Next Article in Journal
Silver Quantum Dot Decorated 2D-SnO2 Nanoflakes for Photocatalytic Degradation of the Water Pollutant Rhodamine B
Next Article in Special Issue
Numerical Analysis of the Correlation between Arc Plasma Fluctuation and Nanoparticle Growth–Transport under Atmospheric Pressure
Previous Article in Journal
Interface Interactions in Conjugated Polymer Composite with Metal Oxide Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Endohedral Fullerene Fe@C28 Adsorbed on Au(111) Surface as a High-Efficiency Spin Filter: A Theoretical Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Super Ductility of Nanoglass Aluminium Nitride

Nanomaterials 2019, 9(11), 1535; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9111535
by Yinbo Zhao 1, Xianghe Peng 1,*, Cheng Huang 1, Bo Yang 1, Ning Hu 1 and Mingchao Wang 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Nanomaterials 2019, 9(11), 1535; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9111535
Submission received: 25 September 2019 / Revised: 27 October 2019 / Accepted: 28 October 2019 / Published: 29 October 2019

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper by Yinbo Zhao et al.. entitled “Super Ductility of Nanoglass Aluminium Nitride” reports results of their results of computer simulation about the mechanical properties of nanoglass Aluminum Nitride (ng-AlN). They investigated the grain size, temperature, and strain-rate dependence of mechanical properties of ng-AlN precisely by visualizing the real-space image of the distribution of the strain and analyzing them to clarify the mechanism. Their presentation is clear, and sound based on the objective result. The referee recommends this paper should be published in “Nanomaterials”. But before the publication, the referee would like to suggest the authors improve the manuscript considering two points listed below,

1)   In l. 257 on page 13, The authors wrote, “We extend Eq. (5) to the dependence of …”. The referee cannot understand how to extend Eq. (5) in their analysis. Please clarify it.

2)   In Figure 13 (a), epsilon_2 appears in the graph and is emphasized by colorful backgrounds. However, the referee cannot find any description of epsilon_2 in the main text as well as the caption of this figure. Please describe epsilon_2.

Also, please clarify a rather minor point,

a)     Some abbreviation is used without definition. For example, “MG” in l. 48 and “NVE” in line 90 are used without definition.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The present study is about the mechanical properties of nanoglass aluminium nitrides with different sizes of glassy grains, which were subjected to uniaxial tension at different temperatures and strain rates.

Generally, the study is well conducted and written. However, there are some small remarks.

Computational Methods

There are different data names in the Legend for the Table 1. and in the Table 1.

Table 1. Mechanical properties of a-AlN and ng-AlNs obtained with the MD simulations. Notations: Ec (eV), cohesive energy; B (GPa), bulk modulus; Cij (GPa), elastic constant ...

But in the Table 1. the data are named as C11 (GPa) and C12 (GPa).

Results and discussion

Road 160: there are missing gaps: d=8nm, d=4nm.  It is not constant in the text: sometimes: d = 1 nm, 4 nm, and 8 nm (Road 138).

Road 158: misprint:could be ascribed

Road 163: the abbreviation STZs is not explained.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript is devoted to aluminium nitride AlN in the form of nanoglass. The authors analyzed its mechanical properties by molecular dynamics simulations, when the tested mateials represented different glassy grain sizes.

Comments

1. The authors should remove the wrong phrase: "... a member of the group III transition metal nitrides ..." and in this place insert: "... a member of nitrides with metals from IIIA group ...". Aluminium is not placed among the transition metals in the d segment in Periodic Table (groups 3-12 or IIIB-IIB).

2. At the end of Introduction traditionally should be inserted aim of the study expressed laconically. The aim should be answer on question: what for the research was undertaken, what a hypothesis wanted the authors to test?

The manuscript needs minor revision.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop