Next Article in Journal
Goat Production, Supply Chains, Challenges, and Opportunities for Development in Vietnam: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Vitamin D Alleviates Cadmium-Induced Inhibition of Chicken Bone Marrow Stromal Cells’ Osteogenic Differentiation In Vitro
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Association Study of Lactation Traits in Chinese Holstein Cows in Southern China

1
College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
2
National Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Livestock and Poultry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
3
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510640, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2023, 13(15), 2545; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13152545
Submission received: 25 June 2023 / Revised: 4 August 2023 / Accepted: 6 August 2023 / Published: 7 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Lactation traits are economically important traits in dairy production, with milk yield, milk fat percentage, and milk protein percentage being the main indicators of cow performance and milk quality. The interaction between environment and genetics has a great influence on the performance of dairy cows. Cows are susceptible to heat stress under conditions of high temperature and humidity, which in turn affects lactation traits. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify single-nucleotide polymorphism loci and candidate genes related to lactation traits in Holstein dairy cows under conditions of high temperature and high humidity in southern China. Our study identified 23 single-nucleotide polymorphic sites significantly associated with lactation traits, and 10 key candidate genes associated with lactation traits. The results of this study may provide a theoretical basis for the molecular marker breeding of Chinese Holstein cows in high-temperature and high-humidity environments in southern China.

Abstract

Lactation traits are economically important for dairy cows. Southern China has a high-temperature and high-humidity climate, and environmental and genetic interactions greatly impact dairy cattle performance. The aim of this study was to identify novel single-nucleotide polymorphism sites and novel candidate genes associated with lactation traits in Chinese Holstein cows under high-temperature and humidity conditions in southern China. A genome-wide association study was performed for the lactation traits of 392 Chinese Holstein cows, using GGP Bovine 100 K SNP gene chips. Some 23 single nucleotide polymorphic loci significantly associated with lactation traits were screened. Among them, 16 were associated with milk fat rate, 7 with milk protein rate, and 3 with heat stress. A quantitative trait locus that significantly affects milk fat percentage in Chinese Holstein cows was identified within a window of approximately 0.5 Mb in the region of 0.4–0.9 Mb on Bos taurus autosome 14. According to Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analyses, ten genes (DGAT1, IDH2, CYP11B1, GFUS, CYC1, GPT, PYCR3, OPLAH, ALDH1A3, and NAPRT) associated with lactation fat percentage, milk yield, antioxidant activity, stress resistance, and inflammation and immune response were identified as key candidates for lactation traits. The results of this study will help in the development of an effective selection and breeding program for Chinese Holstein cows in high-temperature and humidity regions.

1. Introduction

Consumer demand for high-quality dairy products is increasing with improvements in the living standards of the population. Lactation traits are very important economic traits in dairy production [1]. Lactation traits such as milk yield (MY), milk fat percentage (FP), and milk protein percentage (PP) are the main indicators of cow productivity and milk quality [2,3]. Changes in the environment, especially high temperature and humidity, have a significant impact on cow production performance [4]. Southern China has a subtropical climate with long periods of high temperatures and high humidity, and cows are subjected to heat stress in such environments. The effects of heat stress on dairy production can be categorized into two different causes: effects caused by reduced voluntary feed intake due to heat stress, and direct physiological and metabolic effects of heat stress [5]. Heat stress reduces MY and alters FP and PP through both thus [6,7]. Heat stress has been shown to affect the expression of genes related to milk fat metabolism [8]. Genomic regions associated with heat tolerance in dairy cows (Bos taurus autosome (BTA)5, BTA14 and BTA15) were identified by Sigdel et al. [9].
Genome-wide association study (GWAS) plays an important role in dairy breeding by helping to identify key genes, speeding up the breeding process and improving the genetic improvement of target traits, and many candidate genes and variant sites associated with lactation traits have been identified in Chinese Holstein cows by using GWAS. GWAS analysis of five milk yield traits in a Chinese Holstein cow population was performed by Jiang et al. [10]. A total of 105 significant single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci were screened and localized to DGAT1, GHR, CYP11B1, ABCG2, and LGB. A GWAS was performed by Iung et al. [11] using 56,256 SNPs from 1067 cows to screen eight genes significantly associated with lactation traits. However, few GWAS have been reported for Chinese Holstein cows under high temperature and humidity conditions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify SNP sites and candidate genes related to lactation traits in Chinese Holstein dairy cows under high temperature and humidity conditions and provide a theoretical basis for molecular marker breeding of Chinese Holstein cows in high temperature and humidity environments.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal and Phenotypic Data

The Chinese Holstein cows used in the study were obtained from a dairy farm in Hezhou, Guangxi, China. The local climate is subtropical monsoon, with average annual temperatures ranging from 19.2 to 19.9 °C and average annual precipitation of 1558.1 to 2012.1 mm. All animals were raised under the same conditions, and healthy cows without diseases are screened according to the records of cattle diseases of pasture veterinarians. The experimental population consisted of 392 Chinese Holstein cows, and the pedigree of the cows can be traced back at least three generations. MY data were farm milk hall statistics. (For cows in the current lactation period with a lactation duration exceeding 305 days, the 305-day milk yield was determined based on actual statistical data. Conversely, for cows with a lactation duration less than 305 days, the 305-day milk yield was estimated using lactation curve analysis.) FP and PP were obtained by averaging five measurements after milk samples were collected by the farm each month and sent to Dairy Herd Improvement Center (DHI, China) and analyzed in the laboratory.

2.2. Genotyping and Quality Control

Blood samples were collected from the experimental cows, and DNA was extracted from the blood samples by using a Magnetic Universal Genomic DNA Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China). Genotyping was performed using the GGP Bovine 100 K SNP GeneChip on the Illumina iScan SNP microarray typing platform. Quality control was performed using the PLINK software (v1.9) [12], and the quality control criteria were (1) exclusion of SNPs at unknown locations and on sex chromosomes, (2) exclusion of individuals with SNP deletions greater than 5%, (3) exclusion of SNPs with detection rates less than 95%, (4) exclusion of SNPs with sub-allele frequencies less than 0.05, and (5) exclusion of SNPs that deviated from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (p < 1.0 × 10−6).

2.3. Phenotypic Data Processing

Phenotypic data for lactation traits were collated. Abnormal values that deviated from the phenotypic mean ± 3 times the standard deviation were excluded. Fixed-effect levels were classified as follows: calving age was divided into six levels, i.e., <24, 25–36, 37–48, 49–60, 61–72, and >72 months; parity was divided into five levels, from the first to the fifth parity; calving season was divided into four levels, November–February, March–April, September–October, and May–August according to the average maximum temperature of January–December in Guangxi Hezhou City.

2.4. Fixed-Effects ANOVA

A general linear model with the ANOVA function of R 4.1 software was used to perform ANOVA of the fixed effects. Three effects of calving month, calving season, and litter size were considered for lactation traits, and the model was as follows:
Y i j k l = μ + M o n t h i + S e a s o n j + P a r i t y k + e i j k l
where Yijkl is the observed value of lactation traits; μ is the population mean; Monthi is the calving age effect; Seasonj is the calving season effect; Parityk is the parity effect; and eijkl is the residual.

2.5. Estimation of Individual Breeding Values

The single-trait animal model of the DMUAI module of the derivative-free approach to multivariate analysis (DMU, Version 6) software was used to estimate the variance components of lactation traits for all individuals in the test population, and the variance-covariances of the obtained fixed effects were used as a priori values to calculate the estimated breeding values of the individuals by using the DMU4 module. The models for estimating the variance components of lactation traits were as follows:
Y = X z + W u + e
where Y is the observed value, z is the fixed effect (calving age, calving season, and parity), X is the correlation matrix of fixed effects, u is the random effect (individual ID), W is the correlation matrix of random effects, and e is the residual.

2.6. Population Structure and Kinship Identification

Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using Tassel 5.2.8 software to examine the existence of stratification in the test population. Based on the first three principal components of the PCA results, the population structure map was drawn using the ggplot package of R 4.1 software. On the basis of the population structure map, we observed whether the population was stratified and added the results of the first three principal components to the correlation analysis of the mixed linear model. The kinship matrix was constructed using Tassel 5.2.8 software with genotype data and visualized using R 4.1 software, and a kinship heat map was drawn to observe the existence of kinship between individuals. The kinship matrix results were added to the mixed linear model for association analysis.

2.7. Genome-Wide Association Study

In this study, individual estimated breeding values were used as phenotypes with Tassel 5.2.8 software and correlated with SNP gene chip typing data for analysis. The mixed linear model used in this experiment was as follows:
Y = S α + Q ν + Z u + e
where Y is the individual breeding value of lactation traits; α is the fixed effect of SNP markers; v is the population structure effect; u is the residual polygenic effect, u~N (0. 2 K σ a 2 ), where K is the kinship matrix and σ a 2 is the genetic variance; e is the residual; and S, Q, and Z are the association matrices of α, v, and u, respectively. The results obtained from the association analysis were corrected for multiple hypothesis testing using the Bonferroni method. Briefly, N (81,203) was the total number of filtered SNPs, and the genomic level significance (6.1574 × 10−7, 0.05/N) and chromosome level significance (1.2315 × 10−5, 1/N) were used as thresholds.

2.8. Identification of Candidate Genes and Functional Enrichment Analysis

In this study, Ensembl UMD3.1 (http://asia.ensembl.org/Bos_taurus/Info/Index/, accessed on 2 October 2021) database was used to locate genes within 1 Mb upstream and downstream of significant SNP sites. To better understand the biological processes, gene ontology (GO) terms and encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) pathways were annotated, visualized, and integrated for discovery on the basis of relevant genes by using the DAVID 6.8 database (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/, accessed on 18 October 2021). A p-value < 0.05 was the threshold for significant enrichment of GO terms and KEGG pathways.

3. Results

3.1. Descriptive Statistics and Estimated Breeding Values of Lactation Ttraits

Table 1 summarizes the descriptive statistics for the three lactation traits, MY, FP, and PP, of the test population with means of 9807.07, 3.54, and 3.19, respectively, and coefficients of variation (CV) of 15.64%, 13.56%, and 7.21%, respectively. Table 2 shows the results of the ANOVA for lactation trait fixed effects. From the results, it is clear that the calving age effect had a highly significant effect on MY and FP (p < 0.001) and no significant effect on PP. The parity effect had no significant effect on MY and PP and a significant effect on FP (p < 0.01). The calving season effect had a highly significant effect on both MY (p < 0.001) and FP (p < 0.01) and no significant effect on PP. Therefore, correction for calving age and calving season effects was required to estimate MY individual breeding values, and correction for calving age, parity, and calving season effects was required to estimate FP individual breeding values, while no correction for fixed effects was performed for PP individual breeding values. The statistical results of the estimated breeding values for the lactation traits MY, FP, and PP are shown in Table 3, with means of 70.25, −0.03, and −0.01 and estimated heritability of 0.07, 0.12, and 0.20, respectively.

3.2. Population Stratification

The PCA results (Figure 1A) showed that the test population was divided into several subpopulations of different sizes with significant stratification. Therefore, the results of PCA were included as covariates in the association analysis model and population stratification based on the results of PCA analysis was considered in the mixed linear model. The kinship mapping is shown in Figure 1B. Many individuals in the test population were related to each other, and there were eight larger families consisting of many related individuals. Therefore, the kinship of individuals within the test population needed to be considered in the association analysis, and the effect of kinship between individuals on the association analysis results was corrected by including the kinship matrix as a random effect in the mixed linear model of association analysis.

3.3. Genome-Wide Association Results

The Manhattan plot and quantile–quantile plot (Q-Q plot) of the association analysis are shown in Figure 2. According to the Manhattan plot, numerous SNP loci significantly associated with the FP trait were located on BTA14. These significant loci form peaks of SNP loci, as observed from the results. Combined with Table 4, it can be inferred that these significant loci were mainly situated within a 0.5 Mb window ranging from 0.4 to 0.9 Mb on BTA14, with a total of 15 significant SNP loci, which was the smallest range and the most concentrated distribution of SNP loci in this association analysis. Based on the principle of linkage disequilibrium, it is possible that some of these significant SNP loci were false positives, showing strong linkage disequilibrium with the true associated SNP loci, leading to significant results. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehensively discuss these loci considering their physical positions, associated genes, and previous studies. Regarding the SNP loci significantly associated with the PP trait, they primarily resided in a 2 Mb window on BTA11 (3 SNPs). On the other hand, the three significant SNP loci on BTA21 were relatively scattered. No significant SNP loci associated with the MY trait were identified in this study. Observing the Manhattan plot and Q-Q plot of the MY trait, it can be observed that the Q-Q plot of the MY trait exhibited a good fit. This may be attributed to the conservative correction imposed by the Bonferroni method in multiple hypothesis testing, which could filter out some SNP loci that might have significant associations with the MY trait, particularly for large-scale chip data. Another possibility is that the lack of association between the MY trait and significant SNP loci could be due to the relatively small sample size in the association analysis.
Table 4 results demonstrate that a total of 23 SNP loci were found to be significantly associated with lactation traits in this study, with 13 SNP loci showing significance at the genome level (p < 6.1574 × 10−7) and 10 SNP loci exhibiting significance at the chromosome level (p < 1.2315 × 10−5). Among the SNP loci associated with FP trait, there were a total of 16 loci, with 15 of them located on BTA14. The most significantly associated SNP with the FP trait was identified as ARS-BFGL-NGS-4939, which is situated within the diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 gene (DGAT1). Within the PLEC gene, two SNP loci were found to be significantly associated with the FP trait. For the PP trait, a total of 7 SNP loci were significantly associated, including 3 loci on BTA11, all located within the SNRNP200 gene, and 3 loci on BTA21, respectively, within the CERS3, AP3S2, and GABRA5 genes. The most significantly associated SNP with the MP trait was identified as Hapmap32084-BTA-147824, which is situated within the CERS3 gene.

3.4. GO and KEGG Analyses for Lactation Traits

We performed GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis on a total of 145 genes located within a 1 Mb range upstream and downstream of the significant SNP loci. GO analysis revealed a significant enrichment (p < 0.05) for a total of 45 GO terms, including 16 biological process terms, 4 cellular component terms, and 25 molecular function terms (Figure 3, Table S1 and Table 5). The KEGG pathways analysis revealed that three pathways were enriched. Among them, two pathways (bta01100: Metabolic pathways and bta00480: glutathione metabolism) were significantly enriched, whereas the third pathway (bta01230: biosynthesis of amino acids) did not have a significant p-value (p = 0.067; Table 4). IDH2 was enriched in three pathways; ANPEP, OPLAH, GPT, and PYCR3 were enriched in two pathways.

4. Discussion

High-temperature and -humidity environments can contribute to metabolic imbalances and cause heat stress in cows, who experience a range of physiological and behavioral responses under heat stress conditions [8]. Heat stress decreases dry matter intake, affects nutrient metabolic activity, and reduces MY, FP, and PP in cows [4,6]. Heat stress not only affects milk production and quality, it also affects the overall health of the cow, affecting normal physiology, metabolism, hormones, and the immune system [13]. In this study, GWAS analysis was performed for lactation traits in Holstein cows under high temperature and high humidity conditions in Southern China. The GWAS results obtained 23 SNP loci that were significantly associated with lactation traits. Of the significantly associated SNPs, 16 were associated with FP and 7 were associated with PP. No SNPs significantly associated with MY traits were obtained, which indicates the limitations of this study, such as the sample size of the test population and the restricted genotyping platform. Among the significantly associated SNPs, 11 loci were previously reported to be significantly associated with lactation traits. For example, a study found that Chr14_1765835, Chr14_1757935, Chr14_2022745, and Chr14_1653693 were significantly associated with MY and PP [14]. Other studies found that BovineHD1400000216, BovineHD1400000275, Bo-vineHD1400000206, BovineHD1400000204, and BovineHD1400000271 were significantly associated with MY, FP, and PP in dairy cows [15,16]. Among the 16 SNP sites significantly associated with FP, 14 SNP sites were located within a window of approximately 0.5 Mb between 0.4 and 0.9 Mb on BTA14, and 68 genes were associated within 1 Mb upstream and downstream of this window. Numerous studies have shown the presence of a large number of quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and variant sites that affect lactation traits in dairy cows in the range of 0.4 to 0.9 Mb on BTA14. A SNP locus (rs137205809) which significantly affects FP was found at 0.7 Mb of BTA14 [17]. A large number of SNP sites significantly related to FP were found at 0.7 Mb of BTA14 [18]. Pausch et al. [19] performed targeted sequence padding of four candidate causal variant locus regions and association analysis of milk components and successfully identified SNP sites at 0.6 Mb on BTA14 that were significantly associated with FP. These findings are very close to the results of the present study, so QTLs that significantly affect FP in Chinese Holstein cows can be hypothesized to exist within a window of approximately 0.5 Mb between 0.4 and 0.9 Mb on BTA14.
In this study, novel SNP loci associated with lactation traits were discovered and have not been previously reported. Among these loci, the most significant one was Chr14_1699016 (p = 8.36 × 10−8), which is located 384 bp away from VPS28 on BTA14 and approximately 37 kb away from the previously reported BovineHD1400000216 locus. Some studies have reported that VPS28 gene was highly expressed in breast tissue and significantly associated with FP [10,20]. The SNP loci BovineHD1400000282 and BovineHD1400000287 are located within the PLEC gene on chromosome 14, which has been reported to play a crucial role in lactation processes [21]. Furthermore, studies have suggested that the PLEC gene may be associated with disease resistance or alleviation of heat stress [22]. DB-813-seq-rs110906821 is located on BTA14 at 1844 bp away from the EXOSC4 gene, which has been reported to be significantly associated with colostrum and serum protein concentrations in Chinese Holstein cows [23]. BovineHD1200022127 is located within the HS6ST3 gene on BTA12, a member of the gene family involved in heparin metabolism. Heparin decreases the rate of lipoprotein lipase degradation in adipocytes and promotes adipocyte differentiation [24]. ARS-BFGL-NGS-4300 is located within the AP3S2 gene on BTA21. A previous study found that AP3S2 expression was significantly upregulated in Sahiwal cattle at 4, 24, and 48 h after heat stress, suggesting that the AP3S2 gene may be associated with heat stress [25]. BovineHD2100000735 is located within the GABRA5 gene on BTA21. GABRA5 is a subunit of gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptor, which plays a crucial role in maintaining ion balance. Ion balance is vital for lactation in cows [26]. In conclusion, the three newly discovered heat stress-related SNP loci (BovineHD1400000282, BovineHD1400000287, and ARS-BFGL-NGS-4300) identified in this study are potentially associated with lactation traits in cows under heat stress conditions.
In this study, the biological processes, cellular components and molecular functions obtained from GO analysis did not directly affect lactation traits. KEGG analysis identified 16 genes (DGAT1, CYC1, CERS3, GPAA1, IDH2, GPT, PYCR3, OPLAH, HDDC3, ALDH1A3, MAN2A2, NAPRT, CYP11B1, ANPEP, GPAT2, and GFUS) that were enriched in three pathways, namely metabolic pathways, glutathione metabolism, and biosynthesis of amino acids. Metabolic pathways are crucial for lactation in cows [15], while glutathione plays a significant role in antioxidant stress response and nutrient metabolism [27]. Moreover, amino acid biosynthesis serves as an important source of protein in milk [28]. Numerous studies have reported the association between the DGAT1 gene and milk fat synthesis [29,30]. Furthermore, the DGAT1 gene is a major gene in inflammatory response and lipid metabolism, encoding an enzyme that catalyzes the last step of triacylglycerol synthesis [31], and significantly affecting energy metabolism during lactation in dairy cows [32]. The CYC1 gene encodes a subunit of the cytochrome bc1 complex, which is associated with redox processes, and it has been reported that the CYC1 gene is an important candidate for albumin synthesis [23]. Albumin is known to have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant functions [33], so the CYC1 gene may be associated with anti-inflammatory responses. The IDH2 gene encodes isocitrate dehydrogenase. In the absence of ATP-citrate lyase, ruminants can use isocitrate dehydrogenase to form NADPH, which raises energy for cells, and the excess energy is converted to fatty acids, which are then stored as fat [34]. GWAS analysis and pathway analysis of fat deposition traits in Nello cattle revealed the relationship between IDH2 gene and fat deposition [35]. The GPT gene encodes glutamic-pyruvate transaminase. Habeeb et al. [36] conducted a study comparing the physiological and biochemical changes in Egyptian native cows and introduced cows under hot summer conditions, finding that serum levels of glutamate aminotransferase were significantly higher in native cows than in introduced cows under hot conditions, suggesting that the GPT gene may be associated with heat stress in dairy cows. The PYCR3 gene encodes a protein belonging to the pyrroline-5-carboxylic acid reductase family, which has been shown to be involved in genotoxic, inflammatory, and oxidative stress responses [37,38]. The OPLAH gene encodes an enzyme involved in the γ-glutamyl cycle and is responsible for converting the degradation product of glutathione, 5-oxoproline, back to glutamate [39]. Since 5-oxoproline is an oxidative stress inducer [40], OPLAH functions as an anti-oxidative stress agent by removing this metabolite. Many studies have identified the OPLAH gene as a candidate gene for milk yield traits in Holstein cows [14,41]. The ALDH1A3 gene encodes the third enzyme of the aldehyde dehydrogenase family 1, which is involved in the conversion of retinaldehyde to retinoic acid and has detoxifying and antioxidant functions [42]. The NAPRT gene encodes nicotinic acid phosphate ribosyltransferase, which has a key role in the acute inflammatory response [43]. The CYP11B1 gene encodes steroid 11-β-hydroxylase, which is involved in steroid hormone biosynthesis. Many studies have shown that the CYP11B1 gene is associated with milk yield and milk fat percentage in dairy cows [44]. The GFUS gene encodes GDP-L-amylose synthase, which is involved in inflammatory and immune responses by activating the immune network [45], and it has also been shown that GFUS is associated with milk protein percentage and milk albumin content in dairy cows [23,46]. Heat stress affects the anti-inflammatory response and immune function of cows by reducing the production of antibodies, cytokines, chemokines, and heat shock proteins [47]. In addition, cows exposed to heat stress have shown reduced MY and FP as well as PP [6]. In this study, GWAS analysis of lactation traits in Chinese Holstein cows under high temperature and humidity in Southern China was performed to screen for genes reported to be directly related to lactation traits (DGAT1, IDH2, CYP11B1, and GFUS) and candidate genes not reported to be directly related to lactation traits but associated with antioxidant, anti-stress, inflammatory, immune response, and detoxification processes (CYC1, GPT, PYCR3, OPLAH, ALDH1A3, NAPRT, and GFUS).

5. Conclusions

In summary, this study screened 23 SNPs that were significantly associated with lactation traits in Chinese Holstein cows in the high temperature and humidity region of Southern China. Among them, three SNPs were associated with heat stress. In addition, this study identified QTLs that significantly affected milk fat percentage in Chinese Holstein cows within a window of approximately 0.5 Mb between 0.4 and 0.9 Mb on BTA14. Ten most promising candidate genes (DGAT1, IDH2, CYP11B1, GFUS, CYC1, GPT, PYCR3, OPLAH, ALDH1A3, and NAPRT) were revealed based on KEGG analysis. The results of this study are useful for molecular marker-assisted breeding of lactation traits in Chinese Holstein cows under high temperature and humidity regions to accelerate genetic improvement.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani13152545/s1, Table S1: GO analysis of regional candidate genes for lactation traits.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S., X.L., D.L. and Y.L.; methodology, M.S. and X.L.; software, M.S.; validation, M.S., X.L. and Z.X.; formal analysis, M.S. and X.L.; investigation, M.S. and X.L.; resources, Z.X., Y.S., M.D., G.L., B.S. and Y.G.; data curation, M.S. and X.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S.; writing—review and editing, Z.X., Y.S., M.D., G.L., B.S. and Y.G.; visualization, M.S. and X.L.; supervision, D.L. and Y.L.; project administration, D.L. and Y.L.; funding acquisition, D.L. and Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Guangdong Provincial Key Research and Development Programme (2022B0202090003) and GuangDong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation-Enterprise (Wens) Joint Fund (2019B1515210017).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of South China Agricultural University (SCAU, Guangzhou, China; Approval number: 2021g018). All animals used in this study met the guidelines for the care and use of experimental animals established by the Ministry of Agriculture of China.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The variation data reported in this paper have been deposited in the genome variation map (GVM) in National Genomics Data Center, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and China National Center for Bioinformation, under accession number GVM000516 (https://bigd.big.ac.cn/gvm/getProjectDetail?Project=GVM000516, accessed on 8 April 2023).

Acknowledgments

We thank Wen’s Hezhou Dairy Farm (Hezhou, China) for their assistance with our studies.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kahi, A.K.; Nitter, G. Developing breeding schemes for pasture based dairy production systems in Kenya: I. Derivation of economic values using profit functions. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2004, 88, 161–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Qian, L.; Zhao, A.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, T.; Zeisel, S.H.; Jia, W.; Cai, W. Metabolomic Approaches to Explore Chemical Diversity of Human Breast-Milk, Formula Milk and Bovine Milk. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Chen, S.; Chai, M.; Tian, C.; Li, Y.; Deng, T.; Wu, H.; Liu, X. Genetic variants of fatty acid elongase 6 in Chinese Holstein cow. Gene 2018, 670, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. West, J.W. Effects of Heat-Stress on Production in Dairy Cattle. J. Dairy. Sci. 2003, 86, 2131–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cowley, F.C.; Barber, D.G.; Houlihan, A.V.; Poppi, D.P. Immediate and residual effects of heat stress and restricted intake on milk protein and casein composition and energy metabolism. J. Dairy. Sci. 2015, 98, 2356–2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Gorniak, T.; Meyer, U.; Südekum, K.H.; Dänicke, S. Impact of mild heat stress on dry matter intake, milk yield and milk composition in mid-lactation Holstein dairy cows in a temperate climate. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2014, 68, 358–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, L.; Yang, Q.; Yi, M.; Pang, Z.H.; Xiong, B.H. Effects of seasonal change and parity on raw milk composition and related indices in Chinese Holstein cows in northern China. J. Dairy. Sci. 2013, 96, 6863–6869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, D.; Chen, Z.; Zhuang, X.; Luo, J.; Chen, T.; Xi, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, J. Identification of circRNA-Associated-ceRNA Networks Involved in Milk Fat Metabolism under Heat Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sigdel, A.; Abdollahi-Arpanahi, R.; Aguilar, I.; Peñagaricano, F. Whole Genome Mapping Reveals Novel Genes and Pathways Involved in Milk Production Under Heat Stress in US Holstein Cows. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, L.; Liu, J.; Sun, D.; Ma, P.; Ding, X.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, Q. Genome wide association studies for milk production traits in Chinese Holstein population. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e13661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Iung, L.H.S.; Petrini, J.; Ramírez-Díaz, J.; Salvian, M.; Rovadoscki, G.A.; Pilonetto, F.; Dauria, B.D.; Machado, P.F.; Coutinho, L.L.; Wiggans, G.R.; et al. Genome-wide association study for milk production traits in a Brazilian Holstein population. J. Dairy. Sci. 2019, 102, 5305–5314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Purcell, S.; Neale, B.; Todd-Brown, K.; Thomas, L.; Ferreira, M.A.; Bender, D.; Maller, J.; Sklar, P.; de Bakker, P.I.; Daly, M.J.; et al. PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 81, 559–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Ranjitkar, S.; Bu, D.; Van Wijk, M.; Ma, Y.; Ma, L.; Zhao, L.; Shi, J.; Liu, C.; Xu, J. Will heat stress take its toll on milk production in China? Clim. Chang. 2020, 161, 637–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, T.; Li, J.; Gao, X.; Song, W.; Chen, C.; Yao, D.; Ma, J.; Xu, L.; Ma, Y. Genome-wide association study of milk components in Chinese Holstein cows using single nucleotide polymorphism. Livest. Sci. 2020, 233, 103951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nayeri, S.; Sargolzaei, M.; Abo-Ismail, M.K.; May, N.; Miller, S.P.; Schenkel, F.; Moore, S.S.; Stothard, P. Genome-wide association for milk production and female fertility traits in Canadian dairy Holstein cattle. BMC Genet. 2016, 17, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Nayeri, S.; Sargolzaei, M.; Abo-Ismail, M.K.; Miller, S.; Schenkel, F.; Moore, S.S.; Stothard, P. Genome-wide association study for lactation persistency, female fertility, longevity, and lifetime profit index traits in Holstein dairy cattle. J. Dairy. Sci. 2017, 100, 1246–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Wang, D.; Ning, C.; Liu, J.F.; Zhang, Q.; Jiang, L. Short communication: Replication of genome-wide association studies for milk production traits in Chinese Holstein by an efficient rotated linear mixed model. J. Dairy. Sci. 2019, 102, 2378–2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Prakapenka, D.; Liang, Z.; Jiang, J.; Ma, L.; Da, Y. A Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study of Epistasis Effects of Production Traits and Daughter Pregnancy Rate in U.S. Holstein Cattle. Genes 2021, 12, 1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pausch, H.; Wurmser, C.; Reinhardt, F.; Emmerling, R.; Fries, R. Short communication: Validation of 4 candidate causative trait variants in 2 cattle breeds using targeted sequence imputation. J. Dairy. Sci. 2015, 98, 4162–4167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Jiang, L.; Liu, X.; Yang, J.; Wang, H.; Jiang, J.; Liu, L.; He, S.; Ding, X.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Q. Targeted resequencing of GWAS loci reveals novel genetic variants for milk production traits. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Jiang, J.; Ma, L.; Prakapenka, D.; VanRaden, P.M.; Cole, J.B.; Da, Y. A Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study in U.S. Holstein Cattle. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yang, Z.; Lian, Z.; Liu, G.; Deng, M.; Sun, B.; Guo, Y.; Liu, D.; Li, Y. Identification of genetic markers associated with milk production traits in Chinese Holstein cattle based on post genome-wide association studies. Anim. Biotechnol. 2021, 32, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lin, S.; Wan, Z.; Zhang, J.; Xu, L.; Han, B.; Sun, D. Genome-Wide Association Studies for the Concentration of Albumin in Colostrum and Serum in Chinese Holstein. Animals 2020, 10, 2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jiang, Z.; Michal, J.J.; Wu, X.L.; Pan, Z.; MacNeil, M.D. The heparan and heparin metabolism pathway is involved in regulation of fatty acid composition. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2011, 7, 659–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Mehla, K.; Magotra, A.; Choudhary, J.; Singh, A.K.; Mohanty, A.K.; Upadhyay, R.C.; Srinivasan, S.; Gupta, P.; Choudhary, N.; Antony, B.; et al. Genome-wide analysis of the heat stress response in Zebu (Sahiwal) cattle. Gene 2014, 533, 500–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Silanikove, N.; Maltz, E.; Halevi, A.; Shinder, D. Metabolism of Water, Sodium, Potassium, and Chlorine by High Yielding Dairy Cows at the Onset of Lactation. J. Dairy. Sci. 1997, 80, 949–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, G.; Fang, Y.Z.; Yang, S.; Lupton, J.R.; Turner, N.D. Glutathione metabolism and its implications for health. J. Nutr. 2004, 134, 489–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Osorio, J.S.; Lohakare, J.; Bionaz, M. Biosynthesis of milk fat, protein, and lactose: Roles of transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation. Physiol. Genom. 2016, 48, 231–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Thaller, G.; Krämer, W.; Winter, A.; Kaupe, B.; Erhardt, G.; Fries, R. Effects of DGAT1 variants on milk production traits in German cattle breeds. J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 81, 1911–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schennink, A.; Stoop, W.M.; Visker, M.H.; Heck, J.M.; Bovenhuis, H.; van der Poel, J.J.; van Valenberg, H.J.; van Arendonk, J.A. DGAT1 underlies large genetic variation in milk-fat composition of dairy cows. Anim. Genet. 2007, 38, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cases, S.; Smith, S.J.; Zheng, Y.W.; Myers, H.M.; Lear, S.R.; Sande, E.; Novak, S.; Collins, C.; Welch, C.B.; Lusis, A.J.; et al. Identification of a gene encoding an acyl CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase, a key enzyme in triacylglycerol synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 13018–13023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bhattarai, D.; Dad, R.; Worku, T.; Xu, S.; Ullah, F.; Zhang, M.; Liang, X.; Den, T.; Fan, M.; Zhang, S. The functions and mechanisms of sequence differences of DGAT1 gene on milk fat synthesis between dairy cow and buffalo. J. Dairy. Res. 2020, 87, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Aragão, D.P.; da Silva Souza, B.; de Brito, T.V.; de Araújo Bastos Santana, L.; de Paiva Silva, R.M.; de Oliveira, A.P.; da Cunha Pereira, A.C.T.; Ferreira, G.P.; Dos Reis Barbosa, A.L.; de Oliveira, J.S. The anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive activity of albumins from Crotalaria retusa seeds. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 93, 536–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Metallo, C.M.; Gameiro, P.A.; Bell, E.L.; Mattaini, K.R.; Yang, J.; Hiller, K.; Jewell, C.M.; Johnson, Z.R.; Irvine, D.J.; Guarente, L.; et al. Reductive glutamine metabolism by IDH1 mediates lipogenesis under hypoxia. Nature 2011, 481, 380–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Martins, R.; Machado, P.C.; Pinto, L.F.B.; Silva, M.R.; Schenkel, F.S.; Brito, L.F.; Pedrosa, V.B. Genome-wide association study and pathway analysis for fat deposition traits in nellore cattle raised in pasture-based systems. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2021, 138, 360–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Marai, I.F.; Habeeb, A.A.; Farghaly, H.M. Productive, physiological and biochemical changes in imported and locally born Friesian and Holstein lactating cows under hot summer conditions of Egypt. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 1999, 31, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kuo, M.L.; Lee, M.B.; Tang, M.; den Besten, W.; Hu, S.; Sweredoski, M.J.; Hess, S.; Chou, C.M.; Changou, C.A.; Su, M.; et al. PYCR1 and PYCR2 Interact and Collaborate with RRM2B to Protect Cells from Overt Oxidative Stress. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 18846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Phang, J.M.; Pandhare, J.; Liu, Y. The metabolism of proline as microenvironmental stress substrate. J. Nutr. 2008, 138, 2008s–2015s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Liu, Y.; Hyde, A.S.; Simpson, M.A.; Barycki, J.J. Emerging regulatory paradigms in glutathione metabolism. Adv. Cancer Res. 2014, 122, 69–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Pederzolli, C.D.; Sgaravatti, A.M.; Braum, C.A.; Prestes, C.C.; Zorzi, G.K.; Sgarbi, M.B.; Wyse, A.T.; Wannmacher, C.M.; Wajner, M.; Dutra-Filho, C.S. 5-Oxoproline reduces non-enzymatic antioxidant defenses in vitro in rat brain. Metab. Brain Dis. 2007, 22, 51–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lu, X.; Arbab, A.A.I.; Abdalla, I.M.; Liu, D.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, T.; Su, G.; Yang, Z. Genetic Parameter Estimation and Genome-Wide Association Study-Based Loci Identification of Milk-Related Traits in Chinese Holstein. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 799664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hsu, L.C.; Chang, W.C.; Shibuya, A.; Yoshida, A. Human stomach aldehyde dehydrogenase cDNA and genomic cloning, primary structure, and expression in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 3030–3037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Audrito, V.; Messana, V.G.; Deaglio, S. NAMPT and NAPRT: Two Metabolic Enzymes With Key Roles in Inflammation. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Wibowo, T.A.; Gaskins, C.T.; Newberry, R.C.; Thorgaard, G.H.; Michal, J.J.; Jiang, Z. Genome assembly anchored QTL map of bovine chromosome 14. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2008, 4, 406–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Wang, L.; Huang, J.; Jiang, M.; Lin, H. Tissue-specific transplantation antigen P35B (TSTA3) immune response-mediated metabolism coupling cell cycle to postreplication repair network in no-tumor hepatitis/cirrhotic tissues (HBV or HCV infection) by biocomputation. Immunol. Res. 2012, 52, 258–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Buaban, S.; Lengnudum, K.; Boonkum, W.; Phakdeedindan, P. Genome-wide association study on milk production and somatic cell score for Thai dairy cattle using weighted single-step approach with random regression test-day model. J. Dairy. Sci. 2022, 105, 468–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bagath, M.; Krishnan, G.; Devaraj, C.; Rashamol, V.P.; Pragna, P.; Lees, A.M.; Sejian, V. The impact of heat stress on the immune system in dairy cattle: A review. Res. Vet. Sci. 2019, 126, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) The PCA plot of top two principal components. (B) The kinship matrix diagram.
Figure 1. (A) The PCA plot of top two principal components. (B) The kinship matrix diagram.
Animals 13 02545 g001
Figure 2. Manhattan plots and Q–Q plots from GWAS for MY, FP, and PP traits in Chinese Holstein cows. (A) MY: milk yield; (B) FP: milk fat percentage; (C) PP: milk protein percentage. In the Manhattan plot, above the blue horizontal line indicates a significant SNP chromosome level and above the red horizontal line indicates a significant SNP genomic level.
Figure 2. Manhattan plots and Q–Q plots from GWAS for MY, FP, and PP traits in Chinese Holstein cows. (A) MY: milk yield; (B) FP: milk fat percentage; (C) PP: milk protein percentage. In the Manhattan plot, above the blue horizontal line indicates a significant SNP chromosome level and above the red horizontal line indicates a significant SNP genomic level.
Animals 13 02545 g002
Figure 3. GO analysis of regional candidate genes for lactation traits.
Figure 3. GO analysis of regional candidate genes for lactation traits.
Animals 13 02545 g003
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of lactation traits 1.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of lactation traits 1.
TraitsnMeanMinMaxSDCV (%)
MY3929807.074870.4214205.581538.6015.64
FP3923.541.975.070.4813.56
PP3923.192.343.760.237.21
1 MY, milk yield; FP, milk fat percentage; PP, milk protein percentage. CV, coefficient of variation.
Table 2. Analysis of variance components of lactation traits phenotypes 1.
Table 2. Analysis of variance components of lactation traits phenotypes 1.
ItemMYFPPP
Calving age<0.001 ***<0.001 ***0.797
Parity0.1010.002 **0.296
Calving season<0.001 ***0.007 **0.054
1 MY, milk yield; FP, milk fat percentage; PP, milk protein percentage. ** indicates significant at the p < 0.01 level, and *** indicates significant at the p < 0.001 level.
Table 3. Statistics of the estimated breeding values for lactation traits 1.
Table 3. Statistics of the estimated breeding values for lactation traits 1.
TraitsnMeanMinMaxSDHeritability
MY39270.25−1013.321118.44408.940.07
FP392−0.03−0.450.410.160.12
PP392−0.01−0.340.260.100.20
1 MY, milk yield; FP, milk fat percentage; PP, milk protein percentage.
Table 4. Genome-wide significant SNPs associated with FP and PP traits and nearest candidate genes.
Table 4. Genome-wide significant SNPs associated with FP and PP traits and nearest candidate genes.
TraitsSNP NameBTAPosition (bp)p-ValueNearest Gene NameDistance (bp)
FPARS-BFGL-NGS-493914609,8702.85 × 10−9DGAT1Within
Chr14_176583514580,0192.96 × 10−9SLC52A2Within
BovineHD140000021614550,7843.12 × 10−9CPSF1Within
Chr14_175793514572,1202.74 × 10−8ADCK51622
Chr14_202274514831,0046.44 × 10−8GRINA938
Chr14_169901614513,2038.36 × 10−8VPS28384
BovineHD140000028214859,2519.51 × 10−8PLECWithin
BovineHD140000028714883,7329.51 × 10−8PLECWithin
BovineHD1400000275142,019,3901.00 × 10−7TSNARE1Within
ARS-BFGL-NGS-5782014465,7421.46 × 10−7FOXH13390
BovineHD140000020614494,6212.25 × 10−7TONSL1650
Chr14_165369314468,1242.52 × 10−7FOXH11008
BovineHD140000020414487,5273.05 × 10−7CYHR1Within
DB-813-seq-rs11090682114758,8548.04 × 10−7EXOSC41844
BovineHD12000221271273,935,0242.02 × 10−6HS6ST3Within
BovineHD140000027114810,1165.73 × 10−6SPATC13725
PPHapmap32084-BTA-147824216,095,4191.40 × 10−6CERS3Within
Hapmap25132-BTA-963911327,232,5352.37 × 10−6FZD8445,190
ARS-BFGL-NGS-43002121,278,4893.94 × 10−6AP3S2Within
ARS-BFGL-NGS-40264112,382,2616.04 × 10−6SNRNP200Within
BovineHD2100000735214,285,5758.19 × 10−6GABRA5Within
BovineHD1100000821112,385,2859.53 × 10−6SNRNP200Within
BovineHD1100000817112,381,6441.10 × 10−5SNRNP200Within
Table 5. KEGG analysis of regional candidate genes for lactation traits.
Table 5. KEGG analysis of regional candidate genes for lactation traits.
TermDescriptionGene Count%p-ValueGene
bta01100Metabolic pathways1611.10.03333CERS3, DGAT1, GPAA1, IDH2, GPT, PYCR3, OPLAH, HDDC3, ALDH1A3, MAN2A2, NAPRT, CYP11B1, ANPEP, CYC1, GPAT2, GFUS
bta00480Glutathione metabolism32.10.04989ANPEP, IDH2, OPLAH
bta01230Biosynthesis of amino acids32.10.06663IDH2, GPT, PYCR3
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Su, M.; Lin, X.; Xiao, Z.; She, Y.; Deng, M.; Liu, G.; Sun, B.; Guo, Y.; Liu, D.; Li, Y. Genome-Wide Association Study of Lactation Traits in Chinese Holstein Cows in Southern China. Animals 2023, 13, 2545. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13152545

AMA Style

Su M, Lin X, Xiao Z, She Y, Deng M, Liu G, Sun B, Guo Y, Liu D, Li Y. Genome-Wide Association Study of Lactation Traits in Chinese Holstein Cows in Southern China. Animals. 2023; 13(15):2545. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13152545

Chicago/Turabian Style

Su, Minqiang, Xiaojue Lin, Zupeng Xiao, Yuanhang She, Ming Deng, Guangbin Liu, Baoli Sun, Yongqing Guo, Dewu Liu, and Yaokun Li. 2023. "Genome-Wide Association Study of Lactation Traits in Chinese Holstein Cows in Southern China" Animals 13, no. 15: 2545. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13152545

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop