Next Article in Journal
Food Addiction, Binge Eating Disorder, and Obesity: Is There a Relationship?
Previous Article in Journal
FITNET’s Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Is Ineffective and May Impede Natural Recovery in Adolescents with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. A Review
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Behav. Sci. 2017, 7(3), 53; doi:10.3390/bs7030053

Four Bad Habits of Modern Psychologists

1
Department of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
2
Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland 2120, New Zealand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 7 July 2017 / Revised: 3 August 2017 / Accepted: 8 August 2017 / Published: 14 August 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1946 KB, uploaded 14 August 2017]   |  

Abstract

Four data sets from studies included in the Reproducibility Project were re-analyzed to demonstrate a number of flawed research practices (i.e., “bad habits”) of modern psychology. Three of the four studies were successfully replicated, but re-analysis showed that in one study most of the participants responded in a manner inconsistent with the researchers’ theoretical model. In the second study, the replicated effect was shown to be an experimental confound, and in the third study the replicated statistical effect was shown to be entirely trivial. The fourth study was an unsuccessful replication, yet re-analysis of the data showed that questioning the common assumptions of modern psychological measurement can lead to novel techniques of data analysis and potentially interesting findings missed by traditional methods of analysis. Considered together, these new analyses show that while it is true replication is a key feature of science, causal inference, modeling, and measurement are equally important and perhaps more fundamental to obtaining truly scientific knowledge of the natural world. It would therefore be prudent for psychologists to confront the limitations and flaws in their current analytical methods and research practices. View Full-Text
Keywords: inference; NHST; modeling; measurement; replication; Observation Oriented Modeling inference; NHST; modeling; measurement; replication; Observation Oriented Modeling
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Grice, J.; Barrett, P.; Cota, L.; Felix, C.; Taylor, Z.; Garner, S.; Medellin, E.; Vest, A. Four Bad Habits of Modern Psychologists. Behav. Sci. 2017, 7, 53.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Behav. Sci. EISSN 2076-328X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top