Next Article in Journal
Degradable Dextran Nanopolymer as a Carrier for Choline Kinase (ChoK) siRNA Cancer Therapy
Next Article in Special Issue
Toxicity Testing of Pristine and Aged Silver Nanoparticles in Real Wastewaters Using Bioluminescent Pseudomonas putida
Previous Article in Journal
Energy Transfer between Conjugated Colloidal Ga2O3 and CdSe/CdS Core/Shell Nanocrystals for White Light Emitting Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Organic Phase Change Nanoparticles for in-Product Labeling of Agrochemicals
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Nanomaterials 2016, 6(2), 33; doi:10.3390/nano6020033

EU Regulation of Nanobiocides: Challenges in Implementing the Biocidal Product Regulation (BPR)

1
Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Bülowsvej 17, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
2
Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, DTU-Building 113, DK-2800 Copenhagen, Denmark
These authors contributed equally to this work.
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Paul Bertsch and Jonathan Judy
Received: 9 October 2015 / Revised: 28 January 2016 / Accepted: 4 February 2016 / Published: 16 February 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Engineered Nanomaterials in the Environment)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [551 KB, uploaded 16 February 2016]   |  

Abstract

The Biocidal Products Regulation (BPR) contains several provisions for nanomaterials (NMs) and is the first regulation in the European Union to require specific testing and risk assessment for the NM form of a biocidal substance as a part of the information requirements. Ecotoxicological data are one of the pillars of the information requirements in the BPR, but there are currently no standard test guidelines for the ecotoxicity testing of NMs. The overall objective of this work was to investigate the implications of the introduction of nano-specific testing requirements in the BPR and to explore how these might be fulfilled in the case of copper oxide nanoparticles. While there is information and data available in the open literature that could be used to fulfill the BPR information requirements, most of the studies do not take the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s nanospecific test guidelines into consideration. This makes it difficult for companies as well as regulators to fulfill the BPR information requirements for nanomaterials. In order to enable a nanospecific risk assessment, best practices need to be developed regarding stock suspension preparation and characterization, exposure suspensions preparation, and for conducting ecotoxicological test. View Full-Text
Keywords: biocides; nanomaterials; European Union (EU) policy; regulation; risk assessment; ecotoxicity biocides; nanomaterials; European Union (EU) policy; regulation; risk assessment; ecotoxicity
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Brinch, A.; Hansen, S.F.; Hartmann, N.B.; Baun, A. EU Regulation of Nanobiocides: Challenges in Implementing the Biocidal Product Regulation (BPR). Nanomaterials 2016, 6, 33.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Nanomaterials EISSN 2079-4991 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top