Next Article in Journal
Finite Element Analysis of the Non-Uniform Degradation of Biodegradable Vascular Stents
Next Article in Special Issue
Long-Term Fate and Efficacy of a Biomimetic (Sr)-Apatite-Coated Carbon Patch Used for Bone Reconstruction
Previous Article in Journal
Compressive Properties and Degradable Behavior of Biodegradable Porous Zinc Fabricated with the Protein Foaming Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Devitalized Freeze-Dried Human Umbilical Cord Amniotic Membrane as an Innovative Treatment of Ocular Surface Defects: Preclinical Results

1
Clinique Vétérinaire des Ducs de Bourgogne, 11 Ter Rue Paul Langevin, 21300 Chenove, France
2
Tissue Bank of France, 6 rue d’Italie, 69780 Mions, France
3
Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Traumatologique et Plastique, CHU Besançon, F-25000 Besançon, France
4
Laboratoire de Nanomédecine, Imagerie, Thérapeutique EA 4662, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-25000 Besançon, France
5
Small Animal Clinic, Université de Toulouse, ENVT, 31300 Toulouse, France
6
IHAP, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, ENVT, 31300 Toulouse, France
7
Biology, Engineering and IMAGING of Corneal Graft, BiiGC, Faculty of Medicine, Health Innovation Campus, 10 rue de la Marandière, 42270 Saint-Priest en Jarez, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 13(3), 150; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13030150
Submission received: 25 May 2022 / Revised: 26 August 2022 / Accepted: 8 September 2022 / Published: 13 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biological and Synthetic Membranes for Tissue Regeneration and Repair)

Abstract

:
A preclinical study was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of a new viral inactivated, devitalized, freeze-dried and gamma-sterilized human umbilical cord amniotic membrane (lhUC-AM) for the treatment of deep scleral and corneal defects with or without perforation. Firstly, lhUC-AM was investigated on experimental deep sclerectomy in rabbit eyes (n = 12) and compared to autograft (n = 4) on cross section histology. Secondly, lhUC-AM was studied on a selected series of uncontrolled cases of corneal defects (n = 18) with or without perforation, in dogs and cats. lhUC-AM tolerance, reconstruction of the deep corneal lesion and recovery of the structural aspect of the tissue were followed post-surgery. In experimental deep sclerectomy, histology showed that the lhUC-AM was well tolerated and degraded completely in 45 days while allowing an overall quality and kinetic of scleral regeneration, similar to autograft. In the clinical situations, lhUC-AM was well tolerated, with ocular inflammatory signs quickly decreasing after surgery. Mean follow-up was 16.40 ± 11.43 months. In 15 out of 18 cases, lhUC-AM allowed ocular surface wound healing. The ocular surface was fully reconstructed three months after surgery. This study suggests a good safety and efficacy profile of lhUC-AM in the treatment of deep corneal or scleral defect in animals. This new tissue should now facilitate the treatment of severe ocular surface diseases in humans.

1. Introduction

Deep loss of substance in the sclera or cornea requires, most of the time, a rapid surgical management. The strategy choice for filling the defect depends on multiple factors: the type of defect (ulcer, keratectomy, degeneration and others), the possible superinfection of the defect or of the adjacent cornea, the possible perforation of the defect and the availability of substitute materials.
Several techniques/graft tissues have been described for the treatment of these ocular defects [1]. They include lamellar or penetrating keratoplasty [2,3,4,5], proved to be efficient with minimal complications but not always accessible or feasible in emergency. Corneoscleral/corneoconjunctival transposition [6,7]; conjunctival autografts, including island, pedicle, bulbar, bridge, or complete bulbar graft [1,8]; and autologous corneal graft [9], as well as cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive [10,11] have also been described. However, the corneal structure is partially restored and the transparency of the cornea is delayed for months or is impaired due to scarring. Trials with xenografts biomaterials were also realized with equine or bovine pericardium [12,13], porcine small intestinal submucosa [14,15,16], porcine urinary bladder [17,18] and bovine omentum [19] with promising results in animals. However, to the best of our knowledge, these biomaterials have never been widely distributed or commercialized for cornea repair, especially in humans.
Placental tissues, and especially the human amniotic membrane (hAM), have for several decades shown their numerous therapeutic advantages in both human [20] and veterinary [21] ophthalmology. Indeed, fresh, frozen or freeze-dried (lyophilized) hAM, thanks to its unique structure and myriad of physical and biological properties [22], has been used as an alternative treatment for ocular surface reconstruction after certain diseases, such as persistent epithelial defects and ulceration of the cornea or acute chemical burns [23,24,25,26]. Used alone or in association with conjunctival graft, hAM transplantation reduces inflammation and scarring, promotes epithelialization and wound healing and improves the management of pain [27]. It was shown to be an effective surgical technique with excellent functional and cosmetic outcomes for the treatment of both complicated corneal ulcers in dogs [28] and corneal sequestrum in cats [29,30]. As is the case with hAM, the human umbilical cord (hUC) also has unique biological properties related to its composition [31]. It consists of hUC amniotic membrane (hUC-AM), the outermost layer, which surrounds a mucoid connective tissue called “Wharton’s jelly”, and hUC blood vessels [32]. Wharton’s jelly is the extracellular matrix with high levels of collagen, hyaluronic acid and sulfated glycosaminoglycan (GAG) [33]. The hUC-AM is particularly resistant to twisting and shock. Its physical and biochemical characteristics make it of special interest as a scleral substitute or for deep corneal ulcers.
In the present work, we present the safety and efficacy preclinical study of a new viral inactivated, devitalized, freeze-dried, gamma-sterilized human umbilical cord amniotic membrane called lhUC-AM for severe ocular surface defects.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Tissues Preparation

The lhUC-AM (SclerFIX; Tissue Bank France, Mions, France) was prepared as follows: hUC tissue attached to placenta was collected individually from birth delivery after obtention of donor’s consent for tissue donation and associated, legally required, serological analyses (hepatitis B and C, human T-lymphotropic and human immunodeficiency viruses and syphilis). Placenta was transported in 0.9% sodium chloride solution at 4 °C. In a clean room, the hUC was washed with saline to remove blood clots. After immersion in sterile water between 2 and 72 h, the hUC was opened and the vessels were removed from the lining. The hUC-AM was then preserved in dry conditions at −80 °C until treatment for up to 24 months without biological changes. It was treated by a process consisting of viral inactivation chemical treatment, freeze-drying and gamma-sterilization allowing its conservation for 5 years at room temperature. This innovative patented process secured the product while maintaining its structural and biological integrity. The collection, the development of the process with animal studies was authorized by the French Research Ministry: number DC-2018-3200.

2.2. Histological Evaluation on Rabbits

2.2.1. Animals

Rabbit experiments were carried out in accordance with European and National regulations for the protection of animal rights and with internal Charter on the Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The experimental design was approved by a local French Animal Care and Use Committee. Sixteen healthy male HY79b pigmented rabbits aged over 8 weeks were housed under controlled conditions of temperature and light cycle (12 h light:12 h dark) in an animal housing facility with ad libitum access to food and water. Rabbits were acclimatized for 7 days before surgery.

2.2.2. Surgical Procedure

A deep sclerectomy was performed on the left eye of 16 rabbits under an operating microscope. Briefly, the dorsal bulbar conjunctiva was incised through the conjunctival sac to expose the sclera. A 4 × 4mm square scleral incision was made 3 mm posterior to the limbus. Dissection was continued until reaching the choroid. The defect thus created was filled either by a 4 × 4 mm square of lhUC-AM with epithelial side facing up (n = 12) or by replacing the freshly excised sclera (n = 4). Grafts were sutured using 8 to 10 separated stitches of 9/0 PGA filament (Vicryl®, Ethicon, Johnson and Johnson, Issy les Moulineaux, France). Bulbar conjunctival incision was then closed with continuous suture, using 6-0 PGA polyfilament (Vicryl®, Ethicon, Johnson and Johnson, Issy les Moulineaux, France).

2.2.3. Post-Operative Follow-Up and Evaluations

Daily clinical follow-up was performed, and a thorough ophthalmologic examination was performed at 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 30 and 45 days (D) after surgery to search for: blepharospasm, epiphora, conjunctival hyperemia, conjunctival oedema, iritis. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was monitored by rebound tonometry (Icare TONOVET Plus, Icare Finland Oy, Vantaa, Finland) daily and at a fixed time for 45 days.
At D7, D14, D30 and D45, three animals from the SclerFIX group and one from the autologous group were sacrificed to perform a histopathological study of the eyeballs. The two eyeballs were removed. After transconjunctival enucleation, the globes were fixed with formalin (immersion of formalin 4% then injection via optic nerve after 24 h of fixation) before macroscopic analysis. Macroscopic analysis focused on tissue reactions at the site of implantation: hematoma/bleeding, inflammatory exudate, fibrous reaction, tissue necrosis, as well as the presence, form and location of the graft and the presence of possible residues resulting from its degradation. A macroscopic assessment of the intraocular structures was performed after the eyeballs were cut in half.
The eyeballs were then embedded in paraffin blocks. Sections at a thickness of 3–4 μm were made from the paraffin blocks (1 section/slide, 1 slide/eye). Sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin for histopathological analysis. Red Sirius staining was performed for evaluation of collagen fibers deposits. The slides were read by a pathologist who was not aware of the treatment group. A semi-quantitative grading of local tissue tolerance and integration of the biomaterial was carried out using an intensity score ranging from 0: absent to 5: severely present. It focused on the following parameters: inflammation, oedema and congestion, necrosis, fibrosis within and around scleral implantation site, reduction in the wide of the defect and residues of biomaterial. Scleral reconstruction was evaluated according to scleral defect filling, subconjunctival space and bleb formation, as well as the quality of the reconstructed tissue. Any other observation was also recorded.

2.3. Clinical Evaluation on Cats and Dogs

2.3.1. Animals

Animals were recruited during consultations in a veterinary clinic in France. Participation to the study and treatment with lhUC-AM was suggested for dogs and cats presenting with deep ocular lesions reaching the posterior third of the cornea with a risk of perforation. These lesions could be ulcer or excision of sequestrum after keratectomy. Animals were included in the study after informed written consent of the owner.

2.3.2. Surgical Procedure

Surgery was performed under general anesthesia in the veterinary clinic. The corneal area to be grafted was prepared after standard surgical cleaning. In the case of feline sequestrum or non-perforating ulcer surgery, the necrotic epithelial-stromal area was marked for keratectomy with a calibrated trephine of diameter 0.5 mm greater than the lesion. A lamellar dissection with a crescent knife was discovered to obtain a flat, smooth and calibrated keratectomy bed. In perforated ulcer surgeries, the ulcer margins were resected with corneal scissors to obtain a healthy peripheral collagenous recipient zone. The lhUC-AM was trephined or manually cut to fit the shape and size of the defect. It was placed at the bottom of the defect before being rehydrated with a few drops of 0.9% sodium chloride solution. The graft was then sutured using 3 mm separated stitches of 9/0 PGA filament (Vicryl®, Ethicon, Johnson and Johnson, Issy les Moulineaux, France) to the deepest part of the graft bed to ensure the good coaptation of the graft with the deep stroma.
A second layer of lhUC-AM was placed on top of the first one with stitches securing the two layers of lhUC-AM and the stromal margins when the lesion was very deep or perforating. Alternatively, a thin conjunctival pedicle graft of the same diameter as the lhUC-AM was used in addition to a monolayer of lhUC-AM when the perforation or loss of substance was larger than 8 mm or when the risk of aqueous humor leakage or superinfection was deemed high. The conjunctival graft was placed on top of the lhUC-AM for 45 days before being removed under local anesthesia. In this case, simple resorbable stitches secured the edge of the conjunctival graft, the edge of the lhUC-AM and the superficial stromal margin. Finally, a layer of hAM (VISIO-AMTRIX; Tissue Bank France) was placed on top of the lhUC-AM with 6 conjunctival resorbable stitches (9/0 Vicryl, Ethicon) when it lacked continuity with the epithelial plane. The nictitating membrane was closed for 15 days in all animals that did not receive conjunctival pedicle graft.

2.3.3. Post-Operative Follow-Up and Evaluations

Animals were kept under observation for 24 h. Then, discharge and discomfort were monitored by the owner, with 2 veterinarian visits: one at Day 5 and one at Day 15, which allows opening of the nictitating membrane.
The recommended initial follow-up was at least 3 months post-surgery. However, controls depended on the evolution of each case. Follow-up visits were regrouped by time period post-surgery: between 1 and 14 days, between 15 and 29 days, between 30 and 89 days and 90 days after surgery.
The reconstruction of deep corneal lesions and recovery of the structural aspect of the corneal tissue was assessed by searching for the persistence of the ulcer post-surgery (yes/no), the reconstruction of the cornea at level of the surface (yes/no), the epithelialization (partial/total), the pigmentation (yes/no) and the transparency (grade 0 = very few infiltrates, grade 1 = few infiltrates, grade 2 = significant infiltrates and grade 3 = major infiltrates or opacity). In the case of cats, ocular surface healing was also followed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) when the animal was manageable without anesthesia.
The evolution of the inflammatory criteria was evaluated between the inclusion visit and the post-surgical visits by the following ocular symptoms: corneal edema and congestion (from 0 = absence to 4 = diffuse), blepharospasm (yes/no), watering and discharge (from 0 = absence to 4 = foul smelling constant discharge). Vascularization was scored from 0 (absence) to 4 (4 quadrants) and evaluated in comparison with first post-surgical visit.
Feeling of veterinarian and owner about the recovery were also recorded at each follow-up visit.
Safety was followed by the recording of adverse events (AEs) by the veterinarian throughout the whole duration of the study.

2.4. Data and Statistical Analysis

For clinical evaluation, animals followed less than 45 days were excluded from the analysis. For histological and clinical evaluation, normality of data distribution was analyzed with a Shapiro–Wilk test. When the variable followed a normal distribution, a Student t-test was used to compare measurements between groups, if not a Mann–Whitney U test was used. Rejection of the null hypothesis was defined as α < 0.05 (two-tailed). Statistical analyses were performed using R 4.0.2 (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria).

3. Results

3.1. Histological Evaluation on Rabbits

3.1.1. Clinical Results

No iritis, Tyndall effect or variation of the IOP were observed in either group during the study. Blepharospasm, epiphora, conjunctival hyperemia and conjunctival oedema progressively decreased after surgery and disappeared in both groups after 30 days (Figure 1). At 14 days, conjunctival hyperemia was observed in all but one animal treated by lhUC-AM at weak intensity while in none of the animals treated with autologous graft at 14 days (p = 0.009). No significant differences in blepharospasm, epiphora and conjunctival edema were observed between animals treated by lhUC-AM product and the animal treated with the autologous graft.

3.1.2. Local Tolerance and Biodegradability of the lhUC-AM

Inflammation was greater with lhUC-AM implantation at 7 days and 30 days but decreased drastically afterward and became minimal and at the same level as animals with autograft at 45 days after surgery. Moreover, animals implanted with lhUC-AM showed congestion and oedema of the same intensity as other animals but over a longer duration. The presence of necrotic tissue was similar between the two groups. After 45 days, low-intensity oedema persisted in animals treated by lhUC-AM but no necrosis or congestion was detected in either condition (Figure 2A–D).
Fibrosis was similar in the two conditions: it was mild to moderate and became a dense collagenous tissue with a parallel alignment at 30 days. No fibrosis was detected at 45 days either around or at the implanted site, for both autograft and lhUC-AM (Figure 2E).
The biodegradability of the implant was evaluated according to the amount of residue of the lhUC-AM. The biomaterial was observed within tissue at 7 and 14 days and appeared as an acellular fibrillar collagen membrane. At 30 days, some small and dense fibrous islands were present in the scleral defect, but it was not possible to discriminate degraded lhUC-AM from newly formed fibrous tissue. At D45, lhUC-AM residues were no more detected within the scleral (Figure 2F).

3.1.3. Reconstruction of Scleral Defect

The filling of the defect was similar between animals with autograft and those with lhUC-AM with total filling after 45 days. Although a small amount of bleb was present for animals implanted with lhUC-AM after 30 days, the subconjunctival space was at a physiologic level at 45 days after surgery. The reconstruction kinetics were similar between autograft and lhUC-AM implantation (Figure 3). Finally, the quality of the reconstructed tissue in terms of collagen fibers and conjunctival epithelium was identical to the adjacent tissue at 45 days.

3.2. Clinical Evaluation on Cats and Dogs

3.2.1. Animals

A total of eight dogs and nine cats, including one with bilateral affection, were included in the study (18 eyes) (Table 1). Mean age was 4 ± 3.5 years for dogs and 5 ± 5 years for cats. All dogs had a deep ulcer. For cats, two had a deep ulcer, one had a very large keratomalacia with a corneal perforation, one had a perforation following spontaneous expulsion of sequestrum, and six had a deep keratectomy after surgical removal of feline sequestrum. At inclusion, ulcer size was greater than 2 mm in 94% (17/18) of cases and greater than 5 mm in 61% (11/18) of cases. All animals showed clinical signs of severity (Table 1).

3.2.2. Surgical Procedure

During surgery, six eyes received one-layer of lhUC-AM (33%, 4 cats, 1 dog). Double-layer of lhUC-AM was used in three animals (17%, 2 cats, 1 dog). lhUC-AM was combined with conjunctival pedicle graft in four animals (22%, 4 dogs) and with hAM in five animals (28%, 3 cats, 2 dogs).

3.2.3. Follow-Up/Outcomes

Seventeen animals (18 eyes) were included in the study, three animals ended the study prematurely at days 2, 12 and 21 post-surgery due to failure and one case was followed up for only 45 days. Thus, 13 animals (14 eyes) were followed for at least 3 months. So, the mean follow-up was 16.40 ± 11.43 months (range, 1.5–36.5).
The success rate was 83% (15/18). The three cases of failure were: 1/a dog treated by lhUC-AM and conjunctival pedicle graft for deep ulcer presented a perforation with dehiscence of the lhUC-AM and conjunctival layers, leading to enucleation at day 2 post-surgery; 2/a dog treated by lhUC-AM + hAM for deep ulcer presented with a descemetocele with graft failure at 12 days post-surgery; 3/a cat treated by one-layer of lhUC-AM for deep ulcer had doubtful engraftment on the deep bed at 15 days post-surgery followed by mutilation and expulsion of the graft at 21 days.
There was no recurrence of the disease in our follow-up period (3–15 months). Photographs of the cornea of one case in each treatment group taken at inclusion, at surgery, and during follow-up are displayed in Figure 4. After 3 months post-surgery, all deep lesions were resorbed with reconstruction of the cornea at the level of the surface. Thus, there was no difference in term of resorption between groups treated by one-layer lhUC-AM, two-layer lhUC-AM, lhUC-AM and conjunctival pedicle graft and lhUC-AM and hAM (p = 1). All groups combined, total epithelialization was observed in 67% of the cases followed up at 15 days, 86% of the cases followed up at 1 month, then 100% of the cases followed up over one month. No corneal pigmentation was observed in the first 3 months following the surgery. However, corneal pigmentation was observed in two dogs (14%) treated by lhUC-AM and conjunctival pedicle graft, including one with glaucoma, during the long-term follow-up (>3 months). Grade 0 of transparency was observed in 90% of the cases at 3 months (9/10) and in 93% of the cases at more than 3 months (13/14).
All groups combined, ocular inflammatory signs quickly decreased after surgery. Corneal edema, blepharospasm and lacrimation decreased significantly a few days post-surgery. After 3 months, no animal had edema or blepharospasm, and three dogs (17%, one dog treated with by one-layer lhUC-AM, two dogs treated by lhUC-AM and conjunctival pedicle graft) still showed epiphora. Congestion also decreased significantly from 15 days post-surgery. After 3 months, only one dog had congestion and congestion was linked to glaucoma. In all groups combined, corneal vascularity decreased significantly between the first postsurgical visit and the visit beyond 3 months. The veterinarian and owner felt that all cases, excluding cases of failure and one case with glaucoma (78%), had significative improvement at more than 3 months, as compared to inclusion. The difference between inclusion and the long-term follow-up visit was still judged as better by both the veterinarian and the owner for the dog with glaucoma.

4. Discussion

Deep ocular surface defects are ophthalmological emergencies for the preservation of the vision and the integrity of the globe. Several grafting techniques, with varying efficacy and limitations, have been described and are emerging for the treatment of these types of defects.
lhUC-AM used in this study have the particularity to result from an innovative process, including chemical devitalization, viral inactivation, freeze-drying and gamma-sterilization. To the best of our knowledge, no published study has evaluated the use of a devitalized freeze-dried hUC-AM product for the treatment of these ocular conditions.
Thanks to this process and the adequate screening of the placenta donors, this type of product allows the use of secure grafts with no risk of transmitting bacterial, viral or fungal infections to recipients. Moreover, this lhUC-AM product provides additional advantages, such as high availability (thanks to the relative availability of placentas), long-term storage and shipment at room temperature. It can also be easily dimensioned at the size of the defect and sutured with less risk of tearing (unlike sometimes hAM). Composed of hAM and Wharton’s jelly, the hUC wall benefits from growth factors, hyaluronic acid and GAG [31,33], which could be a promising source for corneal surface regeneration.
In this article, we presented two investigations, one performed on rabbits, allowing histological evaluation, and one performed under routine conditions (veterinary clinic) allowing clinical evaluation. The histological evaluation following deep sclerectomy surgical procedure on rabbits showed that lhUC-AM is well tolerated by the recipient and quickly degraded while offering an overall quality and kinetic of scleral reconstruction similar to autograft. The newly reconstructed sclera has similar characteristics with the physiological sclera with a good tolerance. lhUC-AM, thus, happens to be as efficient as an autologous graft for transplant defect, which make it a good candidate for scleral transplantation.
The clinical evaluation on selected corneal disease in a small series of dogs and cats showed that the use of lhUC-AM graft appeared to be effective with good results in terms of corneal healing when used alone for treatment of deep ocular surface defects or when used in combination with additional superficial sheet in the cases of very deep (loss of substance larger than 8 mm), perforating defects or defects with high risks of complications, with total reconstruction of the cornea at the level of the surface 3 months post-surgery regardless the group. Healing kinetic was similar between the groups. The product also showed good tolerance with ocular inflammatory signs quickly decreasing after surgery and the improvement of transparency over time.
The three cases of the failure of this experiment were not related to the lhUC-AM product. The dog with failure due to glaucoma was a Shih Tzu, which is a breed with high risk of secondary hypertensive uveitis. The second dog was an English bulldog with wide central descemetocele, which are known factors of ulcer complications in dogs. The last failure was due to cat scratching self-mutilation after opening of nictitating membrane.
This clinical evaluation presents some limitations. Firstly, the lhUC-AM product has not been compared to a standard surgery. So, we cannot assure the superiority of this product over the other treatments presented in the introduction of this article [1,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
But the filling capability or kinetic of regeneration of deep defects is an interest of lhUC-AM. Despite multilayer treatment, the risk of incomplete filling of hAM can impact visual results. Less filling after the excision of conjunctival tumor can generate a risk of perforation or fibrosis. The kinetic of regeneration of this lhUC-AM could solve the timeline of proton therapy in case of malignant tumor.
Secondly, the clinical evaluation was carried out with a small sample of animals and would deserve to be carried out on a larger scale.
However, in view of the good tolerance (histologically and clinically evaluate) and the good long-term prognosis provided by the lhUC-AM, it could be clinical tested in humans for patients presenting a large defect of the ocular surface or risk of scleral thinning after surgical excision of conjunctival tumor.

5. Conclusions

This preclinical study suggests a good safety and efficacy profile of freeze-dried hUC-AM in the treatment of deep corneal or scleral defect in animals. This new tissue should now facilitate the treatment of severe ocular surface diseases in humans.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.B.; Methodology, S.C., L.B. and J.-Y.D.; Validation, S.C., L.B. and J.-Y.D.; Formal Analysis, J.B.; Investigation, S.C., M.-C.R. and J.-Y.D.; Resources, S.C., L.B. and J.-Y.D.; Data Curation, S.C., J.B., M.-C.R. and J.-Y.D.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, J.B.; Writing—Review and Editing, S.C., L.B., F.G., M.-C.R., J.-Y.D. and G.T.; Visualization, J.B.; Supervision, L.B.; Project Administration, L.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Tissue Bank of France (TBF).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Rabbits experiments were carried out in accordance with European and National regulations for the protection of animal rights and with internal Charter on the Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The experimental design was approved by the local Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Veterinary School of Toulouse n° 201703281214133. Cats and dogs recruited during consultation at the veterinary clinic were included in the study after informed written consent from the owner.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend special thanks to the National Veterinary School of Toulouse (envt), France for providing resources for the experiment on rabbits; to Atlantic Bone Screen (ABS), France for histological processing and to Emilie Courrier from Tissue Bank of France (TBF) for her assistance in drafting the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

L.B. declares financial relationships with the society Tissue Bank of France that have interest in the submitted work. Other authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References

  1. Wilkie, D.A.; Whittaker, C. Surgery of the cornea. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 1997, 27, 1067–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hansen, P.A.; Guandalini, A. A retrospective study of 30 cases of frozen lamellar corneal graft in dogs and cats. Vet. Ophthalmol. 1999, 2, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Peña Gimenez, M.T.P.; Fariña, I.M. Lamellar keratoplasty for the treatment of feline corneal sequestrum. Vet. Ophthalmol. 1998, 1, 163–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lacerda, R.P.; Peña Gimenez, M.T.; Laguna, F.; Costa, D.; Ríos, J.; Leiva, M. Corneal grafting for the treatment of full-thickness corneal defects in dogs: A review of 50 cases. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2017, 20, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Laguna, F.; Leiva, M.; Costa, D.; Lacerda, R.; Peña Gimenez, T. Corneal grafting for the treatment of feline corneal sequestrum: A retrospective study of 18 eyes (13 cats). Vet. Ophthalmol. 2015, 18, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Andrew, S.E.; Tou, S.; Brooks, D.E. Corneoconjunctival transposition for the treatment of feline corneal sequestra: A retrospective study of 17 cases (1990–1998). Vet. Ophthalmol. 2001, 4, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Graham, K.L.; White, J.D.; Billson, F.M. Feline corneal sequestra: Outcome of corneoconjunctival transposition in 97 cats (109 eyes). J. Feline Med. Surg. 2017, 19, 710–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hollingsworth, S.R. Corneal surgical techniques. Clin. Tech. Small Anim. Pract. 2003, 18, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jaksz, M.; Fischer, M.-C.; Fenollosa-Romero, E.; Busse, C. Autologous corneal graft for the treatment of deep corneal defects in dogs: 15 cases (2014–2017). J. Small Anim. Pract. 2021, 62, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rana, M.; Savant, V. A brief review of techniques used to seal corneal perforation using cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. Contact Lens Anterior Eye J. Br. Contact Lens Assoc. 2013, 36, 156–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vote, B.J.; Elder, M.J. Cyanoacrylate glue for corneal perforations: A description of a surgical technique and a review of the literature. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2000, 28, 437–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Barros, P.S.D.M.; Safatle, A.M.D.V.; Rigueiro, M. Experimental lamellar corneal graft in dogs using preserved equine pericardium. Braz. J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci. 1999, 36, 304–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dulaurent, T.; Azoulay, T.; Goulle, F.; Dulaurent, A.; Mentek, M.; Peiffer, R.L.; Isard, P.F. Use of bovine pericardium (Tutopatch®) graft for surgical repair of deep melting corneal ulcers in dogs and corneal sequestra in cats. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2014, 17, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bussieres, M.; Krohne, S.G.; Stiles, J.; Townsend, W.M. The use of porcine small intestinal submucosa for the repair of full-thickness corneal defects in dogs, cats and horses. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2004, 7, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Barachetti, L.; Zanni, M.; Stefanello, D.; Rampazzo, A. Use of four-layer porcine small intestinal submucosa alone as a scaffold for the treatment of deep corneal defects in dogs and cats: Preliminary results. Vet. Rec. 2020, 186, e28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Goulle, F. Use of porcine small intestinal submucosa for corneal reconstruction in dogs and cats: 106 cases. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2012, 53, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chow, D.W.Y.; Westermeyer, H.D. Retrospective evaluation of corneal reconstruction using ACell Vet(TM) alone in dogs and cats: 82 cases. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2016, 19, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Balland, O.; Poinsard, A.-S.; Famose, F.; Goulle, F.; Isard, P.-F.; Mathieson, I.; Dulaurent, T. Use of a porcine urinary bladder acellular matrix for corneal reconstruction in dogs and cats. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2016, 19, 454–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Thajunnisa, A.S.; Sainulabdeen, A.; Dileepkumar, K.M.; Philip, L.M.; Vasudevan, V.N.; Devanand, C.B. Comparative evaluation of decellularized bovine omentum alone and in combination with mitomycin-C in the management of corneal injuries in dogs. Vet. World 2020, 13, 2401–2410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dua, H.S.; Azuara-Blanco, A. Amniotic membrane transplantation. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1999, 83, 748–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Barros, P.S.; Garcia, J.A.; Laus, J.L.; Ferreira, A.L.; Salles Gomes, T.L. The use of xenologous amniotic membrane to repair canine corneal perforation created by penetrating keratectomy. Vet. Ophthalmol. 1998, 1, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jirsova, K.; Jones, G.L.A. Amniotic membrane in ophthalmology: Properties, preparation, storage and indications for grafting-a review. Cell Tissue Bank. 2017, 18, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Meller, D.; Pauklin, M.; Thomasen, H.; Westekemper, H.; Steuhl, K.-P. Amniotic membrane transplantation in the human eye. Dtsch. Ärzteblatt Int. 2011, 108, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Meller, D.; Pires, R.T.; Mack, R.J.; Figueiredo, F.; Heiligenhaus, A.; Park, W.C.; Prabhasawat, P.; John, T.; McLeod, S.D.; Steuhl, K.P.; et al. Amniotic membrane transplantation for acute chemical or thermal burns. Ophthalmology 2000, 107, 980–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lee, S.H.; Tseng, S.C. Amniotic membrane transplantation for persistent epithelial defects with ulceration. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1997, 123, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, J.; Sheha, H.; Fu, Y.; Liang, L.; Tseng, S.C. Update on amniotic membrane transplantation. Expert Rev. Ophthalmol. 2010, 5, 645–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Walkden, A. Amniotic Membrane Transplantation in Ophthalmology: An Updated Perspective. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2020, 14, 2057–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Costa, D.; Leiva, M.; Sanz, F.; Espejo, V.; Esteban, J.; Vergara, J.; Díaz, C.; Huguet, E.; Cairó, M.; Ríos, J.; et al. A multicenter retrospective study on cryopreserved amniotic membrane transplantation for the treatment of complicated corneal ulcers in the dog. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2019, 22, 695–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Barachetti, L.; Giudice, C.; Mortellaro, C.M. Amniotic membrane transplantation for the treatment of feline corneal sequestrum: Pilot study. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2010, 13, 326–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ion, L.; Ionascu, I.; de Joz, C.G.; Cerrada, I.; Birtoiu, A.; Huguet, E. Human amniotic membrane transplantation in the treatment of feline corneal sequestrum: Preliminary results. AgroLife Sci. J. 2016, 5, 91–98. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gupta, A.; El-Amin, S.F.; Levy, H.J.; Sze-Tu, R.; Ibim, S.E.; Maffulli, N. Umbilical cord-derived Wharton’s jelly for regenerative medicine applications. J. Orthop. Surg 2020, 15, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Silini, A.R.; Di Pietro, R.; Lang-Olip, I.; Alviano, F.; Banerjee, A.; Basile, M.; Borutinskaite, V.; Eissner, G.; Gellhaus, A.; Giebel, B.; et al. Perinatal Derivatives: Where Do We Stand? A Roadmap of the Human Placenta and Consensus for Tissue and Cell Nomenclature. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 610544. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Bańkowski, E.; Sobolewski, K.; Romanowicz, L.; Chyczewski, L.; Jaworski, S. Collagen and glycosaminoglycans of Wharton’s jelly and their alterations in EPH-gestosis. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol 1996, 66, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Monitoring of post-operative blepharospasm (A), epiphora (B), conjunctival hyperemia (C) and conjunctival oedema (D). The asterisk indicates a significant difference between the autologous graft and the tUCL groups.
Figure 1. Monitoring of post-operative blepharospasm (A), epiphora (B), conjunctival hyperemia (C) and conjunctival oedema (D). The asterisk indicates a significant difference between the autologous graft and the tUCL groups.
Jfb 13 00150 g001
Figure 2. Monitoring of local tolerance and biodegradability of the implanted biomaterial: inflammation (A), congestion (B), oedema (C), necrosis (D), fibrosis around (Ea) and in (Eb) the biomaterial, amount (Fa) and colonization (Fb) of biomaterial residue.
Figure 2. Monitoring of local tolerance and biodegradability of the implanted biomaterial: inflammation (A), congestion (B), oedema (C), necrosis (D), fibrosis around (Ea) and in (Eb) the biomaterial, amount (Fa) and colonization (Fb) of biomaterial residue.
Jfb 13 00150 g002
Figure 3. Kinetic of sclera reconstruction at day 7 (D7), D14, D30 and D45 in rabbits with or without lhUC-AM versus scleral autograft. Black arrows showed the normal sclera and blue arrows showed the thickness of the sclera at the site of the deep sclerectomy.
Figure 3. Kinetic of sclera reconstruction at day 7 (D7), D14, D30 and D45 in rabbits with or without lhUC-AM versus scleral autograft. Black arrows showed the normal sclera and blue arrows showed the thickness of the sclera at the site of the deep sclerectomy.
Jfb 13 00150 g003
Figure 4. Follow-up of cats with deep corneal defects and treated by one-layer lhUC-AM, two-layer lhUC-AM, lhUC-AM and conjunctival pedicle graft or lhUC-AM and hAM.
Figure 4. Follow-up of cats with deep corneal defects and treated by one-layer lhUC-AM, two-layer lhUC-AM, lhUC-AM and conjunctival pedicle graft or lhUC-AM and hAM.
Jfb 13 00150 g004
Table 1. Signalment, surgical details and outcomes of the treatment with lhUC-AM.
Table 1. Signalment, surgical details and outcomes of the treatment with lhUC-AM.
Case No.AnimalAgeIndicationDefect SizeTreatmentSuccessFollow-Up Time (Months)Observations on Long Term (>3 Months)
1Cat11 yearsDeep ulcer>5 mm2-layer lhUC-AMYes1.5-
2Cat6 yearsPerforation after spontaneous expulsion of sequestrum>5 mm2-layer lhUC-AMYes36-
3Dog11 yearsDeep ulcer>5 mmlhUC-AM +conjunctival graftYes9Corneal pigmentation, opacity, epiphora and congestion in two quadrants probably related to glaucoma
4Dog7 monthsDeep ulcer>2 mmlhUC-AM + hAMYes36.5
5Dog3 yearsDeep ulcer>2 mmlhUC-AM + hAMNo-Descemetocele with graft failure at 12 days post-surgery
6Cat7 yearsDeep keratectomy after surgical removal of feline sequestrum>5 mmlhUC-AM + hAMYes4-
7Cat11 monthsDeep keratectomy after surgical removal of feline sequestrum>5 mmlhUC-AM + hAMYes14.5-
8Dog11 monthsDeep ulcer>2 mmlhUC-AM +conjunctival graftYes31-
9Dog14 yearsDeep ulcer>1 mm2-layer lhUC-AMYes16-
10Dog3 yearsDeep ulcer>2 mmlhUC-AM +conjunctival graftYes16Corneal pigmentation, epiphora
11aCat6 monthsDeep keratectomy after surgical removal of feline sequestrum>5 mm1-layer lhUC-AMYes8-
11b9 monthsDeep keratectomy after surgical removal of feline sequestrum>5 mm1-layer lhUC-AMYes4-
12Dog7 yearsDeep ulcer>5 mmlhUC-AM +conjunctival graftNo-Perforation with dehiscence of the lhUC-AM and conjunctival layers, leading to enucleation at day 2 post-surgery
13Cat5 yearsDeep keratectomy after surgical removal of feline sequestrum>5 mm1-layers lhUC-AMYes14-
14Cat20 monthsDeep ulcer>2 mm1-layers lhUC-AMNo-Doubtful engraftment on the deep bed at 15 days post-surgery followed by mutilation and expulsion of the graft at 21 days
15Dog18 monthsDeep ulcer>2 mm1-layers lhUC-AMYes27.5Epiphora
16Cat16 monthsVery large keratomalacia with corneal perforation>5 mmlhUC-AM + hAMYes11-
17Cat6 yearsDeep keratectomy after surgical rcat treated by one-layer oemoval of feline sequestrum>5 mm2-layers lhUC-AMYes18-
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cognard, S.; Barnouin, L.; Bosc, J.; Gindraux, F.; Robin, M.-C.; Douet, J.-Y.; Thuret, G. New Devitalized Freeze-Dried Human Umbilical Cord Amniotic Membrane as an Innovative Treatment of Ocular Surface Defects: Preclinical Results. J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 13, 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13030150

AMA Style

Cognard S, Barnouin L, Bosc J, Gindraux F, Robin M-C, Douet J-Y, Thuret G. New Devitalized Freeze-Dried Human Umbilical Cord Amniotic Membrane as an Innovative Treatment of Ocular Surface Defects: Preclinical Results. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2022; 13(3):150. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13030150

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cognard, Sophie, Laurence Barnouin, Justine Bosc, Florelle Gindraux, Marie-Claire Robin, Jean-Yves Douet, and Gilles Thuret. 2022. "New Devitalized Freeze-Dried Human Umbilical Cord Amniotic Membrane as an Innovative Treatment of Ocular Surface Defects: Preclinical Results" Journal of Functional Biomaterials 13, no. 3: 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13030150

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop