Effect of Various Beverages on Adhesion of Repaired CAD/CAM Restorative Materials
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Material and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- Tea and cola significantly reduced the repair bond strength of RBC to CAD/CAM resin–ceramic hybrid materials.
- Intraoral repair of CAD/CAM resin–ceramic hybrid restorations with RBC provides adequate bond strength regardless of the beverage or CAD/CAM resin–ceramic hybrid material used.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cengiz-Yanardag, E.; Kurtulmus Yilmaz, S.; Karakaya, I.; Ongun, S. Effect of Different Surface Treatment Methods on Micro-Shear Bond Strength of CAD-CAM Restorative Materials to Resin Cement. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2019, 33, 110–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Şişmanoğlu, S.; Gürcan, A.T.; Yildirim-Bilmez, Z.; Turunç-Oğuzman, R.; Gümüştaş, B. Effect of surface treatments and universal adhesive application on the microshear bond strength of CAD/CAM materials. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2020, 12, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bajraktarova-Valjakova, E.; Grozdanov, A.; Guguvcevski, L.; Korunoska-Stevkovska, V.; Kapusevska, B.; Gigovski, N.; Mijoska, A.; Bajraktarova-Misevska, C. Acid etching as surface treatment method for luting of glass-ceramic restorations, part 1: Acids, application protocol and etching effectiveness. Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci. 2018, 6, 568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ludovichetti, F.S.; Trindade, F.Z.; Werner, A.; Kleverlaan, C.J.; Fonseca, R.G. Wear resistance and abrasiveness of CAD-CAM monolithic materials. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2018, 120, 318.e1–318.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mörmann, W.H.; Stawarczyk, B.; Ender, A.; Sener, B.; Attin, T.; Mehl, A. Wear characteristics of current aesthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials: Two-body wear, gloss retention, roughness and Martens hardness. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2013, 20, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alamoush, R.A.; Silikas, N.; Salim, N.A.; Al-Nasrawi, S.; Satterthwaite, J.D. Effect of the composition of CAD/CAM composite blocks on mechanical properties. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 4893143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dirxen, C.; Blunck, U.; Preissner, S. Clinical performance of a new biomimetic double network material. Open Dent. J. 2013, 7, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- He, L.-H.; Swain, M. A novel polymer infiltrated ceramic dental material. Dent. Mater. 2011, 27, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- GC Cerasmart Product Description. Available online: https://www.gc.dental/america/products/digital/cadcam/cerasmart (accessed on 31 May 2023).
- Vita Enamic Technical and Scientific Documentation. Available online: https://www.vita-zahnfabrik.com/en/VITA-ENAMIC-24970,27568.html (accessed on 31 May 2023).
- Lava Ultimate CAD/CAM Restorative Technical Product Profile. Available online: https://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/p/d/b00008161/ (accessed on 31 May 2023).
- Rekow, E.D.; Silva, N.R.F.A.; Coelho, P.G.; Zhang, Y.; Guess, P.; Thompson, V.P. Performance of dental ceramics: Challenges for improvements. J. Dent. Res. 2011, 90, 937–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kimmich, M.; Stappert, C.F.J. Intraoral treatment of veneering porcelain chipping of fixed dental restorations: A review and clinical application. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2013, 144, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Capa, N.; Say, E.C.; Celebi, C.; Casur, A. Microtensile bond strengths of adhesively bonded polymer-based CAD/CAM materials to dentin. Dent. Mater. J. 2019, 38, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schwenter, J.; Schmidli, F.; Weiger, R.; Fischer, J. Adhesive bonding to polymer infiltrated ceramic. Dent. Mater. J. 2016, 35, 796–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Stawarczyk, B.; Basler, T.; Ender, A.; Roos, M.; Özcan, M.; Hämmerle, C. Effect of surface conditioning with airborne-particle abrasion on the tensile strength of polymeric CAD/CAM crowns luted with self-adhesive and conventional resin cements. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2012, 107, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Szalewski, L.; Wójcik, D.; Bogucki, M.; Szkutnik, J.; Różyło-Kalinowska, I. The influence of popular beverages on mechanical properties of composite resins. Materials 2021, 14, 3097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hannig, C.; Hamkens, A.; Becker, K.; Attin, R.; Attin, T. Erosive effects of different acids on bovine enamel: Release of calcium and phosphate in vitro. Arch. Oral Biol. 2005, 50, 541–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahadır, H.S.; Bayraktar, Y. Evaluation of the repair capacities and color stabilities of a resin nanoceramic and hybrid CAD/CAM blocks. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2020, 12, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Demirkol, N.; Ozen, F. Color stability of CAD/CAM materials with colored beverages thermocycling. Ann. Med. Res. 2019, 26, 1721–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shetty, P.; Purayil, T.-P.; Ginjupalli, K.; Pentapati, K.-C. Effect of polishing technique and immersion in beverages on color stability of nanoceramic composites. J. Oral Biol. Craniofacial Res. 2021, 11, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aydın, N.; Karaoğlanoğlu, S.; Oktay, E.A.; Kılıçarslan, M.A. Investigating the color changes on resin-based CAD/CAM Blocks. J. Esthet. Restor. Dent. 2020, 32, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Güngör, M.B.; Nemli, S.K.; Bal, B.T.; Ünver, S.; Doğan, A. Effect of surface treatments on shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to CAD/CAM resin-ceramic hybrid materials. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2016, 8, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Loomans, B.A.C.; Mesko, M.E.; Moraes, R.R.; Ruben, J.; Bronkhorst, E.M.; Pereira-Cenci, T.; Huysmans, M. Effect of different surface treatment techniques on the repair strength of indirect composites. J. Dent. 2017, 59, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Duzyol, M.; Sagsoz, O.; Polat Sagsoz, N.; Akgul, N.; Yildiz, M. The effect of surface treatments on the bond strength between CAD/CAM blocks and composite resin. J. Prosthodont. 2016, 25, 466–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tinastepe, N.; Turkes, E.; Kazazoglu, E. Comparative approach to analyse the effects of different surface treatments on CAD/CAM resin nanoceramics–resin composite repair bond strength. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2018, 32, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Özcan, M.; Valandro, L.F.; Amaral, R.; Leite, F.; Bottino, M.A. Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems. Dent. Mater. 2009, 25, 1477–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wahsh, M.M.; Ghallab, O.H. Influence of different surface treatments on microshear bond strength of repair resin composite to two CAD/CAM esthetic restorative materials. Tanta Dent. J. 2015, 12, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Albero, A.; Pascual, A.; Camps, I.; Grau-Benitez, M. Comparative characterization of a novel cad-cam polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2015, 7, e495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chavali, R.; Nejat, A.H.; Lawson, N.C. Machinability of CAD-CAM materials. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2017, 118, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Celik, C.; Cehreli, B.S.; Bagis, B.; Arhun, N. Microtensile bond strength of composite-to-composite repair with different surface treatments and adhesive systems. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2014, 28, 1264–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elsaka, S.E. Influence of surface treatments on bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic material. Odontology 2016, 104, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wendler, M.; Belli, R.; Panzer, R.; Skibbe, D.; Petschelt, A.; Lohbauer, U. Repair bond strength of aged resin composite after different surface and bonding treatments. Materials 2016, 9, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dérand, P.; Derand, T. Bond strength of luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramics. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2000, 13, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Elsaka, S.E. Repair bond strength of resin composite to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic using different repair systems. Dent. Mater. J. 2015, 34, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Üstün, Ö.; Büyükhatipoğlu, I.K.; Seçilmiş, A. Shear bond strength of repair systems to new CAD/CAM restorative materials. J. Prosthodont. 2018, 27, 748–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonfante, E.A.; Suzuki, M.; Hirata, R.; Bonfante, G.; Fardin, V.P.; Coelho, P.G. Resin composite repair for implant-supported crowns. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2017, 105, 1481–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elsaka, S.E. Bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement: The effect of surface treatments. J. Adhes. Dent. 2014, 16, 531–540. [Google Scholar]
- Özcan, M.; Vallittu, P.K. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent. Mater. 2003, 19, 725–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Moura, D.M.D.; Veríssimo, A.H.; Leite Vila-Nova, T.E.; Calderon, P.S.; Özcan, M.; Assunção Souza, R.O. Which surface treatment promotes higher bond strength for the repair of resin nanoceramics and polymer-infiltrated ceramics? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2022, 128, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Özcan, M.; Volpato, C.A. Surface conditioning protocol for the adhesion of resin-based materials to glassy matrix ceramics: How to condition and why. J. Adhes. Dent. 2015, 17, 292–293. [Google Scholar]
- Demirtag, Z.; Culhaoglu, A.K. Surface roughness of ceramic-resin composites after femtosecond laser irradiation, sandblasting or acid etching and their bond strength with and without silanization to a resin cement. Oper. Dent. 2019, 44, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roeters, J.J. A simple method to protect patient and environment when using sandblasting for intraoral repair. J. Adhes. Dent. 2000, 2, 235–328. [Google Scholar]
- Yildirim, O.; Karaca, O.B. The consumption of tea and coffee in Turkey and emerging new trends. J. Ethn. Foods 2022, 9, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yigit, S.; Yigit, A.M. Responsible sourcing practices in Turkey, the case of food and beverage industry. Ordu Üniversitesi Sos. Bilim. Enstitüsü Sos. Bilim. Araştırmaları Derg. 2016, 6, 463–477. [Google Scholar]
- Gul, P.; Altinok-Uygun, L. Repair bond strength of resin composite to three aged CAD/CAM blocks using different repair systems. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2020, 12, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bayındır, Y.Z.; Koseoğlu, B. Effect of universal adhesives and surface treatments on shear bond strength to hybrid CAD/CAM ceramics. Inter. J. Appl. Dent. Sci. 2020, 6, 500–507. [Google Scholar]
- Sismanoglu, S.; Tugce Gurcan, A.; Yildirim-Bilmez, Z.; Gumustas, B. Mechanical properties and repair bond strength of polymer-based CAD/CAM restorative materials. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2021, 18, 312–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veríssimo, A.H.; Moura, D.M.D.; Dal Piva, A.M.d.O.; Bottino, M.A.; de Almeida, L.d.F.D.; Carreiro, A.d.F.P.; e Souza, R.O.d.A. Effect of different repair methods on the bond strength of resin composite to CAD/CAM materials and microorganisms adhesion: An in situ study. J. Dent. 2020, 93, 103266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emsermann, I.; Eggmann, F.; Krastl, G.; Weiger, R.; Amato, J. Influence of pretreatment methods on the adhesion of composite and polymer infiltrated ceramic cad-cam blocks. J. Adhes. Dent. 2019, 21, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Colombo, M.; Poggio, C.; Lasagna, A.; Chiesa, M.; Scribante, A. Vickers micro-hardness of new restorative CAD/CAM dental materials: Evaluation and comparison after exposure to acidic drink. Materials 2019, 12, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Atsu, S.S.; Kilicarslan, M.A.; Kucukesmen, H.C.; Aka, P.S. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2006, 95, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sirisha, K.; Rambabu, T.; Ravishankar, Y.; Ravikumar, P. Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review-Part II. J. Conserv. Dent. JCD 2014, 17, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tian, T.; Tsoi, J.K.H.; Matinlinna, J.P.; Burrow, M.F. Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials. Dent. Mater. 2014, 30, e147–e162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Material | Batch Number | Type | Composition |
---|---|---|---|
GC Cerasmart (GC Dental Products, Tokyo, Japan) | 2007221 | Resin Nanoceramic | Resin nanoceramic (Bis-MEPP, UDMA, DMA) with 71 wt% silica and barium glass nanoparticles |
Lava Ultimate (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) | N880844 | Resin Nanoceramic | Bis-GMA, UDMA, Bis-EMA, TEGDMA with 80% wt 20-nm silica and 4- to 11-nm zirconia nanoparticles, and zirconia/silica nanoclusters |
Vita Enamic Vita Zahnfabrik (Bad Sackingen, Germany) | 74760 | Hybrid ceramic | UDMA, TEGDMA. Filler: Feldspar ceramic enriched with aluminum oxide, 86% by weight |
G- Multi Primer (GC Dental Products, Tokyo, Japan) | 2101151 | Silane | Silane, MDP, ethanol |
G-Premio Bond (GC Dental Products, Tokyo, Japan) | 2011181 | Universal adhesive | MDP, 4-MET, MEPS, methacrylate monomer, acetone, water, initiators, silica |
GC Essentia Universal (GC Dental Products, Tokyo, Japan) | 200915A | Ultrafine hybrid | BisEMA (10–25 wt%), TEGDMA (2.5–5 wt%), UDMA (1–2.5 wt%), BisGMA (1–2.5 wt%), Melamine/formaldehyde resin (0.5 wt%), Butylated hydroxytoluene (<0.2 wt%) Nanofiller 81 wt% |
Material | Average Surface Roughness Value (μm) | p | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Min | Max | ||
Lava Ultimate | 2.370 | 0.283 | 1.871 | 2.707 | 0.984 |
GC Cerasmart | 2.357 | 0.262 | 1.920 | 2.805 | |
Vita Enamic | 2.353 | 0.291 | 1.862 | 2.762 | |
Total | 2.360 | 0.273 | 1.862 | 2.805 |
Tea Mean ± SD (MPa) | Cola Mean ± SD (MPa) | Control Mean ± SD (MPa) | |
---|---|---|---|
Lava Ultimate | 16.935 ± 1.768 1 | 15.141 ± 1.640 1 | 18.353 ± 1.866 1,2 |
GC Cerasmart | 16.833 ± 1.728 1 | 17.501 ± 1.449 2 | 17.143 ± 2.204 1 |
Vita Enamic | 14.926 ± 2.283 2 | 15.341 ± 1.352 1 | 19.592 ± 3.359 2 |
Groups | Failure Mode | ||
---|---|---|---|
Adhesive n | Cohesive n | Mixed n | |
GC-0 | 5 | 7 | 3 |
GC–t | 2 | 5 | 8 |
GC–c | 2 | 4 | 9 |
LU-0 | 1 | 7 | 7 |
LU-t | 4 | 5 | 6 |
LU-c | 5 | 5 | 5 |
VE-0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
VE-t | 3 | 3 | 9 |
VE-c | 4 | 3 | 8 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yiğit, E.; Güngör Erdoğan, H.; Eyüboğlu, T.F.; Özcan, M. Effect of Various Beverages on Adhesion of Repaired CAD/CAM Restorative Materials. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14, 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14070380
Yiğit E, Güngör Erdoğan H, Eyüboğlu TF, Özcan M. Effect of Various Beverages on Adhesion of Repaired CAD/CAM Restorative Materials. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2023; 14(7):380. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14070380
Chicago/Turabian StyleYiğit, Elif, Hamiyet Güngör Erdoğan, Tan Fırat Eyüboğlu, and Mutlu Özcan. 2023. "Effect of Various Beverages on Adhesion of Repaired CAD/CAM Restorative Materials" Journal of Functional Biomaterials 14, no. 7: 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14070380