Next Article in Journal
Green and Sustainable Manufacture of Ultrapure Engineered Nanomaterials
Next Article in Special Issue
High-Efficiency, Broadband, Near Diffraction-Limited, Dielectric Metalens in Ultraviolet Spectrum
Previous Article in Journal
Visible-Light-Excited Room Temperature Phosphorescent Carbon Dots
Previous Article in Special Issue
Generation of Flat Top Surface Plasmon Polariton Beams by Near Field Holography
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 10
Issue 3
10.3390/nano10030462
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ultraviolet Photoactivated Room Temperature NO2 Gas Sensor of ZnO Hemitubes and Nanotubes Covered with TiO2 Nanoparticles

by
Hee-Jung Choi
1,
Soon-Hwan Kwon
1,
Won-Seok Lee
1,
Kwang-Gyun Im
2,
Tae-Hyun Kim
1,
Beom-Rae Noh
1,
Sunghoon Park
3,
Semi Oh
4,* and
Kyoung-Kook Kim
1,2,*
1
Department of Advanced Convergence Technology, and Research Institute of Advanced Convergence Technology, Korea Polytechnic University, 237 Sangidaehak-ro, Siheung-si 15073, Korea
2
Department of Nano & Semiconductor engineering, Korea Polytechnic University, 237 Sangidaehak-ro, Siheung-si 15073, Korea
3
Department of Software Convergence, and 1101B Gwanggeto-Bd, Sejong University, Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05006, Korea
4
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, 1301 Beal Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(3), 462; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10030462
Submission received: 31 January 2020 / Revised: 2 March 2020 / Accepted: 3 March 2020 / Published: 4 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanophotonics and Its Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Prolonged exposure to NO2 can cause lung tissue inflammation, bronchiolitis fibrosa obliterans, and silo filler’s disease. In recent years, nanostructured semiconducting metal oxides have been widely used to fabricate gas sensors because of their unique structure and surface-to-volume ratio compared to layered materials. In particular, the different morphologies of ZnO-based nanostructures significantly affect the detection property of NO2 gas sensors. However, because of the large interaction energy of chemisorption (1–10 eV), metal oxide-based gas sensors are typically operated above 100 °C, overcoming the energy limits to attain high sensitivity and fast reaction. High operating temperature negatively affects the reliability and durability of semiconductor-based sensors; at high temperature, the diffusion and sintering effects at the metal oxide grain boundaries are major factors causing undesirable long-term drift problems and preventing stability improvements. Therefore, we demonstrate NO2 gas sensors consisting of ZnO hemitubes (HTs) and nanotubes (NTs) covered with TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs). To operate the gas sensor at room temperature (RT), we measured the gas-sensing properties with ultraviolet illumination onto the active region of the gas sensor for photoactivation instead of conventional thermal activation by heating. The performance of these gas sensors was enhanced by the change of barrier potential at the ZnO/TiO2 interfaces, and their depletion layer was expanded by the NPs formation. The gas sensor based on ZnO HTs showed 1.2 times higher detection property than those consisting of ZnO NTs at the 25 ppm NO2 gas.

1. Introduction

NO2 is a pungent red-brown oxidizing gas that is released into the atmosphere from both natural sources and human activities. Prolonged exposure to this gas can cause lung tissue inflammation, bronchiolitis fibrosa obliterans, and silo filler’s disease. In plants, exposure to several ppm of NO2 results in inadequate chlorophyll synthesis, causing chlorosis and other plant tissue breakdowns. Furthermore, NO2 emitted by supersonic jets causes the destruction of the ozone layer present in the stratosphere, which absorbs the harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation coming from the sun [1,2,3].
In recent years, nanostructured semiconducting metal oxides such as SnO2, ZnO, TiO2, and CuO have been widely used to fabricate gas sensors because of their unique structure and surface-to-volume ratio compared to layered materials [4,5,6]. Among them, ZnO is largely utilized for the realization of various nanostructures, including nanorods (NRs), nanotubes (NTs), nanowires (NWs), nanowalls, and nanoflowers [7,8,9,10]. In particular, the different morphologies of ZnO NRs significantly affect the detection property of NO2 gas sensors [11]; moreover, ZnO NRs-based sensors have a very low detection limit (10 ppm) for NO2 gas at 250 °C, along with short response and recovery times [12]. TiO2 is another very promising material for NO2 gas detection because of its high temperature stability, harsh environment tolerance, and catalytic properties [13]. Therefore, combined ZnO/TiO2 nanostructures can achieve better physical and chemical properties than of the corresponding individual ones because of the modification of their electronic states [14,15].
The quality of a metal oxide-based gas sensor is represented by its sensitivity, selectivity, and stability. Adding a second component can easily improve both sensitivity and selectivity; however, without an effective solution, stability is still limited [16]. The working principle of these gas sensors is based on the surface chemical reactions that interfere with the free carrier density of their constituent metal oxide. This allows the detection of changes in the surrounding environment by measuring the electrical characteristics of the sensor. As a result of the large interaction energy of chemisorption (1–10 eV), metal oxide-based gas sensors are typically operated above 100 °C, overcoming the energy limits to attain high sensitivity and fast reaction [17]. However, high operating temperature negatively affects the reliability and durability of semiconductor-based sensors; at high temperature, the diffusion and sintering effects at the metal oxide grain boundaries are major factors causing undesirable long-term drift problems and preventing stability improvements [18].
In this study, we fabricated gas sensors consisting of ZnO hemitubes (HTs) and NTs covered with TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) to achieve a high response and quick response/recovery times for NO2 gas detection. The oxygen-related gas-sensing mechanism involves the absorption of oxygen molecules on the oxide surface to generate chemisorbed oxygen species (O2−, O2−, O−) by capturing electrons from the conductance band of semiconductor material, making the oxide surface highly resistive. The oxide is exposed to the traces of the introduced reductive gas. In reacting with the oxygen species at the oxide surface, the reductive gas reduces the concentration of oxygen species at this surface and thereby increases the electron concentration [19]. Therefore, ZnO NTs are able to provide large sensitivity because of their large length-to-diameter ratio and surface-to-volume ratio than other nanostructures. There are several methods to realize ZnO NTs such as the temperature change etching process, wet chemical etching process, and removing some materials by heating [9,13,20]. We fabricated the ZnO tube shapes by ZnO deposition thickness on the polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) NWs and removing PVP NWs. In addition, to solve the problem of sensing material stability at high temperature and obtain high energy efficiency, we used the UV emitter (365 nm) for photoactivation rather than a high-temperature heating process for increasing NO2 gas detection at room temperature (RT).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. PVP NWs

A 300 nm SiO2 insulating layer was deposited on a Si substrate by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Then, PVP NWs were synthesized by electrospinning onto the substrate. The electrospinning solution was obtained by mixing ethanol (2.5 mL), dimethylformamide (2.5 mL), and PVP (0.75 g). Subsequently, it was blended by dissolving PVP in the solvent under stirring at 60 °C for 12 h. The PVP solution was placed in a glass syringe equipped with a 21-gauge stainless steel needle; the distance between the needle tip and an Al flat-plate collector was fixed at 20 cm. A positive voltage of 18 kV was applied to the needle, while the collector was grounded. At the same time, an additional negative voltage of 15 kV was applied to the Al plate to accelerate the electrospinning process. The solution feed rate was adjusted at 0.01 mL/min and kept constant by a syringe pump. The as-obtained PVP NWs were uniformly distributed onto the substrate, which was placed on the Al metal collector. A ring-type collector was tested to fabricate NWs in a random network form.

2.2. Gas Sensor Materials Fabrication

Figure 1 shows the fabrication procedure of ZnO HTs and ZnO NTs covered with a TiO2 NPs gas sensor. To evaluate the influence of the ZnO layer thickness on the structural and sensing property, the 30 nm and 100 nm ZnO layers were deposited on the PVP NWs through radio-frequency sputtering. The base pressure and working pressure for the ZnO deposition were 2.0 × 10-7 Torr and 3 mTorr, respectively, in argon ambient at a sputtering power of 60 W and a deposition rate of 0.0625 nm/sec. To fabricate TiO2 NPs, a 10 nm Ti layer was deposited onto the ZnO layers by an electron-beam evaporator; the base pressure was 1.0 × 10-7 Torr, the power was 5.0%, and the deposition rate was 0.2 Å/sec. To remove the PVP NWs and form TiO2 NPs, the annealing process on the samples was performed at 800 °C in O2 ambient for 1 h. By removing the PVP NWs as high-temperature heat, ZnO HTs and NTs were self-formed, and the Ti layer was turned into TiO2 NPs by agglomeration on the ZnO surface.

2.3. Gas Sensor Materials Characterization

The morphological and structural properties of the synthesized samples were characterized by using a field emission-scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) (Hitachi S-4300, Hitachi Ltd., TYO, JP) and a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (JEOL 2100F, JEOL Ltd., TYO, JP) operated at 10 kV and 300 kV, respectively. In addition, elemental mapping was conducted with an energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) (Oxford Inca x-sight, Oxford Instruments Inc., Oxon, UK).

2.4. Gas Sensor Characterization

We fabricated interdigital electrodes (IDEs) consisting of 200 nm Ti and 100 nm Au layers, with a gap of 50 mm on the multiple network ZnO HTs and NTs covered with TiO2 NPs gas sensors (total device size: 6.5 × 5 mm2, one electrode pad size: 3 x 5 mm2). The sensor response to NO2 was measured by a PXI chassis system (NI PXIe-1073, National Instruments Inc., Austin, TX, USA). The system chamber was connected to the gas inlet line coming from the mass flow controllers; two mass flow controllers for NO2 and air gases were used to control the NO2 gas flow rate. A gas exhaust tube was located on the opposite side of the chamber. All the measurements were performed in a closed chamber with the relative humidity (RH) of 50 ± 20% and the temperature of 20.0 ± 10.0 °C (RT), which was maintained at the same humidity and temperature with the normal indoor condition. The electrical resistance of the sensor devices was measured by a source meter (Keithley 2400, Keithley Instruments Inc., Solon, OH, USA) in constant-current operation using a computer-controlled measurement system with the UV illumination (approximately 2.0 W) [21,22]. A custom written LabView program was used, which allowed temperatures and gas-flow rates to be automatically controlled by a computer. Then, we derived the sensor response R as R ( % ) = R g / R a × 100 , where R a is the resistance of the sensor in ambient air, and R g is its resistance under NO2 gas.

3. Results

Figure 2a,c shows the FE-SEM images of PVP NWs covered with the 30 nm and 100 nm ZnO layer/10 nm Ti layer, respectively. After an 800 °C annealing process, the ZnO HTs (Figure 2b) and NTs (Figure 2d) were obtained; the agglomeration of TiO2 NPs occurred because of the atomic migration effect. In addition, the surface area of both ZnO HTs and NTs increased almost two times compared to that of the ZnO layer on the PVP NWs. The average diameters of the PVP NWs covered with 30 nm and 100 nm ZnO layers were 800 nm and 1 μm, respectively, as shown in Figure 2a’,c’. After the annealing process, the average diameters of ZnO HTs and NTs shrank such as Figure 2b’,d’ because of the PVP NWs removal.
To further investigate the structure properties of ZnO HTs and NTs covered with TiO2 NPs, TEM and EDS were measured and analyzed. Figure 3a,a’ and b,b’ show the low-magnification bright field (BF) TEM images of ZnO HT and NT. Figure 3a’’,b’’ show the high-resolution TEM images of dotted red rectangular region in the BF TEM images of Figure 3a’,b’. As shown in these TEM images, the TiO2 NPs were covered with the ZnO HT and NT. The corresponding selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern in Figure 3c indicated that synthesized nanostructures have polycrystalline crystal structures. Several ring patterns with different diameters were observed, revealing that the nanostructure comprises a polycrystalline structure of ZnO (002), (220) planes, and TiO2 NPs corresponding to the (211).
Figure 4 illustrates the results of the elemental line scanning and mapping measurements of TEM-EDS. The well-defined spatial distributions of O, Zn, and Ti elements in the layers of ZnO HT and NT covered with TiO2 NPs were observed as shown in Figure 4a–h. Through the result of EDS analysis, we can confirm that the calculated weight and molar values were predicted to the difference of ZnO layer thickness, as shown in Table 1.
Figure 5 shows the schematic diagram of the possible gas-sensing mechanism of the photoactivated ZnO NTs covered with a TiO2 NPs gas sensor. The band bending occurs at the interface between ZnO and TiO2. The released photoactivated electrons will flow into the conduction band of the ZnO and TiO2 semiconductor because of the higher work function of ZnO (5.3 eV) compared to TiO2 (4.2 eV), changing the width and height of the barrier potential at the interfaces, as shown in Figure 5a [23,24,25]. In addition, the width and height of the barrier potential further lower when the UV emitter is illuminated to the active materials of the gas sensor. The remarkable enhancement in the response by UV photoactivated is attributed to the increased change in resistance. Therefore, the change in the ZnO/TiO2 interface barrier by UV photoactivation can further contribute to the enhanced NO2 gas detection property.
While the sensor detects gas, the detection process of the sensor is divided into adsorption, reaction, and desorption. The sensing mechanism is influenced by the presence of NPs. Since the formation of NPs expanded the depletion layer, the sensing area became large, as shown in Figure 5b,c. Accordingly, the number of electrons that can react with the gas is increased, and the trapped oxygen ions are also increased. Furthermore, UV illumination to the active materials of the gas sensor produces more photoadsorbed oxygen ions. Normally, when air enters the metal oxide semiconductor, oxygen is adsorbed as molecules at low temperature or as the atomic form (O2- and O-) at high temperature [24]. The thermal energy at high temperature, which is the cause of the activated oxygen ions, is replaced by the photon energy of the UV emitter. Photon energy can increase the number of charge carriers in the conduction band, improving the surface chemical activity and providing more active areas on the surface (Figure 5d) [26,27]. The larger the surface area, the greater the probability that the gas can react. Gas reactions can be rapidly carried out over large areas (Figure 5e). When the gas injection is completed and the air is injected again, both the reacted gas and oxygen ions are desorbed as shown in Figure 5f.
Figure 6a,d and a’,d’ show the low- and high-magnification confocal microscopy images of the fabricated gas sensors, revealing the multiple network ZnO HTs and NTs covered with TiO2 NPs. Compared to Figure 6a’ of ZnO HTs with a TiO2 NPs gas sensor, the ZnO NTs with a TiO2 NPs gas sensor exhibited a higher density of ZnO structures than the ZnO HTs, as shown in Figure 6d’. Accordingly, the resistance of gas sensors could be detected by the multiple network semiconductor materials.
The resistance variations of the photoactivated RT gas sensors by a UV emitter in response to different NO2 gas concentrations are plotted in Figure 6b,e. Sensitivity variations as RH are an important factor in gas sensors; however, it is also very important for a stable NO2 gas detection as gas concentrations in normal indoor conditions, repeatedly, as these provided references [28,29,30,31].
ZnO HTs covered with a TiO2 NPs gas sensor showed responses of approximately 105%, 108%, 123%, and 116% for 5, 10, 25, and 50 ppm of NO2 gas, respectively. While the corresponding response of ZnO NTs covered with a TiO2 NPs gas sensor was 104%, 105%, 106%, and 105%, respectively. In Figure 6b,e, the sensitivity changed along with the NO2 gas concentrations. A gas sensor fabricated with ZnO NTs had relatively low sensitivity than a gas sensor consisting of ZnO HTs.
This difference can be attributed to the two following reasons. First, ZnO HTs are the structures that the oxygen ions can more easily adsorption and desorption. It means the ZnO HTs have higher oxygen vacancy-related defects than ZnO NTs that are able to generate more active sites for gas molecules, resulting in higher gas sensitivity [32,33,34]. Second, the semiconductor wall thickness is related to the sensitivity of the depletion region [35]. The improvement of sensor response can be attributed to the increase in the depletion layer. In other words, the thinner wall thickness of ZnO HT than NT has a larger depletion layer and higher sensitivity. Accordingly, the gas sensor fabricated with ZnO HTs with TiO2 NPs showed better detection results of 1.2 times than the gas sensor consisting of ZnO NTs with TiO2 NPs for 25 ppm of NO2 gas. This result is relatively similar and has a higher value compared to other ZnO-based RT gas sensors for NO2 gas detection [28,36,37].
To confirm the sensing properties of ZnO HTs and NTs gas sensors, the resistance of gas sensors with 25 ppm NO2 gas is shown in Figure 6c–f. In Figure 6c, we confirmed that the response and recovery time of gas sensors fabricated with ZnO HTs covered with TiO2 NPs were 27 and 132 s. Figure 6f shows the response and recovery time of ZnO NTs covered with a TiO2 NPs gas sensor were correspondingly 19 and 191 s. However, the gas sensors did not show any resistance variation at RT without UV illumination. The response time of ZnO HTs covered with TiO2 NPs gas sensor is more rapid than that of ZnO NTs covered with TiO2 NPs gas sensor, but the recovery speed was reduced. The high surface area and low density of the grain boundaries are the best way to improve the sensitivity of gas sensors [38], which exhibited a dramatic improvement in sensing time for NO2 gas. A high density of ZnO NTs could affect the response and recovery time because the influence of intergrain boundaries on the sensor response resistance could become stronger than that of the contact resistance [39,40]. Therefore, the gas sensor with a low density of ZnO HTs could achieve better gas-sensing performance compared to the gas sensor with ZnO NTs. Table 2 clearly shows the sensing properties of gas sensors as gas concentrations. It shows the gas sensor consisted of ZnO HTs has higher gas sensitivity related to gas concentrations than ZnO NTs.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we fabricated the RT gas sensor for NO2 gas detection by ZnO HTs and NTs covered with TiO2 NPs by synthesized PVP NWs and ZnO/Ti deposition. The ZnO NTs are able to provide high sensitivity because of their large length-to-diameter ratio and surface-to-volume ratio compared with the other nanostructures. The tube morphology of ZnO HTs and NTs was controlled by the ZnO deposition thickness. In addition, to solve the problem of sensing material stability at high temperature and obtain high energy efficiency, we measured the gas-sensing properties with UV illumination onto the active region of the gas sensor for photoactivation instead of conventional thermal activation by heating. All the measurements were repeatedly performed in a closed chamber with the RH of 50 ± 20% and the temperature of 20.0 ± 10.0 °C (RT), which was maintained at the same humidity and temperature with the normal indoor condition. Sensitivity variations as humidity are an important factor in gas sensors; however, it is also very important for stable NO2 gas detection as gas concentrations in normal indoor conditions, repeatedly. Therefore, it will be the aim of future works to determine the RH sensitivity of the sensors to quantify their cross-sensitivity. The width and height of the barrier potential further lower when the UV emitter is illuminated to the active materials of the gas sensor. The remarkable enhancement in the response by UV photoactivation is attributed to the increased change in resistance. In addition, the bended potential barrier between ZnO and TiO2 can contribute to the improvement of the NO2 gas-sensing properties. Furthermore, the expansion of the depletion region by the TiO2 NPs further improved the gas sensitivity. The gas sensor fabricated with ZnO HTs covered with TiO2 NPs showed better detection results that were about 1.2 times that of the gas sensor consisting of ZnO NTs with TiO2 NPs at the 25 ppm NO2 gas. It is because of the thinner and broader depletion region of ZnO HTs compared to the ZnO NTs that higher adsorption and desorption reactions occurred. The ZnO NTs density of the gas sensor could affect the response and recovery time because the influence of intergrain boundary resistance could become stronger than the influence of contact resistance in the sensor. As a result, the detection time of the lower density ZnO HTs was more rapid than that of the higher density ZnO NTs. Therefore, ZnO HTs covered with a TiO2 NPs gas sensor can be considered an optimized gas sensor for RT applications. The methodology proposed in this study could be applicable to methods to fabricate RT-operating gas sensors.

Author Contributions

H.-J.C., S.P., and K.-K.K. conceived and designed the experiments; S.-H.K., W.-S.L., and S.O. conducted the investigation; K.-G.I. and T.-H.K. performed the experiments and formal analysis; H.-J.C., S.-H.K., W.-S.L., and B.-R.N. analyzed the data; H.-J.C. and S.O. wrote the paper; S.O. and K.-K.K. wrote the review and editing; K.-K.K. contributed the supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT), under the Information Technology Research Center (ITRC) support program (IITP-2020-2019-2018-0-01426) supervised by the Institute for Information & Communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP), Development of HighCapacity Transfer of NanoHole Air Adsorption for UHD MicroLED Display (20004550), and the Technology Innovation Program (20002694, Gas sensor) funded by the Ministry of Trade.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kumar, R.; Al-Dossary, O.; Kumar, G.; Umar, A. Zinc Oxide Nanostructures for NO2 Gas-Sensor Applications: A Review. Nano-Micro Lett. 2015, 7, 97–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Schumann, U. The impact of nitrogen oxides emissions from aircraft upon the atmosphere at flight altitudes-Results from the aeronox project. Atmos. Environ. 1997, 31, 1723–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Persinger, R.L.; Blay, W.M.; Heintz, N.H.; Hemenway, D.R.; Janssen-Heininger, Y.M.W. Nitrogen dioxide induces death in lung epithelial cells in a density-dependent manner. Am. J. Resp. Cell Mol. 2001, 24, 583–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. El-Maghraby, E.M.; Qurashi, A.; Yamazaki, T. Synthesis of SnO2 nanowires their structural and H2 gas sensing properties. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 8475–8480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, Z.L. Zinc oxide nanostructures: Growth, properties and applications. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2004, 16, R829–R858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Choi, S.-W.; Katoch, A.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, S.S. A novel approach to improving oxidizing-gas sensing ability of p-CuO nanowires using biased radial modulation of a hole-accumulation layer. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 8911–8917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, Z.L. Nanostructures of zinc oxide. Mater. Today 2004, 7, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kim, K.-K.; Lee, S.-D.; Kim, H.; Park, J.-C.; Lee, S.-N.; Park, Y.; Park, S.-J.; Kim, S.-W. Enhanced light extraction efficiency of GaN-based light-emitting diodes with ZnO nanorod arrays grown using aqueous solution. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 071118. [Google Scholar]
  9. Oh, S.; Ha, K.; Kang, S.-H.; Yohn, G.-J.; Lee, H.-J.; Park, S.-J.; Kim, K.-K. Self-standing ZnO nanotube/SiO2 core-shell arrays for high photon extraction efficiency in III-nitride emitter. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 015301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Oh, S.; Kim, S.; Shin, S.-C.; Su, P.-C.; Yoon, Y.-J.; Lee, K.J.; Kim, S.-J.; Choi, H.; Park, S.-J.; Kim, K.-K. Morphology effect of the ZnO surface via organic etchants for photon extraction in III-nitride emitters. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2017, 6, Q13–Q17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Shouli, B.; Liangyuan, C.; Dianqing, L.; Wensheng, Y.; Pengcheng, Y.; Zhiyong, L.; Aifan, C.; Liu, C.C. Different morphologies of ZnO nanorods and their sensing property. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2010, 146, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Oh, E.; Choi, H.-Y.; Jung, S.-H.; Cho, S.; Kim, J.C.; Lee, K.-H.; Kang, S.-W.; Kim, J.; Yun, J.-Y.; Jeong, S.-H. High-performance NO2 gas sensor based on ZnO nanorod grown by ultrasonic irradiation. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2009, 141, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, Y.; Wu, T.; Zhou, Y.; Meng, C.; Zhu, W.; Liu, L. TiO2-based nanoheterostructures for promoting gas sensitivity performance: Designs, developments, and prospects. Sensors 2017, 17, 1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Li, Y.; Xie, W.; Hu, X.; Shen, G.; Zhou, X.; Xiang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Fang, P. Comparison of dye photodegradation and its coupling with light-to-electricity conversion over TiO2 and ZnO. Langmuir 2010, 26, 591–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Deng, J.; Yu, B.; Lou, Z.; Wang, L.; Wang, R.; Zhang, T. Facile synthesis and enhanced ethanol sensing properties of the brush-like ZnO-TiO2 heterojunctions nanofibers. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 184, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Korotcenkov, G. Gas response control through structural and chemical modification of metal oxide films: State of the art and approaches. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2005, 107, 209–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Henrich, V.E.; Cox, P.A. The Surface Science of Metal Oxides; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1994; pp. 1–95. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fan, S.-W.; Srivastava, A.K.; Dravid, V.P. UV-activated room-temperature gas sensing mechanism of polycrystalline ZnO. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 142106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mitra, P.; Chatterjee, A.P.; Maiti, H.S. ZnO thin film sensor. Mater. Lett. 1998, 35, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hsueh, T.-J.; Chang, S.-J.; Hsu, C.-L.; Lin, Y.-R.; Chen, I.-C. ZnO Nanotube Ethanol Gas Sensors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2008, 155, K152–K155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Davydova, M.; Laposa, A.; Smarhak, J.; Kromka, A.; Neykova, N.; Nahlik, J.; Kroutil, J.; Drahokoupil, J.; Voves, J. Gas-sensing behavior of ZnO/diamond nanostructures. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kilinc, N.; Cakmak, O.; Kosemen, A.; Ermek, E.; Ozturk, S.; Yerli, Y.; Ozturk, Z.Z.; Urey, H. Fabrication of 1D ZnO nanostructures on MEMS cantilever for VOC sensor application. Sens. Actuators B: Chem. 2014, 202, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, Y.-J.; Xiao, G.; Wang, T.-S.; Zhang, F.; Ma, Y.; Gao, P.; Zhu, C.-L.; Zhang, E.; Li, Q.-H. Synthesis and enhanced gas sensing properties of crystalline CeO2/TiO2 core/shell nanorods. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 156, 867–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zou, C.W.; Wang, J.; Xie, W. Synthesis and enhanced NO2 gas sensing properties of ZnO nanorods/TiO2 nanoparticles heterojunction composites. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 478, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Park, S.; An, S.; Ko, H.; Lee, S.; Lee, C. Synthesis, structure, and UV-enhanced gas sensing properties of Au-functionalized ZnS nanowires. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 188, 1270–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Trinh, T.T.; Tu, N.H.; Le, H.H.; Ryu, K.Y.; Le, K.B.; Pillai, K.; Yi, J. Improving the ethanol sensing of ZnO nano-particle thin films-the correlation between the grain size and the sensing mechanism. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 152, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Seiyama, T.; Fujiishi, K.; Nagatani, M.; Kato, A. A New Detector for Gaseous Components Using Zinc Oxide Thin Films. Anal. Chem. 1962, 34, 1502–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Park, S.; An, S.; Mun, Y.; Lee, C. UV-enhanced NO2 gas sensing properties of SnO2-Core/ZnO-shell nanowires at room temperature. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 4285–4292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Liu, S.; Yu, B.; Zhang, H.; Fei, T.; Zhang, T. Enhancing NO2 gas sensing performances at room temperature based on reduced graphene oxide-ZnO nanoparticles hybrids. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 202, 272–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Park, S.; Kim, S.; Ko, H.; Lee, C. Light-enhanced gas sensing of ZnS-core/ZnO-shell nanowires at room temperature. J. Electroceramics 2014, 33, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhu, L.; Zeng, W. Room-temperature gas sensing of ZnO-based gas sensor: A review. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2017, 267, 242–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ahn, M.-W.; Park, K.-S.; Heo, J.-H.; Park, J.-G.; Kim, D.-W.; Choi, K.J.; Lee, J.-H.; Hong, S.-H. Gas sensing properties of defect-controlled ZnO-nanowire gas sensor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 263103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yu, Q.; Yu, C.; Wang, J.; Guo, F.; Gao, S.; Jiao, S.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X.; Gao, H.; et al. Gas sensing properties of self-assembled ZnO nanotube bundles. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 16619–16625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cho, S.; Kim, D.-H.; Lee, B.-S.; Jung, J.; Yu, W.-R.; Hong, S.-H.; Lee, S. Ethanol sensors based on ZnO nanotubes with controllable wall thickness via atomic layer deposition, an O2 plasma process and an annealing process. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 162, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Korotcenkov, G. The role of morphology and crystallographic structure of metal oxides in response of conductometric-type gas sensors. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2008, 61, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Geng, X.; Zhang, C.; Debliquy, M. Cadmium sulfide activated zinc oxide coatings deposited by liquid plasma spray for room temperature nitrogen dioxide detection under visible light illumination. Ceram. Int. 2015, 42, 4845–4852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Geng, X.; You, J.; Zhang, C. Microstructure and sensing properties of CdS-ZnO1-x coatings deposited by liquid plasma spray and treated with hydrogen peroxide solution for nitrogen dioxide detection at room temperature. J. Alloy. Compd. 2016, 687, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shaalan, N.M.; Yamazaki, T.; Kikuta, T. Influence of morphology and structure geometry on NO2 gas-sensing characteristics of SnO2 nanostructures synthesized via a thermal evaporation method. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 153, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hwang, I.-S.; Kim, Y.-S.; Kim, S.-J.; Ju, B.-K.; Lee, J.-H. A facile fabrication of semiconductor nanowires gas sensor using PDMS patterning and solution deposition. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2009, 136, 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. An, W.; Wu, X.; Zeng, X.C. Adsorption of O2, H2, CO, NH3, and NO2 on ZnO Nanotube: A Density Functional Theory study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 5747–5755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 10 00462 g001 550
Figure 1. Fabrication procedure for gas sensors consisting of ZnO hemitubes (HTs) and nanotubes (NTs) covered with TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs).
Figure 1. Fabrication procedure for gas sensors consisting of ZnO hemitubes (HTs) and nanotubes (NTs) covered with TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs).
Nanomaterials 10 00462 g001
Nanomaterials 10 00462 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) FE-SEM image of 30 nm ZnO layer with 10 nm Ti layer (before annealing) on the polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) nanowires (NWs), (b) ZnO HTs and NTs covered with TiO2 NPs (after annealing), (c) FE-SEM image of 100 nm ZnO layer with 10 nm Ti layer (before annealing) on the PVP NWs, and (d) ZnO HTs and NTs covered with TiO2 NPs (after annealing). (a’)–(d’) and (a’’)–(d’’). High magnification images of (a)–(d).
Figure 2. (a) FE-SEM image of 30 nm ZnO layer with 10 nm Ti layer (before annealing) on the polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) nanowires (NWs), (b) ZnO HTs and NTs covered with TiO2 NPs (after annealing), (c) FE-SEM image of 100 nm ZnO layer with 10 nm Ti layer (before annealing) on the PVP NWs, and (d) ZnO HTs and NTs covered with TiO2 NPs (after annealing). (a’)–(d’) and (a’’)–(d’’). High magnification images of (a)–(d).
Nanomaterials 10 00462 g002
Nanomaterials 10 00462 g003 550
Figure 3. (a), (a’), (b), and (b’) Low-magnification bright field (BF) TEM images of ZnO HTs and NTs covered with TiO2 NPs. (a’’) and (b’’) High-resolution TEM images of dotted red rectangular region in the magnified BF TEM images of (a’) and (b’). (c) Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of the ZnO NT covered with TiO2 NPs.
Figure 3. (a), (a’), (b), and (b’) Low-magnification bright field (BF) TEM images of ZnO HTs and NTs covered with TiO2 NPs. (a’’) and (b’’) High-resolution TEM images of dotted red rectangular region in the magnified BF TEM images of (a’) and (b’). (c) Selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of the ZnO NT covered with TiO2 NPs.
Nanomaterials 10 00462 g003
Nanomaterials 10 00462 g004 550
Figure 4. TEM-energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) elemental maps for Zn, Ti, and O in (a)–(d) ZnO HT and (e)–(h) NT covered with TiO2 NPs.
Figure 4. TEM-energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) elemental maps for Zn, Ti, and O in (a)–(d) ZnO HT and (e)–(h) NT covered with TiO2 NPs.
Nanomaterials 10 00462 g004
Nanomaterials 10 00462 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Ideal band structure and electron transfer for ZnO and TiO2. (b)-(f) Schematic diagram of possible gas-sensing mechanism of photoactivated ZnO NTs covered with a TiO2 NPs gas sensor.
Figure 5. (a) Ideal band structure and electron transfer for ZnO and TiO2. (b)-(f) Schematic diagram of possible gas-sensing mechanism of photoactivated ZnO NTs covered with a TiO2 NPs gas sensor.
Nanomaterials 10 00462 g005
Nanomaterials 10 00462 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Confocal microscopy image of gas sensor consisting of ZnO HTs covered with TiO2 NPs, (a’) high-magnification image, (b) resistance of ZnO HTs covered with TiO2 NPs gas sensor in response to different NO2 concentrations with and without UV illumination, (c) resistance of ZnO HTs covered with TiO2 NPs gas sensor to 25 ppm of NO2, (d) Confocal microscopy image of gas sensor consisting of ZnO NTs covered with TiO2 NPs, (d’) high-magnification image, (e) resistance of ZnO NTs covered with TiO2 NPs gas sensor in response to different NO2 concentrations with and without UV illumination, and (f) resistance of ZnO NTs covered with TiO2 NPs gas sensor to 25 ppm of NO2
Figure 6. (a) Confocal microscopy image of gas sensor consisting of ZnO HTs covered with TiO2 NPs, (a’) high-magnification image, (b) resistance of ZnO HTs covered with TiO2 NPs gas sensor in response to different NO2 concentrations with and without UV illumination, (c) resistance of ZnO HTs covered with TiO2 NPs gas sensor to 25 ppm of NO2, (d) Confocal microscopy image of gas sensor consisting of ZnO NTs covered with TiO2 NPs, (d’) high-magnification image, (e) resistance of ZnO NTs covered with TiO2 NPs gas sensor in response to different NO2 concentrations with and without UV illumination, and (f) resistance of ZnO NTs covered with TiO2 NPs gas sensor to 25 ppm of NO2
Nanomaterials 10 00462 g006
Table
Table 1. Weight and atomic values of a ZnO HT and a ZnO NT covered with TiO2 NPs.
Table 1. Weight and atomic values of a ZnO HT and a ZnO NT covered with TiO2 NPs.
ElementZnO HT Covered with TiO2 NPsZnO NT Covered with TiO2 NPs
Weight (%)Atomic (%)Weight (%)Atomic (%)
O53.9681.3538.2570.81
Ti12.306.195.002.97
Zn33.7512.4656.7526.22
Totals100.00100.00100.00100.00
Table
Table 2. Gas-sensing properties of ZnO HTs and ZnO NTs covered with TiO2 NPs gas sensors as gas concentrations.
Table 2. Gas-sensing properties of ZnO HTs and ZnO NTs covered with TiO2 NPs gas sensors as gas concentrations.
Gas-sensing materialsNO2 concentration (ppm)Response (%)Response time (s)Recovery time (s)
ZnO HTs covered with TiO2 NPs510526224
1010843139
2512327132
5011659> 300
ZnO NTs covered with TiO2 NPs510436271
1010518155
2510619191
5010511> 300

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choi, H.-J.; Kwon, S.-H.; Lee, W.-S.; Im, K.-G.; Kim, T.-H.; Noh, B.-R.; Park, S.; Oh, S.; Kim, K.-K. Ultraviolet Photoactivated Room Temperature NO2 Gas Sensor of ZnO Hemitubes and Nanotubes Covered with TiO2 Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 462. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10030462

AMA Style

Choi H-J, Kwon S-H, Lee W-S, Im K-G, Kim T-H, Noh B-R, Park S, Oh S, Kim K-K. Ultraviolet Photoactivated Room Temperature NO2 Gas Sensor of ZnO Hemitubes and Nanotubes Covered with TiO2 Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(3):462. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10030462

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choi, Hee-Jung, Soon-Hwan Kwon, Won-Seok Lee, Kwang-Gyun Im, Tae-Hyun Kim, Beom-Rae Noh, Sunghoon Park, Semi Oh, and Kyoung-Kook Kim. 2020. "Ultraviolet Photoactivated Room Temperature NO2 Gas Sensor of ZnO Hemitubes and Nanotubes Covered with TiO2 Nanoparticles" Nanomaterials 10, no. 3: 462. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10030462

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop