Next Article in Journal
Correction: Dobrovskiy et al. The Transport Properties of Semi-Crystalline Polyetherimide BPDA-P3 in Amorphous and Ordered States: Computer Simulations. Membranes 2022, 12, 856
Previous Article in Journal
A Short Review of Advances in MOF Glass Membranes for Gas Adsorption and Separation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thorium Removal, Recovery and Recycling: A Membrane Challenge for Urban Mining
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial for the Special Issue “Preparation and Application of Advanced Functional Membranes”

by
Annarosa Gugliuzza
1,* and
Cristiana Boi
2,3,*
1
Institute on Membrane Technology-National Research Council, CNR-ITM, Via Pietro Bucci 17C, 87036 Rende, Italy
2
Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Terracini 28, 40131 Bologna, Italy
3
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7905, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2024, 14(5), 100; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14050100
Submission received: 15 January 2024 / Revised: 9 April 2024 / Accepted: 18 April 2024 / Published: 26 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Preparation and Application of Advanced Functional Membranes)

1. Introduction

Membrane science is a discipline that cuts across almost all fields of research and experimentation [1]. It is well suited to the demand for best practices that provide sustainable solutions for natural resource management [2,3], pollution remediation [4,5], the recovery and recycling of value-added products from waste [6], and energy production and storage [7]. Advanced technologies are also being proposed for sustainable agriculture and industrial practices [8], textiles [9], biomedicine [10], packaging [11], and cultural assets [12,13]. In each case, membrane science provides multidisciplinary approaches to understand and control phenomena at different length scales, so the design and development of membrane devices and technologies requires the interplay of complementary disciplines, including modeling and simulation, membrane fabrication and characterization, process implementation, the build up of prototyping, and technology transfer. Membrane technology also has the advantage of being easy to integrate with other more conventional technologies, being remotely controllable and adaptable to different volumetric spaces [14]. Additionally, its sustainability offers the opportunity to be powered by green energy as an alternative fuel source [15]. Membrane technology is built upon both challenging and basic concepts such as the development of interfaces enabling the selective passage of bioactive molecules, ions, liquids (such as water), and gases according to well-established transport mechanisms. The latter can be regarded as the result of the intricate channels, pathways, and pores generated inside the membranes [1], as well as the accessibility to chemical moieties working as temporary adsorption sites or donor–bridge–acceptor systems [16,17].
Combining sustainable membrane design and technology is a major challenge in membrane science [18,19]. The aim is to provide solutions and best practices to manage and recover resources according to the principles of the circular green economy and durability [20,21]. Accordingly, a multidisciplinary approach is often proposed to implement the desired membrane operation on an industrial scale through process optimization, which involves a step-by-step experimental investigation and theoretical analysis, along with feasibility and cost-effectiveness assessments. First of all, the development of membranes with specific morphological and chemical features allows for the manipulation of desired or undesired events conceivable at the nano and micro scale so that the corresponding effects can be amplified at the macro scale. Once the type of operation is identified, the choice of the fabrication process that will be used to obtain suitable structural and chemical features in a predefined volumetric space becomes crucial. In fact, a jigsaw puzzle of functions can generate specific relationships for cooperative mechanisms that allow one to obtain the targets of a specific separation process. In recent years, advanced manufacturing processes, along with diverse families of materials, have been proposed to shift the perspective of membranes from traditional physical barriers [1] to interactive [22] and, where required, smart selective interfaces [23]. Thus, traditional phase inversion [1], track-etching [24], stretching [25], and interfacial polymerization [26] have been optimized or combined with more advanced fabrication methods, including phase separation micromolding [27], electrospinning [28], copolymer self-assembly [29], breath figure self-assembly [30], lithography [31], layer-by-layer assembly [32], and many others. On the other hand, different classes of materials, including organic fillers [33,34], nanotubes [35,36], nanoparticles [37,38], 2D materials [39,40], and quantum dots [41], have recently been proposed to promote (i) the assisted transport of gas/vapors [42,43], liquids [44,45], and ions [46,47] through membranes; (ii) improved selectivity [48,49] and high recovery factors [50,51]; (iii) energy saving [52,53]; and (iv) long-term durability [54,55].
In the last two decades, the number of papers focusing on membrane fabrication has increased exponentially (Figure 1a), confirming the growing awareness of the need to develop new functional membranes for effective operations in different subject areas (Figure 1b).
At the same time, the use of membrane technology has expanded, as it is seen as a practical way to manage natural resources and provide tangible solutions for environmental remediation, including water purification, CO2 capture, and pollution control. For example, the number of articles on water purification in the last 20 years (Figure 2a) has shown an increasing trend, reaching a maximum of almost 1464 in 2022. The rise in the number of publications dedicated to membranes for energy applications has been exponential, reaching almost 3000 articles in 2023 (Figure 2b). This is because membranes can play a fundamental role in the more efficient use of natural resources for energy applications, with membranes suitable for application in batteries, hydrogen separation, and fuel cells serving as important examples.
This Special Issue, “Preparation and Application of Advanced Functional Membranes”, offers some significant novel insights into the vast research dedicated to membrane manufacturing and applications, comprising ten interesting original articles and two reviews.

2. Overview of Published Articles

The ten original articles featured in this Special Issue deal with various issues related to water desalination (1), aqueous stream purification (2), antibacterial activity (1), controlled release (1), gas separation (2), the modeling of molecular transport through membranes (2), and nanohole formation in membranes (1). Two noteworthy reviews complete the Special Issue: the first focuses on nanocellulose green membranes and their related applications, and the second discusses the use of membranes for thorium removal, recovery, and recycling. Di Luca et al. [56] propose polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes engineered with supramolecular complexes based on smart poly(N-isopropyl acrylamide) (PNIPAM) mixed hydrogels with aliquots of ZrO(O2C-C10H6-CO2) (MIL-140) and graphene to make water desalination more sustainable and effective under relatively soft working conditions. Cooperative mechanisms take place at subnanometer scale to increase freshwater production, contrast fouling events, and facilitate in situ cleaning so that distinct effects can be induced by a simple switch of the density charge at the membrane interface without the need for additional chemicals or processing steps. Regarding the results, fluxes five times higher than pristine PVDF membrane were obtained after engineered membranes coming into contact with a mixture of NaCl (35 g L−1) and humic acid (1 mg mL−1); effective antifouling and safer and more sustainable self-cleaning actions helped to (i) limit the decline in the flux with time and (ii) allow for the recovery of up to 99% of the water permeation properties of the functional membranes.
Butylskii et al. [57] developed a new recycling method for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) using a hybrid electrobaromembrane (EBM) approach. This technique selectively separates Li+ and Co2+ ions using a special membrane with a pore diameter of 35 nm. The process combines an electric field and a pressure field to achieve highly efficient ion separation. The flux of lithium through the membrane is approximately 0.3 mol m−2 h−1, and the presence of coexisting nickel ions does not interfere with lithium separation. Also, under conditions where the feeding and receiving solutions are identical, the flux of cobalt ions can be directed from the receiving to the feeding solution, leading to a result that is close to zero (–0.0025 mol m−2 h−1) and an ion separation coefficient of Li+ and Co2+ ions of −55. EBM conditions can be tailored to extract only lithium while leaving cobalt and nickel in the feed solution with a separation coefficient equal to infinity. This process holds promise for meeting the global demand for lithium and mitigating e-waste issues.
Joosten et al. [58] developed electrospun wire membrane adsorbers based on sulfonated poly(ether-ether-ketone) (sPEEK) for the recovery of valuable resources. These membrane adsorbers selectively bind lysozyme and have potential applications in the removal of heavy metals, dyes, and pharmaceutical components. Variations in fiber diameter have minimal effect on specific surface area and dynamic adsorption capacity. Different degrees of sulfonation of sPEEK do not proportionally affect the adsorption capacity. A dynamic lysozyme adsorption capacity of 59.3 mg/g can be achieved at 10% breakthrough regardless of flow rate. This study highlights the role of fiber diameter and functional group density in optimizing membrane adsorber performance. More specifically, variations in fiber diameter and functional group density do not significantly affect the binding capacity, meaning that a membrane absorber can be realized easily and used immediately to bind positively charged molecules without further morphological and chemical adjustments. This research article provides a valuable and prompt solution for efficient resource recovery and purification.
Composite ultrafiltration membranes have been prepared by Figuereido et al. [59] using cellulose acetate and silver nanoparticles. Varying the membrane structure results in different antibacterial effects against E. coli. The presence of silver nanoparticles significantly inhibits the growth of E. coli. More permeable membranes have higher silver contents and superior growth inhibition. When fully immersed in an E. coli suspension, the antibacterial activity of both silver-free and AgNP membranes are suitably correlated with surface chemical composition and silver accessibility, resulting in an efficient inhibition pattern for membranes with AgNPs. These results point towards potential applications in water purification and other areas related to antibacterial action.
The research article authored by Pereira et al. [60] focuses on magnetic-responsive hydrogels for liposomal drug delivery. They have developed systems with liposomes containing ferulic acid (FA) encapsulated in gelatin hydrogel membranes with iron oxide nanoparticles (MNPs). Their study compared these systems with conventional drug delivery methods. FA release from the liposomal gelatin followed the Korsmeyer–Peppas model, suggesting controlled diffusion in the absence of a magnetic field. However, under magnetic stimulation, due to the dispersed MNPs in the matrix, the release of FA from the liposomal gelatin membrane undergoes an increase in the constant rates; while keeping a diffusional controlled FA release mechanism, the FA release changes from Fickian diffusion to quasi-Fickian diffusion. Low-intensity magnetic fields stimulate FA release and shift the mechanism. The liposomal gelatin systems therefore offer a smoother and more controlled release of FA, with the potential for longer-term therapeutic use. This approach opens doors for novel magnetically controlled drug delivery approaches in biomedicine.
Liu et al.’s article [61] presents a computational mechanistic study that was conducted to understand how to remove acid gases from natural gas by using new functionalized GO membranes. They studied the adsorption and diffusion of several gases in 1,4-phenylenediamine-2-sulfonate (PDASA)-doped GO membrane channels, providing new insights into the solubility coefficient of CO2 and H2S. They estimated, for these two gases, a binding affinity that is higher than that computed for CH4 and N2. Their theoretical analysis suggested multilayer adsorption in functionalized GO membrane channels according to the Redlich–Peterson model, while the Langmuir model was used to describe weak adsorption for no polar gases. The result is an enhanced permeability and selectivity of acid gases such as CO2 and H2S—i.e., PCO2 = 7265.5 Barrer, αCO2/CH4 = 95.7; P(H2S + CO2) = 42,075.1 Barrer, αH2S/CH4 = 243.8—over CH4, with a performance superior to that observed for more traditional GO membranes.
Polak et al. [62] provide an in depth-study of the transport properties of Pebax@2533 membranes filled with SiO2, ZIF−8, and POSS-Ph over a broad range of temperatures and pressures, providing permeability, diffusivity, and solubility data for N2, CH4, and CO2 gases. CO2 selectivity was also examined as a function of temperature and pressure effects. The permeability increased with temperature, leading to a predominance of the diffusivity mechanism over the solubility one. Instead, the increase in pressure enhances CO2 permeability, while greater benefits can be obtained for N2 and CH4 gases in terms of diffusivity.
Water vapor transport was studied through Pebax@2533 membranes filled with the ionic liquid [C12C1im]Cl (30 to 70 wt.%) by the authors of [63]. This theoretical study, which was inspired by prior experimental evidence, was conducted to establish how the addition of ionic liquid (IL) to the elastomeric membranes generates preferential pathways for water molecules, reaching values of water permeability of 85 × 10−3 g m−2 day−1 m at 318 K and with a content of [C12C1im]Cl around 70 wt.%. Molecular dynamics simulations yield new insights into the role of the anions and cationic head groups of IL in directing water molecule diffusion. This pathway becomes wider with increases in temperature and IL concentration due to the larger water-accessible area. The use of smart organic nanofillers such as ionic liquids is herein demonstrated to make Pebax membranes breathable to a desired extent and in a reversible way. This type of engineered membrane is extremely interesting for the construction of environmental micro-regulation devices.
The study contributed by Strzelewicz et al. [64] explores particle diffusion in heterogeneous membrane-like structures by studying the interplay between membrane structure, external drift forces, and diffusion characteristics. They used Cauchy flight diffusion with drift and compared it to Gaussian random walk. The results show that strong drift can halt Gaussian diffusion while promoting superdiffusion with Cauchy flight. The membrane structures, which mimic real polymeric membranes with inorganic powders and designed obstacles, influence the transport behavior. More specifically, this paper proves that, under weak drift, the diffusion is controlled by the local environment, that is, the membrane. For stronger drift, superdiffusion is recognized, and in cases of excessively strong drift, the Brownian motion is almost stopped while tracers are pushed against obstacles. However, this pushing is overcome by random motion. Understanding these relationships is critical to improving the efficiency of processes that rely on membrane-based transport. This study underscores the role of structure and drift in shaping particle movement across membranes.
Ceccio et al. [65] propose the use of non-destructive ion transmission spectroscopy (ITS) and neutron depth profiling (NDP) to analyze, monitor, and quantify the evolution of etched micron-sized pores, the shape of which, in their study, transferred from latent tracks to a conical form (for one-sided etching) and, through a symmetrical (double-sided) etching process, to a well-developed cylindrical geometry. Using a traditional wet chemical etching process, they used dopants such as LiCl solution or boron to fill and generate defined pores and evaluated the effects on their shape and depth. As an example, the volume of the pore is demonstrated to increase linearly with both the etching temperature and time. Doping the etched tracks with 5 M LiCl, reductions of 24% and 11% can be obtained for the pore volume using etching times of 45 and 60 min, respectively. No destructive techniques allow for the investigation and quantification of every single effect of the working parameters on the final pore shape and size. This contribution falls into the list of studies dedicated to the fabrication and characterization of membranes with well controlled morphologies.
Nitodas et al. [66] focus on the sustainable use of nanocellulose to prepare membranes useful for a large range of applications, including water purification, desalination, antimicrobial applications, gas separation, and gas barrier applications. After an introduction to the synthesis and characterization of nanomaterials for nanocellulose membranes, case studies are illustrated through comparative analyses, highlighting the biodegradability, non-toxicity, low density, thermal stability, long-term reinforcement capabilities, and high mechanical strength of the proposed materials. Interestingly, this review provides further insights into the non-conventional uses of nanocellulose membranes in biomedical fields and other, more recreational practices, such as musical instruments.
Man et al. [67] discusses the use of membrane processes to address the removal, recovery, and recycling of thorium from industrial residues that often end up in municipal waste treatment facilities. They cover the biomedically relevant aspects of thorium, thorium detection techniques, classical extraction methods, and various membrane processes, such as electrodialysis and the use of liquid membranes. Special emphasis is placed on urban mining and the valorization of thorium. Moreover, this paper aims to provide insight into the safe handling of thorium and environmental protection through proposing practices and actions for the removal, recovery, and valorization of thorium.

3. Conclusions

The articles published in this Special Issue represent valuable contributions to the research dedicated to the development of new functional membranes for sustainable separation processes. Best practices are proposed to improve the performance of various separation processes, including water desalination, waste purification, CO2 capture, antimicrobial applications, and smart drug delivery. Conceivable solutions are anticipated to make the operation of each membrane more ecofriendly through the selection of non-polluting, recyclable, and biodegradable materials, the use of low-environmental-impact manufacturing schemes, and the implementation of purification technologies for specific case studies. It is important to note that the output of each process is always related to the specific features of the membranes, including their morphological properties and chemical functionalities, which can be manipulated by external triggers. On the other hand, the understanding of transport mechanisms is always related to the intrinsic structural and chemical aspects of the membranes, as ascertained through the carrying out of theoretical analyses and experimental research.
As a final note, we would like to highlight that this Special Issue collects transversal and complementary contributions from China, the USA, and multiple European Countries, representing a shared and enhanced cross-technology research effort based upon issues regarding environmental and health protection.

Author Contributions

The authors equally contributed to the Editorial. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We acknowledge the financial grant we received from ‘the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation’ within the framework of the Great Relevance International Project Italy (MAECI)-China (NSFC) 2018–2020—New Materials, with particular reference to Two-dimensional systems and Graphene (2DMEMPUR), MAE00694722021-05-20 and the University of Bologna for the project RFO_2023_BOI.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank all of the authors for providing valuable contributions to this Special Issue, all of the reviewers for their valuable support and efforts made to improve the quality of the submitted papers, and our Assistant Editor for supporting the production of this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Strathmann, H. Introduction to Membrane Science and Technology; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH: Weinheim, Germany, 2011; pp. 1–544. [Google Scholar]
  2. Issaoui, M.; Jellali, S.; Zorpas, A.A.; Dutournie, P. Membrane technology for sustainable water resources management: Challenges and future projections. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2022, 25, 100590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Komaladewi, A.A.I.A.S.; Aryanti, P.T.P.; Subagia, I.D.G.A.; Wenten, I.G. Membrane technology in air pollution control: Prospect and challenge. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1217, 012046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kang, Y.; Zhong, Z.; Xing, W. Functionalized membranes for multipollutants bearing air treatment. In Hybrid and Combined Processes for Air Pollution Control; Assadi, A., Amrane, A., Nguyen, T.A., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 167–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cheng, Y.; Xia, C.; Garalleh, H.A.L.; Garaleh, M.; Lan Chi, N.T.; Brindhadevi, K. A review on optimistic development of polymeric nanocomposite membrane on environmental remediation. Chemosphere 2023, 315, 137706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, X.; Van der Bruggen, B.; Matsuyama, H.; Lin, Y.; Zheng, J. Resource Recovery and Recycling from Water Streams: Advanced Membrane Technologies and Case Studies. ACS EST Water 2023, 3, 1699–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yaroslavtsev, A.B.; Stenina, I.A.; Golubenko, D.V. Membrane materials for energy production and storage. Pure Appl. Chem. 2020, 92, 1147–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mzahma, S.; Duplay, J.; Souguir, D.; Ben Amar, R.; Ghazi, M.; Hachicha, M. Membrane Processes Treatment and Possibility of Agriculture Reuse of Textile Effluents: Study Case in Tunisia. Water 2023, 15, 1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Van der Bruggen, B.B.; Curcio, E.; Drioli, E. Process intensification in the textile industry: The role of membrane technology. J. Environ. Manag. 2004, 73, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hariharan, P.; Sundarrajan, S.; Arthanareeswaran, G.; Seshan, S.; Das, D.B.; Ismail, A.F. Advancements in modification of membrane materials over membrane separation for biomedical applications—Review. Environ. Res. Part B 2022, 204, 112045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sommer, B. Membrane Packing Problems: A Short Review on Computational Membrane Modeling Methods and Tools. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2013, 5, e201302014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Llorensa, J.; Zanelli, A. Structural membranes for refurbishment of the architectural heritage. Procedia Eng. 2016, 155, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Van, N.T.B.; Singyabuth, S. Cultural Sustainability of Hoi an Ancient Houses in the process of becoming the World Cultural Heritage City. Int. J. Membr. Sci. Technol. 2023, 10, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Basile, A.; Charcosset, C. Integrated Membrane Systems and Processes; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2016; pp. 1–424. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gugliuzza, A.; Basile, A. Membranes for Clean and Renewable Power Applications; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 1–410. [Google Scholar]
  16. Nghiem, L.D.; Schäfer, A.I.; Waite, T.D. Adsorptive Interactions between Membranes and Trace Contaminants. Desalination 2002, 147, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Siddiqui, S.A.; Abdullah, M.M. Molecular modeling and simulation of some efficient charge transfer materials using density functional theory. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 22, 100788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Comitti, A.; Vijayakumaran, H.; Nejabatmeimandi, M.H.; Seixas, L.; Cabello, A.; Misseroni, D.; Penasa, M.; Paech, C.; Bessa, M.; Bown, A.C.; et al. Ultralight Membrane Structures Toward a Sustainable Environment. In Sustainable Structures and Buildings; Bahrami, A., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dhume, S.; Chendake, Y. Membrane Technology for Green Engineering. In Applied Biopolymer Technology and Bioplastics, Sustainable Development by Green Engineering Materials; Rawat, N.K., Volova, T.G., Haghi, A.K., Eds.; Apple Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  20. Landaburu-Aguirre, J.; Molina, S. Circular Economy in Membrane Technology. Membranes 2023, 13, 784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ludovic, F.; Dumée, L.F.; Sadrzadeh, M.; Shirazi, M.M.A. Green Membrane Technologies towards Environmental Sustainability; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 1–646. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gugliuzza, A.; Aceto, M.C.; Drioli, E. Interactive functional poly(vinylidene fluoride) membranes with modulated lysozyme affinity: A promising class of new interfaces for contactor crystallizers. Polym. Int. 2009, 58, 1452–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pan, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yang, S.; Zhang, C.; Ullah, Z. Recent research progress on the stimuli-responsive smart membrane: A review. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2023, 12, 20220538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Apel, P. Track etching technique in membrane technology. Radiat. Meas. 2001, 34, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, K.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, L.; Zeng, F.; Hou, D.; Wang, J. Optimizing stretching conditions in fabrication of PTFE hollow fiber membrane for performance improvement in membrane distillation. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 550, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Baig, U.; Waheed, A. Exploiting interfacial polymerization to fabricate hyper-cross-linked nanofiltration membrane with a constituent linear aliphatic amine for freshwater production. npj Clean Water 2022, 5, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vogelaar, L.; Lammertink, R.G.H.; Barsema, J.N.; Nijdam, W.; Bolhuis-Versteeg, L.A.M.; van Rijn, C.J.M.; Wessling, M. Phase Separation Micromolding: A New Generic Approach for Microstructuring Various Materials. Small 2005, 1, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ahmed, F.Z.; Lalia, B.S.; Hashaikeh, R. A review on electrospinning for membrane fabrication: Challenges and applications. Desalination 2015, 356, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hamta, A.; Ashtiani, F.Z.; Karimi, M.; Moayedfard, S. Asymmetric block copolymer membrane fabrication mechanism through self-assembly and non-solvent induced phase separation (SNIPS) process. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Perrotta, M.L.; Saielli, G.; Casella, G.; Macedonio, F.; Giorno, L.; Drioli, E.; Gugliuzza, A. An ultrathin suspended hydrophobic porous membrane for high-efficiency water desalination. Appl. Mater. Today 2017, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sabirova, A.; Florica, C.F.; Pisig, F.; Syed, A.; Buttner, U.; Li, X.; Nunes, S.P. Nanoporous membrane fabrication by nanoimprint lithography for nanoparticle sieving. Nanoscale Adv. 2022, 4, 1119–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Joseph, N.; Ahmadiannamini, P.; Hoogenboom, R.; Vankelecom, I.F.G. Layer-by-layer preparation of polyelectrolyte multilayer membranes for separation. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 1817–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gugliuzza, A.; Drioli, E. Role of additives in the water vapor transport through block co-poly(amide/ether) membranes: Effects on surface and bulk polymer properties. Eur. Polym. J. 2004, 40, 2381–2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hao, L.; Li, P.; Chung, T.-S. PIM-1 as an organic filler to enhance the gas separation performance of Ultem polyetherimide. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 453, 614–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, R.; Chen, D.; Wang, Q.; Ying, Y.; Gao, W.; Xie, L. Recent Advances in Applications of Carbon Nanotubes for Desalination: A Review. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Amirkhani, F.; Mosadegh, M.; Asghari, M.; Parnian, M.J. The beneficial impacts of functional groups of CNT on structure and gas separation properties of PEBA mixed matrix membranes. Polym. Test. 2020, 82, 106285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gnus, M.; Dudek, G.; Turczyn, R. The influence of filler type on the separation properties of mixed-matrix membranes. Chem. Pap. 2018, 72, 1095–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. De Pascale, M.; De Angelis, M.G.; Boi, C. Mixed Matrix Membranes Adsorbers (MMMAs) for the Removal of Uremic Toxins from Dialysate. Membranes 2022, 12, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Suvigya, K.; Lalita, S.; Gopinadhan, K. Membranes for desalination and dye separation: Are 2D materials better than polymers? A critical comparison. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 325, 124693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cheng, L.; Liu, G.; Zhao, J.; Jin, W. Two-Dimensional-Material Membranes: Manipulating the Transport Pathway for Molecular Separation. Acc. Mater. Res. 2021, 2, 114–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kim, A.; Moon, S.J.; Kim, J.H.; Patel, R. Review on thin-film nanocomposite membranes with various quantum dots for water treatments. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2023, 118, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Frappa, M.; Del Rio Castillo, A.E.; Macedonio, F.; Pellegrini, V.; Drioli, E.; Gugliuzza, A. A few-layer graphene for advanced composite PVDF membranes dedicated to water desalination: A comparative study. Nanoscale Adv. 2020, 2, 4728–4739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ferrari, M.C. Recent developments in 2D materials for gas separation membranes. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2023, 40, 100905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, H.; Zheng, Y.; Yu, S.; Chen, W.; Yang, J. A Review of Advancing Two-Dimensional Material Membranes for Ultrafast and Highly Selective Liquid Separation. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Nasrollahi, N.; Aber, S.; Vatanpour, V.; Mahmoodi, N.M. Development of hydrophilic microporous PES ultrafiltration membrane containing CuO nanoparticles with improved antifouling and separation performance. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019, 222, 338–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cao, T.-X.; Xie, R.; Ju, X.-J.; Wang, W.; Pan, D.-W.; Liu, Z.; Chu, L.-Y. Biomimetic Two-Dimensional Composited Membranes for Ion Separation and Desalination. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2023, 62, 14772–14790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kim, S.; Wang, H.; Moo Lee, Y.M. 2D Nanosheets and Their Composite Membranes for Water, Gas, and Ion Separation. Ang. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 17483–17871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Galizia, M.; Chi, W.S.; Smith, Z.S.; Merkel, T.C.; Baker, R.W.; Freeman, B.D. 50th Anniversary Perspective: Polymers and Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas and Vapor Separation: A Review and Prospective Opportunities. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 7809–7843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, Z.; Rahman, M.; Abetz, C.; AbetzJ, V. High-performance asymmetric isoporous nanocomposite membranes with chemically-tailored amphiphilic nanochannels. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 9554–9566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sardarabadi, H.; Kiani, S.; Karkhanechi, H.; Mousavi, S.M.; Saljoughi, E.; Matsuyama, H. Effect of Nanofillers on Properties and Pervaporation Performance of Nanocomposite Membranes: A Review. Membranes 2022, 12, 1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Agboola, O.; Fayomi, O.S.I.; Ayodeji, A.; Ayeni, A.O.; Alagbe, E.E.; Sanni, S.E.; Okoro, E.E.; Moropeng, L.; Sadiku, R.; Kupolati, K.W.; et al. A Review on Polymer Nanocomposites and Their Effective Applications in Membranes and Adsorbents for Water Treatment and Gas Separation. Membranes 2021, 11, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Frappa, M.; Castillo, A.E.D.R.; Macedonio, F.; Di Luca, G.; Drioli, E.; Gugliuzza, A. Exfoliated Bi2Te3-enabled membranes for new concept water desalination: Freshwater production meets new routes. Water Res. 2021, 203, 117503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zeng, H.; He, S.; Hosseini, S.S.; Zhu, B.; Shao, L. Emerging nanomaterial incorporated membranes for gas separation and pervaporation towards energetic-efficient applications. Adv. Membr. 2022, 2, 100015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cay-Durgun, P.; McCloskey, C.; Konecny, J.; Khosravi, A.; Lind, M.L. Evaluation of thin film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membranes for long-term brackish water desalination performance. Desalination 2017, 404, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Janakiram, S.; Ahmadi, M.; Dai, Z.; Ansaloni, L.; Deng, L. Performance of Nanocomposite Membranes Containing 0D to 2D Nanofillers for CO2 Separation: A Review. Membranes 2018, 8, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Di Luca, G.; Chen, G.; Jin, W.; Gugliuzza, A. Aliquots of MIL-140 and Graphene in Smart PNIPAM Mixed Hydrogels: A Nanoenvironment for a More Eco-Friendly Treatment of NaCl and Humic Acid Mixtures by Membrane Distillation. Membranes 2023, 13, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Butylskii, D.; Troitskiy, V.; Chuprynina, D.; Dammak, L.; Larchet, C.; Nikonenko, V. Application of Hybrid Electrobaromembrane Process for Selective Recovery of Lithium from Cobalt- and Nickel-Containing Leaching Solutions. Membranes 2023, 13, 509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Joosten, N.; Wyrębak, W.; Schenning, A.; Nijmeijer, K.; Borneman, Z. On the Performance of a Ready-to-Use Electrospun Sulfonated Poly(Ether Ether Ketone) Membrane Adsorber. Membranes 2023, 13, 543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Figueiredo, A.S.; Ferraria, A.M.; Botelho do Rego, A.M.; Monteiro, S.; Santos, R.; Minhalma, M.; Sánchez-Loredo, M.G.; Tovar-Tovar, R.L.; de Pinho, M.N. Bactericide Activity of Cellulose Acetate/Silver Nanoparticles Asymmetric Membranes: Surfaces and Porous Structures Role. Membranes 2023, 13, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Pereira, L.; Ferreira, F.C.; Pires, F.; Portugal, C.A.M. Magnetic-Responsive Liposomal Hydrogel Membranes for Controlled Release of Small Bioactive Molecules-An Insight into the Release Kinetics. Membranes 2023, 13, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Liu, Q.; Yang, Z.; Liu, G.; Sun, L.; Xu, R.; Zhong, J. Functionalized GO Membranes for Efficient Separation of Acid Gases from Natural Gas: A Computational Mechanistic Understanding. Membranes 2022, 12, 1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Polak, D.; Szwast, M. Analysis of the Influence of Process Parameters on the Properties of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Membranes for Gas Separation. Membranes 2022, 12, 1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Cheng, Z.; Li, S.; Tocci, E.; Saielli, G.; Gugliuzza, A.; Wang, Y. Pathway for Water Transport through Breathable Nanocomposite Membranes of PEBAX with Ionic Liquid [C12C1im]Cl. Membranes 2023, 13, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Strzelewicz, A.; Krasowska, M.; Cieśla, M. Lévy Flights Diffusion with Drift in Heterogeneous Membranes. Membranes 2023, 13, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ceccio, G.; Vacik, J.; Siegel, J.; Cannavó, A.; Choukourov, A.; Pleskunov, P.; Tosca, M.; Fink, D. Etching and Doping of Pores in Polyethylene Terephthalate Analyzed by Ion Transmission Spectroscopy and Nuclear Depth Profiling. Membranes 2022, 12, 1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Nitodas, S.; Skehan, M.; Liu, H.; Shah, R. Current and Potential Applications of Green Membranes with Nanocellulose. Membranes 2023, 13, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Man, G.T.; Albu, P.C.; Nechifor, A.C.; Grosu, A.R.; Tanczos, S.-K.; Grosu, V.-A.; Ioan, M.-R.; Nechifor, G. Thorium Removal, Recovery and Recycling: A Membrane Challenge for Urban Mining. Membranes 2023, 13, 765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Annual publications on the subject of membrane fabrication (a) and subject areas’ contributions to the literature (b) over the past 20 years (2000–2023). Source: Scopus.
Figure 1. Annual publications on the subject of membrane fabrication (a) and subject areas’ contributions to the literature (b) over the past 20 years (2000–2023). Source: Scopus.
Membranes 14 00100 g001aMembranes 14 00100 g001b
Figure 2. Annual publications on (a) membranes for water purification and (b) membranes for energy applications in the last 20 years (2000–2023). Source: Scopus.
Figure 2. Annual publications on (a) membranes for water purification and (b) membranes for energy applications in the last 20 years (2000–2023). Source: Scopus.
Membranes 14 00100 g002aMembranes 14 00100 g002b
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gugliuzza, A.; Boi, C. Editorial for the Special Issue “Preparation and Application of Advanced Functional Membranes”. Membranes 2024, 14, 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14050100

AMA Style

Gugliuzza A, Boi C. Editorial for the Special Issue “Preparation and Application of Advanced Functional Membranes”. Membranes. 2024; 14(5):100. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14050100

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gugliuzza, Annarosa, and Cristiana Boi. 2024. "Editorial for the Special Issue “Preparation and Application of Advanced Functional Membranes”" Membranes 14, no. 5: 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes14050100

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop