Next Article in Journal
Animal Health and Welfare Issues Facing Organic Production Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Wildlife Warning Signs: Public Assessment of Components, Placement and Designs to Optimise Driver Response
Previous Article in Journal
Should Dogs and Cats be Given as Gifts?
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Framework to Evaluate Wildlife Feeding in Research, Wildlife Management, Tourism and Recreation
Animals 2013, 3(4), 1002-1020; doi:10.3390/ani3041002
Article

Stakeholder Perceptions of Threatened Species and Their Management on Urban Beaches

1,* , 2
 and 3
Received: 28 August 2013; in revised form: 21 October 2013 / Accepted: 21 October 2013 / Published: 24 October 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Wildlife Management)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [242 KB, uploaded 24 October 2013]   |   Browse Figures
Simple Summary: Coastal urbanisation brings humans into contact with beach-dwelling wildlife. Where wildlife are disturbance prone, active management is required to promote coexistence between beach-goers and endangered wildlife. Coexistence relies on people adopting wildlife-sensitive behaviours. This study examines factors, which influence people’s awareness and perceptions of threatened species management in southern Australia, using Hooded Plover Thinornis rubricollis management as a model. The inconvenience experienced by beach goers in regard to plover management was low. Awareness and support for plover conservation were high. Frequency of beach use, whether a person was a dog walker, and awareness of the species and its plight, influenced perceptions.
Abstract: We surveyed 579 recreationists regarding management of the threatened, beach-dwelling Hooded Plover Thinornis rubricollis. We postulated that: (1) lower awareness of the species and higher ‘inconvenience’ of management would engender less favourable perceptions of conservation and management; and (2) that frequency of beach use and dog ownership may mediate perceptions and levels of awareness and inconvenience. Overall, inconvenience was low while awareness and support for plover conservation were high. Education and awareness strategies were considered less effective than regulations; exclusion and regulations were considered less desirable than on-ground protective measures. Awareness, frequency of beach use and dog walking did not influence the perceived effectiveness of different managements. More frequent beach users had greater awareness of the species and their plight but reported greater inconvenience associated with management. Respondents with high awareness rated the severity of human-related threats higher; low awareness was associated with more inconvenience associated with on-ground protection, and exclusion and regulations. Dog walkers reported more inconvenience associated with exclusions and regulations than non-dog walkers. Dog walkers who used the beach infrequently rated threats significantly higher than frequent beach users. Conservation and education strategies could usefully be tailored to beach users’ level of use and pet ownership.
Keywords: Hooded Plover; regulation; education; recreationists; sandy shores; wildlife; dogs Hooded Plover; regulation; education; recreationists; sandy shores; wildlife; dogs
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Maguire, G.S.; Rimmer, J.M.; Weston, M.A. Stakeholder Perceptions of Threatened Species and Their Management on Urban Beaches. Animals 2013, 3, 1002-1020.

AMA Style

Maguire GS, Rimmer JM, Weston MA. Stakeholder Perceptions of Threatened Species and Their Management on Urban Beaches. Animals. 2013; 3(4):1002-1020.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maguire, Grainne S.; Rimmer, James M.; Weston, Michael A. 2013. "Stakeholder Perceptions of Threatened Species and Their Management on Urban Beaches." Animals 3, no. 4: 1002-1020.


Animals EISSN 2076-2615 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert