Next Article in Journal
Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion—Current Evidence and Future Directions
Next Article in Special Issue
Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders and Oral Cancer in Saudi Arabia: An Epidemiological Review of the Literature
Previous Article in Journal
International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision Surrogates of the Modified Frailty Index and 12-Month Referral to the Hospital in an Older Population from Germany
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genomic Immune Evasion: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Opportunities in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 12
Issue 23
10.3390/jcm12237291
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Expression of p53, p63, p16, Ki67, Cyclin D, Bcl-2, and CD31 Markers in Actinic Keratosis, In Situ Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Normal Sun-Exposed Skin of Elderly Patients

by
Alise Balcere
1,*,
Māris Sperga
2,
Ingrīda Čēma
3,
Gunārs Lauskis
3,
Maksims Zolovs
4,5,
Māra Rone Kupfere
1 and
Angelika Krūmiņa
6
1
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Riga Stradiņš University, LV-1010 Riga, Latvia
2
Department of Pathology of Infectious Diseases, Riga East University Hospital, LV-1006 Riga, Latvia
3
Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Medicine, Riga Stradiņš University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia
4
Statistics Unit, Riga Stradiņš University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia
5
Institute of Life Sciences and Technology, Daugavpils University, LV-5401 Daugavpils, Latvia
6
Department of Infectiology, Riga Stradiņš University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(23), 7291; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237291
Submission received: 1 October 2023 / Revised: 12 November 2023 / Accepted: 17 November 2023 / Published: 24 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Potentially Malignant Disorders and Cancers of Head and Neck Region—Series 2)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Age and cumulative exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light are primary contributors to skin cancer development. Regulatory proteins within the cell cycle are essential for the homeostasis of squamous epithelium. Methods: This study assessed the expression of immunohistochemical markers p53, p63, p16, Ki67, Cyclin D, Bcl-2, and CD31 in keratinocyte intraepithelial neoplasia (actinic keratosis and squamous cell carcinoma in situ) compared to normal skin. The objective was to distinguish disease-specific changes from those attributable to ageing and sun exposure in elderly skin. Results. Analysis included 22 actinic keratoses (AK), 7 in situ squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), and 8 normal skin biopsies. The mean age was 78.1 years for the AK/SCC group and 73.8 years for controls, with no significant age difference noted between the groups. The AK/SCC group exhibited a higher occurrence of amorphous masses, higher intensity of p53, lower Bcl-2 expression in the epidermis, higher Bcl-2 expression in the dermis, and higher CD31 expression in the dermis, all of which were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The study identifies distinct differences in the presence of amorphous masses and the expression levels of p53, Bcl-2, and CD31 between sun-exposed skin and in situ cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas, including actinic keratoses.

1. Introduction

Cumulative ultraviolet (UV) damage constitutes the principal environmental factor leading to keratinocyte intraepithelial neoplasia and the subsequent emergence of skin cancer. Actinic keratoses (AK), often classed as either precancerous lesions or squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) in situ, are prevalent conditions in general and dermatological practice [1,2,3,4,5]. These lesions typically develop in older individuals with fair skin. Their prevalence demonstrably increases from the third decade of life and exceeds 90% in individuals beyond 80 years of age [5,6]. Morphologically, AK and SCC are widely regarded as existing on a continuous nosological spectrum but at distinct evolutionary stages [7]. Histopathologically, AK is distinguished by basal keratinocyte atypia, characterized by loss of polarization, cellular crowding, and overlapping. In more advanced stages, this atypia can encompass nearly the entire thickness of the epidermis. AK is stratified into three grades based on the extent of vertical involvement by atypical keratinocytes: Grade I involves the lower third, Grade II extends to the lower two-thirds, and Grade III affects more than two-thirds of the epidermis without reaching full-thickness [8]. The bowenoid subtype of AK, notable for its full-thickness atypia, complicates differentiation from SCC in situ. Dermatoscopically, bowenoid AK is marked by a uniform distribution of glomerular vessels and the lesion is found within a cancerization field. This contrasts with Bowen’s disease, a type of SCC in situ which displays a dermatoscopic pattern of irregularly distributed, clustered vessels, and is typically not associated with field cancerization [5]. Although bowenoid AK is typically described as exhibiting full-thickness dysplasia without adnexal involvement [9], Fernández-Figueras et al. [10] have observed that AK, even when confined to the lower third of the epidermis, may extend into adnexal structures. In this study, lesions with full-thickness involvement are unequivocally classified as SCC in situ.
The p53, p63, p16, Ki67, Cyclin D, and Bcl-2 proteins are essential regulators of the cell cycle [1,2,3,4,5,7], contributing not only to the development and homeostasis of squamous epithelium [11,12] but also to tumor genesis [13,14]. Their expression is modified by both age [15,16] and UV radiation exposure [12,17,18,19]. Specifically, p53 is a tumor-suppressor protein that interrupts the cell cycle to permit DNA repair [20]. The mutation and subsequent inactivation of p53 mark a critical early pathogenic step in SCC development, as this dysfunction allows cells to evade apoptosis, leading to the clonal proliferation of the mutated cells [21]. Multiple studies have documented the overexpression of p53 in precancerous skin lesions and SCC, as well as in skin after sun exposure, with elevated p53 levels recognized as a biomarker of recent sun exposure [22]. Increased p53 has been associated with progression from AK to SCC [13].
p63, a member of the p53 family of transcription factors, plays a pivotal role in keratinocyte differentiation across various stages. While p63 is abundantly expressed in the basal and suprabasal layers of normal epidermis, its expression diminishes in the upper spinous layer and is absent in the granular and cornified layers. Aberrant p63 expression is a hallmark of SCC across different organ sites, contributing to oncogenesis by disrupting numerous cell processes, including the inhibition of oncogene-induced keratinocyte senescence and reducing the function of other p53 family members [23,24].
Cyclin D1 plays an important role for the G1-S phase transition within the cell cycle. It activates CDK4 and CDK6, leading to the phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein, which in turn initiates transcription and activates proteins involved in the G1 checkpoint passage and S phase entry. Cyclin D1 overexpression truncates the G1 phase resulting in abnormal proliferation [25]. In situ SCCs have demonstrated more prevalent diffuse immunostaining of cyclin D1 compared to AK, suggesting a role in AK progression [26].
The p16 protein, encoded by the CDKN2A gene, impedes the cell cycle’s progression from the G1 to S phase by binding to and inactivating CDK4 and CDK6. It interacts with retinoblastoma and p53 tumor-suppressor genes in its role as a cell cycle inhibitor [27]. UV radiation activates p16, and p16-expressing cells have been detected in AK lesions. In a mouse model, persistent p16 expression in a subset of epidermal cells was shown to induce hyperplasia and dysplasia, promoting tumor formation after mutagenesis [16].
Ki67, a nuclear antigen, is a marker of cell proliferation across various cycle phases (G1, S, G2, M) and is absent in the quiescent phase (G0). Ki67 expression correlates with mitotic count and is employed as a surrogate marker for assessing the rate of proliferation, which is crucial for the diagnosis, classification, and prognosis of various neoplasms. SCC arising from AK through the differentiated pathway exhibits significantly higher Ki67 scores compared to the classical pathway. This increased proliferation also explains the progression of AK from a lesion with basal atypia into a bowenoid neoplasia with complete replacement of the epidermis by atypical cells and frequent mitoses in all epithelial layers [28].
The BCL-2 gene (B-cell lymphoma-2) encodes a protein that inhibits apoptosis. Within normal skin, Bcl-2-positive basal cells serve as a reservoir for the renewal of squamous epithelium [29]. In sun-exposed skin, Bcl-2 prevents UV-induced cell death [30]. An upregulation of this anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 protein is implicated in the progression from AK to SCC [12]. Additionally, Bcl-2 can label inflammatory cell infiltrate [31] and, within the complex process of cancer development, the extent of dermal infiltrate correlates significantly with keratinocyte atypia, mitotic count, and adnexal involvement [32].
CD31 is recognized as a highly sensitive and specific endothelial marker in paraffin tissue samples [33]. Neovascularisation plays a critical role in tumor development and progression. Studies have previously demonstrated a significant increase in the microvascular area corresponding with the transition from AK to cutaneous SCC [34].
In this cross-sectional study, we compared the expression of immunohistochemical markers—p53, p63, p16, Ki67, Cyclin D, Bcl-2, and CD31—between a group presenting with intraepithelial keratinocyte neoplasia, specifically AK and SCC in situ (experimental group), and a control group with normal-appearing skin. Our objective was to discern which marker associations are unique to the disease and which can be anticipated in elderly skin exposed to sunlight. To our knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate these seven immunohistochemical markers concurrently in AK and SCC in situ, and healthy sun-exposed skin. The findings derived from this study are anticipated to lay the groundwork for subsequent investigations into the relationship between immunohistochemical marker expression and clinical as well as dermatoscopic characteristics.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Population

Considering the increased prevalence of AK and SCC among the aging population, our study included elderly fair-skinned individuals. These patients underwent examination by a board-certified dermatologist who diagnosed and selected the biopsy sites for AK or SCC in situ. The extent of sun damage was quantified using the AK field assessment scale [35] according to which all participants exhibited moderate to severe photodamage, necessitating more frequent follow-up consultations. Evaluated parameters included the count of AK lesions, evidence of field cancerization, wrinkles, pigmentation changes, telangiectasia, and cutaneous atrophy. Our patient sample did not have significant occupational sun exposure. However, given the prevalence of outdoor activities in the Latvian population and the low use of sunscreen among the elderly cohort, incidental sun exposure was considered noteworthy.

2.2. Tissue Samples

A 3 to 4 mm punch biopsy was taken from lesions clinically and dermatoscopically diagnosed as AK or SCC in situ. These samples underwent routine histopathological evaluation and were included in the study following confirmation of the diagnosis by a study-unrelated pathologist. Control biopsies were prospectively collected from the maxillofacial surgery department specifically from lateral margins of elliptical excisions or remnant tissues from flap preparations. In total, the following number of biopsies were included: 22 from AK, 7 from SCC in situ, and 8 control biopsies. All patients from whom samples were obtained were identified as Caucasian, and all biopsies originated from facial tissue.

2.3. Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Analyses

The extent of atypical keratinocytes within the epidermis was stratified into three grades, as delineated by Röwert-Huber et al. [4]. Similarly, the basal growth pattern was assessed and categorized into three grades (protruding I–III) following the criteria established by Schmitz et al. [36].
Immunohistochemical staining was carried out on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue using both a DAKO Autostainer Plus (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) and Ventana Benchmark XT automated immunostainer (Ventana Medical System, Tuscon, AZ, USA). Detailed information regarding the monoclonal antibodies, clones, dilutions, incubation times, and manufacturers is presented in Table 1. All staining procedures included the use of appropriate controls.
Nuclear staining for p16, p53, and p63 was deemed positive, regardless of any associated cytoplasmic staining. The expression levels of p16 and p53 were semi-quantitatively assessed using predefined thresholds: <1%, 1–30%, 30–50%, and >50% for p16 and weak staining (if any), <5%, 5–50%, and >50% for p53. The epidermal distribution of p53, p63, Ki67, CyclinD, and Bcl-2 staining was categorized similarly to the extent of cellular atypia observed in hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections, with five distinct groups: no expression, expression in the lower third, expression up to the lower two-thirds, expression above two-thirds, and full-thickness expression. CD31 expression was quantified by manually counting positively stained vessels across three 20× magnification fields and semi-quantitatively classified into three categories: isolated, scattered peri-vascular inflammatory cells; foci of moderately pronounced inflammation; and areas of pronounced inflammation.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The independent sample T-test was employed to evaluate the age difference between the experimental and control groups, predicated on the data’s normal distribution, verified by the Shapiro–Wilk test and normal Q-Q plots, and homogeneity was confirmed by Levene’s test. Fisher’s exact test was performed to investigate the association between the patterns of expression. The p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using Jamovi Version 2.3.28, retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org, accessed on 11 July 2023.

2.5. Ethics

All patients provided their informed written consent before the biopsies were taken. The study conformed to the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the relevant local ethics committees.

3. Results

Table 2 summarizes the demographic, pathological, and immunohistochemical characteristics. Mean age exceeded 73 years with no significant difference between experimental and control groups (p > 0.05). Both groups had a female predominance.
Sunscreen use was evaluated within the patient cohort. Among female participants, 27.3% reported consistently using sunscreen on sunny days. Conversely, all male participants denied any sunscreen use. However, this observed difference in sunscreen usage between genders was not statistically significant.
As expected, our findings revealed that there are statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in the presence and extent of cellular dysplasia, as well as the degree of protruding, between AK/SCC samples and control biopsies. These differences are markers for distinguishing AK/SCC lesions.
Furthermore, statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between the experimental and control groups in various evaluations, including the presence of amorphous masses, the intensity of p53, the extent of Bcl-2 in epidermal layers, quantitative expression of Bcl-2 in the epidermis, subepidermal infiltration of Bcl-2, and the amount of CD31 dermal infiltrate. Representative images of the expression of immunohistochemical markers can be found in Figure 1 and Figure 2.

4. Discussion

Exposure to ultraviolet (UV) light is the primary environmental factor responsible for the onset and progression of skin cancer. Consequently, areas of the skin that are frequently exposed to sunlight, such as the face, are the most common sites for the development of skin cancer [5,37,38].
In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of histopathological and immunohistochemical markers between samples of normal skin and intraepidermal keratinocyte neoplasia, specifically AK and in situ SCC, which were collected prospectively. Additionally, we evaluated the potential impact of age and UV exposure on the expression of immunohistochemical markers by focusing on a cohort of elderly patients [15,17,39]. The patient cohort in our study was predominantly female. This predominance is noteworthy given that AKs are typically more frequently diagnosed in men, who, due to higher rates of baldness, often have greater skin exposure to the sun. Nonetheless, our findings align with other studies that have similarly reported a higher incidence of AKs among women [40,41,42]. Furthermore, the predominance of women in our study sample may be attributed to the differences in life expectancy between genders in Latvia, where in 2021, it was 68.2 years for men and 77.9 years for women. This is particularly relevant given that the mean age of our patient cohort was 78.1 years [43]. Contrary to the common perception that women tend to use a broader range of cosmetic products, including sunscreens, more frequently than men, our study’s findings did not show a statistically significant gender difference in sunscreen use. However, the use of moisturizing creams exhibited a notable gender disparity, with 66.7% of women in our cohort using these products compared to none of the men.
In summary, our study identified differences in the prevalence of amorphous masses, the intensity of p53 staining, and the levels of Bcl-2 and CD31 expression.
In the majority of AK and SCC cases, we identified amorphous masses, a finding not seen in any of the control biopsies. This observation aligns with findings from previous research, which reported a high incidence of severe solar elastosis in cutaneous SCC [44,45]. Severe solar elastosis, marked by the substitution of dermal collagen with elastotic material, results from prolonged and excessive UV damage [44].
The abnormal expression of p53 is considered a marker of premalignant lesions and plays a central role in the development of SCC [20]. A notable increase in p53 staining correlates with aging and exposure to sunlight, while its expression diminishes with the consistent application of sunscreen [37]. Essentially, progression from AK to SCC is associated with increased p53 staining [13,15,46]. Simultaneously, research by Piipponen et al. identified a fraction of AK, in situ SCC (8%), and cutaneous SCC (11%) lesions that were p53 negative, suggesting a possible nonsense mutation in the tumor protein 53 gene leading to the absence of functional p53 protein [47]. Similarly, Neto et al. found a higher incidence of SCC adjacent to AK lesions where less than 25% of cells were p53 positive [20]. In our study, we saw a slightly higher intensity of p53 staining in the AK/SCC cohort, aligning with the literature, while no notable differences were found in the pattern or extent of p53 expression across the epidermal layers between the two groups. Similarly, as observed by Neto et al. [20] and Piipponen et al. [47], not all AK cases in our study showed p53 expression. More than 5% immunoreactivity to p53 was observed in 75.8% of the AK/SCC samples and the staining was considered strong in 44.8% of the cases.
Bcl-2 is an antiapoptotic molecule located in the mitochondrial membrane. Alteration of its function can promote cancer development. Prior research has noted an increase in Bcl-2 expression in AK [48]. Additionally, studies have indicated a significantly higher prevalence of Bcl-2-positive tumor cells in SCC compared to asymptomatic AK. Furthermore, a stepwise increase in Bcl-2 expression has been documented from asymptomatic AK to inflamed AK and subsequently to SCC, suggesting a pathway of progression through inflamed AK [46]. Our results agree with previous studies, showing higher expression of Bcl-2 in the epidermis of both AK and in situ SCC samples. Moreover, Bcl-2 stained dermal inflammatory cells and inflammation is associated with a progression of AK to SCC due to its role in generating reactive oxygen species and fostering immune responses, cellular transformation, survival, proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis [48,49,50]. Our results also revealed that both the Bcl-2 subepidermal infiltrate and CD31 expression, which is the most sensitive and specific endothelial marker in paraffin-embedded sections [33], are elevated in the AK/SCC samples compared to controls.
One of the strengths of this study is that all the biopsies were consistently taken from the facial area. The results obtained allow us to further analyze associations between dermatoscopical features and p53, CD31, and Bcl-2 expression within the same cohort and avoid analyzing markers that showed no difference with the control group. Such insights have the potential to expand our understanding of the interplay between dermatoscopic characteristics and immunohistochemical marker expression. This could also potentially enhance the diagnostic precision of dermoscopy by pinpointing features that correlate with more aggressive histological and immunohistochemical profiles, such as adnexal involvement, protruding, and increased expression of p53, CD31, and Bcl-2.

5. Conclusions

The presence of amorphous masses and the expression of p53, Bcl-2, and CD31 differ between sun-exposed skin and cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas in situ, including actinic keratoses.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B., M.S., I.Č., G.L., M.R.K. and A.K.; methodology, A.B., M.S., G.L., I.Č. and M.Z.; software, M.Z.; formal analysis, A.B. and M.Z.; investigation, A.B., M.S., I.Č., G.L., M.R.K. and A.K.; resources, M.S., I.Č., G.L. and A.K.; data curation, A.B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B.; writing—review and editing, A.B., M.S., I.Č., G.L., M.Z., M.R.K. and A.K.; visualization, A.B.; supervision, M.S., A.K., M.R.K. and I.Č.; project administration, A.B.; funding acquisition, A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by funded by ESF project no. 8.2.2.0/20/I/004 “Support for involving doctoral students in scientific research and studies” at Riga Stradinš University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Riga Stradiņš University (protocol code 50/22.02.2018. date of approval 22 February 2018 and protocol code 22-2/548/2021, date of approval 3 December 2021) and Riga East University Hospital (protocol code ZD/08-07/01-21/18, date of approval 7 December 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data is available upon reasonable request. The data are not publicly available due to the continuous nature of the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Schmitz, L.; Oster-Schmidt, C.; Stockfleth, E. Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer—From Actinic Keratosis to Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2018, 16, 1002–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tizek, L.; Schielein, M.C.; Seifert, F.; Biedermann, T.; Böhner, A.; Zink, A. Skin Diseases Are More Common than We Think: Screening Results of an Unreferred Population at the Munich Oktoberfest. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2019, 33, 1421–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dziunycz, P.J.; Schuller, E.; Hofbauer, G.F.L. Prevalence of Actinic Keratosis in Patients Attending General Practitioners in Switzerland. Dermatology 2018, 234, 186–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rowert-Huber, J.; Patel, M.J.; Forschner, T.; Ulrich, C.; Eberle, J.; Kerl, H.; Sterry, W.; Stockfleth, E.; Ro, J.; Röwert-Huber, J.; et al. Actinic Keratosis Is an Early in Situ Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Proposal for Reclassification. Br. J. Dermatol. 2007, 156, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Reinehr, C.P.H.; Bakos, R.M. Actinic Keratoses: Review of Clinical, Dermoscopic, and Therapeutic Aspects. Bras. Dermatol. 2019, 94, 637–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Flohil, S.C.; Van Der Leest, R.J.T.; Dowlatshahi, E.A.; Hofman, A.; De Vries, E.; Nijsten, T. Prevalence of Actinic Keratosis and Its Risk Factors in the General Population: The Rotterdam Study. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2013, 133, 1971–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Papageorgiou, C.; Lallas, A.; Manoli, S.M.; Longo, C.; Lai, M.; Liopyris, K.; Lallas, K.; Lazaridou, E.; Apalla, Z. Evaluation of Dermatoscopic Criteria for Early Detection of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Arising on an Actinic Keratosis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2022, 86, 791–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fernandez Figueras, M.T. From Actinic Keratosis to Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Pathophysiology Revisited. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2017, 31, 5–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Şahin, N.; Bozdaǧ, Z.; Erkiliç, S.; Aydin, N.E.; Şener, S. Histopathological Subtyping of Actinic Keratosis and It’s Coexistence with Nonmelanotic Skin Cancers in Gaziantep and Malatya Regions. Turkderm—Turk Arch Dermatol Venereol 2016, 50, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fernández-Figueras, M.T.; Saenz-Sardà, X.; Vargas, P.; Thompson, C.T.; Carrato, C.; Puig, L.; Ferrándiz, C.; Ariza, A. The Depth of Follicular Extension in Actinic Keratosis Correlates with the Depth of Invasion in Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Implication for Clinical Treatment. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2018, 32, 1657–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Moses, M.A.; George, A.L.; Sakakibara, N.; Mahmood, K.; Ponnamperuma, R.M.; King, K.E.; Weinberg, W.C. Molecular Mechanisms of P63-Mediated Squamous Cancer Pathogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Campione, E.; Ventura, A.; Diluvio, L.; Mazzeo, M.; Mazzilli, S.; Garofalo, V.; Di Prete, M.; Bianchi, L. Current Developments in Pharmacotherapy for Actinic Keratosis. Expert. Opin. Pharmacother. 2018, 19, 1693–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Javor, S.; Gasparini, G.; Biatta, C.M.; Cozzani, E.; Cabiddu, F.; Ravetti, J.L.; Vellone, V.G.; Parodi, A. P53 Staining Index and Zonal Staining Patterns in Actinic Keratoses. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2021, 313, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Corbalán-Vélez, R.; Oviedo-Ramírez, I.; Ruiz-Maciá, J.A.; Conesa-Zamora, P.; Sánchez-Hernández, M.; Martínez-Barba, E.; Brufau-Redondo, C.; López-Lozano, J.M. Immunohistochemical Staining of P16 in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Genital and Extragenital Area. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2011, 102, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bakshi, A.; Shafi, R.; Nelson, J.; Cantrell, W.C.; Subhadarshani, S.; Andea, A.; Athar, M.; Elmets, C.A. The Clinical Course of Actinic Keratosis Correlates with Underlying Molecular Mechanisms. Br. J. Dermatol. 2020, 182, 995–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Azazmeh, N.; Assouline, B.; Winter, E.; Ruppo, S.; Nevo, Y.; Maly, A.; Meir, K.; Witkiewicz, A.K.; Cohen, J.; Rizou, S.V.; et al. Chronic Expression of P16INK4a in the Epidermis Induces Wnt-Mediated Hyperplasia and Promotes Tumor Initiation. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khodaeiani, E.; Fakhrjou, A.; Amirnia, M.; Babaei-Nezhad, S.; Taghvamanesh, F.; Razzagh-Karimi, E.; Alikhah, H. Immunohistochemical Evaluation of P53 and Ki67 Expression in Skin Epithelial Tumors. Indian J. Dermatol. 2013, 58, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Choi, W.J.; Youn, S.H.; Back, J.H.; Park, S.; Park, E.J.; Kim, K.J.; Park, H.R.; Kim, A.L.; Kim, K.H. The Role of KLF4 in UVB-Induced Murine Skin Tumor Development and Its Correlation with Cyclin D1, P53, and P21Waf1/Cip1 in Epithelial Tumors of the Human Skin. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2011, 303, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nys, K.; Agostinis, P. Bcl-2 Family Members: Essential Players in Skin Cancer. Cancer Lett. 2012, 320, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Neto Pimentel, D.R.; Alchorne, M.M.A.; Michalany, N.S.; Abreu, M.A.M.M.; Borra, R.C. Reduced P53 Staining in Actinic Keratosis Is Associated with Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Preliminary Study. Indian. J. Dermatol. 2013, 58, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Piipponen, M.; Riihilä, P.; Nissinen, L.; Kähäri, V.M. The Role of P53 in Progression of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers 2021, 13, 4507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bagazgoitia, L.; Cuevas, J.; Juarranz, Á. Expression of P53 and P16 in Actinic Keratosis, Bowenoid Actinic Keratosis and Bowen’s Disease. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2010, 24, 228–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sakiz, D.; Turkmenoglu, T.T.; Kabukcuoglu, F. The Expression of P63 and P53 in Keratoacanthoma and Intraepidermal and Invasive Neoplasms of the Skin. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2009, 205, 589–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Smirnov, A.; Anemona, L.; Novelli, F.; Piro, C.M.; Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli, M.; Melino, G.; Candi, E. P63 Is a Promising Marker in the Diagnosis of Unusual Skin Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Angadi, P.V.; Krishnapillai, R. Cyclin D1 Expression in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Verrucous Carcinoma: Correlation with Histological Differentiation. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontol. 2007, 103, e30–e35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Brasanac, D.; Stojkovic-Filipovic, J.; Bosic, M.; Tomanovic, N.; Manojlovic-Gacic, E. Expression of G1/S-Cyclins and Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors in Actinic Keratosis and Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2016, 43, 200–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. De Wispelaere, N.; Rico, S.D.; Bauer, M.; Luebke, A.M.; Kluth, M.; Büscheck, F.; Hube-Magg, C.; Höflmayer, D.; Gorbokon, N.; Weidemann, S.; et al. High Prevalence of P16 Staining in Malignant Tumors. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0262877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Saenz-Sardà, X.; Carrato, C.; Pérez-Roca, L.; Puig, L.; Ferrándiz, C.; Ariza, A.; Fernández-Figueras, M.T. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition contributes to invasion in squamous cell carcinomas originated from actinic keratosis through the differentiated pathway, whereas proliferation plays a more significant role in the classical pathway. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2018, 32, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hussein, M.R.; Ahmed, A.M. Expression Profile of CD10, BCL-2, P63, and EMA in the Normal Skin and Basal Cell Carcinomas: An Immunohistochemical Reappraisal. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2022, 113, 848–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Onder, S.; Erdem, H.; Haktanir, N.; Balta, H.; Celik, M. Assessment of BCL-2 Expression in Actinic Keratosis, Keratoacanthoma and Seborrheic Keratosis Cases. Ann. Med. Res. 2019, 26, 343–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abreu-Velez, A.M.; Brown, V.M.; Howard, M.S. Chapter 5. A Bullous Pemphigoid-like Allergic Drug Reaction, with Clues for differentiation versus Classic Bullous Pemphigoid. In Advances in Dermatology Research; Nova Science: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 57–66. ISBN 9781634843041. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee, D.Y.; Kim, B.R.; Yang, S.; Kim, M.; Yoon, T.Y.; Youn, S.W. Histopathological Predictor of the Progression from Actinic Keratosis to Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Quantitative Computer-Aided Image Analysis. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2021, 35, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Stuart, L.N. Stains & CD Markers CD31. Available online: https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/cdmarkerscd31.html (accessed on 1 August 2023).
  34. Daneluzzi, C.; Seyed Jafari, S.M.; Hunger, R.; Bossart, S. The Immunohistochemical Assessment of Neoangiogenesis Factors in Squamous Cell Carcinomas and Their Precursors in the Skin. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 4494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Dréno, B.; Cerio, R.; Dirschka, T.; Figueras Nart, I.; Lear, J.T.; Peris, K.; Ruiz de Casas, A.; Kaleci, S.; Pellacani, G. A Novel Actinic Keratosis Field Assessment Scale for Grading Actinic Keratosis Disease Severity. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2017, 97, 1108–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Schmitz, L.; Gambichler, T.; Gupta, G.; Stücker, M.; Stockfleth, E.; Szeimies, R.M.; Dirschka, T. Actinic Keratoses Show Variable Histological Basal Growth Patterns—A Proposed Classification Adjustment. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2018, 32, 745–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Van Der Pols, J.C.; Xu, C.; Boyle, G.M.; Parsons, P.G.; Whiteman, D.C.; Green, A.C. Expression of P53 Tumor Suppressor Protein in Sun-Exposed Skin and Associations with Sunscreen Use and Time Spent Outdoors: A Community-Based Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2006, 163, 982–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Subramaniam, P.; Olsen, C.M.; Thompson, B.S.; Whiteman, D.C.; Neale, R.E. Anatomical Distributions of Basal Cell Carcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Population-Based Study in Queensland, Australia. JAMA Dermatol. 2017, 153, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Nasiri, S.; Azhari, V.; Bidari-Zerehpoosh, F.; Asadi-Kani, Z.; Talebi, A. The Diagnostic Value of P63, P16, and P53 Immunohistochemistry in Distinguishing Seborrheic Keratosis, Actinic Keratosis, and Bowen’s Disease. Dermatol. Ther. 2021, 34, e14817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kohl, E.; Popp, C.; Zeman, F.; Unger, P.; Koller, M.; Landthaler, M.; Karrer, S.; Szeimies, R.-M. Photodynamic Therapy Using Intense Pulsed Light for Treating Actinic Keratoses and Photoaged Skin of the Dorsal Hands: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study. Br. J. Dermatol. 2017, 176, 352–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Madani, S.; Marwaha, S.; Dusendang, J.R.; Alexeeff, S.; Pham, N.; Chen, E.H.; Han, S.; Herrinton, L.J. Ten-Year Follow-up of Persons with Sun-Damaged Skin Associated with Subsequent Development of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. JAMA Dermatol. 2021, 157, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lee, D.W.; Kim, D.Y.; Hong, J.H.; Seo, S.H.; Kye, Y.C.; Ahn, H.H. Correlations between Histopathologic and Dermoscopic Findings in Korean Actinic Keratosis. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2019, 82, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia Life Expectancy in Latvia in 2021. Available online: https://stat.gov.lv/en/statistics-themes/population/population/5661-life-expectancy (accessed on 7 May 2023).
  44. Karagas, M.R.; Zens, M.S.; Nelson, H.H.; Mabuchi, K.; Perry, A.E.; Stukel, T.A.; Mott, L.A.; Andrew, A.S.; Applebaum, K.M.; Linet, M. Measures of Cumulative Exposure from a Standardized Sun Exposure History Questionnaire: A Comparison with Histologic Assessment of Solar Skin Damage. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2007, 165, 719–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Corbalán-Vélez, R.; Ruiz-Macia, J.A.; Brufau, C.; Oviedo-Ramírez, I.; Martínez-Barba, E.; López-Lozano, J.M.; Carapeto, F.J. Solar Elastosis in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2010, 101, 517–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Berhane, T.; Halliday, G.M.; Cooke, B.; Barnetson, R.S.C. Inflammation Is Associated with Progression of Actinic Keratoses to Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Humans. Br. J. Dermatol. 2002, 146, 810–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Piipponen, M.; Nissinen, L.; Riihilä, P.; Farshchian, M.; Kallajoki, M.; Peltonen, J.; Peltonen, S.; Kähäri, V.M. P53-Regulated Long Noncoding RNA PRECSIT Promotes Progression of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma via STAT3 Signaling. Am. J. Pathol. 2020, 190, 503–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Woo, Y.R.; Lim, J.H.; Jeong, S.W.; Cho, D.H.; Park, H.J. Analysis of Apoptosis-Associated Molecules Erythroid Differentiation Regulator 1, Bcl-2 and P53 in Actinic Keratosis after Treatment with Ingenol Mebutate. Exp. Dermatol. 2017, 26, 1012–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Singh, N.; Baby, D.; Rajguru, J.; Patil, P.; Thakkannavar, S.; Pujari, V. Inflammation and Cancer. Ann. Afr. Med. 2019, 18, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Farshchian, M.; Nissinen, L.; Siljamäki, E.; Riihilä, P.; Piipponen, M.; Kivisaari, A.; Kallajoki, M.; Grénman, R.; Peltonen, J.; Peltonen, S.; et al. Tumor Cell-Specific AIM2 Regulates Growth and Invasion of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 45825–45836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 12 07291 g001
Figure 1. Immunohistochemical expression of p53, p63, p16, and Cyclin D in actinic keratosis (A–D) and control (E–H) skin. Black arrows indicate strong positive cell staining. (A) expression of p53 in actinic keratosis (AK) with weak staining if any; (B) expression of p63 in AK, distribution above 2/3 of epidermal thickness; (C) expression of p16 in AK with 1–30% nuclear staining; (D) expression of Cyclin D in AK, distribution up to 2/3 of epidermal thickness; (E) expression of p53 in control skin (CS) with <5% nuclear staining; (F) expression of p63 in CS, distribution above 2/3 of epidermal thickness; (G) expression of p16 in CS with <1% nuclear staining; (H) expression of Cyclin D in CS, distribution up to 2/3 of epidermal thickness.
Figure 1. Immunohistochemical expression of p53, p63, p16, and Cyclin D in actinic keratosis (A–D) and control (E–H) skin. Black arrows indicate strong positive cell staining. (A) expression of p53 in actinic keratosis (AK) with weak staining if any; (B) expression of p63 in AK, distribution above 2/3 of epidermal thickness; (C) expression of p16 in AK with 1–30% nuclear staining; (D) expression of Cyclin D in AK, distribution up to 2/3 of epidermal thickness; (E) expression of p53 in control skin (CS) with <5% nuclear staining; (F) expression of p63 in CS, distribution above 2/3 of epidermal thickness; (G) expression of p16 in CS with <1% nuclear staining; (H) expression of Cyclin D in CS, distribution up to 2/3 of epidermal thickness.
Jcm 12 07291 g001
Jcm 12 07291 g002
Figure 2. Immunohistochemical expression of Ki67, Bcl-2, and CD31 in actinic keratosis (A–C) and control (D–F) skin; (A) expression of Ki67 in actinic keratosis (AK), distribution up to 2/3 of epidermal thickness; (B) expression of Bcl-2 in AK, distribution up to 2/3 of epidermal thickness, foci with pronounced subepidermal infiltration (red arrows); (C) expression of CD31 in AK, visible pronounced expression; (D) expression of Ki67 in control skin (CS), distribution of up to 1/3 of epidermal thickness; (E) expression of Bcl-2 in CS, distribution up to 2/3 of epidermal thickness, weak or none subepidermal infiltration; (F) expression of CD31 in CS, few visible positive capillaries. Black arrows indicate positive cell staining in the epidermis (A,B,D,E) and positive endothelial staining (C,F).
Figure 2. Immunohistochemical expression of Ki67, Bcl-2, and CD31 in actinic keratosis (A–C) and control (D–F) skin; (A) expression of Ki67 in actinic keratosis (AK), distribution up to 2/3 of epidermal thickness; (B) expression of Bcl-2 in AK, distribution up to 2/3 of epidermal thickness, foci with pronounced subepidermal infiltration (red arrows); (C) expression of CD31 in AK, visible pronounced expression; (D) expression of Ki67 in control skin (CS), distribution of up to 1/3 of epidermal thickness; (E) expression of Bcl-2 in CS, distribution up to 2/3 of epidermal thickness, weak or none subepidermal infiltration; (F) expression of CD31 in CS, few visible positive capillaries. Black arrows indicate positive cell staining in the epidermis (A,B,D,E) and positive endothelial staining (C,F).
Jcm 12 07291 g002
Table 1. List of antibodies and detection methods used in the study.
Table 1. List of antibodies and detection methods used in the study.
AntibodyCloneDilutionIncubation TimeSource
p53Do-7Ready-to-use30 minDAKO
p63A4AReady-to-use20 minVentana
p16E6H4Ready-to-use20 minVentana
Ki67MIB1Ready-to-use16 minDAKO
Cyclin DEP12Ready-to-use30 minDAKO
Bcl-2124Ready-to-use30 minDAKO
CD31JC70AReady-to-use30 minDAKO
Table 2. Distribution of histopathological and immunohistochemical signs of biopsied lesions.
Table 2. Distribution of histopathological and immunohistochemical signs of biopsied lesions.
Cases, Total (%)Controls, Total (%)p Value
Total number of cases included29 (100%)8 (100%)
Mean age (±SD)78.1 (±5.8) years73.8 (±6.3) yearsp = 0.076
Gender:
 Males7 (24.1%)3 (37.5%)p = 0.655
 Females22 (75.9%)5 (62.5%)
Extent of atypical keratinocytes in the epidermis [4]
 No atypical keratinocytes0 (0%)8 (100%)p < 0.001 *
 In the lower 1/34 (13.8%)0 (0%)
 Up to lower 2/314 (48.3%)0 (0%)
 Above 2/34 (13.8%)0 (0%)
 Full thickness7 (24.1%)0 (0%)
Protruding [36]
 None5 (17.2%)8 (100%)p < 0.001 *
 Crowding (pro I)7 (24.1%)0 (0%)
 Budding (pro II)3 (10.3%)0 (0%)
 Papillary sprouting (pro III)14 (48.3%)0 (0%)
Presence of amorphic masses21 (72.4%)0 (0%)p < 0.001 *
p16 semiquantitative expression
 <1%13 (44.8%)4 (50%)p = 0.865
 1–30%10 (34.5%)4 (50%)
 30–50%3 (10.3%)0 (0%)
 >50%3 (10.3%)0 (0%)
p16 distribution
 Negative13 (44.8%)4 (50%)p = 1.0
 Patchy13 (44.8%)4 (50%)
 Patchy/Diffuse3 (10.3%)0 (0%)
p53 semiquantitative expression
 Weak staining (if any)5 (17.2%)1 (12.5%)p = 0.740
 <5%2 (6.9%)0 (0%)
 5–50%11 (37.9%)5 (62.5%)
 >50%11 (37.9%)2 (25.0%)
p53 distribution in the epidermis
 No expression6 (20.7%)1 (12.5%)p = 0.885
 In the lower 1/39 (31.0%)3 (37.5%)
 Up to lower 2/34 (13.8%)2 (25.0%)
 Above 2/39 (31.0%)2 (25.0%)
 Full thickness1 (3.4%)0 (0%)
p53 staining intensity
 No staining6 (20.7%)0 (0%)p = 0.036 *
 Weak staining10 (34.5%)7 (87.5%)
 Strong staining13 (44.8%)1 (12.5%)
p63 distribution in the epidermis
 Up to lower 2/35 (17.2%)1 (12.5%)p = 1.0
 Above 2/323 (79.3%)7 (87.5%)
 Full thickness1 (3.4%)0 (0%)
Cyclin D distribution in the epidermis
 In the lower 1/311 (37.9%)0 (0%)p = 0.075
 Up to lower 2/314 (48.3%)7 (87.5%)
 Above 2/34 (13.8%)1 (12.5%)
Ki67 distribution in the epidermis
 In the lower 1/314 (48.3%)7 (87.5%)p = 0.398
 Up to lower 2/311 (37.9%)1 (12.5%)
 Above 2/32 (6.9%)0 (0%)
 Full thickness2 (6.9%)0 (0%)
Bcl-2 distribution in the epidermis
 No expression16 (55.2%)0 (0%)p = 0.014 *
 In the lower 1/38 (27.6%)5 (62.5%)
 Up to lower 2/34 (13.8%)2 (25.0%)
 Above 2/31 (3.4%)1 (12.5%)
Bcl-2 semiquantitative expression in the epidermis
 No or almost no cells16 (55.2%)0 (0%)p = 0.015 *
 Weak (<10%)6 (20.7%)4 (50.0%)
 Moderately positive (10–25%)3 (10.3%)2 (25.0%)
 Highly positive (>25%)4 (13.8%)2 (25.0%)
Bcl-2 subepidermal infiltration
 Weak or none2 (6.9%)7 (87.5%)p < 0.001 *
 Foci with more pronounced22 (75.9%)1 (12.5%)
 Foci with very pronounced5 (17.2%)0 (0%)
CD31 expression in dermal capillaries
 Up to 20 positive capillaries at 20× magnification1 (3.4%)2 (25.0%)p = 0.174
 20–40 positive capillaries at 20× magnification19 (65.5%)5 (62.5%)
 Above 40 positive capillaries at 20× magnification9 (31.0%)1 (12.5%)
CD31 semiquantitative dermal expression
 Separate scattered positive vessels2 (6.9%)3 (37.5%)p = 0.011 *
 Foci with moderately pronounced expression8 (27.6%)5 (62.5%)
 Foci with pronounced expression12 (54.5%)0 (0%)
* p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Balcere, A.; Sperga, M.; Čēma, I.; Lauskis, G.; Zolovs, M.; Rone Kupfere, M.; Krūmiņa, A. Expression of p53, p63, p16, Ki67, Cyclin D, Bcl-2, and CD31 Markers in Actinic Keratosis, In Situ Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Normal Sun-Exposed Skin of Elderly Patients. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 7291. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237291

AMA Style

Balcere A, Sperga M, Čēma I, Lauskis G, Zolovs M, Rone Kupfere M, Krūmiņa A. Expression of p53, p63, p16, Ki67, Cyclin D, Bcl-2, and CD31 Markers in Actinic Keratosis, In Situ Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Normal Sun-Exposed Skin of Elderly Patients. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(23):7291. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237291

Chicago/Turabian Style

Balcere, Alise, Māris Sperga, Ingrīda Čēma, Gunārs Lauskis, Maksims Zolovs, Māra Rone Kupfere, and Angelika Krūmiņa. 2023. "Expression of p53, p63, p16, Ki67, Cyclin D, Bcl-2, and CD31 Markers in Actinic Keratosis, In Situ Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Normal Sun-Exposed Skin of Elderly Patients" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 23: 7291. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237291

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop