Rethinking Women’s Leadership Development: Voices from the Trenches
AbstractAs recent graduates of a women’s-only leadership development program in higher education in the United States, we used autoethnography as a research methodology to provide critical insight into effective women’s leadership programming and evaluation. The potential of this methodology as both a learning process and product helped elucidate two key findings: (1) to effectively develop women leaders, work must be done at the personal, interpersonal, and organizational levels, as these levels are interrelated and interdependent; and (2) women’s multiple identities must be engaged. Therefore, relationship-building should be a central learning outcome and facilitated through program curricula, pedagogical methods, and evaluation. Including autoethnography as a program evaluation methodology fills a gap in the literature on leadership development, and supports our goal of making meaning of our personal experiences in order to enhance women’s leadership development. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Selzer, R.; Howton, A.; Wallace, F. Rethinking Women’s Leadership Development: Voices from the Trenches. Adm. Sci. 2017, 7, 18.
Selzer R, Howton A, Wallace F. Rethinking Women’s Leadership Development: Voices from the Trenches. Administrative Sciences. 2017; 7(2):18.Chicago/Turabian Style
Selzer, Robin; Howton, Amy; Wallace, Felicia. 2017. "Rethinking Women’s Leadership Development: Voices from the Trenches." Adm. Sci. 7, no. 2: 18.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.