Next Article in Journal
Race-Level Reporting of Incidents during Two Seasons (2015/16 to 2016/17) of Thoroughbred Flat Racing in New Zealand
Previous Article in Journal
Cat Coat Color, Personality Traits and the Cat-Owner Relationship Scale: A Study with Cat Owners in Mexico
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integration of Microfluidics, Photonic Integrated Circuits and Data Acquisition and Analysis Methods in a Single Platform for the Detection of Swine Viral Diseases
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/ani12081031
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Occurrence and Molecular Characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in Dairy Cattle and Dairy Buffalo in Yunnan Province, Southwest China

by
Ying-Wen Meng
1,†,
Fan-Fan Shu
1,†,
Li-Hua Pu
1,
Yang Zou
2,
Jian-Fa Yang
1,
Feng-Cai Zou
1,
Xing-Quan Zhu
1,3,
Zhao Li
4,* and
Jun-Jun He
1,*
1
Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health of Yunnan Province, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou 730046, China
3
College of Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, China
4
State Key Laboratory of Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan, Center for Life Science, School of Life Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2022, 12(8), 1031; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12081031
Submission received: 6 February 2022 / Revised: 2 April 2022 / Accepted: 11 April 2022 / Published: 15 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epizootiology of Farm Animal Diseases)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Cryptosporidium spp. are important gastrointestinal pathogens of humans and animals, causing diarrheal diseases. Cattle are considered as one of the main reservoirs of Cryptosporidium for humans. We first report the occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle (14.7%, 65/442) and dairy buffalo (1.1%, 3/258) in Yunnan Province of China. The results of this study suggest that divergent Cryptosporidium spp. (such as C. andersoni, C. bovis, C. ryanae, and C. parvum) can be found in asymptomatic dairy cattle and dairy buffalo in Yunnan, China. The IIdA18G1 subtype of C. parvum, which infects humans and other animals, was also found in this study. Thus, attention should be paid towards preventing the transmission of Cryptosporidium spp. in cattle and humans in Yunnan Province.

Abstract

Cryptosporidium spp. are important foodborne and waterborne pathogens in humans and animals, causing diarrheal diseases. Cattle are one of the reservoirs of Cryptosporidium infection in humans. However, data on the occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. in cattle in Yunnan Province remains limited. A total of 700 fecal samples were collected from Holstein cows (n = 442) and dairy buffaloes (n = 258) in six counties of Yunnan Province. The occurrence and genotypes of Cryptosporidium spp. were analyzed using nested PCR and DNA sequencing. Furthermore, the C. andersoni isolates were further analyzed using multilocus sequence typing (MLST) at four gene loci (MS1, MS2, MS3, and MS16), and the C. parvum isolate was subtyped by 60-kDa glycoprotein (gp60) loci. The occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. in Holstein cows and dairy buffaloes was 14.7% (65/442) and 1.1% (3/258), respectively. Of these positive samples, 56 Holstein cow samples represented C. andersoni, four Holstein cow samples represented C. bovis, three Holstein cow samples represented C. ryanae, and one represented C. parvum. Meanwhile, only three dairy buffalo samples represented C. ryanae. MLST analysis of subtypes of C. andersoni detected four subtypes, including A5A4A2A1 (n = 7), A4A4A4A1 (n = 7), A1A4A4A1 (n = 2), and A4A4A2A1 (n = 1). One C. parvum isolate was identified as the IIdA18G1 subtype. These results revealed the high occurrence and high genetic diversity of Cryptosporidium spp. in Holstein cows in Yunnan Province, enriching the knowledge of the population genetic structure of Cryptosporidium spp. in Yunnan Province.

1. Introduction

Cryptosporidium spp. are important apicomplexan parasites, causing moderate-to-severe diarrhea in many vertebrates [1]. This parasite can be transmitted through the fecal–oral route and direct contact [2]. Traditionally, cattle are considered as the major reservoir for human and animal infection by Cryptosporidium spp. [3,4]. Many cryptosporidiosis cases have been reported in humans and calves around the world, even causing adverse effects on the dairy industry and public health [5,6,7].
At present, approximately 40 Cryptosporidium species and 100 genotypes have been identified, of which C. andersoni, C. bovis, C. ryanae, and C. parvum are the four most prevalent species that are responsible for cattle infection, and C. parvum is the main zoonotic species [8]. Numerous studies have shown that these four Cryptosporidium spp. present an age-related distribution in dairy cattle, with C. parvum being the predominant species in pre-weaned calves, causing significant diarrhea, C. bovis and C. ryanae usually infect post-weaned calves and yearlings, without obvious diarrhea, whereas C. andersoni is usually found in adult cattle with poor production performance [9,10,11]. Currently, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is a high-efficiency tool for typing C. muris and C. andersoni, while 14 MLST of C. andersoni subtypes have been reported in cattle [12,13,14,15]. At present, 10 MLST subtypes of C. andersoni have been recognized in cattle in China, of which A1A4A4A1 is a preponderant subtype [13,14,15,16]. Furthermore, the 60-kDa glycoprotein (gp60) is one of the prevalent typing gene markers for C. parvum genotypes [17]. Thus far, 15 subtype families of C. parvum have been reported, including IIa to IIi and IIk to IIp, in which the IIa and IId families are defined as zoonotic pathogens [17,18].
Cryptosporidium spp. infections in cattle have been reported in more than 24 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities of China [3,8,19]. In a small-scale survey of Yunling cattle in Yunnan Province, 0.77% cattle were infected with C. andersoni and C. ryanae [20]. However, little is known of the occurrence and subtypes of Cryptosporidium spp. infections in dairy cattle and dairy buffalo in Yunnan Province. Thus, the objectives of the present study were to perform a molecular epidemiological survey of the occurrence and subtypes of Cryptosporidium spp. in Holstein cows and dairy buffaloes to assess the zoonotic potential of Cryptosporidium spp. in cattle in Yunnan Province.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

In total, 700 fecal samples were collected from seven Holstein cow farms (n = 442) in four counties (Yiliang, Eryuan, Weishan, and Binchuan) and five crossbred dairy buffalo farms (n = 258) in two counties (Heqing, Tengchong) in Yunnan Province from June 2019 to August 2020 (Figure 1). All cattle of each farm were sampled. Each sample was collected from the rectum individually, using disposable plastic gloves, and was transferred separately into a disposable self-sealing bag with accurate label information. The animals were divided into four age groups, including pre-weaned calves (less than 3 months), post-weaned calves (3–12 months), heifers (13–24 months), and adult cattle (more than 24 months). All cattle were clinically normal and without obvious signs of diarrhea. All samples were stored in 2.5% potassium dichromate and sent to the laboratory for DNA extraction.

2.2. DNA Extraction

Each fecal sample was washed with sterile water and centrifuged at 2000× g for 15 min to remove potassium dichromate. The extraction of genomic DNA from individual samples was performed using a commercial E.Z.N.A Stool DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek Inc., Norcross, GA, USA, http://www.omegabiotek.com/ (accessed on 5 July 2020)), following the manufacturer’s recommended procedures. The genomic DNA was stored at –20 °C until its use in PCR amplification.

2.3. PCR Amplification

Cryptosporidium spp. species are determined by a nested PCR targeting the small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene [17]. The C. andersoni-positive samples were subsequently analyzed in four minisatellite/microsatellite targets, including MS1, MS2, MS3, and MS16 loci, according to previous studies [12,13]. The C. parvum-positive samples were further sub-typed according to the 60-kDa glycoprotein (gp60) gene [21]. Each specimen was set with two technical replicates at each genetic locus, and visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis.

2.4. Sequence Analysis and Phylogenetic Tree

All secondary PCR products were sent to Sangon Biotech (Sangon, Shanghai city, China) for bidirectional sequencing using an ABI 3170 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) to obtain the sequences of the PCR products. Software ChromasPro 2.1.5.0 (http://technelysium.com.au/ChromasPro.html (accessed on 10 September 2020)), BioEdit 7.1 (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/bioedit.html (accessed on 10 September 2020)), and ClustalX 2.1 (http://clustal.org (accessed on 21 September 2020)) were used to assemble and align the nucleotide sequences. The Cryptosporidium species were determined by comparison with relevant reference sequences in GenBank. The C. andersoni and C. parvum subtypes were named according to the established nomenclature [12,22]. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum-likelihood method to assess the phylogenetic relationship among Cryptosporidium spp. genotypes and subtypes using MEGA 7.0 (http://www.megasoftware.net/ (accessed on 15 October 2020)) based on substitution rates calculated by the general time-reversible model. The reliability of the data was assessed using bootstrapping with 1000 replicates.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The differences in occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. between regions and age groups were calculated using the Fisher’s exact test with the software Statistical Product and Service Solutions 20.0 (SPSS 20.0) (IMB Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Differences were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were generated using the software SPSS 20.0 to assess the strength of location and age factors in cattle.

3. Results

3.1. Occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp

Of the 442 fecal samples collected from Holstein cows on seven farms, 14.7% (n = 65) were positive for Cryptosporidium spp., with infection rates ranging from 0% (0/18) to 38.0% (38/100) (Table 1). Farm Yiliang-2 in Kunming city had a significantly higher occurrence rate than the other farms (p < 0.01). Among the samples from the four age groups, the occurrence rates of Cryptosporidium spp. varied from 12.9% to 50%. The difference in Cryptosporidium occurrence among the four age groups was not significant (p = 0.088). Of the 258 fecal samples analyzed, only 1.1% (n = 3) of samples from diary buffaloes at Tengcong-1 farm were positive for Cryptosporidium (Table 2). The difference in Cryptosporidium occurrence among the five farms was not significant. Among samples from the four age groups, only pre-weaned calves were detected with Cryptosporidium, and the difference in Cryptosporidium occurrence was not significant between age groups (p = 0.281).

3.2. Genotyping of Cryptosporidium spp

In this study, four Cryptosporidium species, namely C. andersoni (n = 56), C. bovis (n = 5), C. ryanae (n = 2), and C. parvum (n = 1), in Holstein cows, and one species, C. ryanae (n = 3), in dairy buffaloes, were identified. Regarding the Holstein cow farms, except for farm Binchuan-2, C. andersoni was observed on all farms, while C. bovis, C. ryanae, and C. parvum were also detected on more than three farms (Table 1). In terms of the dairy buffaloes, C. ryanae was the only species observed on the Tengchong-1 farm (Table 2).
In Holstein cows, two or more Cryptosporidium species were found in age groups other than pre-weaned calves, and only one species, C. bovis, was detected in pre-weaned calves. In addition, C. ryanae was found in heifers and adult cattle, and C. parvum existed in post-weaned calves. Similarly, C. ryanae was identified in pre- and post-weaned dairy buffalo calves. The Cryptosporidium spp. sequences found in Holstein cows were identical to reference sequences JN400881 (C. andersoni), MT950118 (C. bovis), JN400880 (C. ryanae), and MF671870 (C. parvum). In contrast, among the sequences obtained from dairy buffaloes, one sequence was identical to reference JN400880 (C. ryanae), and another two sequences were highly similar to reference JN400880 (C. ryanae), with one nucleotide substitution. The phylogenetic trees showed that the sequences of Cryptosporidium genotypes were clustered with their reference sequences (Figure 2).

3.3. Subtyping of Cryptosporidium andersoni and Cryptosporidium parvum

All the C. andersoni-positive samples were further subtyped by MLST using four loci (MS1, MS2, MS3, and MS16). However, only 17 of 56 C. andersoni isolates were successfully subtyped by the four loci, forming four MLST subtypes. Of these MLST subtypes, A5A4A2A1 (n = 7) and A4A4A4A1 (n = 7) were most prevalent on dairy cattle farms in Yiliang-2, followed by subtypes A1A4A4A1 (n = 2) and A4A4A2A1 (n = 1) observed on Eryuan farm. Furthermore, only one subtype (IIdA18G1) was successfully sequenced, based on a C. parvum-positive sample, at the gp60 gene locus (Table 1).

4. Discussion

This is the first report of the detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in Holstein cows and dairy buffaloes in Yunnan Province of China, with occurrences of 14.7% and 1.1%, respectively. The occurrence rates of these pathogens were higher than those found in Yunling cattle in a previous study [20]. The occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. in Holstein cows was similar to most previous studies conducted in China, with occurrence rates of 8.5% to 21.2% [9,10,15,23,24,25,26,27,28]. In contrast, the occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy buffaloes was lower than that found in Hunan Province (23.8%) [29] and the average rate for China (15.5%) [3]. The reasons for the different occurrence rates remain unclear, but the geography, age distribution of samples, the timing of sample collection, and sample sizes could be the contributing factors.
The four common Cryptosporidium species were identified in the present study. In the Holstein cows, C. andersoni was the predominant species, which is consistent with previous findings in China, India, and Brazil [9,14,24,30,31,32]. Although the number of samples from the pre-weaned and post-weaned calves, and heifers age groups was small, the age-related trend of Cryptosporidium spp. is similar to other studies; for example, in pre/post-weaned calves, C. bovis and C. parvum have been detected, while the occurrence of C. andersoni and C. ryanae was reported to gradually increase with increasing age [25,29,33]. Thus, further studies are needed to reveal the age-related pattern of Cryptosporidium spp. in Yunnan, China. Only one species, C. ryanae, was detected in the calves of dairy buffaloes, which is similar to previous data for buffaloes in Nepal and Egypt [34,35].
A high diversity of MLST subtypes of C. andersoni was detected in this study. Thus far, six cattle-associated C. andersoni subtypes have been reported in China [8], while four subtypes were detected in Yunnan Province. Among these subtypes, one MLST subtype (A4A4A4A1) was the prevalent subtype in Holstein cows, which is consistent with previous findings that these isolates are most common in cattle. In addition, three subtypes (A1A4A4A1, A5A4A4A1, and A4A4A2A1) detected in this study have also been reported in dairy cattle, beef cattle, and Qinchuan cattle, respectively [13,15].
Cryptosporidium parvum IIdA18G1 was first identified in Holstein cows in Yunnan Province. Cryptosporidium parvum is a zoonotic species occurring in pre-weaned calves. In most areas, C. parvum IIa subtypes are the primary factors causing diarrhea in calves [36,37,38]. In contrast, IId subtypes are commonly found in calves in China [2,39]. Until now, five subtypes of C. parvum, IIdA14G1, IIdA15G1, IIdA17G1, IIdA19G1, and IIdA20G1, have been identified in dairy cattle in China [3,5,19]; three of these five C. parvum subtypes (IIdA15G1, IIdA9G1, and IIdA20G1) have been reported as highly pathogenic subtypes responsible for a cryptosporidiosis outbreak in China [5,6,40]. Moreover, IIdA15G1 and IIdA19G1 are the dominant subtypes in dairy cattle in China [19], whereas the IIdA18G1 subtype has been reported in yaks in China [41], in dairy cattle in Serbia [42], in lambs in Spain [43,44], and in humans in the United kingdom and Kuwait [45,46]. Therefore, the presence of this subtype in Holstein cows imposes a potential threat of cryptosporidiosis transmission.

5. Conclusions

The present study revealed the high occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. infection in Holstein cattle from Yunnan Province, southwest China. The IIdA18G1 subtype of C. parvum represents a significant public health concern for humans, as a cattle attendant may come into contact with infected cattle without any biological protection. The four MLST subtypes (A5A4A4A1, A4A4A4A1, A4A4A2A1, and A1A4A4A1) of C. andersoni were mainly reported in cattle, which might have long-term adverse effects on the dairy cattle industry. In further studies, a higher number of samples from young animals will illuminate the complete picture of the occurrence of Cryptosporidium species in relation to particular age groups. This will allow a better understanding of Cryptosporidium infections in dairy cattle from Yunnan, and it will be interesting to know which age groups are important reservoirs of zoonotic and/or pathogenic species.

Author Contributions

F.-C.Z., J.-F.Y. and X.-Q.Z. conceived and designed the study. L.-H.P. performed the experiments. Y.-W.M. and F.-F.S. analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. F.-C.Z., Y.Z., Z.L. and J.-J.H. critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Yunnan Expert Workstation (Grant No. 202005AF150041), the Veterinary Public Health Innovation Team of Yunnan Province (Grant No. 202105AE160014), the Fund for Shanxi “1331 Project” (Grant No. 20211331-13), and The Special Research Fund of Shanxi Agricultural University for High-level Talents (Grant No. 2021XG001). The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The research protocol was reviewed and approved by the Life Science Ethics Committee of Yunnan Agricultural University. The Ethic code is YNAU2019llwyh073.

Informed Consent Statement

The collection of animal fecal samples was approved by the farmers.

Data Availability Statement

The sequences obtained in the study were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers OL420756, OL440396–OL440403, and OL454087.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Checkley, W.; White, A.C., Jr.; Jaganath, D.; Arrowood, M.J.; Chalmers, R.M.; Chen, X.M.; Fayer, R.; Griffiths, J.K.; Guerrant, R.L.; Hedstrom, L.; et al. A review of the global burden, novel diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccine targets for cryptosporidium. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2015, 15, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Feng, Y.Y.; Ryan, U.M.; Xiao, L.H. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Cryptosporidium. Trends Parasitol. 2018, 34, 997–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, R.; Zhao, G.; Gong, Y.; Zhang, L. Advances and Perspectives on the Epidemiology of Bovine Cryptosporidium in China in the Past 30 Years. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Thomson, S.; Hamilton, C.A.; Hope, J.C.; Katzer, F.; Mabbott, N.A.; Morrison, L.J.; Innes, E.A. Bovine cryptosporidiosis: Impact, host-parasite interaction and control strategies. Vet. Res. 2017, 48, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Zhang, Z.; Su, D.; Meng, X.; Liang, R.; Wang, W.; Li, N.; Guo, Y.; Guo, A.; Li, S.; Zhao, Z.; et al. Cryptosporidiosis outbreak caused by Cryptosporidium parvum subtype IIdA20G1 in neonatal calves. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2022, 69, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, N.; Wang, R.; Cai, M.; Jiang, W.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Outbreak of cryptosporidiosis due to Cryptosporidium parvum subtype IIdA19G1 in neonatal calves on a dairy farm in China. Int. J. Parasitol. 2019, 49, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Baldursson, S.; Karanis, P. Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: Review of worldwide outbreaks—An update 2004–2010. Water Res. 2011, 45, 6603–6614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gong, C.; Cao, X.F.; Deng, L.; Li, W.; Huang, X.M.; Lan, J.C.; Xiao, Q.C.; Zhong, Z.J.; Feng, F.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Epidemiology of Cryptosporidium infection in cattle in China: A review. Parasite 2017, 24, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wang, R.; Ma, G.; Zhao, J.; Lu, Q.; Wang, H.; Zhang, L.; Jian, F.; Ning, C.; Xiao, L. Cryptosporidium andersoni is the predominant species in post-weaned and adult dairy cattle in China. Parasitol. Int. 2011, 60, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, R.; Wang, H.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, L.; Jian, F.; Qi, M.; Ning, C.; Xiao, L. Characteristics of Cryptosporidium transmission in preweaned dairy cattle in Henan, China. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 1077–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Cai, M.; Guo, Y.; Pan, B.; Li, N.; Wang, X.; Tang, C.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Longitudinal monitoring of Cryptosporidium species in pre-weaned dairy calves on five farms in Shanghai, China. Vet. Parasitol. 2017, 241, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Feng, Y.; Yang, W.; Ryan, U.; Zhang, L.; Kvac, M.; Koudela, B.; Modry, D.; Li, N.; Fayer, R.; Xiao, L. Development of a multilocus sequence tool for typing Cryptosporidium muris and Cryptosporidium andersoni. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Wang, R.; Jian, F.; Zhang, L.; Ning, C.; Liu, A.; Zhao, J.; Feng, Y.; Qi, M.; Wang, H.; Lv, C.; et al. Multilocus sequence subtyping and genetic structure of Cryptosporidium muris and Cryptosporidium andersoni. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e43782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Zhao, G.H.; Ren, W.X.; Gao, M.; Bian, Q.Q.; Hu, B.; Cong, M.M.; Lin, Q.; Wang, R.J.; Qi, M.; Qi, M.Z.; et al. Genotyping Cryptosporidium andersoni in cattle in Shaanxi Province, Northwestern China. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e60112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Zhao, W.; Wang, R.; Zhang, W.; Liu, A.; Cao, J.; Shen, Y.; Yang, F.; Zhang, L. MLST subtypes and population genetic structure of Cryptosporidium andersoni from dairy cattle and beef cattle in northeastern China’s Heilongjiang Province. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e102006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Qi, M.; Wang, R.; Jing, B.; Jian, F.; Ning, C.; Zhang, L. Prevalence and multilocus genotyping of Cryptosporidium andersoni in dairy cattle and He cattle in Xinjiang, China. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2016, 44, 313–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Xiao, L. Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis: An update. Exp. Parasitol. 2010, 124, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ryan, U.; Fayer, R.; Xiao, L. Cryptosporidium species in humans and animals: Current understanding and research needs. Parasitology 2014, 141, 1667–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Molecular Epidemiology of Cryptosporidiosis in China. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Liang, X.X.; Zou, Y.; Li, T.S.; Chen, H.; Wang, S.S.; Cao, F.Q.; Yang, J.F.; Sun, X.L.; Zhu, X.Q.; Zou, F.C. First report of the prevalence and genetic characterization of Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. in Yunling cattle in Yunnan Province, southwestern China. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 158, 105025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xiao, L.; Escalante, L.; Yang, C.; Sulaiman, I.; Escalante, A.A.; Montali, R.J.; Fayer, R.; Lal, A.A. Phylogenetic Analysis of Cryptosporidium Parasites Based on the Small-Subunit rRNA Gene Locus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 1578–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Xiao, L.; Feng, Y. Molecular epidemiologic tools for waterborne pathogens Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2017, 8–9, 14–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chen, F.; Huang, K. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle from farms in China. J. Vet. Sci. 2012, 13, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Liu, A.; Wang, R.; Li, Y.; Zhang, L.; Shu, J.; Zhang, W.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L.; Ling, H. Prevalence and distribution of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle in Heilongjiang Province, China. Parasitol. Res. 2009, 105, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, W.; Wang, R.; Yang, F.; Zhang, L.; Cao, J.; Zhang, X.; Ling, H.; Liu, A.; Shen, Y. Distribution and genetic characterizations of Cryptosporidium spp. in pre-weaned dairy calves in Northeastern China’s Heilongjiang Province. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e54857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ma, L.; Sotiriadou, I.; Cai, Q.; Karanis, G.; Wang, G.; Wang, G.; Lu, Y.; Li, X.; Karanis, P. Detection of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in agricultural and water environments in the Qinghai area of China by IFT and PCR. Parasitol. Res. 2014, 113, 3177–3184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Feng, Y.; Gong, X.; Zhu, K.; Li, N.; Yu, Z.; Guo, Y.; Weng, Y.; Kvac, M.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Prevalence and genotypic identification of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in pre-weaned dairy calves in Guangdong, China. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liang, N.; Wu, Y.; Sun, M.; Chang, Y.; Lin, X.; Yu, L.; Hu, S.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, S.; Cui, Z.; et al. Molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle in Guangdong Province, South China. Parasitology 2019, 146, 28–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ma, J.B.; Li, P.; Zhao, X.P.; Xu, H.L.; Wu, W.X.; Wang, Y.F.; Guo, Y.Q.; Wang, L.; Feng, Y.Y.; Xiao, L.H. Occurrence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in dairy cattle, beef cattle and water buffaloes in China. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 207, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Paul, S.; Chandra, D.; Tewari, A.K.; Banerjee, P.S.; Ray, D.D.; Raina, O.K.; Rao, J.R. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium andersoni: A molecular epidemiological survey among cattle in India. Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 161, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fiuza, V.R.; Almeida, A.J.; Frazao-Teixeira, E.; Santin, M.; Fayer, R.; Oliveira, F.C. Occurrence of Cryptosporidium andersoni in Brazilian cattle. J. Parasitol. 2011, 97, 952–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. do Couto, M.C.; Lima Mde, F.; do Bomfim, T.C. New Cryptosporidium parvum subtypes of IIa subfamily in dairy calves from Brazil. Acta Trop. 2014, 130, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Diaz, P.; Navarro, E.; Remesar, S.; Garcia-Dios, D.; Martinez-Calabuig, N.; Prieto, A.; Lopez-Lorenzo, G.; Lopez, C.M.; Panadero, R.; Fernandez, G.; et al. The Age-Related Cryptosporidium Species Distribution in Asymptomatic Cattle from North-Western SPAIN. Animals 2021, 11, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Amer, S.; Zidan, S.; Feng, Y.; Adamu, H.; Li, N.; Xiao, L. Identity and public health potential of Cryptosporidium spp. in water buffalo calves in Egypt. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 191, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Feng, Y.; Karna, S.R.; Dearen, T.K.; Singh, D.K.; Adhikari, L.N.; Shrestha, A.; Xiao, L. Common occurrence of a unique Cryptosporidium ryanae variant in zebu cattle and water buffaloes in the buffer zone of the Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 185, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Guo, Y.; Ryan, U.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Association of Common Zoonotic Pathogens With Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 810142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Avendano, C.; Ramo, A.; Vergara-Castiblanco, C.; Monteagudo, L.V.; Sanchez-Acedo, C.; Quilez, J. Multilocus fragment analysis of Cryptosporidium parvum from pre-weaned calves in Colombia. Acta Trop. 2019, 192, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Avendano, C.; Ramo, A.; Vergara-Castiblanco, C.; Sanchez-Acedo, C.; Quilez, J. Genetic uniqueness of Cryptosporidium parvum from dairy calves in Colombia. Parasitol. Res. 2018, 117, 1317–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Li, N.; Zhao, W.; Song, S.; Ye, H.; Chu, W.; Guo, Y.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Diarrhoea outbreak caused by coinfections of Cryptosporidium parvum subtype IIdA20G1 and rotavirus in pre-weaned dairy calves. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2022, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cui, Z.; Wang, R.; Huang, J.; Wang, H.; Zhao, J.; Luo, N.; Li, J.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, L. Cryptosporidiosis caused by Cryptosporidium parvum subtype IIdA15G1 at a dairy farm in Northwestern China. Parasites Vectors 2014, 27, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Qi, M.; Cai, J.; Wang, R.; Li, J.; Jian, F.; Huang, J.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, L. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis from yaks in the central western region of China. BMC Microbiol. 2015, 15, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Misic, Z.; Abe, N. Subtype analysis of Cryptosporidium parvum isolates from calves on farms around Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro, using the 60 kDa glycoprotein gene sequences. Parasitology 2007, 134, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Quilez, J.; Torres, E.; Chalmers, R.M.; Hadfield, S.J.; Del Cacho, E.; Sanchez-Acedo, C. Cryptosporidium genotypes and subtypes in lambs and goat kids in Spain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 6026–6031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Ramo, A.; Quilez, J.; Monteagudo, L.; Del Cacho, E.; Sanchez-Acedo, C. Intra-Species Diversity and Panmictic Structure of Cryptosporidium parvum Populations in Cattle Farms in Northern Spain. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0148811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Chalmers, R.M.; Smith, R.P.; Hadfield, S.J.; Elwin, K.; Giles, M. Zoonotic linkage and variation in Cryptosporidium parvum from patients in the United Kingdom. Parasitol. Res. 2011, 108, 1321–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sulaiman, I.M.; Hira, P.R.; Zhou, L.; Al-Ali, F.M.; Al-Shelahi, F.A.; Shweiki, H.M.; Iqbal, J.; Khalid, N.; Xiao, L. Unique endemicity of cryptosporidiosis in children in Kuwait. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 2805–2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Animals 12 01031 g001 550
Figure 1. Map of sampling sites for Holstein cows and dairy buffaloes in Yunnan Province, China.
Figure 1. Map of sampling sites for Holstein cows and dairy buffaloes in Yunnan Province, China.
Animals 12 01031 g001
Animals 12 01031 g002 550
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree depicting evolutionary relationships among Cryptosporidium spp. sequences at the SSU rRNA locus. ▲: Sequence obtained in this study.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree depicting evolutionary relationships among Cryptosporidium spp. sequences at the SSU rRNA locus. ▲: Sequence obtained in this study.
Animals 12 01031 g002
Table
Table 1. Occurrence and identification of Cryptosporidium spp. in Holstein cows in Yunnan Province, China.
Table 1. Occurrence and identification of Cryptosporidium spp. in Holstein cows in Yunnan Province, China.
Location and AgeNo. Positive/Sample SizeOccurrence (%)p-ValueOR(95% CI)Cryptosporidium SpeciesC. andersoni
Subtype		C. parvum
Subtype
Sampling sites
Yiliang-1
Kunming city		15/14810.10.0765.64 (0.73–43.8)C. andersoni (9), C. bovis (4), C. ryanae (1), C. parvum (1)-IIdA18G1(1)
Yiliang-2
Kunming city		38/10038.00.00030.65 (4.06–231.08)C. andersoni (36), C. ryanae (1), C. bovis (1)A5A4A2A1 (7)
A4A4A4A1 (7)		-
Eryuan
Dali city		6/4513.30.0487.69 (0.89–66.57)C. andersoni (6)A4A4A2A1 (1)
A1A4A4A1 (2)		-
Weishan
Dali city		1/511.9-ReferenceC. andersoni (1)--
Binchuan-1
Dali city		3/585.10.6212.73 (0.28–27.08)C. andersoni (3)--
Binchuan-2
Dali city		0/180-----
Binchuan-3
Dali city		2/229.00.2145.00 (0.43–58.28)C. andersoni (1), C. ryanae (1)--
Age (months)
Pre-weaned calves
(<3)		2/450.00.0886.72 (0.92–48.97)C. bovis (2)--
Post-weaned calves
(3–12)		11/6716.40.4491.32(0.64–2.72)C. andersoni (10), C. parvum (1)A5A4A2A1(3)IIdA18G1(1)
Heifers
(13–24)		9/3923.00.0852.02(0.90–4.54)C. andersoni (6), C. ryanae (1), C. bovis (2)A4A4A4A1(1)
A4A4A2A1(1)
A1A4A4A1(2)		-
Adults
(>24)		43/33212.9-ReferenceC. andersoni (40), C. ryanae (2), C. bovis (1)A5A4A2A1(4)
A4A4A4A1 (6)		-
Total65/44214.7 C. andersoni (56), C. bovis (5), C. ryanae (3), C. parvum (1)A5A4A2A1 (7)
A4A4A4A1 (7)
A4A4A2A1 (1)
A1A4A4A1 (2)		IIdA18G1(1)
No, number; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Table
Table 2. Occurrence and identification of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy buffaloes in Yunnan Province, China.
Table 2. Occurrence and identification of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy buffaloes in Yunnan Province, China.
Location and AgeNo. Positive/Sample SizeOccurrence (%)p-ValueOR(95% CI)Cryptosporidium Species
Collection site
Heqing
Dali city		0/340---
Tengchong-1
Baoshan city		3/1332.2--C. ryanae (3)
Tengchong-2
Baoshan city		0/310---
Tengchong-3
Baoshan city		0/280---
Tengchong-4
Baoshan city		0/320---
Age groups (months) ---
Pre-weaned calves (<3)2/1118.10.2814.22(0.34–52.91)C. ryanae (2)
Post-weaned calves (3–12)1/205.0-ReferenceC. ryanae (1)
Heifers (13–24)0/210---
Adults (>24)
Total		0/206
3/258		0
1.1		-
-		-
-		-
-
No, number; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meng, Y.-W.; Shu, F.-F.; Pu, L.-H.; Zou, Y.; Yang, J.-F.; Zou, F.-C.; Zhu, X.-Q.; Li, Z.; He, J.-J. Occurrence and Molecular Characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in Dairy Cattle and Dairy Buffalo in Yunnan Province, Southwest China. Animals 2022, 12, 1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12081031

AMA Style

Meng Y-W, Shu F-F, Pu L-H, Zou Y, Yang J-F, Zou F-C, Zhu X-Q, Li Z, He J-J. Occurrence and Molecular Characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in Dairy Cattle and Dairy Buffalo in Yunnan Province, Southwest China. Animals. 2022; 12(8):1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12081031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meng, Ying-Wen, Fan-Fan Shu, Li-Hua Pu, Yang Zou, Jian-Fa Yang, Feng-Cai Zou, Xing-Quan Zhu, Zhao Li, and Jun-Jun He. 2022. "Occurrence and Molecular Characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in Dairy Cattle and Dairy Buffalo in Yunnan Province, Southwest China" Animals 12, no. 8: 1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12081031

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop