag3PO4, it exhibits excellent photooxidation capability, including degradation of organic dyes under visible light and the production of oxygen [52,53]. So far, Ag3PO4 crystal materials have been prepared in a variety of morphologies, such as diamond dodecahedrons, cubes and spheres. The method for preparing Ag3PO4 includes the following: Coprecipitation method [54], chemical bath deposition method [55], and the hydrothermal method [56]. However, the optoelectronic properties of pure Ag3PO4 may still be limited by its photo-generated charge separation/transport efficiency and limited light trapping capability. According to previous reports, the target semiconductor is combined with an appropriate metal [57] or semiconductor [58,59] to form a specific composite heterostructure, which can effectively control the energy band structure and surface charge distribution of the composite heterostructure, thereby improving the overall photoelectric performance of the material.
In this study, we prepare ZnO@Ag3PO4 core-shell nanocomposite arrays structure by way of the hydrothermal method and the stepwise deposition method. Firstly, the ZnO seed layer is prepared by magnetron sputtering on conductive glass (FTO), then ZnO nanorods are prepared by the hydrothermal growth method. Finally, Ag3PO4 is deposited on the surface of ZnO nanorods by the stepwise deposition method. The deposition of Ag3PO4 on the surface of ZnO nanorods changes the hydrophilicity of the surface. Compared with a single ZnO nanomaterial, we simply prepared the ZnO@Ag3PO4 nanocomposite structure by hydrothermal method and stepwise dipping method. The formed nanocomposite structure can more reduce the light reflection and enhance the separation of electron-hole pairs, which has practical significance for the production of photovoltaic devices. When an applied external bias is applied to the photoanode of ZnO@Ag3PO4, the photogenerated electron-hole pairs are separated and then is taken out to the external circuit by external bias. The deposition of a small amount of Ag3PO4 can maximize the photo-generated current, so the structure can be applied to photoelectric switches, photodetectors and other fields.

2. Experiment

2.1. Materials

Conductive glass (FTO); deionized water; ZnO target (purity 99.99%, the diameter of 60 mm, from Zhongnuo New Material (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China); hexamethylenetetramine (HMTA, from Tianjin Zhiyuan Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd, Tianjin, China); acetone (from Tianjin Zhiyuan Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd, Tianjin, China); zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, from Shanghai Titan Chemical Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China); silver nitrate (AgNO3, from Shanghai Sansi Reagent Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China); disodium phosphate (Na2HPO4, from Chengdu Cologne Chemical Co., Ltd, Chengdu, China); absolute ethanol(from Chengdu Kelon Chemical Reagent Factory, Chengdu, China); Na2SO4 solution (0.1 mol/L).

2.2. Cleaning the Conductive Glass (FTO) Substrate

The FTO conductive glass was first ultrasonically cleaned with absolute ethanol for 10 min, and then ultrasonically cleaned with acetone for 10 min. Finally, the FTO conductive glass was ultrasonically cleaned with deionized water for 10 min and then dried.

2.3. Preparation of ZnO Seed Layer

In order to successfully grow ZnO nanorods on the surface of FTO, we first use magnetron sputtering to deposit a layer of ZnO seed on the FTO surface. The experiment was carried out under the conditions of a pressure of 4 × 10−4 Pa, the argon gas flow rate of 40 sscm, then a radio frequency sputtering power of 60 W. We first pre-sputtered for 5 min and then officially sputtered each sample for 2 min. After the sputtering experiment was completed, the samples were taken out after cooling for 60 min.

2.4. Preparation of ZnO Nanorods Array

We used the hydrothermal method to grow ZnO nanorods on FTO with a deposited ZnO seed layer. In the experiment, we mixed hexamethyltetramine and zinc nitrate hexahydrate in a ratio of 1:1 as a precursor solution. The concentration of the solution was 40 mmol/L, the reaction temperature was 95 °C, and the reaction time was 4 h. After the reaction time was completed, we took the sample and washed it with deionized water for 3 times, then allowed it to dry naturally.
The reaction in the solution system was supposed to be as follows:
( C H 2 ) 6 N 4 + H 2 O → H C H O + N H 3 ⋅ H 2 O
N H 3 ⋅ H 2 O → N H 4 + + O H −
Z n ( N O 3 ) 2 + 2 N H 4 O H → Z n ( O H ) 2 ↓ + 2 N H 4 N O 3
Z n ( O H ) 2 + 4 N H 4 O H → Z n ( N H 3 ) 4 2 + + 2 O H − + 4 H 2 O
Z n ( N H 3 ) 4 2 + + O H − → Z n O ↓ + 4 N H 3 + H 2 O

2.5. Preparation of Ag3PO4 by Stepwise Dipping Method

In the experiment, we used the stepwise deposition method to prepare Ag3PO4 material. We used AgNO3 and Na2HPO4 solutions as deposition solutions. The concentration and volume of the deposition solution were 0.02 mol/L and 200 mL, respectively. During each deposition process, the deposited sample was placed in the AgNO3 solution for 30 min, then transferred to the Na2HPO4 solution for 5 min, and finally rinsed 3 times with deionized water. After the experiment was completed, all samples were taken out and naturally dried in a fume hood for use.

2.6. Annealing Experiment

The sample was placed in an annealing furnace and heated from room temperature at a rate of 4 degrees Celsius per minute. And after the temperature was raised to 140 degrees Celsius, maintained the temperature for 80 min. The next step was to stop the program, then waited for it to slowly drop to room temperature automatically, and last took out the sample.

2.7. Characterization

The surface structure and morphological characteristics of the composite samples were characterized using a scanning electron microscope (ULTRA 55, Zeiss, Heidenheim, Germany). The samples were analyzed by X-ray diffractometry (D/max-1400, Japanese Science, Tokyo Metropolis, Japan). The light-reflecting properties of the samples were characterized by a solid ultraviolet-visible-near-infrared spectrophotometer (UV-3150, Shimadzu, Shanghai, China). The test wavelength range was 185–3300 nm with a resolution of 0.1 nm. The hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties of the samples were analyzed by a contact angle tester (DSA30, Kruss, Hamburg, Germany). The test contact angle ranged from 0 to 180° with a resolution of ± 0.01°.

2.8. Optical Performance Test

In the experiment, we used a sample with an effective area of 1 cm2 on the working electrode. We used 0.1 mol/L Na2SO4 solution (pH = 7) as the electrolyte, the electrode with 0.5 mm diameter platinum wire and the reference electrode with saturated calomel electrode (SCE). Finally we let the light source enter from the back of the sample. When testing the photo-generated current, we set the bias voltage to 0.3 V, the sampling time to 400 s, and the sampling interval to 40 s. When testing the alternating current impedance, we set the bias voltage to 0 and the frequency range was 10−2–105 Hz.

3. Results and Discussions

The hexamethylenetetramine in the solution is first hydrolyzed to form NH3.H2O. OH− and Zn2+ form precipitated Zn(OH)2, the precipitate dissolves under the action of OH−, and finally forms ZnO through the action of OH− [15,16,17]. The formed ZnO finally forms ZnO nanorods along the ZnO seed layer on the FTO substrate. In the process of depositing Ag3PO4, the sample is first placed in AgNO3 solution to fully absorb Ag+ on the surface of the sample. In the Na2HPO4 solution, Ag+ and PO43− ions are combined to form Ag3PO4 precipitate deposit on the surface of ZnO nanorods.
In Figure 1, (A,B) are SEM images of FTO + ZnO nanorods. We can observe the large-area growth of ZnO nanorods and there is no connection between the nanorods. Figure 2 SEM images are FTO+ ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (1 deposition, 3 depositions, 5 depositions, 7 depositions), corresponding to (A–D), respectively. It can be seen that under the condition of 1 deposition, a small amount of Ag3PO4 adhere to the surface of the nanorods from the Figure 2. As the increase of deposition times, it is observed that the amount of the Ag3PO4 is large and it grows into noticeable blocks. When the deposition time is 7 times, the amount of Ag3PO4 covers the nanorods almost completely forming large aggregates.
In Figure 3, 1#, 2#, 3#, 4# correspond to FTO + ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (1 deposition, 3 depositions, 5 depositions, 7 depositions). Under the hydrothermal method used the ZnO nanorods begin to grow on the seed substrate along the C axis. After deposition of Ag3PO4 on the surface of ZnO nanorods, lattice shrinkage is caused. The more the amount of deposited Ag3PO4, the more obvious the lattice shrinkage causes the diffraction peak to shift to a high angle. The diffraction peaks appearing in ZnO are present at diffraction angles of 31.75°, 34.39°, 47.50°, 62.80°, corresponding to its crystal plane (100), (002), (102), (103). The peak of the (002) crystal orientation is the strongest, indicating that ZnO grows preferentially along the (002) crystal plane. The Ag3PO4 characteristic peaks correspond to (110), (200), (210), (310), (322), (320), (321), (421), respectively [60,61]. As the increase of deposition times, the characteristic diffraction peak of the Ag3PO4 gradually increases. By comparing each diffraction peak of the Ag3PO4, it can be seen that Ag3PO4 grows uniformly in all directions.
Figure 4 shows the UV-visible reflectance spectrum of the sample. We observed a higher reflectivity of ZnO nanorods in the visible range. After deposition of Ag3PO4, the reflectance in the visible light band gradually decreases. Since ZnO nanorods have strong light absorption in the ultraviolet light band [62], we can see from Figure 4 that the light reflectance in the 220 nm–380 nm band is almost 0. From Figure 4, we can observe that as the increase of deposition times of the Ag3PO4, the light reflection gradually decreases. When Ag3PO4 is deposited 7 times, the light reflection of ZnO nanorods is minimized. Since Ag3PO4 can effectively capture visible light and ultraviolet light of less than 530 nm, the light reflectance decreases rapidly around the 500 nm optical band. In general, the deposition of Ag3PO4 on the surface of ZnO nanorods can effectively reduce the reflection of light.
Figure 5 shows the hydrophilicity of the sample. We observe that when only ZnO nanorods are grown on FTO conductive glass, the contact angle is about 13°. This is because ZnO itself is a polar molecule and has certain hydrophilic properties. After depositing Ag3PO4, the contact angle is always 0° no matter how many times it is deposited. Since ZnO is a polar molecule as a metal oxide, Ag3PO4 is a metal inorganic salt and is also a substance having a polar structure. Polar molecules are charged due to internal imbalance, so the two are highly affinitive with polar water due to mutual electrostatic attraction. Therefore the static contact angle is always 0°. The sample is completely hydrophilic so that it is sufficiently in contact with the solution.
Figure 6 shows a schematic diagram of the photocurrent generated by the ZnO@Ag3PO4 heterojunction under illumination. When ZnO nanorods and Ag3PO4 are in contact with each other, a heterojunction is formed. After the bias is applied, an energy band structure as shown in Figure 6 is formed. When light illuminates two materials, the electrons in the valence band of the two materials will transition to the conduction band. In addition, it will leave holes in the valence band. Under the applied bias voltage, the electrons flow to the conduction band of Ag3PO4 and flow out through the external Pt electrode. The holes migrate from the Ag3PO4 valence band to the ZnO valence band and are transported to the external circuit through the FTO conductive glass together with the holes on the ZnO valence band.
Figure 7 shows the transient photoresponse current under dark/visible light cycling conditions over time with a fixed bias voltage of 0.3 V. Five repeated cycles show that the photocurrent decreases with time during the illumination process and eventually stabilizes, which is related to the stability of the sample. As shown in Figure 7, the current of each sample under illumination conditions is greater than that under dark conditions. Because the electrons on the valence band of Ag3PO4 and ZnO cannot obtain sufficient energy in the dark condition, they cannot transit into the conduction band, and no photogenerated carrier is generated, and transient photocurrent cannot be formed.
In addition, we also observe that the value of the photocurrent of Ag3PO4 deposited on the surface of ZnO first increases and then decreases. When Ag3PO4 is deposited once, the photocurrent value reach 1.3 mA/cm2. After a continuous photoresponse test, the photocurrent value is stable at around 1.0 mA/cm2. The photocurrent value decrease with the increase of the time of Ag3PO4 deposited on the surface. When Ag3PO4 is deposited 7 times, the photocurrent value dropped to about 0.4 mA/cm2. When there is only ZnO material, the light illuminates the sample and the electrons receive sufficient energy to transition to the conduction band. Because of the single material, the electron-hole pair recombination efficiency is very high, and the electrons in the conduction band release energy back into the valence band and recombine with the holes in the valence band [63,64,65]. After depositing a small amount of Ag3PO4 on the surface of ZnO, Ag3PO4 material can also effectively absorb photons and improve the utilization of light. After the heterojunction is formed between ZnO and Ag3PO4, the recombination of electron-hole pairs can be effectively suppressed, and the electron-hole pairs migration can be enhanced to promote the enhancement of photocurrent [66,67]. As the time of surface deposition of Ag3PO4 increases, the increase in the number of surface Ag3PO4 leads to the increase of surface resistance, which ultimately reduces the photocurrent.
In order to better reveal the principle of photocurrent response, we conducted AC impedance test results as shown in Figure 8. We observe that when only ZnO nanorods are used, the impedance value is very high, and the impedance value is greatly reduced after the deposition of Ag3PO4 to form a heterojunction. As the time of depositions of Ag3PO4 increases, the impedance value also increases. Comparing Figure 7 and Figure 8, we observe that the impedance of the samples with only ZnO nanorods is higher than the impedance of the samples with multiple depositions of Ag3PO4, but the photocurrent value of the samples with only ZnO nanorods is higher than that of the samples with multiple depositions of Ag3PO4. Because a small amount of Ag3PO4 is deposited on the surface, the formation of a heterojunction between ZnO and Ag3PO4 can suppress the recombination of electron-hole pairs and accelerate the separation of electron-hole pairs, so that the photocurrent can be effectively enhanced by illumination. However, as the deposition of Ag3PO4 on the surface of ZnO nanorods increases, Ag3PO4 will cover the ZnO nanorods on a large surface, and the holes in the ZnO valence band will remain in the ZnO material. As the number of holes trapped in the ZnO nanorods increases, the photocurrent formed is weakened and the ZnO nanorods are also corroded. For samples with only ZnO nanorods, this is not the case. Therefore, we can obtain the best photoelectric performance of Ag3PO4 deposited on the surface of ZnO nanorods once.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we successfully prepared ZnO@Ag3PO4 core-shell nanocomposite arrays structure by the hydrothermal method and the stepwise deposition method. The morphology, structure and elements of the material were analyzed by SEM, XRD and EDS. Light reflection indicates that deposition of Ag3PO4 on the surface of ZnO nanorods can effectively reduce the reflection of light. The deposition of Ag3PO4 can simultaneously make the surface of the material superhydrophilic. When the ZnO@Ag3PO4 core-shell nanocomposite arrays structure is used as a photoanode for photoelectric performance testing, through photocurrent response test, we find that depositing a small amount of Ag3PO4 on the surface of ZnO nanorods can enhance photocurrent. When Ag3PO4 is deposited once on the surface of ZnO nanorods, the transient photocurrent reached 1.3 mA/cm2, and the photocurrent was stabilized at 1.0 mA/cm2 after repeated cycles. Through the alternating current (AC) impedance analysis, we find that the ZnO@Ag3PO4 core-shell nanocomposite arrays have the lowest impedance when Ag3PO4 is deposited once on the surface of ZnO nanorods. Therefore, the ZnO@Ag3PO4 core-shell nanocomposite arrays structure can be applied to high-speed photoelectric switches, solar cells, sensors and other fields.

Author Contributions

Z.Y., X.L. conceived the idea of experiment; X.L. and Z.Y. performed the experiments; Z.Y., H.W., X.C., Y.T., H.Y., J.W., P.W., and Y.Y. discussed the results; Z.Y., X.L. wrote the manuscript; All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC), grant numbers 51606158, 11604311, 11875228, and 11704223; funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, grant number 2018J05008 and JZ160459; funded by Sichuan Science and Technology Program, grant number 2018GZ0521; Funded by PhD Research Startup Foundation of Quanzhou Normal University (G16057); and funded by the Distinguished Young Scholars Program of Fujian Province (C18032).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Farhat, O.F.; Halim, M.M.; Ahmed, N.M.; Oglat, A.A.; Abuelsamen, A.A.; Bououdina, M.; Qaeed, M.A. A study of the effects of aligned vertically growth time on ZnO nanorods deposited for the first time on Teflon substrate. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 426, 906–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, Z.L. Zinc oxide nanostructures: Growth, properties and applications. J. Phys. Condens. Mater. 2004, 16, R829–R858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Di, L.J.; Xian, T.; Sun, X.F.; Li, H.Q.; Zhou, Y.J.; Ma, J.; Yang, H. Facile preparation of CNT/Ag2S nanocomposites with improved visible and NIR light photocatalytic degradation activity and their catalytic mechanism. Micromachines 2019, 10, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yan, Y.X.; Yang, H.; Zhao, X.X.; Zhang, H.M.; Jiang, J.L. A hydrothermal route to the synthesis of CaTiO3 nanocuboids using P25 as the titanium source. J. Electron. Mater. 2018, 47, 3045–3050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, S.Y.; Yang, H.; Yi, Z.; Wang, X.X. Enhanced photocatalytic performance by hybridization of Bi2WO6 nanoparticles with honeycomb-like porous carbon skeleton. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 248, 109341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhao, X.X.; Yang, H.; Cui, Z.M.; Yi, Z.; Yu, H. Synergistically enhanced photocatalytic performance of Bi4Ti3O12 nanosheets by Au and Ag nanoparticles. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 13785–13796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Boscarino, S.; Filice, S.; Sciuto, A.; Libertino, S.; Scuderi, M.; Galati, C.; Scalese, S. Investigation of ZnO-decorated CNTs for UV Light Detection Applications. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, H.L.; Wang, G.Y.; Niu, J.B.; Wang, E.L.; Niu, G.; Xie, C.Q. Preparation of TiO2 nanotube arrays with efficient photocatalytic performance and super-hydrophilic properties utilizing anodized voltage method. Results Phys. 2019, 14, 102499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xiong, Z.; Cao, L. High magnetic-dielectric tunability in Ni nanocrystals embedded BaTiO3 films. J. Alloy. Compd. 2019, 785, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Malka, D.; Adler Berke, B.; Tischler, Y.; Zalevsky, Z. Improving Raman spectra of pure silicon using super-resolved method. J. Opt. 2019, 21, 075801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Malka, D.; Berkovic, G.; Hammer, Y.; Zalevsky, Z. Super-Resolved Raman Spectroscopy. Spectrosc. Lett. 2013, 46, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Su, M.; Xu, T.; Yang, H.; Bi, S.; Zhang, X.; Fang, Y.; Zhao, J. Design of Morphology-Controllable ZnO Nanorods/Nanopariticles Composite for Enhanced Performance of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zheng, Z.M.; Li, P.; Huang, J.; Liu, H.D.; Zao, Y.; Hu, Z.L.; Zhang, L.; Chen, H.X.; Wang, M.S.; Peng, D.L.; et al. High performance columnar-like Fe2O3@ carbon composite anode via yolk@shell structural design. J. Energy Chem. 2020, 41, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, X.X.; Zhu, J.K.; Tong, H.; Yang, X.D.; Wu, X.X.; Pang, Z.Y.; Yang, H.; Qi, Y.P. A theoretical study of a plasmonic sensor comprising a gold nano-disk array on gold film with an SiO2 spacer. Chin. Phys. B 2019, 28, 044201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yi, Z.; Luo, J.; Ye, X.; Yi, Y.; Huang, J.; Yi, Y.; Duan, T.; Zhang, W.; Tang, Y. Effect of synthesis conditions on the growth of various ZnO nanostructures and corresponding morphology-dependent photocatalytic activities. Superlattices Microstruct. 2016, 100, 907–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, X.; Chen, X.; Yi, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Tang, Y.; Yi, Y. Fabriction of ZnO Nanorods with Strong UV Absorption and Different Hydrophobicity on Foamed Nickel under Different Hydrothermal Conditions. Micromachines 2019, 10, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yi, Z.; Xu, X.; Kang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, S.; Yao, W.; Yi, Y.; Luo, J.; Wang, C.; Yi, Y.; et al. Fabrication of well-aligned ZnO@Ag nanorod arrays with effective charge transfer for surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 324, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, K.M.; Lai, C.W.; Ngai, K.S.; Juan, J.C. Recent developments of zinc oxide based photocatalyst in water treatment technology: A review. Water Res. 2016, 88, 428–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ong, C.B.; Ng, L.Y.; Mohammad, A.W. A review of ZnO nanoparticles as solar photocatalysts: Synthesis, mechanisms and applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 536–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pirhashemi, M.; Habibi-Yangjeh, A.; Rahim Pouran, S. Review on the criteria anticipated for the fabrication of highly efficient ZnO-based visible-light-driven photocatalysts. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2018, 62, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vernardou, D.; Kenanakis, G. Electrochemistry Studies of Hydrothermally Grown ZnO on 3D-Printed Graphene. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jeong, Y.J.; Balamurugan, C.; Lee, D.W. Enhanced CO2 gas-sensing performance of ZnO nanopowder by La loaded during simple hydrothermal method. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 229, 288–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hassanpour, A.; Bogdan, N.; Capobianco, J.A.; Bianucci, P. Hydrothermal selective growth of low aspect ratio isolated ZnO nanorods. Mater. Des. 2017, 119, 464–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tam, K.H.; Cheung, C.K.; Leung, Y.H.; Djurišić, A.B.; Ling, C.C.; Beling, C.D.; Fung, S.; Kwok, W.M.; Chan, W.K.; Phillips, D.L.; et al. Defects in ZnO Nanorods Prepared by a Hydrothermal Method. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 20865–20871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jiaqiang, X.; Yuping, C.; Yadong, L.; Jianian, S. Gas sensing properties of ZnO nanorods prepared by hydrothermal method. J. Mater. Sci. 2005, 40, 2919–2921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, W.; Liu, Z.; Peng, D.L.; Zhang, F.; Huang, H.; Xie, Y.; Wu, Z. Room-temperature deposition of transparent conducting Al-doped ZnO films by RF magnetron sputtering method. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 5669–5673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, M.W.; Liang, C.P.; Zhang, Y.B.; Yi, Z.; Chen, X.F.; Zhou, Z.G.; Yang, H.; Tang, Y.J.; Yi, Y.G. Terahertz wideband perfect absorber based on open loop with cross nested structure. Results Phys. 2019, 15, 102603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chin, H.S.; Chao, L.S.; Wu, C.C. Crystal, optical, and electrical characteristics of transparent conducting gallium-doped zinc oxide films deposited on flexible polyethylene naphthalate substrates using radio frequency magnetron sputtering. Mater. Res. Bull. 2016, 79, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wen, X.; He, Y.; Chen, C.; Liu, X.; Wang, L.; Yang, B.; Leng, M.; Song, H.; Zeng, K.; Li, D.; et al. Magnetron sputtered ZnO buffer layer for Sb2Se3 thin film solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2017, 172, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, J.; Tang, C.J.; Mao, P.; Peng, C.; Gao, D.P.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Q.G.; Zhang, L.B. Surface-plasmon-polaritons-assisted enhanced magnetic response at optical frequencies in metamaterials. IEEE Photonics J. 2016, 8, 4800107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Barreca, D.; Bekermann, D.; Comini, E.; Devi, A.; Fischer, R.A.; Gasparotto, A.; Maccato, C.; Sberveglieri, G.; Tondello, E. 1D ZnO nano-assemblies by Plasma-CVD as chemical sensors for flammable and toxic gases. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2010, 149, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ye, Z.; Wang, T.; Wu, S.; Ji, X.; Zhang, Q. Na-doped ZnO nanorods fabricated by chemical vapor deposition and their optoelectrical properties. J. Alloy. Compd. 2017, 690, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhan, Z.; Xu, L.; An, J.; Du, H.; Weng, Z.; Lu, W. Direct Catalyst-Free Chemical Vapor Deposition of ZnO Nanowire Array UV Photodetectors with Enhanced Photoresponse Speed. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2017, 19, 1700101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liang, C.P.; Yi, Z.; Chen, X.F.; Tang, Y.J.; Yi, Y.; Zhou, Z.G.; Wu, X.G.; Huang, Z.; Yi, Y.G.; Zhang, G.F. Dual-band infrared perfect absorber based on a Ag-dielectric-Ag multilayer films with nanoring grooves arrays. Plasmonics 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ren, X.; Zi, W.; Ma, Q.; Xiao, F.; Gao, F.; Hu, S.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, S. Topology and texture controlled ZnO thin film electrodeposition for superior solar cell efficiency. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2015, 134, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sarangi, S.N. Controllable growth of ZnO nanorods via electrodeposition technique: Towards UV photo-detection. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2016, 49, 355103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, H.L.; Niu, J.B.; Wang, G.Y. Dual-band, polarization-insensitive metamaterial perfect absorber based on monolayer graphene in the mid-infrared range. Results Phys. 2019, 13, 102313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yi, Z.; Liang, C.P.; Chen, X.F.; Zhou, Z.G.; Tang, Y.J.; Ye, X.; Yi, Y.G.; Wang, J.Q.; Wu, P.H. Dual-band plasmonic perfect absorber based on graphene metamaterials for refractive index sensing application. Micromachines 2019, 10, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Cen, C.L.; Zhang, Y.B.; Liang, C.P.; Chen, X.F.; Yi, Z.; Duan, T.; Tang, Y.J.; Ye, X.; Yi, Y.G.; Xiao, S.Y. Numerical investigation of a tunable dual-band metamaterial perfect absorber consisting of two-intersecting graphene nanorings arrays. Phys. Lett. A 2019, 383, 3030–3035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cen, C.L.; Yi, Z.; Zhang, G.F.; Zhang, Y.B.; Liang, C.P.; Chen, X.F.; Tang, Y.J.; Ye, X.; Yi, Y.G.; Wang, J.Q.; et al. Theoretical design of a triple-band perfect metamaterial absorber in the THz frequency range. Results Phys. 2019, 14, 102463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, Y.B.; Cen, C.L.; Liang, C.P.; Yi, Z.; Chen, X.F.; Li, M.W.; Zhou, Z.G.; Tang, Y.J.; Yi, Y.G.; Zhang, G.F. Dual-band switchable terahertz metamaterial absorber based on metal nanostructure. Results Phys. 2019, 14, 102422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, C.; Su, W.Q.; Wang, F.M.; Li, X.L.; Yang, L.; Sun, T.; Mu, H.W.; Chu, P.K. Theoretical assessment of a highly sensitive photonic crystal fibre based on surface plasmon resonance sensor operating in the near-infrared wavelength. J. Mod. Opt. 2019, 66, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, C.; Yang, L.; Lu, X.L.; Liu, Q.; Wang, F.M.; Lv, J.W.; Sun, T.; Mu, H.W.; Chu, P.K. Mid-infrared surface plasmon resonance sensor based on photonic crystal fibers. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 14227–14237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Liu, C.; Yang, L.; Liu, Q.; Wang, F.M.; Sun, Z.J.; Sun, T.; Mu, H.W.; Chu, P.K. Analysis of a Surface Plasmon Resonance Probe Based on Photonic Crystal Fibers for Low Refractive Index Detection. Plasmonics 2018, 13, 779–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, C.; Fu, G.L.; Wang, F.M.; Yi, Z.; Xu, C.H.; Yang, L.; Liu, Q.; Liu, W.; Li, X.L.; Mu, H.W.; et al. Ex-centric core photonic crystal fiber sensor with gold nanowires based on surface plasmon resonance. Optik 2019, 196, 163173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, C.; Wang, L.Y.; Yang, L.; Wang, F.M.; Xu, C.H.; Lv, J.W.; Fu, G.L.; Li, X.L.; Liu, Q.; Mu, H.W.; et al. The single-polarization filter composed of gold-coated photonic crystal fiber. Phys. Lett. A 2019, 383, 3200–3206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, X.X.; Zhu, J.K.; Wen, X.L.; Wu, X.X.; Wu, Y.; Su, Y.W.; Tong, H.; Qi, Y.P.; Yang, H. Wide range refractive index sensor based on a coupled structure of Au nanocubes and Au film. Opt. Mater. Express 2019, 9, 3079–3088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tong, H.; Xu, Y.Q.; Su, Y.W.; Wang, X.X. Theoretical study for fabricating elliptical subwavelength nanohole arrays by higher-order waveguide-mode interference. Results Phys. 2019, 14, 102460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, X.X.; Pang, Z.Y.; Yang, H.; Qi, Y.P. Theoretical study of subwavelength circular grating fabrication based on continuously exposed surface plasmon interference lithography. Results Phys. 2019, 14, 102446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, X.X.; Bai, X.L.; Pang, Z.Y.; Zhu, J.K.; Wu, Y.; Yang, H.; Qi, Y.P.; Wen, X.L. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering by composite structure of gold nanocube-PMMA-gold film. Opt. Mater. Express 2019, 9, 1872–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ty, J.T.D.; Yanagi, H. Electrochemical deposition of zinc oxide nanorods for hybrid solar cells. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 54, 04DK05. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dong, C.; Wu, K.L.; Li, M.R.; Liu, L.; Wei, X.W. Synthesis of Ag3PO4–ZnO nanorod composites with high visible-light photocatalytic activity. Catal. Commun. 2014, 46, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yi, Z.; Ye, J.; Kikugawa, N.; Kako, T.; Ouyang, S.; Stuart-Williams, H.; Yang, H.; Cao, J.; Luo, W.; Li, Z.; et al. An orthophosphate semiconductor with photooxidation properties under visible-light irradiation. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 559–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Gao, H.J.; Zheng, C.X.; Yang, H.; Niu, X.W.; Wang, S.F. Construction of a CQDs/Ag3PO4/BiPO4 heterostructure photocatalyst with enhanced photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B under simulated solar irradiation. Micromachines 2019, 10, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Liu, R.; Hu, P.; Chen, S. Photocatalytic activity of Ag3PO4 nanoparticle/TiO2 nanobelt heterostructures. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 9805–9809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gunjakar, J.L.; Jo, Y.K.; Kim, I.Y.; Lee, J.M.; Patil, S.B.; Pyun, J.C.; Hwang, S.J. A chemical bath deposition route to facet-controlled Ag3PO4 thin films with improved visible light photocatalytic activity. J. Solid State Chem. 2016, 240, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liu, Z.Q.; Tang, P.; Liu, X.S.; Yi, Z.; Liu, G.Q.; Wang, Y.; Liu, M.L. Truncated titanium/semiconductor cones for wide-band solar absorbers. Nanotechnology 2019, 30, 305203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chen, J.; Tang, P.; Liu, G.Q.; Yi, Z.; Liu, X.S.; Pan, P.P.; Liu, Z.Q. Si nano-cavity enabled SERS signal amplification. Nanotechnology 2019, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, G.; Liu, Y.; Tang, L.; Liu, X.; Fu, G.; Liu, Z. Semiconductor-enhanced Raman scattering sensors via quasi-three-dimensional Au/Si/Au structures. Nanophotonics 2019, 8, 1095–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Guo, J.; Zhou, H.; Ouyang, S.; Kako, T.; Ye, J. An Ag3PO4/nitridized Sr2Nb2O7 composite photocatalyst with adjustable band structures for efficient elimination of gaseous organic pollutants under visible light irradiation. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 7303–7311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. He, Z.X.; Li, M.M.; Li, Y.H.; Li, C.C.; Yi, Z.; Zhu, J.; Dai, L.; Meng, W.; Zhou, H.Z.; Wang, L. ZrO2 nanoparticle embedded carbon nanofibers by electrospinning technique as advanced negative electrode materials for vanadium redox flow battery. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 309, 166–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, Q.B.; Liao, J.; Liao, M.; Dai, J.Y.; Ge, H.L.; Duan, T.; Yao, W.T. One-dimensional Fe7S8@C nanorods as anode materials for high-rate and long-life lithium-ion batteries. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 473, 799–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chen, X.F.; Cen, C.L.; Zhou, L.; Cao, R.F.; Yi, Z.; Tang, Y.J. Magnetic properties and reverse magnetization process of anisotropic nanocomposite permanent magnet. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 483, 152–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liu, G.; Chen, J.; Pan, P.; Liu, Z. Hybrid Metal-Semiconductor Meta-Surface Based Photo-Electronic Perfect Absorber. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2019, 25, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Shi, D.; Xiong, Z.; Li, J.; Luo, B.; Fang, L.; Xia, Y.; Gao, Z. Electron transition and electron-hole recombination processes in epitaxial BaTiO3 films with embedded Co nanocrystals. Mater. Res. Express 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yi, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Wu, H.; Chen, X.F.; Fan, Y.X.; Yang, H.; Tang, Y.J.; Yi, Y.G.; Wang, J.Q.; Wu, P.H. Synthesis, surface properties, crystal structure and dye-sensitized solar cell performance of TiO2 nanotube arrays anodized under different parameters. Results Phys. 2019, 15, 102609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yan, Y.X.; Yang, H.; Yi, Z.; Xian, T.; Wang, X.X. Direct Z-scheme CaTiO3@BiOBr composite photocatalysts with enhanced photodegradation of dyes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nanomaterials 09 01254 g001 550
Figure 1. SEM image of ZnO nanorods at low magnification (A) and high magnification (B) viewing angles.
Figure 1. SEM image of ZnO nanorods at low magnification (A) and high magnification (B) viewing angles.
Nanomaterials 09 01254 g001
Nanomaterials 09 01254 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM images of ZnO nanorods+Ag3PO4: (A) Ag3PO4 deposition once, (B) Ag3PO4 deposition three times, (C) Ag3PO4 deposition five times, (D) Ag3PO4 deposition seven times.
Figure 2. SEM images of ZnO nanorods+Ag3PO4: (A) Ag3PO4 deposition once, (B) Ag3PO4 deposition three times, (C) Ag3PO4 deposition five times, (D) Ag3PO4 deposition seven times.
Nanomaterials 09 01254 g002
Nanomaterials 09 01254 g003 550
Figure 3. XRD pattern of ZnO nanorods+Ag3PO4: (1#) Ag3PO4 deposition once. (2#) Ag3PO4 deposition three times. (3#) Ag3PO4 deposition five times. (4#) Ag3PO4 deposition seven times.
Figure 3. XRD pattern of ZnO nanorods+Ag3PO4: (1#) Ag3PO4 deposition once. (2#) Ag3PO4 deposition three times. (3#) Ag3PO4 deposition five times. (4#) Ag3PO4 deposition seven times.
Nanomaterials 09 01254 g003
Nanomaterials 09 01254 g004 550
Figure 4. UV-visible reflectance of the sample: (1#) ZnO nanorods. (2#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (1 deposition). (3#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (3 depositions). (4#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (5 depositions). (5#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (7 depositions).
Figure 4. UV-visible reflectance of the sample: (1#) ZnO nanorods. (2#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (1 deposition). (3#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (3 depositions). (4#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (5 depositions). (5#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (7 depositions).
Nanomaterials 09 01254 g004
Nanomaterials 09 01254 g005 550
Figure 5. Static contact angle of the sample: (1#) ZnO nanorods. (2#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (1 deposition). (3#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (3 depositions). (4#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (5 depositions). (5#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (7 depositions).
Figure 5. Static contact angle of the sample: (1#) ZnO nanorods. (2#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (1 deposition). (3#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (3 depositions). (4#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (5 depositions). (5#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (7 depositions).
Nanomaterials 09 01254 g005
Nanomaterials 09 01254 g006 550
Figure 6. Schematic representation of the ZnO@Ag3PO4 heterojunction.
Figure 6. Schematic representation of the ZnO@Ag3PO4 heterojunction.
Nanomaterials 09 01254 g006
Nanomaterials 09 01254 g007 550
Figure 7. The i-t curve of the sample was prepared in a 0.1 M Na2SO4 (pH = 7) electrolyte under the action of a constant potential of 0.3 V vs. SCE: (1#) ZnO nanorods. (2#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (1 deposition). (3#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (3 depositions). (4#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (5 depositions). (5#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (7 depositions).
Figure 7. The i-t curve of the sample was prepared in a 0.1 M Na2SO4 (pH = 7) electrolyte under the action of a constant potential of 0.3 V vs. SCE: (1#) ZnO nanorods. (2#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (1 deposition). (3#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (3 depositions). (4#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (5 depositions). (5#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (7 depositions).
Nanomaterials 09 01254 g007
Nanomaterials 09 01254 g008 550
Figure 8. Nyquist diagram of the samples under visible light illumination: (1#) ZnO nanorods. (2#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (1 deposition). (3#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (3 depositions). (4#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (5 depositions). (5#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (7 depositions).
Figure 8. Nyquist diagram of the samples under visible light illumination: (1#) ZnO nanorods. (2#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (1 deposition). (3#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (3 depositions). (4#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (5 depositions). (5#) ZnO nanorods + Ag3PO4 (7 depositions).
Nanomaterials 09 01254 g008

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yi, Z.; Li, X.; Wu, H.; Chen, X.; Yang, H.; Tang, Y.; Yi, Y.; Wang, J.; Wu, P. Fabrication of ZnO@Ag3PO4 Core-Shell Nanocomposite Arrays as Photoanodes and Their Photoelectric Properties. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1254. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9091254

AMA Style

Yi Z, Li X, Wu H, Chen X, Yang H, Tang Y, Yi Y, Wang J, Wu P. Fabrication of ZnO@Ag3PO4 Core-Shell Nanocomposite Arrays as Photoanodes and Their Photoelectric Properties. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(9):1254. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9091254

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yi, Zao, Xin Li, Hui Wu, Xifang Chen, Hua Yang, Yongjian Tang, Yougen Yi, Junqiao Wang, and Pinghui Wu. 2019. "Fabrication of ZnO@Ag3PO4 Core-Shell Nanocomposite Arrays as Photoanodes and Their Photoelectric Properties" Nanomaterials 9, no. 9: 1254. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9091254

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop