Population Characteristics of the Mud Shrimp Upogebia major (De Haan, 1841) (Decapoda: Gebiidea: Upogebiidae) on Korean Tidal Flats in the Eastern Yellow Sea

Abstract

The population parameters of the ecologically important mud shrimp Upogebia major (De Haan, 1841) were analyzed from 2012 to 2015 in tidal flats in Seonjaedo and Jugyo on the west coast of Korea. The shrimp density averaged 265/m² in Seonjaedo and 118/m² in Jugyo. The sex ratio varied monthly, often male-biased, and, by size, males were significantly dominant, with a carapace length (CL) over 30 mm. Although the shrimp settled almost annually, only a single size-group was observed from 2012 to 2014. The recruitment in Jugyo in 2014 was notably successful, resulting in two cohorts persisting until 2015. Many shrimp were parasitized at varying local rates: 6.0% in Seonjaedo and 37.1% in Jugyo. The growth curves revealed that the shrimp grew annually after settlement, reaching CLs of 11.90, 18.24, and 23.02 mm in Seonjaedo and 13.73, 20.86, and 25.82 mm in Jugyo. Annual mortality was 77.2% in Seonjaedo and 67.4% in Jugyo. The estimated lifespan (t_max) was 10 years in Seonjaedo and 8 years in Jugyo, whereas the 2010 cohort in Jugyo largely disappeared in 5 years. Ovigerous females appeared from November to June and benthic juveniles between June and September. The shrimps’ growth was slower relative to other East Asian populations, likely due to colder sea water temperatures and altered food conditions from a higher shrimp density.

1. Introduction

The genus Upogebia, belonging to the family Upogebiidae (subphylum Crustacea: class Malacostraca: order Decapoda: infraorder Gebiidea), commonly known as mud shrimp, inhabits oceans worldwide and currently comprises approximately 280 species [1]. Among these, Upogebia major (De Haan, 1841) is recognized as one of the largest mud shrimps, measuring over 15 cm in total length (based on personal observation). This species constructs extensive Y-shaped burrows below the sediment surface and often occurs in very high densities [2,3] in intertidal sandy mudflats, with observed depths reaching over 2.08 m [2]. It is commonly found along the coasts of Korea, Japan, China, and Russia [4,5,6,7,8,9]. They are considered among the most influential ecosystem engineers in marine soft-bottom ecosystems [6,10,11,12,13]. Their burrows not only expand into the sediment surface areas of estuaries and supply oxygenated water deep into subsurface sediments [14,15,16,17], but they also become microhabitats for various benthic animals and influence the structure of benthic communities in these habitats [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Additionally, their filter feeding improves water quality by capturing suspended particles, which in turn affects the coastal ecosystem and serves a vital ecological function [11,27,28,29,30,31,32].

In the Pacific Northeast, Upogebia pugettensis (Dana, 1852), although occasionally found in lower numbers, was often abundant, exceeding 400 shrimp/m² [33,34,35]. The mud shrimp occurs in relatively well-defined beds that cover significant portions of the intertidal zone in many of the Pacific Northeast estuaries. However, recently, this mud shrimp has mostly disappeared [36]. Dramatic declines in this native northeast Pacific mud shrimp over the past three decades have occurred in response to intense infestations by the Asian bopyrid isopod parasite, Orthione griffenis Markham, 2004 introduced in the 1980s [17,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. Making matters worse, the recent taxonomic review of Upogebia revealed a previously reported 1912 invasion of San Francisco Bay by Upogebia affinis (Say, 1818) that was in error; hence, the introduction of U. major is the first confirmed gebiid invasion in the world. Therefore, the individual and combined bopyrid isopod parasite O. griffenis and upogebiid U. major invasions from the Northwest Pacific now threaten U. pugettensis in particular, and even all other native Upogebia species occurring north of Mexico in the Northeast Pacific [44].

Upogebia major is common and abundant in the upper intertidal mudflats of the western coast of Korea. However, there has been a rapid expansion in its distribution since 2010, leading to reported invasions into clam culture beds along the west coast of Korea. In particular, the Manila clam culture beds in the tidal flat of Seonjaedo, Incheon, located in the middle part of the west coast of Korea, have seen a 90% reduction in clam production, and mud shrimp have invaded 3986 ha of the clam beds of Chungcheongnam-do, which account for 76.7% of the total 5200 ha, leading to a financial loss of KRW 10.8 billion (USD 8 million). However, the local media reported a recent decrease in the mud shrimp population in the clam beds [45]. Nevertheless, the need for ecological knowledge of the U. major population remains, due to its ecological significance and effective control in the Manila clam culture.

Studies have been conducted on the larval development of U. major [46,47], its burrow structure [2,48], parasitism and commensalism [49,50,51,52], sexual dimorphism [53], life history, and the ecological characteristics [6,8]. Population characteristics have been studied in Tokyo Bay, Japan, and Vostok Bay, Russia [4,54]. The populations in Korea have been studied in Namhae on the south coast and in Boryeong on the west coast [55,56]. However, no study has comprehensively observed the entire life history of this mud shrimp population from recruitment to cohort disappearance in Korea. This study focused on describing population parameters, including structure, growth, mortality, lifespan, and reproduction, by observing U. major populations for five years inhabiting the intertidal mud flats along the west coast of Korea.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Sites

The study sites were in two regions of the west coast of Korea: Seonjaedo in Incheon and Jugyo in Boryeong, Chungcheongnam-do. These sites have reported abnormal blooms of mud shrimp populations. Seonjaedo Island is located between two islands, Daebudo to the east and Yeongheungdo to the west (Figure 1). With a mean tidal range of about 5.2 m [57], expansive tidal flats about 2.5 km wide emerge during low tide. Particularly, the northeast tidal flat continues to Daebudo Island. Of the total 3.00 km² culture beds associated with the Seonjae Fishing Village Society, an area of 1.75 km² is reserved for Manila clams, Ruditapes philippinarum (Adams and Reeve, 1850). This area produces between 500 and 600 tons of Manila clams annually [58]. The study site was on the eastern tidal flat of Seonjaedo (N 37°14′37.3″, E 126°32′18.0″), characterized by sandy mud (sM) to slightly gravelly muddy sand ((g)mS) with 26% to 94% sand [59], where an abnormal bloom of mud shrimp was observed around 2010 [60]. At this site, no efforts were made to eradicate the mud shrimp. After the bloom of the shrimp, the subsequent decline in clam production led to the cessation of fishing activities. Consequently, the mud shrimp population at the site has been maintained without any artificial disturbance. The other study site, Jugyo tidal flat (N 36°21′59.5″, E 126°31′10.9″), is located on the coast 100 km south of Seonjaedo (Figure 1). The southern part of the Jugyo tidal flat is adjacent to the Daecheoncheon estuary. The mean tidal range is about 4.5 m [57]. During low tide, a tidal flat with a width of 1.7 to 2.5 km is exposed along the shoreline. The tidal flat covers a total area of 5.60 km², of which 1.38 km² is dedicated to clam culture beds. The dominant type of surface sediment is sand (S), at more than 93% [61]. The bloom of mud shrimp here was first observed by local fishermen in April 2010 [62]. By August of the same year, it was reported that the tiny holes made by the mud shrimp had expanded to the size of a ballpoint pen. Under the guidance of the Jugyo fisheries cooperative, consistent efforts were made from 2011 until the end of this study in 2013 to remove the mud shrimp and enhance the mudflat environment for better clam production. However, the sampling station was excluded from these efforts, ensuring that the mud shrimp population persisted without any artificial intervention throughout the research period.

2.2. Field Survey

Field surveys were conducted at Seonjaedo from February 2012 to June 2014 and at Jugyo from February 2012 to December 2015. As environmental factors, the temperature of the sediment surface and the sediment 10 cm below was recorded every hour throughout the study period using a temperature logger (Thermochron iButton model DS1921G-F5#, Maxim Integrated, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The annual mean temperature was obtained from a one-year interval moving average of the data. We used the harmonic constants obtained from the Republic of Korea Hydrographic and Oceanographic Agency (KHOA) at each site to extract the elevation for the tidal datums and mean tidal range (mean high water to mean low water). We determined the elevation of the sampling stations using an RTK GPS (K5-PLUS, KORIDA) to estimate the inundation time. Tidal observation data from tidal stations near the study sites were obtained from the KHOA. Data at the Yeongheungdo tidal station from 2012 to 2014 were used for Seonjaedo, and data at the Boryeong station from 2012 to 2015 were used for Jugyo. The tide correction constants for the sampling stations were obtained from the KHOA, and the difference between the Incheon mean sea level (IMSL) and the local mean sea level (MSL) was calculated using the land and sea height linkage service of the National Geographic Information Institute (NGII). The data were used to estimate the inundation time at each sampling station and then were converted to the daily mean.

For population analysis, mud shrimp were collected monthly at spring tides during low tide. From February 2012 to October 2012, 150 to 200 specimens were collected in a non-quantitative manner by digging into the sediment with a shovel. From November 2012 onward, all specimens within a 5 m² area were collected at a depth of 80 to 100 cm. The sampling depth was based on a report that approximately 97% of the total mud shrimp population was distributed at depths less than 80 cm within a 0 to 120 cm depth range in Tokyo Bay, Japan [4]. We sieved the pooled water in the sampling puddle made by digging sediment to sample adult mud shrimp through a small hand net with a mesh size of 2 mm to collect newly settled juvenile and young shrimp with CLs less than 7 mm. The sampled shrimp were transported to the laboratory on ice under refrigerated conditions. Since burrow openings are often used to estimate the density of Gebiidean shrimp [34,43], we counted the burrow openings of the mud shrimp burrows in a 0.25 m² area using a 50 × 50 cm quadrat three times at each sampling. Before counting, we cleared away about 5 cm of the sediment surface to make the burrow openings more distinct. Typically, since U. major makes Y-shaped burrows with two openings [63], the number of openings was halved to estimate mud shrimp density.

2.3. Laboratory Work

The sampled shrimp were washed with seawater in the laboratory, the mud between their pleopods was removed using a soft brush, and the number of individuals was counted. Severely damaged specimens were converted to one per two body parts. Specimens were sexed by inspecting the following three characteristics: (1) Morphological differences in the dactylus (oblique ridges on the male medial dactyl [64]. (2) Position of the genital pores. Genital pores are usually found at the base of the coxae of the fifth pereopod in males but at the base of the third coxae in females [65]. (3) Presence of the first pleopod; a pair of first pleopods is only present in females [4,6]. Ovigerous females were also examined. Egg development was categorized into the following three stages: (1) yellow eggs without eyespots, (2) orange eggs with eyespots, and (3) hatched eggshells. Eggs were counted for 88 randomly selected ovigerous females. Parasites in the specimens were also recorded. Infections were primarily inspected in the gill chambers and abdomen, and identified according to previous references [6,66,67,68,69,70,71]. Carapace length (CL, from the tip of the rostrum to the end of the carapace) was measured in every available specimen. From those, the total length was measured (TL, from the tip of the rostrum to the posterior border of the telson) in a subset of 60 to 200 intact individuals selected each month. For specimens with a damaged carapace, we measured the telson length (from the medial anterior border to the posterior border of the telson) as an alternative. Subsequently, we used the relationship between CL and telson length $\mathrm{T}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n} \mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\left(\mathrm{m}\mathrm{m}\right)=0.38\times \mathrm{C}\mathrm{L}\left(\mathrm{m}\mathrm{m}\right)-0.99\left(R^2=0.88, n=1242\right)$ derived from randomly selected intact specimens each month to estimate the CL of damaged specimens. Length measurements were primarily conducted using a digital vernier caliper. However, we employed a stereo microscope and ocular micrometer for specimens with a CL of less than 10 mm. All measurements were accurate to 0.01 mm. Additionally, 68 specimens that had been collected and fixed in 70% ethyl alcohol by the authors from the same location, Seonjaedo in February 2011, a year prior to the present study, were processed using the same methodology and included in the analysis to get additional population information.

2.4. Population Analysis

2.4.1. Population Structure

We analyzed shrimp density, sex ratio (male:female), parasite infection rate, the presence of ovigerous females, and the season of hatching and recruitment as characteristics of the mud shrimp population. The Chi-square test (p < 0.05) was employed to ascertain if the observed sex ratios deviated from the expected 1:1 ratio overall, on a monthly basis, and by size classes.

2.4.2. Growth, Mortality, and Reproduction

Parasites may influence the characteristics of the mud shrimp population [39]. Therefore, we examined the growth, mortality, and reproduction of uninfected individuals to understand the general traits of the mud shrimp population in our study sites. Growth and mortality were analyzed based on monthly CL frequency distribution segmented into 1 mm intervals. We employed a modified von Bertalanffy growth function (VBGF), which accounts for seasonal growth curves [72].

$$L_t=L_{\mathrm{\infty }}\left[1-e^{-K\left(t-t_0\right)-\left(CK/2\pi \right)\left[\sin 2\pi \left(t-t_s\right)-\sin 2\pi \left(t_0-t_s\right)\right]}\right]$$

(1)

where $L_t$ is the length at age $t$, $L_{\infty }$ is the asymptotic length, $t_0$ is the theoretical age when $L_t=0$, $K$ is a growth constant, $C$ is the intensity of the growth oscillations, and $t_s$ is the onset of the first oscillation (relative to $t=0$).

Growth curves were estimated in females, males, and the overall population. For juvenile shrimp with a CL of less than 10 mm, where sexual morphological characteristics were not sufficiently developed to distinguish between sexes, half of the specimens were arbitrarily assigned to each sex for analysis. VBGF growth parameters ($L_{\infty }$, $K$, $t_s$, $C$) were estimated using Electronic Length Frequency Analysis (ELEFAN) I routine in R package TropFishR (version 1.6.3) [73] based on CL frequency distributions [74]. The ELEFAN_GA function, which uses the Genetic Algorithm package GA [75], was used to fit the optimized VBGF parameters. The parameter $t_0$ cannot be determined from length frequency data and, therefore, could not be estimated using ELEFAN [76]. Instead, based on the reported CL of post-settled juveniles in Tokyo Bay [4], we set $L_0$, the length at age 0, to 3.5 mm. We then determined $t_0$ using the $t_{anchor}$ parameter outputted by ELEFAN I in TropFishR, which represents a point when yearly repeating growth curves cross a length equal to zero. In relation to this, $t_s$ was also adjusted when reproducing the age-relative growth curve.

Total mortality was estimated using length-converted catch curves to account for seasonal growth [77,78]. The annual total mortality rate ($A$) and survival rate ($S$) were calculated from the estimated total mortality coefficient ($Z$) as follows.

$$A=1-e^{-z}$$

(2)

$$S=e^{-z}$$

(3)

Lifespan ($t_{\mathit{max}}$) was estimated as the time required to attain 95% $L_{\infty }$, following the definition by Taylor [79].

The recruitment patterns were obtained by backward projection of the length frequency data set onto a year time scale with the estimated VBGF [80] using the ELEFAN II routine in the FiSAT II package, and normal distribution was estimated with Hasselblad’s NORMSEP [81] in the same package [82].

2.5. Comparison of Habitat Environments of U. major Population in Other East Asian Regions

Aqua MODIS Global Mapped 11 µm Daytime Sea Surface Temperature (SST, version R2019.0) and Chlorophyll a (CHL, version R2022.0) data were obtained from NASA GIOVANNI [83,84] for 2010 to 2020 to compare regional environment factors. A moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) is mounted on Aqua (EOS PM) satellites, and it scans the Earth’s surface every 1 to 2 days, acquiring data in 36 spectral bands or groups of wavelengths [85]. We evaluated the association between these environmental factors and the characteristics of the U. major populations in different East Asian regions (

Table 1. SST and Chlorophyll a distribution in major habitats of U. major in East Asian regions obtained from NASA GIOVANNI http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/giovanni (accessed on 5 November 2023) for 2010 to 2020 [83,84].

Region	Vostok Bay, Russia	Seonjaedo, West Coast of Korea	Jugyo, West Coast of Korea	Tokyo Bay, Japan	Namhae, South Coast of Korea
Geographical position	42°54′ N, 132°43′ E	37°14′ N, 126°32′ E	36°22′ N, 126°31′ E	35°40′ N, 139°56′ E	34°54′ N, 127°55′ E
Monthly maximum SST (°C)	21.90	26.04	26.96	29.08	28.52
Monthly minimum SST (°C)	−0.23	2.65	4.08	9.73	6.92
Mean SST (°C)	10.1	14.2	14.8	19.0	17.6
Chlorophyll a (mg/m3)	3.5	5.4	7.8	12.6	7.6

).

3. Results

3.1. Environmental Factors

3.1.1. Sediment Temperature

The annual mean temperature of Seonjaedo from January 2012 to June 2014 was 13.1 °C at the sediment surface and 13.0 °C 10 cm below the surface. The highest temperatures were recorded in August 2013, at 32.0 °C at the sediment surface and 30.5 °C 10 cm below the surface. The lowest temperatures were recorded in February 2013 at −8.5 °C at the sediment surface and −2.0 °C 10 cm below the surface. In Jugyo, the annual mean temperature from March 2013 to December 2015 was 14.4 °C at the sediment surface and 14.5 °C 10 cm below the surface. The highest temperature recorded at the sediment surface was 35.0 °C in August 2013, and the highest temperature 10 cm below the surface was 30.5 °C in August 2014. The lowest temperatures, which were recorded in February 2014, were −7.0 °C at the sediment surface and 2.0 °C 10 cm below the surface. The temperature was highest in August and lowest in February at both sites. There was no difference in the average temperature at the surface and 10 cm below between the sites. However, the range of temperature at the sediment surface was broader than that 10 cm below the surface (

Table 2. Annual average, maximum, and minimum temperatures measured in the sediment using a temperature logger at the study sites.

Site	Depth	Measurement Period		Temperature (°C)
			Annual Mean	Maximum (Month Measured)	Minimum (Month Measured)
Seonjaedo	Sediment surface	January 2012 –June 2014	13.1	32.0 (August 2013)	−8.5 (February 2013)
	10 cm below sediment surface		13.0	30.5 (August 2013)	−2.0 (February 2013)
Jugyo	Sediment surface	March 2013 –December 2015	14.4	35.0 (August 2013)	−7.0 (February 2014)
	10 cm below sediment surface		14.5	30.5 (August 2014)	2.0 (February 2014)

).

3.1.2. Tidal Condition and Inundation Time

The mean tidal range of Seonjaedo was 5.393 m, whereas that of Jugyo was 4.461 m. The sampling stations were located −1.671 m from the MSL for Seonjaedo and −0.837 m for Jugyo. This corresponds to the mean low water neaps (MLWN) of the Seonjaedo and between the MSL and MLWN for Jugyo. From 2012 to 2014, the mean daily inundation time at the station in Seonjaedo was 17.3 h per day, whereas it was 16.9 h per day in Jugyo. The inundation time at the Seonjaedo station was approximately 30 min longer than that of Jugyo.

3.2. Population Structure

3.2.1. Shrimp Density

A total of 7456 mud shrimp were collected in Seonjaedo. An average of 296 shrimp per 5 m² (±65) were caught in each sampling, with a mean density of 59 individuals/m² (±13) (Figure 2a). During the same period, the average density of burrow openings was 529 openings/m² (±49). Consequently, the shrimp density was 265 individuals/m², obtained by halving the average number of burrow openings. The number of openings per catch varied monthly, ranging from 7.0 to 15.0. As a result, the ratio between the shrimp density estimated from openings and catches ranged from 3.5 to 7.5 times. On average, there were 9.4 openings per catch, and the shrimp density estimated from the openings was 4.7 times higher than that from the catches.

A total of 7823 mud shrimp were collected in Jugyo. After November 2012, an average of 183 shrimp per 5 m² (±69) were caught in each sampling, and the mean density was 37 individuals/m² (±14) (Figure 2b). The opening density was an average of 236 openings/m² (±66). Therefore, the shrimp density estimated from openings was 118 individuals/m². The number of openings per catch ranged from 2.4 to 16.6 monthly, and the ratio of the shrimp density estimated from openings and catches varied from 1.2 to 8.3. The average density of openings per catch was 7.4, and the shrimp density estimated from the openings was 3.7 times that of the catches.

A higher number of openings per catch of around 15 was mainly observed during the summer season in both study sites. The shrimp density estimated from both openings and catches was higher in Seonjaedo than in Jugyo.

The relationship between the shrimp densities estimated from burrow openings and catches differed by the sites. A significant positive correlation between the two types of densities was found in Seonjaedo, although only 26% of the variance in shrimp density estimated from catches could be explained by opening density (r = 0.51, p = 0.022, R² = 0.26) (Figure 3). However, no significant correlation was found in Jugyo (r = 0.26, p = 0.122, R² = 0.07).

3.2.2. Sex Ratios

In Seonjaedo, 4056 male and 3361 female mud shrimp were collected, along with 39 individuals of unidentified sex. The monthly average sex ratio was 1.28 (±0.31). Although the apparent male-to-female ratio varied monthly (Chi-squared for heterogeneity, X² (29, N = 7417) = 70.80, p < 0.001), there was always either no difference found between the sexes or a significantly male predominance was present (Figure 4a). In Jugyo, 3763 male mud shrimp, 3370 females, and 690 individuals of unidentified sex were collected. The monthly average sex ratio was 1.17 (±0.38). Similar to Seonjaedo, the male-to-female ratio varied monthly (X² (47, N = 7133) = 139.04, p < 0.001). Either no difference in sex was found, or males were significantly more abundant in all periods, except in April 2012, when females were more prevalent (Figure 4b). A small number of intersex individuals (less than five) possessing both the characteristic dactylus of males and a pair of first pleopods of females were found among all samples. These were categorized as unidentified sex.

There was a significant difference in CL frequency distributions between sexes in both Seonjaedo (two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, D = 0.08769, p < 0.001) and Jugyo (D = 0.20792, p < 0.001). The distribution of sexual proportions by CL class was generally close to 50:50 for small to mid sizes. However, as the size increased, the proportion became biased toward males, with this trend becoming distinctly evident from a CL of around 29 mm and higher in both study sites (Figure 5).

3.2.3. Cohort

During the study period, the CL of mud shrimp collected from Seonjaedo ranged from 2.81 to 33.95 mm. The smallest and largest individuals were collected in June 2014 and June 2013, respectively. The largest male measured 33.89 mm CL (97.26 mm TL) and the largest female measured 33.95 mm CL (107.11 mm TL). From February 2011 to January 2014, we observed a single size-group that was visually distinguishable in the monthly CL frequency distributions (Figure 6). CL in this group ranged from 5.38 mm to 13.56 mm. Since the settlements of juvenile shrimp were observed once a year in 2013 and 2014, this size group was considered to represent a yearly cohort. Moreover, based on the growth rate of the mud shrimp population in Seonjaedo (see Section 3.3.1), we estimated that this group settled in 2010. Newly settled juveniles were observed in June 2013 and June 2014. However, the 2013 settled juveniles were not found in subsequent months, and the 2014 juveniles appeared at the end of the survey period and could not be tracked further. Larger individuals, distinct in size from the 2010 cohort, such as those with CLs of 33.5 mm in March and 34.5 mm in June 2013, were found. However, these individuals were limited to only one to two specimens and were not consistently observed. As a result, the 2010 cohort remained the only abundant and consistently present cohort in Seonjaedo throughout the study period. The average CL of the cohort was about 8 mm when first observed in February 2011, and it grew to about 16 mm, 22 mm, and 26 mm after 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively.

The CLs of mud shrimp collected in Jugyo ranged from 1.50 mm to 38.21 mm during the study period. The smallest and largest individuals were observed in July 2013 and December 2013, respectively. The largest male and female measured 38.21 mm CL (109.78 mm TL) and 35.99 mm CL (106.55 mm TL). We identified two distinct size groups in a total of 47 CL frequency distributions (Figure 7). Similar to Seonjaedo, a newly settled group occurred once a year. Therefore, these size groups were considered to be yearly cohorts. In February 2012, the CLs of the earlier group ranged from 17.72 mm to 24.85 mm, with an average size of about 21 mm. It grew to 26 mm by February 2013, a year later. However, after that, growth slowed, and a similar size was observed in February 2014 as in the previous year. In February 2015, the average CL was 29 mm, and by May of the same year, it had reached approximately 30 mm, after which the number of individuals rapidly decreased. The second group first appeared in July 2014 (Figure 7). This 2014 cohort, which settled with an average CL size of 7 mm, grew to 16 mm by July 2015, a year later. By the last survey in December 2015, 17 months after their settlement, this cohort had consistently maintained their abundance, and CLs grew to 19 mm. Newly settled groups were also observed in July 2012, July 2013, and August to November 2015, but they were not observed in the subsequent months. Given that the 2014 cohort took 17 months post-settlement to grow to an approximate CL of 19 mm, the earlier group, which had an average CL size of 21 mm in February 2012, is presumed to have settled no later than 2010. Based on the growth rate of the mud shrimp population in Jugyo (see Section 3.3.1) and reports from local fishermen, we identified this size group to be the 2010 cohort.

3.2.4. Parasitic Infections

The monthly parasitic infection rate of the mud shrimp population in Seonjaedo ranged from 2.1% to 14.5%, with an average of 6.0% (±2.9%). In Jugyo, it ranged from 6.1% to 91.5%, with an average of 37.1% (±20.9%). Five species of parasites were identified in both regions: a bopyrid isopod Gyge ovalis (Shiino, 1939), a sacculinid cirriped Sacculina upogebiae Shiino, 1943, a bopyrid isopod Procepon liuruiyui An, Williams and Yu, 2009, a montacutid bivalve Peregrinamor ohshimai Shôji, 1938, and a bopyrid isopod O. griffenis. Among them, three bopyrid isopods infested the branchial chambers of the host shrimp. In contrast, S. upogebiae is an ecto-commensal and was found attached near the median line on the ventral surface of the first or second abdominal segment of the host shrimp. Peregrinamor ohshimai is also an ecto-commensal but was byssally attached to the longitudinal groove of the ventral cephalothorax of U. major with the anterior part toward the head of the host. Bopyrid isopods were highly prevalent, and G. ovalis, the most dominant parasite, accounted for over 90% of the parasites in the mud shrimp populations at both sites. The impact of these parasites on the growth of the mud shrimp will be examined in more detail by another separate paper.

3.3. Growth, Mortality, and Reproduction

3.3.1. Growth and Lifespan

The relationship between the CL and TL, based on pooled data across both sites is described by the equation $\mathrm{T}\mathrm{L}\left(\mathrm{m}\mathrm{m}\right)=3.11\times \mathrm{C}\mathrm{L}\left(\mathrm{m}\mathrm{m}\right)-2.21 (R^2=0.99, n=6945)$ (Figure 8a). The ratio of CL to TL was approximately 1:3.1. The relationship between telson length and CL is given by $\mathrm{T}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{s}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n} \mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{g}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}\left(\mathrm{m}\mathrm{m}\right)=0.38\times \mathrm{C}\mathrm{L} \left(\mathrm{m}\mathrm{m}\right)-0.99 (R^2=0.88, n=1242)$ (Figure 8b). The ratio was approximately 1:2.6.

The VBGF parameters for males, females, and the overall populations in the study sites are summarized in

Table 3. Parameter estimates obtained from the Electronic Length Frequency Analysis (ELEFAN) using the seasonally oscillating von Bertalanffy growth function (VBGF).

Parameter	Seonjaedo			Jugyo
	Pooled	Male	Female	Pooled	Male	Female
$L_{\infty }$	37.70	37.01	37.10	37.18	36.94	36.02
$K$	0.28	0.29	0.29	0.36	0.37	0.36
$T_{anchor}$	0.25	0.27	0.27	0.22	0.21	0.24
$C$	0.76	0.96	0.81	1.00	1.00	0.76
$t_s$	0.53	0.46	0.54	0.55	0.52	0.52
$WP$ (date)	0.03 (11-January)	0.96 (15-December)	0.04 (15-January)	0.05 (19-January)	0.05 (6-January)	0.09 (9-January)
$Rn max$	0.258	0.244	0.344	0.305	0.345	0.351
$\varnothing ’$	2.63	2.62	2.60	2.70	2.70	2.67

$L_{\infty }$, the asymptotic length (mm CL); $K$, the growth constant; $C$, the amplitude of seasonal growth oscillations; $WP$, the winter point, which designates the period of the year (expressed as a fraction of a year) when growth is slowest. It is related to $t_s$, which corresponds to the period of the year when growth is fastest, by the equation $WP=t_s+0.5$. $Rn$, the fitting score. $\varnothing ’$, the growth performance index.

. In both sites, $C$, representing the amplitude of seasonal growth oscillations, ranged from 0.8 to 1.0, indicating a strong amplitude in the seasonal growth oscillations of the mud shrimp populations (Table 3, Figure 9 and Figure 10). The winter point (WP) indicates that the population of both sites exhibited its most attenuated growth rate between January and February (Table 3). The growth performance index $\varnothing ’$ indicates that while the growth rates between males and females were similar within each site, the population in Jugyo exhibited a higher growth rate than that in Seonjaedo (Table 3, Figure 10).

The growth curves for the pooled data of each site suggest that the Seonjaedo mud shrimp population achieved sizes of 11.90 mm, 18.24 mm, and 23.02 mm CL at 1, 2, and 3 years post-settlement (Figure 10). In contrast, the population in Jugyo was estimated to grow to 13.73 mm, 20.86 mm, and 25.82 mm CL over the corresponding intervals, respectively. The time required for U. major to reach its ecological minimum of 25 mm CL post-settlement was estimated to be 3.41 years for the Seonjaedo population and 2.86 years for the Jugyo population (Figure 10). The estimated lifespan ($t_{\mathit{max}}$), based on the overall population data from each site, was 10.16 years in Seonjaedo and 8.00 years in Jugyo.

3.3.2. Mortality

The total mortality coefficient ($Z$) for the mud shrimp population in Seonjaedo was 1.48 for males, 2.03 for females, and 1.59 for the overall population (Figure 11a). Correspondingly, the derived annual mortality rates ($A$) were 77.2%, 86.9%, and 79.6%, respectively. In Jugyo, the total mortality coefficient ($Z$) was 1.04 for males, 1.65 for females, and 1.04 for the overall population, with annual mortality rates ($A$) of 67.4%, 80.8%, and 64.7%, respectively (Figure 11b).

3.3.3. Reproduction

In Seonjaedo, ovigerous females ranging from 23.86 mm to 29.00 mm were collected. They appeared from November 2012 to May 2013 during the winter season of 2012–2013 and from March to April 2014 during the winter season of 2013–2014 (Figure 12a). In Jugyo, the size of the ovigerous females ranged between 24.05 mm and 34.78 mm CL. The first ovigerous female was observed in May 2012, a year earlier than in Seonjaedo (Figure 12b). Subsequently, ovigerous females appeared every winter season, typically from November or December through May or June. Therefore, the brooding season of the mud shrimp population in Seonjaedo was estimated to be from November to the following May and from November to the following June in Jugyo.

The number of eggs in egg masses ranged from 2730 to 17,400, with an average count of 8057 (±3265). Egg development, consolidated monthly across all years, showed a similar pattern in both sites (Figure 12). From November, when ovigerous females first appeared, only yellow eggs without eyespots were found until January in Jugyo or February in Seonjaedo. Subsequently, the presence of orange eggs with eyespots gradually increased. Hatched eggshells were observed in both sites in May, and, notably, in June, all the eggs found in Jugyo were hatched. The recruitment pattern in both sites indicated a single annual recruitment pulse (Figure 12). The percentage of recruitment peaked in June, with 24.48% in Seonjaedo and 22.19% in Jugyo. The combined recruitment from May to July accounted for over 50%. Post-settled juveniles were only observed in June 2013 and June 2014 in Seonjaedo (Figure 12a). In contrast, in Jugyo, the appearance of juveniles occurred slightly later. They were found in July 2012 and July 2013 (Figure 12b). In 2014, they started appearing in July and were most abundant in August. They emerged even later in 2015, in August and September. Small-sized juveniles (< 7 mm CL) were also observed after October, but only a few individuals were found.

4. Discussion

4.1. Population Structure

4.1.1. Cohort

Studies on U. major populations reported three to four cohorts with the annual recruitment of newly settled juveniles [4,54]. The population of other Upogebia shrimp is typically composed of three to four cohorts, similar to that of U. major [65,86,87]. Upogebia pugettensis populations on the West Coast of the United States exhibited four to five year-classes [34]. On the other hand, the U. major populations were found to have only one to two cohorts in Seonjaedo and Jugyo (Figure 6 and Figure 7). Until June 2014, only the 2010 cohort was successfully sustained in both study sites. In other regional cases, the simultaneous presence of multiple age groups indicates that the site has been a consistently sustaining habitat for mud shrimp populations, while the occurrence of the populations in our study sites was unusual and specifically the 2010 cohort is unprecedented.

Another cause of the low number of cohorts is the recruitment failure. In our study, newly settled juveniles were found annually (Figure 12). However, successful recruitment only occurred in 2014 in Jugyo (Figure 7). Indeed, the long-term recruitment monitoring studies of burrowing shrimp (Gebiidea and Axiidea) show that even within the same area, annual recruitment can vary dramatically [43]. Recruitment involves megalopal settlement to the benthos, subsequent survival, and potential movement thereafter [43]. Factors affecting mud shrimp recruitment include reductions in spawning-capable females due to parasitic infections [39,41,42], the transport of surface waters [88], behavioral adaptations of larvae [89,90,91], the presence of adult shrimp [92], and subsequent mortality due to predation [18]. In our study sites, since newly settled larvae occurred regularly every year, the recruitment failure is presumed to be due to high subsequent mortality during the benthic juvenile stages by predation. Particularly, the extinction of the settled groups in Seonjaedo in June 2013 and Jugyo in July of the same year significantly demonstrates the predation impact at post-settlement stages (Figure 6 and Figure 7).

4.1.2. Shrimp Density

In Tokyo Bay, Japan, the density of U. major was an average of 36 individuals/m² and a maximum of 142 individuals/m² [48], and between 7 and 11 individuals/m² in Vostok Bay, Russia [54]. The shrimp density was an average of 265 individuals/m² (±24) in Seonjae-do and 118 individuals/m² (±33) in Jugyo, with maximums of 311 individuals/m² and 378 individuals/m², respectively (Figure 2). Our results are considerably higher than those reported in various studies of U. major populations in East Asia. Notably, the density in Jugyo increased significantly due to the new settlers in 2014, and in Seonjaedo, densities were maintained by individuals older than 2 years, even in the absence of recruitment (Figure 2). The density of other Upogebia species in various regional seas typically ranges from 20 individuals/m² to over 200 individuals/m². Although most studies reported U. africana (Ortmann, 1894) to have a high maximum density of 200 to 600 individuals/m² [86,93,94,95,96], the maximum density of other Upogebia such as U. pusilla (Petagna, 1792) [87,97,98], U. omissa Gomes Corrêa, 1968 [30], U. pugettensis [34], and U. deltaura (Leach, 1816) [99] is generally reported to be around 100 to 140 individuals/m². Therefore, the maximum density in our study was somewhat lower than that of U. africana, but higher than that of other Upogebia species.

Burrow opening counts are frequently used as surrogate measures of mud shrimp abundance [16,34]. In Upogebia burrows, a shrimp exhibits a solitary habit, and two to four openings per Upogebia burrow have been observed [2,16,30,100,101,102]. In our study, the average openings per shrimp in Seonjaedo and Jugyo were 9.4 and 7.4, respectively (Figure 2), which were higher than the reported value of 2 for U. major in Tokyo Bay, based on burrow casting [2]. Upogebia major may be one of the deepest burrowers in soft bottom, and their burrows may reach a depth of 2.5 m [2]. However, our sampling depth was limited to a maximum of 1 m.

Seasonal variations in number of openings per shrimp, with a decrease during the autumn and winter, have been reported in a U. pugettensis population in Willapa Bay [34]. Similar seasonal variations were also found in our study and in another report surveyed at Jugyo, being higher during the summer season [103]. Regarding the former, Dumbauld et al. [34] explained it as a result of the collapse of openings with increased wave exposure, with a decrease in shrimp activity due to lower salinity and cooler temperatures. On the other hand, the latter was suggested to be a result of shrimp behavior, burrowing more deeply to avoid the high temperatures during the summer season [103]. Considering the temperature conditions at our study sites, where the sediment surface temperature rises to 32 to 35 °C during the summer season, this suggestion seems reasonable at Seonjaedo and Jugyo as well. We assumed that shrimp burrow deeper to avoid the sampling shock and high temperatures in summer. This is related to the suggestion by Kinoshita [2] that burrows may provide mud shrimp with refuge from biological and physical stresses.

4.1.3. Sex Ratio

Reports on the sex ratio of the U. major population are scarce, but it appears to be close to 1:1. Analyses based on the sampling data revealed that the sex ratio varied monthly in Tokyo Bay and Vostok Bay (Tokyo Bay: X² (33, N = 1183) = 62.02, p < 0.01; Vostok Bay: X² (10, N = 2432) = 34.85, p < 0.001) and the results of the Chi-square test for goodness of fit to a 1:1 sex ratio for each sampling occasion indicated that significant sex bias was observed in only 18% of the total sampling in Tokyo Bay and 13% in Vostok Bay (p < 0.05) (data from [4,54]). A 1:1 sex ratio was also reported in Namhae [55]. In our study, the sex ratio was often male-biased, although it varied monthly. A significant female-bias was observed only once (Figure 4). This differs somewhat from the 1:1 sex ratio observed in other East Asian U. major populations. However, female bias has been more commonly reported in other Upogebia species (e.g., U. africana [86,104]; U. pugettensis [34]; U. omissa [105]; U. issaeffi (Balss, 1913) [106]; U. deltaura [99]; and U. pusilla [107]). Although the general pattern for Gebiidean and Axiidean shrimps is equality overall, among adults female predominance is common [108]. Aggressive intraspecific behavior and competition among males for females are considered reasons for the skewed sex ratio [30,109]. Therefore, reports of a 1:1 (e.g., U. africana [94]; U. issaeffi [106]) or a male-biased (e.g., U. pusilla [97,110]) ratio are not common. The sex ratio in mud shrimp was found to vary spatiotemporally among conspecifics [98,111]. The potential efficiency of sampling gear or methodology has been consistently presented [94,107,112,113]. Thus, the ecological significance of observed unequal sex ratios remains still unclear [107,112].

The sex ratio in marine crustaceans is more a function of animal size than other factors [114]. The present study showed a near 1:1 sex ratio up to middle size, followed by a clear male bias, with the proportion of males increasing with size (Figure 5). This pattern coincides with the “standard pattern” described by Wenner [114], where the sex ratio is equal in most size classes, but prominent deviations can occur in certain size classes due to gender-different behaviors or other reasons. The sex ratio–size pattern in Upogebia shrimp populations is highly variable [34,55,99,105,106,110,111]. Biases in primary sex ratio are thought to be influenced by evolutionary mechanisms, whereas skewed sex ratios during growth and development are considered to be a result of sex-specific ecology [115].

The equal sex ratio in initial sizes and male bias in larger sizes indicate that the skewed sex ratio in the populations in Seonjaedo and Jugyo are affected by sex-specific ecology such as growth rate and development, longevity and mortality, parasites, sex reversal, and migration [114,115]. No migration has been reported for U. major [6], and given the clear sexual dimorphism, sex reversal is not considered to occur [4]. Parasitic infection has been suggested as only a potential cause for intersex [51], and in our study, only fewer than five individuals were identified as intersex among approximately 15,000 shrimp. Additionally, in the studies from Tokyo Bay and Vostok Bay, as well as ours, there were no differences in the lifespan or growth rate of U. major between sexes, except in Namhae [4,54,55]. Female mortality was somewhat higher only in our study (Figure 11). The limited ecological characteristics of sex differences do not offer clear insight into the sex ratio characteristics in our study population. Moreover, the potential impact from diverse and limited sampling methodologies [107,112,114] may be the cause of the various sex ratio–size patterns reported in Upogebia populations. Further studies are necessary with more diverse populations and refined sampling methods to understand the ecological characteristics and causes of sex differences.

4.2. Growth, Mortality, and Longevity

4.2.1. Growth

The growth pattern and rate of U. major were reported to be similar in both sexes in Tokyo Bay and Vostok Bay [4,54], which is consistent with our study in Seonjaedo and Jugyo (Figure 10). In contrast, males were reported to have a faster growth rate than females in Namhae on the south coast of Korea [55]. In addition, the seasonal growth oscillation (C) of the shrimp population in Namhae ranged between 0.4 and 0.61, and there was a difference in WP, the slowest growth period, between males and females [55]. However, our study revealed that the seasonal oscillation (C > 0.7) was higher than in Namhae and WP occurred between December and January regardless of sex (Table 3). The values of C correlate strongly with fluctuations in habitat temperature or temperature-related environmental factors [116]. Therefore, the higher C in Seonjaedo and Jugyo compared to Namhae could be explained by wider annual fluctuations in water temperature (Table 1). Lee [55] suggested that the WP for males and females differed because they were influenced by the coolest water temperature and reproduction cycle, respectively. The present study showed that the seasonal sex-specific growth related to reproduction is not apparent. It may be due to the difference in size composition; the Namhae samples were predominantly composed of matured shrimp, but our samples included a relatively larger portion of immature shrimp (Figure 6 and Figure 7).

The growth of U. major has been studied using various methods including estimation through the VBGF and cohort analysis; therefore, we utilized the yearly growth of CL after settlement for comparison purposes [4,54,55,56]. The growth rate of the mud shrimp population in East Asia increases from higher to lower latitudes, which is especially clear in the latitude-specific CL distribution of +1-year-old shrimp after settlement (Figure 13).

The most important external factors influencing the growth of marine crustaceans are temperature and food supply [117]. Hence, the latitudinal distribution of growth rates can first be explained by the distribution of sea water temperature along latitude (Table 1). For food supply, upogebiid shrimps, including U. major, are primarily suspension feeders positively selecting diatoms, dinoflagellates, and plant and algal fragments [27,32,118,119], and also directly consume deposits in their burrowing habits [120,121,122]. Therefore, variable factors such as chlorophyll a, organic content, and suspended particles can all be indicators of potential food. As information on chlorophyll a obtained from satellite remote sensing have been widely used as one of the factors for growth modeling of filter feeder bivalves [123,124,125], we also adopted chlorophyll a as the mud shrimp growth factor because of their suspension feeding. Although chlorophyll a does not fully represent the total particulate organic matter (POM) as a food source for filter feeders, it can act as a proxy for the living organics available [126]. The annual average distribution of chlorophyll a in the habitats of U. major increases from higher to lower latitudes (Table 1). This also appears to partially explain the growth distribution of U. major across latitudes from the perspective of food supply. Population density is also one factor enabling quantitative comparisons of habitat conditions in terms of food supply. A negative relationship is found between Upogebia population density and growth [65]. This is presumed to be due to high population density inducing competition for food and space resources. However, the shrimp CLs in Vostok Bay, the northernmost region, are larger than those of Seonjaedo and Jugyo from the +2 year after settlement (Figure 13). Therefore, the regional growth differences in U. major that cannot be explained solely by the latitudinal distribution of SST or chlorophyll a, may be attributed to the significantly higher shrimp density in Seonjaedo and Jugyo compared to other regions of U. major habitats.

4.2.2. Mortality and Longevity

The lifespan of Upogebia shrimp is reported to be three to five years in other studies [48,74,75,87,100,101]. The theoretical maximum lifespan (t_max) of individual mud shrimp of the Seonjaedo and Jugyo, estimated using the VBGF, was 10.2 years and 8.0 years, respectively. Although the estimated lifespan can indicate the theoretical maximum lifespan of an individual, it is difficult to consider it as the average lifespan of the shrimp cohort. The lifespan is usually defined as the time from the first recognition of a cohort to its disappearance from the samples [127]. However, in the mud shrimp population in Tokyo Bay, the largest of the three size groups could consist of individuals from various age groups [4]. This seems to be due to the characteristics of the U. major population, which grows rapidly until reaching maturity, spawns and then lives for several years with slow growth [4], indicating the difficulty of applying age determination based on length frequency data. This length frequency-based model requires additional data or assumptions, leading to possible alternative outcomes [117]. Fortunately, in our study, only the 2010 cohort existed until 2014 in both two study sites (Figure 6 and Figure 7). Recruitment was successful only in 2014 at Jugyo, allowing for a clear distinction between the two groups (Figure 7).

The annual mortality rate was 77.2% at Seonjaedo and 67.4% at Jugyo. However, the 2010 cohort in Jugyo disappeared rapidly after June 2015, 5 years post-settlement, with only a few individuals observed until the last survey period in December 2015 (Figure 7). Therefore, we assumed that the lifespan of the shrimp cohort on the west coast of Korea is approximately five to six years after settlement. This is somewhat longer than the three-to-four-year lifespan of U. major reported in Tokyo Bay [4] and Vostok Bay [54].

4.3. Reproduction

The sizes of ovigerous females of U. major were reported as 25.1 mm to 38.9 mm CL [4,54,55]. The smallest ovigerous females at Seonjaedo and Jugyo measured 23.86 mm and 24.05 mm CL, respectively, and the largest with a size of 34.8 mm CL was found at Jugyo. This range is not significantly different from the size range of ovigerous U. major females reported (

Table 4. The breeding season, size of ovigerous females, and maturation time of Upogebia shrimp. NA indicates ‘Not Available’.

Species /Locality	Geographical Position (Lat., Lon.)	Breeding Season												Size of Ovigerous Female (mm CL)	Maturation (Year)	Reference
		J	F	M	A	M	J	J	A	S	O	N	D
U. pugettensis (Dana, 1852)
Willapa Bay, USA	46°40′ N, 123°57′ W	-	-	-	-	-					-	-	-	20–30	3	[34]
U. major (De Haan, 1841)
Vostok Bay, Russia	42°54′ N, 132°43′ E				-	-								73 (TL)	>2	[54]
Seonjaedo, west coast of Korea	37°14′ N, 126°31′ E	-	-	-	-	-							-	23.9–29.0 71.3–90.5 (TL)	2.5	Present study
Jugyo, west coast of Korea	36°22′ N, 126°30′ E	-	-	-	-	-	-						-	24.1–34.8 74.2–101.4 (TL)	2.5	Present study
Tokyo Bay, Japan	35°40′ N, 139°56′ E	-	-	-	-	-							-	25.1–34.4	>2	[4]
Namhae, south coast of Korea	34°91′ N, 127°92′ E	-	-	-	-							-	-	25.8–38.9	NA	[55]
U. vasquezi Ngoc-Ho, 1989
Northern Brazil	0°40′ S, 47°37′ W	-	-	-		-	-	-					-	NA	NA	[128]
U. yokoyai Makarov, 1938
Wakayama, Japan	33°38′ N, 135°23′ E								-	-	-			NA	NA	[129]
Hiroshima, Japan	34°21′ N, 132°21′ E					-	-	-	-	-				50–87 (TL)	2	[65]
Kochi, Japan	33°28′ N, 133°30′ E					-	-	-	-					35–52 (TL)	2	[65]
U. pusilla (Petagna, 1792)
Lagoon of Grado, Italy	45°43′ N, 13°16′ E			-	-	-	-	-	-	-				36 (TL)	2–3	[111]
Evros Delta, Greece	40°46′ N, 26°02′ E				-	-	-	-	-					39 (TL)	1	[97]
Lazaret and Strunjan, Slovenia	45°33′ N, 13°46′ E				-	-	-	-						32–40 (TL)	NA	[98]
U. africana (Ortmann, 1894)
Swartkops estuary, South Africa	33°51′ S 25°36′ E	-	-	-				-	-	-	-		-	12–17	1.5	[86]
U. omissa Gomes Corrêa, 1968
Casa Caiada Beach, Brazil	7°59′ S, 34°50′ W	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6.33	1	[110]

).

The Upogebia major in Tokyo Bay and Vostok Bay were suggested to have a maturation time of over two years [4,54]. Although the estimated time required to grow mud shrimp to 25 mm CL was 3.41 years in Seonjaedo and 2.86 years in Jugyo (Figure 10), some faster-growing individuals from the 2010 cohort in Seonjaedo began to be observed breeding as early as the winter season of 2012–2013 (Figure 6). Thus, it appears that in both Seonjaedo and Jugyo, spawning can start as early as 2.5 years after settlement.

Shrimp populations in Seonjaedo and Jugyo spawned once a year (Figure 12), somewhat consistent with results from other studies on U. major populations in East Asia [4,54,55]. The breeding season for U. major is winter to spring (Table 4). In this aspect, U. major interestingly is similar to U. pugettensis found on the West Coast of the USA but different from U. yokoyai Makarov, 1938, and U. pusilla, which breed in the summer, as well as U. africana, with a long breeding period, and U. omissa, which spawns year-round. No distinct regional variations in U. major population breeding seasons related to temperature distribution have been found from Tokyo Bay to Vostok Bay including the Korean coast (Table 4).

4.4. Consideration on the Life Cycle of Korean mud Shrimp

Gebiideans typically have five or six planktonic zoeal larval stages, ending in metamorphosis into a stage that settles and is called a megalopa. Some species show abbreviated larval development with as few as two zoeal stages [12]. Here, U. major hatches out from March to May as the first zoea and subsequently spends about 14 to 16 days in a planktonic stage, passing through another two zoeal stages prior to metamorphosis into post-larvae, megalopa [4,46,47]. The size of megalopa during the settlement period is 1.6 mm to 2.0 mm CL, and the time from hatching to settlement can be one month or longer [4,47,130]. The size of post-settlement larvae ranges from 1.5 mm to 3.0 mm CL [4] (and in the present study). They can construct their own independent burrows and the size of the burrow increases with the growth of the inhabiting shrimp [2].

The life cycle of mud shrimp based on the two study sites can be described from post-settlement through breeding, hatching, and until the disappearance of a cohort and summarized as follows: The shrimp that hatch in May or June spend about a month in a planktonic larval stage and recruit in June or July. Post-settled larvae continue to grow, reaching CLs of 11.9 mm to 13.73 mm in their first year after settlement, and 18.24 mm to 20.86 mm in the second year. The fastest-growing individuals in a cohort experience their first breeding in the winter season of the second year after settlement. In the third year, shrimp grow to CLs of 23.02 mm to 25.82 mm, mature, continue to reproduce with about 8000 eggs, and live for about five to six years after settlement.