Next Article in Journal
Factors Contributing to Negative Outcomes Associated with Medications and Drug-Related Problems in Kidney Replacement Therapy—A Hospital-Based Prospective Observational Study
Previous Article in Journal
Non-Invasive Assessment of Liver Fibrosis in Hepatitis B Patients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Cardiomyopathy in Celiac Disease: A Systematic Review

1
Internal Medicine Residency Program at Lee Health, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, FL 32301, USA
2
School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
3
Cardiology Fellowship Program, Cook County, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
4
Section of Hospital Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA
5
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
6
Department of Hospital Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Eau Claire, WI 54703, USA
7
Cardiology Fellowship Program, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
8
Elmhurst Hospital, New York, NY 11373, USA
9
Francisian Health, Olympia Fields, IL 60461, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(4), 1045; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041045
Submission received: 23 January 2024 / Revised: 5 February 2024 / Accepted: 8 February 2024 / Published: 12 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cardiomyopathy: A Comprehensive Review)

Abstract

:
(1) Background: Cardiomyopathy in celiac disease or celiac cardiomyopathy (CCM) is a serious and potentially life-threatening disease that can occur in both adults and children. However, data supporting the causal relationship between celiac disease (CD) and cardiomyopathy (CMP) are still inconsistent. The aim of this study was to review and synthesize data from the literature on this topic and potentially reveal a more evidence-based causal relationship. (2) Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to search Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases from database inception until September 2023. A total of 1187 original articles were identified. (3) Results: We identified 28 CCM patients (19 adult and 9 pediatric) with a mean age of 27.4 ± 18.01 years. Adult patients with CCM were predominantly male (84.2%) while pediatric patients were predominantly female (75%). The most common comorbidities associated with CCM were anemia (75%) and pulmonary hemosiderosis (20%). In 35% of patients, CCM occurred before the diagnosis of CD, while in 48% of patients, CCM and CD were diagnosed at the same time. Diagnosis of CD preceded diagnosis of CCM in only 18% of patients. Diagnosis of CCM is often delayed with an average, from the onset of symptoms to diagnosis, of 16 months. All patients were treated with a gluten-free diet in addition to guideline-directed medical therapy. At 11-month follow-up, cardiovascular improvement was seen in 60.7% of patients. Pediatric mortality was 33.3%, while adult mortality was 5.3%. (4) Conclusions: Clinicians should be aware of the possible association between CD and CMP, and we recommend CD work-up in all patients with CMP who have concomitant anemia. While we identified only 28 cases in the literature, many cases might go unreported due to a lack of awareness regarding CCM. A high degree of clinical suspicion and a prompt diagnosis of CCM are essential to minimizing the risks of morbidity and mortality, as the combination of a gluten-free diet and guideline-directed medical therapy can improve clinical outcomes.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Celiac disease (CD), also known as gluten-sensitive enteropathy (GSE), is a chronic, immune-mediated disease that develops in genetically predisposed individuals due to their sensitivity to cereal gluten [1,2,3]. The prevalence of the disease in the United States is about 1%, but there is a significant geographical variability worldwide. The highest incidences are seen in Scandinavia and Turkey with prevalences of up to 3% [3]. Patients with CD frequently exhibit extraintestinal manifestations that are sometimes more pronounced than the commonly described gastrointestinal symptoms of abdominal pain, diarrhea, dietary nutrient deficiency, and malabsorption [1,2,3,4]. Well-documented extraintestinal manifestations include dermatitis herpetiformis, iron deficiency anemia (IDA), celiac ataxia, celiac hepatitis, and neuropsychiatric, hematologic, and thrombotic disorders [1,2,3,4,5,6,7].
Cardiomyopathy (CMP) can be classified into primary and secondary. Primary CMP refers to a group of diseases that affect the heart muscle itself, with abnormalities manifesting both structurally and functionally. It is important to note that these abnormalities are distinct from issues related to valves, coronary arteries, congenital conditions, or hypertension [8,9,10]. However, in secondary CMP, the previously mentioned factors play key pathophysiological roles in the development of heart muscle changes. The leading cause of secondary CMP is ischemia in the setting of coronary artery disease, subsequent blood flow disruption, and a decreased oxygenation of cardiomyocytes [11].
Dilated CMP is a chronic, progressive disease of the heart muscle that presents with unilateral or bilateral ventricle dilation, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and usually progresses to congestive heart failure (CHF) [12]. Primary dilated CMP is idiopathic, often with a genetic/familial predisposition, whereas the secondary form results from a direct injury to the myocardium with commonly described causes such as infection, alcohol use, hypertension, illicit drugs, and medications [12].
Cardiac manifestations of CD are rarely reported, and there is a paucity of evidence on this topic [13]. Among patients with dilated, non-ischemic CMP, there is a notable prevalence of those with CD [14,15,16]. Celiac cardiomyopathy (CCM) is a serious and potentially life-threatening disease, sometimes requiring heart transplantation [17], and can occur in adult and pediatric populations [18]. A potential connection between CD and CMP has been previously identified; however, the data supporting this association are inconsistent [15,19,20,21].
The aim of this systematic review was to review and synthesize data from the literature on this topic to further explore the previously identified potential connection between CD and CMP.

2. Materials and Methods

We performed a systematic literature review of all CCM cases utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and searching the Medline (via PubMed search engine), Embase, and Scopus databases. This study is registered with the ResearchRegistry, and the unique identifying number is 1783. All reported articles were analyzed from database inception until September 1st, 2023. A total of 1187 original articles were identified that mention the following MeSH terms: “celiac OR gluten-sensitive enteropathy” AND “cardiomyopathy OR myocarditis OR cardiac OR heart” NOT “celiac trunk”. We only included cases with biopsy-proven CD and where the diagnosis of CMP was established by identifying new ventricular systolic or diastolic dysfunctions via transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Other findings supportive of diagnosis included an elevation in cardiac enzymes, with or without a new onset of arrhythmia. We excluded cases that did not have biopsy-proven CD (including those with positive serologic testing for CD) and where a CMP diagnosis was not certain, or where there was a plausible alternative diagnosis (ischemic work-up was not performed or incomplete, viral causes were not excluded, etc.). We also excluded cases of myocarditis without abnormalities in the systolic or diastolic heart function. Furthermore, duplicate articles, articles in a language other than English, abstracts without comprehensive case descriptions, and narrative reviews were all excluded.
Two authors (S.M. and P.J.) in blinded fashion independently identified and selected titles, abstracts, and full texts in the database search. Discrepancies in the selected articles were resolved by the senior author (I.D.). Additionally, reference lists of selected articles were searched to identify any additional cases for inclusion in accordance with previously established selection criteria. The flow chart of the detailed article selection and the final cases included in the analysis is illustrated in Figure 1.
For each case, we extracted patients’ demographic data, co-morbid conditions, presenting symptoms, physical exam findings, laboratory and imaging findings (including electrocardiograms [ECG], TTE, and other imaging techniques), treatment options, complications, and outcomes.
Data were analyzed through descriptive statistics and expressed as the mean ± standard deviation for continuous data, or as frequencies and percentages for categorical data. Percentages for categorical data were determined based on the total count of cases that provided specific categorical information. Not-reported values were excluded from calculations.

3. Results

3.1. Demographics and Comorbidities

Our systematic review identified 28 unique cases (19 adult and 9 pediatric patients) from 23 case reports and 2 case series, published from 1986 to 2022 [17,18,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. The overall age range was from 3 to 70 years, with a mean of 27.4 ± 18.0 years. The pediatric mean age was 9.7 ± 4.8 years, and the adult mean age was 35.8 ± 15.2 years. The sex was reported in 27 cases (96.4%; not reported in one pediatric case). The adult patients were predominantly male (84.2%); however, the female sex was predominant among the pediatric population (75%). The reported comorbidities were anemia, lung hemosiderosis, diabetes mellitus type 1, stroke, hypothyroidism, depression, and atrial fibrillation (Table 1).

3.2. Presentation

Clinical presentation was reported in 25 cases (89.3%). Cardiovascular symptoms included dyspnea (n = 16), palpitations (n = 5), chest pain (n = 3), orthopnea (n = 3), paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea (n = 3), and syncope (n = 2). Diarrhea (n = 9) was the most common gastrointestinal symptom, and constitutional symptoms (weakness/malaise/fatigue) were present in five patients. Almost all patients (95.5%) had at least one of the following: edema, crackles, heart murmur, or jugular vein distention (JVD). No patients presented with cardiogenic shock or developed cardiogenic shock during the disease course. Idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis (IPH), also known as Lane Hamilton syndrome, was present in four cases (20%).
In five cases (17.8%), a diagnosis of CD had been established prior to the diagnosis of CMP. In 10 cases (35.7%), the diagnosis of CMP preceded the diagnosis of CD. For 12 patients, the diagnoses of CD and CMP were established simultaneously. The timeline was unclear in one adult case (Figure 2).

3.3. Evaluation

The time from symptom occurrence to final diagnosis was reported in 20 cases (71.4%). On average, it took 16.9 (range 0–84) months to diagnose a patient with CCM.
Laboratory results were often reported inconsistently. Troponin was reported in only five cases (17.9%), with four negative values and one mildly elevated value. The other laboratory values mentioned were hemoglobin (53.6%) and mean corpuscular volume (MCV) (25%) with median values at diagnosis being 7.7 g/dL (range 2.8–12.1) and 68.95 fL (range 49.7–74.0) respectively. Nearly all cases (n = 25, 89.2%) reported an elevation in at least one serologic marker of CD: anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody (IgA or IgG), endomysial antibody (IgA or IgG), anti-gliadin antibody (IgA or IgG), or deamidated gliadin antibody (IgA or IgG). Genetic testing was reported in one pediatric case and was positive for HLADQ B1*02, *03, and DRB1 *03*04 alleles [32]. No other genetic testing for possible underlying genetic CMP was reported in the case reports included in this study.
At the time of diagnosis, all cases (100%) were confirmed to have CMP via TTE, with 89.3% (n = 25) of cases having a quantified LVEF and the remaining three cases just reporting a diminished LVEF [27,42,43]. A total of 84.6% (n = 22) of cases reported dilated chambers on TTE. LVEF ranged from 10 to 50%. A reduced LVEF (EF < 50% or described as diminished) was present in 96.2% of the patients (n = 25). One patient had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with an LVEF of 50%. The overall mean LVEF was 27.3 ± 11.5%. Elevated pulmonary artery pressure was reported in three cases, but none of the patients had confirmatory right catheterization for pulmonary hypertension. Pericardial effusion was reported in only two cases. Only three patients had a reported concurrent CD-associated autoimmune myocarditis diagnosis (two diagnosed via CMR imaging and biopsy, and one for which the method of diagnosis was not reported).
Only 25% (n = 7) of patients at admission had a New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification reported. Three patients were NYHA I, one patient was NYHA II, and three patients were NYHA III.
Sixteen patients (57.1%) had reported ECG abnormalities, including left bundle branch block (LBBB) (n = 10; 62.5%), right bundle branch block (RBBB) (n = 1; 6.3%), nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) (n = 1; 6.3%), and 2:1 AV block (n = 1; 6.3%). Additionally, four patients (25%) had tachyarrhythmias, and two patients (12.5%) had T-wave abnormalities (Table 2).
Additional diagnostic imaging performed included the following: CMR imaging in 4 patients (14.3%), coronary angiography (CA) in 11 patients (39.3%), coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in 2 patients (7.1%), CT of the chest in 3 patients (10.7%), CT of the abdomen in 2 patients (7.1%), and 1 patient underwent an exercise stress test (3.6%). Endomyocardial biopsies were performed on five patients (17.9%).
Ischemic CMP was excluded in 13 adult cases (68.4%) with either anatomical or functional testing for coronary artery disease (CA, CCTA). Four cases with two relatively young adults (18- and 20-year-olds) did not report any ischemic work-up [17,28,33,41]. Also, one case had negative troponin on presentation and did not have an official ischemic CMP work-up, while one case underwent a negative stress test without additional testing for coronary artery disease [30,31].

3.4. Treatment, Complications, and Outcomes

LVEF improvement was reported in 13 (50%) out of the 26 patients (92.9%) who were started on a gluten-free diet (GFD) at the time of diagnosis. Proving causality between this change and a GFD is somewhat challenging partly because 75% (n = 21) of the patients received some form of additional guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) (Table 3 and Table 4). Additionally, only 50% of cases reported consistent GFD compliance. Patients reported improvement during their follow-up appointments, which averaged 11.4 months after GFD initiation. The earliest follow-up occurred at 3 weeks, while the latest was at 30 months. For patients compliant with their GFD, the average time until follow-up was 9.35 months (Table 4).
A total of nine cases (32.1%) reported the involvement of other organs with almost half of those (n = 4, 44.4%) involving the lungs. Of all the cases, nine described serious complications. The most frequent complication seen was ventricular tachycardia (n = 3, 30%) followed by other cardiac (e.g., heart block, atrial flutter) and non-cardiac (e.g., deep vein thrombosis) complications. Three intensive care unit (ICU) admissions were reported, including one pediatric patient [18,22,31].
During the last reported follow-up, 24 patients (85.7%) were alive. The pediatric mortality was 33.3% (three patients), with two dying in the hospital and one suddenly dying 2 years following diagnosis. The adult mortality was 5.3% (one patient) with the patient dying 1 month following admission with CMP diagnosis. The median follow-up time was 12.9 months, ranging from 1 to 60 months for cases that reported follow-up information [18,32,42,44].

4. Discussion

The literature on the association of these two entities is conflicting. Initially, a significant association was found by Curione et al., with a 5.8% prevalence of idiopathic CMP amongst patients with CD compared to 1.8% in the general population (p < 0.001) [15]. This was followed by two observational studies from Italy and Denmark, which also showed a possible association [45,46]. Additionally, De Bem et al. found increased endomysial antibodies in 2.6% of pretransplant patients suffering from idiopathic CMP [19]. It is important to acknowledge that each of these studies involved a relatively small patient sample (ranging from three to nine patients). More recent studies have also shown an association between these two diseases [47,48,49].
The largest population-based cohort study conducted so far included nearly 30,000 CD patients, among which 17 patients had CMP [21]. CD was found to have an associated risk for CMP development by 73%, with the highest risk within the first 5 years following CD diagnosis. The same study showed that a prior diagnosis of CMP was associated with a later diagnosis of CD. To the contrary, other studies have found no substantial associations between CD and CMP [16,20,50,51]. Elfström et al. did not find a statistical significance within adult (HR 1.7; 95% CI 0.4–6.5; p = 0.452) or pediatric (HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.2–3.7; p = 0.794) cohorts [51]. A Swedish retrospective cross-sectional study found LVEF to be better in patients with biopsy-proven CD (LVEF > 49%: 60.1% vs. 50.5%, p = 0.049) [50]. Thus far, there is no systematic literature review of case reports on this topic and our paper is the first to summarize data from case reports and case series regarding CD and CMP.
Aside from CMP, several different cardiac manifestations have also been attributed to the presence of CD [12,51,52,53]. Rhythm and conduction disturbances such as atrial fibrillation and AV block have all been described in the literature as possible complications of CD [52,53,54], some of which were seen in cases reported in this paper [28,41,55]. Moreover, vascular pathology, including accelerated atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and dysregulation of angiogenesis have all been linked to the presence of CD [13,56,57,58].

4.1. Pathophysiology

The association between CD and CMP is complex and not fully understood. Several pathophysiologic mechanisms have been proposed, including the malabsorption of nutrients, a chronic inflammatory state, increased gut permeability, and autoimmune hypothesis (Figure 3) [33,35,40,59,60,61].
CD leads to the malabsorption of nutrients, which causes a range of complications such as anemia, coagulopathy, and thrombosis, all of which may lead to CMP, and CHF [62,63]. The progression of CHF has also been associated with nutritional deficiencies, making malabsorption a possible link between these two disorders [64]. Over half of CD patients have IDA, possibly due to malabsorption in the duodenum, which is the primary location of iron absorption [65,66], and a higher incidence of villous atrophy, which has been associated with a higher degree of IDA [67]. Carnitine deficiency has been known to occur in CD due to malabsorption. Carnitine is important for the oxidation of long-chain fatty acids, and its deficiency is proven to be associated with the development of CMP, likely due to long-term derangements of the cardiomyocyte energy metabolism [35,60,68,69]. Aside from this, the development of CMP may be exacerbated by the loss of selenium, thiamine, vitamins, and other micronutrients. CMP and CHF can lead to congestion and intestinal edema, which can further decrease the absorption of important nutrients [64].
The inflammatory theory asserts that chronic inflammation plays a central role in both CD and CCM [70]. Elevated levels of interleukin-4, interleukin-6, interleukin-10, and tumor necrosis factor-α, as well as other cytokines, were found in patients with CD [71]. Notably, increased levels of interleukin-10 are also found in patients with dilated CMP [72]. Additionally, myocarditis, as a common forerunner of dilated CMP has been linked with CD [59]. Hence, the inflammatory state in CD might explain both myocarditis and the development of CMP [73].
Intestinal permeability is increased in CD [54], which may permit the translocation of various antigens from the intestinal lumen, including toxins and infectious agents, which may damage the myocardium directly or indirectly through immune-mediated mechanisms [39]. Several studies indicate that molecular mimicry resulting in autoimmune injury might be a mechanism of cardiac damage, mirroring the way that the autoimmune response leads to intestinal damage. This mechanism was initially proposed by Chuaqui et al. with the immune disruption of actin cytoskeleton in myocardium [42]. Improvement in cardiac function, as well as in intestinal symptoms, following the introduction of a GFD would support this hypothesis [42,55,59]. Such mimicry can be seen between IgA antibodies produced in response to CD and the myocardium, further supporting an autoimmune nature of cardiac manifestations [74].

4.2. Clinical Presentation

CD has been associated with multiple autoimmune diseases including type 1 diabetes, autoimmune thyroid disease, selective IgA deficiency, rheumatoid arthritis, and connective tissue disorders [16,75,76,77,78,79]. Sometimes the symptoms and signs of these associated diseases are predominant, and awareness of their association with CD might help establish a diagnosis of asymptomatic or silent CD.
A pulmonary extraintestinal manifestation of CD is IPH, also known as Lane–Hamilton syndrome (LHS) [80]. Interestingly, IPH is also believed to be immunologically mediated, and a GFD is the recommended treatment [81]. Although described in the literature, IPH and CCM rarely occur simultaneously [30]. In this review, we found four cases of IPH and CCP occurring concomitantly [18,26,30,34]. Most of these cases presented with respiratory complaints or anemia and without gastrointestinal symptoms pertinent to CD. Since both CCM and IPH are very rare extraintestinal manifestations of CD, it might be that some people (due to still unrecognized genetic predisposition) might be more prone to develop these manifestations. In other words, the propensity in some individuals to develop rare extraintestinal manifestations might be associated with a higher likelihood of developing other rare manifestations. However, due to the limited number of cases and lack of basic science research on this topic, this currently remains only a hypothesis.
The presenting signs and symptoms of CCM usually coincide with those of CHF with the most common being dyspnea [82]. Most patients included in this review presented with signs of volume overload. Shock, being the most severe life-threatening complication, was not reported in the cases we included [82]. In this review, cardiac manifestations of CD were more common than gastrointestinal.

4.3. Diagnosis and Testing

When CD is suspected, serological testing for the presence of specific antibodies (anti-endomysial, anti-transglutaminase, etc.) is initially performed, followed by a small intestinal biopsy. However, if antibodies are absent but the clinical suspicion is strong, an intestinal biopsy can confirm the diagnosis of CD [66,83,84]. Nevertheless, esophagogastroduodenoscopy is not always safe and is not without risk of complications. In the case of acute decompensated CHF and severely reduced LVEF, biopsy is usually deferred until the patient is more clinically stable. In this review, nearly all cases reported an elevation in at least one serologic marker of CD, and all cases had biopsy-proven CD.
A CMP diagnosis is made based on imaging, primarily TTE [85]. Cardiac dysfunction in CD patients can be evaluated with newer techniques including two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2DSTE). This modality calculates regional and global myocardial deformation parameters such as strain and strain rate. Multiple studies have evaluated the usefulness of 2DSTE in the diagnosis of clinical or subclinical cardiac dysfunction in CD patients and have shown its superiority when compared to conventional TTE [86,87,88]. Cenk et al. found that strain and strain rate imaging is superior to conventional TTE for the evaluation of cardiac involvement in CD. The authors compared 20 CD patients and 20 healthy patients. There were no statistical differences in parameters obtained via conventional TTE between these two groups, including LVEF (67.8% and 68.5%). However, the strain values obtained from the LV in three out of eight segments were statistically higher in the control group (p < 0.05) [86]. Deveci et al. identified significant impairment of the LV radial and longitudinal strains in patients with CD compared with a healthy control group, while TTE showed no differences between patients with CD and the control group (including wall thickness, LV systolic, and diastolic parameters). Also, both intervention and control groups had normal LVEF [87]. Furthermore, El Amrousy et al. showed that the LV global longitudinal strain was significantly lower in children affected by CD when compared to healthy individuals [88]. While advanced echocardiography imaging techniques have demonstrated superior diagnostic capabilities for cardiac dysfunction, it is noteworthy that the cases included in our study did not utilize these imaging modalities. Instead, patients were diagnosed via conventional TTE. Additional modalities used in diagnosis in our cases were cardiac catheterization, CMR, and endomysial biopsy, mostly to rule out other causes of CMP.
Endomysial biopsy is the gold standard used to determine and confirm the cause of myocarditis, especially in patients with unexplained fulminant CMP, or unexplained new onset CHF of two weeks to three months duration associated with a dilated LV, new ventricular arrhythmias, AV blocks, or failure to respond to usual care within one to two weeks [89]. Biopsy can help in excluding other causes of CMP such as giant cell, lymphocytic, or sarcoid myocarditis. Once the diagnosis of CMP is established, biopsy or CMR can help determine the etiology, which may have therapeutic implications. In certain instances, patients might undergo serological and genetic testing for specific autoimmune and familial forms [85]. ECG and ambulatory Holter monitoring might be necessary in these patients if there is a concern for arrhythmogenic activity (e.g., in patients presenting with syncope) [85].
IDA in patients with CMP should arouse suspicion for CD [16,19]. De Bem et al. found 12.2% of cases with CMP to have CD and made a recommendation of screening these patients for CD [19]. In this review, 35.7% (n = 10) of patients had a diagnosis of CD made after a diagnosis of CMP was already established. The presence of IDA should prompt clinicians to have CD in differential diagnosis as one of the causes of non-ischemic CMP.
The main differential diagnoses that need to be excluded in patients with CCM are coronary artery disease, ischemic CMP, drug-induced, and CMP associated with infections. Most of the adult cases included in this review excluded ischemic CMP as a cause of LVEF worsening. Two adult cases reported relatively young patients (18 and 20 years old) that did not prompt ischemic work-up [17,28]. However, one of these cases had a CMR that did not show regional wall abnormalities, but rather signs of myocarditis [28]. In three cases, an ischemic workup was not mentioned, and the authors presumed CMP was related to CD-given improvement with a GFD [30,33,41].

4.4. Treatment

Currently, the only treatment proven to be effective in patients with CD is a GFD [90], but there are no specific recommendations regarding the treatment of CCM. Traditionally, CCM patients have been treated with a GFD in addition to adequate GDMT (Table 4).
As such, the assumption that adherence to a GFD leads to improvement in LVEF is hard to prove. There are conflicting data on whether a GFD is beneficial in patients with CCM. Some published data support that a strict GFD might have benefits on cardiac function [40]. Conversely, GFD-compliant patients in clinical remission have endoscopic abnormalities and histologic inflammation that persist for many years [70]. This could lead to an assumption that even with adherence to a GFD, patients may still have a residual risk for cardiac damage, particularly when considering the autoimmune hypothesis and molecular mimicry. Additionally, a GFD might play a more complex role in cardiovascular health regardless of CD, as GFD may lead to an increased consumption of fat and sugar in gluten-free dietary plans, further leading to the rise of long-term cardiovascular risk [91].
In this review, overall improvement was noted in most patients (n = 13; 50%). In total, 26 (92.9%) patients were started on a GFD, of which 22 (78.6%) were simultaneously treated with GDMT. With this therapeutic approach, showing a definitive causality between LVEF improvement and the GFD is somewhat challenging. Moreover, only half of the patients reported compliance with their GFD at follow-up visits. At an 18-month follow-up, Milisavljevic et al. reported a worsening in LVEF from 50% to 15–20% in a GFD non-compliant patient [31]. Interestingly, this patient was on a beta-blocker (BB) and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEi). Similar results without LVEF improvement were reported by Lodha et al. and Curione et al. [36,40]. In one case, after an initial LVEF improvement from 30% to 65%, the accidental ingestion of gluten led to a worsening of LVEF to 25% [41]. It is worth mentioning that four out of five cases that did not report being in GDMT in addition to on a GFD also showed significant improvement in LVEF [28,37,38,39] on follow-up TTE.
While a GFD is an effective treatment of gastrointestinal symptomatology in CD, clear and uniform evidence of reversing CMP through dietary intervention is lacking. Hence, our recommendation would be to follow the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association heart failure guidelines and always treat CCM patients with adequate GDMT in addition to a strict GFD.
In recent years, other pathophysiology-driven strategies for treatments of CD have been developed [92]. The most promising agents are larazotide and latiglutenase, which work by stabilizing the enterocyte tight junctions and preventing mucosal degradation induced by gluten [93,94]. The inhibition of tissue transglutaminase-2 with ZED1227 showed safety and tolerability in a phase 1 clinical trial [95]. Additionally, immune modulation with anti-IL-15 antibody and pan-JAK inhibitor (tofacitinib) has been shown to have symptomatic benefits in CD patients [96,97]. Whether these drugs can be used in patients with CCM has yet to be investigated.

4.5. Complications and Outcomes

Considering the possible severity of CD presentation and duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis, many complications may arise in the course of this disease.
Rhythm abnormalities such as heart block and severe bradycardia requiring pacemaker implantation were reported by Anderson et al. and Milisavljevic et al., respectively [28,31]. Additionally, the case of Milisavljevic et al. was further complicated by an episode of atrial flutter treated with radiofrequency ablation [31]. Such changes in rhythm associated with CD are often described in the literature, with some cases showing significant improvement on a GFD [98].
In addition to the aforementioned cardiovascular complications, also reported were two cases of ventricular tachycardia [40,41], wide QRS treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy [26], and one case that resulted in a heart transplantation [17].
Out of four patients that died, three were pediatric cases. Due to the small sample size and the likelihood that these outcomes may have been random in nature, any correlation is difficult to substantiate amongst the cases presented in this paper.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, patients with anemia and evidence of CMP should be evaluated for CD. Patients with CD may have a variety of cardiovascular complications, and clinicians should be aware of the possible association. With CCM, a high degree of clinical suspicion and prompt diagnosis are essential to minimize the risks of morbidity and mortality. Treatment with a GFD and implementing adequate GDMT are of paramount importance in treating patients with CCM. Regular follow-ups are needed to ensure compliance with dietary and medical therapy and to monitor for improvement in cardiac function. While we summarized all available case reports and case series in the last 35 years, additional rigorous prospective studies are needed to establish the association between CD and cardiac involvement and to elucidate the exact pathophysiology of this disease.

6. Limitations of Study

The limitations of our study are inherent to the nature of this type of literature review and include selection and publication bias. This systematic review included only 28 cases, which is admittedly a small sample. We included only articles published in the English language and in three databases, which put us at risk of missing some high-quality cases that did not meet our pre-selection criteria. In addition, all data were observational and due to small sample size statistics, descriptive.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M., P.J., A.A., M.D., D.J. and I.D.; data collection: S.M., P.J., D.J., A.A. and M.R.; methodology, C.W.N., M.K. and M.N.; formal analysis, M.P. and P.J.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M., P.J., A.A. and D.J.; writing—review and editing, M.R., C.W.N., M.W. and I.D.; visualization, M.K.; supervision, M.D. and I.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are publicly available.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Fasano, A.; Catassi, C. Celiac Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 2419–2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Oxentenko, A.S.; Rubio-Tapia, A. Celiac Disease. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2019, 94, 2556–2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Laurikka, P.; Nurminen, S.; Kivelä, L.; Kurppa, K. Extraintestinal Manifestations of Celiac Disease: Early Detection for Better Long-Term Outcomes. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Durazzo, M.; Ferro, A.; Brascugli, I.; Mattivi, S.; Fagoonee, S.; Pellicano, R. Extra-Intestinal Manifestations of Celiac Disease: What Should We Know in 2022? J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Balaban, D.V.; Popp, A.; Ionita Radu, F.; Jinga, M. Hematologic Manifestations in Celiac Disease—A Practical Review. Medicina 2019, 55, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Balaban, D.V.; Coman, L.I.; Enache, I.C.; Mardan, C.M.; Dima, A.; Jurcuț, C.; Balaban, M.; Costache, R.S.; Ioniță-Radu, F.; Popp, A.; et al. Prevalence of Coagulopathy in Patients with Celiac Disease: A Single-Center Retrospective Case-Control Study. Gastroenterol. Insights 2023, 14, 463–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pantic, N.; Pantic, I.; Jevtic, D.; Mogulla, V.; Oluic, S.; Durdevic, M.; Nordin, T.; Jecmenica, M.; Milovanovic, T.; Gavrancic, T.; et al. Celiac Disease and Thrombotic Events: Systematic Review of Published Cases. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Maisch, B. Classification of cardiomyopathies according to the WHO/ISFC Task Force—More questions than answers? Med. Klin. Munich 1998, 93, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Elliott, P.; Andersson, B.; Arbustini, E.; Bilinska, Z.; Cecchi, F.; Charron, P.; Dubourg, O.; Kühl, U.; Maisch, B.; McKenna, W.J.; et al. Classification of the cardiomyopathies: A position statement from the european society of cardiology working group on myocardial and pericardial diseases. Eur. Heart J. 2008, 29, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Maron, B.J. The 2006 American Heart Association Classification of Cardiomyopathies Is the Gold Standard. Circ. Heart Fail. 2008, 1, 72–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Del Buono, M.G.; Moroni, F.; Montone, R.A.; Azzalini, L.; Sanna, T.; Abbate, A. Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Heart Failure After Acute Myocardial Infarction. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2022, 24, 1505–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dilated Cardiomyopathy—StatPearls—NCBI Bookshelf. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441911/ (accessed on 14 April 2022).
  13. Ciaccio, E.J.; Lewis, S.K.; Biviano, A.B.; Iyer, V.; Garan, H.; Green, P.H. Cardiovascular involvement in celiac disease. World J. Cardiol. 2017, 9, 652–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zahmatkeshan, M.; Fallahpoor, M.; Amoozgar, H. Prevalence of celiac disease in children with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Iran. J. Pediatr. 2014, 24, 587–592. [Google Scholar]
  15. Curione, M.; Barbato, M.; Biase, L.D.; Viola, F.; Russo, L.L.; Cardi, E. Prevalence of coeliac disease in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Lancet 1999, 354, 222–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Not, T.; Faleschini, E.; Tommasini, A.; Repetto, A.; Pasotti, M.; Baldas, V.; Spano, A.; Sblattero, D.; Marzari, R.; Campana, C.; et al. Celiac disease in patients with sporadic and inherited cardiomyopathies and in their relatives. Eur. Heart J. 2003, 24, 1455–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Barrio, J.P.; Cura, G.; Ramallo, G.; Diez, M.; Vigliano, C.A.; Katus, H.A.; Mereles, D. Heart transplantation in rapidly progressive end-stage heart failure associated with celiac disease. BMJ Case Rep. 2011, 2011, bcr1220103624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Poddar, B.; Shava, U.; Srivastava, A.; Kapoor, A. Severe heart failure, dilated cardiomyopathy and pulmonary haemosiderosis in celiac disease: Report of two cases. Paediatr. Int. Child Health 2014, 34, 142–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. De Bem, R.S.T.; Da Ro Sa Utiyama, S.R.; Nisihara, R.M.; Fortunato, J.A.; Tondo, J.A.; Carmes, E.R.; Souza, R.A.E.; Pisani, J.C.; Amarante, H.M.B.D.S. Celiac disease prevalence in Brazilian dilated cardiomyopathy patients. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2006, 51, 1016–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vizzardi, E.; Lanzarotto, F.; Carabellese, N.; Mora, A.; Bertolazzi, S.; Benini, F.; Nodari, S.; Dei Cas, L.; Lanzini, A. Lack of association of coeliac disease with idiopathic and ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathies. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig. 2008, 68, 692–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Emilsson, L.; Andersson, B.; Elfström, P.; Green, P.H.R.; Ludvigsson, J.F. Risk of Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy in 29,000 Patients with Celiac Disease. J. Am. Heart Assoc. Cardiovasc. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2012, 1, e001594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bohra, S.; Shah, A. Celiac Disease Presenting as Cardiomyopathy—A Rare Extra Intestinal Manifestation. Int. J. Celiac Dis. 2020, 8, 56–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mehra, S.; Gupta, A.; Bhalla, K.; Nanda, S. Recurrent heart failure in a child with underlying dilated cardiomyopathy associated with celiac disease: An unusual presentation. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2022, 11, 5689–5691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Elnour, S.; Hashim, M.; Ibrahim, H. Dilated cardiomyopathy associated with celiac disease: A case report. Clin. Case Rep. 2021, 9, e04990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Meyer, S.; Nourkami-Tutdibi, N.; Poryo, M.; Casper, M.; Geipel, M.; Zemlin, M. Pericardial effusion, cardiomegaly, oedema, and IgA deficiency in a child: Coeliac disease. Lancet 2021, 397, 1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Myrmel, G.M.S.; Lunde, T.; Dizdar, V.; Larsen, T.H.; Saeed, S. Myocarditis in a young patient with celiac disease; a case report and literature review. Open Cardiovasc. Med. J. 2021, 15, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Patel, P.; Smith, F.; Kilcullen, N.; Artis, N. Dilated cardiomyopathy as the first presentation of coeliac disease: Association or causation? Clin. Med. J. R. Coll. Physicians Lond. 2018, 18, 177–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Anderson, B.; Rizvi, S.; Lin, G.; Nehra, V. A case of heart failure and diarrhoea. Gut 2017, 66, 1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. McGrath, S.; Thomas, A.; Gorard, D.A. Cardiomyopathy responsive to gluten withdrawal in a patient with coeliac disease. BMJ Case Rep. 2016, 2016, bcr2015213301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khilnani, G.C.; Jain, N.; Tiwari, P.; Hadda, V.; Singh, L. A young man with hemoptysis: Rare association of idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis, celiac disease and dilated cardiomyopathy. Lung India 2015, 32, 70–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Milisavljević, N.; Cvetković, M.; Nikolić, G.; Filipović, B.; Milinić, N. Dilated cardiomyopathy associated with celiac disease: Case report and literature review. Srp. Arh. Celok. Lek. 2012, 140, 641–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Boskovic, A.; Kitic, I.; Prokic, D.; Stankovic, I. Cardiomyopathy associated with celiac disease in childhood. Case Rep. Gastrointest. Med. 2012, 2012, 170760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Romagnoli, E.; Boldrini, E.; Pietrangelo, A. Association between celiac disease and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: A case report. Intern. Emerg. Med. 2011, 6, 125–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Narula, N.; Rawal, P.; Manoj Kumar, R.; Thapa, B.R. Association of celiac disease with cardiomyopathy and pulmonary hemosiderosis. J. Trop. Pediatr. 2010, 56, 201–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Uslu, N.; Demir, H.; Karagöz, T.; Saltik-Temizel, I.N. Dilated cardiomyopathy in celiac disease: Role of carnitine deficiency. Acta Gastro-Enterol. 2010, 73, 530–531. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lodha, A.; Haran, M.; Hollander, G.; Frankel, R.; Shani, J. Celiac disease associated with dilated cardiomyopathy. South. Med. J. 2009, 102, 1052–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Glover, B.M.; Treanor, N.J.; McEneaney, D.J. A case of dilated cardiomyopathy associated with coeliac disease. Arch. Med. Sci. 2007, 3, 272–273. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gelfond, D.; Fasano, A. Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Type 1 Diabetes in a Patient with Celiac Disease. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2006, 43, E43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Goel, N.K.; McBane, R.D.; Kamath, P.S. Cardiomyopathy associated with celiac disease. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2005, 80, 674–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Curione, M.; Barbato, M.; Viola, F.; Francia, P.; De Biase, L.; Cucchiara, S. Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy associated with coeliac disease: The effect of a gluten-free diet on cardiac performance. Dig. Liver Dis. 2002, 34, 866–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Makhdoom, Z.A.; Randall, N.W. Dilated cardiomyopathy due to anticardiolipin syndrome in association with celiac sprue. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2000, 31, 91–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chuaqui, B.; Garrido, J.; Casanegra, P. Actin-deficient cardiomyopathy coexisting with celiac disease: A chance association? Pathol. Res. Pract. 1986, 181, 604–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Doǧan, M.; Peker, E.; Cagan, E.; Akbayram, S.; Acikgoz, M.; Caksen, H.; Uner, A.; Cesur, Y. Stroke and dilated cardiomyopathy associated with celiac disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2010, 16, 2302–2304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Isįkay, S.; Yilmaz, K.; Kilinç, M. Celiac disease with pulmonary haemosiderosis and cardiomyopathy. BMJ Case Rep. 2012, 2012, bcr2012007262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Prati, D.; Bardella, M.T.; Peracchi, M.; Porretti, L.; Scalamogna, M.; Conte, D. Antiendomysial antibodies in patients with end-stage heart failure. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2002, 97, 218–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Fonager, K.; Sørensen, H.T.; Nørgård, B.; Thulstrup, A.M. Cardiomyopathy in Danish patients with coeliac disease. Lancet 1999, 354, 1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Curione, M.; Barbato, M.; Cugini, P.; Amato, S.; Da Ros, S.; Di Bona, S. Association of cardiomyopathy and celiac disease: An almost diffuse but still less know entity. A review. Arch. Med. Sci. 2008, 4, 103–107. [Google Scholar]
  48. Polat, T.B.; Urganci, N.; Yalcin, Y.; Zeybek, C.; Akdeniz, C.; Erdem, A.; Imanov, E.; Celebi, A. Cardiac functions in children with coeliac disease during follow-up: Insights from tissue Doppler imaging. Dig. Liver Dis. Off. J. Ital. Soc. Gastroenterol. Ital. Assoc. Study Liver 2008, 40, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Menezes, T.M.G.A.L.D.; Motta, M.E.F.A. Celiac disease prevalence in children and adolescents with myocarditis and dilated cardiomiopathy. J. Pediatr. 2012, 88, 439–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Emilsson, L.; Carlsson, R.; Holmqvist, M.; James, S.; Ludvigsson, J.F. The characterisation and risk factors of ischaemic heart disease in patients with coeliac disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2013, 37, 905–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Elfström, P.; Hamsten, A.; Montgomery, S.M.; Ekbom, A.; Ludvigsson, J.F. Cardiomyopathy, pericarditis and myocarditis in a population-based cohort of inpatients with coeliac disease. J. Intern. Med. 2007, 262, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Mannarino, S.; Santacesaria, S.; Raso, I.; Fini, G.; Pozzi, E.; Cocuccio, C.; Calcaterra, V.; Zuccotti, G. Atrioventricular Block in Celiac Disease: An Unusual Clinical Presentation in a Child. A Case-Based Review. Children 2022, 9, 1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Saleh, F.; Greene, E.A.; Mathison, D. Evaluation and management of atrioventricular block in children. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2014, 26, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Caio, G.; Volta, U.; Sapone, A.; Leffler, D.A.; De Giorgio, R.; Catassi, C.; Fasano, A. Celiac disease: A comprehensive current review. BMC Med. 2019, 17, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Curione, M. Dilated cardiomyopathy and celiac disease. Ital. Heart J. Off. J. Ital. Fed. Cardiol. 2002, 3, 384–385. [Google Scholar]
  56. Kalliokoski, S.; Sulic, A.-M.; Korponay-Szabó, I.R.; Szondy, Z.; Frias, R.; Perez, M.A.; Martucciello, S.; Roivainen, A.; Pelliniemi, L.J.; Esposito, C.; et al. Celiac Disease–Specific TG2-Targeted Autoantibodies Inhibit Angiogenesis Ex Vivo and In Vivo in Mice by Interfering with Endothelial Cell Dynamics. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e65887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Myrsky, E.; Caja, S.; Simon-Vecsei, Z.; Korponay-Szabo, I.R.; Nadalutti, C.; Collighan, R.; Mongeot, A.; Griffin, M.; Mäki, M.; Kaukinen, K.; et al. Celiac disease IgA modulates vascular permeability in vitro through the activity of transglutaminase 2 and RhoA. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2009, 66, 3375–3385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Boucelma, M.; Saadi, M.; Boukrara, H.; Bensalah, D.; Hakem, D.; Berrah, A. Association of celiac disease and cerebral venous thrombosis: Report of two cases. J. Mal. Vasc. 2013, 38, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Frustaci, A.; Cuoco, L.; Chimenti, C.; Pieroni, M.; Fioravanti, G.; Gentiloni, N.; Maseri, A.; Gasbarrini, G. Celiac disease associated with autoimmune myocarditis. Circulation 2002, 105, 2611–2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Curione, M.; Danese, C.; Viola, F.; Di Bona, S.; Anastasia, A.; Cugini, P.; Barbato, M. Carnitine deficiency in patients with coeliac disease and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2005, 15, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. van Elburg, R.M.; Uil, J.J.; Mulder, C.J.; Heymans, H.S. Intestinal permeability in patients with coeliac disease and relatives of patients with coeliac disease. Gut 1993, 34, 354–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Posner, E.B.; Haseeb, M. Celiac Disease; StatPearls: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  63. Mehta, P.A.; Dubrey, S.W. High output heart failure. QJM Int. J. Med. 2009, 102, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Witte, K.K.A.; Clark, A.L.; Cleland, J.G.F. Chronic heart failure and micronutrients. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2001, 37, 1765–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Parzanese, I.; Qehajaj, D.; Patrinicola, F.; Aralica, M.; Chiriva-Internati, M.; Stifter, S.; Elli, L.; Grizzi, F. Celiac disease: From pathophysiology to treatment. World J. Gastrointest. Pathophysiol. 2017, 8, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Singh, P.; Arora, A.; Strand, T.A.; Leffler, D.A.; Catassi, C.; Green, P.H.; Kelly, C.P.; Ahuja, V.; Makharia, G.K. Global Prevalence of Celiac Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Off. Clin. Pract. J. Am. Gastroenterol. Assoc. 2018, 16, 823–836.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bhadada, S.K.; Rastogi, A.; Agarwal, A.; Kochhar, R.; Kochhar, R.; Bhansali, A. Comparative study of clinical features of patients with celiac disease & those with concurrent celiac disease & type 1 diabetes mellitus. Indian J. Med. Res. 2017, 145, 334–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Fu, L.; Huang, M.; Chen, S. Primary Carnitine Deficiency and Cardiomyopathy. Korean Circ. J. 2013, 43, 785–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Yüce, A.; Demir, H.; Temizel, I.N.S.; Koçak, N. Serum carnitine and selenium levels in children with celiac disease. Indian J. Gastroenterol. Off. J. Indian Soc. Gastroenterol. 2004, 23, 87–88. [Google Scholar]
  70. Lee, S.K.; Lo, W.; Memeo, L.; Rotterdam, H.; Green, P.H.R. Duodenal histology in patients with celiac disease after treatment with a gluten-free diet. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2003, 57, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Manavalan, J.S.; Hernandez, L.; Shah, J.G.; Konikkara, J.; Naiyer, A.J.; Lee, A.R.; Ciaccio, E.; Minaya, M.T.; Green, P.H.R.; Bhagat, G. Serum cytokine elevations in celiac disease: Association with disease presentation. Hum. Immunol. 2010, 71, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Marriott, J.B.; Goldman, J.H.; Keeling, P.J.; Baig, M.K.; Dalgleish, A.G.; McKenna, W.J. Abnormal cytokine profiles in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and their asymptomatic relatives. Heart 1996, 75, 287–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mason, J.W. Myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy: An inflammatory link. Cardiovasc. Res. 2003, 60, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sategna-Guidetti, C.; Franco, E.; Martini, S.; Bobbio, M. Binding by serum IgA antibodies from patients with coeliac disease to monkey heart tissue. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2004, 39, 540–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Vives-Pi, M.; Takasawa, S.; Pujol-Autonell, I.; Planas, R.; Cabre, E.; Ojanguren, I.; Montraveta, M.; Santos, A.L.; Ruiz-Ortiz, E. Biomarkers for diagnosis and monitoring of celiac disease. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2013, 47, 308–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Nurkic, J.; Numanovic, F.; Arnautalic, L.; Tihic, N.; Halilovic, D.; Jahic, M. Diagnostic Significance of Reduced IgA in Children. Med. Arch. 2015, 69, 236–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Counsell, C.E.; Taha, A.; Ruddell, W.S. Coeliac disease and autoimmune thyroid disease. Gut 1994, 35, 844–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Komatireddy, G.R.; Marshall, J.B.; Aqel, R.; Spollen, L.E.; Sharp, G.C. Association of systemic lupus erythematosus and gluten enteropathy. South. Med. J. 1995, 88, 673–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Farrell, R.J.; Kelly, C.P. Celiac Sprue. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 346, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Saha, B.K. Idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis: A state of the art review. Respir. Med. 2021, 176, 106234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Ploier, R.; Emhofer, J.; Dorninger, L.; Kranzl, G.; Feichtinger, J.; Müller, K.M.; Brandtzaeg, P. Immunological aspects of a child with idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis and celiac disease. Klin. Padiatr. 1998, 210, 409–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Merlo, M.; Stolfo, D.; Caiffa, T.; Pivetta, A.; Sinagra, G. Clinical Presentation, Spectrum of Disease, and Natural History. In Dilated Cardiomyopathy; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lebwohl, B.; Rubio-Tapia, A. Epidemiology, Presentation, and Diagnosis of Celiac Disease. Gastroenterology 2021, 160, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ferreira, M.; Davies, S.L.; Butler, M.; Scott, D.; Clark, M.; Kumar, P. Endomysial antibody: Is it the best screening test for coeliac disease? Gut 1992, 33, 1633–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Schultheiss, H.-P.; Fairweather, D.; Caforio, A.L.P.; Escher, F.; Hershberger, R.E.; Lipshultz, S.E.; Liu, P.P.; Matsumori, A.; Mazzanti, A.; McMurray, J.; et al. Dilated cardiomyopathy. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primer 2019, 5, 400–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Cenk, S.; Aylin, D.B.; Fatma Ebru, A.; Nihal, A.B.; Sevil, Ö.S.; Serdal, B.; Emine, B.; Hüseyin, A.; Telat, K.; Tahir, D.; et al. Assessment of left ventricular function by strain-strain rate echocardiography in patients with celiac disease. Turk. J. Med. Sci. 2014, 44, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Deveci, M.; Uncuoğlu Aydoğan, A.; Altun, G.; Kayabey, Ö.; Tuğral, O.; Babaoğlu, K. Left ventricular mechanics are affected in children with celiac disease: A study based on two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Echocardiography 2017, 34, 1339–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. El Amrousy, D.; Elshehaby, W.; Elsharaby, R.; Badr, S.; Hamza, M.; Elbarky, A. Myocardial function using two dimension speckle-tracking echocardiography in children with celiac disease. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2023, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Cooper, L.T.; Baughman, K.L.; Feldman, A.M.; Frustaci, A.; Jessup, M.; Kuhl, U.; Levine, G.N.; Narula, J.; Starling, R.C.; Towbin, J.; et al. The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology. Endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America and the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2007, 50, 1914–1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Haines, M.L.; Anderson, R.P.; Gibson, P.R. Systematic review: The evidence base for long-term management of coeliac disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008, 28, 1042–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lebwohl, B.; Cao, Y.; Zong, G.; Hu, F.B.; Green, P.H.R.; Neugut, A.I.; Rimm, E.B.; Sampson, L.; Dougherty, L.W.; Giovannucci, E.; et al. Long term gluten consumption in adults without celiac disease and risk of coronary heart disease: Prospective cohort study. BMJ 2017, 357, j1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Machado, M.V. New Developments in Celiac Disease Treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Gass, J.; Bethune, M.T.; Siegel, M.; Spencer, A.; Khosla, C. Combination enzyme therapy for gastric digestion of dietary gluten in patients with celiac sprue. Gastroenterology 2007, 133, 472–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Leffler, D.A.; Kelly, C.P.; Abdallah, H.Z.; Colatrella, A.M.; Harris, L.A.; Leon, F.; Arterburn, L.A.; Paterson, B.M.; Lan, Z.H.; Murray, J.A. A Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Larazotide Acetate to Prevent the Activation of Celiac Disease During Gluten Challenge. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 107, 1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Büchold, C.; Hils, M.; Gerlach, U.; Weber, J.; Pelzer, C.; Heil, A.; Aeschlimann, D.; Pasternack, R. Features of ZED1227: The First-In-Class Tissue Transglutaminase Inhibitor Undergoing Clinical Evaluation for the Treatment of Celiac Disease. Cells 2022, 11, 1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Lähdeaho, M.-L.; Scheinin, M.; Vuotikka, P.; Taavela, J.; Popp, A.; Laukkarinen, J.; Koffert, J.; Koivurova, O.-P.; Pesu, M.; Kivelä, L.; et al. Safety and efficacy of AMG 714 in adults with coeliac disease exposed to gluten challenge: A phase 2a, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 4, 948–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Wauters, L.; Vanuytsel, T.; Hiele, M. Celiac Disease Remission with Tofacitinib: A Case Report. Ann. Intern. Med. 2020, 173, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Maadarani, O.; Bigdelu, L.; Bitar, Z.; Alhabibi, M.; Kabbara, H. Spontaneous Recovery of Isolated Advanced Heart Block in Patient with Celiac Disease by Starting a Strict Gluten Free Diet: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Eur. J. Case Rep. Intern. Med. 2023, 10, 004012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow chart.
Jcm 13 01045 g001
Figure 2. Diagnostic timeline. CD—Celiac Disease; CMP—Cardiomyopathy.
Figure 2. Diagnostic timeline. CD—Celiac Disease; CMP—Cardiomyopathy.
Jcm 13 01045 g002
Figure 3. Celiac disease and its relationship with the heart.
Figure 3. Celiac disease and its relationship with the heart.
Jcm 13 01045 g003
Table 1. Patients’ demographics, comorbidities, and clinical presentations.
Table 1. Patients’ demographics, comorbidities, and clinical presentations.
Demographic CharacteristicsnAge Range (Years)Mean Age ± SD (Years)M:F Ratio
Adult19 (67.9%)18–7035.8 ± 15.516:3
Pediatric9 (31.1%)3–179.7 ± 4.72:6 (1 NR)
Total28 (100%)3–7027.4 ± 18.018:9 (1 NR)
Comorbidities
Reported20 (71.4%)
Anemia15 (75%)
Idiopathic lung hemosiderosis4 (20%)
Atrial fibrillation, diabetes type 1, stroke, hypothyroidism, depressionEach 1 (5%)
Not reported8 (28.6%)
Clinical Presentation
Dyspnea16 (64%)
Diarrhea9 (36%)
Palpitations5 (20%)
Weakness/malaise, fatigue5 (20%)
Chest pain3 (12%)
Orthopnea3 (12%)
PND3 (12%)
Syncope2 (8%)
Not reported3 (10.7%)
Legend: M—Male; F—Female; SD—Standard Deviation; NR—Not Reported; VTE—Venous Thromboembolism; PND—Paroxysmal Nocturnal Dyspnea.
Table 2. Echocardiography, New York Heart Association classification, and electrocardiography findings.
Table 2. Echocardiography, New York Heart Association classification, and electrocardiography findings.
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
at Diagnosis
nEF Range (%)Mean EF ± SD (%)
Total reported25 (89.3%)10–5027.3 ± 11.5
Adult1712–5027.6 ± 11.3
Pediatric810–4527.6 ± 12.2
Not reported3 (10.7%)--
New York Heart Association Classification
NYHA I3
NYHA II1
NYHA III3
NYHA IV0
Not reported21 (75%)
Electrocardiography
Conduction abnormalities13 (57.1%)
LBBB10 (62.5%)
RBBB1 (6.3%)
IVCD1 (6.3%)
AV block1 (6.3%)
Tachyarrhythmias4 (25%)
T-wave abnormalities2 (12.5%)
Not reported or no abnormalities12 (42.8%)
Legend: EF—Ejection Fraction; SD—Standard Deviation; NYHA—New York Heart Association; LBBB—Left Bundle Branch Block; RBBB—Right Bundle Branch Block; IVCD—Intraventricular Conduction Delay; AV—atrioventricular.
Table 3. Published cases of celiac cardiomyopathy.
Table 3. Published cases of celiac cardiomyopathy.
Reference/YearSex/AgeTimeline of DiagnosisLVEF at
Diagnosis
GFDGDMTFollow-Up LVEF
Mehra, 2022 [23]M, 10CMP25–30%YesIvabradineNR
Elnour, 2021 [24]F, 33Same time15–20%NRBB, ARB, MRA, IvabradineNR
Meyer, 2021 [25]F, 4Same time20%YesNRNR
Myrmel, 2021 [26]M, 21CMP25%YesBB, ARNi35%
Bohra, 2020 [22]F, 35Same time20%Yes“Inotrops”55%
Patel, 2018 [27]M, 19CMP“Severe systolic dysfunction”YesYes, but not specifiedNR
Anderson, 2016 [28]M, 20CD21%YesNR45% (1 y)
McGrath, 2016 [29]M, 57CMP15%YesBB, ACEi, MRA63% (18 m)
70% (2 y)
Khilnani GC, 2015 [30]M, 19Same time25%YesBB35% (2 y)
Poddar, 2014 [18]M, 18CMP12%YesBB, ACEi, MRA, Digoxin25%
Poddar, 2014 [18]F, 13CD10%Yes, non-compliantBB, ACEi, MRA, DigoxinNR
Milisavljevic, 2012 [31]M, 27Same time50%Yes, non-compliantBB, ACEi20–25% (12 m)
15–20% (18 m)
Işikay, 2012 [44]F, 13Same time32%YesNR29%
Boskovic, 2012 [32]F, 3Same time39-45%NRNRNR
Barrio, 2011 [17]M, 24Same time24%YesMRA, DigoxinNR
Romagnoli, 2011 [33]M, 66Same time25%YesACEi, DigoxinNR
Dogan, 2010 [43]F, 8Same time“Dilated Cardiomyopathy”YesNRNR
Narula, 2010 [34]M, 13Same time26%YesACEi, DigoxinNR
Uslu, 2010 [35]F, 6CD46%YesACEi, Digoxin“WNL”
Lodha, 2009 [36]M, 48CD40–45% <25% *Yes, non-compliantBB, ACEi“No improvement”
Glover, 2007 [37]M, 36Same time15%YesNR25%
Gelfond, 2006 [38]NR, 17CD15–20%YesNR36%
Goel, 2005 [39]M, 70CMP45%YesNR65%
Curione, 2002 [40]M, 40CMP38%YesACEi, Digoxin42%
Curione, 2002 [40]M, 32CMP25%YesACEi, Digoxin30%
Curione, 2002 [40]M, 26CMP36%Yes, non-compliantACEi, Digoxin, BB added at follow-up30%
Makhdoom, 2000 [41]F, 49CMP30%YesACEi65%, 25% **
Chuaqui, 1986 [42]M, 34UnclearDiminishedYesNRNR
* Two years after, on carvedilol, enalapril, and furosemide, but not on a GFD. ** After accidental gluten challenge. Legend: BB—Beta Blocker; ACEi—Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibitors; ARB—Angiotensin Receptor Blocker, MRA—Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist; WNL—Within Normal Limits; NR—Not Reported.
Table 4. Therapeutic approach.
Table 4. Therapeutic approach.
Therapeutic Approachn (%)
Gluten-free diet26 (92.9%)
Not reported2 (7.1%)
GDMT20 (71.4%)
ACEi/ARB/ARNi15 (75%)
Loop/thiazide diuretics14 (70%)
Digoxin9 (45%)
Beta-blocker9 (45%)
MRA5 (25%)
Other (dobutamine, ivabradine)4 (20%)
GDMT started, but not specified1 (3.6%)
SGLT-2i *-
Not reported7 (25%)
Legend: GDMT—Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy; ACEi—Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibitors; ARB—Angiotensin Receptor Blocker; ARNi—Angiotensin Receptor/Neprilysin Inhibitor; MRA—Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist; SGLT-2i—Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors; * FDA approved in 2020 for Heart Failure Patients.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Milutinovic, S.; Jancic, P.; Adam, A.; Radovanovic, M.; Nordstrom, C.W.; Ward, M.; Petrovic, M.; Jevtic, D.; Delibasic, M.; Kotseva, M.; et al. Cardiomyopathy in Celiac Disease: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041045

AMA Style

Milutinovic S, Jancic P, Adam A, Radovanovic M, Nordstrom CW, Ward M, Petrovic M, Jevtic D, Delibasic M, Kotseva M, et al. Cardiomyopathy in Celiac Disease: A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(4):1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041045

Chicago/Turabian Style

Milutinovic, Stefan, Predrag Jancic, Adam Adam, Milan Radovanovic, Charles W. Nordstrom, Marshall Ward, Marija Petrovic, Dorde Jevtic, Maja Delibasic, Magdalena Kotseva, and et al. 2024. "Cardiomyopathy in Celiac Disease: A Systematic Review" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 4: 1045. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13041045

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop