Next Article in Journal
Antimycobacterial, Enzyme Inhibition, and Molecular Interaction Studies of Psoromic Acid in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Efficacy and Safety Investigations
Previous Article in Journal
A Comprehensive Feature Analysis of the Fetal Heart Rate Signal for the Intelligent Assessment of Fetal State
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 7
Issue 8
10.3390/jcm7080224
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation Assistance Interacts Synergistically with Carbapenem for Clostridium difficile Infection in Critically Ill Patients

by
Shyh-Ren Chiang
1,2,†,
Chih-Cheng Lai
3,†,
Chung-Han Ho
4,5,
Chin-Ming Chen
6,7,
Chien-Ming Chao
3,
Jhi-Joung Wang
4 and
Kuo-Chen Cheng
1,8,*
1
Department of Internal Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, 71004 Tainan, Taiwan
2
Department of General Education, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, 71710 Tainan, Taiwan
3
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, 73657 Liouying, Taiwan
4
Department of Medical Research, Chi Mei Medical Center, 71004 Tainan, Taiwan
5
Department of Hospital and Health Care Administration, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, 71710 Tainan, Taiwan
6
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, 71004 Tainan, Taiwan
7
Departments of Recreation and Healthcare Management, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, 71710 Tainan, Taiwan
8
Department of Safety, Health, and Environmental Engineering, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology, 71703 Tainan, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors had equal contributions.
J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7(8), 224; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7080224
Submission received: 20 July 2018 / Revised: 11 August 2018 / Accepted: 19 August 2018 / Published: 20 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Infectious Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Objectives: Interactions between mechanical ventilation (MV) and carbapenem interventions were investigated for the risk of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in critically ill patients undergoing concurrent carbapenem therapy. Methods: Taiwan’s National Intensive Care Unit Database (NICUD) was used in this analytical, observational, and retrospective study. We analyzed 267,871 intubated patients in subgroups based on the duration of MV support: 7–14 days (n = 97,525), 15–21 days (n = 52,068), 22–28 days (n = 35,264), and 29–60 days (n = 70,021). The primary outcome was CDI. Results: Age (>75 years old), prolonged MV assistance (>21 days), carbapenem therapy (>15 days), and high comorbidity scores were identified as independent risk factors for developing CDI. CDI risk increased with longer MV support. The highest rate of CDI was in the MV 29–60 days subgroup (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 2.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.46–5.58; p < 0.02). Moreover, higher CDI rates correlated with the interaction between MV and carbapenem interventions; these CDI risks were increased in the MV 15–21 days (AHR = 2.58; 95% CI = 1.12–5.91) and MV 29–60 days (AHR = 4.63; 95% CI = 1.14–10.03) subgroups than in the non-MV and non-carbapenem subgroups. Conclusions: Both MV support and carbapenem interventions significantly increase the risk that critically ill patients will develop CDI. Moreover, prolonged MV support and carbapenem therapy synergistically induce CDI. These findings provide new insights into the role of MV support in the development of CDI.

1. Introduction

Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is widely known as a major causal agent of antibiotic-associated colitis [1,2]. Despite current therapeutic options, C. difficile infection (CDI) has become one of the most common causes of hospital-acquired infection [3]. A dramatic increase in the incidence and severity over the past decades, especially in critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs), has been reported [4,5,6]. Therefore, understanding the pathogenesis and avoiding the risk factors for CDI are critically important for clinicians.
CDI is believed to be precipitated by antimicrobial therapy, the most significant risk factor [7,8], which causes a disruption of the normal colonic microbiota; this disruption predisposes patients to C. difficile intestinal colonization [9,10]. Old age, underlying chronic disease, recent hospitalization, gastrointestinal surgeries, and tube feeds were also identified as risk factors associated with C. difficile [6,11]. The pathogenesis of CDI is currently attributed to multifactorial disease processes: gut microbial dysbiosis, pathogenic toxin production, and altered host inflammatory responses [9,12,13]. Recent reports highlighted that host immune system interactions with C. difficile, rather than the C. difficile burden, might be important for determining disease processes and outcomes [14]. Indeed, an excessive host inflammatory response is believed to be crucial for the pathogenesis of CDI [10,13,15,16].
To provide life support for critically ill patients in ICUs, mechanical ventilation (MV) assistance is indispensable. However, clinicians must consider the development of ventilator-associated lung injury (VALI) in patients with MV support [17,18]. Moreover, MV not only initiates lung injury and inflammation, but it also leads to a spillover of the inflammatory mediators from the lungs into the circulation, which propagates a systemic inflammatory response [19,20]. Significant inflammatory responses of the lungs to mechanical stretching can also synergistically interact with a second insult, e.g., exposure to microbial agents or systemic inflammation [21,22] that harms extrapulmonary organs.
MV support and antibiotic therapy might be the two most common interventions in ICUs. However, the role and risk of MV assistance in developing CDI in critically ill patients are largely unclear. MV has been established as a risk factor for the development of CDI in a few studies [23,24], but MV was not a significant risk factor after potential confounders had been adjusted for [5]. Thus, how and why MV support drives CDI is unknown; this also raises another question, i.e., whether MV assistance interacts with antibiotic therapy to provoke CDI in the critically ill patients. We investigated the risk factors for CDI and interactions between MV support and carbapenem therapy in critically ill ICU patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Source

The NICUD, a sub-database of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), was our data source. The NICUD contains information on all ICU patients from 1997 to 2013 and is based on the Taiwan National Health Insurance program, which covers almost 100% of the population of Taiwan. Detailed information on inpatients and outpatients was obtained from International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnostic codes. All patients listed in the database are de-identified; thus, the Chi Mei Medical Center Institutional Review Board exempted us from having to obtain patient consents.

2.2. Patient Selection

Throughout the study period, 2,415,207 patients had been admitted to ICUs. Because most admitted patients were less than 18 years old, of unknown gender, or non-intubated, or CDI was coded before ICU admission, which included MV support less than seven or more than sixty days, or died within seven days after ICU admission, 2,147,336 were excluded. The remaining 267,871 patients were screened, and 254,882 patients with MV support were enrolled (Figure 1).

2.3. Measurements

The main event in this study was CDI in ICU intubated patients with or without carbapenem therapy. Follow-up time was calculated from the ICU admission date of the ICU stay to date of death or date of developing CDI within three months after ICU admission. Demographic and clinical characteristics (age, gender, congestive heart failure (CHF) (ICD-9-CM: 398.91, 402.01, 402.11, 402.91, 404.01, 404.03, 404.11, 404.13, 404.91, 404.93, 425.4–425.9, and 428), cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (ICD-9-CM: 436–438), chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) (ICD-9-CM: 490–492, and 496), liver disease (ICD-9-CM: 571), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (ICD-9-CM: 585), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, days of MV support, and days of carbapenem (imipenem and meropenem)) therapy, were also estimated as potential risk factors for CDI. To examine the effect of MV support and antibiotics therapy on the risk of CDI, the interactions between MV support and antibiotics were also estimated.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

A t test for continuous variables and a χ2 test for categorical variables were used to compare the demographic data, underlying comorbidities, and CDI between patients who had and had not undergone MV. The risk of CDI between these two cohorts was estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression. To consider the possible effects of all confounding factors, the adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) was calculated using Cox regression analysis with the adjustment for multiple variables, including age, gender, MV assistance, antibiotics therapy, comorbidities and CCI scores. Subgroup analyses for antibiotics therapy, MV assistance, duration of MV, and interaction of MV with antibiotics were also performed. Finally, a forest plot was used to determine the risk of CDI for interactions between the duration of MV assistance and antibiotics. Significance was set at p < 0.05 (two-tailed). SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for all statistical analyses.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Data

A total of 267,871 intubated patients in ICUs were enrolled in this study, including MV patients (n = 254,882) and controls without MV support (non-MV; n = 12,989). MV patients were subgrouped by MV duration: 7–14 days (n = 97,525), 15–21 days (n = 52,068), 22–28 days (n = 35,264), and 29–60 days (n = 70,021) (Figure 1).
Individual data in comparable distributions of MV cases and controls (non-MV) by age, sex, carbapenem therapy, ICU days, comorbidities, CCI, and mortality (Table 1). The following variables differed significantly between the MV and non-MV groups: patient age (69.1 vs. 63.7 years old, p < 0.0001), female gender (37.9% vs. 43.4%, p < 0.0001), carbapenem therapy (30.8% vs. 10.6%, p < 0.0001), ICU stay time (11 vs. 2 days, p < 0.0001), comorbidity and CCI scores (p < 0.0001). The hospital and one-year mortality rates were also higher in the MV group than in the non-MV group (34.0% vs. 32.9%, p = 0.0118, and 59.2% vs. 52.7%, p < 0.0001, respectively). CDI developed in 435 of 267,871 patients (0.16%); the MV group had a significantly higher rate of CDI than did the non-MV group (0.17% vs. 0.07%, p = 0.0069) (Table 1).
The AHRs of CDI were significantly higher with age ≥75 years old (AHR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.12–1.83; p = 0.0041), prolonged MV support (22–28 days: AHR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.17–4.68, p = 0.017, and 29–60 days: AHR = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.21–4.69, p = 0.0117), carbapenem therapy more than 15 days (AHR = 1.88; 95% CI = 1.54–2.30; p < 0.0001), and high comorbidity scores (CCI 1–2: AHR = 1.62; 95% CI = 1.24–2.10; p < 0.0004, and CCI ≥ 3: AHR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.22–2.24; p < 0.0012). These variables were identified as independent risk factors for developing CDI (Table 2).

3.2. Analysis of the Risk of Developing CDI with Interactions between MV Support and Carbapenem Therapy

Both carbapenem therapy and MV support were identified as risk factors for developing CDI. Compared with the CDI risk in patients without carbapenem or MV intervention, the AHRs for developing CDI were significantly higher with carbapenem therapy (AHR = 1.92; 95% CI = 1.59–2.32; p < 0.0001) and MV support (AHR = 2.19; 95% CI = 1.13–4.24; p = 0.0199) (Table 3). Additionally, a progressive increase in CDI risk from the MV 22–28 days subgroup (AHR = 2.72; 95% CI = 1.36–5.44; p = 0.0046) to the MV 29–60 days subgroup (AHR = 2.85; 95% CI = 1.46–5.58; p = 0.0023) correlated with prolonged MV assistance (>21 days) for developing CDI. Furthermore, patients given carbapenem monotherapy (AHR = 1.99, 95% CI = 0.41–9.60, p = 0.3898) or MV support (AHR = 1.94, 95% CI = 0.91–4.11, p = 0.0857) had nonsignificantly higher risks for CDI than did the non-MV and carbapenem subgroups. In contrast, there was a significant increase of the risk in the subgroup given both MV and carbapenem interventions (AHR = 3.64; 95% CI = 1.71–7.75; p < 0.0008) (Table 3).

3.3. Analysis of Synergistic Interactions between the Duration of MV Assistance and Carbapenem Therapy for CDI

A higher but nonsignificant CDI risk correlated with carbapenem monotherapy (Figure 2). However, the CDI risks concurrent with MV and carbapenem interventions were significantly higher in the MV 7–14 days (AHR = 3.15; 95% CI = 1.43–6.96) and MV 15–21 days (AHR = 2.58; 95% CI = 1.12–5.92) subgroups. The CDI rate was positively associated with prolonged MV duration (>21 days) and concurrent carbapenem therapy.
The difference between the 22–28 days MV subgroup (AHR = 3.84; 95% CI = 1.69–8.73) to the 29–60 days MV subgroup (AHR = 4.63; 95% CI = 1.14–10.03) was significant (Figure 2). These results show the risk of developing CDI because of the synergistic interaction between prolonged MV support and concurrent carbapenem therapy.

4. Discussion

Our most important finding was that prolonged MV (>21 days) and prolonged carbapenem therapy (>15 days) are independent predictors of CDI. One study [24] reported that the duration of acute MV greatly influenced the development of CDI, and prolonged MV (>3 weeks) was associated with a significantly higher (2–3 times) CDI risk (AHR: 2.72 for MV 22–28 days and AHR: 2.85 for MV 29–60 days) compared with patients without MV. Moreover, after prescribing carbapenem, synergistic interactions between prolonged MV and carbapenem therapy resulted in a significant increase in CDI risk (AHR: 3.84 for MV 22–28 days and AHR: 4.63 for MV 29–60 days). This is the first study to report a synergistic interaction between MV and antibiotics therapy that resulted in an increased risk of CDI. These findings provide novel insights and might support interactions between prolonged MV and antibiotic therapy for the development of CDI.
A dramatic and significantly higher (2–4 times) incidence of CDI was reported in the past decade in North America [25,26]. The reported incidence of CDI in North American and European ICUs is 0.4–4% of the ICU population [27]. We found that 435 of 267,871 (0.16%) critically ill patients developed CDI. This was lower than the previously reported rate (14/1488 (0.9%)) in Taiwan [27]. However, because of the different sample populations and different methodologies used, the incidence rate in the present study might be reasonable.
After a multivariate analysis, elderly patients (>75 years old) (AHR: 1.43, p = 0.004) and patients with prolonged MV (22–28 MV days (AHR: 2.34, p = 0.015), 29–60 MV days (AHR = 2.39, p = 0.0117)), long-duration carbapenem therapy (>15 days (AHR = 1.88, p < 0.001)) and a high CCI were at a high risk for developing CDI.
Advanced age is an established risk factor for CDI [28,29]. Indeed, age-related susceptibility to CDI with a 2% increase in the rate every additional year after 18 years old was reported [7]. Multiple interacting factors might be correlated with age in patients with CDI, such as comorbidities [30], polypharmacy interactions [23], progressive immune dysregulation due to old age, and aging accompanied by immune senescence with diminished antibodies against C. difficile toxins [31], which leads to the high risk in elderly patients.
Antibiotic interactions are an important risk factor for developing CDI. Because almost any type of antibiotic therapy can lead to this infection [10], carbapenem therapy, the last resort for treating bacterial infections resistant to other available antibiotics, was evaluated in our study. Critically ill patients might be treated with several antibiotics before beginning carbapenem therapy. Thus, patients given carbapenem therapy might have advanced infections and prolonged inflammation.
A cumulative burden of comorbid illness assessment, based on the CCI with scores of 1 (moderate), 2 (severe), and ≥3 (very severe) [32], showed significant differences in the risk for CDI between these three groups (p = 0.018). Consistent with other reports, the high CCI score was associated with a high risk of developing CDI and sepsis [33,34,35], which led to CDI after antibiotic therapy.
Both prolonged carbapenem therapy and MV support were identified as independent risk factors for developing CDI. Moreover, a longer duration of MV (>21 days) contributed to a higher CDI risk with carbapenem therapy (AHR: 3.84 in the MV 22–28 days (AHR: 3.84) and MV 29–60 days (AHR: 4.63)) compared with patients without MV and carbapenem interventions. These findings provided important evidence of a synergistic interaction between MV and carbapenem therapy that increases the risk of CDI. The specific mechanisms responsible for the synergistic interactions between prolonged MV and carbapenem merit further investigation and might, in part, contribute to several mechanisms, including: First, critically ill ICU patients with prolonged MV are primarily the elderly with comorbidities and repeated episodes of shock and infection during their ICU stay [36,37]. This condition was associated with persistent inflammation, immunosuppression, and catabolism syndrome that resulted in an increased susceptibility to CDI [38,39]. Second, these patients have more infections with virulent and resistant nosocomial pathogens. Nosocomial pneumonia is the most important infectious disease in patients who require prolonged MV [39]. Prolonged MV patients are more vulnerable to infections with virulent and resistant nosocomial pathogens that require long-term and broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment, which render patients more susceptible to CDI [36,40]. Third, increased permeability and local neutrophilic infiltration of the gut by organ crosstalk is suspected in prolonged MV patients. The release of inflammatory mediators followed by increased neutrophilic infiltration and permeability of the gut are important for developing CDI [41,42,43]. Moreover, MV propagates systemic inflammatory responses, which results in neutrophil recruitment, which, in turn, leads to distal organ damage [44]. Additionally, one study reported that increases in plasma tumor necrosis factor-alpha after MV led to increases in gut permeability [45]. Indeed, a crosstalk between the lungs and the gut during MV was reported [46]. Fourth, cooperation and synergism between transcriptional factors and sensors of innate immunity between MV and CDI are suspected. Synergistic interactions of bacterial products and MV, even in conventional tidal volumes, for lung injury have been reported [47,48]. Indeed, cooperation and synergism for transcriptional factors is currently thought to be the underlying molecular mechanism that causes the combined effect of the two insults [22]. Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) activation contribute to inflammatory responses in CDI [49]. Interestingly, cell stretching in MV can activate similar signaling pathways (MAPK, NF-κB) as CDI to produce proinflammatory cytokines [22]. Moreover, activating the innate immune sensors, or pattern-recognition receptors (Toll-like receptor family: TLR-2, TLR-4, and TLR-5), is important for developing CDI [16,50]. These TLRs also contribute to the molecular mechanism of barotrauma in MV. Indeed, MV increased the expression of TLR-2 both in the lungs and systemically after Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia was reported in an animal study [51].

Limitations

Our study has some limitations. First, we identified CDI cases based on diagnostic codes provided by physicians in an administrative database; however, there is a possibility of coding errors and misdiagnoses. Second, some CDI variables, e.g., using proton pump inhibitors or tube feeds, and the burden of C. difficile spores, were not recorded in the claims database; thus, we were unable to assess the possibility of residual confounding factors. Third, we were unable to assess adherence to the prescribed medications because the drug use data were not recorded in the claims database.

5. Conclusions

Patient age, carbapenem therapy, high CCI, and prolonged MV were identified as potential risk factors for developing CDI by critically ill ICU patients. Moreover, prolonged MV interacted synergistically with carbapenem therapy to induce CDI. Recognizing the causal relationship between MV and CDI might be important for CDI therapy programs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-R.C. and K.-C.C.; Methodology, S.-R.C., C.-C.L., C.-M.C. (Chin-Ming Chen), C.-M.C. (Chien-Ming Chao) and J.-J.W.; Investigation, S.-R.C. and C.-H.H.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, S.-R.C. and C.-C.L.; Writing-Review & Editing, K.-C.C.

Acknowledgments

Availability of supporting data: The data on the study population that were obtained from the NHIRD (https://nhird.nhri.org.tw/en/) are maintained in the NHRI (http://nhird.nhri.org.tw/). The NHIRD is limited for research purposes only. Applicants must follow the Computer-Processed Personal Data Protection Law (http://www.winklerpartners.com/?p=987) and related regulations of National Health Insurance Administration. All applications are reviewed for approval of data release. Interested researchers may submit queries related to data access to [email protected].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CDIClostridium difficile infection
NICUDNational Intensive Care Unit Database
MVmechanical ventilation

References

  1. Beaugerie, L.; Flahault, A.; Barbut, F.; Atlan, P.; Lalande, V.; Cousin, P.; Cadilhac, M.; Petit, J.C.; Study Group. Antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and Clostridium difficile in the community. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2003, 17, 905–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Blondeau, J.M. What have we learned about antimicrobial use and the risks for Clostridium difficile -associated diarrhoea? J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2009, 63, 238–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Miller, B.A.; Chen, L.F.; Sexton, D.J.; Anderson, D.J. Comparison of the burdens of hospital-onset, healthcare facility-associated Clostridium difficile infection and of healthcare-associated infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in community hospitals. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2011, 32, 387–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ang, C.W.; Heyes, G.; Morrison, P.; Carr, B. The acquisition and outcome of ICU-acquired Clostridium difficile infection in a single centre in the UK. J. Infect. 2008, 57, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lawrence, S.J.; Puzniak, L.A.; Shadel, B.N.; Gillespie, K.N.; Kollef, M.H.; Mundy, L.M. Clostridium difficile in the intensive care unit: Epidemiology, costs, and colonization pressure. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2007, 28, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lessa, F.C.; Gould, C.V.; McDonald, L.C. Current status of Clostridium difficile infection epidemiology. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 55 (Suppl. 2), S65–S70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Loo, V.G.; Bourgault, A.M.; Poirier, L. Host and pathogen factors for Clostridium difficile infection and colonization. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 1693–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Rupnik, M.; Wilcox, M.H.; Gerding, D.N. Clostridium difficile infection: New developments in epidemiology and pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7, 526–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sun, X.; Hirota, S.A. The roles of host and pathogen factors and the innate immune response in the pathogenesis of Clostridium difficile infection. Mol. Immunol. 2015, 63, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Denève, C.; Janoir, C.; Poilane, I.; Fantinato, C.; Collignon, A. A New trends in Clostridium difficile virulence and pathogenesis. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2009, 33 (Suppl. 1), S24–S28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lo Vecchio, A.; Zacur, G.M. Clostridium difficile infection: An update on epidemiology, risk factors, and therapeutic options. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2012, 28, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Monaghan, T.M. New perspectives in Clostridium difficile disease pathogenesis. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2015, 29, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Péchiné, S.; Collignon, A. Immune responses induced by Clostridium difficile. Anaerobe 2016, 41, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. El Feghaly, R.E.; Stauber, J.L.; Deych, E.; Gonzalez, C.; Tarr, P.I.; Haslam, D.B. Markers of intestinal inflammation, not bacterial burden, correlate with clinical outcomes in Clostridium difficile infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 56, 1713–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Solomon, K. The host immune response to Clostridium difficile infection. Ther. Adv. Infect. Dis. 2013, 1, 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Madan, R.; Petri, W.A., Jr. Immune responses to Clostridium difficile infection. Trends Mol. Med. 2012, 18, 658–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Slutsky, A.S.; Ranieri, V.M. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 2126–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ricard, J.D.; Dreyfuss, D.; Saumon, G. Ventilator-induced lung injury. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2002, 8, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Slutsky, A.S.; Tremblay, L.N. Multiple system organ failure. Is mechanical ventilation a contributing factor? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1998, 157 Pt 1, 1721–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ranieri, V.M.; Giunta, F.; Suter, P.M.; Slutsky, A.S. Mechanical ventilation as a mediator of multisystem organ failure in acute respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA 2000, 284, 43–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. O’Mahony, D.S.; Liles, W.C.; Altemeier, W.A.; Dhanireddy, S. Mechanical ventilation interacts with endotoxemia to induce extrapulmonary organ dysfunction. Crit. Care 2006, 10, R136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Charles, P.E.; Barbar, S.D. Toll-like receptors: A link between mechanical ventilation, innate immunity and lung injury? Intens. Care Med. 2010, 36, 909–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Dubberke, E.R.; Reske, K.A.; Yan, Y.; Olsen, M.A.; McDonald, L.C.; Fraser, V.J. Clostridium difficile—associated disease in a setting of endemicity: Identification of novel risk factors. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 45, 1543–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zilberberg, M.D.; Nathanson, B.H.; Sadigov, S.; Higgins, T.L.; Kollef, M.H.; Shorr, A.F. Epidemiology and outcomes of Clostridium difficile-associated disease among patients on prolonged acute mechanical ventilation. Chest 2009, 136, 752–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. McDonald, L.C.; Owings, M.; Jernigan, D.B. Clostridium difficile infection in patients discharged from US short-stay hospitals, 1996–2003. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Pépin, J.; Valiquette, L.; Alary, M.E.; Villemure, P.; Pelletier, A.; Forget, K.; Pépin, K.; Chouinard, D. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in a region of Quebec from 1991 to 2003: A changing pattern of disease severity. CMAJ 2004, 171, 466–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lee, J.C.; Hung, Y.P.; Lin, H.J.; Tsai, P.J. Clostridium difficile infections in medical intensive care units of a medical center in southern Taiwan: Variable seasonality and disease severity. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0160760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Olsen, M.A.; Young-Xu, Y.; Stwalley, D.; Kelly, C.P.; Gerding, D.N.; Saeed, M.J.; Mahé, C.; Dubberke, E.R. The burden of Clostridium difficile infection: Estimates of the incidence of CDI from U.S. Administrative databases. BMC Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cohen, S.H.; Gerding, D.N.; Johnson, S. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society of healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of america (IDSA). Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2010, 31, 431–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Jump, R.L. Clostridium difficile infection in older adults. Aging Health 2013, 9, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kelly, C.P. Can we identify patients at high risk of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18 (Suppl. 6), 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Charlson, M.E.; Pompei, P.; Ales, K.L.; MacKenzie, C.R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J. Chron. Dis. 1987, 40, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dubberke, E.R.; Reske, K.A. Evaluation of Clostridium difficile-associated disease pressure as a risk factor for C difficile-associated disease. Arch. Intern. Med. 2007, 167, 1092–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bader, M.S. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in older adults: Predictors of 7-day mortality and infection with a methicillin-resistant strain. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2006, 27, 1219–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zavascki, A.P.; Barth, A.L.; Fernandes, J.F.; Moro, A.L.; Gonçalves, A.L.; Goldani, L.Z. Reappraisal of Pseudomonas aeruginosa hospital-acquired pneumonia mortality in the era of metallo-beta-lactamase-mediated multidrug resistance: A prospective observational study. Crit. Care 2006, 10, R114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Loss, S.H.; de Oliveira, R.P.; Maccari, J.G.; Savi, A.; Boniatti, M.M.; Hetzel, M.P. The reality of patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation: A multicenter study. Rev. Bras. Ter. Intens. 2015, 27, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Estenssoro, E.; Reina, R.; Canales, H.S. The distinct clinical profile of chronically critically ill patients: A cohort study. Crit. Care 2006, 10, R89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Nelson, J.E.; Cox, C.E.; Hope, A.A. Chronic critical illness. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2010, 182, 446–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Rumbak, M.J. Pneumonia in patients who require prolonged mechanical ventilation. Microbes Infect. 2005, 7, 275–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kalb, T.H.; Lorin, S. Infection in the chronically critically ill: Unique risk profile in a newly defined population. Crit. Care Clin. 2002, 18, 529–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kelly, C.P.; Becker, S.; Linevsky, J.K.; Joshi, M.A.; O’Keane, J.C.; Dickey, B.F.; LaMont, J.T.; Pothoulakis, C. Neutrophil recruitment in Clostridium difficile toxin A enteritis in the rabbit. J. Clin. Investig. 1994, 93, 1257–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Naaber, P.; Mikelsaar, R.H.; Salminen, S.; Mikelsaar, M. Bacterial translocation, intestinal microflora and morphological changes of intestinal mucosa in experimental models of Clostridium difficile infection. J. Med. Microbiol. 1998, 47, 591–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Moore, R.; Pothoulakis, C.; LaMont, J.T.; Carlson, S.; Madara, J.L. C. difficile toxin A increases intestinal permeability and induces Cl-secretion. Am. J. Physiol. 1990, 259, G165–G172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Koyner, J.L.; Murray, P.T. Mechanical ventilation and the kidney. Blood Purif. 2010, 29, 52–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Guery, B.P.; Welsh, D.A.; Viget, N.B.; Robriquet, L.; Fialdes, P.; Mason, C.M.; Beaucaire, G.; Bagby, G.J.; Neviere, R. Ventilation-induced lung injury is associated with an increase in gut permeability. Shock 2003, 19, 559–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Quílez, M.E.; López-Aguilar, J.; Blanch, L. Organ crosstalk during acute lung injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and mechanical ventilation. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2012, 18, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Altemeier, W.A.; Matute-Bello, G.; Gharib, S.A.; Glenny, R.W.; Martin, T.R.; Liles, W.C. Modulation of lipopolysaccharide-induced gene transcription and promotion of lung injury by mechanical ventilation. J. Immunol. 2005, 175, 3369–3376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Dreyfuss, D.; Soler, P.; Saumon, G. Mechanical ventilation-induced pulmonary edema. Interaction with previous lung alterations. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1995, 151, 1568–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Cowardin, C.A.; Petri, W.A., Jr. Host recognition of Clostridium difficile and the innate immune response. Anaerobe 2014, 30, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Jafari, N.V.; Kuehne, S.A.; Minton, N.P.; Allan, E.; Bajaj-Elliott, M. Clostridium difficile-mediated effects on human intestinal epithelia: Modelling host-pathogen interactions in a vertical diffusion chamber. Anaerobe 2016, 37, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Barbar, S.D.; Pauchard, L.A.; Bruyère, R.; Bruillard, C.; Hayez, D. Mechanical ventilation alters the development of Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia in rabbit. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0158799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jcm 07 00224 g001 550
Figure 1. Data from the National Intensive Care Unit Database (NICUD), a sub-database of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), was used in this study.
Figure 1. Data from the National Intensive Care Unit Database (NICUD), a sub-database of the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), was used in this study.
Jcm 07 00224 g001
Jcm 07 00224 g002 550
Figure 2. Forest plot of interacted results for the risk of C. difficile infection between the mechanical ventilation support and carbapenem therapy in critically ill ICU patients.
Figure 2. Forest plot of interacted results for the risk of C. difficile infection between the mechanical ventilation support and carbapenem therapy in critically ill ICU patients.
Jcm 07 00224 g002
Table
Table 1. The characteristics of the enrolled patients in this study.
Table 1. The characteristics of the enrolled patients in this study.
CharacteristicTotal (n = 267,871)MV (n = 254,882)Non-MV (n = 12,989)p
Age (years): mean ± SD68.8 ± 16.769.1 ± 16.563.7 ± 19.6<0.0001
18–6487,675 (32.73)82,120 (32.22)5555 (42.77)<0.0001
65–7461,383 (22.92)58,616 (23.00)2767 (21.30)
≥75118,813 (44.35)114,146 (44.78)4667 (35.93)
Gender
Female102,217 (38.16)96,574 (37.89)5643 (43.44)<0.0001
Male165,654 (61.84)158,308 (62.11)7346 (56.56)
Carbapenem in ICU †79,779 (29.78)78,397 (30.76)1382 (10.64)<0.0001
ICU duration (days): median (IQR)10 (6–17)11 (6–17)2 (1–5)<0.0001
Comorbidities
Congestive heart failure15,687 (5.86)15,037 (5.90)650 (5.00)<0.0001
Cerebrovascular accident27,633 (10.32)26,331 (10.33)1302 (10.02)0.2621
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease43,935 (16.40)42,181 (16.55)1754 (13.50)<0.0001
Liver disease20,097 (7.50)18,935 (7.43)1162 (8.95)<0.0001
Chronic kidney disease12,706 (4.74)12,110 (4.75)596 (4.59)0.3948
CCI: mean ± SD1.9 ± 2.21.9 ± 2.21.7 ± 2.1<0.0001
085,527 (31.93)80,483 (31.58)5044 (38.83)<0.0001
1–2104,476 (39.00)99,834 (39.17)4642 (35.74)
≥377,868 (29.07)74,565 (29.25)3303 (25.43)
Hospital mortality90,918 (33.94)86,642 (33.99)4276 (32.92)0.0118
1-year mortality157,846 (58.93)151,002 (59.24)6844 (52.69)<0.0001
Clostridium difficile infection ‡435 (0.16)426 (0.17)9 (0.07)0.0069
† Including imipenem and meropenem; ‡ within 90 days after ICU admission. All data are expressed as n (%) unless otherwise specified. Categorical variables, expressed as counts and percentages, were analyzed using a χ2 test. Variables with a normal distribution are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and were tested for differences using Student’s t-test. Variables not normally distribution are expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR) and differences tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. CCI: (Charlson Comorbidity Index).
Table
Table 2. Multivariate analysis for C. difficile infection in intubated ICU patients.
Table 2. Multivariate analysis for C. difficile infection in intubated ICU patients.
VariablesTotalEvents(%)AHR *(95% CI)p
Age (years): mean ± SD
18–6487,675104(0.12%)1.00(Reference)-
65–7461,383100(0.16%)1.20(0.91–1.59)0.2001
≥75118,813231(0.19%)1.43(1.12–1.83)0.0041
Gender
Female102,217172(0.17%)1.00(Reference)-
Male165,654263(0.16%)0.95(0.78–1.16)0.6235
MV Support Duration (days)
None12,9899(0.07%)1.00(Reference)-
7–1497,529126(0.13%)1.63(0.83–3.20)0.1595
15–2152,06867(0.13%)1.52(0.76–3.06)0.2377
22–2835,26473(0.21%)2.34(1.17–4.68)0.0168
29–6070,021160(0.23%)2.39(1.21–4.69)0.0117
Carbapenem Therapy Duration (days)
None188,092233(0.12%)1.00(Reference)-
1–7367811(0.30%)2.02(1.10–3.10)0.0227
8–1410,61615(0.14%)1.19(0.72–2.01)0.5117
≥1565,485176(0.27%)1.88(1.54–2.30)<.0001
Comorbidities
CHF15,68735(0.22%)1.14(0.80–1.63)0.4676
CVA27,63353(0.19%)0.93(0.69–1.25)0.6116
COPD43,93579(0.18%)0.88(0.68–1.14)0.3378
Liver disease20,09734(0.17%)1.05(0.73–1.51)0.7896
CKD12,70633(0.26%)1.38(0.95–2.02)0.0902
CCI
085,52789(0.10%)1.00(Reference)-
1–2104,476192(0.18%)1.62(1.24–2.10)0.0004
≥377,868154(0.20%)1.65(1.22–2.24)0.0012
* Adjusted hazard ratio (AHR); adjusted for age, sex, MV support days, duration of carbapenem therapy, comorbidities, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).
Table
Table 3. Subgroup analysis of the interaction between carbapenem therapy and mechanical ventilation support for C. difficile infection in critically ill ICU patients.
Table 3. Subgroup analysis of the interaction between carbapenem therapy and mechanical ventilation support for C. difficile infection in critically ill ICU patients.
VariablesnEvents(%)AHR *(95% CI)p
Carbapenem
No188,092233(0.12%)1.00(Reference)-
Yes79,779202(0.25%)1.92(1.59–2.32)<0.0001
Mechanical Ventilation
No12,9899(0.07%)1.00(Reference)-
Yes254,882426(0.17%)2.19(1.13–4.24)0.0199
MV Support Duration (days)
None12,9899(0.07%)1.00(Reference)-
7–1497,529126(0.13%)1.76(0.90–3.46)0.1013
15–2152,06867(0.13%)1.73(0.86–3.48)0.1219
22–2835,26473(0.21%)2.72(1.36–5.44)0.0046
29–6070,021160(0.23%)2.85(1.46–5.58)0.0023
MV, Carbapenem
No MV, no carbapenem11,6077(0.06%)1.00(Reference)-
No MV, carbapenem13822(0.14%)1.99(0.41–9.60)0.3898
MV, no carbapenem176,485226(0.13%)1.94(0.91–4.11)0.0857
MV, carbapenem78,397200(0.26%)3.64(1.71–7.75)0.0008
* Adjusted hazard ratio (AHR); adjusted for carbapenem therapy, mechanical ventilation (MV) support, and interactions between the two events.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chiang, S.-R.; Lai, C.-C.; Ho, C.-H.; Chen, C.-M.; Chao, C.-M.; Wang, J.-J.; Cheng, K.-C. Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation Assistance Interacts Synergistically with Carbapenem for Clostridium difficile Infection in Critically Ill Patients. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7080224

AMA Style

Chiang S-R, Lai C-C, Ho C-H, Chen C-M, Chao C-M, Wang J-J, Cheng K-C. Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation Assistance Interacts Synergistically with Carbapenem for Clostridium difficile Infection in Critically Ill Patients. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2018; 7(8):224. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7080224

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chiang, Shyh-Ren, Chih-Cheng Lai, Chung-Han Ho, Chin-Ming Chen, Chien-Ming Chao, Jhi-Joung Wang, and Kuo-Chen Cheng. 2018. "Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation Assistance Interacts Synergistically with Carbapenem for Clostridium difficile Infection in Critically Ill Patients" Journal of Clinical Medicine 7, no. 8: 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7080224

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop