Next Article in Journal
Biogeochemistry of Household Dust Samples Collected from Private Homes of a Portuguese Industrial City
Previous Article in Journal
Diversity of Volcanic Geoheritage in the Canary Islands, Spain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Metal(loid)s Transport in Hydrographic Networks of Mining Basins: The Case of the La Carolina Mining District (Southeast Spain)

1
Department of Mechanical and Mining Engineering-CEACTEMA, EPS de Linares, University of Jaén, Scientific and Technological Campus, 23700 Linares, Spain
2
Department of Geology-CEACTEMA, E.P.S. de Linares, University of Jaén, Scientific and Technological Campus, 23700 Linares, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Geosciences 2020, 10(10), 391; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10100391
Submission received: 2 September 2020 / Revised: 18 September 2020 / Accepted: 21 September 2020 / Published: 28 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Geochemistry)

Abstract

:
This study analyses the distribution of the total metal(loid)s content accumulated in the sediments of the Grande River, the most important river course that runs through the old mining district of La Carolina (Jaén, Spain), whose waters are collected in an urban supply reservoir. In total, 102 sediments samples were taken along the river, 51 in the live-bed channel and another 51 in the floodplain. The samples analysed have high metal(loid)s content, sometimes much higher than the reference levels established by European and regional legislation for soils, especially Pb, As and Ba, with average values of 5452 mg/kg, 116 mg/kg and 2622 mg/kg, respectively. The statistical analysis of the values obtained allows the distribution of the contents of the different elements along the river to be characterized and the associations and dispersion patterns in the sediments of the metal(loid)s coming from the environmental liabilities of the numerous dumpsites and tailings dams generated by mining activity to be defined. In both cases, the high metal(loid)s content identified as well as the resulting values of various environmental indices (the enrichment factor, contamination factor, geoaccumulation index, potential ecological risk index and pollution load index), confirmed that the sediment samples were moderately to highly contaminated over extensive areas of the basin studied, with the greatest intensity and extent in the floodplain sediments.

1. Introduction

At the end of the last century, the mineral reserves of many deposits were depleted, causing a metal price crisis that led to the closure of many mining operations worldwide. These circumstances occurred in a context where the environmental protection laws of many countries were poorly developed or non-existent, so the necessary remediation measures were not adopted to mitigate environmental damage after abandonment.
Metallic mineral mining and its associated pyrometallurgical practices are one of the main causes of heavy metal contamination of soil and water resources worldwide [1,2], affecting up to several kilometres from the pollution source [3]. The main transport agent is water, both by infiltration and erosion in tailings deposits and by drainage of mining holes [4]. This has been demonstrated by the Environment Agency of England and Wales in the rivers that flow through old mining districts in the United Kingdom, where after more than 4000 years, the rivers have been contaminated by lead, zinc and copper and many other metals and metalloids, including iron, tin, arsenic and silver, from dumpsites and tailings dams that have contributed solid contaminants to live-bed channels and floodplains of the rivers for decades after their closure [2,4,5,6]. This has been equally evident in other mining districts of the world [7,8,9,10,11,12].
The effect is manifested with greater intensity in the fine fraction of the sediment, composed of clay and silt with particle sizes below 63 µm [13], generally by the metalloids associated with the minerals that had been mined. To determine this impact, the measured contents are compared with the geochemical background values and with the maximum allowable levels established for the regulations of the region and/or country using statistical methods and contamination indices [8,9,10,11].
In recent decades, scientists, ecologists, politicians and society in general have demonstrated greater awareness regarding the existing problems related to the extensive contamination of soils and the corresponding environmental consequences [14]. Therefore, the different environmental agencies have taken an interest in evaluating, informing and acting on these affected areas through the development of laws and projects with the aim of protecting both the environment and the health of living beings [4,5,15]. The concern is greater when the land is used for agriculture because of the risk of the transfer of metal contamination to humans through food consumption, affecting their health, especially that of the young [7,16,17].
The study area is located in the old metallogenic district of Linares-La Carolina (Southern Spain), which is characterized by the presence of vein deposits of lead and copper sulphides. This district, abandoned today, was the object of intense exploitation through underground mining from pre-Roman times, and was one of the most important lead producers the world in for a long time [18,19]. As a result of this intense activity, very large volumes of waste were generated from the extraction, concentration and smelting activities, sometimes with high ore grades due to the technical limitations of these processes [20]. Given the orography of the region, these wastes accumulate on the margins of the river channels that run through the sector, whose waters flow into the Rumblar reservoir, destined for human consumption (Figure 1).
This study is based on sampling performed in the sediments of the main river of the fluvial network of the mining district of La Carolina, specifically in the Grande River (Figure 1a,b). For this, a geochemical study was conducted in two sedimentary environments, a live-bed channel and a floodplain [21,22]. Through statistical techniques and environmental factors the distribution of the metal(loid)s contents was qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated from the different pollution sources derived from the mining activities. In addition, the distribution of Pb, As and pollution load index (PLI) has been modeled along the course of the affected rivers in this mining basin using the geostatistical kriging tool, giving information on the areas of greatest impact on their sediments. To determine the degree of contamination of this mining district, the generic reference levels established by the regional and Dutch regulations for each trace element according to soil use were compared. Finally, groups and associations of elements were defined according to their natural or anthropogenic origin, estimating the extent of the condition [15,23,24,25].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study area is located on the southeast slope of Sierra Morena within the Hesperic massif (southeastern Spain) in the old mining district of La Carolina. The area corresponds to the hydrographic basin of the Grande River and its two main tributaries, Campana and Renegadero (Figure 1a,b), which, with an approximate area of 100 km2, collect the waters of the mining district until discharging them to the Rumblar supply and irrigation reservoir.
The climate of the region is continental Mediterranean, with cold winters and warm summers, so the flows that run throughout the year are very reduced and even disappear during the summer. The average annual precipitation is 613 mm, and the average annual temperature is 15.8 °C [26].
The water in the Grande River carries high concentrations of metal(loid)s, especially in low water periods and during the first autumn rainfall, so that it exceeds the maximum concentration limits for Cd, Pb and Zn established by environmental quality regulations for surface waters. When considering La Campana River, As is also added to these three elements. On average, discharges from mine adits located in the headwater catchment area account for the entry into surface waters of more than 20 tons of Fe, several tons of Mn, and hundreds of kilograms of As per year, which are transported downstream to the Rumblar reservoir [27]. During the wet season, especially during periods of flooding, there is a dilution of mining spills, so the stream water entering the reservoir presents good chemical quality and low mineralization. Despite this seasonal dilution effect, contents in As, Cu and Pb have been detected in the waters at the tail-end of the reservoir that exceed the maximum admissible limits for human consumption.
Geologically, two large groups stand out at the regional level: a Paleozoic basement and a posthercynian sedimentary cover (Figure 1b). The Paleozoic basement is made up of metamorphic rocks, basically phyllites with quartzite intercalations, that were intensely folded during the Hercynian orogeny and subsequently affected by a granitic intrusion. The intense folding and fracturing tectonics that affected the Paleozoic set resulted in a wide network of fractures, many of which were later mineralized by a hydrothermal fluid enriched in metallic sulphides, consisting mainly of galena, sphalerite, chalcopyrite and pyrite, with quartz, ankerite and calcite as accompanying minerals. The orientation of these veins, which have a subvertical disposition, is N 70°–110° E y N 30° E, highlighting those of “Los Guindos”, “Ojo Vecino” and “El Sinapismo”, among others [28]. Discordantly on the Palaeozoic basement and fossilizing these mineralizations, the posthercynian cover appears, which is subhorizontally arranged. The cover is made up of Triassic materials (red shales and conglomerates), Miocene (marls with levels of sandstones, silts and/or breccia at the base) and quaternaries (silts, sands and gravels associated with the filling of the channels) [18,19,29].
In this mining district, extraction was achieved by underground mining using the method of shrinkage stoping, for which it was necessary to excavate wells and galleries that generated a large amount of waste that accumulated in the vicinity. Everything obtained was treated through numerous concentration operations with the aim of obtaining a high-grade ore. The concentration processes were carried out by gravimetric techniques and by flotation, wet processing in both cases, generating a brine of treatment water that was poured directly into the channels and solid waste that was accumulated in dumps and in fine tailings ponds (Figure 1b), where the waters separated after the decantation of the solids were also drained into the nearby channels. Finally, the sulphide concentrates obtained were smelted in the metallurgical plants that were installed in the region to obtain metals of industrial interest, generating gaseous, liquid and slag waste [18,20,28].
In this district, up to 32 tailings ponds and dams have been counted (Figure 1b and Figure 2c) with significantly high total metal(loid)s content, especially, Pb, Zn and As [30], with the common assumption that all these wastes were deposited without any prior adaptation of the site for environmental mitigation [10,31]. In addition, the orography of this district, of valleys and hills sometimes with steep slopes and a well-developed hydrographic network, facilitates the mobilization of mining waste with high contents of metals and metalloids towards the drainage network [32].

2.2. Sampling and Analysis

For the study, 51 sampling points were selected along the river (Figure 1a,b) as follows: in the main channel of the Grande River (samples G1 to G25), in its tributary the Renegadero River (samples R1 to R17) and in the Campana River, a tributary of the Renegadero River (samples C1 to C9). The sampling was designed after the geological and mining cartographies of the area and previous field work were reviewed. The selection of the sampling sites ensured they were consistently spaced along the channel and that they sampled sedimentation zones, natural traps, meanders, bars, etc., downstream of the old mining operations, dumpsites and tailings ponds.
At all the selected points, two samples were taken, one in the channel bed and the other in the floodplain, to compare the distributions of the contents in both sedimentary environments [10,33].
Each sample consisted of four subsamples collected in the shape of a Greek cross with a spacing of 1 m (Figure 2a,b), taking the first 20 cm of the soil with an open-face “Edelman” auger (Figure 2a), which was subsequently placed in plastic bags in which they were mixed and stored, with an average weight of 1.5–2 kg.
Once in the laboratory, the samples were physically prepared for analysis, which consisted of drying and homogenization, quartering, sieving and grinding. The samples were sieved (PVC sieve and bottom) to separate the <2 mm fraction, classifying the fine fractions by sedimentation according to the UNE 103101:1995 standard.
For the determination of the total metal(loid)s content, the <2 mm fraction was ground in an agate ball mill until a size of less than 50 microns was obtained (Retsch PM 100). Chemical attack was performed on 1 g of the milled sample by total microwave digestion [34], using HNO3 as reactants with the addition of H2O2, which facilitates the complete oxidation of organic matter [35]. The analysis of the solutions obtained was performed by ICP-MS (inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry) in the laboratories of the Center for Scientific and Technical Instrumentation of the University of Jaén in a mass spectrometer with a plasma torch ionization source and an AGILENT model 7900 quadrupole ion filter. The samples with a Pb concentration exceeding the limit allowed by the analytical method (10,000 mg/kg) were analysed with portable X-ray fluorescence equipment (Niton XLT 792) according method 6200 (US EPA 1998). Three measurements were performed on the sample for 60 s, and the mean value was calculated [36,37].

2.3. Evaluation of the Heavy Metal Content in Sediments

To identify metalloid enrichment in the analysed sediments, values of the naturally occurring geochemical background are required to serve as a reference level. In this study, Clarke values and acid igneous rocks were used [38,39,40] for the calculation of different environmental factors and indices.
The enrichment factor (EF) assesses the impact of anthropogenic sources of heavy metals in the sediment using the following equation [41]:
EF = ( C M / C P ) sample ( C M / C P ) background
where (CM/CP)sample is the ratio of the heavy metal concentration (CM) to the phosphorus concentration (CP) in the sediment sample and (CM/CP)background refers to the background values for each metal in Clarke values and acid igneous rocks. A value of EF close to 1 suggests natural weathering processes, EF > 1.5 indicates human influence and EFs of 1.5–3, 3–5, 5–10 and >10 are considered evidence of minor, moderate, moderately severe, and severe enrichment, respectively [42,43,44].
The geoaccumulation index (Igeo) defines the level of contamination in the sediment by the following relationship [45]:
I geo = Log 2 [ C n 1.5   B n ]
where Cn is the average concentration of the metal in the sediment and Bn represents the average values for trace elements of acid igneous rocks [40]. A factor of 1.5 is introduced to minimize the possible variations in the background data that may be due to lithological variations. Seven levels of Igeo are established: uncontaminated (<0), uncontaminated to moderately contaminated (0–1), moderately contaminated (1–2), moderately to strongly contaminated (2–3), strongly contaminated (>3), strongly to extremely strongly contaminated (3–4) and extremely contaminated (>4) [46].
Another index analysed in this work is the ecological risk potential (Eri and RI), which estimates the potential ecological risk of each metal (Eri) and potential ecological risk index (RI) for the set of metals/metalloids in the sediment [47]:
E r i = T r i × C i C n i
RI = i = 1 n E r i
where Tri is the toxic factor of a metal/metalloid for As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb, V and Zn with a value of 10, 30, 5, 2, 5, 1, 5, 5, 2 and 1, respectively [11,47]. Ci is the average concentration of metal i in the sediment samples, and Cni is the background value of heavy metal i in acid igneous rocks [40].
The values of Eri are grouped into the following classes: very high risk (Eri > 320), high risk (160 ≤ Eri ≤ 320), considerable risk (80 ≤ Eri < 160), moderate risk (40 ≤ Eri < 80), and low risk (Eri < 40).
RI is defined as the sum of Eri and is classified as very high ecological risk (RI > 600), considerable ecological risk (300 ≤ RI ≤ 600), moderate ecological risk (150 ≤ RI < 300) and low ecological risk (RI < 150) [11].
Finally, the pollution load index (PLI) and contamination factor (CF) were considered, where the PLI is defined as the root of the multiplication of the metalloid CF [48]:
CF metals = C metal C background
PLI = ( CF 1 × CF 2 × CF 3 × × CF n ) 1 / n
where CF is the relationship between the average concentration (Cmetal) and the background values ford each metal (Cbackground). Four classes define the contamination of a metal: low (CF < 1), moderate (1 ≤ CF < 3), considerable grade (3 ≤ CF < 6) and very high (CF ≥ 6) [49,50]. A PLI value of zero indicates no background concentration, a value of one indicates the presence of only a baseline level of contaminants, and values greater than one indicate a progressive deterioration of the quality of the site [48].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Univariate and multivariate statistical techniques were used to determine the interrelation and variability of each metal(loid)s to determine the presence of anomalies. The data processing was performed using SPSS 22 software developed by IBM.
The mean, median, range, standard deviation, variance, skewness and kurtosis were calculated, generating the histograms, normality plots and box and whisker plots [51,52].
In multivariate statistics, a principal component analysis is performed with the objective of transforming a set of original variables into a new set of variables, called factors, which are characterized by being correlated with each other. The first factor or component explains the largest variance in the data set, the second factor or component explains the second largest variance in the data set, and so on for the rest of the factors [53]. For its interpretation, the rotation of the components (axes) is used. Varimax rotation is the most commonly used approach in geochemistry, which is adequate when the number of components is small. This technique has been used in different environmental scenarios [21,54,55,56].
Geostatistical analysis through an ordinary kriging of a spherical semivariogram model was used to predict the contents of Pb and As and the PLI along the entire course of the sampled rivers, since this technique provides the best spatial prediction for unsampled locations [57]. The information was processed to develop distribution maps using arcGIS 10.6 software developed by ESRI.

3. Results and Discussion

The different regulatory standards concerning contaminated soils establish generic reference levels (GRL) that indicate possible impacts on humans and/or ecosystems if they are exceeded. The concentrations of 17 metal(loid)s (Ag, As, Ba, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ni, P, Pb, Sr, V and Zn) in the 102 samples collected in the live-bed channel and in the floodplain (Table 1) were analysed. In Table 1, the values that exceed the limit set by the Andalusian regional standard and the Dutch standard are highlighted in bold. Note that in the case of Pb, only sample R1, taken in the live-bed channel, and samples R1 and R2, taken in the floodplain, have contents that are below the norm values.
Table 2 shows the main statistical parameters for the metal(loid)s studied in the samples taken in the floodplain as well as the GRL established by the regional government [15] and Dutch regulations [25]. In bold the values that exceed these reference limits are highlighted. The average values obtained for the concentrations of Pb and As stand out clearly exceeding the GRL of Andalusia and the Dutch standards and Ba exceeds the intervention value established in the most restrictive Dutch standard.
Figure 3 shows the variation in the Pb and As contents in the hydrographic basin studied both in the live-bed channel and in the floodplain and compares them with the limits established by the Andalusian and Dutch regulations. In the three rivers Grande Renegadero and Campana practically all the samples collected present Pb and As values above the GRL in the two sedimentary environments although the maximum concentrations of Pb and As are recorded in the vicinity of the old abandoned mining operations and extend downstream in both cases with greater intensity in the floodplain. The Pb concentration peaks greatly vary in both sedimentary environments which indicates its low mobility being more homogeneously distributed in the live-bed channel with an increase towards the tail of the Rumblar reservoir (samples G23 to G25). As presents a lower spatial variability than Pb with a similar response in both sedimentary environments although at a lower intensity in the live-bed channel. Only 14 samples are below the intervention levels for As: the first four samples in the headwaters of the Renegadero River (R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5) in both sedimentary environments and sample R6 in the live-bed channel located upstream of the mining works sample C4 in the floodplain of the Campana River and samples G22 and G24 in the live-bed channel all located far from mining liabilities (Figure 1 and Figure 3). In the case of Ba the intervention value is exceeded in most of the samples analysed especially in the floodplain.
Table 2 shows the maximum and minimum values mean median standard deviation variance kurtosis and asymmetry of the metal(loid)s studied. The concentrations of Pb As and Ba (elements related to the mineral paragenesis of the ore of interest) present different mean and median values. In addition the standard deviations and variances are high together with kurtosis and positive asymmetry due to the presence of extreme values which indicates a high degree of heterogeneity and dispersion along the channel.
Figure 4 shows the histograms box and whisker plots and normality plots for the concentrations of Pb, As and Ba in the samples taken in the live-bed and in the floodplain. For Pb the histograms are similar in the two sedimentary environments skewed to the right by extreme values. Additionally the box and whisker plots are similar in both situations showing numerous extreme values with a lognormal distribution as shown in the Q/Q plots of Figure 4. For As the live-bed histogram is symmetric but not the histogram of the floodplain which presents two families of values. The box and whisker plots are similar in both sedimentary environments with lower extreme values referring to the headwaters of the Renegadero River. The distribution is normal as shown in the Q/Q normality plots except for low values. The histograms of Ba for both environments are asymmetric to the right. The box and whisker plots for Ba show numerous extreme values presenting a lognormal distribution.
A multivariate analysis by principal components with varimax rotation was performed for the sediment samples obtained in the live-bed channel and in the floodplain. The total variance explained by the four components is 80.2% in the live-bed channel and 83.1% in the floodplain. In the live-bed channel (Table 3a) the following groupings are identified: component 1 which represents 21.9% of the variance and includes Mn Co Cu and As elements associated with the mineralization of this mining basin; component 2 which represents 20.35% of the variance and is composed of Fe Mg V Ni and Zn (elements naturally related to the soil); component 3 which represents 19.6% of the variance and is associated with P Cr Ca and Cd natural components of rocks and soils; and finally component 4 which represents 18.4% of the variance and groups Ba Sr Pb and Ag which is associated with the mineral paragenesis of the studied environment and therefore with the mining activities performed.
In the case of the floodplain (Table 3b) the following groups were obtained: component 1 (27.9% of the variance) groups Ba Sr Cd Pb Zn and Ag all elements of mineral paragenesis and therefore with anthropogenic influence linked to mining; component 2 (23.1% of the variance) composed of Co Mn Cu Ni and Fe associated with the mineralization of this mining basin; component 3 (19.8% of the variance) composed of V Mg Cr and P elements that are present in the rock matrix; and the fourth component which represents 12.3% of the variance and groups Ca and As. In both sedimentary contexts Pb is associated with Ba Sr and Ag.
Based on the values of the metal(loid)s content of the sediments the environmental factors and indices mentioned in the methods section were calculated. In the case of the EF of the 17 metal(loid)s analysed Zn As Ag Cd Ba and Pb have high values (>10) compared to their Clarke values in the Earth’s crust. The EF of Pb increases when the geochemical background values for acid rocks are used as a reference which indicates that there is a very severe anthropogenic influence (Table 2).
The CF presents very high values for Zn As Ag Cd and Pb with values of 10.3 74.3 25.9 37.4 and 2216.3 respectively. Note the case of Pb which is the main ore of the mining basin with a CF 30 times higher than those of the rest of the metal(loid)s. In addition other elements such as Mn Co Ni Cu and Ba reach significant values with CF values of 1.5, 2.6, 3.5, 2.5 and 2.9 respectively.
The values obtained for the geoaccumulation index (Igeo) show an extremely high level of contamination in the case of As Ag Cd and Pb with values of 5.6, 4.1, 4.6 and 10.5 respectively. The Zn content in the sediments with a value of 2.8 presents a moderate to strong level of contamination. Moderate levels of contamination by Co Ni Cu and Ba are also present with values of 0.8, 1.2, 0.7 and 0.9 respectively for Igeo.
The potential ecological risk (Eri) values calculated for V, Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Cd and Pb are 1, 2, 1, 13, 18, 12, 10, 743, 1123, and 1,1081 respectively highlighting a very high risk for As, Cd and Pb with respect to the rest of the metal(loid)s studied. Considering the set of elements analysed a value of 13,006 is obtained for the RI so there is a very high ecological risk in the study area.
The PLI obtained for all metal(loid)s is 2.8 indicating a strong deterioration of the environmental quality of this mining area. This index estimated for each sample in both the floodplain and the live-bed channel (Figure 5) indicates that in both environments all the sediment samples analysed are contaminated (PLI > 1). In the live-bed channel (Figure 5a) although there is a wide variation the maximums are observed in the central section of the three channels (Grande Renegadero and Campana) decreasing towards the lower section of the Grande River which is the furthest away from mining activity. In the floodplain (Figure 5b) there are high PLI values in the middle and lower reaches of Renegadero with values between 3 and 4 which could be associated with scouring due to large flooding events and the formation of wide bars in the channel. In the Campana River higher values for PLI appear in the live-bed channel (between 2 and 4) than in the floodplain (between 2 and 3). Although the sediment values in the Grande River remain between 2 and 3 a maximum is observed in sample G4 (as in the live-bed channel) and in samples G24 and G25 located at the tail of the Rumblar reservoir.
Figure 6 maps the spatial variation in Pb and As. For Pb anomalies can be seen in the live-beds of the Renegadero and Campana channels clearly related to mining activity (Figure 6a) while in the floodplain the anomalies cover more area but less intense being located downstream in the final section of the Renegadero and middle part of the Grande River (Figure 6b). Anomalies for the As content of the sediments of the live bed are observed in the upper part of the Grande River and throughout the Campana River with intermediate values in the final sections of the Renegadero and lower reach of the Grande River (Figure 6c). In the floodplain As (Figure 6d) shows strong As concentration anomalies throughout the Grande River as well as in the middle and lower reaches of the Renegadero River and lower intensity anomalies in the Campana. Figs. 6e and 6f show the spatial distribution of the PLI values displaying similar behaviour in both sedimentary environments and presenting the highest contamination in the middle and upper reaches of the Grande River and the lower reaches of the Renegadero and in the Campana River with greater intensity and extent in the floodplain.

4. Conclusions

The sediments of the Grande River and its tributaries Renegadero and Campana have high contents of Cd, Ag, Co, Ni, Cu, As, Zn, Ba and Pb with average values in the floodplain deposits of 4, 5, 14, 27, 90, 116, 659, 2622 and 5452 mg/kg respectively. These values are much higher than those of the regional geochemical background and those established in the generic reference levels of government regulations. Pb and As present the highest contents with maximum concentration values of 15,533 and 192 mg/kg respectively. These metal(loid)s come from the existing mining liabilities in the area (ruins of old mining facilities dumpsites and fines tailings dams). The average concentrations are somewhat higher in the samples taken in the floodplain than in the samples taken in the live-bed channel showing more variable Pb behaviour with numerous peaks that indicate great variability and low mobility. In contrast As has a more uniform distribution along the basin and its maximum concentrations generally do not coincide with those of Pb.
The mineral paragenesis elements of mining interest (group 1 of the principal component analysis for the floodplain and group 4 for the live-bed channel) especially Pb and Ba present heterogeneity and dispersion with lognormal behaviour and numerous extreme values.
The environmental indices calculated suggest a high degree of impact by metals in the basin sediments for the elements Ag, As, Ba, Cd, Pb, Zn of the mineral paragenesis classifying the existing contamination as moderate to high. For Pb anomalies occur in the live-bed channel both in the Renegadero River and in the Campana River clearly related to mining with more intense and extensive effects in the floodplain due to strong flooding creating areas used for cultivation [5] both in the final stretch of the Renegadero and in the middle stretch of the Grande River. As is present in the sediments of the entire basin both in the bed-live and in the floodplain presenting only low concentrations in the upper reaches of the Renegadero River. The distribution map of the PLI shows effects on the soils with the greatest intensity in the sediments of the live-bed channel in the upper section of the Grande River in the lower section of the Renegadero River and throughout the entire Campana River.
The results obtained from the study of the sediments of the Grande riverbed show that this old mining basin has been highly affected especially because the waste generated was accumulated without any preventive measures after abandonment requiring competent administrations to take remediation measures.
Heavy metals have a significant presence in the area studied, resulting in highly contaminated sediments according to data obtained in this work, similar other work was carried out in other mining basins around the world such as that of the Environment Agency in England [5]. This contamination was transported several kilometres away from the pollutant sources and is guaranteed to contribute heavy metals to the human water supply reservoir damage the ecosystem and lead to a deteriorated ecological state.
Finally note that an old mining basin was analysed in its entirety that until now had not been studied. Considering the results obtained this is a significantly contaminated area that until now had gone unnoticed by the regional environmental agency.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.M., J.M. and M.C.H., Investigation, R.M., J.M. and J.R., Software, R.M., Formal analysis, R.M. and M.J.C.-S., Writing—original draft, R.M., Writing and review, R.M., J.M., M.C.H., J.R. and M.J.C.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the CEACTEMA (University of Jaén) for the partial financing of this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Barcan, V.; Kovnatsky, E. Soil surface geochemical anomaly around the copper-nickel metallurgical smelter. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 1998, 103, 197–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Byrne, P.; Reid, I.; Wood, P.J. Sediment geochemistry of streams draining abandoned lead/ zinc mines in central Wales: The Afon Twymyn. J. Soils Sediments 2010, 10, 683–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Horvat, M.; Nolde, N.; Fajon, V.; Jereb, V.; Logar, M.; Lojen, S.; Jacimovic, R.; Falnoga, I.; Liya, Q.; Faganeli, J.; et al. Total mercury methylmercury and selenium in mercury polluted areas in the province Guizhou China. Sci. Total Environ. 2003, 304, 231–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Byrne, P.; Wood, P.J.; Reid, I. The impairment of river systems by metal mine contamination: A review including remediation options. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 42, 2017–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hudson-Edwards, K.A.; Macklin, M.G.; Brewer, P.A.; Dennis, I.A. Assessment of Metal Mining-Contaminated River. 2008. Available online: http://www.eugris.info/displayresource.aspx?r=6681 (accessed on 10 June 2020).
  6. Dennis, I.; Coulthard, T.; Brewer, P.; Macklin, M. The role of floodplains in attenuating contaminated sediment fluxes in formerly mined drainage basins. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 2009, 34, 453–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Oyarzun, R.; Lillo, J.; López-García, J.A.; Esbrí, J.M.; Cubas, P.; Llanos, W.; Higueras, P. The Mazarrón Pb-(Ag)-Zn mining district (SE Spain) as a source of heavy metal contamination in a semiarid realm: Geochemical data from mine wastes soils and stream sediments. J. Geochem. Explor. 2011, 109, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Resongles, E.; Casiot, C.; Freydier, R.; Dezileau, L.; Viers, J.Ô.; Elbaz-Poulichet, F. Persisting impact of historical mining activity to metal (Pb Zn Cd Tl Hg) and metalloid (As Sb) enrichment in sediments of the Gardon River Southern France. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 481, 509–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ali, M.M.; Ali, M.L.; Islam, M.S.; Rahman, M.Z. Preliminary assessment of heavy metals in water and sediment of Karnaphuli River Bangladesh. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2016, 5, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Cortada, U.; Hidalgo, M.C.; Martínez, J.; Rey, J. Dispersion of metal(loid)s in fluvial sediments: An example from the Linares mining district (southern Spain). Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 16, 469–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huang, X.; Luo, D.; Zhao, D.; Li, N.; Xiao, T.; Liu, J.; Wei, L.; Liu, Y.; Liu, L.; Liu, G. Distribution Source and Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal(oid)s in Water Sediments and Corbicula Fluminea of Xijiang River China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ciszewski, D. The past and prognosis of mining cessation impact on river sediment pollution. J. Soils Sediments 2019, 19, 393–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Dennis, I.A.; Macklin, M.G.; Coulthard, T.J.; Brewer, P.A. The impact of the October-November 2000 floods on contaminant metal dispersal in the River Swale catchment North Yorkshire UK. Hydrol. Process. 2003, 17, 1641–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mulder, C.; Rutgers, M. Legislation and ecological quality assessment of soil: Implementation of ecological indication systems in Europe. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2005, 62, 201–210. [Google Scholar]
  15. de Andalucía, J. Decreto 18/2015. Boletín Oficial de la Junta de Andalucía; Consejería de Medio Ambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2015; Available online: https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/boja/2015/38/3 (accessed on 15 May 2020).
  16. Yang, Q.; Li, Z.; Lu, X.; Duan, Q.; Huang, L.; Bi, J. A review of soil heavy metal pollution from industrial and agricultural regions in China: Pollution and risk assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 642, 690–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bortey-Sam, N.; Nakayama, S.M.M.; Ikenaka, Y.; Akoto, O.; Baidoo, E.; Yohannes, Y.B.; Mizukawa, H.; Ishizuka, M. Human health risks from metals and metalloid via consumption of food animals near gold mines in Tarkwa Ghana: Estimation of the daily intakes and target hazard quotients (THQs). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 111, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lillo, F.J. Geology and Geochemistry of Linares—La Carolina Pb-ore Field (Sootheastern Border of the Hesperian Massif). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  19. Azcárate, J.E. Mapa Geológico y Memoria Explicativa de la Hoja 905 (Linares) Escala 1:50.000; I.G.M.E.: Madrid, Spain, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gutiérrez Guzmán, F. Las Minas De Linares. Apuntes Históricos; COLEGIO OF.: Jaén, Spain, 1999; ISBN 84-930339-1-X. [Google Scholar]
  21. Anju, M.; Banerjee, D.K. Multivariate statistical analysis of heavy metals in soils of a Pb–Zn mining area India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 184, 4191–4206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chandrasekaran, A.; Ravisankar, R.; Harikrishnan, N.; Satapathy, K.K.; Prasad, M.V.R.; Kanagasabapathy, K.V. Multivariate statistical analysis of heavy metal concentration in soils of Yelagiri Hills Tamilnadu India—Spectroscopical approach. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2015, 137, 589–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ferguson, C.C.; Kasamas, H. Risk Assessment for Contaminated Sites in Europe: Policy Framework; LQM Press: Nottingham, UK, 1999; Volume 2, ISBN 0953-309010. [Google Scholar]
  24. Martínez, J.; Llamas, J.; de Miguel, E.; Rey, J.; Hidalgo, M.C. Determination of the geochemical background in a metal mining site: Example of the mining district of Linares (South Spain). J. Geochem. Explor. 2007, 94, 19–29. [Google Scholar]
  25. Rijkswaterstaat Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management. Soil Remediation Circular 2013, Version of 1 July 2013. Available online: https://rwsenvironment.eu/subjects/soil/legislation-and/soil-remediation/ (accessed on 15 May 2020).
  26. Meteorology Statal Agency (Spain); Institute of Meteorology (Portugal). Iberian Climate Atlas; Government of Spain: Madrid, Spain, 2011; ISBN 978-84-7837-079-5.
  27. Rojas, D. Influence of Mine Wastes on the Water Resources in the La Carolina Mining District (Jaen). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Jaen, Jaén, Spain, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gutiérrez Guzmán, F. Minería en Sierra Morena El Distrito Minero De La Carolina; Ilustre Colegio Oficial de Ingenieros de Minas de Linares: Jaén, Spain, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rey, J.; Hidalgo, M.C.; Martínez-López, J. Upper Ordovician–Lower Silurian transgressive–regressive cycles of the Central Iberian Zone (NE Jaén Spain). Geol. J. 2005, 40, 477–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Martínez, J.; Hidalgo, M.C.; Rey, J.; Garrido, J.; Kohfahl, C.; Benavente, J.; Rojas, D. A multidisciplinary characterization of a tailings pond in the Linares-La Carolina mining district Spain. J. Geochem. Explor. 2016, 162, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rojas, D.; Hidalgo, M.; Kohfahl, C.; Rey, J.; Martínez, J.; Benavente, J. Oxidation Dynamics and Composition of the Flotation Plant Derived Tailing Impoundment Aquisgrana (Spain). Water Air Soil Pollut. 2019, 230, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. De La Torre, M.J.; Hidalgo, C.; Rey, J.; Martínez, J. Mineralogical Characterization of Tailing Dams: Incidence of Abandoned Mining Works on Soil Pollution (Linares Jaén). In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly 2012, Vienna, Austria, 22–27 April 2012. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pavlowsky, R.T.; Lecce, S.A.; Owen, M.R.; Martin, D.J. Legacy sediment lead and zinc storage in channel and floodplain deposits of the Big River Old Lead Belt Mining District MO USA. Geomorphology 2017, 299, 54–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Langston, W.J.; Spence, S.K. Metal Analysis. A Handbook of Ecotoxicology; Blackwell Sci.: London, UK, 1994; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  35. Xing, B.; Veneman, P.L.M. Microwave digestion for analysis of metals in soil. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1998, 29, 923–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Peinado, F.M.; Ruano, S.M.; González, M.G.B.; Molina, C.E. A rapid field procedure for screening trace elements in polluted soil using portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF). Geoderma 2010, 159, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Schneider, A.R.; Morvan, X.; Saby, N.P.A.; Cancès, B.; Ponthieu, M.; Gommeaux, M.; Marin, B. Multivariate spatial analyses of the distribution and origin of trace and major elements in soils surrounding a secondary lead smelter. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 15164–15174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Mason, B. Principles of Geochemistry; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  39. Rösler, H.J.; Lange, H. Geochemical Tables; Elsevier: New York, NY, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sponza, D.; Karaoǧlu, N. Environmental geochemistry and pollution studies of Aliaǧa metal industry district. Environ. Int. 2002, 27, 541–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zoller, W.H.; Gladney, E.S.; Duce, R.A. Atmospheric concentrations and sources of trace metals at the South Pole. Science 1974, 183, 198–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Selvaraj, K.; Ram Mohan, V.; Szefer, P. Evaluation of metal contamination in coastal sediments of the Bay of Bengal India: Geochemical and statistical approaches. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2004, 49, 174–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, J.; Liu, C.L. Riverine composition and estuarine geochemistry of particulate metals in China—Weathering features anthropogenic impact and chemical fluxes. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2002, 54, 1051–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Birch, G.F.; Olmos, M.A. Sediment-bound heavy metals as indicators of human influence and biological risk in coastal water bodies. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2008, 65, 1407–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Muller, G. Index of geoaccumulation in sediments of the Rhine River. GeoJournal 1969, 2, 108–118. [Google Scholar]
  46. Yu, G.B.; Liu, Y.; Yu, S.; Wu, S.C.; Leung, A.O.W.; Luo, X.S.; Xu, B.; Li, H.B.; Wong, M.H. Inconsistency and comprehensiveness of risk assessments for heavy metals in urban surface sediments. Chemosphere 2011, 85, 1080–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hakanson, L. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control. A sedimentological approach. Water Res. 1980, 14, 975–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tomlinson, D.L.; Wilson, J.G.; Harris, C.R.; Jeffrey, D.W. Problems in the assessment of heavy-metal levels in estuaries and the formation of a pollution index. Helgol. Meeresunters. 1980, 33, 566–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Turekian, K.K.; Wedepohl, K.H. Distribution of the Elements in Some Major Units of the Earths Crust. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1961, 72, 175–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Loska, K.; Cebula, J.; Pelczar, J.; Wiechuła, D.; Kwapuliński, J. Use of enrichment and contamination factors together with geoaccumulation indexes to evaluate the content of Cd Cu and Ni in the Rybnik water Reservoir in Poland. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1997, 93, 347–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sainz, A.; Grande, J.A.; de la Torre, M.L. Odiel River acid mine drainage and current characterisation by means of univariate analysis. Environ. Int. 2003, 29, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Filzmoser, P.; Hron, K.; Reimann, C. Univariate statistical analysis of environmental (compositional) data: Problems and possibilities. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 6100–6108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Einax, J.W.; Truckenbrodt, D.; Kampe, O. River Pollution Data Interpreted by Means of Chemometric Methods. Microchem. J. 1998, 58, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tahri, M.; Benyaïch, F.; Bounakhla, M.; Bilal, E.; Gruffat, J.J.; Moutte, J.; Garcia, D. Multivariate analysis of heavy metal contents in soils sediments and water in the region of Meknes (Central Morocco). Environ. Monit. Assess. 2005, 102, 405–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Astel, A.; Tsakovski, S.; Barbieri, P.; Simeonov, V. Comparison of self-organizing maps classification approach with cluster and principal components analysis for large environmental data sets. Water Res. 2007, 41, 4566–4578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lu, X.; Wang, L.; Li, L.Y.; Lei, K.; Huang, L.; Kang, D. Multivariate statistical analysis of heavy metals in street dust of Baoji NW China. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 173, 744–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Goovaerts, P. Geostatistical modelling of uncertainty in soil science. Geoderma 2001, 103, 3–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) General situation of the study area. (b) Spatial distribution of the sampling points and location of tailings impoundments.
Figure 1. (a) General situation of the study area. (b) Spatial distribution of the sampling points and location of tailings impoundments.
Geosciences 10 00391 g001
Figure 2. (a) Sediment sampling with Edelman auger in the floodplain of the Grande River, at the tail-end of the reservoir. (b) Four sub-samples arranged in a cross with a spacing of 1 m were collected at each sampling point. (c) Mining wastes deposited near the banks of the Renegadero River.
Figure 2. (a) Sediment sampling with Edelman auger in the floodplain of the Grande River, at the tail-end of the reservoir. (b) Four sub-samples arranged in a cross with a spacing of 1 m were collected at each sampling point. (c) Mining wastes deposited near the banks of the Renegadero River.
Geosciences 10 00391 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of Pb and As contents in sediments from La Carolina mining district. (a)—Pb; (b)—As. Generic reference levels (GRL) established by the regional government of 275 mg/kg for Pb and 36 mg/kg for As (Junta de Andalucía 2015) and Dutch intervention values of 530 mg/kg for Pb and 76 mg/kg for As (Dutch Ministry 2013) are showed.
Figure 3. Distribution of Pb and As contents in sediments from La Carolina mining district. (a)—Pb; (b)—As. Generic reference levels (GRL) established by the regional government of 275 mg/kg for Pb and 36 mg/kg for As (Junta de Andalucía 2015) and Dutch intervention values of 530 mg/kg for Pb and 76 mg/kg for As (Dutch Ministry 2013) are showed.
Geosciences 10 00391 g003
Figure 4. Histograms box-and-whisker plots and normality curves for Pb As and Ba.
Figure 4. Histograms box-and-whisker plots and normality curves for Pb As and Ba.
Geosciences 10 00391 g004
Figure 5. Distribution of pollution load index (PLI) values along the rivers of the La Carolina mining district. (a)—live-bed PLI value; (b)—floodplain PLI value.
Figure 5. Distribution of pollution load index (PLI) values along the rivers of the La Carolina mining district. (a)—live-bed PLI value; (b)—floodplain PLI value.
Geosciences 10 00391 g005
Figure 6. Spatial variation of the Pb and As contents and the pollution load index (PLI) values in the channel and floodplain of the rivers of the La Carolina mining district. (a)—Spatial variation of the Pb contents in live-bed; (b)—Spatial variation of the Pb contents in floodplain. (c) Spatial variation of the As contents in live-bed; (d)—Spatial variation of the As contents in floodplain. (e)—Pollution load index (PLI) values in live-bed; (f)—Pollution load index (PLI) values in floodplain.
Figure 6. Spatial variation of the Pb and As contents and the pollution load index (PLI) values in the channel and floodplain of the rivers of the La Carolina mining district. (a)—Spatial variation of the Pb contents in live-bed; (b)—Spatial variation of the Pb contents in floodplain. (c) Spatial variation of the As contents in live-bed; (d)—Spatial variation of the As contents in floodplain. (e)—Pollution load index (PLI) values in live-bed; (f)—Pollution load index (PLI) values in floodplain.
Geosciences 10 00391 g006
Table 1. Total concentrations (mg/kg) of selected elements in the sediment samples. Concentrations above the reference values are in bold.
Table 1. Total concentrations (mg/kg) of selected elements in the sediment samples. Concentrations above the reference values are in bold.
SamplesAgAsBaCaCdCoCrCuFeMgMnNiPPbSrVZn
Floodplain
G14.813650214531.9181210124,453146119902448840351811293
G26.48498710534.116156025,156128323132241752942517481
G37.317912487621.6151134026,640104910621848263123510240
G48.1178214816855.0311643231,229162044924656876802919546
G57.215710818902.6201130725,222106115732347465585010329
G63.4856026131.4141214726,79114779332446131526012276
G74.49812428351.7161216625,384139210752247348285512263
G84.512980015104.715156826,592249410933253643651818491
G99.2143613932255.113139924,682262510382755813,5856716504
G103.313294210963.012117223,88021228312649846741812501
G113.2103103624843.414225432,98032488943164336422623857
G122.68457718513.912164224,97728797602656538941317619
G133.1126134526903.415196331,604320110283064442262919836
G143.5153168030933.815157131,494302710912962146463216838
G153.5138120928933.815196832,674323311033266446742820821
G162.99467017113.811145330,99028648802658845311416607
G173.8155147129214.115158632,516305611292864352543014865
G182.412491620102.914176132,32931868763161439892218688
G191.911046913832.715205634,02531007493462432261824597
G203.1157145522403.414147131,61629189912761045882914767
G212.8137131722513.414156932,406292810182963140782716779
G226.8122220522144.710125118,73620767141835780842713495
G234.0116126218904.111144721,33522917112142455472116538
G248.4160332131936.312155425,21127048902355093283815685
G259.4143277334986.214166025,720297410272559010,2703215668
R10.1106269180.212211627,860275144425408367211872
R20.196495450.110201428,946274432622400358161772
R35.916802720775.2111631130,98124376302149376744813475
R41.01815139352.111192129,92127786682643117592717583
R51.51946979703.010213433,11630255802544821346218551
R63.6105396524812.911195528,60127055822261140275418642
R74.8140219312711.916177828,33020117952748876972717445
R811.81925537376811.1201811237,114258311552971911,25887181694
R96.2145395054175.918227632,889359511083279757776022987
R103.8160438337453.115337630,66538538433168043746838592
R117.3125495839547.015176834,018348911922866375844818924
R124.9124510540364.9162210239,0193744103334738547174251029
R135.8137542544755.2162022238,0693653107733694630277231010
R1410.0137386537238.216197533,3853398124029750118714720985
R155.0116171733644.318197135,76935869813365757773023911
R165.9156317354325.318207635,4353918126433674678848231003
R172.911434915223.013246028,60729357113681432222032554
C12.8186124032154.312154122,97726937852053232542418687
C23.1105290747133.712314423,68129856433273838735121582
C34.5109418930113.611204819,72523956891846548265613583
C49.54511762239512.515195939,207319511672648215,533172181794
C53.9120261036783.712255824,78030296272768945664117693
C63.493376220152.710203520,33824345901948232955317422
C72.891270229723.310244621,27326934812275729254318596
C82.995289130223.210244620,20125035172171030664717558
C94.2100414129743.910264321,36425265442470838386019588
Live-bed
G13.21134329101.2141410919,747141212052039626441315212
G23.81004746012.112124621,064108913031835835981315342
G33.71809085491.2121132922,18911149622037830071612270
G48.8180114931325.8321736128,782198846604758573912719593
G54.11975755041.2131222326,24511987362246235991413309
G64.4126224410221.8191724431,657185515423651835793418329
G73.413211388482.5171620027,020167215013345145892318343
G83.411071910092.711185326,54130657122853839091722354
G94.310065522352.911163519,15626967022454859832121303
G102.69223313931.711124621,38724125452551339421213269
G116.710580122804.314195939,565307611243163669402121942
G124.18849917774.413155429,01727788402757542461218635
G134.412548623183.0141610333,25328928433272350831920695
G142.810437717513.414155033,85328629333063939221217781
G152.511886618722.712215132,58430498063063535842725640
G167.6161288132556.713166127,353286911162559188163518706
G171.712921811842.412173928,18526066662557923781220522
G182.910630413552.713185033,02526567402962235821320649
G192.310234614993.014184735,64229378643363233641419709
G202.615623712842.513206133,69727676803161434901525608
G212.0921299751.812165424,53424905522455122851018463
G221.9671938912.48103420,3901935456204192531712409
G232.0771498932.79113525,3262032546234712785613465
G242.06522410573.210132722,7842341705225152640915436
G252.47832411582.99124924,53524975712355730051014418
R10.1189044340.111231837,278327733027483309181981
R20.71516495220.310221431,0872902296264001125271988
R38.2591267115424.315198134,75328996922746510,51117317619
R43.2231031013652.610212334,266319361528467543314619635
R50.72015926302.310221935,94633375282848216772518619
R61.323896615234.413202029,7532616123328460256811520830
R73.385153117092.410194928,01327164172672731642617567
R84.1115359151595.216285931,30436909543298936076126912
R94.785144640533.914225633,90540478863272836962824760
R104.1147312546034.616238532,557405410523279849985125723
R1110.9174344060989.018108337,289385218552860610,60640121350
R123.995104625957.017205839,9333268151638712441322241087
R133.610786233615.216225740,2133645102236713499522251038
R144.690185029975.012194325,85231668232357353122619673
R154.2104184833105.315215636,510352210613470945843324975
R163.210053724924.017194931,106323510073364534231420865
R174.111834838743.317196028,57836299463985652432324520
C16.7168557911632.314149828,35318986862848110,2826617462
C23.2231112218195.012135327,58322887652453239161815805
C33.1119249138224.713374818,652239945430111136345020642
C43.8110466953464.69446119,855301940732125146317419688
C53.6148276750437.113635722,207305868939157547845720888
C66.4197872756047.79385922,070235441521839702212815911
C75.4144774126936.811275823,684238754524805407110518781
C84.61051053927045.48363621,741214531328526421113617582
C93.193373527543.78204517,75323463931956028245415490
Table 2. Descriptive statistics of total concentrations: minimum maximum median range standard deviation (all data in mg kg) variance skewness and kurtosis. Enrichment factors referred to crust Clarke values and acid rocks are showed. Generic reference levels (GRL) established by the regional government (Junta de Andalucía 2015) and the Dutch soil standard (Dutch Ministry 2013) are also included. Concentrations above the reference values are in bold.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics of total concentrations: minimum maximum median range standard deviation (all data in mg kg) variance skewness and kurtosis. Enrichment factors referred to crust Clarke values and acid rocks are showed. Generic reference levels (GRL) established by the regional government (Junta de Andalucía 2015) and the Dutch soil standard (Dutch Ministry 2013) are also included. Concentrations above the reference values are in bold.
ElementMin.Max.MeanMedianRangeStd. DeviationVarianceSkewnessKurtosisCrust Clarke ValuesAcid Rocks
Ag0125412370.780.330.100.15
As9192116124182441.978−0.920.7152
Ba34911,7622622171711,41422034,852,4621.854.92260830
Ca545543224722395488712431,544,1830.42−0.3936,300-
Cd0124412251.694.920.150.10
Co10311414214132.098.31235
Cr (III-VI)11331818225230.831.0920025
Cu1443290634188571962.626.727030
Fe18,73639,20728,72428,60720,471530828,173,4310.03−0.7950,000-
Mg10493918270427782869705497,429−0.690.1520,900-
Mn32644929998944166611373,7804.0821.611000600
Ni18462726285290.741.44808
P35781458359045711513,3320.03−0.98180700
Pb35815,5335452464615,17530109,061,3071.362.40162
Sr131724231159287592.6610.77300300
V10381817275251.664.9715040
Zn7217946595961723318101,4111.363.9413260
ElementEnrichment Factor (crust)Enrichment Factor (acid rocks)Generic Reference Levels in AndaluciaDutch Regulations for Standard Soils Intervention Value
IndustrialUrbanOthers
Ag9437----
As479340363676
Ba203.7910,00010,00010,000625
Ca0.14-----
Cd5448750752513
Co1.243.392502524190
Cr (III-VI)0.180.8710,000–10010,000–2010,000–20180–78
Cu2.603.6010,0003130595190
Fe1.16-----
Mg0.26-----
Mn2.022.00----
Ni0.684.0410,00015301530100
P11----
Pb68932722750275275530
Sr0.280.17----
V0.240.54365036550-
Zn101310,00010,00010,000720
Table 3. Principal component loadings obtained in principal component analysis of the element concentrations in the live-bed (a) and in the floodplain (b).
Table 3. Principal component loadings obtained in principal component analysis of the element concentrations in the live-bed (a) and in the floodplain (b).
(a) Live-Bed(b) Floodplain
VariableComponentVariableComponent
12341234
Mn0.860 0.233 −0.113−0.002 Ba0.919−0.0550.143−0.113
Co0.855 0.413 −0.023−0.019 Sr0.893−0.0470.261−0.164
Cu0.822 −0.260 −0.125−0.099 Cd0.8900.181−0.0380.270
As0.667 −0.292 0.3500.054 Pb0.8250.218−0.2510.273
Fe0.130 0.866 −0.2510.096 Zn0.7840.2000.2590.230
Mg−0.214 0.837 0.3080.127 Ag0.7690.283−0.2140.421
V−0.037 0.755 0.313 −0.139 Co0.1760.9280.0970.197
Ni0.451 0.675 0.327 −0.106 Mn0.1240.917−0.1860.115
Zn0.117 0.609 0.426 0.395 Cu0.1080.884−0.1110.121
P−0.016 0.186 0.943 −0.022 Ni−0.0490.8420.4430.112
Cr−0.200 0.029 0.860 0.161 Fe0.3580.5270.508−0.147
Ca0.182 0.280 0.783 0.356 V−0.0420.2150.8200.037
Cd0.245 0.277 0.579 0.552 Mg0.210−0.0380.8190.143
Ba−0.209 −0.059 0.097 0.875 Cr−0.052−0.1860.786−0.087
Sr−0.214 −0.033 0.172 0.842 P0.0680.1440.6570.596
Pb0.468 0.140 0.047 0.727 As0.1000.374−0.0990.845
Ag0.641 0.070 0.105 0.667 Ca0.414−0.0300.4310.692
% Var21.92%20.25%19.56%18.42%% Var27.91%23.05%19.79%12.31%

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mendoza, R.; Martínez, J.; Rey, J.; Hidalgo, M.C.; Campos-Suñol, M.J. Metal(loid)s Transport in Hydrographic Networks of Mining Basins: The Case of the La Carolina Mining District (Southeast Spain). Geosciences 2020, 10, 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10100391

AMA Style

Mendoza R, Martínez J, Rey J, Hidalgo MC, Campos-Suñol MJ. Metal(loid)s Transport in Hydrographic Networks of Mining Basins: The Case of the La Carolina Mining District (Southeast Spain). Geosciences. 2020; 10(10):391. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10100391

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mendoza, Rosendo, Julián Martínez, Javier Rey, M. Carmen Hidalgo, and M. José Campos-Suñol. 2020. "Metal(loid)s Transport in Hydrographic Networks of Mining Basins: The Case of the La Carolina Mining District (Southeast Spain)" Geosciences 10, no. 10: 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10100391

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop