Next Article in Journal
A Modified Bayesian Network Model to Predict Reorder Level of Printed Circuit Board
Next Article in Special Issue
CO2 Capture by Alkaline Solution for Carbonate Production: A Comparison between a Packed Column and a Membrane Contactor
Previous Article in Journal
Developing a File System Structure to Solve Healthy Big Data Storage and Archiving Problems Using a Distributed File System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Water Resistant Composite Membranes for Carbon Dioxide Separation from Methane
Article Menu
Issue 6 (June) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Appl. Sci. 2018, 8(6), 914; https://doi.org/10.3390/app8060914

Formic Acid Manufacture: Carbon Dioxide Utilization Alternatives

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Cantabria, Av. Los Castros s/n, 39005 Santander, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 7 May 2018 / Revised: 24 May 2018 / Accepted: 29 May 2018 / Published: 2 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon Capture Utilization and Sequestration (CCUS))
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [2020 KB, uploaded 2 June 2018]   |  

Abstract

Carbon dioxide (CO2) utilization alternatives for manufacturing formic acid (FA) such as electrochemical reduction (ER) or homogeneous catalysis of CO2 and H2 could be efficient options for developing more environmentally-friendly production alternatives to FA fossil-dependant production. However, these alternatives are currently found at different technological readiness levels (TRLs), and some remaining technical challenges need to be overcome to achieve at least carbon-even FA compared to the commercial process, especially ER of CO2, which is still farther from its industrial application. The main technical limitations inherited by FA production by ER are the low FA concentration achieved and the high overpotentials required, which involve high consumptions of energy (ER cell) and steam (distillation). In this study, a comparison in terms of carbon footprints (CF) using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) tool was done to evaluate the potential technological challenges assuring the environmental competitiveness of the FA production by ER of CO2. The CF of the FA conventional production were used as a benchmark, as well as the CF of a simulated plant based on homogeneous catalysts of CO2 and H2 (found closer to be commercial). Renewable energy utilization as PV solar for the reaction is essential to achieve a carbon-even product; however, the CF benefits are still negligible due to the enormous contribution of the steam produced by natural gas (purification stage). Some ER reactor configurations, plus a recirculation mode, could achieve an even CF versus commercial process. It was demonstrated that the ER alternatives could lead to lower natural resources consumption (mainly, natural gas and heavy fuel oil) compared to the commercial process, which is a noticeable advantage in environmental sustainability terms. View Full-Text
Keywords: carbon capture and utilization; formic acid; life cycle assessment; electrochemical reduction carbon capture and utilization; formic acid; life cycle assessment; electrochemical reduction
Figures

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Rumayor, M.; Dominguez-Ramos, A.; Irabien, A. Formic Acid Manufacture: Carbon Dioxide Utilization Alternatives. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 914.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Appl. Sci. EISSN 2076-3417 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top