Timing of Transfusion, not Hemoglobin Variability, Is Associated with 3-Month Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke
by
, ,
Chulho Kim
1,2,*
,
Sang-Hwa Lee
1,
Jae-Sung Lim
3,
Mi Sun Oh
3,
Kyung-Ho Yu
3,
Yerim Kim
4,
Ju-Hun Lee
4,
Min Uk Jang
5,
San Jung
6 and
Byung-Chul Lee
3,* 1
Department of Neurology, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon 24253, Korea
2
Chuncheon Translational Research Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon 24252, Korea
3
Department of Neurology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang 14068, Korea
4
Department of Neurology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul 05355, Korea
5
Department of Neurology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong 18450, Korea
6
Department of Neurology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul 07440, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(5), 1566; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051566
Submission received: 5 May 2020
/
Revised: 17 May 2020
/
Accepted: 20 May 2020
/
Published: 21 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment for Stroke)
Abstract
:Objectives: This study aimed to investigate whether transfusions and hemoglobin variability affects the outcome of stroke after an acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods: We studied consecutive patients with AIS admitted in three tertiary hospitals who received red blood cell (RBC) transfusion (RBCT) during admission. Hemoglobin variability was assessed by minimum, maximum, range, median absolute deviation, and mean absolute change in hemoglobin level. Timing of RBCT was grouped into two categories: admission to 48 h (early) or more than 48 h (late) after hospitalization. Late RBCT was entered into multivariable logistic regression model. Poor outcome at three months was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score ≥3. Results: Of 2698 patients, 132 patients (4.9%) received a median of 400 mL (interquartile range: 400–840 mL) of packed RBCs. One-hundred-and-two patients (77.3%) had poor outcomes. The most common cause of RBCT was gastrointestinal bleeding (27.3%). The type of anemia was not associated with the timing of RBCT. Late RBCT was associated with poor outcome (odd ratio (OR), 3.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.43–8.79; p-value = 0.006) in the univariable model. After adjusting for age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, and stroke severity, late RBCT was a significant predictor (OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.14–9.99; p-value = 0.028) of poor outcome at three months. In the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve comparison, addition of hemoglobin variability indices did not improve the performance of the multivariable logistic model. Conclusion: Late RBCT, rather than hemoglobin variability indices, is a predictor for poor outcome in patients with AIS.
1. Introduction
Anemia is an independent predictor for mortality and cardiovascular disease in the general population [1]. The incidence of anemia in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is 20–30%, and both extreme of admission hemoglobin has a U-shaped association with poor clinical outcomes [1,2]. Cerebral autoregulation enables the brain to maintain sufficient oxygenation in the blood when the cerebral perfusion pressure decreases [3]. However, this autoregulatory response to brain ischemia is already impaired in ischemic penumbra. Thus, anemia can have harmful effects on infarct growth or poor outcome [4,5].
As the erythropoietin trial has failed to validate the efficacy of outcomes in patients with AIS [6], red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) is the only way to normalize hemoglobin in patients with anemia. However, RBCT is associated with increased blood viscosity and a proinflammatory/prothrombotic state related with stored RBC and its additives [7,8]. The impact of hemoglobin status and RBCT on acute ischemic stroke is controversial [1]. In several studies, low hemoglobin status was associated with poor outcomes in patients with AIS; however, these studies focused on admission hemoglobin level and did not assess whether RBCT was performed during the admission [1]. There are several reports on the association between RBCT and AIS outcome. Moman et al. have reported that RBCT is associated with a longer hospital stay in patients with AIS with no difference in mortality [9]. They used propensity score matching to evaluate the impact of transfusion; however, they did not assess the hemoglobin status in all participants. Kellert et al. studied the association between RBCT and mortality and 3-month outcomes in patients with AIS admitted to a neurologic intensive care unit [10]. They reported that RBCT was not associated with mortality or 3-month outcomes. Further, they did not show variation in hemoglobin levels based on RBCT. In addition, one systematic review has suggested that anemia increases the mortality rate in patients with acute stroke; however, the association between RBCT and change in hemoglobin level were not evaluated [1]. Optimal hemoglobin management in acute stroke care should not only consider admission hemoglobin levels, but also the change in hemoglobin levels and RBCT during the hospitalization. Therefore, our aim is to assess the effect of type of anemia, timing of RBCT, and hemoglobin variability index during admission on the 3-month outcomes in patients with AIS, who received RBCT.
2. Material and Methods
2.1. Study Population
This retrospective observational study included prospectively collected stroke registry patients. Three tertiary teaching hospitals, part of the Clinical Research Center to Stroke—5 database and all laboratory data and clinical outcomes were prospectively collected, and central queries were revised bimonthly [11]. This study was approved by the Hallym University Hospital IRB (No. 2017-43), and an informed consent for registry enrollment and prospective outcome capture was given by all participants or next of kin. Our stroke registry included information of consecutive patients admitted within 7 days of the onset of stroke symptom. We screened patients diagnosed with AIS between January 2015 and December 2017. AIS was diagnosed if focal neurologic deficits persisted for more than 24 h and relevant lesions were confirmed by diffusion MRI. Patients without prospective outcome capture or relevant laboratory and clinical variables were excluded from this study.
2.2. Data Collection
The prospective registry data contained only admission hemoglobin level; therefore, all sequential hemoglobin levels during the hospital admission were extracted using the clinical data warehouse. The hemoglobin level was monitored according to the 2013 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guideline. We used hemoglobin variability index as minimum, maximum, range (maximum-minimum), standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variance (CoV), median absolute deviation (MAD), and mean absolute change (MAC). Of these variability indices, MAC reflects a more temporal variation of the parameter than other variability indices [12]. Anemia was defined as a hemoglobin level of <13.0 g/dL for men and <12.0 g/dL for women according to World Health Organization criteria.
Whether the patient received RBCT was validated by filtering of the clinical data warehouse and retrospective chart review. We did not assess the administration of other blood products such as platelet concentrate or fresh frozen plasma. The criteria for determining the RBCT might vary from case to case, but they are commonly performed when hemoglobin falls below 8 g/dL. The timing of RBCT was divided into two categories—admission to 48 h (early) and >48 h after admission (late) [13]. The reason for RBCT was classified into five categories—gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, cancer-related anemia, iron-deficiency anemia (IDA)/anemia of chronic disorder (ACD), surgery/procedure-related anemia, and others. GI bleeding was defined as the bleeding from the GI tract with an evidence of bleeding on endoscopy [14]. IDA was defined as an anemia with biochemical evidence of iron deficiency. ACD was defined as an anemia associated with chronic inflammatory, infectious disease, or malignancies [15]. Anemia associated with chronic kidney disease was also classified into this category. Cancer-related anemia was defined as anemia accompanied by a newly diagnosed, active, or metastatic cancer [16]. The determination of IDA/ACD or cancer-related anemia was mutually exclusive. For example, when the patient being treated with active cancer showed the IDA/ACD pattern, it was defined as cancer-related anemia. Surgery/procedure-related anemia was defined as newly developed anemia within 24 h after surgery or procedure without evidence of the other cause [17]. Finally, anemia without obvious causes was classified as other types of anemia (Figure 1).
2.3. Statistical Analysis
We compared the baseline characteristics of patients who received early and late RBC transfusion. The patients were divided into the good (mRS 0–2) and poor (mRS 3–6) group according to the 3-month outcome. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were compared using the χ2 or t-test (Mann–Whitney U test) as appropriate. Univariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the predictors for poor outcome. The multivariable logistic regression model was used for independent variables with a p-value of <0.05 in the univariable model or with the clinical relevance. We used four different multivariable models: model 1 adjusting for age and sex; model 2 adjusting for age, sex, and the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI); model 3 adjusting for age, sex, CCI, and NIHSS; and model 4 adjusting for age, sex, CCI, NIHHS, WBC count, and fasting blood glucose. For assessing the significance of hemoglobin variability parameters, model performance for each multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC). Significant statistical differences among independent variables were considered with a p-value of 0.05 in multivariable models. All statistical analyses were performed using R (Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org).
3. Results
3.1. Baseline Characteristics
Among the 2698 patients with AIS, 592 (21.9%) were anemic at the time of admission and 132 (4.9%) received RBCT during the admission (Table S1). Patients who received RBCT were older, more likely to be male, had history of previous stroke and smoking, and a higher stroke severity and cardioembolic cause of stroke than those who did not receive RBCT. The number of patients taking anticoagulants was higher in the RBCT group, but there was no difference in the previous use of antiplatelet agents before the index stroke between the two groups.
In total, 63 of 132 (47.7%) patients received early RBCT (Table 1). The mean age of patients who received RBCT during admission was the mean (± standard deviation) of 71.6 (±13.5) years, and 46.2% patients were men. Patients who received early RBCT were less likely to have previous strokes than those who received late RBCT. CCI and NIHSS score were not different between the early and late RBCT group. The proportion of patients with poor outcome (mRS >2) at 3 months was less in the early RBCT group than in the late RBCT group.
Patients who had poor outcomes had more severe stroke, shorter onset to admission time, and had a higher WBC count and fasting blood glucose level than those with good outcomes. Patients who received intravenous thrombolysis and RBCT were in the poor outcome group (Table 2).
3.2. Type of Anemia, RBC Transfusion and Hemoglobin Variability
GI bleeding (27.3%) was the most common cause of RBCT, followed by IDA/ACD (24.2%), surgery/procedure-related anemia (20.5%), and cancer-related anemia (15.2%). Most RBCT was performed within seven days of hospitalization (Figure 2a). The type of anemia was not associated with poor outcomes (p = 0.164 for chi-square, Table 2) and the timing of RBCT (Figure 2b and Table 3). However, patients with poor outcomes were found to have received RBCT later than those with good outcomes (p = 0.009 for chi-square, Table 2). The amount of RBCT showed left-shifted distribution and was higher in the good outcome group than in the poor outcome group, but it was not statistically significant (p = 0.337 for Wilcoxon signed-rank test).
During hospitalization, 2359 hemoglobin measurements were performed for the 132 patients receiving RBCT (Table 3). The median (interquartile range (IQR)) of hemoglobin measurements in each patient with RBCT was 13 (6–13) and the number of hemoglobin measurement was more frequent in the late RBCT group than in the early RBCT group (p <0.001). Among the hemoglobin variability parameters, IQR, range, and median absolute deviation (MAD) hemoglobin levels were lower and the mean absolute change (MAC) hemoglobin levels was higher in the early RBCT group than in the late RBCT group (Table 3). Mean, median, minimum, and maximum hemoglobin levels were higher in patients with poor outcomes than in those with good outcomes (Table 2). Other hemoglobin variability parameters including IQR, range, standard deviation (SD), MAD, coefficient of variation (CoV), and MAC hemoglobin were not different between the two groups.
3.3. Predictors for Poor Outcome
The proportion of patients with poor outcomes was 78.8% (104/132). In the univariable analysis, higher NIHSS score, late RBCT was associated with poor outcomes (odds ratio (OR), 3.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.43–8.79) in univariable analysis. When we adjusted age, sex, CCI, NIHSS score, WBC count, and fasting blood sugar level, late RBCT was a significant predictor for poor outcomes (OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.14–9.99, Table 4).
Because of the high correlation between the hemoglobin variability parameters (Figure S1), the statistical significances of hemoglobin variability indices were compared to identify if the AUROC value indicating the model performance increased significantly when the hemoglobin variability parameters were added into the original logistic regression model. The performance of the original multivariable logistic regression was AUROC (0.883; 95% CI, 0.821–0.936, p <0.001). Figure 3 shows the model performance of each logistic regression model, which additionally included each hemoglobin variability parameter in the original model. However, there were no additional improvements in model performance when the hemoglobin variability indices were included in the original model.
4. Discussion
In this study, 21.9% patients with AIS were anemic at admission and 4.9% had received RBCT during hospitalization. Approximately 79% patients who received RBCT had a poor outcome at three months. The mean, median, minimum, and maximum hemoglobin levels were higher in patients with poor outcomes than in those with good outcomes. However, differences in hemoglobin variability indices, including IQR, range, SD, CoV, MAD, and MAC, did not differ between the two groups. Late RBCT was a significant predictor for poor outcome in patients with AIS in the multivariable model. However, hemoglobin variability indices were not associated with functional outcome in patients with AIS and RBCT.
We found that 5% AIS had received RBCT during hospitalization, and more than two-thirds of those had a poor outcome at three months. Additionally, late transfusion, rather than hemoglobin variability indices during hospitalization, was a significant predictor for poor outcome. Our study included all hemoglobin measurements performed during the hospital stay and differs from previous studies as we only investigated patients with AIS who had received RBCT. When analyzing the effect of hemoglobin on the AIS outcome, RBCT should be stratified RBCT or by analyzing only patients who had received RBCT.
Limited studies have assessed the relationship between the type of anemia and the functional outcome in patients with AIS. Ogata et al. have investigated the effect of GI bleeding in patients with AIS during hospitalization. Using the Fukuoka Stroke Registry, they showed that GI bleeding occurred most commonly within 1 week after the onset of stroke and was associated with poor outcome [21]. In our study, GI bleeding occurred in 38.8% patients, even after 7 days of hospitalization. As the antiplatelet agent regimen in AIS was changed and the characteristics of the patients varied in each study, there is a possibility that the prevalent period of GI bleeding may be different. However, RBCT performed to correct various causes of anemia not only during hospitalization but also at admission. In the retrospective observational study by Sharma et al., 28% of patients without anemia on admission developed anemia during admission [22]. In prospectively collected UK Regional Stroke Register data, hypochromic microcytic or normochromic normocytic anemia were associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with AIS [23]. They concluded that the type of anemia is a salient indicator of comorbidity burden. Therefore, we suggest that the type of anemia or timing of RBCT could be an important predictor of functional outcome in patients with AIS.
In general, low or high hemoglobin levels adversely affect stroke outcomes [2,22,23]. The reason that our results did not show the U-shaped relationship between hemoglobin levels and stroke outcomes was due to the difference in patient population. The previous reports have assessed admission hemoglobin levels for all patients admitted with AIS, and this study only included patients with AIS who received RBCT during the hospital stay. Likewise, when analyzing only patients who had received RBCT, we can hypothesize that the other variables, including the type of anemia, had more impact on stroke outcome than the initial hemoglobin level.
RBCT had a poorer outcome than those with early RBCT due to admission hemoglobin level not differing between early and late RBCT group; however, the IQR and range hemoglobin were higher in late transfusion group than in early RBCT group in our report. Furthermore, the number of hemoglobin measurements performed during the hospital stay was an average of 7 times in early RBCT group, but an average of 19 measurements in late RBCT group. Based on these observations, the change in hemoglobin status was higher and more abrupt in the late transfusion group than in the early RBCT group, and it can be expected that more frequent hemoglobin measurements in late RBCT group were made to monitor this rapid change. The autoregulatory mechanism for maintaining cerebral blood flow is already lost in infarct core, and that mechanism is already maximized in the penumbral area [24]. Therefore, the rapid drop in hemoglobin may further exacerbate the oligemia and cause infarct growth in penumbral area. In a study by Bellwald et al., decreased hemoglobin level after hospital arrival was associated with the amount and velocity of infarct growth in patients with AIS [25]. We did not assess infarct growth of our participants; rapid alteration of hemoglobin status in the late RBCT group may have a worse effect on the cerebral autoregulatory mechanism, which can exacerbate stroke outcome. Second, although the type of anemia was not statistically different between early and late RBCT group (p = 0.080) in our data, different cause of RBCT may affect stroke outcome. Surgery/procedure-related anemia was higher in the early RBCT group, and GI bleeding was higher in the late RBCT group in our study. However, our study did not include a large number of patients who received RBCT (only 5% in total AIS population), it should be reassessed in a larger prospective study whether this type of anemia affected stroke outcome.
In general population, history of RBCT is associated with 1.6-fold increase in the risk of ischemic stroke [26]. This association is explained by the fact that stored RBC increases blood viscosity, and decreases nitric oxide concentration, vasoconstriction, and platelet activation [1]. On the other hand, low hemoglobin is inversely correlated with initial infarct volume or infarct growth, and the author suggested that RBCT would be beneficial for recovery of stroke [1]. However, restrictive transfusion strategy in patients of cardiovascular diseases was not inferior compared to liberal strategy in two systematic review [1]. In our data, transfusion amount did change between the good and poor outcome group, though those with good outcome had low mean, median, minimum, and maximum hemoglobin compared to those with poor outcome. Our study did not directly assess the exact transfusion strategy because the study design was retrospective in nature. However, we suggested that restrictive transfusion strategies can reduce the thrombotic complication and maximize the beneficial effect by RBCT compared to the liberal strategy in AIS patients.
In our study, hemoglobin variability indices did not affect the functional outcome in patients with AIS. In the previous report, minimum or maximum hemoglobin level was associated with worse outcome [1]. However, these hemoglobin parameters did not affect the stroke outcome in our study. Kellert et al. studied the impact of low hemoglobin level and transfusion in neurologic intensive care unit patients and found that hemoglobin parameters were not associated with in-hospital mortality or 90-day functional outcomes, but they were associated with length of intensive care unit length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation [10]. The author suggested that the impact of hemoglobin parameters in neurologically severe patients might be reduced by the important predictors such as stroke severity. In our study, patients with RBCT had more severe stroke than those without RBCT (median NIHSS score 13 vs. 3). Our study also suggests that stroke severity, rather than hemoglobin parameters, is an important predictor for poor outcome in patients with severe ischemic stroke. However, as our study and Kellert’s study had a small sample size, larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these associations.
Our study had some limitations. First, our study was a small sampled-sized retrospective observation, and therefore there is a chance of selection bias and residual confounding. However, the incidence of anemia and the proportion who had received RBCT during hospitalization were comparable to other studies on patients with AIS [1]. Second, the effect of RBCT on functional outcome was likely to be underestimated because we only collected RBCT data, which were performed only during hospitalization. However, anemia usually developed 2–11 days following admission in patients with AIS [27]. Therefore, only several patients would receive RBCT after discharge.
Despite these limitations, our study had several strengths. First, we minimized residual confounding by including information such as stroke severity, type of anemia, and timing and amount of RBCT. Second, the characteristics of patients with AIS who received RBCT differ significantly compared to those who did not receive RBCT. If the rare event (such as patients with RBCT; ~5% of all AIS patients) is evaluated with logistic regression method, the results may be vulnerable to biases [28]. We solved this problem by analyzing the binary outcome only in patients with RBCT and minimized the interaction between anemia and RBCT transfusion. Third, cerebral perfusion can be changed dynamically depending on the degree of anemia and whether the RBCT is performed or not. We evaluated all hemoglobin measurements during the hospitalization. In addition, we analyzed the overall hemoglobin parameters such as SD, CoV, and MAD, and temporal variation parameter such as MAC. In addition, we identified all bleeding events during hospitalization and reflected them in the type of anemia variable.
5. Conclusions
Late RBCT was associated with 3-month poor outcome in patients with AIS. To verify this, a larger prospective study is needed for assessing the type of anemia and cause of RBCT, and the fluctuation of hemoglobin status during the admission.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/5/1566/s1, Table S1: The comparison between patients with and without red blood cell transfusion during admission, Figure S1: The correlation between hemoglobin variability parameters.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, B.-C.L.; Data curation, M.U.J.; Formal analysis, C.K., S.-H.L., J.-S.L., and M.S.O.; Funding acquisition, C.K.; Methodology, S.-H.L., Y.K., and J.-H.L.; Resources, Y.K. and S.J.; Supervision, K.-H.Y., J.-H.L., and B.-C.L.; Visualization, J.-S.L. and M.U.J.; Writing—original draft, C.K. and B.-C.L.; Writing—review & editing, M.S.O., K.-H.Y., and S.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the National Research Fund of Korea (NRF-2019R1G1A1097707), the Hallym University Research Fund (HURF-2019-54), and a grant from the CJ healthcare Corp (2018-12-031). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Sarnak, M.J.; Tighiouart, H.; Manjunath, G.; MacLeod, B.; Griffith, J.; Salem, D.; Levey, A.S. Anemia as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease in the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2002, 40, 27–33. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, C.C.; Zhang, S.T.; Tan, G.; Zhang, S.H.; Liu, M. Impact of anemia on in-hospital complications after ischemic stroke. Eur. J. Neurol. 2018, 25, 768–774. [Google Scholar]
- Powers, W.J. Cerebral hemodynamics in ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Ann. Neurol. 1991, 29, 231–240. [Google Scholar]
- Tsai, C.F.; Yip, P.K.; Chen, C.C.; Yeh, S.J.; Chung, S.T.; Jeng, J.S. Cerebral infarction in acute anemia. J. Neurol. 2010, 257, 2044–2051. [Google Scholar]
- Kellert, L.; Herweh, C.; Sykora, M.; Gussmann, P.; Martin, E.; Ringleb, P.A.; Steiner, T.; Bösel, J. Loss of penumbra by impaired oxygen supply? Decreasing Hemoglobin levels predict infarct growth after acute ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc. Dis. Extra 2012, 2, 99–107. [Google Scholar]
- Ehrenreich, H.; Weissenborn, K.; Prange, H.; Schneider, D.; Weimar, C.; Wartenberg, K.; Schellinger, P.D.; Bohn, M.; Becker, H.; Wegrzyn, M.; et al. Recombinant human erythropoietin in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2009, 40, e647–e656. [Google Scholar]
- Goel, R.; Patel, E.U.; Cushing, M.M.; Frank, S.M.; Ness, P.M.; Takemoto, C.M.; Vasovic, L.V.; Sheth, S.; Nellis, M.E.; Shaz, B.; et al. Association of perioperative red blood cell transfusions with venous thromboembolism in a North American registry. JAMA. Surg. 2018, 153, 826–833. [Google Scholar]
- Byrnes, J.R.; Wolberg, A.S. Red blood cells in thrombosis. Blood 2017, 130, 1795–1799. [Google Scholar]
- Moman, R.N.; Kor, D.J.; Chandran, A.; Hanson, A.C.; Schroeder, D.R.; Rabinstein, A.A.; Warner, M.A. Red blood cell transfusion in acute brain injury subtypes: An observational cohort study. J. Crit. Care 2019, 50, 44–49. [Google Scholar]
- Kellert, L.; Schrader, F.; Ringleb, P.; Steiner, T.; Bösel, J. The impact of low hemoglobin levels and transfusion on critical care patients with severe ischemic stroke STroke: Relevant impact of HemoGlobin, Hematocrit and Transfusion (STRAIGHT)—An observational study. J. Crit. Care 2014, 29, 236–240. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J.Y.; Kang, K.; Kang, J.; Koo, J.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, B.J.; Kim, W.J.; Kim, E.G.; Kim, J.G.; Kim, J.M.; et al. Executive summary of stroke statistics in Korea 2018: A report from the epidemiology research council of the Korean stroke society. J. Stroke 2019, 21, 42–59. [Google Scholar]
- Kohnert, K.D.; Heinke, P.; Fritzsche, G.; Vogt, L.; Augstein, P.; Salzsieder, E. Evaluation of the mean absolute glucose change as a measure of glycemic variability using continuous glucose monitoring data. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2013, 15, 448–454. [Google Scholar]
- Chelemer, S.B.; Prato, B.S.; Cox Jr., P.M.; O’Connor, G.T.; Morton, J.R. Association of bacterial infection and red blood cell transfusion after coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2002, 73, 138–142. [Google Scholar]
- Raju, G.S.; Gerson, L.; Das, A.; Lewis, B.; American Gastroenterological Association (AGA). Institute medical position statement on obscure gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology 2007, 133, 1694–1696. [Google Scholar]
- Weiss, G.; Goodnough, L.T. Anemia of chronic disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 1011–1023. [Google Scholar]
- Ludwig, H.; Van, B.S.; Barrett-Lee, P.; Birgegård, G.; Bokemeyer, C.; Gascón, P.; Kosmidis, P.; Krzakowski, M.; Nortier, J.; Olmi, P.; et al. The European Cancer Anaemia Survey (ECAS): A large, multinational, prospective survey defining the prevalence, incidence, and treatment of anaemia in cancer patients. Eur. J. Cancer 2004, 40, 2293–2306. [Google Scholar]
- Valeri, C.R.; Dennis, R.C.; Ragno, G.; Macgregor, H.; Menzoian, J.O.; Khuri, S.F. Limitations of the hematocrit level to assess the need for red blood cell transfusion in hypovolemic anemic patients. Transfusion 2006, 46, 365–371. [Google Scholar]
- Sulter, G.; Steen, C.; De Keyser, J.D. Use of the Barthel index and modified Rankin Scale in acute stroke trials. Stroke 1999, 30, 1538–1541. [Google Scholar]
- Wityk, R.J.; Pessin, M.S.; Kaplan, R.F.; Caplan, L.R. Serial assessment of acute stroke using the NIH Stroke Scale. Stroke 1994, 25, 362–365. [Google Scholar]
- Jansen, I.G.; Mulder, M.J.; Goldhoorn, R.-J.B. Endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in routine clinical practice: Prospective, observational cohort study (MR CLEAN registry). BMJ. 2018, 360, k949. [Google Scholar]
- Ogata, T.; Kamouchi, M.; Matsuo, R.; Kuroda, J.; Ago, T.; Sugimori, H.; Inoue, T.; Kitazono, T.; Fukuoka Stroke Registry. Gastrointestinal bleeding in acute ischemic stroke: Recent trends from the Fukuoka stroke registry. Cerebrovasc. Dis. Extra 2014, 4, 156–164. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, K.; Johnson, D.J.; Johnson, B.; Frank, S.M.; Stevens, R.D. Hemoglobin concentration does not impact 3-month outcome following acute ischemic stroke. BMC. Neurol. 2018, 18, 78. [Google Scholar]
- Barlas, R.S.; McCall, S.J.; Bettencourt-Silva, J.H.; Clark, A.B.; Bowles, K.M.; Metcalf, A.K.; Mamas, M.A.; Potter, J.F.; Myint, P.K. Impact of anaemia on acute stroke outcomes depends on the type of anaemia: Evidence from a UK stroke register. J. Neurol. Sci. 2017, 383, 26–30. [Google Scholar]
- Yamada, S.; Koizumi, A.; Iso, H.; Wada, Y.; Watanabe, Y.; Date, C.; Yamamoto, A.; Kikuchi, S.; Inaba, Y.; Kondo, T.; et al. History of blood transfusion before 1990 is a risk factor for stroke and cardiovascular diseases: The Japan collaborative cohort study (JACC study). Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2005, 20, 164–171. [Google Scholar]
- Jordan, J.D.; Powers, W.J. Cerebral autoregulation and acute ischemic stroke. Am. J. Hypertens. 2012, 25, 946–950. [Google Scholar]
- Bellwald, S.; Balasubramaniam, R.; Nagler, M.; Burri, M.S.; Fischer, S.D.A.; Hakim, A.; Dobrocky, T.; Yu, Y.; Scalzo, F.; Heldner, M.R.; et al. Association of anemia and hemoglobin decrease during acute stroke treatment with infarct growth and clinical outcome. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0203535. [Google Scholar]
- Abe, A.; Sakamoto, Y.; Nishiyama, Y.; Suda, S.; Suzuki, K.; Aoki, J.; Kimura, K. Decline in Hemoglobin during hospitalization may be associated with poor outcome in acute stroke patients. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2018, 27, 1646–1652. [Google Scholar]
- Bradburn, M.J.; Deeks, J.J.; Berlin, J.A.; Russell Localio, A. Much ado about nothing: A comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events. Stat. Med. 2007, 26, 53–77. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1.
Type of anemia according to cause of anemia or morphological analysis of erythrocytes. * Patients with anemia of chronic disease were classified as cancer-related anemia when they had active cancer. Hb: hemoglobin; IDA: iron-deficiency anemia; ACD: anemia of chronic disease. We included the additional laboratory results that can affect the hemoglobin levels and anemia status: white blood cell (WBC) and platelet counts; blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and blood glucose levels; international normalized ratio; and blood pressure. The functional outcome was assessed by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months [18], and stroke severity was measured using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at admission [19]. The primary outcome was poor outcome at 3 months, which was defined the mRS score of 3–6 [20]. Secondary analysis was performed to assess the significance of each hemoglobin variability parameters during admission in poor outcome prediction.
Figure 1.
Type of anemia according to cause of anemia or morphological analysis of erythrocytes. * Patients with anemia of chronic disease were classified as cancer-related anemia when they had active cancer. Hb: hemoglobin; IDA: iron-deficiency anemia; ACD: anemia of chronic disease. We included the additional laboratory results that can affect the hemoglobin levels and anemia status: white blood cell (WBC) and platelet counts; blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and blood glucose levels; international normalized ratio; and blood pressure. The functional outcome was assessed by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months [18], and stroke severity was measured using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at admission [19]. The primary outcome was poor outcome at 3 months, which was defined the mRS score of 3–6 [20]. Secondary analysis was performed to assess the significance of each hemoglobin variability parameters during admission in poor outcome prediction.
Figure 2.
The timing of red blood cell transfusion and the relationship of type of anemia between early and late red blood cell transfusion: (a) The frequency of red blood cell transfusion performed after hospitalization (X-axis means the timing (days) of RBCT after admission; Y-axis means the number of subjects who received red blood cell transfusion). (b) The differences of proportion in type of anemia according to the timing of the red blood cell transfusion (early vs. late).
Figure 2.
The timing of red blood cell transfusion and the relationship of type of anemia between early and late red blood cell transfusion: (a) The frequency of red blood cell transfusion performed after hospitalization (X-axis means the timing (days) of RBCT after admission; Y-axis means the number of subjects who received red blood cell transfusion). (b) The differences of proportion in type of anemia according to the timing of the red blood cell transfusion (early vs. late).
Figure 3.
Receiver operating characteristics curve showing performances of original logistic regression model and the other models with hemoglobin variability parameter. The original model was the final logistic regression model in Table 4. The area under the curve of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) of the original model was 0.883. AUROC of mean (A), median (B), minimum (C), and maximum (D) hemoglobin-adjusted models were 0.884, 0.885, 0.889, and 0.882, respectively. TPR: true positive rate; FPR: false positive rate; Hb: hemoglobin.
Figure 3.
Receiver operating characteristics curve showing performances of original logistic regression model and the other models with hemoglobin variability parameter. The original model was the final logistic regression model in Table 4. The area under the curve of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUROC) of the original model was 0.883. AUROC of mean (A), median (B), minimum (C), and maximum (D) hemoglobin-adjusted models were 0.884, 0.885, 0.889, and 0.882, respectively. TPR: true positive rate; FPR: false positive rate; Hb: hemoglobin.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of the participants.
| Parameters | Early Transfusion (n = 63) | Late Transfusion (n = 69) | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 68.6 ± 16.3 | 74.4.1 ± 9.7 | 0.450 |
| Male | 30 (47.6%) | 31 (44.9%) | 0.893 |
| Past medical history | |||
| Stroke | 16 (25.4%) | 30 (43.5%) | 0.002 |
| Hypertension | 41 (65.1%) | 52 (75.4%) | 0.270 |
| Diabetes | 17 (27.0%) | 23 (33.3%) | 0.546 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 18 (28.6%) | 20 (29.0%) | 0.985 |
| Current smoking | 19 (30.2%) | 12 (17.4%) | 0.128 |
| Charlson comorbidity index | 5.0 (3.0–7.0) | 5.0 (4.0–7.0) | 0.221 |
| Stroke subtype | 0.116 | ||
| Cardioembolic | 14 (22.2%) | 25 (36.2%) | |
| Non-cardioembolic | 49 (77.8%) | 44 (63.8%) | |
| NIHSS score | 9.0 (2.5–16.0) | 13.0 (6.0–18.0) | 0.091 |
| Thrombolysis | 9 (14.3%) | 6 (8.7%) | 0.461 |
| Onset to visit time, hour | 3.7 (1.2–30.0) | 4.9 (1.0–30.5) | 0.879 |
| Laboratory parameter | |||
| WBC, 103/μL | 9.1 ± 4.5 | 9.4 ± 4.3 | 0.660 |
| Platelet, 103/μL | 280 ± 152 | 234 ± 111 | 0.050 |
| BUN, mg/dL | 22.2 ± 15.6 | 22.5 ± 16.9 | 0.926 |
| Creatinine, mg/dL | 1.2 ± 1.3 | 1.3 ± 1.2 | 0.614 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 147.0 ± 49.7 | 160.0 ± 48.3 | 0.130 |
| TG, mg/dL | 95.5 ± 55.2 | 113.0 ± 55.5 | 0.078 |
| HDL, mg/dL | 45.6 ± 13.2 | 42.0 ± 11.8 | 0.108 |
| LDL, mg/dL | 90.3 ± 41.2 | 92.6 ± 42.9 | 0.759 |
| FBS, mg/dL | 133.0 ± 57.3 | 139.0 ± 55.9 | 0.574 |
| INR | 1.2 ± 0.7 | 1.3 ± 0.9 | 0.816 |
| Systolic BP, mmHg | 140 ± 25 | 140 ± 28 | 0.997 |
| Diastolic BP, mmHg | 81.8 ± 13.7 | 78.9 ± 17.3 | 0.284 |
| History of antithrombotics usage | 23 (36.5%) | 34 (49.3%) | 0.193 |
| Poor outcome (mRS >2) | 43 (68.3%) | 61 (88.4%) | 0.009 |
Categorical variables are represented by the number (column percent), and continuous variable are represented by mean (± standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) as appropriate. SD: standard deviation; iqr: interquartile range; NIHSS: National Institute of Health Stroke Scale; WBC: white blood cell, BUN: blood urea nitrogen; TG: triglycerides; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; FBS: fasting blood sugar; INR: international normalized ratio; BP: blood pressure; mRS: modified Rankin Scale.
Table 2.
The comparison of clinical and laboratory parameters between good and poor outcome group.
| Parameters | Poor (n = 104) | Good (n = 28) | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 70.1 ± 14.9 | 72.0.1 ± 13.2 | 0.514 |
| Male | 43 (41.3%) | 18 (64.3%) | 0.051 |
| Past medical history | |||
| Stroke | 39 (37.5%) | 7 (25.0%) | 0.313 |
| Hypertension | 75 (72.1%) | 18 (64.3%) | 0.567 |
| Diabetes | 34 (32.7%) | 6 (21.4%) | 0.358 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 29 (27.9%) | 9 (32.1%) | 0.836 |
| Current smoking | 21 (20.2) | 10 (35.7) | 0.142 |
| Stroke subtype | 0.718 | ||
| Cardioembolic | 32 (30.8%) | 7 (25.0%) | |
| Non-cardioembolic | 70 (68.6%) | 23 (76.7%) | |
| NIHSS, score | 13.0 (7.0–18.0) | 3.0 (1.0–4.5) | <0.001 |
| Thrombolysis | 15 (14.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.072 |
| onset to visit time, hour | 3.2 (0.9–26.0) | 12.9 (3.2–61.7) | 0.012 |
| Laboratory parameter | |||
| WBC, 103/μL | 9.7 ± 4.6 | 7.4 ± 2.7 | 0.011 |
| Platelet, 103/μL | 246 ± 127 | 292 ± 152 | 0.102 |
| BUN, mg/dL | 21.5 ± 14.8 | 25.8 ± 20.6 | 0.211 |
| Creatinine, mg/dL | 1.2 ± 1.3 | 1.3 ± 0.9 | 0.878 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 157.0 ± 50.2 | 142.0 ± 44.3 | 0.178 |
| TG, mg/dL | 103.0 ± 53.5 | 109.0 ± 63.4 | 0.558 |
| HDL, mg/dL | 44.5 ± 12.1 | 40.3 ± 13.7 | 0.120 |
| LDL, mg/dL | 93.6 ± 43.5 | 84.0 ± 35.5 | 0.290 |
| FBS, mg/dL | 143.0 ± 58.7 | 110.0 ± 37.5 | 0.006 |
| INR | 1.3 ± 0.9 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 0.274 |
| Systolic BP, mmHg | 143.0 ± 26.6 | 132.0 ± 24.4 | 0.058 |
| Diastolic BP, mmHg | 81.2 ± 16.2 | 77.0 ± 13.4 | 0.211 |
| History of antithrombotics usage | 46 (44.2%) | 11 (39.3%) | 0.780 |
| Number of Hb measure | 13.0 (6.0–23.5) | 8.0 (5.8–19.3) | 0.309 |
| Admission Hb, g/dL | 9.7 ± 2.6 | 8.8 ± 2.5 | 0.129 |
| Hb variability parameter | |||
| Mean, g/dL | 10.2 ± 1.5 | 9.4 ± 1.2 | 0.012 |
| Median, g/dL | 10.2 ± 1.5 | 9.5 ± 1.2 | 0.018 |
| Minimum, g/dL | 8.0 ± 1.8 | 7.2 ± 1.4 | 0.025 |
| Maximum, g/dL | 12.2 ± 1.9 | 11.3 ± 1.7 | 0.026 |
| IQR, g/dL | 1.6 ± 0.9 | 1.6 ± 0.9 | 0.806 |
| Range, g/dL | 4.2 ± 1.9 | 4.1 ± 1.6 | 0.889 |
| SD, g/dL | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 1.4 ± 0.5 | 0.640 |
| MAD, g/dL | 1.1 ± 0.7 | 1.2 ± 0.7 | 0.529 |
| CoV, % | 12.9 ± 4.8 | 14.4 ± 4.5 | 0.134 |
| MAC, g/dL | 0.7 ± 0.4 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.165 |
| Type of anemia | 0.164 | ||
| GI bleeding | 24 (23.1) | 12 (42.9) | |
| Cancer-related | 18 (17.3) | 2 (7.1) | |
| IDA or ACD | 24 (23.1) | 8 (28.6) | |
| Surgery/Procedure-related | 23 (22.1) | 4 (14.3) | |
| Others | 15 (14.4) | 2 (7.1) | |
| Transfusion amount, mL | 400 (400–800) | 800 (400–1140) | 0.337 |
| Timing of transfusion | 0.009 | ||
| Early (≤ 48 h) | 43 (41.3%) | 20 (71.4%) | |
| Late (> 48 h) | 61 (58.7%) | 8 (28.6%) |
Categorical variables are represented by the number (column percent) and continuous variable are represented by mean (± standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) as appropriate. NIHSS: National Institute of Health Stroke Scale; WBC: white blood cell; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; TG: triglycerides; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; FBS: fasting blood sugar; INR: international normalized ratio; BP: blood pressure; Hb: hemoglobin; IQR: interquartile range; SD: standard deviation; MAD: median absolute deviation; CoV: coefficient of variation; MAC: mean absolute change; GI: gastrointestinal; IDA: iron deficiency anemia; ACD: anemia of chronic disorder.
Table 3.
The comparison of hemoglobin variability parameters and type of anemia between early and late transfusion group.
Table 3.
The comparison of hemoglobin variability parameters and type of anemia between early and late transfusion group.
| Parameters | Early Transfusion (n = 63) | Late Transfusion (n = 69) | Total (n =132) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Hb measure, number | 7.0 (4.0–14.0) | 19.0 (10.0–30.0) | 13.0 (6.0–23.0) | <0.001 |
| Admission Hb, mg/dL | 9.4 ± 2.7 | 9.6±2.5 | 9.5 ± 2.6 | 0.639 |
| Hb variability parameter | ||||
| Mean, mg/dL | 10.1 ± 1.8 | 9.9 ± 1.1 | 10.0 ± 1.5 | 0.391 |
| Median, mg/dL | 10.3 ± 1.9 | 9.9 ± 1.1 | 10.1 ± 1.5 | 0.109 |
| Minimum, mg/dL | 8.2 ± 2.1 | 7.6 ± 1.3 | 7.9 ± 1.7 | 0.065 |
| Maximum, mg/dL | 11.7 ± 1.9 | 12.3 ± 1.8 | 12.0 ± 1.9 | 0.052 |
| IQR, mg/dL | 1.3 ± 0.8 | 1.8 ± 1.0 | 1.9 ± 0.6 | 0.004 |
| Range, mg/dL | 3.5 ± 1.6 | 4.7 ± 1.8 | 4.1 ± 1.8 | <0.001 |
| SD, mg/dL | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 1.4 ± 0.5 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 0.292 |
| MAD, mg/dL | 1.0 ± 0.7 | 1.3 ± 0.7 | 0.5 ± 0.5 | 0.025 |
| CoV, % | 12.6 ± 4.8 | 13.7 ± 4.7 | 13.2 ± 4.8 | 0.212 |
| MAC, mg/dL | 0.8 ± 0.4 | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 0.4 ± 0.3 | 0.004 |
| Type of anemia | 0.080 | |||
| GI bleeding | 12 (19.0) | 24 (34.8) | 36 (27.3) | |
| Cancer-related | 10 (15.9) | 10 (14.5) | 20 (15.2) | |
| IDA or ACD | 17 (27.0) | 15 (21.7) | 32 (24.2) | |
| Surgery/Procedure-related | 18 (28.6) | 9 (13.0) | 27 (20.5) | |
| Others | 6 (9.5) | 11 (16.0) | 17 (12.9) | |
| Transfusion amount, mL | 400 (400–800) | 640 (400–1120) | 400 (400–840) | 0.448 |
Categorical variables are represented by the number (column percent) and continuous variable are represented by mean (± standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) as appropriate. Hb: hemoglobin; IQR: interquartile range; SD: standard deviation; MAD: median absolute deviation; CoV: coefficient of variation; MAC: mean absolute change; GI: gastrointestinal; IDA: iron deficiency anemia; ACD: anemia of chronic disorder.
Table 4.
The predictors of poor outcome in multivariable logistic regression analysis according to the timing of the transfusion.
Table 4.
The predictors of poor outcome in multivariable logistic regression analysis according to the timing of the transfusion.
| Crude Model | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | p | OR (95% CI) | p | OR (95% CI) | p | OR (95% CI) | p | OR (95% CI) | p | |
| Late transfusion | 3.55 (1.43–8.79) | 0.006 | 3.61 (1.42–9.19) | 0.007 | 3.65 (1.43–9.29) | 0.007 | 3.21 (1.14–9.09) | 0.028 | 3.37 (1.14–9.99) | 0.028 |
| Age | 1.00 (0.97–1.03) | 0.983 | 1.00 (0.96–1.03) | 0.806 | 0.99 (0.95–1.04) | 0.694 | 0.98 (0.93–1.03) | 0.403 | ||
| Male | 0.38 (0.16–0.93) | 0.035 | 0.38 (0.15–0.92) | 0.033 | 0.43 (0.16–1.17) | 0.099 | 0.42 (0.15–1.21) | 0.109 | ||
| CCI | 1.04 (0.86–1.27) | 0.677 | 1.06 (0.84–1.35) | 0.629 | 1.07 (0.83–1.39) | 0.592 | ||||
| NIHSS | 1.22 (1.11–1.34) | <0.001 | 1.19 (1.08–1.31) | <0.001 | ||||||
| WBC, 103/μL | 1.16 (0.98–1.37) | 0.089 | ||||||||
| FBS, mg/dL | 1.01 (1.00–1.02) | 0.189 | ||||||||
Model 1 adjusted for age and sex; Model 2 included variables in Model 1 plus Charlson comorbidity index; Model 3 included variables in Model 2 plus National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score; Model 4 included variables in Model 3 plus white blood cell count and fasting blood sugar. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; CCI: Charlson comorbidity index; NIHSS: National Institute of Health Stroke Scale; WBC: white blood cell; FBS: fasting blood sugar.
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Kim, C.; Lee, S.-H.; Lim, J.-S.; Oh, M.S.; Yu, K.-H.; Kim, Y.; Lee, J.-H.; Jang, M.U.; Jung, S.; Lee, B.-C. Timing of Transfusion, not Hemoglobin Variability, Is Associated with 3-Month Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1566. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051566
AMA Style
Kim C, Lee S-H, Lim J-S, Oh MS, Yu K-H, Kim Y, Lee J-H, Jang MU, Jung S, Lee B-C. Timing of Transfusion, not Hemoglobin Variability, Is Associated with 3-Month Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(5):1566. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051566
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, Chulho, Sang-Hwa Lee, Jae-Sung Lim, Mi Sun Oh, Kyung-Ho Yu, Yerim Kim, Ju-Hun Lee, Min Uk Jang, San Jung, and Byung-Chul Lee. 2020. "Timing of Transfusion, not Hemoglobin Variability, Is Associated with 3-Month Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 5: 1566. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051566
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
