Next Article in Journal
Luther, Bach, and the Jews: The Place of Objectionable Texts in the Classroom
Next Article in Special Issue
Should CRISPR Scientists Play God?
Previous Article in Journal
Teaching Music in the Reformed/Calvinist Tradition: Sphere Sovereignty and the Arts
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Religions 2017, 8(4), 52; doi:10.3390/rel8040052

New Technologies—Old Anthropologies?

Graduate Theological Union, 2918 Regent St #D, Berkeley, CA 94705, USA
Academic Editor: Noreen Herzfeld
Received: 1 March 2017 / Revised: 29 March 2017 / Accepted: 29 March 2017 / Published: 31 March 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religion and the New Technologies)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [196 KB, uploaded 6 April 2017]

Abstract

Eighty years ago, Nicholas Berdyaev cautioned that new technological problems needed to be addressed with a new philosophical anthropology. Today, the transhumanist goal of mind uploading is perceived by many theologians and philosophers to be dangerous due to its violation of the human person. I contrast transhumanist “patternist” views of the person with Brent Waters’s Augustinian view of the technological pilgrim, Celia Deane-Drummond’s evolutionary Thomistic view of humanity, and Francis Fukuyama’s insistence on the inviolability of “Factor X”. These latter three thinkers all disagree with the patternist position, but their views are also discordant with each other. This disagreement constitutes a challenge for people of faith confronting transhumanism—which view is to be taken right? I contend that Science, Technology and Society (STS) studies can enrich our understanding of the debates by highlighting the transmutation of philosophical view into scientific theory and the intermingled nature of our forms of knowledge. Furthermore, I contend that STS helps Christians understand the evolution of their own anthropologies and suggests some prospects for future theological anthropology. View Full-Text
Keywords: consciousness uploading; Science, Technology and Society studies (STS); theological anthropology; philosophical anthropology; transhumanism consciousness uploading; Science, Technology and Society studies (STS); theological anthropology; philosophical anthropology; transhumanism
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Checketts, L. New Technologies—Old Anthropologies? Religions 2017, 8, 52.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Religions EISSN 2077-1444 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert Logo copyright Steve Bridenbaugh/UUA
Back to Top