Next Article in Journal
Land Use for Edible Protein of Animal Origin—A Review
Previous Article in Journal
The Need for Formal Evidence Synthesis in Food Policy: A Case Study of Willingness-to-Pay
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Animals 2017, 7(3), 24; doi:10.3390/ani7030024

Conscientious Objection to Animal Experimentation in Italian Universities

1
Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate (DISC), Università di Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy
2
Unità Operativa di Chirurgia Plastica e Ricostruttiva, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino -IST Genova, 16132 Genoa, Italy
3
Dipartimento di Antichità, Filosofia, Storia, Geografia (DAFIST), Università di Genova, 16126 Genova, Italy
4
Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale (DIMES), Università di Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy
5
School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Verona, P.le L. A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy
6
Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute (DISSAL), Università di Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Clive J. C. Phillips
Received: 15 October 2016 / Revised: 28 February 2017 / Accepted: 4 March 2017 / Published: 13 March 2017
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [208 KB, uploaded 13 March 2017]

Abstract

In Italy, Law 413/1993 states that public and private Italian Institutions, including academic faculties, are obliged to fully inform workers and students about their right to conscientious objection to scientific or educational activities involving animals, hereafter written as “animal CO”. However, little monitoring on the faculties’ compliance with this law has been performed either by the government or other institutional bodies. Based on this premise, the authors have critically reviewed the existing data and compared them with those emerging from their own investigation to discuss limitations and inconsistencies. The results of this investigation revealed that less than half of Italian academic faculties comply with their duty to inform on animal CO. Non-compliance may substantially affect the right of students to make ethical choices in the field of animal ethics and undermines the fundamental right to express their own freedom of thought. The Italian Ministry of Education, Universities and Research, ethics committees and animal welfare bodies should cooperate to make faculties respect this law. Further research is needed to better understand the reasons for the current trend, as well as to promote the enforcement of Law 413/1993 with particular regard to information on animal CO. View Full-Text
Keywords: animal ethics; 3Rs; conscientious objection; veterinary education; science education; non-animal methods animal ethics; 3Rs; conscientious objection; veterinary education; science education; non-animal methods
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Baldelli, I.; Massaro, A.; Penco, S.; Bassi, A.M.; Patuzzo, S.; Ciliberti, R. Conscientious Objection to Animal Experimentation in Italian Universities. Animals 2017, 7, 24.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Animals EISSN 2076-2615 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top