Next Article in Journal
Synergistic Effect of ZIF-8 and Pt-Functionalized NiO/In2O3 Hollow Nanofibers for Highly Sensitive Detection of Formaldehyde
Previous Article in Journal
A Systematic Study of the Temperature Dependence of the Dielectric Function of GaSe Uniaxial Crystals from 27 to 300 K
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ethyl Cellulose-Core, OSA Starch-Shell Electrosprayed Microcapsules Enhance the Oxidative Stability of Loaded Fish Oil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Encapsulation of Tenebrio molitor Hydrolysate with DPP-IV Inhibitory Activity by Electrospraying and Spray-Drying

by
Carmen Berraquero-García
*,†,
Lydia Martínez-Sánchez
,
Emilia M. Guadix
and
Pedro J. García-Moreno
*
Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(10), 840; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14100840
Submission received: 15 March 2024 / Revised: 7 May 2024 / Accepted: 8 May 2024 / Published: 10 May 2024

Abstract

:
This study investigates the encapsulation of Tenebrio molitor hydrolysate exhibiting DPP-IV inhibitory activity by spray-drying and electrospraying techniques. First, we optimized the feed formulation and processing conditions required to obtain nano-microcapsules by electrospraying when using Arabic gum as an encapsulating agent and pullulan and Tween 20 as additives. The optimum formulation was also dried by spray-drying, where the removal of the additives was also assayed. Morphology analysis reveals that electrosprayed capsules have a smaller size (1.2 ± 0.5 µm vs. 12.4 ± 8.7 µm) and greater uniformity compared to those obtained by spray-drying. Regarding the surface nitrogen content and DPP-IV inhibitory activity, our results show no significant difference between the electrosprayed capsules and spray-dried capsules containing additives (IC50 of ~1.5 mg protein/mL). Therefore, it was concluded that adding additives during spray-drying allows for a similar encapsulation efficiency and reduced degradation during processing, as achieved by electrospraying technique but providing higher productivity. On the other hand, spray-dried capsules without additives displayed a higher surface nitrogen content percentage, which was mainly due to the absence of Tween 20 in the feed formulation. Consequently, these capsules presented a higher IC50 value (IC50 of 1.99 ± 0.03 mg protein/mL) due to the potential degradation of surface-exposed peptides.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

According to the International Diabetes Federation, 537 million people have diabetes, with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) being the most common, accounting for around 90% of all cases. This number is expected to increase to 643 million by 2030 [1]. T2DM is a metabolic disorder characterized by chronically high blood sugar levels due to insulin resistance and insufficient insulin secretion [2]. Insulin administration remains the primary treatment available; however, subcutaneous injection, which is undesirable for patients, is required as oral administration is impractical [3]. Hence, there is an increased interest in the development of alternative therapies. In particular, the inhibition of the enzyme dipeptidyl-peptidase IV (DPP-IV) has become a promising approach for controlling glycemic levels [4], leading to the development of oral antihyperglycemic drugs known as gliptins [5,6]. However, these drugs present significant risks [7], and increasing efforts have been focused on the use of bioactive peptides due to their potential to serve as antidiabetic agents without exhibiting side effects [8].
Bioactive peptides are mainly derived from the enzymatic hydrolysis of animal proteins (i.e., milk, fish, and others) [9,10,11]. Yet, the increasing the global population requires novel sustainable protein sources to meet higher demands while minimizing environmental effects [12]. Insects have emerged as a new sustainable protein source in recent years [13]. Particularly, Tenebrio molitor larvae (mealworms) have been recognized as a novel food by the European Food Safety Agency and are known for their high nutritional value in terms of protein and fat content [14,15], digestibility [16,17], and functional ability [18,19]. Additionally, several studies have highlighted the capacity of T. molitor to produce DPP-IV inhibitors through enzymatic hydrolysis [12,20].
The oral administration of bioactive peptides, for instance, in the form of functional food, is a simple and convenient approach for patients to counteract T2DM. However, biopeptides present some drawbacks that need to be addressed: high hygroscopicity leading to instability and decreased bioactivity [21], bitterness from hydrophobic amino acid residues [22], the low water solubility of highly hydrophobic peptides hindering incorporation into food formulation [23], physicochemical instability during storage and digestion [24], and limited bioaccessibility in the intestine [25]. A common strategy employed to overcome these drawbacks is the encapsulation of the protein hydrolysates/peptides used as food bioactive ingredients.
Encapsulation consists of the entrapment of the peptides within a matrix of one or more encapsulating agents [26]. Despite extensive research on the encapsulation of various substances such as lipids (e.g., omega-3 fatty acids) [27], vitamins [28], polyphenols [29], and other drugs [30,31], there have been relatively fewer studies conducted on the encapsulation of bioactive peptides. Furthermore, most of the research on encapsulating bioactive peptides has employed methods like coacervation, freeze-drying, and spray-drying [32]. While coacervation offers benefits such as high efficiency for flavorings and protection against oxidation at mild temperature conditions with potential for controlled release, it also has limited applications in the food industry due to its sensitivity to pH and ionic strength between the wall and core material [33]. Freeze drying can ensure physicochemical and bioactive stability but requires a significant amount of time–labor-cost resources compared to previous findings that favor spray-drying [34]. Spray-drying is widely used in the food industry for encapsulating bioactive components because of its versatility in terms of solvents and encapsulating agents, as well as its cost-effective benefits and high productivity [35]. This technique is based on the dehydration of finely atomized droplets due to their contact with a hot gas, such as air or, less commonly, an inert gas (e.g., nitrogen), resulting in dry particles [36,37]. The encapsulation of bioactive protein hydrolysates/peptides with antidiabetic activity by this technique has been investigated in various studies using diverse encapsulating agents, such as trehalose, mannitol and sorbitol [38], and maltodextrin combined with gum Arabic [39] and with agar and carrageenan [40]. Nevertheless, the digestion of trehalose and maltodextrin releases glucose, which is not desirable when producing functional food with antidiabetic activity, and carrageenan has been linked to glucose intolerance [41,42]; thus, alternative encapsulating agents should be used instead. In this regard, Arabic gum is a polysaccharide that is frequently used as an encapsulating agent due to its high solubility in water, leading to a low viscous solution, as well as its stabilizing and emulsifying properties [43]. Furthermore, Arabic gum does not provide glucose during digestion as it is not mostly digestible, making it suitable for encapsulating antidiabetic peptides [44]. In addition, studies have shown that Arabic gum may lower blood glucose levels by inhibiting the absorption of glucose in the intestine [45].
On the other hand, electrospraying is an alternative drying technique [46] consisting in the application of a high-voltage electric field between the tip of a needle and a grounded collector to induce the ejection of the solution. Upon reaching a high electrostatic field, the meniscus interface polarizes and forms a conical shape known as a Taylor cone. With increasing voltage, the electric force overcomes the surface tension, and a jet is released towards the collector [47]. Under sufficiently low solution viscoelasticity conditions, the jet destabilizes to form small, charged droplets that disperse due to electrostatic forces [48]. Meanwhile, solvent evaporation occurs in the travel of the droplets to the collector, leading to the obtaining of nano-microcapsules in powdered form [49]. Although this method has been previously used for the encapsulation of diverse bioactive protein hydrolysates/peptides [50,51], to the best of our knowledge, there are no previous studies on the encapsulation of peptides exhibiting antidiabetic activity.
Therefore, this study aimed to investigate encapsulation by electrospraying a Tenebrio molitor protein hydrolysate containing bioactive peptides which exhibit antidiabetic activity. For the sake of comparison between encapsulation technologies, the encapsulation of the hydrolysate by spray-drying was also evaluated. Thus, this work specifically examines the efficacy of electrospraying and spray-drying techniques in protecting these bioactive peptides. Initially, the formulation of the feed solution was optimized to obtain a stable electrospraying process and encapsulates with adequate morphology. Subsequently, encapsulates where produced using the optimal formulation by electrospraying and also by spray-drying. The obtained encapsulates were characterized based on their morphology and particle size distribution. Moreover, their surface nitrogen content was evaluated to determine the encapsulation efficiency. Finally, the in vitro retention of DPP-IV-inhibitory activity by the encapsulated hydrolysate was investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Whey protein hydrolysate (84 wt.% protein content), which was used as model protein in the optimization of the formulation, and the Arabic gum were kindly donated by Abbott Laboratories S.A. (Granada, Spain) and Nexira (Serqueux, France), respectively. Pullulan was supplied by Hayashibara Co., Ltd. (Okayama, Japan). Tween 20 was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany). Tenebrio molitor meal (68.01 wt.% protein) was kindly provided by Tebrio (Salamanca, Spain), which was ground to powder. Alcalase (subtilisin, EC 3.4.21.62) was purchased from Novozymes (Bagsvaerd, Denmark). DPP-IV enzyme (EC 3.4.14.5) and the substrate Gly-pro-p-nitroanilide were supplied by Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and stored at −20 °C until use.

2.2. Production of the Tenebrio molitor Protein Hydrolysate

The enzymatic hydrolysis of Tenebrio molitor meal was conducted in a jacketed reactor connected to an automatic titrator (718 Stat Titrino, Metrohm, Herisau, Switzerland). Briefly, the T. molitor hydrolysis was conducted at 50 °C and pH 8. Thirty g/L protein was dissolved in distilled water and Alcalase 2.4 L (EC 3.4.21.62) was added at the beginning of the reaction at a 3% enzyme-to-substrate (protein) ratio. The reaction continued until the degree of hydrolysis (DH), measured by the pH-stat method [52], was 20%. The resulting hydrolysate was then deactivated by heating the solution at 100 °C for 15 min, centrifuged at 5300× g for 15 min, and vacuum-filtered through an 8 µm cellulose filter. The supernatant was lyophilized (LyoMicron, Coolvacuum Technologies S.L., Barcelona, Spain) and the powdered product was stored at −20 °C. The nitrogen content of the obtained hydrolysate powder was determined in triplicate according to the Dumas method using a Flash 2000 CHNS/O elemental analyzer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Protein content was calculated assuming a nitrogen-to-protein factor of 5.6 [53], resulting in 68.47 ± 0.39 wt.%.

2.3. Production of Electrosprayed Capsules

To encapsulate the T. molitor hydrolysate, Arabic gum and pullulan were used as encapsulating material and Tween 20 was employed as surfactant. These compounds were dissolved in distilled water and stirred overnight (350 rpm) at room temperature. The concentration of protein was kept at 20 wt.% in the final capsule, whereas Arabic gum at 15 wt.% and pullulan at 1–4 wt.% were referred to the feed formulation. Tween 20 at 1 wt.% (referred to Arabic gum and pullulan) was also used. The solution was electrosprayed utilizing a system comprising a drying chamber, equipped with a high-voltage power supply (adjustable up to 30 kV), a syringe pump, and a collector plate (15 × 15 cm, made of stainless steel) (SpinBox Electrospinning; Bioinicia, Valencia, Spain). A 5 mL syringe containing the solutions was mounted onto the syringe pump and 16 G needles (Proto Advantage, Hamilton, ON, Canada) were used. A monoaxial single-phase emitter (one needle) was used for the optimization of the formulation, while a monoaxial multi-emitter consisting of five parallel needles was used for increasing the productivity of the optimum formulation. The emitter was positioned 15 cm away from the collector plate in a horizontal configuration. The flow rate and voltage were kept at 0.2 mL/h and 22 kV, respectively. The electrospraying process was carried out at room temperature and relative humidity conditions (21–27 °C, 36–51 %RH) in batches of 1 h. The powder collected from the different batches was gently mixed and stored in plastic Eppendorf tubes at 4 °C until further use.

2.4. Production of the Spray-Dried Capsules

The obtained optimum feed solution containing the T. molitor solution was prepared as previously described to produce electrosprayed capsules, with and without pullulan and Tween 20. The spray-drying process was carried out in a laboratory-scale spray-drier (Büchi B-190; Büchi Labortechnik, Flawill, Switzerland) using a nozzle with a diameter of 0.7 mm (Büchi, Flawill, Switzerland). The temperature of inlet air was set at 190 °C and the temperature of the outlet air was kept at 95–97 °C. The drying airflow was fixed at 25 Nm3/h. Once the different microcapsules were collected, they were stored at −20 °C in the dark until analysis.

2.5. Characterization of the Capsules

2.5.1. Morphology and Particle Size Distribution

The morphology of the capsules was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) on a FESEM microscope (LEO 1500 GEMINI, Zeiss, Germany). Depending on the employed encapsulation technique, a slender layer of microcapsules (via spray-drying) or a segment of aluminum foil measuring approximately 0.5 × 0.5 cm enclosing the sample (via electrospraying) was affixed onto a carbon tape on a pin and carbon-coated using an EMITECH K975X Turbo-Pumped Thermal Evaporator (Quorum Technologies, Lewes, UK). SEM images were captured in the range of 2K×–20K× in case of the electrosprayed capsules, and 200×–2K× in the case of spray-dried capsules with a 3 kV accelerating voltage and 30 µm aperture. The particle size distributions and mean diameters were determined by measuring 200 randomly selected particles using the ImageJ software (https://imagej.net/ij/index.html, accessed on 7 May 2024) (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

2.5.2. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

The presence of T. molitor hydrolysate on the surface of the microparticles was analyzed by determining the nitrogen surface using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The microparticles were transferred to a glass slide and analyzed using a Kratos Axis Ultra-DLD (Kratos Analytical, Manchester, UK) The samples were subjected to both an overall spectrum analysis (under the conditions of 75 W power and 160 eV pass energy) and a quantification of carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen. Charge neutralization was activated, and the penetration depth was maintained at less than 10 nm.

2.5.3. DPP-IV Inhibitory Activity

The DPP-IV-inhibitory activity of the produced T. molitor hydrolysate and the microcapsules loaded with the hydrolysate was measured following a modified protocol based on Lacroix and Li-Chan (2012) [54]. Briefly, 25 μL of DPP-IV enzyme at 0.02 U/mL were incubated at 37 °C with 100 μL of T. molitor hydrolysate or capsules aqueous solutions at varying concentrations (0.25–5 mg/mL) for 10 min. Subsequently, the reaction was initiated by the addition of 50 μL of 1 mM Gly-Pro-p-nitroanilide. The release of the reaction product (p-nitroanilide) was monitored by measuring absorbance at 405 nm every 2 min for 2 h at 37 °C using a Multiskan FC microplate photometer (Thermo Scientific, Vantaa, Finland). Each sample was analyzed in triplicate and a color control was added. The inhibition activity was calculated by comparing the reaction progress to a control (distilled water) as follows:
D P P - I V   i n h i b i t i o n   ( % ) = ( 1 p i ) p 0 · 100
where pi is the slope in the presence of the inhibitor (peptide) and p0 is the slope obtained in the absence of the inhibitor (control). The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of each sample was calculated. Results are expressed in mg protein/mL as the mean ± standard deviation.

2.5.4. Statistical Analysis

The dataset underwent analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Statgraphics version 5.1 (Statistical Graphics Corp., Rockville, MD, USA). Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) multiple range test was employed at the 95% confidence level (p < 0.05) to discern significant variations among mean values.

3. Results

3.1. Optimization of the Formulation for Electrospraying

Arabic gum was employed as the main encapsulating agent due to its excellent encapsulating properties such as water solubility, stabilizing and emulsifying properties, and the low viscosity of its aqueous solutions [43]. Additionally, Tween 20, a non-ionic surfactant, was used to improve the solution properties by reducing surface tension and enhancing the viscoelastic properties [55,56]. Finally, to enhance the stability of the Taylor cone and, thus, the electrospraying process, the addition of pullulan as a secondary encapsulating agent was tested. The addition of pullulan leads to an increase in the viscoelasticity of the feed solution due to the interactions and entanglements that occur between the pullulan chains and between the chains of Arabic gum and pullulan [49]. The latter enhances the stability of the Taylor cone when working at a higher flowrate, which increases productivity [57]. Nevertheless, pullulan exhibits a high electrospinning capacity in water-based solutions, which is not beneficial for the intended application, as electrospun fibers, unlike nano/microcapsules, result in continuous mats that are challenging to disperse in any food matrix [58].
First, the optimization of the Arabic gum content in the feed was investigated. Since Arabic gum in the range 15–40 wt.% does not properly electrospray, and based on previous studies using glucose syrup and dextran [57], we fixed the Arabic gum concentration in the feed to 15 wt.%, which will lead to low viscoelasticity and a reduced capsule size, and adding a low content of pullulan and 1 wt.% of Tween 20 (with respect to total biopolymer). Therefore, the solution comprised 20 wt.% (in the final capsule) of whey protein, which was used as model protein, 15 wt.% Arabic gum and 1 wt.% Tween 20 (referred to pullulan and Arabic gum concentrations) was electrosprayed, varying the concentration of pullulan in the range 0.5–4 wt.%. Samples were characterized using SEM (Figure 1). As expected, in capsules with lower amounts of pullulan (i.e., 0.5, 0.75, and 1 wt.%), there was only a faint hint of any strands emerging from the capsules, while for concentrations of above 1 wt.%, a greater number and longer strands could be observed. When pullulan concentrations reached 2 wt.%, a notable change in the morphology of the capsules became apparent, transitioning from spheres to interwoven and thick fibers, which turned especially visible at 3 and 4 wt.%. This was attributed, as mentioned before, to the high electrospinning capability exhibited by pullulan [58]. It should be noted that solutions with both 0.5 wt.% and 0.75 wt.% pullulan concentrations manifested a marginally superior capsule morphology in comparison to the encapsulates with a 1 wt.% concentration. Nevertheless, the observed productivity was much lower for the first two formulations, when the pullulan concentration was kept under 1 wt.%. These two formulations (those with 0.5 and 0.75 wt.%) also presented a higher instability in achieving and maintaining a stable Taylor cone during the electrospraying process, which was manifested as an elongated shape of the cone as well as the reduced productivity of the process. Taking all these aspects into consideration, the formulation composed of 1 wt.% pullulan was deemed as the optimum.

3.2. Morphology and Particle Size Distribution of Electrosprayed and Spray-Dried Capsules

SEM micrographs of the resulting T. molitor encapsulates from electrospraying (a) and spray-drying (b–c) processes are presented in Figure 2. The same formulation containing T. molitor hydrolysate, Arabic gum, Tween 20, and pullulan was both electrosprayed (Figure 2a) and spray-dried (Figure 2b). Figure 2c shows the SEM image of the capsules obtained by spray-drying, where the dried feed solution only contains Arabic gum and hydrolysate (e.g., without the additives pullulan and Tween 20). It can be observed in the three SEM images that most of the capsules were non-agglomerated, exhibiting a spherical shape with a wrinkled surface and concavities. The loss of spherical shape exhibited by various capsules might be attributed to an incomplete solvent evaporation and the unraveling of biopolymer chains, causing the unsolidified particles to be prone to deformation upon contacting the collector/walls of the equipment [59]. Regarding the wrinkles and concavities present on the surface of the capsules, these are characteristic of Arabic gum and could be attributed to the non-uniform distribution of this biopolymer within the droplets [59,60] and the slow formation of this encapsulating agent film/crust during the drying process [61]. In the case of spray-dried capsules, several authors also suggest that this phenomenon may be related to the contraction experienced by the particles during drying and cooling [62]. Comparing Figure 2b,c, it was noticeable that capsules containing pullulan and Tween 20 showed a moderately smoother surface. This reduction in wrinkles and indentations on the surface of the capsules was associated with the surfactant, owing to the preferential migration of Tween 20 molecules onto the surface of droplets/particles during atomization and drying [63,64].
The particle size distribution of the electrosprayed and spray-dried capsules is depicted in Figure 3. The particle size distribution of nano-microcapsules obtained by electrospraying was significantly narrower (ranging from 0.5 to 3.1 µm) compared to that of the microcapsules produced by spray-drying (ranging from 4.6–3.4 to 39–36 µm with/without the presence of additives, respectively). For an electrospraying technique, capsules with an average size of 1.2 ± 0.5 µm were produced, with 91% of them having a diameter below 2 µm. This smaller particle size obtained employing the electrospraying method is attributed to the breakup of droplets through Coulombic repulsion forces during the process, promoting the formation of ultrafine encapsulates with a narrow diameter distribution at the high voltage used (22 kV) [35]. This is also facilitated by the presence of Tween 20 as a surfactant, as it reduces the surface tension and aids in the disintegration of droplets, leading to the formation of finer and smaller particles [47,65].
Microcapsules obtained by spray-drying, which contain additives, had an average size of 12.4 ± 8.7 µm, while those without additives showed an average size of 11.3 ± 5.76 µm. It is worth noting that there was a higher number of microcapsules of larger size when pullulan and Tween 20 were present. Specifically, only 78% of the capsules were under 20 µm in the presence of additives compared to 95% when no additives were included. This was most likely due to the higher solids content and thus the increased viscosity of the solution provided when adding pullulan and Tween 20, bringing about larger droplets after atomization and, consequently, larger particles [36,66]. Despite the larger size of the spray-dried capsules compared to the electrosprayed ones, it can be considered sufficiently small, as it is in the order of tens of microns. In fact, according to previous studies, particles with sizes below 50 µm are not capable of being detected as individual entities in the human mouth [67]. Therefore, these microcapsules obtained by spray-drying could be employed to enrich food matrices without the capsules being perceptible on the taste buds. Moreover, a high surface-area-to-volume ratio (small capsules) results in a quicker release, as fluids can penetrate the particles more easily, facilitating enhanced bioactive diffusion and the accelerated degradation of the polymeric matrix [45]. Nevertheless, it should be highlighted that, through the spray-drying process, it is common to obtain a broad size range and particle size distribution for the produced encapsulates [68]. This variation could result in capsules exhibiting a diverse performance concerning the protection and administration of bioactive peptides [37,69].

3.3. Surface Nitrogen of the Capsules

To assess the effectiveness of the encapsulation of T. molitor hydrolysate, the mass concentration of nitrogen on the surface of the capsules was determined. The surface nitrogen concentration of the hydrolysate and the encapsulating agents, namely Arabic gum and pullulan, was also determined. Nevertheless, that of Tween 20, being a fluid, could not be evaluated, although nitrogen is not present in the molecule of Tween 20. The XPS spectra of the samples are illustrated in Figure 4. The various peaks correspond to the identification of carbon at 283.0 eV, nitrogen at 398.0 eV, and oxygen at 530.0 eV. While the peaks corresponding to carbon and oxygen can be observed for all the samples, the carbon peak is particularly intense for the protein hydrolysate, as expected from its composition (Figure 4c). The peak corresponding to nitrogen is only significantly present in the Tenebrio molitor hydrolysate (Figure 4c) and the corresponding capsules (Figure 4d–f). Therefore, the presence of nitrogen on the surface of the encapsulates indicates that some of the peptides must have migrated to the surface of the capsules during the drying processes.
The quantification of the amount of each material at the surface of the samples is shown in Figure 5 in terms of peak intensities. As can be observed, a small concentration of nitrogen, specifically 0.44 wt.%, was found on the Arabic gum sample. This compound is primarily constituted of polysaccharides, but it also contains a small protein fraction (<2 wt.%) in its composition [70], which could justify the presence of nitrogen on its surface (small peak shown in Figure 4a). Although pullulan is a polysaccharide and, therefore, should not contain nitrogen in its composition, the XPS revealed a nitrogen concentration on its surface of 0.49 wt.%, which could be attributed to sample contamination during its preparation or measurement. Regarding the hydrolysate, a concentration of nitrogen of 10 wt.% was found when using XPS. In comparison, all capsules presented lower surface nitrogen values than the hydrolysate, which implies that encapsulation was achieved. Electrosprayed capsules exhibited 7 wt.% of surface nitrogen, spray-dried capsules containing additives had 7.4 wt.% of surface nitrogen, and spray-dried capsules without additives 9.5 wt.%. Thus, capsules produced by electrospraying and spray-drying with additives presented a similar concentration of nitrogen on the surface, whereas the highest content of surface nitrogen was obtained for the spray-dried capsules without additives. This was most likely due to the absence of surfactant, as Tween 20 molecules migrate more readily to the air–liquid interface than peptides because of their higher surface activity. Tween 20 is also capable of forming networks with the peptides and, consequently, restricting their movement to the interface [71]. Therefore, both the preferential migration and capability to form networks of Tween 20 reduce the aggregation/localization of the peptides at the interface during spray-drying and electrospraying processes. Nonetheless, it is normal to find the diffusion of the protein to the surface due to drying kinetics, as the surface activities of peptides could result in their adsorption onto the droplet surface, inducing a diffusional flux towards it. Additionally, as the evaporating droplet diminishes, its receding surface contributes to a rise in solute concentrations at the surface [72].

3.4. DPP-IV Inhibitory Activity

After encapsulation, it is crucial that the bioactive peptides comprising the hydrolysate maintain their original bioactivity. Hence, the DPP-IV-inhibitory activity of the non-encapsulated T. molitor hydrolysate was compared to that of the encapsulated hydrolysate. The results are expressed as the concentration of protein either in the non- or encapsulated forms at which 50% inhibition of the enzyme was achieved (IC50), as presented in Figure 6. The IC50 value for the initial T. molitor hydrolysate was 1.29 ± 0.07 mg protein/mL. Garzón et al. (2023) reported a similar value, approximately 1.5 mg protein/mL, for the brewer’s spent grain hydrolysate, employing Neutral protease-Purazyme and Flavourzyme enzymes for the hydrolysis procedure [40]. The inhibitory activity of the hydrolysates depends on several factors regarding their peptide composition, among which their peptide chain length (PCL), their content of hydrophobic amino acids, and the position of said amino acids play significant roles [73,74]. Particularly, short peptides (<7 amino acids), with the presence of proline between the first and fourth positions relative to N-terminal, and alanine, in the first or second position relative to the N-terminal, have been determined as favorable [75,76]. Concerning this, numerous studies indicate that T. molitor larvae meal exhibits a composition rich in leucine, valine, alanine, and proline [77,78]. This composition could explain the high DPP-IV inhibitory activity observed on T. molitor hydrolysates by various studies, reporting IC50 values of 0.83 and 0.91 mg protein/mL using Papain [79], and Flavourzyme [80] enzymes for hydrolysis, which aligns with our results.
In comparison, the electrosprayed encapsulates as well as the spray-dried encapsulates containing additives showed a similar percentage of DPP-IV inhibition when compared to the free hydrolysate, with an IC50 value of 1.50 ± 0.07 mg protein/mL 1.61 ± 0.08 mg protein/mL, respectively. On the other hand, the spray-dried capsules without additives presented a significantly higher IC50 value (1.99 ± 0.03 mg protein/mL) when compared to those of the electrosprayed and spray-dried (with additives) capsules. Therefore, the DPP-IV inhibitory activity decreased by 16.16%, 24.13%, and 53.60%, respectively, for the electrospraying, spray-drying with additives or spray-drying without additives in the encapsulation processes. It is worth noting that Garzón et al. (2023) reported higher values, around 3.5 mg protein/mL, for the encapsulates obtained by spray-drying using agar and/or carrageenan together with maltodextrin as carriers when encapsulating a hydrolysate with an initial IC50 value around 1.5 mg protein/mL [40].
Regarding the loss of bioactivity in the electrosprayed capsules, this might be attributed to a slight denaturation of the peptides due to the high voltage used or a potential detrimental interaction between the peptides and the biopolymers used. Nevertheless, the electrospraying process is conducted at room temperature, and thus, there is no significant loss of their activity. Onyekuru et al. (2021b) found that, for the encapsulation of alkaline phosphatase with PEO as an encapsulating agent, employing a voltage of 22.5 kV led to a minor loss of enzyme activity [81]. With respect to the spray-dried capsules, the decrease in the inhibitory activity of the DPP-IV enzyme was most likely due to the high temperature involved in the process, leading to the thermal degradation of the hydrolysate, although this degradation should be minimal for inlet temperatures ranging from 130 to 190 °C and outlet temperatures below 100 °C, as reported in the literature [82,83]. The loss of inhibitory activity in spray-dried capsules without additives was noticeably higher and could be related to the absence of Tween 20. This surfactant tends to migrate to the surface of the capsule and form networks with the peptides, preventing them from moving towards it and avoiding further degradation due to exposure to heat at the surface of the particle. This reduced migration of peptides to the interface also results in minimized damage caused by shear tension and dehydration stress during the drying of droplets, enhancing the bioactivity of the peptides [71]. Hence, a lower nitrogen concentration on the surface implies that peptides have remained inside the capsule, where they are better protected. In fact, after conducting a correlation comparative between the surface nitrogen and the DPP-IV enzyme inhibition, it was found that the coefficient of determination (R2) was 0.99. In addition to the process conditions and the incorporation of Tween 20, another factor that may have affected the bioactivity is the secondary encapsulating agent. No studies have been found in the literature employing pullulan as a carrier of compounds with antidiabetic activity. Nevertheless, Rahmani-Manglano et al. (2023) reported that the addition of pullulan improved the oxidative stability of omega-3 encapsulates due to its inherently impermeability to oxygen [69]. Hence, it would be interesting to investigate in future studies whether pullulan influences antidiabetic activity.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the encapsulation of Tenebrio molitor hydrolysate was studied using electrospraying and spray-drying processes with Arabic gum as the primary encapsulating agent. The addition of pullulan to improve viscoelasticity was studied, and the concentration was optimized at 1 wt.% together with the use of Tween 20 to obtain a stable electrospraying process. Electrospraying yielded better results in terms of size and particle distribution compared to spray-drying, producing smaller and more uniform capsules. There was no significant difference observed between the electrosprayed capsules and spray-dried capsules containing additives regarding the nitrogen content on their surface or DPP-IV inhibitory activity. Conversely, spray-dried capsules without additives showed a lower bioactivity and encapsulation efficiency with a higher mass concentration of nitrogen on the surface. This was attributed to the absence of surfactant, which acts to reduce the migration of peptides to the liquid/air interface during drying. Overall, it could be noted that microcapsules obtained by spray-drying when adding additives (pullulan and Tween 20) to the feed resulted in a similar encapsulation efficiency and antidiabetic activity, as achieved for the capsules obtained by electrospraying. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that spray-drying provides higher productivity than electrospraying due to its superior scalability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.J.G.-M. and E.M.G.; investigation, L.M.-S. and C.B.-G.; data curation, L.M.-S. and C.B.-G.; writing—original draft preparation, L.M.-S. and C.B.-G.; writing—review and editing, C.B.-G., E.M.G. and P.J.G.-M.; visualization, C.B.-G.; supervision, P.J.G.-M. and E.M.G.; project administration, P.J.G.-M. and E.M.G.; funding acquisition, E.M.G. and P.J.G.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the grant PID2020-114137RB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

Whey protein hydrolysate was kindly provided by Abbott Laboratories S.A (Granada, Spain). Arabic gum was kindly donated by Nexira (Serqueux, France). Tenebrio molitor meal was kindly provided by Tebrio (Salamanca, Spain).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. IDF Diabetes Atlas 2021|IDF Diabetes Atlas. Available online: https://diabetesatlas.org/atlas/tenth-edition/ (accessed on 11 March 2024).
  2. Galicia-Garcia, U.; Benito-Vicente, A.; Jebari, S.; Larrea-Sebal, A.; Siddiqi, H.; Uribe, K.B.; Ostolaza, H.; Martín, C. Pathophysiology of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Howard-Thompson, A.; Khan, M.; Jones, M.; George, C.M. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Outpatient Insulin Management. Am. Fam. Physician 2018, 97, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Drucker, D.J. Enhancing the Action of Incretin Hormones: A New Whey Forward? Endocrinology 2006, 147, 3171–3172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Makrilakis, K. The Role of DPP-4 Inhibitors in the Treatment Algorithm of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: When to Select, What to Expect. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Krentz, A.J.; Patel, M.B.; Bailey, C.J. New Drugs for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Drugs 2008, 68, 2131–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ahrén, B. DPP-4 Inhibitors. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 21, 517–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Antony, P.; Vijayan, R. Bioactive Peptides as Potential Nutraceuticals for Diabetes Therapy: A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Berraquero-García, C.; Rivero-Pino, F.; Ospina, J.L.; Pérez-Gálvez, R.; Espejo-Carpio, F.J.; Guadix, A.; García-Moreno, P.J.; Guadix, E.M. Activity, Structural Features and in Silico Digestion of Antidiabetic Peptides. Food Biosci. 2023, 55, 102954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Masood, R.; Khosravi-Darani, K. Biopeptides in Milk: Opiate and Antithrombotic Effects. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2015, 15, 872–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rizzello, C.G.; Tagliazucchi, D.; Babini, E.; Sefora Rutella, G.; Taneyo Saa, D.L.; Gianotti, A. Bioactive Peptides from Vegetable Food Matrices: Research Trends and Novel Biotechnologies for Synthesis and Recovery. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 27, 549–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rivero-Pino, F.; Guadix, A.; Guadix, E.M. Identification of Novel Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV and α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Peptides from Tenebrio molitor. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 873–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gravel, A.; Doyen, A. The Use of Edible Insect Proteins in Food: Challenges and Issues Related to Their Functional Properties. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2020, 59, 102272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nowak, V.; Persijn, D.; Rittenschober, D.; Charrondiere, U.R. Review of Food Composition Data for Edible Insects. Food Chem. 2016, 193, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. De Marco, M.; Martínez, S.; Hernandez, F.; Madrid, J.; Gai, F.; Rotolo, L.; Belforti, M.; Bergero, D.; Katz, H.; Dabbou, S.; et al. Nutritional Value of Two Insect Larval Meals (Tenebrio molitor and Hermetia illucens) for Broiler Chickens: Apparent Nutrient Digestibility, Apparent Ileal Amino Acid Digestibility and Apparent Metabolizable Energy. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2015, 209, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yoo, J.S.; Cho, K.H.; Hong, J.S.; Jang, H.S.; Chung, Y.H.; Kwon, G.T.; Shin, D.G.; Kim, Y.Y. Nutrient Ileal Digestibility Evaluation of Dried Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) Larvae Compared to Three Animal Protein by-Products in Growing Pigs. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 32, 387–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Cho, K.H.; Kang, S.W.; Yoo, J.S.; Song, D.K.; Chung, Y.H.; Kwon, G.T.; Kim, Y.Y. Effects of Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) Larvae Hydrolysate on Nutrient Ileal Digestibility in Growing Pigs Compared to Those of Defatted Mealworm Larvae Meal, Fermented Poultry By-Product, and Hydrolyzed Fish Soluble. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 33, 490–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Benzertiha, A.; Kierończyk, B.; Rawski, M.; Józefiak, A.; Kozłowski, K.; Jankowski, J.; Józefiak, D. Tenebrio molitor and Zophobas morio Full-Fat Meals in Broiler Chicken Diets: Effects on Nutrients Digestibility, Digestive Enzyme Activities, and Cecal Microbiome. Animals 2019, 9, 1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Benzertiha, A.; Kierończyk, B.; Kołodziejski, P.; Pruszyńska–Oszmałek, E.; Rawski, M.; Józefiak, D.; Józefiak, A. Tenebrio molitor and Zophobas morio Full-Fat Meals as Functional Feed Additives Affect Broiler Chickens’ Growth Performance and Immune System Traits. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Errico, S.; Spagnoletta, A.; Verardi, A.; Moliterni, S.; Dimatteo, S.; Sangiorgio, P. Tenebrio molitor as a Source of Interesting Natural Compounds, Their Recovery Processes, Biological Effects, and Safety Aspects. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2022, 21, 148–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Aguilar-Toala, J.E.; Quintanar-Guerrero, D.; Liceaga, A.M.; Zambrano- Zaragoza, M.L. Encapsulation of Bioactive Peptides: A Strategy to Improve the Stability, Protect the Nutraceutical Bioactivity and Support Their Food Applications. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 6449–6458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Iwaniak, A.; Hrynkiewicz, M.; Bucholska, J.; Minkiewicz, P.; Darewicz, M. Understanding the Nature of Bitter-Taste Di- and Tripeptides Derived from Food Proteins Based on Chemometric Analysis. J. Food Biochem. 2019, 43, e12500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Karami, Z.; Akbari-adergani, B. Bioactive Food Derived Peptides: A Review on Correlation between Structure of Bioactive Peptides and Their Functional Properties. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 56, 535–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pei, J.; Gao, X.; Pan, D.; Hua, Y.; He, J.; Liu, Z.; Dang, Y. Advances in the Stability Challenges of Bioactive Peptides and Improvement Strategies. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2022, 5, 2162–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Perry, S.L.; McClements, D.J. Recent Advances in Encapsulation, Protection, and Oral Delivery of Bioactive Proteins and Peptides Using Colloidal Systems. Molecules 2020, 25, 1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sun, X.; Okagu, O.D.; Udenigwe, C.C. Encapsulation Technology for Protection and Delivery of Bioactive Peptides. In Biologically Active Peptides: From Basic Science to Applications for Human Health; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 331–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hosseini, S.F.; Soofi, M.; Rezaei, M. Enhanced Physicochemical Stability of ω-3 PUFAs Concentrates-Loaded Nanoliposomes Decorated by Chitosan/Gelatin Blend Coatings. Food Chem. 2021, 345, 128865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Azevedo, M.A.; Cerqueira, M.A.; Gonçalves, C.; Amado, I.R.; Teixeira, J.A.; Pastrana, L. Encapsulation of Vitamin D3 Using Rhamnolipids-Based Nanostructured Lipid Carriers. Food Chem. 2023, 427, 136654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Li, Q.; Hu, X.; Perkins, P.; Ren, T. Antimicrobial Film Based on Poly(Lactic Acid) and Natural Halloysite Nanotubes for Controlled Cinnamaldehyde Release. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 224, 848–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Yang, G.; Li, F.; Zhang, H.; Yan, H.; Gao, S.; Fu, Y.; Ye, F. Electrospinning for Producing Antifungal Nanofibers Consisting of Prochloraz/Hydroxypropyl-γ-Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complex. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 211, 118282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Talarico, L.; Clemente, I.; Gennari, A.; Gabbricci, G.; Pepi, S.; Leone, G.; Bonechi, C.; Rossi, C.; Mattioli, S.L.; Detta, N.; et al. Physiochemical Characterization of Lipidic Nanoformulations Encapsulating the Antifungal Drug Natamycin. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Alu’datt, M.H.; Alrosan, M.; Gammoh, S.; Tranchant, C.C.; Alhamad, M.N.; Rababah, T.; Zghoul, R.; Alzoubi, H.; Ghatasheh, S.; Ghozlan, K.; et al. Encapsulation-Based Technologies for Bioactive Compounds and Their Application in the Food Industry: A Roadmap for Food-Derived Functional and Health-Promoting Ingredients. Food Biosci. 2022, 50, 101971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Giroldi, M.; Grambusch, I.M.; Neutzling Lehn, D.; Volken de Souza, C.F. Encapsulation of Dairy Protein Hydrolysates: Recent Trends and Future Prospects. Dry. Technol. 2021, 39, 1513–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ma, J.J.; Mao, X.Y.; Wang, Q.; Yang, S.; Zhang, D.; Chen, S.W.; Li, Y.H. Effect of Spray Drying and Freeze Drying on the Immunomodulatory Activity, Bitter Taste and Hygroscopicity of Hydrolysate Derived from Whey Protein Concentrate. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 56, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Abdul Mudalip, S.K.; Khatiman, M.N.; Hashim, N.A.; Che Man, R.; Arshad, Z.I.M. A Short Review on Encapsulation of Bioactive Compounds Using Different Drying Techniques. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 42, 288–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gharsallaoui, A.; Roudaut, G.; Chambin, O.; Voilley, A.; Saurel, R. Applications of Spray-Drying in Microencapsulation of Food Ingredients: An Overview. Food Res. Int. 2007, 40, 1107–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Woo, M.W.; Bhandari, B. Spray Drying for Food Powder Production. In Handbook of Food Powders: Processes and Properties; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2013; pp. 29–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kaur, P.; Singh, S.K.; Garg, V.; Gulati, M.; Vaidya, Y. Optimization of Spray Drying Process for Formulation of Solid Dispersion Containing Polypeptide-k Powder through Quality by Design Approach. Powder Technol. 2015, 284, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cian, R.E.; Campos-Soldini, A.; Chel-Guerrero, L.; Drago, S.R.; Betancur-Ancona, D. Bioactive Phaseolus Lunatus Peptides Release from Maltodextrin/Gum Arabic Microcapsules Obtained by Spray Drying after Simulated Gastrointestinal Digestion. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 2002–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Garzón, A.G.; Cian, R.E.; Drago, S.R. Effects of Agar-Carrageenan Wall Materials and Core-to-Wall Material Ratio on Physicochemical Properties and In Vitro Bioaccessibility of Microencapsulated Bioactive Peptides. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 139, 108570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bhattacharyya, S.; Feferman, L.; Unterman, T.; Tobacman, J.K. Exposure to Common Food Additive Carrageenan Alone Leads to Fasting Hyperglycemia and in Combination with High Fat Diet Exacerbates Glucose Intolerance and Hyperlipidemia without Effect on Weight. J. Diabetes Res. 2015, 2015, 513429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Feferman, L.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Oates, E.; Haggerty, N.; Wang, T.; Varady, K.; Tobacman, J.K.; Zhao, R. Carrageenan-Free Diet Shows Improved Glucose Tolerance and Insulin Signaling in Prediabetes: A Randomized, Pilot Clinical Trial. J. Diabetes Res. 2020, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Daoub, R.M.A.; Elmubarak, A.H.; Misran, M.; Hassan, E.A.; Osman, M.E. Characterization and Functional Properties of Some Natural Acacia Gums. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2018, 17, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Phillips, G.O. Acacia Gum (Gum Arabic): A Nutritional Fibre; Metabolism and Calorific Value. Food Addit. Contam. 1998, 15, 251–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bock, N.; Dargaville, T.R.; Woodruff, M.A. Electrospraying of Polymers with Therapeutic Molecules: State of the Art. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 1510–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xue, J.; Wu, T.; Dai, Y.; Xia, Y. Electrospinning and Electrospun Nanofibers: Methods, Materials, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 5298–5415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. García-Moreno, P.J.; Rahmani-Manglano, N.E.; Chronakis, I.S.; Guadix, E.M.; Yesiltas, B.; Sørensen, A.D.M.; Jacobsen, C. Omega-3 Nano-Microencapsulates Produced by Electrohydrodynamic Processing. In Omega-3 Delivery Systems: Production, Physical Characterization and Oxidative Stability; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 345–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kumar, A.; Belhaj, M.; DiPette, D.J.; Potts, J.D. A Novel Alginate-Based Delivery System for the Prevention and Treatment of Pressure-Overload Induced Heart Failure. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 11, 602952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Furtmann, B.; Tang, J.; Kramer, S.; Eickner, T.; Luderer, F.; Fricker, G.; Gomez, A.; Heemskerk, B.; Jähn, P.S. Electrospray Synthesis of Poly(Lactide-Co-Glycolide) Nanoparticles Encapsulating Peptides to Enhance Proliferation of Antigen-Specific CD8+ T Cells. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 106, 3316–3327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Moreira, A.; Lawson, D.; Onyekuru, L.; Dziemidowicz, K.; Angkawinitwong, U.; Costa, P.F.; Radacsi, N.; Williams, G.R. Protein Encapsulation by Electrospinning and Electrospraying. J. Control. Release 2021, 329, 1172–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Musaei, M.; Mokhtari, J.; Nouri, M.; Rad, Z.P. Fabrication and Characterization of Nanocapsules of PLGA Containing BSA Using Electrospray Technique. Nanomed. Res. J. 2017, 2, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Adler-Nissen, J. Enzymic Hydrolysis of Food Proteins; Elsevier Applied Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1986; pp. 9–17, 146–147. [Google Scholar]
  53. Janssen, R.H.; Vincken, J.P.; Van Den Broek, L.A.M.; Fogliano, V.; Lakemond, C.M.M. Nitrogen-to-Protein Conversion Factors for Three Edible Insects: Tenebrio molitor, Alphitobius diaperinus, and Hermetia illucens. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 2275–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lacroix, I.M.E.; Li-Chan, E.C.Y. Dipeptidyl Peptidase-IV Inhibitory Activity of Dairy Protein Hydrolysates. Int. Dairy. J. 2012, 25, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lin, T.; Wang, H.; Wang, H.; Wang, X. The Charge Effect of Cationic Surfactants on the Elimination of Fibre Beads in the electrospinning of Polystyrene. Nanotechnology 2004, 15, 1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Perez-Masia, R.; Lagaron, J.M.; Lopez-Rubio, A. Surfactant-Aided Electrospraying of Low Molecular Weight Carbohydrate Polymers from Aqueous Solutions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 101, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. García-Moreno, P.J.; Pelayo, A.; Yu, S.; Busolo, M.; Lagaron, J.M.; Chronakis, I.S.; Jacobsen, C. Physicochemical Characterization and Oxidative Stability of Fish Oil-Loaded Electrosprayed Capsules: Combined Use of Whey Protein and Carbohydrates as Wall Materials. J. Food Eng. 2018, 231, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jacobsen, C.; García-Moreno, P.J.; Mendes, A.C.; Mateiu, R.V.; Chronakis, I.S. Use of Electrohydrodynamic Processing for Encapsulation of Sensitive Bioactive Compounds and Applications in Food. Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 9, 525–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Zaeim, D.; Sarabi-Jamab, M.; Ghorani, B.; Kadkhodaee, R.; Tromp, R.H. Electrospray-Assisted Drying of Live Probiotics in Acacia Gum Microparticles Matrix. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 183, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Subtil, S.F.; Rocha-Selmi, G.A.; Thomazini, M.; Trindade, M.A.; Netto, F.M.; Favaro-Trindade, C.S. Effect of Spray Drying on the Sensory and Physical Properties of Hydrolysed Casein Using Gum Arabic as the Carrier. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 2014–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ré, M.I. Microencapsulation by spray drying. Dry. Technol. 1998, 16, 1195–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kurozawa, L.E.; Park, K.J.; Hubinger, M.D. Effect of Carrier Agents on the Physicochemical Properties of a Spray Dried Chicken Meat Protein Hydrolysate. J. Food Eng. 2009, 94, 326–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Adler, M.; Unger, M.; Lee, G. Surface Composition of Spray-Dried Particles of Bovine Serum Albumin/Trehalose/Surfactant. Pharm. Res. 2000, 17, 863–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Adhikari, B.; Howes, T.; Wood, B.J.; Bhandari, B.R. The Effect of Low Molecular Weight Surfactants and Proteins on Surface Stickiness of Sucrose during Powder Formation through Spray Drying. J. Food Eng. 2009, 94, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ghaeb, M.; Tavanai, H.; Kadivar, M. Electrosprayed Maize Starch and Its Constituents (Amylose and Amylopectin) Nanoparticles. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2015, 26, 917–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hogan, S.A.; McNamee, B.F.; O’Riordan, E.D.; O’Sullivan, M. Emulsification and Microencapsulation Properties of Sodium Caseinate/Carbohydrate Blends. Int. Dairy. J. 2001, 11, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. McClements, D.J. Encapsulation, Protection, and Delivery of Bioactive Proteins and Peptides Using Nanoparticle and Microparticle Systems: A Review. Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2018, 253, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Berraquero-García, C.; Pérez-Gálvez, R.; Espejo-Carpio, F.J.; Guadix, A.; Guadix, E.M.; García-Moreno, P.J. Encapsulation of Bioactive Peptides by Spray-Drying and Electrospraying. Foods 2023, 12, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Rahmani-Manglano, N.E.; Guadix, E.M.; Jacobsen, C.; García-Moreno, P.J. Comparative Study on the Oxidative Stability of Encapsulated Fish Oil by Monoaxial or Coaxial Electrospraying and Spray-Drying. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Sanchez, C.; Renard, D.; Robert, P.; Schmitt, C.; Lefebvre, J. Structure and Rheological Properties of Acacia Gum Dispersions. Food Hydrocoll. 2002, 16, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sarabandi, K.; Jafari, S.M. Improving the Antioxidant Stability of Flaxseed Peptide Fractions during Spray Drying Encapsulation by Surfactants: Physicochemical and Morphological Features. J. Food Eng. 2020, 286, 110131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Vehring, R. Pharmaceutical Particle Engineering via Spray Drying. Pharm. Res. 2008, 25, 999–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ojeda-Montes, M.J.; Gimeno, A.; Tomas-Hernández, S.; Cereto-Massagué, A.; Beltrán-Debón, R.; Valls, C.; Mulero, M.; Pujadas, G.; Garcia-Vallvé, S. Activity and Selectivity Cliffs for DPP-IV Inhibitors: Lessons We Can Learn from SAR Studies and Their Application to Virtual Screening. Med. Res. Rev. 2018, 38, 1874–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. González-Montoya, M.; Hernández-Ledesma, B.; Mora-Escobedo, R.; Martínez-Villaluenga, C. Bioactive Peptides from Germinated Soybean with Anti-Diabetic Potential by Inhibition of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-IV, α-Amylase, and α-Glucosidase Enzymes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yu, Y.; Jin, Y.; Wang, F.; Yan, J.; Qi, Y.; Ye, M. Protein Digestomic Analysis Reveals the Bioactivity of Deer Antler Velvet in Simulated Gastrointestinal Digestion. Food Res. Int. 2017, 96, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Nongonierma, A.B.; Dellafiora, L.; Paolella, S.; Galaverna, G.; Cozzini, P.; FitzGerald, R.J. In Silico Approaches Applied to the Study of Peptide Analogs of Ile-Pro-Ile in Relation to Their Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV Inhibitory Properties. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 377191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yu, X.; He, Q.; Wang, D. Dynamic Analysis of Major Components in the Different Developmental Stages of Tenebrio molitor. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 689746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Azagoh, C.; Ducept, F.; Garcia, R.; Rakotozafy, L.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Keller, S.; Lewandowski, R.; Mezdour, S. Extraction and Physicochemical Characterization of Tenebrio molitor Proteins. Food Res. Int. 2016, 88, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Dávalos Terán, I.; Imai, K.; Lacroix, I.M.E.; Fogliano, V.; Udenigwe, C.C. Bioinformatics of Edible Yellow Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) Proteome Reveal the Cuticular Proteins as Promising Precursors of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-IV Inhibitors. J. Food Biochem. 2020, 44, e13121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Tan, J.; Yang, J.; Zhou, X.; Hamdy, A.M.; Zhang, X.; Suo, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, N.; Song, J. Tenebrio molitor Proteins-Derived DPP-4 Inhibitory Peptides: Preparation, Identification, and Molecular Binding Mechanism. Foods 2022, 11, 3626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Onyekuru, L.C.; Moreira, A.; Zhang, J.; Angkawinitwong, U.; Costa, P.F.; Brocchini, S.; Williams, G.R. An Investigation of Alkaline Phosphatase Enzymatic Activity after Electrospinning and Electrospraying. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2021, 64, 102592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Webber, V.; de Siqueira Ferreira, D.; Barreto, P.L.M.; Weiss-Angeli, V.; Vanderlinde, R. Preparation and Characterization of Microparticles of β-Cyclodextrin/Glutathione and Chitosan/Glutathione Obtained by Spray-Drying. Food Res. Int. 2018, 105, 432–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Cao, C.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, C.; Ding, Z.; Sun, F.; Zhao, C. Effect of Inlet Temperature on the Physicochemical Properties of Spray-Dried Seed-Watermelon Seed Protein Powder. J. Food Sci. 2020, 85, 3442–3449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Morphology of the capsules obtained when using 20 wt.% whey protein (in the final capsule), 15 wt.% Arabic gum, 1 wt.% Tween 20 (with respect to the total biopolymers), and pullulan 0.5 wt.% (a), 0.75 wt.% (b), 1 wt.% (c), 2 wt.% (d), 3 wt.% (e) and 4 wt.% (f).
Figure 1. Morphology of the capsules obtained when using 20 wt.% whey protein (in the final capsule), 15 wt.% Arabic gum, 1 wt.% Tween 20 (with respect to the total biopolymers), and pullulan 0.5 wt.% (a), 0.75 wt.% (b), 1 wt.% (c), 2 wt.% (d), 3 wt.% (e) and 4 wt.% (f).
Nanomaterials 14 00840 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of capsules loaded with Tenebrio molitor hydrolysate formulated with pullulan and Tween 20, either electrosprayed (a) or spray-dried (b), and formulated without pullulan and Tween 20 and spray-dried (c).
Figure 2. SEM images of capsules loaded with Tenebrio molitor hydrolysate formulated with pullulan and Tween 20, either electrosprayed (a) or spray-dried (b), and formulated without pullulan and Tween 20 and spray-dried (c).
Nanomaterials 14 00840 g002
Figure 3. Particle size distribution of the capsules produced by electrospraying (a) and spray-drying (b).
Figure 3. Particle size distribution of the capsules produced by electrospraying (a) and spray-drying (b).
Nanomaterials 14 00840 g003
Figure 4. XPS spectra of Arabic gum (a), pullulan (b), Tenebrio molitor hydrolysate (c), and electrosprayed capsules (d) and spray-dried capsules with (e) and without additives (f).
Figure 4. XPS spectra of Arabic gum (a), pullulan (b), Tenebrio molitor hydrolysate (c), and electrosprayed capsules (d) and spray-dried capsules with (e) and without additives (f).
Nanomaterials 14 00840 g004
Figure 5. Percentage of the mass concentration of nitrogen on the surface of Arabic gum, pullulan, Tenebrio molitor hydrolysate, and the produced nano-microcapsules. Different letters denote significant differences between samples (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 5. Percentage of the mass concentration of nitrogen on the surface of Arabic gum, pullulan, Tenebrio molitor hydrolysate, and the produced nano-microcapsules. Different letters denote significant differences between samples (p ≤ 0.05).
Nanomaterials 14 00840 g005
Figure 6. DPP-IV-inhibitory activity represented by the IC50 values for the Tenebrio molitor hydrolysate and the different encapsulates. Values are presented as the mean of three replicates ± standard deviation. Different letters denote significant differences between samples (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 6. DPP-IV-inhibitory activity represented by the IC50 values for the Tenebrio molitor hydrolysate and the different encapsulates. Values are presented as the mean of three replicates ± standard deviation. Different letters denote significant differences between samples (p ≤ 0.05).
Nanomaterials 14 00840 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Berraquero-García, C.; Martínez-Sánchez, L.; Guadix, E.M.; García-Moreno, P.J. Encapsulation of Tenebrio molitor Hydrolysate with DPP-IV Inhibitory Activity by Electrospraying and Spray-Drying. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 840. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14100840

AMA Style

Berraquero-García C, Martínez-Sánchez L, Guadix EM, García-Moreno PJ. Encapsulation of Tenebrio molitor Hydrolysate with DPP-IV Inhibitory Activity by Electrospraying and Spray-Drying. Nanomaterials. 2024; 14(10):840. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14100840

Chicago/Turabian Style

Berraquero-García, Carmen, Lydia Martínez-Sánchez, Emilia M. Guadix, and Pedro J. García-Moreno. 2024. "Encapsulation of Tenebrio molitor Hydrolysate with DPP-IV Inhibitory Activity by Electrospraying and Spray-Drying" Nanomaterials 14, no. 10: 840. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14100840

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop