Next Article in Journal
Natural and Activated Allophane Catalytic Activity Based on the Microactivity Test in Astm Norm 3907/D3907M-2019
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimizing Extreme Learning Machines Using Chains of Salps for Efficient Android Ransomware Detection
Previous Article in Journal
Biomechanical Evaluation of Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Fixation Techniques in Mandibular Setback
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Overview on the Latest Nature-Inspired and Metaheuristics-Based Image Registration Algorithms
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Novel Approach against Sun Glare to Enhance Driver Safety

Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(9), 3032; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10093032
by Vlad-Ilie Ungureanu *, Răzvan-Cătălin Miclea, Adrian Korodi and Ioan Silea
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(9), 3032; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10093032
Submission received: 30 March 2020 / Revised: 23 April 2020 / Accepted: 24 April 2020 / Published: 26 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligence Systems and Sensors)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The article is on an interesting topic, such as trying to solve with intelligent systems the safety problem caused by glare. The article is generally well written and structured. Below are my comments.

One major comment is that, being only a simulation rather than an on-road study, the time lag between the different stages of the experiment cannot be observed and that there could be different issues in the application of such sensor in the real world (e.g., weather, obstacles, etc.). Please discuss this point.

I have also some additional minor comments:

  • The format of references in the text is sometimes ankward (e.g., "the paper [X]", the journal [Y]"). And in the references section as well.
  • I see some unnecessary emphasis in describing commercial articles (i.e., lines 130-156).
  • Language should be revised in some points (e.g., only one example: "can be obtain" instead of "can be obtained" at line 162).
  • When recalling Equation, it should be written something like: see Eq. X, or y (putting only the number of the equation in parenthesis may be confused with literature studies).

Author Response

Thank you for the review. The comments were very helpful to us in improving the quality of our manuscript.

Please see the attachment for our point-by-point response.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Please see the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for the review. The comments were very helpful to us in improving the quality of our manuscript.

Please see the attachment for our point-by-point response.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop