Next Article in Journal
Black Heart Detection in White Radish by Hyperspectral Transmittance Imaging Combined with Chemometric Analysis and a Successive Projections Algorithm
Next Article in Special Issue
Study on the Load Distribution and Dynamic Characteristics of a Thin-Walled Integrated Squirrel-Cage Supporting Roller Bearing
Previous Article in Journal
Hardware Implementation and Validation of 3D Underwater Shape Reconstruction Algorithm Using a Stereo-Catadioptric System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dynamic Similitude Design Method of the Distorted Model on Variable Thickness Cantilever Plates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design of Cold-Formed Steel Screw Connections with Gypsum Sheathing at Ambient and Elevated Temperatures

1
Key Laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structures of the Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
2
Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2016, 6(9), 248; https://doi.org/10.3390/app6090248
Submission received: 16 June 2016 / Revised: 26 August 2016 / Accepted: 30 August 2016 / Published: 6 September 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Thin-Walled Structures)

Abstract

:
Load-bearing cold-formed steel (CFS) walls sheathed with double layers of gypsum plasterboard on both sides have demonstrated good fire resistance and attracted increasing interest for use in mid-rise CFS structures. As the main connection method, screw connections between CFS and gypsum sheathing play an important role in both the structural design and fire resistance of this wall system. However, studies on the mechanical behavior of screw connections with double-layer gypsum sheathing are still limited. In this study, 200 monotonic tests of screw connections with single- or double-layer gypsum sheathing at both ambient and elevated temperatures were conducted. The failure of screw connections with double-layer gypsum sheathing in shear was different from that of single-layer gypsum sheathing connections at ambient temperature, and it could be described as the breaking of the loaded sheathing edge combined with significant screw tilting and the loaded sheathing edge flexing fracture. However, the screw tilting and flexing fracture of the loaded sheathing edge gradually disappear at elevated temperatures. In addition, the influence of the loaded edge distance, double-layer sheathing and elevated temperatures is discussed in detail with clear conclusions. A unified design formula for the shear strength of screw connections with gypsum sheathing is proposed for ambient and elevated temperatures with adequate accuracy. A simplified load–displacement model with the post-peak branch is developed to evaluate the load–displacement response of screw connections with gypsum sheathing at ambient and elevated temperatures.

1. Introduction

In recent years, load-bearing cold-formed steel (CFS) walls sheathed with gypsum plasterboard on either side have been increasingly used in low- and mid-rise buildings. Screw fasteners that connect the CFS frame and gypsum sheathing have become the main connection method for this wall system. Due to the lateral constraints provided by the screw connections, the bearing capacity of a CFS frame can be significantly enhanced. To prevent failure of the sheathing-fastener-stud sheathing, the maximum nominal load for the screw connection was given for the all-steel design method of CFS wall studs in the design manual of American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) [1]. Moreover, screw connections make the walls behave similarly to diaphragms resisting in-plane lateral loads (wind and seismic loads) [2]. Hence, the mechanical behavior of the screw connections plays an important role in the design of CFS walls.
Several experimental investigations [3,4,5,6,7,8,9] have already been conducted on the shear response of screw connections with gypsum sheathing or other board materials at ambient temperature. Gypsum sheathing does not have a preferential material response in a specific direction [7], and the failure of screw connections with single-layer gypsum sheathing was mainly identified as breaking or bearing of the loaded sheathing edge [6,7,8]. Furthermore, the effect of the loading rate, steel thickness, loaded edge distance and loading protocol were also discussed with explicit conclusions [5,6,7,8,9]. Some mathematical models, such as the Foschi model [10], Pivot model [9,11] and Pinching 4 model [7], were used to describe the monotonic or cyclic load–displacement characteristic of connections at ambient temperature.
However, previous research [3,4,5,6,7,8,9] mainly focused on screw connections with only a single layer of sheathing material at ambient temperature. In mid-rise buildings, double layers of gypsum sheathing are necessary on both sides of load-bearing CFS walls to satisfy the fire resistance rating of at least 60 min [12,13,14]. The lateral resistance performance of CFS walls with double-layer gypsum sheathing on both sides has been shown to be different from that of walls with single-layer sheathing [15,16]. As described in the recently issued AISI standard [17], insufficient research exists to provide a definitive solution for the design of CFS walls with multiple layers of sheathing on an individual face of a wall. In addition, no literature was found regarding the shear response of screw fasteners with double-layer gypsum sheathing at ambient temperature. A few experiments were conducted on the mechanical behavior of CFS sheeting-fastener-sheeting connections at elevated temperatures [18,19,20]. However, investigation on the screw connections with board sheathing materials at elevated temperatures is still limited, so the mechanical contribution of gypsum sheathing in the previous theoretical and numerical investigation of CFS walls under fire conditions remains unknown [21,22].
According to the previous full-scale experiments [13], the loaded CFS wall assembly lined with double layers of gypsum plasterboard on both sides was subjected to the ISO834 fire exposure of 71 min, and the flexural deflection of steel studs increased rapidly towards the fire side at the final two minutes of fire exposure. Post-fire inspection showed that the fire-side gypsum plasterboard had good deformation compatibility with the CFS frame, and only few cracks were observed in the field of fire-side gypsum plasterboard. In addition, due to the shrinkage of gypsum and degenerated mechanical behavior of screw connections, the breaking of the loaded sheathing edge was identified along the periphery of the fire-side gypsum plasterboard, leading to the opening of vertical board joints. In this paper, it was assumed that the shear experiments of screw connections did not consider the effects of the cracking of gypsum plasterboard caused by the flexural deflection of the wall assembly at elevated temperatures. A detailed investigation of 200 monotonic tests was conducted for the screw connections with gypsum sheathing at ambient and elevated temperatures. The specimens were carefully designed to avoid the out-of-plane curling of the CFS coupon. The effects of the loaded edge distance and double layers of sheathing were discussed. The design formulas of some key parameters of screw connections as well as a simplified load–displacement model were developed at ambient and elevated temperatures to provide a reasonable basis for the design and the numerical simulation of CFS walls.

2. Test Program

2.1. Test Device

The shear experiments of CFS screw connections at ambient and elevated temperatures were conducted at Nanjing University of Science and Technology, China. The loading device was an electronic universal material testing machine (Changchun Research Institute for Mechanical Science Co. Ltd, Changchun, China) (Figure 1) with a loading capacity of 50 kN and strong stability at small levels of loading. The heating device (Changchun Research Institute for Mechanical Science Co. Ltd, Changchun, China) was a cylindrical electric furnace (Figure 1) with a cavity diameter of 85 mm and a cavity height of 280 mm. In addition, three type-K thermocouples were arranged around the loaded screw (Figure 2 and Figure 3) of the specimen to ensure that the screw connection maintained the pre-set temperature.

2.2. Specimen Design and Assembly

Limited to the cavity dimensions of the furnace, the single-lap test of the CFS coupon-fastener-sheathing connections (Figure 2 and Figure 3) was adopted in this paper. Compared to the test scheme of multi-screw stud-fastener-sheathing connections [6,7], the loaded sheathing edge of the coupon-fastener-sheathing connection had only one screw. Hence, high accuracy for the specimen assembly was easy to achieve, especially for the loaded edge distance, which might have an important influence on the shear behavior of screw connections with sheathing. According to the AISI design manual [17], the minimum distance of the loaded sheathing edge is 9.5 mm in the United States and 12.5 mm in Canada. Therefore, three loaded edge distances (10, 15 and 20 mm) were considered in the experiments. In addition, single and double layers of 12.5 mm thick fire-resistant gypsum plasterboard were attached to 1.0 mm thick G550 cold-formed steel by self-drilling bugle head screws. The screw diameter was 4.2 mm, which is the minimum size for screw connections of CFS structures in the Chinese design guide [23]. As shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, the lip was designed for the CFS coupon to avoid the out-of-plane curling of CFS sheets that was found in the previous shear experiments of CFS sheet-fastener-sheet connections [19], and this might affect the failure mode of the connections. In addition, two pieces of steel plates (Figure 2b and Figure 3b) were used to grip the CFS coupon to restrict the out-of-plane deflection of CFS coupons at the testing rig.
Before assembly of the screw connection, the gypsum plasterboard needs to be cut into pieces and manually polished to ensure the smoothness of the loaded sheathing edge. Next, small holes were drilled by a 2 mm diameter drill bit for the gypsum plasterboard pieces and the CFS coupon at the location of the loaded screw (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Then, the gypsum plasterboard pieces and CFS coupon were fixed together using a screw to form the screw connection. Finally, the loaded edge distance of the assembled specimen was checked and adjusted by art knife, if necessary. Figure 4a shows a specimen with double layers of gypsum sheathing, and Figure 4b shows the verification of the loaded edge distance (20 mm) for that specimen.

2.3. Test Procedure

The specimen was mounted into the loading machine by gripping the upper end of the specimen and relaxing the bottom end. Then, the furnace was heated to the pre-set temperature and held for 120 min at this constant temperature. Subsequently, the bottom end of the specimen was manually gripped, and a monotonic tension load was gradually applied to the specimen at a constant displacement rate of 0.025 mm/s until failure while maintaining the pre-set temperature.
A total of ten temperature levels were considered in the present experiments, including the ambient temperature (approximately 20 °C) and elevated temperatures from 100 °C to 500 °C at intervals of 50 °C. Based on the previous investigation, the shear experimental results of the screw connection with gypsum sheathing may be more scattered than the tension results of the CFS coupon [7]. In this paper, the shear strength of the connection was taken as the control parameter. A strict rule similar to ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) E2126-11 [24] was made to establish the number of nominally identical specimens for each series, and it is described as follows: (a) each series was started and repeated three times; (b) if the relative error between the strength of the generic specimen and the average strength of the series was less than 10%, the number of specimens for this series was three; (c) otherwise, a fourth test was performed, and if the relative error was less than 15%, the number of specimens for this series was four; and (d) otherwise, the number of specimens for this series was five. Therefore, three to five experiments were conducted for each series, and a total of 200 tests were performed in this study.

3. Test Results

3.1. General

For illustration, all of the specimens were labeled according to the following rule: the first group of characters represent the sheathing material (GPB: gypsum plasterboard); the second group of characters represent the loaded edge distance (10, 15 or 20 mm); the third group describes the number of layers for sheathing (S for single-layer or D for double-layer); and the last group indicates the temperature for the experiment (20 °C (ambient temperature) or 100 °C–500 °C). For instance, GPB20D-20 refers to a specimen with double layers of gypsum plasterboard and a loaded edge distance of 20 mm at ambient temperature. Figure 5 gives the typical load–displacement curve for the specimen GPB20D-20. Table 1 and Table 2 summarize the average results and coefficient of variation (COV) for each series. FmT represents the shear strength of the specimen at T °C; ΔmT is the recorded displacement corresponding to FmT at T °C; ΔuT is the recorded displacement corresponding to 0.8FmT on the post-peak branch of response at T °C; ΔeT is the recorded displacement corresponding to 0.4FmT at T °C; and KeT is the initial shear stiffness of the screw connection at T °C and KeT = 0.4FmT/ΔeT. ET represents the absorbed energy of the connection at T °C, which is the area under the load–displacement curve up to ΔuT. In addition, the characters for the failure mode in Table 1 and Table 2 were grouped as follows: B represents the breaking of the loaded sheathing edge (Figure 6a); T represents the screw tilting (Figure 7c); and F represents the flexing fracture of the sheathing (Figure 7c). For instance, B/B + T indicates the breaking of the loaded sheathing edge alone or combined with screw tilting. In Table 1 and Table 2, the scatter of the test results is significant, except for FmT. Both FmT and KeT of the screw connection decreased with increasing temperatures. However, KeT of some series at 100 °C (for instance, GPB20S-100 and GPB15D-100) became much higher than that of the series at ambient temperature, and ΔmT of the series at 100 °C became much lower than those of the series at ambient temperature and 150 °C. No reasonable explanation is currently offered for such a phenomenon. Moreover, Table 1 and Table 2 show that the shear strength of the double-layer sheathing connection was higher than but not twice that of the shear strength of the single-layer sheathing connection. Therefore, the linear superposition method is not applicable, which should be taken into consideration in the design of CFS walls with double-layer sheathing. The effect of double-layer sheathing is discussed separately in this paper.

3.2. Visual Observation

For the single-layer gypsum sheathing connections at ambient temperature, cracks first appeared along the thickness of the loaded sheathing edge. With increasing deflection, the cracks grew on the gypsum surface around the loaded screw (Figure 6) until losing the shearing capacity of the screw connection.
The failure process for the double-layer sheathing connection was different from that of the single-layer sheathing connection at ambient temperature. Cracking first appeared on the loaded sheathing edge of the base layer plasterboard (Figure 7a) because the base layer gypsum plasterboard was subjected to the bearing of the screw hole–wall oriented towards the loaded sheathing edge. The bearing of the screw hole–wall for the face layer gypsum plasterboard was oriented towards the field of sheathing. Following the crack propagation, failure of the base layer plasterboard (Figure 7b) occurred while the face layer plasterboard still had not lost its bearing capacity. Therefore, the deflection capacity of the double-layer sheathing connection is much higher than that of the single-layer sheathing connection, as shown in Figure 8.
For the connection series at elevated temperatures, the off-test inspection indicated that the color of the paper facing on the gypsum plasterboard remained stable below 150 °C (Figure 9a and Figure 10a) and gradually changed to light gray (200 °C, Figure 9b and Figure 10b), black (250 °C, Figure 9c and Figure 10c), off-white (400 °C, Figure 9f and Figure 10f) and white (450 °C, Figure 9g and Figure 10g) with increasing temperature. In addition, the paper facing on the gypsum plasterboard maintained integrity below 250 °C and significantly cracked at 300 °C (Figure 9d and Figure 10d). Beyond 350 °C (Figure 9e and Figure 10e), the paper facing on the gypsum plasterboard began to fall off. Therefore, the sharp degeneration of the shear strength of the connection series at 150 °C (Table 1 and Table 2) was likely due to the dehydration of the gypsum, and the effect of the paper facing on the shear behavior of the connection became insignificant beyond 300 °C.

3.3. Failure Mechanisms

For the connection series with single-layer gypsum sheathing, all of the specimens demonstrated the breaking of the loaded sheathing edge at ambient and elevated temperatures (Figure 6 and Figure 9). In addition, a slight tilting of the screw was found in some specimens in the GBP20S-20 series due to the improved shear strength from increasing the loaded edge distance from 15 mm to 20 mm. However, the screw tilting disappeared beyond 100 °C because of the degenerated shear strength of the connections at elevated temperatures.
For the connection series with double-layer gypsum sheathing, the double length of the screw arm, which is the perpendicular distance from the screw’s bugle head to the CFS coupon, resulted in the occurrence of screw tilting at a low shear load. With increasing screw tilt, the loaded sheathing edge suffers additional out-of-plane bending. Therefore, except for the breaking of the loaded sheathing edge, the connection series with the double-layer gypsum sheathing also displayed obvious screw tilting and sheathing flexing fraction at ambient temperature (Figure 7). Again, the screw tilting and sheathing flexing fraction disappear gradually at elevated temperatures (Figure 10) due to the degenerated shear strength.

3.4. Effect of the Loaded Edge Distance

Figure 11 shows the ratio of the test results of the fastener series with a loaded sheathing edge of 15 or 20 mm to those of the series with a loaded sheathing edge of 10 mm at the same temperature. Figure 11a reveals that the connection shear strength increases with increasing loaded edge distance at ambient and elevated temperatures. For the single-layer sheathing connection, the shear strength became approximately 1.4 to 2.1 times of that of GPB10S by increasing the edge distance from 10 to 20 mm; when the loaded edge distance increased from 10 to 15 mm, the shear strength increased by approximately 1.1 to 1.6 times, except at 400 °C. For the double-layer sheathing connection, increasing the loaded edge distance from 10 to 20 mm increased the shear strength by approximately 1.3 to 2.3 times. The shear strength of GPB15D was very close to that of GPB10D from 250 °C to 450 °C. At other temperatures, the shear strength was approximately 1.1 to 1.3 times greater by increasing the loaded edge distance from 10 to 15 mm. Moreover, it should be noticed that the effect of the loaded edge distance on the connection shear strength would become insignificant when it was long enough. In this case, the connection failure mode would likely become screw pull-through.
Although significant scatter existed in the other test results, some basic findings are clear: (a) the absorbed energy of the connection increases with increasing loaded edge distance at ambient and elevated temperatures, as shown in Figure 11b; and (b) the effect of the loaded edge distance on the initial connection stiffness is insignificant at room temperature; the initial stiffness of GPB15D is close to that of GPB10D at elevated temperatures; and for other series, the initial stiffness also increased with increasing loaded edge distance beyond 100 °C, as shown in Figure 11c.

3.5. Effect of the Double-Layer Gypsum Sheathing

Figure 12 shows the ratio of the test results of the fastener series with double-layer sheathing to those of the series with single-layer sheathing. In Figure 12a, except for the GPB20 series at 400 °C and GPB15 at 450 °C, the shear strength of the other series increased when replacing the single-layer sheathing with double layers of gypsum plasterboard. Most of the ratios for the shear strength fell between 1.2 and 1.6. In Figure 12b, the absorbed energy capacity of the connection with double layers of gypsum plasterboard was much higher than that of the connection with single-layer sheathing. Most of the ratios for the absorbed energy were above 2.0. Moreover, replacing single-layer gypsum sheathing with a double layer of gypsum plasterboard had an insignificant effect on the initial connection stiffness at ambient temperature, but the effect became favorable beyond 100 °C with an average ratio of approximately 1.5.

4. Design of CFS Screw Connection with Gypsum Sheathing

4.1. Shear Strength Design

Based on the all-steel design method of CFS wall studs in AISI S100-2012 [1], the bearing capacity of a wall stud with small slenderness can be determined by the shear strength of the screw connection with sheathing. In addition, the degeneration of the lateral performance of a CFS wall is usually caused by the shear failure of screw connections [15,16]. The current AISI design manual [25] gives the maximum nominal load per screw connection with gypsum sheathing at ambient temperature. However, the effects of the loaded sheathing edge, double-layer sheathing and elevated temperatures were not yet considered. Therefore, for CFS walls with double-layer gypsum sheathing or increased loaded edge distance, both the axial and lateral design could be overly conservative. This paper recommends including the favorable effects of the loaded sheathing edge and double-layer sheathing on the shear behavior of the screw connection at ambient and elevated temperatures based on reliable construction.
A unified prediction formula for FmT was proposed by non-linear regression, as shown in Equation (1), where d represents the loaded edge distance; α is the coefficient that considers the effect of double-layer gypsum sheathing at ambient temperature, as shown in Equations (2) and (3); and RmT is the reduction factor of shear strength, defined as the ratio of the shear strength at elevated temperatures to that at ambient temperature. RmT is developed by the multi-segment polynomials, as shown in Equation (4). The values of the coefficients in Equation (4) are given in Table 3. Based on the previous thermal physical experiments of fire-resistant gypsum plasterboard at elevated temperatures [21], the dehydration of gypsum plasterboard (CaSO4·2H2O) occurred from approximately 85 °C to 160 °C. Therefore, RmT is assumed to be 1.0 for temperatures below 80 °C in Table 3. The RmT predicted by Equation (4) is in good agreement with the values obtained from the present experiments, as shown in Figure 13.
F m T = 316 e 0.04 d α R m T , 10 d 20   mm
where the units of FmT are N.
For single-layer gypsum sheathing,
α = 1.0
For double-layer gypsum sheathing,
α = 0.0028 d 2 0.085 d + 1.98 , 10 d 20   mm
R m T = a T 2 + b T + c
where a, b and c are the coefficients of Equation (4).
Figure 14 compares the values of FmT predicted by Equation (1) to those obtained from the present 200 experiments. The average ratio of the predicted FmT to the experimental results is 98.8%, and the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient is 0.995. Thus, Equation (1) is able to accurately evaluate the shear strength of the screw connection with single- or double-layer gypsum sheathing and different edge distances at ambient and elevated temperatures. In structural engineering design, if the loaded edge distance exceeds 20 mm, Equation (1) can still be used with the loaded edge distance of 20 mm to obtain a conservative prediction of the shear strength of the screw connection, and a factor of safety [25] can be applied to the maximum allowable axial strength of the screw connection, as shown in Equation (5).
F a T = F m T / Ω
where FaT is the maximum allowable axial strength of the screw connection with sheathing and Ω is the factor of safety for the screw connection [25].

4.2. Other Parameters

Some other screw connection parameters were also considered, including keT, ΔmT and ΔuT. Because the scatter is significant, fitting these parameters focused on the simplicity of operation and conservation instead of accuracy. The prediction formula of the initial screw connection stiffness at ambient and elevated temperatures is given in Equation (6). RkT is the reduction factor of the initial stiffness defined as the ratio of the initial stiffness at elevated temperatures to that at ambient temperature. The values of RkT are shown in Table 4, and they did not consider the sudden increase in initial stiffness at 100 °C (Table 1 and Table 2). Figure 15 compares the predicted RkT to the test results at ambient and elevated temperatures. In most cases, the keT values obtained from Equation (6) are conservative and easy for operation.
k e T = R k T 1000
where the units of keT are N/mm.
Equation (7) is the prediction formula of ΔmT, which takes the larger value of of FmT/keT and α1·Δ1T. FmT and keT can be obtained from Equations (1) and (6), respectively. Δ1T is the predicted displacement corresponding to FmT for the screw connection with single-layer gypsum sheathing at T °C. Figure 16 gives the values of the predicted Δ1T based on the present experiments. α1 is the coefficient that considers the effect of double-layer gypsum sheathing on ΔmT, as shown in Equations (8) and (9). As shown in Table 2, the test results of ΔmT for the connection series with double-layer gypsum sheathing and a loaded edge distance of 20 mm were much lower than those of the series with double-layer gypsum sheathing and a loaded edge distance of 15 or 10 mm for temperatures beyond 250 °C. This phenomenon seems unusual, and it was not considered in Equation (9).
Δ m T = max ( F m T / k e T , α 1 Δ 1 T )
where the units of ΔmT and Δ1T are mm.
For single-layer gypsum sheathing,
α1 = 1.0
For double-layer gypsum sheathing,
α1 = 1.3
In addition, the prediction formula of ΔuT was also given, as shown in Equation (10). α2 is the additional coefficient that considers the effect of double-layer gypsum sheathing on ΔuT at elevated temperatures, as shown in Equations (11) and (12).
Δ u T = 1.5 α 2 Δ m T
where the units of ΔuT are mm.
For single-layer gypsum sheathing,
α2 = 1.0
For double-layer gypsum sheathing,
α2 = 1.0, T ≤ 200 °C and α2 = 1.6, T > 200 °C

4.3. Load–Displacement Model of the Screw Connections

The load–displacement curves of the screw connections at ambient and elevated temperatures are important input parameters for the elaborate simulation of the mechanical performance of CFS walls at ambient temperature or in fire conditions. A four-line degradation model was adopted by Ye et al. [9] to predict the load–displacement curve of the connection at ambient temperature. However, the four-line degradation model has at least eight parameters, and it is not easy to operate. The Foschi exponential model [10] can also be used to describe the load–displacement characteristic of the connection at room temperature, but it becomes inconvenient at elevated temperatures due to its irregular change in parameters. Based on the above prediction formulas for FmT, KeT, ΔmT and ΔuT, a simplified load–displacement model with the post-peak branch was developed for the screw connection at both ambient and elevated temperatures, as shown in Equation (13). The pre-peak branch of the load–displacement model was obtained by modifying the Ramberg-Osgood model [26]. The post-peak branch showed a linear decrease from ΔmT to ΔuT. To simplify the operation, the exponent A in Equation (13) was given a constant value for the fastener series with the same configuration and elevated temperature, as shown in Table 5.
Δ T = { ( Δ m T F m T k e T ) ( F T F m T ) A + F T k e T , F T F m T   and   Δ T Δ m T 5 Δ u T 4 Δ m T 5 Δ u T 5 Δ m T F m T F T , Δ m T < Δ T Δ u T   and   F u T F T < F m T
where ΔT is the connection displacement at T °C and FT is the connection shear load at T °C.
Taking the screw connection with the loaded edge distance of 15 mm as an example, Figure 17 compares the load–displacement curves predicted by Equation (13) to the experimental results. All of the key parameters in Equation (13), including FmT, KeT, ΔmT and ΔuT, were obtained from the present prediction formulas (Equation (1) through Equations (4) and (6) through Equation (12)). The present load–displacement model can provide a reasonable estimate of the load–displacement response of the screw connection at ambient and elevated temperatures with acceptable accuracy and simple operation. In some cases, visible differences exist between the predicted curves and the experimental results, such as the load–displacement curve of the screw connection with single-layer gypsum sheathing at 500 °C (Figure 17a). This difference is due to the errors of the predicted KeT, ΔmT and ΔuT, which are inevitable due to the significant scatter of these parameters in the experiments.

5. Conclusions

This paper reported a detailed study of 200 monotonic tests of CFS screw connections with gypsum sheathing at both ambient and elevated temperatures. Three loaded edge distances and single- or double-layer gypsum sheathing were taken into account in the experiments. The following conclusions are drawn from this work:
(1)
The failure characteristic of the screw connections with double-layer gypsum sheathing in shear was different from that of single-layer gypsum sheathing connections at ambient temperature, and it could be described as the breaking of the loaded sheathing edge combined with significant screw tilting and loaded sheathing edge flexing fracture. The screw tilting and loaded sheathing edge flexing fracture disappear gradually at elevated temperatures.
(2)
Compared to the shear strength at ambient temperature, the shear strength of screw connection decreased sharply at 150 °C and 200 °C due to the gypsum dehydration and gradually declined from 250 °C to 500 °C.
(3)
The initial screw connection stiffness seems irrelevant to the loaded edge distance of more than 10 mm and single- or double-layer gypsum sheathing at ambient temperature. The shear strength and absorbed energy of the screw connection were significantly enhanced by increasing the loaded edge distance from 10 mm to 20 mm or replacing the single-layer gypsum sheathing with double-layer sheathing at both ambient and elevated temperatures.
(4)
The shear strength of screw connection could not be linearly superposed by the number of layers of gypsum sheathing because the shear strength of screw connection with double-layer gypsum sheathing is less than twice the screw connection strength with single-layer gypsum sheathing at ambient and elevated temperatures.
(5)
A unified design formula for the screw connection shear strength at ambient and elevated temperatures was proposed with sufficient accuracy, and it takes into account the effect of the loaded edge distance and double-layer gypsum sheathing. In addition, a simplified load–displacement model with the post-peak branch was developed to evaluate the load–displacement response of the screw connection with different loaded edge distances and single- or double-layer gypsum sheathing at ambient and elevated temperatures.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51508088); Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (Grant No. BK20150605); the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Key Laboratory of Building Fire Protection Engineering and Technology of MPS (Grant No. KFKT2015ZD05); Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Environmental Impact and Structural Safety in Engineering (Grant No. JSKL2014K04); and Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Structure Engineering (Grant No. ZD1402). The authors thank Xu Zhihong and Dong Xuehua for their kind assistance during the experiments.

Author Contributions

Wei Chen contributed to design and conduct the experiments, perform the data analyses and write the manuscript; Jihong Ye contributed to the conception of the study; Tao Chen contributed to provide the test device and discuss the results.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. American Iron and Steel Institute. AISI-S100-12 (North American Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members); American Iron and Steel Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yu, W.W.; LaBoube, R.A. Cold-Formed Steel Design, 4th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  3. Serrette, R.L.; Encalada, J.; Juadines, M.; Nguyen, H. Static racking behavior of plywood, OSB, gypsum, and fiberboard walls with metal framing. J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 1997, 123, 1079–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fülöp, L.A.; Dubina, D. Design criteria for seam and sheeting to framing connections of cold-formed steel shear panels. J. Struct. Eng. 2006, 132, 582–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nithyadharan, M.; Kalyanaraman, V. Experimental study of screw connections in CFS-calcium silicate board wall panels. Thin Walled Struct. 2011, 49, 724–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fiorino, L.; Della Corte, G.; Landolfo, R. Experimental tests on typical screw connections for cold-formed steel housing. Eng. Struct. 2007, 29, 1761–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Peterman, K.D.; Nakata, N.; Schafer, B.W. Hysteretic characterization of cold-formed steel stud-to-sheathing connections. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2014, 101, 254–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Swensen, S.; Deierlein G, G.; Miranda, E. Behavior of screw and adhesive connections to gypsum wallboard in wood and cold-formed steel-framed Wallettes. J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 2015, 142, E4015002-1–E4015002-11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ye, J.H.; Wang, X.X.; Zhao, M.Y. Experimental study on shear behavior of screw connections in CFS sheathing. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2016, 121, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Foschi, R.O. Load-slip characteristics of nails. Wood Sci. 1974, 7, 69–76. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dowell, R.K.; Seibel, F.; Wilson, E.L. Pivot hysteresis model for reinforced concrete members. ACI Struct. J. 1998, 95, 607–617. [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, W.; Ye, J.H.; Bai, Y.; Zhao, X.L. Improved fire resistant performance of load bearing cold-formed steel interior and exterior wall systems. Thin Walled Struct. 2013, 73, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, W.; Ye, J.H.; Bai, Y.; Zhao, X.L. Full-Scale fire experiments on load-bearing cold-formed steel walls lined with different panels. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2012, 79, 242–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sakumoto, Y.; Hirakawa, T.; Masuda, H.; Nakamura, K. Fire resistance of walls and floors using light-gauge steel shapes. J. Struct. Eng. 2003, 129, 1522–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, X.X.; Ye, J.H. Cyclic testing of two- and three-story CFS shear-walls with reinforced end studs. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2016, 121, 13–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ye, J.H.; Wang, X.X.; Jia, H.Y.; Zhao, M.Y. Cyclic performance of cold-formed steel shear walls sheathed with double-layer wallboards on both sides. Thin Walled Struct. 2015, 92, 146–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. American Iron and Steel Institute. AISI-S400-15 (North American Standard for Seismic Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Systems); American Iron and Steel Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lu, W.; Mäkeläinen, P.; Outinen, J.; Ma, Z. Design of screwed steel sheeting connection at ambient and elevated temperatures. Thin Walled Struct. 2011, 49, 1526–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yan, S.; Young, B. Screwed connections of thin sheet steels at elevated temperatures—Part I: Steady state tests. Eng. Struct. 2012, 35, 234–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cai, Y.C.; Young, B. Behavior of cold-formed stainless steel single shear bolted connections at elevated temperatures. Thin Walled Struct. 2014, 75, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Chen, W.; Ye, J.H.; Bai, Y.; Zhao, X.L. Thermal and mechanical modeling of load-bearing cold-formed steel wall systems in fire. J. Struct. Eng. 2014, 140, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gunalan, S.; Mahendran, M. Finite element modelling of load bearing cold-formed steel wall systems under fire conditions. Eng. Struct. 2013, 56, 1007–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. China Institute of Building Standard Design & Research. Technical Specification for Low-Rise Cold-Formed Thin-Walled Steel Buildings; China Architecture & Building Press: Beijing, China, 2012. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  24. American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM Standard E2126-11 (Standard Test Methods for Cyclic (Reversed) Load Test for Shear Resistance of Vertical Elements of the Lateral Force Resisting Systems for Buildings); American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  25. American Iron and Steel Institute. AISI-S211-07 (North American Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Framing—Wall Stud Design); American Iron and Steel Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ramberg, W.; Osgood, W.R. Description of Stress-Strain Curves by Three Parameters. Patent NACA-TN-902, 1 July 1943. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Test system for the experiments.
Figure 1. Test system for the experiments.
Applsci 06 00248 g001
Figure 2. Connection details with double-layer sheathing and a loaded edge distance of 15 mm: (a) front view; and (b) side view.
Figure 2. Connection details with double-layer sheathing and a loaded edge distance of 15 mm: (a) front view; and (b) side view.
Applsci 06 00248 g002
Figure 3. Connection details with single-layer sheathing and a loaded edge distance of 15 mm: (a) front view; and (b) side view.
Figure 3. Connection details with single-layer sheathing and a loaded edge distance of 15 mm: (a) front view; and (b) side view.
Applsci 06 00248 g003
Figure 4. A typical screw connection specimen: (a) side view; and (b) verification of the loaded edge distance (20 mm).
Figure 4. A typical screw connection specimen: (a) side view; and (b) verification of the loaded edge distance (20 mm).
Applsci 06 00248 g004
Figure 5. Typical load–displacement curve of (gypsum plasterboard) GPB20D-20.
Figure 5. Typical load–displacement curve of (gypsum plasterboard) GPB20D-20.
Applsci 06 00248 g005
Figure 6. Breaking of the loaded sheathing edge for GPB15S-20: (a) front view; and (b) side view.
Figure 6. Breaking of the loaded sheathing edge for GPB15S-20: (a) front view; and (b) side view.
Applsci 06 00248 g006
Figure 7. The failure process of GPB20D-20: (a) cracking of the base layer gypsum plasterboard on the loaded edge; (b) failure of the base layer gypsum plasterboard; and (c) B + T + F failure.
Figure 7. The failure process of GPB20D-20: (a) cracking of the base layer gypsum plasterboard on the loaded edge; (b) failure of the base layer gypsum plasterboard; and (c) B + T + F failure.
Applsci 06 00248 g007
Figure 8. Load–displacement curves of the connection series at ambient temperature.
Figure 8. Load–displacement curves of the connection series at ambient temperature.
Applsci 06 00248 g008
Figure 9. Failure modes of GPB15S series at elevated temperatures: (a) 150 °C; (b) 200 °C; (c) 250 °C; (d) 300 °C; (e) 350 °C; (f) 400 °C; (g) 450 °C; and (h) 500 °C.
Figure 9. Failure modes of GPB15S series at elevated temperatures: (a) 150 °C; (b) 200 °C; (c) 250 °C; (d) 300 °C; (e) 350 °C; (f) 400 °C; (g) 450 °C; and (h) 500 °C.
Applsci 06 00248 g009
Figure 10. Failure modes of GPB20D series at elevated temperatures: (a) 150 °C; (b) 200 °C; (c) 250 °C; (d) 300 °C; (e) 350 °C; (f) 400 °C; (g) 450 °C; and (h) 500 °C.
Figure 10. Failure modes of GPB20D series at elevated temperatures: (a) 150 °C; (b) 200 °C; (c) 250 °C; (d) 300 °C; (e) 350 °C; (f) 400 °C; (g) 450 °C; and (h) 500 °C.
Applsci 06 00248 g010aApplsci 06 00248 g010b
Figure 11. Effect of the loaded edge distance: (a) ratio of shear strength; (b) ratio of absorbed energy; and (c) ratio of initial stiffness.
Figure 11. Effect of the loaded edge distance: (a) ratio of shear strength; (b) ratio of absorbed energy; and (c) ratio of initial stiffness.
Applsci 06 00248 g011
Figure 12. Effect of double-layer gypsum sheathing: (a) ratio of shear strength; (b) ratio of absorbed energy; and (c) ratio of initial stiffness.
Figure 12. Effect of double-layer gypsum sheathing: (a) ratio of shear strength; (b) ratio of absorbed energy; and (c) ratio of initial stiffness.
Applsci 06 00248 g012
Figure 13. Comparison of RmT obtained from Equation (4) and experimental results: (a) single-layer gypsum; and (b) double-layer gypsum sheathing.
Figure 13. Comparison of RmT obtained from Equation (4) and experimental results: (a) single-layer gypsum; and (b) double-layer gypsum sheathing.
Applsci 06 00248 g013
Figure 14. Predicted shear strength compared to experimental results.
Figure 14. Predicted shear strength compared to experimental results.
Applsci 06 00248 g014
Figure 15. Predicted initial stiffness compared to the experimental results.
Figure 15. Predicted initial stiffness compared to the experimental results.
Applsci 06 00248 g015
Figure 16. Predicted values of Δ1T.
Figure 16. Predicted values of Δ1T.
Applsci 06 00248 g016
Figure 17. Comparison of the predicted load–displacement curves to the experimental results: (a) screw connection with single-layer gypsum sheathing and a loaded edge distance of 15 mm; and (b) screw connection with double-layer gypsum sheathing and a loaded edge distance of 15 mm.
Figure 17. Comparison of the predicted load–displacement curves to the experimental results: (a) screw connection with single-layer gypsum sheathing and a loaded edge distance of 15 mm; and (b) screw connection with double-layer gypsum sheathing and a loaded edge distance of 15 mm.
Applsci 06 00248 g017aApplsci 06 00248 g017b
Table 1. Experimental results of CFS screw connection with single-layer gypsum sheathing.
Table 1. Experimental results of CFS screw connection with single-layer gypsum sheathing.
SpecimenkeT (N/mm)FmT (N)ΔeT (mm)ΔmT (mm)ΔuT (mm)ET (N·mm)Failure Mode
MeanCOVMeanCOVMeanCOVMeanCOVMeanCOVMeanCOV
GPB10S-20121539.0%4714.9%0.17546.0%0.72020.2%1.2743.4%43910.3%B
GPB10S-100118936.0%3853.8%0.14340.8%0.45737.4%0.87731.5%25128.5%
GPB10S-1504956.7%2208.0%0.17913.7%0.81025.1%1.30516.0%21820.7%
GPB10S-2005352.2%1705.4%0.1277.6%0.45236.3%1.05224.8%13932.7%
GPB10S-25044019.6%1447.3%0.13313.8%0.6077.8%1.2828.2%15012.9%
GPB10S-30031715.3%1221.7%0.15618.3%0.6037.2%1.0956.4%1029.3%
GPB10S-35025310.1%978.2%0.15018.9%0.5004.5%0.8135.9%5612.7%
GPB10S-40024020.6%10710.4%0.18111.4%0.65719.4%0.91822.6%7135.7%
GPB10S-4501856.5%826.1%0.17310.6%0.58120.0%0.72818.3%3924.6%
GPB10S-5001817.3%748.8%0.1584.5%0.49216.7%0.76525.7%3825.0%
GPB15S-2085717.3%5653.4%0.26813.4%0.95818.1%1.4067.7%5724.8%B
GPB15S-10096219.2%4734.2%0.20223.2%0.61416.1%0.81615.2%25112.3%
GPB15S-1505303.7%3267.0%0.2538.0%0.72511.8%1.01813.0%22616.2%
GPB15S-20059223.2%2023.8%0.14329.2%0.56241.7%1.00639.2%16740.3%
GPB15S-2504087.8%1618.1%0.15916.1%0.57430.8%0.95435.9%11445.4%
GPB15S-30038611.8%1617.8%0.17020.1%0.59321.8%1.03216.1%12420.8%
GPB15S-35034712.5%1407.6%0.16418.6%0.54010.8%0.9548.5%10114.8%
GPB15S-4003018.7%1098.3%0.1452.9%0.4175.1%0.5320.3%3710.4%
GPB15S-45032910.1%1326.8%0.16311.3%0.50211.1%0.64015.9%5519.9%
GPB15S-50031420.4%1039.2%0.13634.3%0.40324.9%0.49622.0%3426.0%
GPB20S-20100423.4%7114.5%0.29217.6%1.24317.8%1.67214.5%87111.1%B/B + T
GPB20S-100180628.5%6371.6%0.15032.8%0.51118.0%0.70518.7%30720.2%B
GPB20S-1506060.3%3796.9%0.2507.1%0.8966.8%1.23219.3%31823.4%
GPB20S-20067118.6%2705.1%0.16520.9%0.59329.1%0.79229.0%14538.9%
GPB20S-25059518.6%2012.8%0.13921.6%0.61712.8%1.0036.3%1564.8%
GPB20S-30053615.3%2192.3%0.17818.7%0.6604.6%1.0487.1%1707.9%
GPB20S-35050013.3%1828.6%0.14820.4%0.55850.3%0.83256.2%10971.7%
GPB20S-40046818.1%2179.9%0.18921.8%0.64019.6%0.92120.3%14133.1%
GPB20S-4503583.5%1773.4%0.1980.4%0.5554.3%0.64511.1%7016.1%
GPB20S-50029511.2%1463.8%0.20718.2%0.6132.7%0.7192.4%624.3%
COV, coefficient of variation; CFS, cold-formed steel; GPB, gypsum plasterboard.
Table 2. Experimental results of CFS screw connection with double-layer gypsum sheathing.
Table 2. Experimental results of CFS screw connection with double-layer gypsum sheathing.
SpecimenkeT (N/mm)FmT (N)ΔeT (mm)ΔmT (mm)ΔuT (mm)ET (N·mm)Failure Mode
MeanCOVMeanCOVMeanCOVMeanMeanCOVmeanCOVMean
GPB10D-2010923.5%6631.9%0.2432.9%0.9748.5%1.4806.9%7406.6%B + T + F
GPB10D-100125117.7%5602.5%0.18215.9%0.6555.6%0.9623.2%3834.2%B
GPB10D-15063819.7%3216.4%0.20722.2%1.12213`.3%1.6588.6%40811.9%
GPB10D-20071415.3%26211.1%0.14917.5%0.75527.7%1.67416.2%35715.5%
GPB10D-2507749.4%2263.3%0.11812.8%0.99931.2%2.00226.8%37730.8%
GPB10D-30064822.0%1975.1%0.12622.3%1.01613.4%2.0464.3%3394.4%
GPB10D-35052712.6%2094.3%0.16115.1%1.15129.9%2.02820.5%35122.0%
GPB10D-40054615.8%14510.0%0.10710.9%0.79839.3%1.57013.2%19324.1%
GPB10D-45032918.0%1196.9%0.14923.0%0.58442.4%1.2133.2%1121.4%
GPB10D-50025012.8%885.6%0.1445.9%0.72832.1%1.21535.0%8748.6%
GPB15D-20104124.1%7533.5%0.29818.3%1.3278.7%1.9084.0%10793.6%B + T + F
GPB15D-100134810.4%6811.7%0.20411.8%0.7708.3%1.00313.6%47915.5%B + T + F
GPB15D-15068816.8%4435.2%0.26111.9%0.84915.3%1.63630.9%51528.2%B
GPB15D-20067110.6%3049.8%0.18816.9%0.49214.6%1.3689.0%3065.5%
GPB15D-25067012.5%2297.5%0.1375.5%0.99914.3%2.34814.0%46920.2%
GPB15D-30070619.3%1913.5%0.11224.8%1.21241.1%2.66910.4%44211.1%
GPB15D-35061334.7%2078.6%0.15038.4%0.83929.7%1.95919.0%34424.3%
GPB15D-40041214.0%1447.4%0.14216.9%0.74581.6%1.97142.9%21742.9%
GPB15D-45032312.6%1179.1%0.14614.4%0.79136.4%1.38825.9%13030.7%
GPB15D-50031812.5%1123.1%0.14214.7%0.79628.6%2.20460.1%20968.7%
GPB20D-20104120.2%9983.3%0.39420.2%1.65310.8%2.38212.0%179117.3%B + T + F
GPB20D-10014585.9%9285.5%0.25510.3%0.97121.5%1.3044.6%8579.4%B + T + F
GPB20D-15087013.9%6945.6%0.32620.5%1.57317.5%1.93810.0%94915.9%B + T + F
GPB20D-2008647.7%4644.8%0.21612.1%0.69514.9%1.0039.3%31810.0%B
GPB20D-25098713.0%3163.2%0.13016.8%0.50823.8%2.44415.1%62810.8%
GPB20D-3007577.1%3049.7%0.16216.8%0.54535.2%2.69316.0%68620.3%
GPB20D-35079522.4%27113.0%0.13913.0%0.6285.5%1.42017.4%32118.2%
GPB20D-40065010.2%1949.4%0.12012.3%0.57017.3%1.87311.3%31011.2%
GPB20D-4504596.6%1878.2%0.16414.4%0.44017.4%0.84627.7%11031.4%
GPB20D-5004139.2%15810.4%0.15417.6%0.40512.3%0.95526.3%10923.7%
Table 3. Values of Coefficients in Equation (4).
Table 3. Values of Coefficients in Equation (4).
SheathingTemperature (°C)Edge Distance of 10 mmEdge Distance of 15 mmEdge Distance of 20 mm
abcabcabc
Single-layer gypsum20 ≤ T ≤ 80001001001
80 < T ≤ 2502.73 × 10−5−1.32 × 10−21.8812 × 10−5−1.08 × 10−21.7372 × 10−5−1.08 × 10−21.737
250 < T ≤ 5000−4.4 × 10−43.97 × 10−10−4.4 × 10−43.97 × 10−10−4.4 × 10−43.97 × 10−1
Double-layer gypsum20 ≤ T ≤ 80001001001
80 < T ≤ 2502.58 × 10−5−1.266 × 10−21.8471.65 × 10−5−9.6 × 10−31.6630−4.15 × 10−31.332
250 < T ≤ 5000−6 × 10−44.445 × 10−10−6 × 10−44.445 × 10−10−6 × 10−44.445 × 10−1
Table 4. Values of RkT in Equation (6).
Table 4. Values of RkT in Equation (6).
SheathingEdge Distance (mm)Temperature (°C)
≤100 °C150 °C500 °C
Single-layer gypsum10 ≤ d ≤ 15100%50%20%
d ≥ 20100%60%30%
Double-layer gypsum10 ≤ d ≤ 15100%70%30%
d ≥ 20100%90%40%
Note: Values of RkT at other temperatures can be obtained by linear interpolation.
Table 5. Values of the exponent A in Equation (13).
Table 5. Values of the exponent A in Equation (13).
SheathingEdge Distance (mm)A
Single-layer gypsumd = 104
d ≥ 1518
Double-layer gypsumd = 1010
d ≥ 1518
Note: If d lies between 10 and 15 mm, the values of A can be obtained by linear interpolation.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, W.; Ye, J.; Chen, T. Design of Cold-Formed Steel Screw Connections with Gypsum Sheathing at Ambient and Elevated Temperatures. Appl. Sci. 2016, 6, 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6090248

AMA Style

Chen W, Ye J, Chen T. Design of Cold-Formed Steel Screw Connections with Gypsum Sheathing at Ambient and Elevated Temperatures. Applied Sciences. 2016; 6(9):248. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6090248

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Wei, Jihong Ye, and Tao Chen. 2016. "Design of Cold-Formed Steel Screw Connections with Gypsum Sheathing at Ambient and Elevated Temperatures" Applied Sciences 6, no. 9: 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/app6090248

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop