Next Article in Journal
Habituation to Pain in Patients with Chronic Pain: Clinical Implications and Future Directions
Next Article in Special Issue
Current Management and Treatment Paradigms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease following Sleeve Gastrectomy
Previous Article in Journal
Comment on Torrellas et al. Effectiveness, Safety and Choroidal Changes of a Fovea-Sparing Technique for the Treatment of Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy with Yellow Subthreshold Laser. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1127
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Verification of Safety and Efficacy of Sleeve Gastrectomy Based on National Registry by Japanese Society for Treatment of Obesity

1
Japanese Society for Treatment of Obesity, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
2
Department of Surgery, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, 564-1, Shimoshizu, Sakura 285-8741, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(13), 4303; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134303
Submission received: 29 May 2023 / Revised: 17 June 2023 / Accepted: 22 June 2023 / Published: 27 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sleeve Gastrectomy: Risks, Outcomes, and Complications)

Abstract

:
In Japan, bariatric surgical treatment was started in 1982. The Japanese Society for Treatment of Obesity (JSTO) was established in 2007, and then, JSTO started the national registry of bariatric surgery cases and multidisciplinary educational program. A total of 44 facilities registered 4055 bariatric surgical cases until 2021. In this study, the purpose is to clarify the indication, the safety and the effectiveness of the sleeve gastrectomy using national registry database compiled by JSTO. Preoperative BMI ranged from 27.6 to 90.7 kg/m2, and the mean value was 42.7. With regard to gender, men/women was 1/1.3. Age was 42.2 as mean. As preoperative comorbidities, DM ratio was 54.4% of the patients, hypertension 64.5%, dyslipidemia 65.1%, and sleep apnea syndrome 69.8%. As an operation method, laparoscopic method was conducted in 99.7% of the cases. The intraoperative incidence rate was 0.9%. Conversion rate to open method was 1.1%. Postoperative morbidity ratio was 5.6%, and mortality was 0%. Reoperations were performed in 1.5% of the cases. Postoperative hospital stay was 5 days in median value. Body weight loss was 27.6 kg in the mean value after follow-up days of 279 ± 245. As the effect on the preoperative metabolic comorbidities, DM has improved in 82.9% of the cases, hypertension 67.9% and dyslipidemia 66.6%. In conclusion, using JSTO database, we evaluated the indication, postoperative complications and weight loss effect of sleeve gastrectomy in Japan. Regarding the evaluation of the effect on preoperative comorbidities, future follow-up based on more detailed criteria was considered to be necessary.

1. Introduction

Surgical treatment for obesity began in the 1950s. Sleeve gastrectomy, which was developed in the 2000s, has become popular worldwide with the progress of laparoscopic surgery and is currently the most performed bariatric surgical procedure [1]. In this surgery, the weight loss effect and the metabolic improvement effect are remarkably observed. Therefore, this surgery has been re-recognized as a metabolic surgery, and the number of surgical cases is increasing [2,3]. The low invasiveness, weight loss effect and metabolic improvement effect of this procedure have been highly evaluated, and research on the factors that influence the effect has progressed [4,5,6]. On the other hand, with the spread of this technique, it is important to perform it safely for short-term and long-term results. A management system is in place for this purpose. In the U.S., ACS (American College of Surgeons) and ASMBS (American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery) have their own education and certification systems to ensure safety [7,8]. In Japan, bariatric surgical treatment was started in 1982. The first case was performed using open method. After that, the Japanese Society for Treatment of Obesity (JSTO) was established in 2007 due to an increase in diabetes and an increase in the trend toward obesity among adult men, and then, JSTO started national registry of bariatric surgery cases and multidisciplinary educational program in order to facilitate surgical treatment of obesity in Japan (Table 1).
The national registry database by JSTO aims to ensure safety and efficacy in order to facilitate increased utilization of bariatric surgery. The database committee decided input items at the time of its start, and the analyzed results were shared with the board of directors and the society members through annual reports published at each academic society. Before the establishment of JSTO, total cases were 186, and half of them were performed using open method. After the establishment of JSTO, the numbers were increasing and reached 4055 in total in 2021 (Figure 1). Most operation methods were performed laparoscopically. Additionally, recently sleeve gastrectomy was indicated for many cases according to the prevalence of laparoscopic method. In Japan, for obesity surgery, only sleeve gastrectomy was allowed for insurance medical treatment. If the main purpose was to treat diabetes, bypass surgery was often recommended to the patient, but in this case, it would be self-financed. In Japan, before 2008, half were gastric bypass and the other half were banding method and sleeve gastrectomy. After 2008, sleeve gastrectomy was mostly performed in 3240 cases (83.7%), and the next was sleeve bypass method [9] (Figure 2). Under such background, in this study, we verified the safety and efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy in Japan based on national registration by JSTO.

2. Subjects and Methods

2.1. JSTO Database and Subjects

The study was based on the database registered by JSTO. Each member facility of JSTO was issued an ID and password. The database includes gender, age, weight, BMI, comorbidities (including diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, sleep apnea and other complications), treatment efficacy rate, date, surgical technique, laparoscopy, change to open surgery, reoperation, surgical complications, postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay period, postoperative follow-up period, weight loss (kg), diabetes improvement, hypertension improvement and dyslipidemia improvement for each registered patient. To avoid complication for registration at each facility, it emphasizes on the ease of entering input terms. The registrations were uploaded after surgery at arbitrary timing. Therefore, follow-up period was up to 1 year at most registered institutions. Determination of treatment response was based on weight loss and improvement in comorbidities at enrollment, and specific criteria were entrusted to each site to simplify the process. Physician standards and facility standards were considered as ethical guidelines in accordance with health insurance medical fees or clinical research. The data were anonymized by each facility. Authors were members of the database committee of JSTO and directly parsed the database. In this study, the aim is to clarify the indication, the safety and the effectiveness of the sleeve gastrectomy using national registry database compiled by JSTO. The number of the subjects were 3240. The period of the surgery was from 2008 to 2021.

2.2. Methods

Indications of surgery, the safety of the surgery and the outcome of bariatric and metabolic effects were evaluated. The evaluated factors were preoperative BMI, age, gender proportion and coexisting comorbidities as indications of surgery. BMI and age were estimated by mean ± SD. Preoperative comorbidities input was either of the presence or the absence, so that they were evaluated by the positive rate (%). As the safety of the surgery, laparoscopic procedure, change to open surgery, reoperation, surgical complications and postoperative complications were estimated by positive rate (%). Additionally, postoperative hospital stay period was evaluated by median value. As the outcome of bariatric effects, body weight loss (kg) and the postoperative follow-up period were evaluated by mean ± SD. As the outcome of metabolic effect, diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia were evaluated. Postoperative improvements were input as the presence or the absence, and they were evaluated by the positive rate (%).

3. Results

3.1. Indications of Surgery

Indications of surgery were determined according to the JSTO statement, IFSO-APC standards or Japanese insurance medical treatment requirements. The evaluated factors were preoperative BMI, age, gender and the coexisting morbidities. Preoperative BMI was 27.6 to 90.7 kg/m2 (mean ± SD 42.7 ± 8.0) (Figure 3).
As gender, men were 1385 (42.7%), and women were 1855 (57.3%). Age was 42.2 ± 10.4 (mean ± SD) (M 42.5 ± 9.5, F 42.5 ± 11.1). As preoperative comorbidities, the combined ratio of DM was 54.4%, hypertension 64.5%, dyslipidemia 65.1% and sleep apnea syndrome (SAS) 69.8%.

3.2. Evaluation of the Safety of the Surgery

As an operation method, laparoscopic methods were performed in 99.7% of the cases. The intraoperative incidence rate was 0.9% which included difficulties (n = 4; 0.12%), organ injury (n = 11; 0.34%), bleeding (n = 6; 0.19%), staple trouble (n = 2; 0.06%), hypercapnia (n = 2; 0.06%) and others (n = 4; 0.12%). Conversion rate to open from laparoscopic methods was 1.1%. As postoperative complications, bleeding (n = 57; 1.76%), SSI (n = 19; 0.59%), pneumonia (n = 18; 0.56%), stenosis (n = 17; 0.52%), anastomotic leakage (n = 10; 0.31%), mental disorder (n = 7; 0.21%), GERD (n = 6; 0.19%), infection (n = 6; 0.19%), heart disease (n = 5; 0.15%), thrombosis (n = 5; 0.15%), liver dysfunction (n = 4; 0.12%), rhabdomyolysis (n = 3; 0.09%), renal failure (n = 3; 0.09%), dehydration (n = 3; 0.09%) and others (n = 20; 0.62%) were registered. Reoperations were performed in 1.5% of the cases due to bleeding (n = 22; 0.68%), anastomotic leakage (n = 5; 0.15%), stenosis (n = 3; 0.09%), abscess (n = 1; 0.03%) and others (n = 17; 0.52%). Postoperative complication rate was 5.6% in total, and mortality was 0%. Postoperative hospital stay was 5 days as the median value.

3.3. Evaluation of the Outcome of Bariatric and Metabolic Effects

Body weight loss was 27.6 ± 15.5 (mean ± SD) kg in the follow-up days of 279 ± 245 after surgery.
As the effect on the preoperative metabolic comorbidities, DM improved in 82.9% of the cases, hypertension in 67.9% and dyslipidemia in 66.6% after 279 ± 245 days after surgery.

4. Discussion

The obese population (BMI > 30) in Japan is about 3%, which is one of the lowest in the world [10]. On the other hand, the diabetic population is on the rise in Japan [11], and the relationship between obesity and diabetes has also been reported [12]. In particular, Asians are said to be underweight and prone to diabetes compared to Westerners [13]. In the 2000s, the metabolic improvement effect of bariatric surgery was recognized, and it came to be called ‘metabolic surgery’ [14]. In particular, it is highly effective in improving diabetes, and its indications have been determined by academic societies worldwide [15,16,17]. A lower BMI indication has been shown for Asians [18].
In Japan, JSTO was established in 2008 with the aim of safe increase in surgery while feeling the need to expand bariatric surgical treatment. Under the leadership of the society, we have promoted the guideline that created the surgical case registration, the multi-professional education program and the facility certification business. As of 2008, there were less than 200 surgical cases, which rapidly increased thereafter, reaching over 4000 cases in 2021 after being covered by health insurance in 2014. In JSTO, we have reported safety and efficacy of surgical cases at each annual meeting, and both have shown good results and have been improving year by year. In the present analysis, the intraoperative incident rate was 0.9%, and the postoperative complication rate was 5.6%. The reoperation rate was 1.5%, and there were no deaths, and it was considered that the surgical treatments were performed safely. The operative safety were feasible compared to previous reports, which showed 6.5–14% postoperative morbidities [19,20]. The median postoperative hospital stay was 5 days. In Japan, in order to confirm safety, there were many facilities where patients were discharged from the hospital in 3 to 5 days even if the surgery went smoothly. In the future, it is expected to be shorten.
Looking at the improvement in the follow-up days of 279 ± 245 after surgery, weight loss effect 27.6 ± 15.5 kg and the improvement of comorbidities was observed in the majority of patients, with diabetes mellitus 82.9%, hypertension 67.9% and dyslipidemia 66.6%. The effect was prominent in diabetes. The efficacy in long-term outcomes has also been reported by multiple institutions [21,22,23]. As described above, the indication and outcome of sleeve gastrectomy has been shown and verified that it is safely administered in Japan, which is located in East Asia and is prone to suffering from diabetes. The laparoscopy rate was 99.7%, and the conversion to open rate was 1.1%. Minimally invasive procedures are thought to contribute to safety. On the other hand, the registry by JSTO were uploaded after surgery at arbitrary timing. Therefore, follow-up period was up to 1 year at most registered institutions. Therefore, there was some range in the registered bariatric and metabolic effects of cases according to the timing of registration. In addition, preoperative comorbidity input was either of the presence or the absence, and postoperative improvement was also input of the presence or the absence. Improvement indicators were based on the criteria of each facility; therefore, there were limitations in the detailed analysis of this study. In the registry, the characteristic postoperative complications of sleeve gastrectomy, such as a stump of suture failure, twisting, stenosis and reflux esophagitis, have also been registered. It is considered necessary to devise ways to avoid these problems and to further consider treatments to be taken at the time of onset. In addition, multi-disciplinary education [24], facility certification, surgical case registration, and verification of safety effectiveness are considered important, and we would like to continue them in the future. Additionally, in this study, there were some limitations due to which it was considered impossible to construct a specific predictive index. As a future task, we considered the direction of building a follow-up registry system.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, using JSTO database, we evaluated the indication, postoperative complications and weight loss effect of sleeve gastrectomy in Japan. Regarding the evaluation or prediction of the effect on preoperative comorbidities, future follow-up analysis based on more detailed criteria is considered to be necessary.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.O. and I.T.; methodology, S.O.; validation, S.O. and T.O.; formal analysis, S.O.; investigation, S.O. and T.O.; re-sources, S.O., T.O., A.S. and H.M.; data curation, I.T.; writing—original draft preparation, S.O.; writing—review and editing, S.O.; visualization, S.O.; supervision, S.O.; project administration, S.O. and T.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Statements regarding ethics and consent were obtained from the Ethics Committee of JSTO (IRB #2022-03). All procedures involving human participants were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the ethical committee of JSTO and the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments of comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Our data used in this study is available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the office of JSTO for their supervision.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Angrisani, L.; Santonicola, A.; Iovino, P.; Formisano, G.; Buchwald, H.; Scopinaro, N. Bariatric Surgery Worldwide 2013. Obes. Surg. 2015, 25, 1822–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rubino, F.; Shukla, A.; Pomp, A.; Moreira, M.; Ahn, S.M.; Dakin, G. Bariatric, metabolic, and diabetes surgery: What’s in a name? Ann. Surg. 2014, 59, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Brown, W.A.; Kow, L.; Shikora, S.; Liem, R.; Welbourn, R.; Dixon, J. 6th IFSO Global Registry Report 2021; Dendrite Clinical Systems Ltd.: Berkshire, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chambers, A.P.; Kirchner, H.; Wilson-Perez, H.E.; Willency, J.A.; Hale, J.E.; Gaylinn, B.D. The effects of vertical sleeve gastrectomy in rodents are ghrelin independent. Gastroenterology 2013, 144, 50–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Myronovych, A.; Kirby, M.; Ryan, K.K.; Zhang, W.; Jha, P.; Setchell, K.D.; Dexheimer, P.J.; Aronow, B.; Seeley, R.J.; Kohli, R. Vertical sleeve gastrectomy reduces hepatic steatosis while increasing serum bile acids in a weight-loss-independent manner. Obesity 2014, 22, 390–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ruiz-Tovar, J.; Zubiaga, L.; Llavero, C.; Diez, M.; Arroyo, A.; Calpena, R. Serum cholesterol by morbidly obese patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in additional physical activity. Obes. Surg. 2014, 24, 385–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nguyen, N.T.; Root, J.; Zainabadi, K.; Sabio, A.; Chalifoux, S.; Stevens, C.M.; Mavandadi, S.; Longoria, M.; Wilson, S.E. Accelerated growth of bariatric surgery with the introduction of minimally invasive surgery. Arch. Surg. 2005, 140, 1198–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Demaria, E.J.; Winegar, D.A.; Pate, V.W.; Hutcher, N.E.; Ponce, J.; Pories, W.J. Early postoperative outcomes of metabolic surgery to treat diabetes from sites participating in the ASMBS bariatric surgery center of excellence program as reported in the Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database. Ann. Surg. 2010, 252, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kasama, K.; Tagaya, N.; Kanehira, E.; Oshiro, T.; Seki, Y.; Kinouchi, M.; Umezawa, A.; Negishi, Y.; Kurokawa, Y. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with duodenojejunal bypass: Technique and preliminary results. Obes. Surg. 2009, 9, 1341–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yoshiike, N.; Miyoshi, M. Epidemiological aspects of overweight and obesity in Japan-international comparisons. Nihon Rinsho. 2013, 71, 207–216. [Google Scholar]
  11. Goto, A.; Goto, M.; Noda, M.; Tsugane, S. Incidence of type 2 diabetes in Japan: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2013, 6, e74699. [Google Scholar]
  12. Malone, J.I.; Hansen, B.C. Does obesity cause type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)? Or is it the opposite? Pediatr. Diabetes 2019, 20, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Weber, M.B.; Oza-Frank, R.; Staimez, L.R.; Ali, M.K.; Narayan, K.M. Type 2 diabetes in Asians: Prevalence, risk factors, and effectiveness of behavioral intervention at individual and population levels. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2012, 32, 417–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rubino, F.; R’bibo, S.L.; del Genio, F.; Mazumdar, M.; McGraw, T.E. Metabolic surgery: The role of the gastrointestinal tract in diabetes mellitus. Nat. Rev. Endocrionol. 2010, 6, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Rubino, F.; Kaplan, L.M.; Schauer, P.R.; Cummings, D.E. The diabetes Surgery Summit consensus conference recommendations for the evaluation and use of gastrointestinal surgery to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann. Surg. 2010, 251, 399–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dixon, J.B.; Zimmet, P.; Alberti, K.G.; Rubino, F. Bariatric surgery: An IDF statement for obese Type 2 diabetes. Diabet. Med. 2011, 28, 628–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2015. Diabetes Care 2015, 33 (Suppl. 46–48), 97–111. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kasama, K.; Mui, W.; Lee, W.J.; Lakdawala, M.; Naitoh, T.; Seki, Y.; Sasaki, A.; Wakabayashi, G.; Sasaki, I.; Kawamura, I.; et al. IFSO-APC Consensus Statement 2011. Obes. Surg. 2012, 22, 677–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Castro, V.; Saravia, B.; Loureiro, G.; Leturio, F.; García, F.; Moro, D.; Barrenetxea, A.; Díez, D.V. Sleeve gastrectomy as a surgical technique in bariatric surgery: Results of safety and effectiveness. Cir. Esp. 2022, 100, 88–94. [Google Scholar]
  20. Creange, C.; Sethi, M.; Fielding, G.; Fielding, C.R. The safety of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy among diabetic patients. Surg. Endosc. 2017, 31, 907–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Seki, Y.; Kasama, K.; Hashimoto, K. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese Japanese patients. Obes. Surg. 2016, 26, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Haruta, H.; Kasama, K.; Ohta, M.; Sasaki, A.; Yamamoto, H.; Miyazaki, Y.; Oshiro, T.; Naitoh, T.; Hosoya, Y.; Togawa, T.; et al. Long-term outcomes of bariatric and metabolic surgery in Japan:Results of multi-institutional survey. Obes. Surg. 2017, 27, 754–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Saiki, A.; Yamaguchi, T.; Tanaka, S.; Sasaki, A.; Naitoh, T.; Seto, Y.; Matsubara, H.; Yokote, K.; Okazumi, S. Background characteristics and postoperative outcomes of insufficient weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Japanese patients. Ann. Gastroenterol. Surg. 2019, 26, 638–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Montesi, L.; El Ghoch, M.; Brodosi, L.; Calugi, S.; Marchesini, G.; Dalle Grave, R. Long-term weight loss maintenance for Obesity: A multidisciplinary approach. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2016, 26, 37–46. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Bariatric surgery cases in Japan. National registry of the bariatric surgery by 44 facilities including 4055 cases: 1982–2007 (n = 186) and 2008–Dec. 2021 (n = 3869).
Figure 1. Bariatric surgery cases in Japan. National registry of the bariatric surgery by 44 facilities including 4055 cases: 1982–2007 (n = 186) and 2008–Dec. 2021 (n = 3869).
Jcm 12 04303 g001
Figure 2. Operation methods (44 facilities; 4055 cases) in Japan. After 2008, sleeve gastrectomy was mostly performed in 3240 cases (83.7%).
Figure 2. Operation methods (44 facilities; 4055 cases) in Japan. After 2008, sleeve gastrectomy was mostly performed in 3240 cases (83.7%).
Jcm 12 04303 g002
Figure 3. Preoperative patient’s body mass indices. The value data ranged from 27.6 to 90.7 kg/m2 (mean ± SD:42.7 ± 8.0).
Figure 3. Preoperative patient’s body mass indices. The value data ranged from 27.6 to 90.7 kg/m2 (mean ± SD:42.7 ± 8.0).
Jcm 12 04303 g003
Table 1. The activities of Japanese Society for Treatment of Obesity (JSTO).
Table 1. The activities of Japanese Society for Treatment of Obesity (JSTO).
2007Establishment of Japanese Society for Treatment of Obesity (JSTO)
20081st general meeting of JSTO
2010Statement for safe and excellent bariatric surgery
2012Start of national registry of bariatric surgery
2013Guideline for safe and excellent bariatric surgery in Japan
2014Sleeve gastrectomy in national health insurance system
2016Publishing of handbook of metabolic surgery
2021Total registration of bariatric surgery over 4000 cases
2022Consensus statement on the bariatric and metabolic surgery for Japanese patients
with severe obesity with T2DM
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Okazumi, S.; Oshiro, T.; Sasaki, A.; Matsubara, H.; Tatsuno, I. Verification of Safety and Efficacy of Sleeve Gastrectomy Based on National Registry by Japanese Society for Treatment of Obesity. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 4303. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134303

AMA Style

Okazumi S, Oshiro T, Sasaki A, Matsubara H, Tatsuno I. Verification of Safety and Efficacy of Sleeve Gastrectomy Based on National Registry by Japanese Society for Treatment of Obesity. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(13):4303. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134303

Chicago/Turabian Style

Okazumi, Shinichi, Takashi Oshiro, Akira Sasaki, Hisahiro Matsubara, and Ichiro Tatsuno. 2023. "Verification of Safety and Efficacy of Sleeve Gastrectomy Based on National Registry by Japanese Society for Treatment of Obesity" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 13: 4303. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134303

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop