Next Article in Journal
Understanding Vocalization Might Help to Assess Stressful Conditions in Piglets
Previous Article in Journal
Searching for Animal Sentience: A Systematic Review of the Scientific Literature
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Animals 2013, 3(3), 907-922; doi:10.3390/ani3030907

Critical Analysis of Assessment Studies of the Animal Ethics Review Process

Laboratory Animal Science Group, IBMC (Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular), Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 823, 4150-180 Porto, Portugal
This article is based on a presentation-discussion given by Orsolya Varga at the Minding Animals Conference in Utrecht in 2012.
Received: 28 April 2013 / Revised: 27 August 2013 / Accepted: 29 August 2013 / Published: 4 September 2013
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [101 KB, uploaded 4 September 2013]

Simple Summary

In many countries, the approval of animal research projects depends on the decisions of the ethics committees which review the projects. Since the efficiency of the protection of experimental animals greatly depends on the performance of the ethics committees, its regular assessment is crucial. This paper reviews the results of studies assessing the performance of the ethics committees, and emphasizes the importance of outcome assessment in the evaluation of the performance of ethics committees.


In many countries the approval of animal research projects depends on the decisions of Animal Ethics Committees (AEC’s), which review the projects. An animal ethics review is performed as part of the authorization process and therefore performed routinely, but comprehensive information about how well the review system works is not available. This paper reviews studies that assess the performance of animal ethics committees by using Donabedian’s structure-process-outcome model. The paper points out that it is well recognised that AECs differ in structure, in their decision-making methods, in the time they take to review proposals and that they also make inconsistent decisions. On the other hand, we know little about the quality of outcomes, and to what extent decisions have been incorporated into daily scientific activity, and we know almost nothing about how well AECs work from the animal protection point of view. In order to emphasise this viewpoint in the assessment of AECs, the paper provides an example of measures for outcome assessment. The animal suffering is considered as a potential measure for outcome assessment of the ethics review. Although this approach has limitations, outcome assessment would significantly increase our understanding of the performance of AECs. View Full-Text
Keywords: Animal Ethics Committees; outcome assessment; benefits Animal Ethics Committees; outcome assessment; benefits
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Varga, O. Critical Analysis of Assessment Studies of the Animal Ethics Review Process. Animals 2013, 3, 907-922.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Animals EISSN 2076-2615 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top