On the Question at the End of Theodicy
Department of Religion, University of Rice, Houston, TX 77005-1892, USA
Received: 8 November 2017 / Revised: 29 November 2017 / Accepted: 1 December 2017 / Published: 8 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Theodicy
This article argues that theodicy provides an insufficient response to suffering - one that often further victimizes those who suffering most. In it’s place, I argue for a moralist response based on Albert Camus and W. E. B. Du Bois.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
Share & Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Pinn, A.B. On the Question at the End of Theodicy. Religions 2017, 8, 268.
Pinn AB. On the Question at the End of Theodicy. Religions. 2017; 8(12):268.
Pinn, Anthony B. 2017. "On the Question at the End of Theodicy." Religions 8, no. 12: 268.
Show more citation formats
Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
[Return to top]
For more information on the journal statistics, click here
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.