Next Article in Journal
MRI Findings in Hip in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Next Article in Special Issue
Pathologic Complete Response in Urothelial Carcinoma Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Standalone Flow Diversion Therapy Effectively Controls Rebleeding of Acutely Ruptured Internal Carotid Artery Trunk (Nonbranching) Microaneurysms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Cancer Immunotherapy: Current and Future Perspectives on a Therapeutic Revolution

1
Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni-15, 40121 Bologna, Italy
2
Medical Oncology Unit, Macerata General Hospital, 62100 Macerata, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(22), 5246; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225246
Submission received: 31 October 2021 / Accepted: 10 November 2021 / Published: 11 November 2021
The advent of immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape of several hematological and solid tumors [1,2], and the number of patients eligible for immune-based cancer therapies continues to rise as these treatments are currently part of the first- or later-line standards for many malignancies [3,4,5]. Over the past decade, an impressive number of trials have been conducted on the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors, with the results of these studies paving the way towards the Immunotherapy Era in cancer care [6,7]. The first immune checkpoint inhibitor approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was ipilimumab, approved in 2011 for the treatment of advanced melanoma, following the results of the pivotal phase III trial conducted by Hodi and colleagues [8,9]. More than ten years after the publication of this study, there is a plethora of ongoing trials aiming to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors, as a monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer agents [10,11]; thus, the number of cancer patients receiving immunotherapy is expected to further increase in the near future, especially considering that a wide range of combination therapies is being explored, with the aim of producing a synergistic effect [12,13].
For example, the treatment scenario of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has recently undergone a revolution following the results of landmark phase III clinical trials on immune checkpoint inhibitor–tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations [14,15], such as pembrolizumab plus axitinib, nivolumab plus cabozantinib, pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib [16,17], as well as dual checkpoint bloackade with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in intermediate–poor-risk patients [18,19]. These treatments currently represent novel standards of treatment, as is recommended by the most up-to-date international guidelines [20,21].
However, several important issues have yet to be addressed in cancer immunotherapy. Among these, the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is considerably limited in some “immunologically cold” tumors (pancreatic adenocarcinoma, prostate cancer, biliary tract cancer, etc.), in which immunotherapy is still trying to find its therapeutic niche [22,23,24,25]. Moreover, and among the main challenges, the lack of predictive biomarkers that are able to guide therapeutic choices in several malignancies represents another important unmet need in this setting [26,27,28]. Several potentially useful predictors have been evaluated and are under assessment including, among others, PD-L1 expression, TMB, MSI, TILs and the gut microbiome [29,30,31].
This Special Issue aims to highlight key open questions and future perspectives in modern cancer immunotherapy, including novel immune checkpoint inhibitors and immune-based combinations, mechanisms of action (Figure 1), potential biomarkers predictive of response, experimental treatments, and other timely and emergent topics. International experts in this field will examine key approaches that are under active investigation in clinical and preclinical research, presenting critical analyses and integrating their own perspectives on promising drugs in clinical trials and the latest therapeutic strategies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, all authors; methodology, all authors; software, all authors; validation, all authors; formal analysis, all authors; investigation, all authors; resources, all authors; data curation, all authors; writing—original draft preparation, all authors; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, all authors; supervision, all authors; project administration, all authors; funding acquisition, all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Reck, M.; Rodríguez–Abreu, D.; Robinson, A.G.; Hui, R.; Csőszi, T.; Fülöp, A.; Gottfried, M.; Peled, N.; Tafreshi, A.; Cuffe, S.; et al. Updated Analysis of KEYNOTE-024: Pembrolizumab Versus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer With PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score of 50% or Greater. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Powles, T.; Walker, J.; Williams, J.A.; Bellmunt, J. The evolving role of PD-L1 testing in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2020, 82, 101925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Massari, F.; Rizzo, A.; Mollica, V.; Rosellini, M.; Marchetti, A.; Ardizzoni, A.; Santoni, M. Immune-based combinations for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Eur. J. Cancer 2021, 154, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Motzer, R.J.; Tannir, N.M.; McDermott, D.F.; Frontera, O.A.; Melichar, B.; Choueiri, T.K.; Plimack, E.R.; Barthélémy, P.; Porta, C.; George, S.; et al. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 1277–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lemery, S.; Keegan, P.; Pazdur, R. First FDA Approval Agnostic of Cancer Site—When a Biomarker Defines the Indication. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 1409–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. De Miguel, M.; Calvo, E. Clinical Challenges of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Cancer Cell 2020, 38, 326–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, Y. Cancer immunotherapy: Harnessing the immune system to battle cancer. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 3335–3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hodi, F.S.; O’Day, S.J.; McDermott, D.F.; Weber, R.W.; Sosman, J.A.; Haanen, J.B.; Gonzalez, R.; Robert, C.; Schadendorf, D.; Hassel, J.C.; et al. Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 711–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hwu, P. Treating cancer by targeting the immune system. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 779–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hunter, K.A.; Socinski, M.A.; Villaruz, L.C. PD-L1 Testing in Guiding Patient Selection for PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor Therapy in Lung Cancer. Mol. Diagn. Ther. 2018, 22, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yarchoan, M.; Hopkins, A.; Jaffee, E.M. Tumor Mutational Burden and Response Rate to PD-1 Inhibition. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 2500–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bergerot, P.; Lamb, P.; Wang, E.; Pal, S.K. Cabozantinib in Combination with Immunotherapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma and Urothelial Carcinoma: Rationale and Clinical Evidence. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2019, 18, 2185–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Cheng, A.-L.; Hsu, C.; Chan, S.L.; Choo, S.-P.; Kudo, M. Challenges of combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors for hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2020, 72, 307–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Motzer, R.J.; Rini, B.I.; McDermott, D.F.; Frontera, O.A.; Hammers, H.J.; Carducci, M.A.; Salman, P.; Escudier, B.; Beuselinck, B.; Amin, A.; et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: Extended follow-up of efficacy and safety results from a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019, 20, 1370–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rini, B.I.; Plimack, E.R.; Stus, V.; Gafanov, R.; Hawkins, R.; Nosov, D.; Pouliot, F.; Alekseev, B.; Soulières, D.; Melichar, B.; et al. Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 1116–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Massari, F.; Mollica, V.; Rizzo, A.; Cosmai, L.; Rizzo, M.; Porta, C. Safety evaluation of immune-based combinations in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2020, 19, 1329–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sheng, I.Y.; Rini, B.I. Immunotherapy for renal cell carcinoma. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2019, 19, 897–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Dizman, N.; Arslan, Z.E.; Feng, M.; Pal, S.K. Sequencing Therapies for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Urol. Clin. N. Am. 2020, 47, 305–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gao, X.; McDermott, D.F. Ipilimumab in combination with nivolumab for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2018, 18, 947–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Powles, T.; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: [email protected]. Recent eUpdate to the ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines on renal cell carcinoma on cabozantinib and nivolumab for first-line clear cell renal cancer: Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2021, 32, 422–423. [Google Scholar]
  21. Thana, M.; Wood, L.A. What Do International Guidelines Say About First-line Therapy for Clear-cell Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma? Eur. Urol. Focus 2020, 6, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Piha-Paul, S.A.; Oh, D.; Ueno, M.; Malka, D.; Chung, H.C.; Nagrial, A.; Kelley, R.K.; Ros, W.; Italiano, A.; Nakagawa, K.; et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab for the treatment of advanced biliary cancer: Results from the KEYNOTE -158 and KEYNOTE-028 studies. Int. J. Cancer 2020, 147, 2190–2198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rizzo, A.; Mollica, V.; Cimadamore, A.; Santoni, M.; Scarpelli, M.; Giunchi, F.; Cheng, L.; Lopez-Beltran, A.; Fiorentino, M.; Montironi, R.; et al. Is There a Role for Immunotherapy in Prostate Cancer? Cells 2020, 9, 2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sunami, Y.; Kleeff, J. Immunotherapy of pancreatic cancer. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2019, 164, 189–216. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Santoni, M.; Conti, A.; Piva, F.; Massari, F.; Ciccarese, C.; Burattini, L.; Cheng, L.; Lopez-Beltran, A.; Scarpelli, M.; Santini, D.; et al. Role of STAT3 pathway in genitourinary tumors. Futur. Sci. OA 2015, 1, FSO15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. McNamara, M.G.; Jacobs, T.; Lamarca, A.; Hubner, R.A.; Valle, J.W.; Amir, E. Impact of high tumor mutational burden in solid tumors and challenges for biomarker application. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2020, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Goodman, A.M.; Kato, S.; Bazhenova, L.; Patel, S.P.; Frampton, G.M.; Miller, V.; Stephens, P.J.; Daniels, G.A.; Kurzrock, R. Tumor Mutational Burden as an Independent Predictor of Response to Immunotherapy in Diverse Cancers. Mol. Cancer 2017, 16, 2598–2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Wang, Z.; Duan, J.; Cai, S.; Han, M.; Dong, H.; Zhao, J.; Zhu, B.; Wang, S.; Zhuo, M.; Sun, J.; et al. Assessment of Blood Tumor Mutational Burden as a Potential Biomarker for Immunotherapy in Patients With Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer With Use of a Next-Generation Sequencing Cancer Gene Panel. JAMA Oncol. 2019, 5, 696–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rizzo, A.; Mollica, V.; Massari, F. Expression of Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 as a Predictive Biomarker in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Patients Treated with First-line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Versus Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur. Urol. Focus 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chalmers, Z.R.; Connelly, C.F.; Fabrizio, D.; Gay, L.; Ali, S.M.; Ennis, R.; Schrock, A.; Campbell, B.; Shlien, A.; Chmielecki, J.; et al. Analysis of 100,000 human cancer genomes reveals the landscape of tumor mutational burden. Genome Med. 2017, 9, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Santoni, M.; Bracarda, S.; Nabissi, M.; Massari, F.; Conti, A.; Bria, E.; Tortora, G.; Santoni, G.; Cascinu, S. CXC and CC chem-okines as angiogenic modulators in nonhaematological tumors. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 768758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Schematic figure representing the mechanism of action of immune checkpoint inhibitors: (A) Immune checkpoint inhibits T-cell activation; (B) PD-1 inhibitors lead to T-cell activation.
Figure 1. Schematic figure representing the mechanism of action of immune checkpoint inhibitors: (A) Immune checkpoint inhibits T-cell activation; (B) PD-1 inhibitors lead to T-cell activation.
Jcm 10 05246 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rizzo, A.; Mollica, V.; Santoni, M.; Massari, F. Cancer Immunotherapy: Current and Future Perspectives on a Therapeutic Revolution. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5246. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225246

AMA Style

Rizzo A, Mollica V, Santoni M, Massari F. Cancer Immunotherapy: Current and Future Perspectives on a Therapeutic Revolution. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(22):5246. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225246

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rizzo, Alessandro, Veronica Mollica, Matteo Santoni, and Francesco Massari. 2021. "Cancer Immunotherapy: Current and Future Perspectives on a Therapeutic Revolution" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 22: 5246. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225246

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop