Information 2011, 2(4), 635-650; doi:10.3390/info2040635
Article

Constructive Verification, Empirical Induction, and Falibilist Deduction: A Threefold Contrast

email
Received: 9 August 2011; in revised form: 21 October 2011 / Accepted: 26 October 2011 / Published: 31 October 2011
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract: This article explores some open questions related to the problem of verification of theories in the context of empirical sciences by contrasting three epistemological frameworks. Each of these epistemological frameworks is based on a corresponding central metaphor, namely: (a) Neo-empiricism and the gambling metaphor; (b) Popperian falsificationism and the scientific tribunal metaphor; (c) Cognitive constructivism and the object as eigen-solution metaphor. Each of one of these epistemological frameworks has also historically co-evolved with a certain statistical theory and method for testing scientific hypotheses, respectively: (a) Decision theoretic Bayesian statistics and Bayes factors; (b) Frequentist statistics and p-values; (c) Constructive Bayesian statistics and e-values. This article examines with special care the Zero Probability Paradox (ZPP), related to the verification of sharp or precise hypotheses. Finally, this article makes some remarks on Lakatos’ view of mathematics as a quasi-empirical science.
Keywords: Bayesian statistics; cognitive constructivism; eigen-solutions; Imre Lakatos; neo-empiricism; Popperian falsificationism; sharp hypotheses; zero probability paradox
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [214 KB, uploaded 31 October 2011 09:06 CET]

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Stern, J.M. Constructive Verification, Empirical Induction, and Falibilist Deduction: A Threefold Contrast. Information 2011, 2, 635-650.

AMA Style

Stern JM. Constructive Verification, Empirical Induction, and Falibilist Deduction: A Threefold Contrast. Information. 2011; 2(4):635-650.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stern, Julio Michael. 2011. "Constructive Verification, Empirical Induction, and Falibilist Deduction: A Threefold Contrast." Information 2, no. 4: 635-650.

Information EISSN 2078-2489 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert