Information 2013, 4(1), 33-59; doi:10.3390/info4010033
Article

Semantic Information and the Trivialization of Logic: Floridi on the Scandal of Deduction

Department of Economics and Management, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, 44121, Italy
Received: 19 November 2012; Accepted: 27 December 2012 / Published: 11 January 2013
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [302 KB, Updated Version, uploaded 14 January 2013 16:31 CET]
The original version is still available [302 KB, uploaded 11 January 2013 14:19 CET]
Abstract: In this paper we discuss Floridi’s views concerning semantic information in the light of a recent contribution (in collaboration with the present author) [1] that defies the traditional view of deductive reasoning as “analytic” or “tautological” and construes it as an informative, albeit non-empirical, activity. We argue that this conception paves the way for a more realistic notion of semantic information where the “ideal agents” that are assumed by the standard view can be indefinitely approximated by real ones equipped with growing computational resources.
Keywords: semantic information; Cohen–Nagel paradox; tractability; analytic-synthetic distinction

Article Statistics

Load and display the download statistics.

Citations to this Article

Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

D'Agostino, M. Semantic Information and the Trivialization of Logic: Floridi on the Scandal of Deduction. Information 2013, 4, 33-59.

AMA Style

D'Agostino M. Semantic Information and the Trivialization of Logic: Floridi on the Scandal of Deduction. Information. 2013; 4(1):33-59.

Chicago/Turabian Style

D'Agostino, Marcello. 2013. "Semantic Information and the Trivialization of Logic: Floridi on the Scandal of Deduction." Information 4, no. 1: 33-59.

Information EISSN 2078-2489 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert