Next Article in Journal
Deep Learning for Automated Detection of Cyst and Tumors of the Jaw in Panoramic Radiographs
Next Article in Special Issue
Quantitative Analysis of Somatostatin and Dopamine Receptors Gene Expression Levels in Non-functioning Pituitary Tumors and Association with Clinical and Molecular Aggressiveness Features
Previous Article in Journal
Effectiveness of Percutaneous Electrolysis in Supraspinatus Tendinopathy: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 9
Issue 6
10.3390/jcm9061838
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Differential Expression of MicroRNAs in Silent and Functioning Corticotroph Tumors

by
Araceli García-Martínez
1,
Antonio C. Fuentes-Fayos
2,3,4,5,
Carmen Fajardo
6,
Cristina Lamas
7,
Rosa Cámara
8,
Beatriz López-Muñoz
9,
Ignacio Aranda
10,
Raúl M. Luque
2,3,4,5 and
Antonio Picó
11,*
1
Research Laboratory, Alicante General University Hospital-Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), CIBERER, 03010 Alicante, Spain
2
Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba (IMIBIC), 14004 Córdoba, Spain
3
Department of Cell Biology Physiology and Immunology, University of Cordoba, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
4
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
5
CIBER Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition (CIBERobn), 14004 Córdoba, Spain
6
Endocrinology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Ribera, 46600 Alzira, Valencia, Spain
7
Endocrinology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, 02006 Albacete, Spain
8
Endocrinology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain
9
Endocrinology Department, Alicante General University Hospital-ISABIAL, 03010 Alicante, Spain
10
Pathology Department, Alicante General University Hospital-ISABIAL, 03010 Alicante, Spain
11
Endocrinology Department, Alicante General University Hospital-ISABIAL, Miguel Hernández University, CIBERER, 03010 Alicante, Spain
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(6), 1838; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061838
Submission received: 2 May 2020 / Revised: 4 June 2020 / Accepted: 9 June 2020 / Published: 12 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue From Molecules to Disease: Research and Clinical Advances in Pituitary and Neuroendocrine Tumors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The potential role of miRNAs in the silencing mechanisms of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) has not been addressed. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the expression levels and the potential associated role of some miRNAs, pathways, and transcription factors in the silencing mechanisms of corticotroph tumors (CTs). Accordingly, the expression of miR-375, miR-383, miR-488, miR-200a and miR-103; of PKA, MAP3K8, MEK, MAPK3, NGFIB, NURR1, PITX1, and STAT3 were analyzed via qRT-PCR in 23 silent and 24 functioning CTs. miR-200a and miR-103 showed significantly higher expression in silent than in functioning CTs, even after eliminating the bias of tumor size, therefore enabling the differentiation between the two variants. Additionally, miR-383 correlated negatively with TBX19 in silent CTs, a transcription factor related with the processing of POMC that can participate in the silencing mechanisms of CTs. Finally, the gene expression levels of miR-488, miR-200a, and miR-103 were significantly higher in macroadenomas (functioning and silent) than in microadenomas. The evidence from this study indicates that miRNAs could be involved in the pathophysiology of CTs. The translational implications of these findings suggest that pharmacological treatments specifically targeting these miRNAs could become a promising therapeutic option for these patients.

1. Introduction

Corticotroph tumors (CTs) are a pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) subtype characterized by the autonomous hypersecretion of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), which gives rise to an associated endocrine clinical syndrome called Cushing disease [1]. CTs associated with this disease are called functioning CTs. On the other hand, there are other ACTH-secreting pituitary tumors named silent CTs, which are not associated with any of the most important clinical and biochemical features of Cushing disease (i.e., hypercortisolemia) [2]. Together, CTs represent up to 17% of all PitNETs [3,4] of which approximately 45% are silent CTs [5,6]. However, the silencing mechanisms and pathogenesis of CTs remain unclear. The most feasible hypothesis lies in post-transcriptional dysregulation of the POMC gene, a precursor of ACTH [7,8,9,10,11]. However, other genetic or epigenetic alterations such as DNA methylation or microRNA (miRNA) regulation may influence the clinical behavior of this PitNET subtype. Indeed, we have recently published the effect of the DNA methylation of some tumor suppressor genes in the functionality of the CTs [12], but to the best of our knowledge, no studies have been conducted to date in order to determine the presence and potential role of miRNAs in CTs.
As small non-coding RNA molecules, miRNAs [13] are involved in the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression through their inhibitory action on messenger RNA. In the mouse corticotroph AtT-20 cell line, Zhang et al. [14] demonstrated that some miRNAs participate in the regulation of POMC expression, which is activated by the hypothalamic release of the corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) in response to environmental stimuli. CRH activates the PKA-MAP3K8-MEK-ERK1/2-NGFIB pathway together with POMC transcription, while miR-375 negatively regulates this pathway inhibiting the MAP3K8 expression [14]. In addition, other miRNAs such as miR-488, miR-383, and miR-200a have been reported as capable of inhibiting hypothalamic POMC expression [15]. Finally, it has been described in mice a transcriptional regulation of the POMC expression through the activation of the POMC promoter by transcription factors such as the bicoid-type homeodomain transcription factor pituitary homeobox 1 (PITX1) and the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), which is activated by cytokines and presents two binding sites on the POMC promoter [16].
Although some authors have also been reporting changes (up- and down-regulation) in the expression of certain miRNAs in human pituitary tumors [17,18,19,20,21,22], few have addressed the presence and potential association of miRNAs in the silencing mechanisms of silent PitNETs, specifically the CT [23]. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate, for the first time, the expression levels and potential association of miR-375, miR-383, miR-488, miR-200a, and miR-103 and the PKA-MAP3K8-MEK-ERK1/2-NGFIB pathway plus the transcription factors PITX1 and STAT3 in the silencing mechanisms of CTs.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients and Samples

We selected 47 tumors of the corticotroph line, of which 23 were silent CTs, from our collection of PitNETs according to the quantity and quality of the genetic material. We collected anonymized clinical, radiological, immunohistochemical, and molecular data from the Spanish Molecular Registry of PitNETs (REMAH) database, a multicenter clinical-basic collaborative project of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology [24]. Identification of the PitNET subtypes was performed in light of the clinical and dominant relative gene expression of the pituitary-specific hormone genes and the specific transcription factor, Tpit, as previously described [5,6,25]. We defined micro- and macroadenomas according to maximum tumor diameter (MTD) and invasiveness according to Knosp classification [26]. Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1.
The study was performed in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and other applicable legislation. The local ethics committee (CEIC General University Hospital of Alicante) approved the protocol. None of the patients were from a vulnerable population, and all donors or their relatives provided written informed consent.

2.2. DNA and RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

All molecular studies took place in the laboratory of the research institute of the General University Hospital of Alicante (ISABIAL).
All samples were preserved immediately after surgery in RNAlater solution at 4 °C for 24 h and then stored at −20 °C. Biological samples were disintegrated in the TissueLyser (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The AllPrep DNA/RNA/Protein Kit (Qiagen) was employed for manual RNA and miRNA extraction and their concentration and purity were measured in the Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
For the RNA retro-transcription reaction, 2 μg of RNA were used in a total volume of 20 μL, employing the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, California, CA, USA). For the miRNA retro-transcription reaction, 10 ng of miRNA were used in a total volume of 15 μL, by means of the TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems) with RT primers (5X) of each miRNA of interest.

2.3. Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

We performed qRT-PCR following the manufacturer’s instructions in the QuantStudio 12K (Life Technologies, California, CA, USA). The following genes and miRNAs were analyzed: PKA, MAP3K8, MEK, MAPK3, NGFIB, NURR1, PITX1, STAT3, miR-375, miR-383, miR-488, miR-200a, and miR-103.
For the quantification of miRNA expression, we used TaqMan Fast Advanced PCR Master Mix and assays based on hydrolysis probes (TaqMan Gene Expression Assays, Life Technologies). We selected the following assays (20X): has-miR-375 (000564), has-miR-200a (000502), has-miR-383 (000573), has-miR-103 (000439), and has-miR-488 (002357). As endogenous controls, we used has-miR-361 (000554) and has-miR-186 (002285). The qRT-PCR protocol was as follows: 95 °C for 20 s, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 1 s, and 60 °C for 20 s.
For the quantification of RNA expression, we used PrimeTime Gene Expression Master Mix and PrimeTime Std qPCR Assays (Integrated DNA Technologies, Iowa, USA.). The primer/probe concentration in the reaction was 1X concentrated, meaning the final concentration was 500 nM primers and 250 nM probes. The selected probes were PRKACA (PKA) (Hs.PT.58.2681637), NR4A2 (NURR1) (Hs.PT.58.704850), STAT3 (Hs.PT.58.20367494), MAP2K1 (MEK) (Hs.PT.58.19983600), MAP3K8 (Hs.PT.58.2108922), MAPK3 (ERK1) (Hs.PT.58.24504720), PITX1 (Hs.PT.58.1678716), and NR4A1 (NGFIB) (Hs.PT.58.39997829). Endogenous controls were PGK1 (Hs.PT.58v.606641) and TBP (Hs.PT.39a.22214825). The qRT-PCR protocol for IDT’s Fast Cycling was as follows: 95 °C for 3 min, 35 to 45 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, and 60 °C for 30 s. For the quantification of NEUROD1 and TBX19 mRNA expression, which our group carried out in a previous study [11], we used TaqMan Fast Advanced PCR Master Mix and an assay based on hydrolysis probes: NEUROD1 (Hs01922995_s1) and TBX19 (Hs00193027_m1) (TaqMan Gene Expression Assay, Life Technologies, California, CA, USA) and the same fast cycling protocol described above.
A pool of RNA/miRNA from nine normal pituitary samples obtained from autopsies served as a calibrator. All samples were analyzed in duplicate. We included negative controls to check that the probes did not amplify genomic DNA contaminant. The relative differences in gene expression were expressed as fold change and were obtained with the 2−ΔΔCt method (SDS software, Applied Biosystems).

2.4. Bioinformatics Analysis: miRNA Target Prediction Methods

We used three programs to predict the putative miRNA targets: miRBase (http://www.mirbase.org/), Targetscan (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_72/), and PicTar (https://pictar.mdc-berlin.de/cgi-bin/PicTar_vertebrate.cgi) (Supplementary Table S2).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

We expressed qualitative variables, including PitNET subtypes, as absolute and relative frequencies. Participant age and MTD were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). We used the Shapiro–Wilk test to assess the distribution of the molecular variables (fold change (FC)), the Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests to compare qualitative variables and non-parametric quantitative molecular variables, and the student’s t and ANOVA tests when the quantitative variables showed a normal distribution. We used Spearman and Pearson correlation tests to compare quantitative variables. The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the miRNA biomarkers. p Values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis and ROC curves were performed with SPSS 24.0 software (IBM Software, Ohio, OH, USA). All other figures were performed using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software Inc., California, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. miR200a and miR-103 as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers of Functionality in CTs

The miRNAs studied appeared up- or down-regulated in both functioning and silent CTs compared with normal pituitary glands, but only miR-200a and miR-103 showed significant differences between functioning CTs and their silent counterparts (Figure 1).
Eliminating the bias of tumor size, significant differences held between macro silent CTs and macro functioning CTs (p = 0.049 and p = 0.05, respectively). Therefore, we performed a ROC curve analysis in order to determine the potential usefulness of the expression of these two miRNAs in discriminating silent CTs from functioning CTs. Expression of both miR-200a and miR-103 enabled the differentiation between the two variants (AUC = 0.739, 95% CI 0.592 to 0.887, p = 0.007; AUC = 0.727, 95% CI 0.574 to 0.880, p = 0.011, respectively) (Supplementary Figure S1).
Additionally, in silent CTs, there were strong negative correlations between: (1) the expression of MAP3K8 and miR-488 (rho = −0.747, p < 0.001), miR-200a (rho = −0.686, p = 0.001), and miR-103 (rho = −0.782, p < 0.001); (2) the expression of MEK and miR-488 (rho = −0.605, p = 0.006) and miR-103 (rho = −0.665, p = 0.002), and (3) the expression of STAT3 and miR-383 (rho = −0.544, p = 0.016). In functioning CTs, only the miR-488 expression showed a negative correlation with the expression of NURR1 (rho = −0.531, p = 0.016), PITX1 (rho = −0.478, p = 0.033) and STAT3 (rho = −0.553, p = 0.011) (Figure 2).

3.2. TBX19 Could Be a Putative Target Gene of miR-383

Fortunately, the expression levels of TBX19 and NEUROD1, two transcription factors related with the processing of POMC, were available in the CT samples included in this study [11]. Therefore, we could compare the relationship between miR-383 and the expression of these two key genes. We found a negative correlation between miR-383 and TBX19 and a positive correlation with NEUROD1 in both functioning and silent CTs: TBX19, silent CTs rho = −0.583, p = 0.007 and functioning CTs rho = −0.470, p = 0.049; NEUROD1, silent CTs rho = 0.647, p = 0.005; functioning CTs rho = 0.445, p = 0.05. We found that NEUROD1 is a potential target for miR-383 using the three databases screened (Supplementary Table S2) according to the different computational algorithms used (Figure 3).

3.3. Expression Levels of miRNAs and Correlation with the Tumor Size of CTs

Silent CTs were significantly larger than functioning CTs (mean MTD ± standard deviation (SD): 22.44 mm ± 10.26 vs. 13.76 mm ± 9.99, p = 0.003). The gene expression levels of three miRNAs (miR-488, miR-200a, and miR-103) were significantly higher in macroadenomas (both functioning and silent) than in microadenomas (all functioning): miR-488 (p = 0.003), miR-200a (p = 0.020), and miR-103 (p = 0.049). Contrarily there were no differences in the expression levels of miR-375 and miR-383 (Figure 4a).
Indeed, there was a positive correlation between MTD and both miR-488 and miR-200a expression in the global series (rho = 0.472, p = 0.003 and rho = 0.420, p = 0.010, respectively) and in silent CTs (rho = 0.435, p = 0.035 and rho = 0.594, p = 0.005, respectively). However, there were not significant differences in the expression of both miRNAs between invasive and non-invasive corticotroph tumors (Figure 4b).

4. Discussion

The present study analyzes the expression of a subset of transcription factors, kinases, and miRNAs related with the melanocortinergic pathway and with proliferation, differentiation, and transcription regulation in a large series of functioning and silent CTs. Approximately 2000 miRNAs have been identified in humans, and these seem to regulate a third of the genes in the human genome [27]. Furthermore, miRNAs have been shown to play a relevant role in many biological processes. Indeed, the altered miRNA expression has been involved in the pathogenesis of numerous cancers. As shown in Supplementary Table S3, in PitNETs different miRNA expression patterns and potential targets of these miRNAs have been described, depending on the tumor subtypes [28,29,30]. In this way, our research provides new information on the potential role of miRNA on the silencing mechanisms in some corticotroph tumors that do not produce Cushing syndrome. Among the most relevant results obtained is the differential expression of miR-200a and miR-103 in silent CTs compared with functioning CTs, with a potential usefulness in the discrimination of both variants. Additionally, our results indicate that miR-383 is overexpressed in CTs, especially in silent CTs, and correlated negatively with TBX19, a transcription factor related with the proccesing of POMC.

4.1. miRNAs as Potential Diagnostic Biomarker of Silent CTs

As shown, miR-200a and miR-103 exhibited significantly higher expression in silent than in functioning CTs, even after eliminating the bias of tumor size, enabling the differentiation between the two variants. Given their stability in extracellular fluids, there is increasing interest in the use of miRNAs as circulating biomarkers [31], and correlations have been observed between the expression of miRNAs in serum or plasma and their expression in tumors [31,32]. However, no circulating miRNAs are being employed in the case of PitNETs. As Di Leva et al. reported in 2014 [33], since the pituitary is highly vascularized and releases hormones into the circulation, extracellular miRNAs would be useful as diagnostic biomarkers of PitNETs. Due to the distinct aggressive behavior of the PitNETs subtypes, the possibility of identifying its silent counterparts in a non-invasive way could be of great help to plan the surgical intervention. So, the tumor overexpression of miR-200a and miR-103 and the accuracy we observed in discriminating silent from functioning CTs, encourages the study of the diagnostic accuracy of its determination in peripheral blood before surgery.

4.2. Silencing Role of miRNAs in CTs

There is little data describing the role of miRNAs in the silencing mechanisms of PitNETs. Recently, Neou et al. [23] analyzed an important series of 134 PitNETs, 35 of whom were corticotroph tumors, finding that CT tumors were arranged in two clusters with different miRNA signatures, with clear differences between functioning tumors and their silent counterparts. The higher expression levels of miR-200a and miR-103 demonstrated in this study suggest that miRNAs could be involved in the silencing of this clinically relevant PitNET subtype. Since all microadenomas were functioning CTs and all silent CTs were macroadenomas, there is a bias regarding to their size. Therefore, we only compared functioning and silent macroadenomas. Excluding functioning microadenomas, miR-200a and miR-103 continued to be differentially expressed in both variants. Indeed, in silent but not in functioning CTs, we observed a strong negative correlation between miR-200a and miR-103 and the expression of a key functional gene in this PitNET subtypes such as MAP3K8. Moreover, miR-103 also correlated negatively with the expression of MEK. As previously described, the effect of CRH on POMC transcription is mediated by the MAPK pathway, which implicates different genes, such as MAP3K8 and MEK [14,34]. For that reason, miR-200a and miR-103 could be functionally connected with the POMC gene by inhibiting its expression. Indeed, in our study, both miRNAs appeared down-regulated in functioning but normo-regulated in silent CTs.
In addition, our results revealed that other miRNAs, such as miR-375, miR-488 and miR-383, could also be directly involved in the silencing of CTs. Indeed, we found a higher expression of miR-375 in silent CTs than in functioning ones, and it has been described that MAP3K8 is a direct target gene of miR-375 in AtT-20 mouse pituitary tumor cells [14]. Moreover, we observed that miR-488 was down-regulated and presented a negative correlation with NURR1, PITX1, and STAT3 (all POMC expression enhancers) in functioning CTs. Therefore, these results might suggest that miR-488 could exert a permissive effect on the expression of POMC in functioning CTs, probably through the STAT3 pathway [15,35]. In the same way, miR-383 was especially up-regulated in silent CTs and, as it showed a negative correlation with STAT3, this miRNA might also participate in the silencing mechanisms of CTs [16]. Indeed, we found that miR-383 correlated negatively with TBX19, a transcription factor necessary for the differentiation and maintenance of adult corticotroph cells [36,37] (Figure 3). Finally, as somatostatin receptor genes (SSTR2, 3 and 5) are putative targets for miR-383, and STAT3 has been proposed as a promising target candidate for pituitary tumor immunotherapy [38], our results might also suggest that miR-383 could be a therapeutic target in corticotroph PitNETs.

4.3. miRNAs: Tumor Size and Proliferation

Several miRNAs have been associated with PitNET size and growth [29]. In 2005, Bottoni et al. observed a negative correlation between tumor diameter and expression of miR-15a and miR-16-1 in somatotroph and lactotroph tumors [17]. Later, the same group described six miRNAs able to differentiate microadenomas from macroadenomas in non-secreting tumors [18]. In the same way, Butz et al. suggested that miR-629 and miR-214 may contribute to tumor growth in non-secreting pituitary tumors through an impaired regulation of apoptosis [39]. Finally, Renjie at al. demonstrated a tumor suppressor role of miR-15a, miR-16, and miR-132 in pituitary tumor cells (GH3 and MMQ cells) and in most PitNETs [40]. However, to the best of our knowledge, none of these studies has focused on the analysis of miRNAs and key regulatory genes in silent and functioning CTs. Specifically, our study revealed that miR-488, miR-200a, and miR-103 showed higher expression levels in macroadenomas than in microadenomas. As all microadenomas were functioning CTs and all silent CTs were macroadenomas, we focused on silent CTs. Thus, we found that miR-488 and miR-200a expression levels were positively correlated with tumor size, suggesting that these miRNAs could participate in the growth of these tumors. Our results are concordant with other studies reporting that miR-488 and miR200 play a role as tumor suppressor agents in several types of cancers [41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. In addition, we observed a strong negative correlation between the expression of MAP3K8 and miR-488, miR-200a and miR-103, and also between the expression of MEK and miR-488 and miR-103 in silent CTs. As MAP3K8 acts as an oncogene in numerous cancer types [48,49,50] and the MEK gene is also involved in a wide variety of cellular processes such as proliferation [51,52], the down-regulation in the expression of these miRNAs could facilitate the oncogenic effects of MAP3K8/MEK in the growth of CT PitNETs. These observations unveiled new conceptual and functional avenues in CTs, with potential therapeutic implications, which warrant further investigation.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the evidence from this study suggests that miRNAs could participate in the silencing and growth of CTs. Specifically, we demonstrated that miR-200a, miR-103, miR-375, miR-488 and miR-383 could participate in the silencing mechanisms of these clinically relevant tumors, which are not associated with Cushing syndrome. In addition, miR-488, miR-200a and miR-103 could also be involved in the growth of CTs. Altogether, the translational research implications of these findings indicate that these miRNAs might be involved in the pathophysiology of CTs, suggesting that pharmacological treatments specifically targeting these miRNAs could become a promising therapeutic option for patients in the future, and provide a relevant clinical conclusion, which should soon be tested in humans.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/6/1838/s1, Figure S1: Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves of miR-200a and miR-103. Table S1: Corticotroph tumors; Table S2: TargetScan, miRBase and PicTar results; Table S3: Main Published Studies on miRNAs expression in funcioning and non-functioning CTs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G.-M., A.C.F.-F., B.L.-M., R.M.L., and A.P.; data curation, A.G.-M. and A.P. formal analysis, A.G.-M. and A.P.; funding acquisition, A.P.; investigation, A.G.-M., B.L.-M., I.A., R.M.L., and A.P.; methodology, A.G.-M., A.C.F.-F., R.M.L., and A.P.; project administration, A.G.-M. and A.P. resources, C.F., C.L., R.C., I.A., and A.P.; supervision, R.M.L. and A.P.; validation, A.G.-M., A.P.; writing—original draft, A.G.-M., A.P.; writing—review and editing, A.C.F.-F., C.F., C.L., R.C., B.L.-M., I.A., and R.M.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by FISABIO-ISABIAL (UGP-15-197), MECD (FPU16/05059). This does not alter our adherence to Cancers policies on sharing data and materials. CIBER is an initiative of Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad, Spain.

Acknowledgments

We thank Javier Abarca Olivas (Neurosurgery Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain) and Irene Monjas (Otolaryngology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain) for their surgical contributions. We also thank the biobanks of the Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, and Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Albani, A.; Perez-Rivas, L.G.; Reincke, M.; Theodoropoulou, M. Pathogenesis of cushing disease: An update on the genetics of corticotropinomas. Endocr. Pract. 2018, 24, 907–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ben-Shlomo, A.; Cooper, O. Silent corticotroph adenomas. Pituitary 2018, 21, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Mete, O.; Cintosun, A.; Pressman, I.; Asa, S.L. Epidemiology and biomarker profile of pituitary adenohypophysial tumors. Mod. Pathol. 2018, 31, 900–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Renner, U.; Ciato, D.; Stalla, G.K. Recent advances in understanding corticotroph pituitary tumor initiation and progression. F1000Research 2018, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. García-Martínez, A.; Sottile, J.; Fajardo, C.; Riesgo, P.; Cámara, R.; Simal, J.A.; Lamas, C.; Sandoval, H.; Aranda, I.; Picó, A. Is it time to consider the expression of specific-pituitary hormone genes when typifying pituitary tumours? PLoS ONE 2018, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Sanchez-Tejada, L.; Sanchez-Ortiga, R.; Lamas, C.; Camara, R.; Riesgo, P.; Fajardo, C.; Aranda, F.I.; Pico, A. Contribution of molecular analysis to the typification of the non-functioning pituitary adenomas. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0180039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Righi, A.; Faustini-Fustini, M.; Morandi, L.; Monti, V.; Asioli, S.; Mazzatenta, D.; Bacci, A.; Foschini, M.P. The changing faces of corticotroph cell adenomas: The role of prohormone convertase 1/3. Endocrine 2017, 56, 286–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Raverot, G.; Wierinckx, A.; Jouanneau, E.; Auger, C.; Borson-Chazot, F.; Lachuer, J.; Pugeat, M.; Trouillas, J. Clinical, hormonal and molecular characterization of pituitary ACTH adenomas without (silent corticotroph adenomas) and with Cushing’s disease. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2010, 163, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Tateno, T.; Izumiyama, H.; Doi, M.; Akashi, T.; Ohno, K.; Hirata, Y. Defective expression of prohormone convertase 1/3 in silent corticotroph adenoma. Endocr. J. 2007, 54, 777–782. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17917309 (accessed on 24 May 2018). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Tateno, T.; Izumiyama, H.; Doi, M.; Yoshimoto, T.; Shichiri, M.; Inoshita, N.; Oyama, K.; Yamada, S.; Hirata, Y. Differential gene expression in ACTH-secreting and non-functioning pituitary tumors. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2007, 157, 717–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. García-Martínez, A.; Cano, D.A.; Flores-Martínez, A.; Gil, J.; Puig-Domingo, M.; Webb, S.M.; Soto-Moreno, A.; Picó, A. Why don’t corticotroph tumors always produce Cushing’s disease? Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2019, 181, 351–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. García-Martínez, A.; Sottile, J.; Sánchez-Tejada, L.; Fajardo, C.; Cámara, R.; Lamas, C.; Barberá, V.; Picó, A. DNA Methylation of tumor suppressor genes in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 104, 1272–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tutar, L.; Özgür, A.; Tutar, Y. Involvement of miRNAs and pseudogenes in cancer. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018, 1699, 45–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, N.; Lin, J.; Chen, J.; Liu, X.F.; Liu, J.L.; Luo, H.S.; Li, Y.Q.; Cui, S. MicroRNA 375 mediates the signaling pathway of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) regulating pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) expression by targeting mitogen-activated protein kinase 8. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 10361–10373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Derghal, A.; Djelloul, M.; Trouslard, J.; Mounien, L. The role of MicroRNA in the modulation of the melanocortinergic system. Front. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Drouin, J. 60 YEARS OF POMC: Transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of POMC gene expression. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2016, 56, T99–T112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bottoni, A.; Piccin, D.; Tagliati, F.; Luchin, A.; Zatelli, M.C.; Degli Uberti, E.C. miR-15a and miR-16-1 down-regulation in pituitary adenomas. J. Cell. Physiol. 2005, 204, 280–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bottoni, A.; Zatelli, M.C.; Ferracin, M.; Tagliati, F.; Piccin, D.; Vignali, C.; Calin, G.A.; Negrini, M.; Croce, C.M.; Degli Uberti, E.C. Identification of differentially expressed microRNAs by microarray: A possible role for microRNA genes in pituitary adenomas. J. Cell. Physiol. 2007, 210, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Amaral, F.C.; Torres, N.; Saggioro, F.; Neder, L.; Machado, H.R.; Silva, W.A., Jr.; Moreira, A.C.; Castro, M. MicroRNAs differentially expressed in ACTH-secreting pituitary tumors. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 94, 320–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Palumbo, T.; Faucz, F.R.; Azevedo, M.; Xekouki, P.; Iliopoulos, D.; Stratakis, C.A. Functional screen analysis reveals miR-26b and miR-128 as central regulators of pituitary somatomammotrophic tumor growth through activation of the PTEN–AKT pathway. Oncogene 2013, 32, 1651–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Garbicz, F.; Mehlich, D.; Rak, B.; Sajjad, E.; Maksymowicz, M.; Paskal, W.; Zieliński, G.; Włodarski, P.K. Increased expression of the microRNA 106b~25 cluster and its host gene MCM7 in corticotroph pituitary adenomas is associated with tumor invasion and Crooke’s cell morphology. Pituitary 2017, 20, 450–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Stilling, G.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, S.; Jin, L.; Righi, A.; Kovācs, G.; Korbonits, M.; Scheithauer, B.W.; Kovacs, K.; Lloyd, R.V. MicroRNA expression in ACTH-producing pituitary tumors: Up-regulation of microRNA-122 and -493 in pituitary carcinomas. Endocrine 2010, 38, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Neou, M.; Villa, C.; Armignacco, R.; Jouinot, A.; Raffin-Sanson, M.-L.; Septier, A.; Letourneur, F.; Diry, S.; Diedisheim, M.; Izac, B.; et al. Pangenomic Classification of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer Cell 2020, 37, 123–134.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Luque, R.M.; Ibáñez-Costa, A.; Sánchez-Tejada, L.; Rivero-Cortés, E.; Robledo, M.; Madrazo-Atutxa, A.; Mora, M.; Álvarez, C.V.; Lucas-Morante, T.; Álvarez-Escolá, C.; et al. El Registro Molecular de Adenomas Hipofisarios (REMAH): Una apuesta de futuro de la Endocrinología española por la medicina individualizada y la investigación traslacional. Endocrinología y Nutrición 2016, 63, 274–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Torregrosa-Quesada, M.E.; García-Martínez, A.; Silva-Ortega, S.; Martínez-López, S.; Cámara, R.; Fajardo, C.; Lamas, C.; Aranda, I.; Picó, A. How valuable is the RT-qPCR of pituitary-specific transcription factors for identifying pituitary neuroendocrine tumor subtypes according to the new WHO 2017 criteria? Cancers 2019, 11, 1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Knosp, E.; Steiner, E.; Kitz, K.; Matula, C. Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: A magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery 1993, 33, 610–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hammond, S.M. An overview of microRNAs. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2015, 87, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Gadelha, M.R.; Kasuki, L.; Dénes, J.; Trivellin, G.; Korbonits, M. MicroRNAs: Suggested role in pituitary adenoma pathogenesis. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2013, 36, 889–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sivapragasam, M.; Rotondo, F.; Lloyd, R.V.; Scheithauer, B.W.; Cusimano, M.; Syro, L.V.; Kovacs, K. MicroRNAs in the human pituitary. Endocr. Pathol. 2011, 22, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Feng, Y.; Mao, Z.; Wang, X.; Du, Q.; Jian, M.; Zhu, D.; Xiao, Z.; Wang, H.-J.; Zhu, Y.-H. MicroRNAs and target genes in pituitary adenomas. Horm. Metab. Res. 2018, 50, 179–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mitchell, P.S.; Parkin, R.K.; Kroh, E.M.; Fritz, B.R.; Wyman, S.K.; Pogosova-Agadjanyan, E.L.; Peterson, A.; Noteboom, J.; O’Briant, K.C.; Allen, A.; et al. Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 10513–10518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Taylor, D.D.; Gercel-Taylor, C. MicroRNA signatures of tumor-derived exosomes as diagnostic biomarkers of ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2008, 110, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Di Ieva, A.; Butz, H.; Niamah, M.; Rotondo, F.; de Rosa, S.; Sav, A.; Yousef, G.M.; Kovacs, K.; Cusimano, M.D. MicroRNAs as Biomarkers in Pituitary Tumors. Neurosurgery 2014, 75, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kovalovsky, D.; Refojo, D.; Liberman, A.C.; Hochbaum, D.; Pereda, M.P.; Coso, O.A.; Stalla, G.K.; Holsboer, F.; Arzt, E. Activation and induction of NUR77/NURR1 in corticotrophs by CRH/cAMP: Involvement of calcium, protein kinase A, and MAPK pathways. Mol. Endocrinol. 2002, 16, 1638–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Derghal, A.; Djelloul, M.; Airault, C.; Pierre, C.; Dallaporta, M.; Troadec, J.-D.; Tillement, V.; Tardivel, C.; Bariohay, B.; Trouslard, J.; et al. Leptin is required for hypothalamic regulation of miRNAs targeting POMC 3’UTR. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Lamolet, B.; Poulin, G.; Chu, K.; Guillemot, F.; Tsai, M.-J.; Drouin, J. Tpit-independent function of NeuroD1(BETA2) in Pituitary corticotroph differentiation. Mol. Endocrinol. 2004, 18, 995–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Pulichino, A.-M.; Vallette-Kasic, S.; Tsai, J.P.-Y.; Couture, C.; Gauthier, Y.; Drouin, J. Tpit determines alternate fates during pituitary cell differentiation. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 738–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Yang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Tang, J.; Li, F.; Yin, J.; Li, Y.; Fu, J.; Li, B.; Luo, Y.; et al. Biomarker discovery for immunotherapy of pituitary adenomas: Enhanced robustness and prediction ability by modern computational tools. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Butz, H.; Likó, I.; Czirják, S.; Igaz, P.; Korbonits, M.; Rácz, K.; Patócs, A. MicroRNA profile indicates downregulation of the TGFβ pathway in sporadic non-functioning pituitary adenomas. Pituitary 2011, 14, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Renjie, W.; Haiqian, L. MiR-132, miR-15a and miR-16 synergistically inhibit pituitary tumor cell proliferation, invasion and migration by targeting Sox5. Cancer Lett. 2015, 356 2 Pt B, 568–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhao, Y.; Lu, G.; Ke, X.; Lu, X.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; Ren, M.; He, S. miR-488 acts as a tumor suppressor gene in gastric cancer. Tumor Biol. 2016, 37, 8691–8698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Qiu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, H.; Guo, Z. MicroRNA-488 inhibits proliferation, invasion and EMT in osteosarcoma cell lines by targeting aquaporin 3. Int. J. Oncol. 2018, 53, 1493–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Yu, D.-L.; Zhang, T.; Wu, K.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Chen, J.; Li, X.-Q.; Peng, X.-G.; Wang, J.-N.; Tan, L.-G. MicroRNA-448 suppresses metastasis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma through targeting JAK1/STAT3 pathway. Oncol. Rep. 2017, 38, 1075–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fang, C.; Chen, Y.-X.; Wu, N.-Y.; Yin, J.Y.; Li, X.P.; Huang, H.S.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, H.-H.; Liu, Z.-Q. MiR-488 inhibits proliferation and cisplatin sensibility in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells by activating the eIF3a-mediated NER signaling pathway. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Yang, L.; Luo, P.; Song, Q.; Fei, X. DNMT1/miR-200a/GOLM1 signaling pathway regulates lung adenocarcinoma cells proliferation. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 99, 839–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Karihtala, P.; Porvari, K.; Soini, Y.; Eskelinen, M.; Juvonen, P.; Haapasaari, K.-M. Expression levels of microRNAs miR-93 and miR-200a in Pancreatic adenocarcinoma with special reference to differentiation and relapse-free survival. Oncology 2019, 96, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shi, M.; Mu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Liu, M.; Wan, J.; Qin, X.; Li, C. MicroRNA-200 and microRNA-30 family as prognostic molecular signatures in ovarian cancer. Medicine 2018, 97, e11505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, F.; Chen, N.; Xiao, R.; Wang, W.; Pan, Z. miR-144-3p serves as a tumor suppressor for renal cell carcinoma and inhibits its invasion and metastasis by targeting MAP3K8. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 480, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wei, R.; Yang, Q.; Han, B.; Li, Y.; Yao, K.; Yang, X.; Chen, Z.; Yang, S.; Zhou, J.; Li, M.; et al. microRNA-375 inhibits colorectal cancer cells proliferation by downregulating JAK2/STAT3 and MAP3K8/ERK signaling pathways. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 16633–16641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Zhang, X.; Jiang, P.; Shuai, L.; Chen, K.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Li, X. miR-589-5p inhibits MAP3K8 and suppresses CD90+ cancer stem cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 35, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Song, J.; Yang, S.; Yin, R.; Xiao, Q.; Ma, A.; Pan, X. MicroRNA-181a regulates the activation of the NLRP3 inflammatory pathway by targeting MEK1 in THP-1 macrophages stimulated by ox-LDL. J. Cell. Biochem. 2019, 120, 13640–13650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Guo, L.; Bai, Y.; Ji, S.; Ma, H. MicroRNA-98 suppresses cell growth and invasion of retinoblastoma via targeting the IGF1R/k-Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway. Int. J. Oncol. 2019, 54, 807–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Jcm 09 01838 g001 550
Figure 1. Gene expression differences (fold change) of miR-200a, miR-103, miR-488, miR-375 and miR-383 between silent CTs (corticotroph tumors) and functioning CTs. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Figure 1. Gene expression differences (fold change) of miR-200a, miR-103, miR-488, miR-375 and miR-383 between silent CTs (corticotroph tumors) and functioning CTs. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Jcm 09 01838 g001
Jcm 09 01838 g002 550
Figure 2. HeatMap between gene and pathways involved in the silencing of corticotroph tumors. (a) Functioning corticotroph tumors (n = 24); (b) Silent corticotroph tumors (n = 23). Legend of numbers associated with colors refers to the coefficients of correlation.
Figure 2. HeatMap between gene and pathways involved in the silencing of corticotroph tumors. (a) Functioning corticotroph tumors (n = 24); (b) Silent corticotroph tumors (n = 23). Legend of numbers associated with colors refers to the coefficients of correlation.
Jcm 09 01838 g002
Jcm 09 01838 g003 550
Figure 3. Correlations among TBX19, NEUROD1 and miR-383. According to this scheme, miR-383 could negatively modulate the expression of the transcription factor of the corticotroph lineage, Tpit, through the direct inhibition of TBX19 mRNA and by the indirect stimulation of NEUROD1 mRNA.
Figure 3. Correlations among TBX19, NEUROD1 and miR-383. According to this scheme, miR-383 could negatively modulate the expression of the transcription factor of the corticotroph lineage, Tpit, through the direct inhibition of TBX19 mRNA and by the indirect stimulation of NEUROD1 mRNA.
Jcm 09 01838 g003
Jcm 09 01838 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Gene expression differences (fold change) of miR-488, miR-200a, miR-103, miR-375, and miR-383 between macro and micro corticotroph tumors; (b) gene expression differences of miR-488 and miR-200a between invasive and non-invasive corticotroph tumors. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Figure 4. (a) Gene expression differences (fold change) of miR-488, miR-200a, miR-103, miR-375, and miR-383 between macro and micro corticotroph tumors; (b) gene expression differences of miR-488 and miR-200a between invasive and non-invasive corticotroph tumors. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Jcm 09 01838 g004
Table
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the studied cohort.
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the studied cohort.
GenderAgeTumor SizeInvasivenessMTD
Subtypen (%)WomenMenYearsMacroMicroYesNomm
n (%)Mean ± SDn (%)n (%)Mean ± SD
Functioning CTs24 (51.1)20 (83.3)4 (16.7)43.71 ± 11.74 11 (45.8)13 (54.2)7 (29.2)17 (70.8)13.87 ± 10.19
Silent CTs23 (48.9)16 (69.6)7 (30.4)43.30 ± 15.0423 (100)0 (0)15 (65.2)8 (34.8)21.61 ± 9.21
MTD, maximum tumor diameter; SD, standard deviation.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

García-Martínez, A.; Fuentes-Fayos, A.C.; Fajardo, C.; Lamas, C.; Cámara, R.; López-Muñoz, B.; Aranda, I.; Luque, R.M.; Picó, A. Differential Expression of MicroRNAs in Silent and Functioning Corticotroph Tumors. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1838. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061838

AMA Style

García-Martínez A, Fuentes-Fayos AC, Fajardo C, Lamas C, Cámara R, López-Muñoz B, Aranda I, Luque RM, Picó A. Differential Expression of MicroRNAs in Silent and Functioning Corticotroph Tumors. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(6):1838. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061838

Chicago/Turabian Style

García-Martínez, Araceli, Antonio C. Fuentes-Fayos, Carmen Fajardo, Cristina Lamas, Rosa Cámara, Beatriz López-Muñoz, Ignacio Aranda, Raúl M. Luque, and Antonio Picó. 2020. "Differential Expression of MicroRNAs in Silent and Functioning Corticotroph Tumors" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 6: 1838. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061838

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop