Next Article in Journal
Management and Treatment for Dysphagia in Neurodegenerative Disorders
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Different Kinds of Physical Activity on Vascular Function
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Gastric Outlet Obstruction from Stomach-Containing Groin Hernias: Case Report and a Systematic Review

1
Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI 53792, USA
2
Department of Surgery, VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, TX 75216, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(1), 155; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010155
Submission received: 19 November 2023 / Revised: 8 December 2023 / Accepted: 12 December 2023 / Published: 27 December 2023

Abstract

:
Most abdominopelvic structures can find their way to a groin hernia. However, location, and relative fixation are important for migration. Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) from a stomach-containing groin hernia (SCOGH) is exceedingly rare. In the current report, we present a 77-year-old man who presented with GOO from SCOGH to our facility. We performed a review of the literature following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) of patients presenting with SCOGH since it was first reported in 1802. Ninety-one cases of SCOGH were identified (85 inguinal and six femoral) over the last two centuries (1802–2023). GOO from SCOGH occurred in 48% of patients in one review and 18% in our systematic analysis. Initial presentation ranged from a completely asymptomatic patient to peritonitis. Management varied from entirely conservative treatment to elective hernia repair to emergent laparotomy. Only one case of laparoscopic management was documented. Twenty-one deaths from SCOGH were reported, with most occurring in early manuscripts (1802–1896 [n = 9] and 1910–1997 [n = 10]). In the recent medical era, outcomes for patients with this rare clinical presentation are satisfactory and treatment ranging from conservative, non-operative management to surgical repair should be tailored towards patients’ clinical presentation.

1. Introduction

With more than 20 million groin hernia repairs performed every year worldwide, this intervention represents one of the most common operations performed by general surgeons globally [1,2]. It is not uncommon to find abdominopelvic organs within the groin hernia sac. Proximity, chronicity, and gravity make some organs more likely to be found within the femoral or inguinal hernia sac compared to others [3]. A chronic indirect inguinal hernia might lead to adherence of the posterior wall of the hernia sac to an intraabdominal viscus, making that wall indistinguishable from the hernia sac [4]. This type of hernia is called a sliding hernia [5]. Most commonly, the omentum, small bowel, and sigmoid colon are found on the left. On the right, ileocecal contents, or the bladder are often present in sliding hernias [5,6].
Less commonly, a Meckel’s diverticulum (a hernia of Littre) [7], the inflamed appendix (an Amyand hernia) [8], or ovaries with fallopian tubes [9] can be found within the hernia sac. Other eponyms in groin hernias include a two loop incarceration of the small bowel creating a “W” configuration, termed a Maydl’s hernia [10], and an inflamed appendix within the femoral canal, called a de Garengeot hernia [11].
Exceedingly rare contents of the hernia sac include the ureter [12], transverse colon [13], the pancreas [14], and the gallbladder [15]. The spleen [16] and the uterus [17] have also been documented in inguinal hernias in newborns with congenital disorders. The stomach is also uncommonly found in groin hernias.
The stomach is a fixed structure in the upper abdomen. The gastrophrenic, gastrosplenic, hepatogastric, and hepatoduodenal ligaments provide fixation to the stomach superiorly [18]. This arrangement combined with distance, makes the stomach an unusual visitor to the groin. The groin finds a visiting stomach in the following fashion. First, the inferior fixation of the stomach to the greater omentum and the gastrocolic ligament is more tenuous compared to the superior fixation. Initial migration of the omentum to the groin hernia sac with continuous traction and chronicity may eventually lead the stomach to travel within the groin hernia sac [19]. This downward movement of the stomach is termed gastroptosis [20].
Given the relative fixation and lack of proximity of the stomach to the groin, it is extremely rare to find it within the groin hernial contents. Thus, stomach-containing groin hernias (SCOGH) have uncommonly been reported in the literature with less than one hundred cases since it was initially documented in 1802 [21]. The clinical presentation of patients with SCOGH is highly variable but might include gastric outlet obstruction (GOO).
Given the earlier presentation of groin hernias in high-income countries (HICs) compared to low- to middle- income countries (LMICs) as well as the use of multiple diagnostic modalities such as computer tomography in HICs compared to LMICs, it would be less likely to find GOO from SCOGH in HICs [22]. The present report outlines a patient who presented to our institution with a long-standing groin hernia and GOO. The differential diagnosis included a small bowel obstruction from an incarcerated groin hernia, GOO from pectic ulcer disease or other causes of GOO such as a hiatal hernia.
In this report, we reviewed the literature of patients with SCOGH and present a case recently encountered in our practice. Pathophysiology, a brief history, and outcomes related to this rare entity are discussed.

2. Case Presentation

We review a case report of a patient who presented with a SCOGH at our institution. The medical records were reviewed for this patient in the computer patient record system. This work has been reported in line with the SCARE [23].

Case Report

A 77-year-old man with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; on 4 liters of oxygen), hypertension, and class III chronic kidney disease presented to the Emergency Department (ED) at our institution in February of 2023 with an incarcerated left inguinal hernia. He had a one-day history of abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. He reported presence of the hernia for over 10 years. His last bowel movement had been the night prior to presentation to the ED. On physical examination, he was tachycardic to 100 beats per minute and normotensive with a blood pressure of 110/70 mmHg. His abdomen was soft and mildly tender to deep palpation. There was no evidence of peritonitis. He had a left inguinal bulge that was tender to palpation and irreducible. He had no leukocytosis, and his serum lactic acid level was within normal limits. A surgery consult was placed by the ED with a differential diagnosis of a small bowel obstruction from an incarcerated groin hernia. A large bowel obstruction from an incarcerated groin hernia was also possible. He did not have a history of abdominal operations such that a small bowel obstruction from adhesion disease was less likely. Given the absence of peritonitis, a perforated viscous was also less likely.
Due to the patient’s presentation and symptomatology, a nasogastric tube (NGT) was placed in the emergency department for decompression. A subsequent Kidney-Ureter-Bladder X-ray (KUB) demonstrated the tip of the NGT within the left groin. Computed tomography confirmed GOO from an incarcerated stomach within the left groin hernia. There was no radiographic evidence of bowel ischemia or compromise (Figure 1).
Intravenous fluid (IVF) administration and NGT decompression were immediately started. His tachycardia promptly resolved after initiating IVF. Serial abdominal examinations were performed and after a few hours of NGT decompression his left inguinal hernia was reduced. Because he was not interested in surgical intervention, he was started on oral feeds a day later and once he was tolerating his diet well, he was discharged home from the hospital. He was doing well at a six-week follow up visit in the clinic and still not interested in elective surgical repair of his hernia.

3. Review of the Literature

Given the usual presentation of GOO from SCOGH, a systematic review of the literature was undertaken following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines [23]. The primary outcome of this review was to identify the current incidence as reported in the literature of GOO from SCOGH. The secondary outcome was to determine clinical presentation of these patients, diagnostic modalities, and management as well as outcomes as they have occurred in history since this entity was originally described. This information was important in order to offer alternatives to the patient presented in this report.
SH, JF, and MA reviewed all the papers and selected all manuscripts required for inclusion. The initial literature review was performed on 21 March 2023. Various combinations of keywords including “hernia”, “inguinal hernia”, “sliding hernia”, “femoral hernia”, “groin”, and “stomach” were used for our searches. Gastric outlet obstruction from other causes was excluded from our review. No time restriction (beyond that of the existing databases) or language restriction was imposed. Databases including PubMed, MEDLINE (via PubMed), and Embase were initially queried. Subsequently, Cochrane Library, Google, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate were utilized to search and acquire reports that were new and/or unavailable from the previous databases. Further manuscripts were identified by close examination of the references of the index papers and main reviews on this subject [24,25,26]. These manuscripts were included in our review if they were appropriate references and did not duplicate our original findings of patients with SCOGH reviewed elsewhere. JF, MA, and SH reviewed all the abstracts from papers that contained inclusion criteria. JF, MA, and SH reviewed all articles that met including criteria.
The PRISMA flow chart depicts the screening process (Figure 2). All the abstracts were analyzed within an EndNote group to eliminate irrelevant and duplicated studies. Google translate was utilized to translate articles in other languages. Full text for a handful of articles was unavailable for a variety of reasons. These include lack of electronic copies, restrictions by foreign countries, incomplete scanning, and older manuscript dates.

4. Results

4.1. Review of the Literature

A systematic review of the literature revealed 90 cases of SCOGH, with the present report adding an additional case to the world literature. Other than English, the Spanish and French literature were the most reported languages identifying this clinical entity. Most reports include single cases with a literature review at the time of the publication. Several documents indicated the existence of only 60 cases prior to 1980 [26,27,28].
The first comprehensive review of SCOGH was published by Davey and Strange in 1954 [25]. This manuscript accounted for 34 inguinal and three femoral hernias and was inclusive of the prior 150 years and up to the date of publication [25]. A second review in 1960 added only 6 further cases of inguinal hernias with stomach contents to the literature [26].
The most recent review includes 21 cases from 1942 to 2020 of patients who presented with SCOGH [24]. Within this review, there were 10 patients who had GOO. This manuscript focused on the management of this condition with emphasis on patients presenting acutely because of perforation. This review was of the English literature only and was limited to reports digitally available. All patients with gastric perforation required laparotomy with one exception, which was addressed laparoscopically [24]. Our analysis identified 90 unique patients with SCOGH encompassing a period of over two centuries (1802 to 2022). In addition, we include a patient who presented to our institution in February of 2023 with GOO from SCOGH. Thus, a total of 91 patients (85 inguinal and 6 femoral) are included in the present review (Table 1). If available, patient characteristics and clinical presentation for each case are included in Table 2 and Table 3, inguinal and femoral cases, respectively.

4.1.1. History

The first case of a hernia sac containing stomach appeared in the literature in 1802 [21], and it was diagnosed at autopsy. The patient had been suffering from symptoms of this hernia for 32 years until his demise at age 64 [21]. It took 152 years for the first comprehensive and intriguing review to appear in the literature by Davey and Strange in 1954 [25]. This review included 34 inguinal and three femoral hernias. Our review adds 51 inguinal (including one of our own) and three femoral hernias to the world literature.
The first eight reports of SCOGH were documented at autopsy (n = 8 from 1802 to 1896) [21]. The first case of a femoral hernia containing stomach was documented by Keller in 1885 [29]. The first laparotomy performed identifying SCOGH occurred in 1897 [30]. The first radiographic evidence of SCOGH was first published in the literature in 1915 [30]. Successful outcomes for an emergent operation from SCOGH were initially described by Elischer in 1923 [31]. The first woman with SCOGH was reported in 1925 [25,32]. The first case of SCOGH repaired in the elective setting is credited to de Vernejoul and de Luna in 1925 [32].

4.1.2. Mechanism of Migration

Multiple mechanisms for the descent of the stomach into the groin have been proposed as early as 1912 by Chambard, [19] 1927 by Sicot, [33] and 1930 by Novaro [34]. Three mechanisms remain constant in the literature: (1) downward pulling of the omentum into the inguinal hernia sac; (2) chronicity [this is evidenced by our review, which found that the average of time of a hernia in patients with SCOGH was 23.1 ± 10.8 years (range 10 to 50 years)]; and (3) short stature of patients. Downward deviation of the diaphragm as a result of chronic COPD might also be a contributing factor [27]. Giant inguinoscrotal hernias, defined by the extension of the hernia down to midthigh while the patient is standing, has also been documented as a risk factor [35]. The likelihood of all mechanisms occurring in groin hernias simultaneously leading to SCOGH is so infrequent that in over more than two centuries less than 100 stomach-containing groin hernias have been reported in the literature.

4.1.3. Patient Demographics

The mean age for the entire cohort was 69.6 ± 12.9 years-old (range 28 to 87 years-old) (Table 1). Most patients were men overall, but female gender was more common in femoral hernias with SCOGH (66.7%). For 73 cases, laterality was included in the reports and 97.5% occurred on the left. Two cases reported bilateral hernias. Six patients had femoral hernias.
Table 1. Characteristics of patients presenting with stomach-containing groin hernias (n = 91).
Table 1. Characteristics of patients presenting with stomach-containing groin hernias (n = 91).
CharacteristicsInguinal (n = 85)Femoral (n = 6)
Age [Years (SD) *]74.2 (13.0)62.0 (11.5)
Sex [male (%)]95.233.3
Laterality [Left (%)]78.0100.0
* Standard Deviation.

4.1.4. Management

Nine inguinal and one femoral hernia containing stomach were reported at autopsy. These were all early reports (1802 to 1896). Elischer successfully operated emergently on two patients with SCOGH in 1923 [31]. The first hernia repaired in the elective setting was reported by de Vernejoul and de Luna in 1925 [32].
Heylen’s manuscript addressed the management of this condition with emphasis on patients presenting acutely because of gastric perforation. All patients with gastric perforation required laparotomy with one exception, which was addressed laparoscopically [24].
Conservative management was explicitly undertaken in 12 patients with SCOGH. The reasons for this approach were cited as high-risk operative candidates. Nasogastric decompression was initially undertaken in patients who presented with emesis or acute incarceration.

4.1.5. Complications

The mean duration for history of a hernia was 23.1 ± 10.8 years (range 10 to 50 years). Gastrointestinal symptoms related to obstruction (nausea, emesis, abdominal pain) were the most commonly reported symptoms (47.8%). GOO was reported in 17, absent in 14, and not reported in 61 patients. Five cases explicitly reported no symptoms. Gastric rupture was emphasized for some reports and in a manuscript review [24,36]. Other complications included aspiration pneumonia directly attributed to this entity [37]. Gastric volvulus in a patient with SCOGH was reported in one manuscript [38].

4.1.6. Mortality

Death directly attributed to SCOGH was reported in 21 cases (22.8%). However, most mortalities occurred in early publications (1802–1896 [n = 9] and 1910–1997 [n = 10]). Only two mortalities occurred in the recent era (2019 and 2021), but these patients were 75 and 84-years old, respectively. Only one death was identified from a femoral hernia containing stomach in a 47-year-old woman, which was reported in 1885 [29] (Table 2 and Table 3).
Table 2. Characteristics and clinical presentation for the 85 patients with stomach-containing inguinal hernias, ordered by chronological order of appearance in the literature.
Table 2. Characteristics and clinical presentation for the 85 patients with stomach-containing inguinal hernias, ordered by chronological order of appearance in the literature.
nReference, Year AgeSexLateralityClinical Presentation
1Lallement, 1802 [21]64MaleNRAbdominal pain/discomfort and vomiting
2Yvan, 1830 [39]NRMaleNRVomiting
3Febre, 1832 [40]73MaleRightNo symptoms
4Fogt, 1884 [41]60MaleLeftVomiting
5Schmidt, 1885 [42]65MaleLeftHematemesis and inguinal pain
6Chiari, 1888 [43]74MaleRightNo symptoms
7Lewin, 1893 [44]53MaleLeftEmesis and pain
8Chevereau, 1894 [45]77MaleLeftEmesis and pain
9Souligoux, 1896 [46]NRMaleLeftNR
10Brunner, 1897 [30]28MaleNRNR
11Hilgeneriner, 1910 [47]52FemaleLeftPain and vomiting
12Chambard, 1912 [19]62MaleLeftVomiting, pain, and an incarcerated hernia
13Rieder, 1915 [48]62MaleLeftHematemesis and melena
14Ahrens, 1920 [49]40MaleRightPain
15Maag, 1920 [50]81MaleLeftNo symptoms
16Stokes, 1922 [51]42MaleRightVomiting and an incarcerated hernia
17Elischer, 1923 [31]53MaleLeftNausea and an incarcerated hernia
18Elischer, 1923 [31]70MaleLeftIncarcerated hernia
19Dressen, 1925 [52]62MaleLeftVomiting, pain, and inguinal symptoms when eating
20de Vernejoul, 1925 [32]57FemaleLeftNR
21Sicot, 1927 [33]59MaleLeftPain, vomiting, and dyspepsia
22Lipkin, 1928 [53]60MaleLeftIncarcerated hernia
23Siegmund, 1929 [54]NRMaleRightNR
24Novaro, 1930 [34]53MaleRightVomiting, pain, and an irreducible hernia
25Rodzevich, 1935 [55]54MaleLeftVomiting and abdominal pain
26Oakley, 1937 [56]81MaleRightAbdominal and groin pain
27Herrmann, 1937 [57]80MaleLeftVomiting
28Lemaitre, 1937 [58]51MaleLeftDyspepsia
29Lust, 1937 [59]62MaleLeftNR
30Alexsandrovskiv, 1940 [60]73MaleLeftIncarcerated hernia
31Feldman, 1943 [61]66MaleRightNo symptoms
32Hartley, 1945 [62]67MaleLeftDyspepsia
33Simmons, 1949 [63]66MaleLeftNausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain
34Lewis, 1950 [64]69MaleRightOccasional vomiting
35Anger, 1952 [65]74MaleLeftVague symptoms
36Bernard, 1953 [66]NRNRNRNR
37Meinterz, 1953 [67]NRNRNRNR
38Davey, 1954 [25]61MaleLeftVomiting with markedly distended and tense abdomen
39Legrand, 1955 [68]NRNRNRNR
40D’Eshougues, 1956 [69] NRNRNRNR
41Allende, 1956 [70]NRNRNRNR
42Kislenskii, 1959 [71]NRNRLeftNR
43Hagarty, 1959 [72]NRNRNRNR
44Ship, 1960 [26]83MaleLeftPersistent nausea and vomiting
45Herrera, 1960 [73]NRNRNRNR
46Jackson, 1964 [74]NRNRNRStrangulation and perforation of the stomach in the inguinal canal
47Falugiani, 1968 aNRNRNRNR
48Gue, 1970 [75]NRNRNRNR
49Soudek, 1975 [76]NRNRNRNR
50Padmanabhan, 1976 [77]65MaleLeftNR
51Nagendran, 1977 [78]NRNRNRNR
52Rozencwajg, 1981 [79]NRNRNRNR
53Udwadia, 1984 [80]NRNRNRHematemesis
54Quaranta, 1984 [81]NRNRNRNR
55Resente,1986 [82]NRNRNRNR
56Naraynsingh, 1987 [83]62MaleLeftRecurrent bouts of vomiting, recurrent GOO
57Levy, 1987 [84]49MaleLeftAbdominal pain, nausea, and weight loss
58Loizate, 1988 [85]NRNRNRUpper gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage
59Broquet, 1992 [86]64FemaleBilateralPerforation of gastric ulcer within the hernia sac
60Diaz, 1997 [27]NRNRNRNR
61Diaz, 1997 [27]NRNRNRNR
62Walgenbach, 2001 [87]72MaleLeftA 6-h history of abdominal distension and pain
63Birnbaum, 2011 [88]86MaleRightNausea and vomiting
64Dogar, 2011 [89]65MaleLeftIrreducible groin bulge, abdominal pain, distention, darkish red vomitus, and obstipation
65Kerschaever, 2012 [90]79MaleLeftAnorexia, vomiting, and abdominal distension
66Ogul, 2013 [28]56MaleLeftRecurrent vomiting and bilateral incarcerated groin bulges
67Ferdinand, 2013 [38]73MaleRightIron deficiency anemia and gastric volvulus
68Fazekas, 2014 [37]85MaleLeftThree-day history of gastrointestinal obstructive symptoms
69Creedon, 2014 [91]87MaleLeftColicky abdominal pain for 48 h and vomiting
70Patel, 2014 [92]85MaleLeft3-day history of profuse vomiting and abdominal pain
71Lajevardi, 2015 [35]83MaleLeftFour-day history of vomiting and constipation
72Fitz, 2016 [14]46MaleBilateralSevere abdominal pain after dinner brought in by ambulance to the emergency department
73Mora-Guzman, 2016 [93]79MaleRightAbdominal pain and vomiting
74Periz-Pueyo, 2016 [94]61MaleLeftGastric necrosis secondary to an incarcerated inguinal hernia
75Nugud, 2017 [95]67MaleLeftBilious vomiting with abdominal pain
76Sayad, 2019 [96]50MaleNRSevere abdominal pain
77Junge, 2019 [97]75MaleLeftAbdominal pain and nausea
78Mehta, 2019 [98]75MaleLeft5-day history of hematemesis
79Heylen, 2020 [36]74MaleLeftDark vomitus and generalized abdominal tenderness
80Patel, 2021 a84MaleNRNausea, vomiting, constipation, GOO, peritonitis
81Vinod, 2021 [99]49MaleLeftAcute abdominal pain with nausea and dysuria
82Alexandre, 2022 [100]71MaleLeftNausea, vomiting, constipation, and GOO
83Grantham, 2022 [18]81MaleLettCoffee ground emesis
84Abbakar, 2022 [101]84MaleRightDouble GOO, abdominal pain and vomiting
85Huerta, 2023 a77MaleLeftAbdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and GOO
GOO = gastric outlet obstruction; NR = not recorded; a From posters, abstracts, presentations, and/or this research.
Table 3. Characteristics and clinical presentation for the 6 patients with stomach-containing femoral hernias, ordered by chronological order of appearance in the literature.
Table 3. Characteristics and clinical presentation for the 6 patients with stomach-containing femoral hernias, ordered by chronological order of appearance in the literature.
Reference, Year AgeSexLateralityClinical Presentation
Keller, 1885 [29]47FemaleLeftAbdominal pain and vomiting
Spiegel, 1920 [102]55FemaleLeftGastric strangulation
Cave, 1948 [103]56FemaleLeftDyspepsia
Davey, 1954 [25]68MaleLeftNo symptoms
Cade, 1984 [104]79FemaleLeftAbdominal pain, emesis, and hematemesis
Natsis, 2008 [20]67MaleLeftFindings at autopsy

5. Discussion

The present report discusses an unusual hernia in a HIC that was neglected for over 10 years and was not suspected of being stomach containing until the patient presented with GOO to our institution. The senior author of the present manuscript (SH) has performed nearly 2000 groin hernias in HICs and LMICs for the past twenty-years, and this is the first case of a SCOGH. Given the unusual finding of the hernia containing stomach, we performed a literature review to determine the incidence, natural history, and management of this conditions such that treatment options including observation could be offer to the patient that presented to our institution. This review might provide recommendations for surgeons encountering this uncommon type of hernia, especially in LMICs.
We offer the most comprehensive review of the literature today. Our review showed that the English, Spanish, and French literature were the dominant entities in publishing these reports. However, we have previously shown that emergent groin hernias are more commonly encountered in LMICs compared to HICs [22]. Thus, HICs that are less likely to encounter this entity due to earlier presentation of patients and more available diagnostic modalities are more likely to report it in the literature. The present data may serve as a staging platform for other surgeons encountering this entity to understand the incidence, natural history, and management of GOO from SCOGH. It is crucial to have this information available for surgeons in LMICs. Thus, open publications of GOO from SCOGH are essential.
Given our review of the literature, in case we encountered at our institution, the following elements were likely to play a role in the migration of the stomach to the groin: (1) chronicity [over ten years], (2) COPD, and (3) a giant inguinoscrotal hernia. But the differential diagnosis in the present case was a bowel obstruction (small or large) from an incarcerated hernia. While other diagnoses such as GOO from large hiatal hernia or adhesions would be possible, given the presence of an incarcerated groin hernia in the present report, excluded other possibilities. A finding of the NGT within the groin by KUB was diagnostic for this patient but it was confirmed by computed tomography.
Laterality and gender are important for migration of the stomach into the groin. Our analysis identified left laterality for 78% and 100% of the cases and male gender for 95% and 33% of the cases for inguinal and femoral hernias in patients with SCOGH, respectively. These findings are consistent with the patient encountered at our institution (a man with a long history of a left inguinal hernia).
Our review of the literature showed a clinical presentation for SCOGH that ranged from entirely asymptomatic to an acute abdomen. Overall, the most common complaint was related to obstructive symptoms, occurring in nearly half of the cases in our analysis. GOO from SCOGH occurred in 18.5% of cases. Thus, the present case adds a report to the world literature. It was important to review the literature to determine treatment options that could be offered to the patient in the present report.
Our review showed a wide spectrum of management strategies in patients with SCOGH from entirely conservative (n = 11; 12%), to elective operative intervention, to emergent operative management. Management varied from a groin approach with or without laparotomy for elective cases to laparotomy with or without a groin incision in emergent cases. One report documented an exclusively laparoscopic hernia repair [24]. Haylen’s manuscript provides an excellent review of the surgical approach depending on clinical presentation [24]. Thus, our review was important as it showed the permissibility of managing some of these patients conservatively. The patient in the present report elected not to undergo surgical intervention, but elective repair was offered both while he was in the hospital and during a follow up clinic appointment.
Given the case we encountered at our institution and our review of the literature, we found that GOO from SCOGH requires a high degree of suspicion. Inguinoscrotal hernias with a great deal of chronicity might raise suspicion of SCOGH. History and a physical exam should guide the differential diagnosis and exclude other forms of bowel obstruction leading to GOO. Computed tomography is definitive for the diagnosis. However, in the absence of tomography an NGT found in the groin by KUB should be diagnostic. Ultrasonography might also be helpful. In the absence of peritonitis, patients should be treated with bowel decompression and intravenous hydration. Elective repair via the posterior or anterior approach can be offered for patients depending on the comfort of the surgeon and on the surgical risk of the patient.
There are several limitations with this study. One of the most substantial limitations of our retrospective review emanates from the inability to accurately retrieve all the data from the medical charts. However, this is a limitation of all reviews of the literature. Another limitation of this study has to do with the references for each of the cases presented in our review. Several references were from older manuscripts and the initial citation was extracted from the reference list of the reviews included in this paper. However, they do not contain all the information that current reference databases extract for appropriately identifying these references in scholarly websites. However, as it is, the present manuscript should represent the best referenced manuscript for patients with SCOGH. Our review of the literature is limited by the likelihood that this condition is underreported. The underreporting of this entity is more likely to occur in LMICs where the incidence of GOO from SCOGH might be higher. Thus, publication bias is a highly likely limitation of this study. We should encourage authors from LMICs to publish their experience with unusual hernias to understand the true incidence of SCOGH.

6. Conclusions

Our review shows that GOO from SCOGH is uncommon and requires a high degree of suspicion. As in the present case report, patients might show symptoms related to GOO, though some patients may remain entirely asymptomatic as demonstrated in our review of the literature. Our patient elected not to proceed with surgical intervention and conservative management is permissible depending on clinical presentation, patient preferences, and operative risk. For SCOGH presenting with symptoms of GOO, immediate NGT decompression is encouraged and may allow for reduction of an initially incarcerated SCOGH and ultimately permit conservative or elective management. Modern diagnostic tools and contemporary management strategies allow for early identification and improved outcomes for patients with SCOGH.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.H., J.G.F. and M.B.A.; methodology, M.B.A. and J.G.F.; software, M.B.A. and J.G.F.; validation, KW., J.G.F. and M.B.A.; formal analysis, M.A, J.G.F., S.H., C.L.W., J.M. and S.H.; investigation, J.G.F., M.B.A., S.H., J.M. and C.L.W.; resources, J.G.F., M.B.A., S.H. and J.M.; data curation, J.G.F., M.B.A., S.H. and J.M.; writing—original draft preparation, J.G.F., M.B.A., S.H. and J.M.; writing—review and editing, J.G.F., M.B.A., S.H. and J.M.; visualization, J.G.F., M.B.A., S.H. and J.M.; supervision, S.H.; project administration, S.H.; funding acquisition, S.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Appropriate Institutional Board Review approval was not required for this systematic review.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this manuscript and is available upon request.

Data Availability Statement

All data presented within this manuscript is available as described in the methods section.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kingsnorth, A.; LeBlanc, K. Hernias: Inguinal and incisional. Lancet 2003, 362, 1561–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rutkow, I.M. Epidemiologic, economic, and sociologic aspects of hernia surgery in the United States in the 1990s. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 1998, 78, 941–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Isernia, R.M.; De Luca, G.M.; De Luca, A.; Franzoso, L.; Navazio, L.R.; Caruso, R.; Ferri, V.; Ielpo, B.; Giungato, S. Sliding ureteral inguinal hernia: An uncommon embryological trick. Case report and literature review. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2022, 94, 107006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sugumar, K.; Gupta, M. Anatomy, Abdomen and Pelvis: Inguinal Ligament (Crural Ligament. Poupart Ligament). In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ponka, J.L.; Brush, B.E. Sliding inguinal hernia in patients over 70 years of age. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1978, 26, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huerta, S.; Fairbanks, T.; Cinat, M. Incarcerated vesicoinguinal hernia presenting with gross hematuria. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2005, 201, 992–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dunn, T.M.; Markgraf, W.H. Littre hernia—Incarcerated Meckel’s diverticulum. Am. J. Surg. 1962, 103, 144–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Michalinos, A.; Moris, D.; Vernadakis, S. Amyand’s hernia: A review. Am. J. Surg. 2014, 207, 989–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Goyal, S.; Shrivastva, M.; Verma, R.; Goyal, S. “Uncommon contents of inguinal hernial sac”: A surgical dilemma. Indian J. Surg. 2015, 77, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ganesaratnam, M. Maydl’s hernia: Report of a series of seven cases and review of the literature. Br. J. Surg. 1985, 72, 737–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Taveras, L.R.; Huerta, S. A case report of a de Garengeot hernia in a nonagenarian veteran. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2017, 41, 301–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sidiqi, M.M.; Menezes, G. Asymptomatic herniation of ureter in the routine inguinal hernia: A dangerous trap for general surgeons. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2018, 49, 244–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Aldhafar, A.; Mohammed, A.; Alwabari, M.; Aldhafar, R. A Strangulated Right Inguinal Hernia Containing the Transverse Colon: An Unusual Case Report. Asian J. Case Rep. Surg. 2020, 5, 10–13. [Google Scholar]
  14. Fitz, E.; Chihara, R.; Stanton-Maxey, K.J. Gastric Perforation Associated with Bilateral Inguinal Hernias. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2016, 222, e12–e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tajti, J., Jr.; Pieler, J.; Abraham, S.; Simonka, Z.; Paszt, A.; Lazar, G. Incarcerated gallbladder in inguinal hernia: A case report and literature review. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020, 20, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, G.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, L.; Tang, D. Splenogonadal fusion: A case report and review of the literature. BMC Urol. 2021, 21, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Arredondo Montero, J.; Guillen Redondo, P.; Antona, G.; Bronte Anaut, M. Newborn inguinal hernia containing uterus, ovary and Fallopian tube. An. Pediatría (Engl. Ed.) 2023, 98, 232–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Grantham, T.A.; Ramachandran, R.; Parvataneni, S.; Gaduputi, V. Stomach within a Large Inguinal Hernia. Cureus 2022, 14, e24783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chambard, M.E. La hernie inguinale de l’estomac. Rev. Gynec. d’Obst. 1912, 19, 61–79. [Google Scholar]
  20. Natsis, K.; Apostolidis, S.; Papadopoulou, A.; Vlasis, K.; Totlis, T.; Skandalakis, P. Gastric femoral hernia in a male cadaver with gastroptosis: Case report and review of the literature. Hernia 2008, 12, 205–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lallement, L. Observation d’un entero-gastrocele. J. Med. Chir. Pharm. 1802, 1, 329. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ochoa-Hernandez, A.; Timmerman, C.; Ortiz, C.; Huertas, V.L.; Huerta, S. Emergent groin hernia repair at a County Hospital in Guatemala: Patient-related issues vs. health care system limitations. Hernia 2020, 24, 625–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. McInnes, M.D.; Moher, D.; Thombs, B.D.; McGrath, T.A.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Clifford, T.; Cohen, J.F.; Deeks, J.J.; Gatsonis, C.; Hooft, L. Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: The PRISMA-DTA statement. JAMA 2018, 319, 388–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Heylen, J.; Campioni-Norman, D.; Lowcock, D.; Varatharajan, L.; Kostalas, M.; Irukulla, M.; Ratnasingham, K. Inguinoscrotal hernias containing stomach: Risk of emergency presentation. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2021, 103, 713–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Davey, W.; Strange, S. The stomach as a content of inguinal and femoral herniae. Br. J. Surg. 1954, 41, 651–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ship, A.G.; Glick, A.H.; Goldenson, A.B. Incarceration of the stomach in an inguinal hernia: Report of a case. N. Engl. J. Med. 1960, 262, 78–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Diaz Oller, J.; Medina Dominguez, M.T.; Arcos Navarro, A.; Alia Diaz, J.J.; Asanza Llorente, J.A.; Numancia Andreu, M.B.; Nevado Infante, A.; Martos Torres, J.; Moya Vazquez, R.J. Stomach in inguinal-scrotal hernia. Rev. Esp. Enferm. Dig. 1997, 89, 325–328. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ogul, H.; Yuce, I.; Eren, S.; Kantarci, M. Bilateral inguinal hernia with uncommon content. Can. J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 27, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Keller, O. Schenkelhernie mit Magen als Inhalt. Inag. Diss. Bern. 1885. [Google Scholar]
  30. Brunner, F. Kleinere Mittheilungen: Ein Fall von Hernia ventriculi inguinalis incarcerata. Zentralbl. Chir. 1897, 24, 919–921. [Google Scholar]
  31. Elisscher, E.V. Ibid 1923, 50, 1814.
  32. de Vernejoul, M.C.; de Luna, D. Sociétés de province: Société de Chirurgie de Marseille: Volumineuse hernie inguinale renfermant l’estomac et les annexes gauches. Pr. Med. 1925, 33, 208. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sicot, R. Contribu a l’Etude des Hernies inguinales de l’Etomc. These de Paris 1927. [Google Scholar]
  34. Novaro, N. Arch. Ital. Chir. 1920, 27, 483.
  35. Lajevardi, S.S.; Gundara, J.S.; Collins, S.A.; Samra, J.S. Acute Gastric Rupture in a Giant Inguinoscrotal Hernia. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2015, 19, 2283–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Heylen, J.; Campioni-Norman, D. Bilateral inguinoscrotal hernia with gastric contents and subsequent perforation: Lessons in operative management. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2020, 77, 853–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Fazekas, B.; Frecker, P.; Francis, L.; Patel, K. Aspiration pneumonia as a complication of a rare type of hernia. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2014, 5, 1061–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ferdinand, E.; Amir, R.; Manjunath, S. Serendipity of giant proportions. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 11, A25–A26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yvan. Arch. Gen. Med. 1830, 22, 139.
  40. Febre, J.A. These de Paris 1832, 132.
  41. Fogt, L. Arztl. Zntelligenzbl 1884, 31, 285.
  42. Schmidt, M. Berl. Klin. Wschr. 1885, 22.
  43. Chiari, H. Prag. Med. Wschr. 1888, 13, 115.
  44. Lewin, T.F. Ann. Soc. Belge Chir. 1893, 1.
  45. Chevereau, P. Bull. Soc. Anat. Paris 1894, 8.
  46. Souligoux. Bull. Soc. Anat. Paris 1896, 10.
  47. Hilgenreiner, H. Siltene und bemerkenswerte Hernien. Beitr. Klin. Chir. 1910, 69, 333–430. [Google Scholar]
  48. Rieder, H. Fortschr. Riintgensrr. 1915, 23.
  49. Ahrens, P. Zbl. Chir. 1920, 47.
  50. Maag, O. Dtsh. Z. Chir. 1920, 152.
  51. Stokes, A.F. Med. F. Aust. 1922, 2.
  52. Dressen, J. Stomach in Inguinal Hernia. Edinb. Med. J. 1925, 32, 774. [Google Scholar]
  53. Lipkin, L.N. Odessky Med. J. 1928, 3.
  54. Siegmund, H. Hand Book de Spesillen Paht. Anat. U. Histo 1929, 4.
  55. Rodzevich, E.V. Vestn. Khir. Grekov. 1935, 41.
  56. Oakley, R.H. Strangulation of right inguinal hernia cotaining part of the stomach with simultaneus perforation of a gastric ulcer. Br. J. Surg. 1937, 25, 454–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Herrmann, J. Cas. Lek. Ces 1937, 76.
  58. Lemaitre, L. Bull. Soc. Radiol. Med. Paris 1937, 25.
  59. Lust, F.J. Herniation of the stomach into the scrotum. Am. J. Roentgenol. 1937, 37, 666–667. [Google Scholar]
  60. Alexsandrovskiy, D.G.; Degtyarev, I.G. Vrac. Dyelo 1940, 22.
  61. Feldman, J.J.M.; TIturrioz, T. Sem. Med. G. Aires 1943, 1.
  62. Hartley, J.B. Diverticulum of stomach found to enter left inguinal hernial sac. Br. J. Radiol. 1945, 18, 231–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Simmons, H. Perforation of stomach in scrotal hernia. Br. Med. J. 1949, 1, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lewis, T.F.; Ross, P.S. Inguinal herniation of stomach: Case report. Ohio State Med. J. 1950, 46, 987–988. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Anger, H. Extreme Gastroenteroptose bei beiderseitben Scrotalhernien. Fortschr. Roentgenstr. 1952, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bernard, A. Inguino-scrotal hernia of the stomach. Arch. Mal. Appar. Dig. Mal. Nutr. 1953, 42, 1400–1403. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. Meinertz, O. Inguinal hernia with the stomach functioning as hernial sac content. Fortschr. Geb. Rontgenstr. 1953, 79, 400–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Legrand, J.; Tesson, A. Estomac et hernie scrotale: Présentation de clichés. J. Radiol. Electrol. 1955, 36, 246. [Google Scholar]
  69. Robert D’Eshougucs, J.; Miniconi, P.; Clerget, O.; Scotto, J.C. Une ptose gastrointestinale peu banale (hernie inguinale de l’estomac). Algérie Mèd. 1956, 60, 1043. [Google Scholar]
  70. Allende, C.I. Hernia escrotal de estómago. Bol. Trab. Soc. Cir. Buenos Aires 1956, 40, 548–551. [Google Scholar]
  71. Kislenskii, I.F. Left-sided scrotal inguinal hernia, containing the stomach, cecum, ascending & transverse colon. Khirurgiia 1959, 35, 99–100. [Google Scholar]
  72. Hagarty, G. The stomach in an inguinal hernia. Med. J. Aust. 1959, 46, 403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Herrera, C.A. Large inguinoscrotal hernia containing the stomach. Prensa Med. Argent. 1960, 47, 2443. [Google Scholar]
  74. Jackson, F.C.; Brown, J.C.; Stiegel, D.D. Strangulation and perforation of the stomach in an inguinal hernia. Am. Surg. 1964, 30, 677–681. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  75. Gue, S. Spontaneous rupture of stomach, a rare complication of inguinal hernia. J. Br. Surg. 1970, 57, 154–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Soudek, K.; Súna, Z. Study of a rare ectopic localization ofthe stomach in a large scrotal hernial. Rozhl. Chir. 1975, 54, 336–337. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  77. Padmanabhan, A.I.; Lowenfels, A.B. Letter: An unusual hernia. JAMA 1976, 235, 2813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Nagendran, T. Stomach contained in a giant scrotal hernia. Am. Surg. 1977, 43, 473–476. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  79. Rozencwajg, J. Stomach rupture in inguino-scrotal hernia. Acta Chir. Belg. 1981, 80, 159–160. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  80. Udwadia, T. Stomach strangulated in inguinal hernia presenting with hematemesis. Int. Surg. 1984, 69, 177–179. [Google Scholar]
  81. Quaranta, M.; Rivetti, R.; Cartia, Q. Rare case of inguino-scrotal hernia containing the stomach. Minerva Chir. 1984, 39, 1757–1759. [Google Scholar]
  82. Resente, F.; Corbetti, F.; Bettini, F. Inguinal hernia of the stomach. A case. Radiol. Med. 1986, 72, 597–598. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  83. Naraynsingh, V.; Sieunarine, K.; Raju, G. Recurrent gastric outlet obstruction due to an inguinal hernia. Postgrad. Med. J. 1987, 63, 905–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Levy, I.; Ebbs, S.R. Inguinal hernia: An unusual cause of dyspepsia. Br. J. Surg. 1987, 74, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Loizate Totoricaguena, A.; Lamíquiz Vallejo, A. Stomach incarcerated in an inguinal hernia as a cause of upper digestive hemorrhage. Rev. Esp. Enferm. Apar. Dig. 1988, 74, 172–174. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Prêtre, R.; Broquet, P.E.; Robert, J.; Rohner, A. Perforation of gastric ulcer in inguinal hernia. J. Chir. 1992, 129, 218–220. [Google Scholar]
  87. Walgenbach, K.J.; Lauschke, H.; Brunagel, G.; Hirner, A. An uncommon form of gastric rupture in giant scrotal hernia. Zentralbl Chir. 2001, 126, 1015–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Birnbaum, D.J.; Grègoire, E.; Campan, P.; Hardwigsen, J.; Le Treut, Y.P. A large inguinoscrotal hernia with stomach content. ANZ J. Surg. 2011, 81, 86–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Dogar, M.; Chaudhary, A. Inguinal hernia containing stomach, transverse colon and small bowel. Pak. J. Med. Health Sci. 2011, 5. [Google Scholar]
  90. Kerschaever, I.; Poelmans, S.; Vankeirsbilck, J.; Vandewoude, M. Rare cause of gastric outlet obstruction: Incarcerated pylorus within an inguinal hernia. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2012, 94, e46–e48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Creedon, L.; Peacock, O.; Singh, R.; Awan, A. Gastric outlet obstruction secondary to incarcerated pylorus in an inguinal hernia. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2014, 96, e26–e27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Patel, K.; Francis, L.; Fazekas, B.; Panthagani, J. Unusual contents of a large incarcerated inguinal hernia. BMJ Case Rep. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Mora-Guzman, I.; Munoz de Nova, J.L.; di Martino, M.; Marin-Perez, E. Antro gástrico como contenido insólito de una hernia inguinal. Rev. Chil. Cir. 2016, 68, 281–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Pueyo Périz, E.M.; Andrés Pérez, S.; García Tejero, A.; García Fernández, C. Gastric necrosis secondary to inguinal incarceration. Cir. Esp. 2016, 94, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Nugud, A.A.; Nugud, S. Long-standing asymptomatic Inguinoscrotal hernia. Sultan Qaboos Univ. Med. J. 2017, 17, 250–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Sayad, P.; Tan, A.Z. A case report of a gastric perforation in a giant inguinoscrotal hernia: A two-step approach. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2019, 55, 174–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Junge, K.; Otto, J.; Oral, H. A Rare Cause of Gastric Outlet Stenosis—Scrotal Hernia. Dtsch. Ärzteblatt Int. 2019, 116, 507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Mehta, T.; Weissman, S.; Vash, A.; Yim, D.; Serrano, O. Gastric Inguinoscrotal Hernia. ACG Case Rep. J. 2019, 6, e00187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Vinod, V.C.; Younis, M.U. Gastric strangulation and perforation caused by a giant inguinal-scrotal hernia. Turk. J. Emerg. Med. 2021, 21, 122–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Alexandre, K.; Vandeveer, Z.; Barnwell, J.M.; Vandeveer, Z.T. A Rare Case of Left Inguinoscrotal Hernia Containing Stomach. Cureus 2022, 14, e30838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Abbakar, M.; Ahmed, S.; Lim, M. EP-25 Double Gastric Outlet Obstruction Caused by an Incarcerated Right Inguinal Hernia, a Rare Presentation. Br. J. Surg. 2022, 109, znac245-006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Spiegel, B. Einklemmung des Magens im Schenkelbruch. Zbl Chir. 1920, 16, 373–374. [Google Scholar]
  103. Cave, P. Stomach in a Femoral Hernia. Br. J. Radiol. 1948, 21, 143–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Cade, R.J.; Lane, R.H. Strangulated stomach within a femoral hernia. Postgrad. Med. J. 1984, 60, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A), Sagittal computed tomography image of the abdomen depicting the stomach extending into the left groin causing gastric outlet obstruction. (B), Coronal radiograph of the abdomen depicting the tip of the nasogastric tube in the left groin (arrow).
Figure 1. (A), Sagittal computed tomography image of the abdomen depicting the stomach extending into the left groin causing gastric outlet obstruction. (B), Coronal radiograph of the abdomen depicting the tip of the nasogastric tube in the left groin (arrow).
Jcm 13 00155 g001
Figure 2. PRISMA flow-chart describing the process of our literature search. * Total number of patients includes our present case.
Figure 2. PRISMA flow-chart describing the process of our literature search. * Total number of patients includes our present case.
Jcm 13 00155 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Favela, J.G.; Argo, M.B.; McAllister, J.; Waldrop, C.L.; Huerta, S. Gastric Outlet Obstruction from Stomach-Containing Groin Hernias: Case Report and a Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010155

AMA Style

Favela JG, Argo MB, McAllister J, Waldrop CL, Huerta S. Gastric Outlet Obstruction from Stomach-Containing Groin Hernias: Case Report and a Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(1):155. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010155

Chicago/Turabian Style

Favela, Juan G., Madison B. Argo, Jared McAllister, Caitlyn L. Waldrop, and Sergio Huerta. 2024. "Gastric Outlet Obstruction from Stomach-Containing Groin Hernias: Case Report and a Systematic Review" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 1: 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010155

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop