Failure to CAPTCHA Attention: Null Results from an Honesty Priming Experiment in Guatemala
AbstractWe report results from a large online randomised tax experiment in Guatemala. The trial involves short messages and choices presented to taxpayers as part of a CAPTCHA pop-up window immediately before they file a tax return, with the aim of priming honest declarations. In total our sample includes 627,242 taxpayers and 3,232,430 tax declarations made over four months. Treatments include: honesty declaration; information about public goods; information about penalties for dishonesty, questions allowing a taxpayer to choose which public good they think tax money should be spent on; or questions allowing a taxpayer to state a view on the penalty for not declaring honestly. We find no impact of any of these treatments on the average amount of tax declared. We discuss potential causes for this null effect and implications for ‘online nudges’ around honesty priming. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Kettle, S.; Hernandez, M.; Sanders, M.; Hauser, O.; Ruda, S. Failure to CAPTCHA Attention: Null Results from an Honesty Priming Experiment in Guatemala. Behav. Sci. 2017, 7, 28.
Kettle S, Hernandez M, Sanders M, Hauser O, Ruda S. Failure to CAPTCHA Attention: Null Results from an Honesty Priming Experiment in Guatemala. Behavioral Sciences. 2017; 7(2):28.Chicago/Turabian Style
Kettle, Stewart; Hernandez, Marco; Sanders, Michael; Hauser, Oliver; Ruda, Simon. 2017. "Failure to CAPTCHA Attention: Null Results from an Honesty Priming Experiment in Guatemala." Behav. Sci. 7, no. 2: 28.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.