Next Article in Journal
Cancer Communication and Family Caregiver Quality of Life
Next Article in Special Issue
Cognitive Remediation Therapy for Adolescents with Anorexia Nervosa—Treatment Satisfaction and the Perception of Change
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Early Maladaptive Schemas and Cognitive Distortions in Adults with Morbid Obesity: Relationships with Mental Health Status
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Behav. Sci. 2017, 7(1), 11; doi:10.3390/bs7010011

Investigating Philosophies Underpinning Dietetic Private Practice

1
The Boden Institute of Obesity, Nutrition, Exercise and Eating Disorders, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Level 2, Charles Perkins Centre, John Hopkins Drive, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia
2
Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Dr, Sippy Downs, QLD 4556, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Amanda Sainsbury and Felipe Luz
Received: 23 November 2016 / Revised: 6 February 2017 / Accepted: 21 February 2017 / Published: 1 March 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [398 KB, uploaded 1 March 2017]   |  

Abstract

There is limited theory or knowledge regarding dietitians’ practice philosophies and how these philosophies are generated and incorporated into their professional practices. For the purposes of this study, a conceptual framework will explain and define the ‘philosophies’ as three different types of knowledge; episteme, techne, and phronesis. This study aimed to develop an explanatory theory of how dietitians in private practice source, utilise, and integrate practice philosophies. A grounded theory qualitative methodology was used to inform the sampling strategy, data collection, and analytical processes. Semi-structured interviews with dietitians in private practice were undertaken and data were collected and analysed concurrently. The results show that dietitians form collaborative relationships with their clients, in order to nurture change over time. They use intrinsic and intertwined forms of episteme, techne, and phronesis, which allow them to respond both practically and sensitively to their clients’ needs. The learning and integration of these forms of knowledge are situated in their own practice experience. Dietitians adapt through experience, feedback, and reflection. This study highlights that private practice offers a unique context in which dietitians deal with complex issues, by utilising and adapting their philosophies. View Full-Text
Keywords: grounded theory; health care professionals; diet therapy; knowledge utilization; philosophy; relationships; patient-provider; theory development grounded theory; health care professionals; diet therapy; knowledge utilization; philosophy; relationships; patient-provider; theory development
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Harper, C.; Maher, J. Investigating Philosophies Underpinning Dietetic Private Practice. Behav. Sci. 2017, 7, 11.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Behav. Sci. EISSN 2076-328X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top