Next Article in Journal
Next Article in Special Issue
Previous Article in Journal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microarrays 2014, 3(2), 137-158; doi:10.3390/microarrays3020137
Article

Qualitative and Quantitative Requirements for Assessing Prognostic Markers in Prostate Cancer

1,†
, 1,†
, 1
, 1
, 2
, 1
, 1
, 1
, 1
, 1
, 3,4
 and 1,*
Received: 3 March 2014; in revised form: 28 March 2014 / Accepted: 2 April 2014 / Published: 17 April 2014
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [2495 KB, updated 23 April 2014; original version uploaded 17 April 2014]
Abstract: Molecular prognostic markers are urgently needed in order to improve therapy decisions in prostate cancer. To better understand the requirements for biomarker studies, we re-analyzed prostate cancer tissue microarray immunohistochemistry (IHC) data from 39 prognosis markers in subsets of 50 – >10,000 tumors. We found a strong association between the “prognostic power” of individual markers and the number of tissues that should be minimally included in such studies. The prognostic relevance of more than 90% of the 39 IHC markers could be detected if ≥6400 tissue samples were analyzed. Studying markers of tissue quality, including immunohistochemistry of ets-related gene (ERG) and vimentin, and fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), we found that 18% of tissues in our tissue microarray (TMA) showed signs of reduced tissue preservation and limited immunoreactivity. Comparing the results of Kaplan-Meier survival analyses or associations to ERG immunohistochemistry in subsets of tumors with and without exclusion of these defective tissues did not reveal statistically relevant differences. In summary, our study demonstrates that TMA-based marker validation studies using biochemical recurrence as an endpoint require at least 6400 individual tissue samples for establishing statistically relevant associations between the expression of molecular markers and patient outcome if weak to moderate prognosticators should also be reliably identified.
Keywords: tissue microarray; prostate cancer; tissue quality; number of samples; prognosis; marker validation tissue microarray; prostate cancer; tissue quality; number of samples; prognosis; marker validation
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Burdelski, C.; Matuszewska, A.; Kluth, M.; Koop, C.; Grupp, K.; Steurer, S.; Wittmer, C.; Minner, S.; Tsourlakis, M.C.; Sauter, G.; Schlomm, T.; Simon, R. Qualitative and Quantitative Requirements for Assessing Prognostic Markers in Prostate Cancer. Microarrays 2014, 3, 137-158.

AMA Style

Burdelski C, Matuszewska A, Kluth M, Koop C, Grupp K, Steurer S, Wittmer C, Minner S, Tsourlakis MC, Sauter G, Schlomm T, Simon R. Qualitative and Quantitative Requirements for Assessing Prognostic Markers in Prostate Cancer. Microarrays. 2014; 3(2):137-158.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Burdelski, Christoph; Matuszewska, Aleksandra; Kluth, Martina; Koop, Christina; Grupp, Katharina; Steurer, Stefan; Wittmer, Corinna; Minner, Sarah; Tsourlakis, Maria C.; Sauter, Guido; Schlomm, Thorsten; Simon, Ronald. 2014. "Qualitative and Quantitative Requirements for Assessing Prognostic Markers in Prostate Cancer." Microarrays 3, no. 2: 137-158.

Microarrays EISSN 2076-3905 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert